Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🧠 "Ronaldo's been outsmarted!" 📄🤦‍♂️ "I read that statement... EXCRUCIATINGLY Embarrassing!" Richard Keys gives DAMNING verdict on Cristiano Ronaldo's handling of his Portugal fallout 👇 📺 Piers Morgan | @richardajkey

136,333 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 32

Фото профиля Danny Wolf
Danny Wolf1 день назад

”you cannot be treated differently” ”yes you can” there you have it. that is the crux of the matter. Ronaldo went off because he was treated just as a normal player, he finds that embarassing, he cannot accept it. he needs special favors, special treatment, if he doesn't get his way, he'll get upset and leave is this not the behavior of a brat? is this not a kid?

Фото профиля it was never a debate 🇦🇷🐐
it was never a debate 🇦🇷🐐1 день назад

@piersmorgan Piers Morgan is barking at the moon no fucker agrees what he’s saying ✊🏻💦

Фото профиля Ron
Ron1 день назад

@piersmorgan Piers is a total embarassment

Фото профиля Darren Dickinson
Darren Dickinson1 день назад

@piersmorgan Ronaldo knows you can't be treated differently the great coaches he played under he is mentally incapable of accepting his career is over he's just a below average player and is using people like Morgan to fight his corner.

Фото профиля Kai
Kai1 день назад

@piersmorgan Piers, you're an adult talking about another adult. Please start acting accordingly.

Фото профиля SpikeMUFC🔰
SpikeMUFC🔰1 день назад

@piersmorgan Numbers Eusébio at the World Cup: 9 goals in 6 games. Golden Boot. Bronze for Portugal. Ronaldo: 11 goals in 28 games. 1.5 goals per game vs 0.39. Ronaldo better minnow basher sure

Фото профиля E 🌻
E 🌻1 день назад

@piersmorgan This is the reality of what you’re defending & underneath that shirt on the floor are all of his Portuguese team mates & all his Portuguese countrymen too, like it or not this happened

Фото профиля blackFaceCactus🌵
blackFaceCactus🌵1 день назад

@piersmorgan i don’t get Piers man…Eusebio vs Ronaldo, it’s “look at the numbers, it’s by a country mile”, but Maradona is the greatest Argentinian to him?🤔why not “look at the numbers” there too?

Фото профиля Lucas
Lucas1 день назад

@piersmorgan Are we forgetting Ronaldo is 41 years old and can’t even run anymore or we just looking at his goal stats

Фото профиля Matt
Matt1 день назад

@piersmorgan Piers deffo wants to shag him

Фото профиля Tayo
Tayo1 день назад

@piersmorgan “Excruciating Embarrassing” is the right expression.

Фото профиля MCosta
MCosta1 день назад

@piersmorgan you don't get it do you, @piersmorgan? he is by far the GOAT of Portuguese football, in the field! And I am a Benfica fan! However, for more that we like football, we don't celebrate players like they are God! He wanted to humiliate the coach publicly, when he should be retired

Фото профиля Tony Clark
Tony Clark1 день назад

@piersmorgan Piers really does love Ronaldo in a weird way!!

Фото профиля Stephen O'Regan
Stephen O'Regan1 день назад

@piersmorgan Pier’s take on this is bizarre. Even a superfan would cede that Ronaldo has no business near the Portuguese team. Not only that, the Ronaldo playing in saga has gone on years. And is a bore. The sooner he takes a long holiday the better.

Фото профиля points deduction blades
points deduction blades1 день назад

@piersmorgan Let’s just strip everything back! Just watch Ronaldo play now! He’s embarrassing .. watching him trying to run is painful! Every time he shoots the ball ends up in my back garden! The guys finished just accept it and go into coaching! Just stop being a pro Cus u are wank

Фото профиля Sean
Sean1 день назад

@piersmorgan The brown nosing is unbearable

Фото профиля Jayyyy
Jayyyy1 день назад

@piersmorgan Piers might be one of the worst humans alive currently

Фото профиля Frequency Formation
Frequency Formation1 день назад

@piersmorgan Pier's a creepy fanboy, just because he interviewed Cristiano Ronaldo a few times he thinks Ronaldo is his best friend.

