Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

ROSEN: 'Pharisees' is a problematic and historically weaponized term that casts Jewish communities as morally corrupt. You said it today. Words matter. How do you justify using this language? HEGSETH: It's a pretty accurate term for folks who don't see the plank in their own eye. I stand by it.

Aaron Rupar

1,116,378 subscribers

106,417 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

SEN. JACKY ROSEN: You cast Jewish communities as morally corrupt. How do you justify using this language? PETE HEGSETH: *laughing* Senator, I feel like it's a pretty accurate term. So I stand by it.

SEN. JACKY ROSEN: You cast Jewish communities as morally corrupt. How do you justify using this language? PETE HEGSETH: laughing Senator, I feel like it's a pretty accurate term. So I stand by it.

First To Hear It

87,299 views • 3 months ago

NEW: Dem Senator Jacky Rosen fumes and pulls down her name plate after Secretary of War Pete Hegseth refused to apologize for calling people ‘Pharisees.’ Rosen: “Words matter! It's a historically hurtful term. Why do you continue to use it, and what actions are you taking…?” Hegseth: “I feel like it's a pretty accurate term for folks who don't see the plank in their own eye…” Rosen: “I expect anyone who is in leadership in our country to be respectful and use respectful terms and not be an antisemite!”

NEW: Dem Senator Jacky Rosen fumes and pulls down her name plate after Secretary of War Pete Hegseth refused to apologize for calling people ‘Pharisees.’ Rosen: “Words matter! It's a historically hurtful term. Why do you continue to use it, and what actions are you taking…?” Hegseth: “I