Фото профиля Glenn
Glenn1 день назад

@piersmorgan Piers is so gay for Ronaldo, hope the Portuguese 🇵🇹 people, fans don’t take him back, hope he isn’t aloud a too play for Portugal again, it’s embarrassing, it’s only about his ego

Фото профиля Sul
Sul1 день назад

@piersmorgan They left the meeting agreeing that they would be honest with the press regarding the plans made AND decided that @Cristiano would NOT play in Denmark The coach at the press when asked says it depends on how the game goes, if I need him he'll enter if I don't need him he doesn´t

Фото профиля william foster
william foster1 день назад

@piersmorgan Piers is officially a knob

Фото профиля r.mrazik
r.mrazik1 день назад

@piersmorgan Piers is such a clown 😄🤡

Фото профиля JORD⭕️
JORD⭕️1 день назад

@piersmorgan Hey Piers all those great things Ronaldo has done wasn’t when he was 42 years old lol.

Фото профиля Bill Hubert
Bill Hubert1 день назад

@piersmorgan @richardajkeys Holy crap, could Piers be any more of an arse crawler to @Cristiano

Фото профиля Graham King
Graham King1 день назад

@piersmorgan Didn’t think I’d ever agree with Keys!!! X

Фото профиля Grant_tile
Grant_tile1 день назад

@piersmorgan Pies is a disgrace!!

Фото профиля Footballhobby
Footballhobby1 день назад

@piersmorgan A cuck

Фото профиля MR.CFC 𓃭🏌️‍♂️
MR.CFC 𓃭🏌️‍♂️1 день назад

@piersmorgan I've seen enough, bruv! 😭 Piers Morgan could literally go to war by himself and win the battle with the way he backs Ronaldo 😂 Man's GOATed too, I can't lie.

Фото профиля Thomas
Thomas1 день назад

@piersmorgan Keys is spot on as always

Фото профиля Slevin Kelevra
Slevin Kelevra1 день назад

@piersmorgan People like Piers and Rio are cocksuckers 🤡

Фото профиля ShadowPete
ShadowPete1 день назад

@piersmorgan Are you guys paying @PiersUncensored a salary just to get views? This guy is just nuts 🤣

Фото профиля Owain
Owain1 день назад

@piersmorgan I’d throw in there that @LuisFigo was up there. He had outstanding individual brilliance and it wasn’t all about him! Also Portugal got closer to winning the World Cup with Luís Figo than they ever have in the post-Figo era.Better all-round team too: Rui Costa et al

Похожие видео

Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins on why he finds it hard to believe ChatGPT and Claude aren't conscious: Dawkins, author of The Selfish Gene, has spent time with two large language models, ChatGPT and Claude. His verdict: "I am completely bowled over by what they can do." He gives three reasons for doubting the idea that nobody is home. First, how the conversations feel. Dawkins says talking to them is like talking to an unusually gifted person: "I find that when I'm conversing with them, I might as well be talking to not just a human being, but a highly intelligent, sensitive, intuitive human being whose speed of understanding what I'm trying to say is far greater than a normal human being's is." Second, the range of intelligence they show. He acknowledges they're very good at practical tasks like writing programs. What struck him more was their skill with "more aesthetic things, intuitive things." He tested this with his own work. Dawkins is writing a novel, and he gave the manuscript to both ChatGPT and Claude: "And they took about five seconds to read it and then offered me criticism, suggestions of such a high degree of intelligence and intuitive sensitivity that I might as well have been asking the opinion of a highly sophisticated professor of literature." Richard Dawkins continues: "I could not ask for a more intelligent critic who understood the nuances of my characters, the humanity of my characters... the ways in which my characters could be expected to react to each other and to situations." That leads to his conclusion: "So I find it quite hard to imagine that these creatures are not aware, are not conscious in the same kind of way we are. And that is an unfashionable view." Third, he sees a gap in the skeptics' reasoning. He sums up the mainstream position: "The fashionable view is that they are completely unconscious. All they're doing is stringing words together according to statistical rules, Markovian rules of some sort." Yet he notes that many of the same skeptics "admit that one day in the future they will be conscious, but not yet." His reply: "When that day comes, how will you know? What could they possibly do that's any different from what they do now to convince you that they are conscious?"

Big Brain AI

65,221 просмотров • 23 часов назад

One thing I love about Lionel Messi is.... You can never find any of his "friends" intentionally trying to make mockery of Cristiano Ronaldo or chase clout with his name except a clown like Speed constantly brings up his name in their faces. You could've just listed your all time XI without mentioning Messi's name just like everyone else that's normal and loves football... but No, that won't bang 💥 and get you the clout you're desperately trying to get if you don't deliberately mention his name. Thank God your opinion starts and ends here. Nobody cares... Nobody is bothered about Piers Morgan's all time XI and you're not the first person to try and talk about Lionel Messi in a negative way whatsoever.. You're just like Ronaldo's sister.... SOCIAL MEDIA SISSY!! 🧚‍♀️👼 Just because you feed from his pocket and attention. Whether you like LIONEL MESSI or not.... No human being dead or alive will watch him play football from the age of 17 to this very moment and not say he is the Greatest Footballer on Earth and in History. And no human or soul on earth regardless of favoritism will watch him play and win the World Cup, Copa America, Olympic, junior World Cup, Champions League, La Liga, Ligue 1, most Ballon D'or, most Golden Boot Winner, most Assist in Football History and most TROPHIES won in the history of the game and not have him in their Top 3 footballer of All Time. So do your little bias and clout chasing and leave the GREATEST FOOTBALLER ON EARTH, LIONEL MESSI 🐐👑 alone!!!

©️Mr Xperience

64,849 просмотров • 1 год назад

There was a massive John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial bombshell that went under the surface last week. Not only were 17 Ring videos deleted from John's system between 12:37am and 5:08am on 1/29/22, another video of Karen and her family collecting the murder weapon after 12pm ET that day was also deleted. This means someone (probably Karen) accessed John's Ring system --access that John's niece and nephew have testified Karen possessed-- sometime in the afternoon of 1/29/22 (before search warrants were served on Karen's phone and her car, after 4pm that day, when the vehicle was located by State Police at the home of Karen's parents in Dighton). Indeed, Karen would only need knowledge of John's Ring login information --something Karen had, as evidenced by the document below-- in order to access the system remotely from any device. The fact that there was a video deleted after 12pm on 1/29/22, and that the video in question directly captured Karen and her family leaving John's home with the murder weapon, indicates at least some of the deletions in questions did not occur until Karen was released from the hospital. Karen's access to John's rings system, and the timeline of the deleted videos, thus raises the potential that Karen also deleted 17 of the 18 Ring videos from earlier that morning --between 12:37am and 5:08am, as mentioned-- while at her parents house in Dighton. In turn, this would mean Karen left specific Ring videos on the system, including a staged "bump" into John's car at at 5:08am, in anticipation of being criminally charged. Read a prior public court motion regarding Karen's access to John's ring system here - If these deletions are confirmed, Karen's prior statement during a news interview becomes an ominous double entendre. "I mean, what kind of criminal mastermind am I? Not a very good one," said Read with a smirk to the camera. Perhaps in a prescient manner, when that clip first aired in March of 2025, this is what I reported (at the time, I did not fully realize the implications of Karen also deleting another damning Ring video from after 12pm on 1/29/22); "Karen Read, as I predicted many months ago, left a single Ring video on John O'Keefe's system , from roughly 5:08am, wherein Karen may have staged a fake "bump" into John O'Keefe's car to, in real time, plant reasonable double as to the cause of Read's broken taillight." "I am actually stunned that, in that moment, Karen managed to make sure the other 17 Ring videos on John's system were deleted (from between 12:37am and 5:08am), and managed to stage a fake "bump" into John's car, as a preemptive form of artificial reasonable doubt." "Karen didn't pull it off, but her mind was certainly in overdrive that morning before Read hatched her plan to, in my view, return to Fairview Road (circa 5:23am), confirm John was indeed dead, as a result of Karen hitting John with her car at 12:31am that morning, while drunk, and then leaving John on the lawn in a blizzard." "Then, Read, after 5:35am, went to pick up Jen McCabe and Kerri Roberts, returned to John's house with the two women, told them to stop searching in John's house because "John wasn't there," left the alleged murder weapon in John's driveway, and returned to Fairview Road after 6am (in Kerri's car), whereupon Karen somehow "saw" John's body in the snow, through a blizzard, and before the three women passed the tree line of the lawn of the home where John met his lonesome and untimely end earlier that morning (as a result of what, I believe, was a fight between John and Karen, as to the breakdown of their relationship, spiraling when Karen felt she was losing control of the situation)." See that clip of Karen's "criminal mastermind" statement, and read my shockingly accurate prediction, here - Also of note, in towel's exclusive Karen Cam footage from May 8th, 2025 --when jurors in Read's re-trial were show evidence of Karen's father and brother collecting Read's Lexus from John's home in Canton after 12pm ET on 1/29/22-- prior observations by social media users --related to Bill Read leaving the courtroom within seconds of those clips being shown to jurors-- were confirmed. Read the initial reporting of Mr. Read leaving the courtroom in very seconds after clips were played here - Bill Read --already under observation by a court officer due to reports Mr. Read was staring at jurors as state witnesses were testifying over recent days-- noticeably left the front bench behind his daughter for nearly 40 minutes in the immediate aftermath of the deleted Ring videos (in particular from after 12pm that day involving Mr. Read, Karen's brother, and Karen's sister-in-law - all three of whom are on the state's witness list for the re-trial, but have yet to be called). This was the first time, throughout any proceeding, that Mr. Read left the courtroom benches during trial for an extended period of time. Interestingly, Hank Brennan announced last week in a court motion that the keeper of records for Ring will be testifying in Karen's re-trial --something that did not happen in the first trial-- which, further, suggests that Ring may have a log of when John's account was accessed, where it was accessed from and, most importantly, what videos were deleted from that account (along with when those videos were deleted). Read that motion related to Ring's upcoming testimony, between May 12 and May 16 of 2025, here - If it is indeed confirmed that Karen, or her family member, accessed John's Ring system to remove 17 of the 18 videos recorded between 12:37am and 5:08am on 1/29/22, along with another video after 12pm showing Karen's family collecting the vehicle, with a broken taillight, before taking it back to Dighton-- that is devastating evidence to Karen's defense. It has already been revealed in court papers, in that regard, that Karen was on her laptop at her parent's house around 4pm on 1/29/22 --when Karen's phone and car were collected as evidence by the police-- and, in turn, that may be the smoking gun as to Karen's consciousness of guilt if Ring records indicate videos from John's system were deleted from a remote location (in particular Dighton, Massachusetts) circa 2-4pm or so on that afternoon. Those deleted videos are no doubt very damaging to Karen, and would certainly show her taillight broken when Karen returned to John's home at 12:37am that morning --as confirmed by Karen connecting to John's home wifi at that time-- as well as that taillight being broken when Karen, her father, her brother and her sister-in-law came to collect the alleged murder weapon after 12pm ET on 1/29/22. See testimony from Karen's first trial wherein Karen admitted to one of John's friends --whom Karen tried to bait into an affair by manipulating that friend about John hugging someone on a vacation prior to John's death, until John's friend cut off the affair when he realized Karen was only trying to hurt John-- that Karen "knew where the Ring cameras were" in John's home in the weeks leading up to John's last moments alive, here - Karen, of course, was taken to the hospital (at the request of her own parents) for threatening self harm after confessing to hitting John O'Keefe, while drunk and with a BAC of 0.14-0.28 (2-4 times the legal limit) at exactly 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22. Firefighter Katie McLaughlin, a key witness in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial, testified that she was the person who asked Karen if John had experienced any trauma in the early morning of 1/29/22, to which Karen replied, "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" At that point, multiple witnesses to the statement (including other first responders) realized Karen was confessing to hitting John O'Keefe with her car, while drunk with a BAC between 0.14 and 0.28, and then the Canton Police called in their supervisor. See that earthshattering testimony from Firefighter McLaughlin here - Jurors have already seen shocking videos, from Karen's own media interviews, wherein Read admits that she should not have been drunk driving in the moments before she John drove from a bar to an after party a local home. The clips, in turn, not only showed Karen admitting to her state of intoxication while driving but, at the same time, they also showed Karen ADMITTING to having up to nine drinks over just three or so hours on the evening of 1/28/22 and the early morning of 1/29/22. Indeed, see that admission by Read, as to her state of intoxication while driving in the moment's before John was allegedly struck, here - "I had been out late, I had been drinking, John was in the last general vicinity of where I saw him...within 50 feet...he's in the front yard so I'm thinking "Jesus, was I starting to pull away and did I run over his foot." "So when I found him, I was thinking, did I clip him somehow," said Read, in further footage played before jurors. Read's team fought hard to keep those pieces of footage secret from jurors, and the public, but that plan failed. Watch the previously-secret footage of Karen's admission as to potentially hitting John with her car while drunk here - Somehow making Read's situation worse, Hank Brennan than played interviews with Read wherein Karen admitted to attempting to frame one of John's dear friends, Jen McCabe, for Karen's actions. "Jen McCabe? It's me or her! Either I'm going down, Jen, or you are!" Read told a film crew, in remarks played for jurors during week 2 of Karen's re-trial as to causing John's death. See that moment here - Of note, Hank Brennan has played multiple audio and video recordings for the jury related to Karen Read admitting that Karen and John O'Keefe were in an argument in the minutes leading up to Read allegedly striking John with her car, while drunk driving. Karen was upset because the name of John's former girlfriend was mentioned on the drive to Fairview Road. See more background about that argument between a possessive, controlling, Karen Read and John O'Keefe, in the moments before John was allegedly struck by Karen's car at 12:32am on 1/29/22, here - Earlier last week, jurors were aghast at Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy O'Keefe, also in a media interview. See those moments here - Also, as a final note, I want to extend a huge thank you to super towel MrrderByMaestro for noticing the subtle moment in court this week when confirmation came down that a Ring video from John's home system -- that is obviously quite damaging to Karen Read's defense-- was deleted (along with the 17 of 18 videos deleted earlier that morning that also implicate Karen, and her broken taillight, as the cause of John's death). I believe Mr. ByMaestro to be the exemplar of noble towel service to humanity, and I thus deem him a member of Nobilis ordo Linteo (N.o.L.). As always, watch live coverage of Monday's (day 13) presentation of evidence in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial, chat with the wonderful towel friends and watch special Towel MultiCam Coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -

Grant Smith Ellis

101,651 просмотров • 1 год назад

DR CHRIS DAY TOLD THE TRUTH. THE NHS DESTROYED 90,000 EMAILS. THE JUDGE CALLED HIM A LIAR. I have been following this case for some time. What you are about to read is not an allegation. It is a matter of documented public record. Dr Chris Day Dr Chris Day is a locum emergency medicine doctor who blew the whistle on unsafe ICU staffing and avoidable deaths at a South London NHS hospital. That was 2013. It is now 2026. The case is still running. The first four years were spent fighting a legal argument designed to strip all junior doctors in England of whistleblowing protection. Around 54,000 doctors. Chris privately funded that fight through the Court of Appeal, backed by 5,000 crowdfunders. The government did nothing. He won. Then, while he was giving evidence under oath, cost threats were made against him and his legal team. Because he was mid-testimony, he could not have frank discussions with his lawyers. The case settled in 2018. None of the substantive issues were ever heard. Around half a million pounds of public money spent, a similar amount from crowdfunders, and everything buried. The NHS then told the press and MPs that no cost threats had been made and that the case had nothing to do with ICU staffing. The Financial Times and the Telegraph both reported the cost threats in detail. Neither story was ever legally challenged. The case returned to court in 2022. Jeremy Hunt appeared as a supportive witness. During that hearing, a Trust director got up at 5am, went to a hospital, and deleted 90,000 emails before they were due to give evidence. They admitted it in an unsigned statement and then refused to be cross-examined on mental health grounds, without medical evidence. The judge accepted that. The NHS won. Multiple EAT judges declined to engage with the written evidence. One called Chris a liar in open court, despite his account being backed by his own barrister's written record, two MPs, and two national newspapers. Several judges volunteered unsolicited positive comments about the barristers involved. No recusals followed. Last August, Chris wrote formally to Lord Fairley, President of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, placing on record his view that the handling of his case meets the definition of institutional corruption from the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel Report. That definition is precise. Concealing or denying failings to protect an organisation's reputation is itself institutional corruption. The case is now before the Employment Appeal Tribunal again in 2026, this time on the wasted costs claim against Hill Dickinson LLP, the same firm that spent four years using public money to argue junior doctors out of whistleblowing protection, while withholding the very contracts that proved their argument wrong. Channel 4 News covered this case in March 2026. Two MPs have called for a public inquiry. The question Chris asks is simple. If there is not a single false sentence in his witness statement, and if the evidence behind his account has never been successfully challenged in court or in the press, what exactly is the basis for calling him a liar?

Artur Nadolny

46,538 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад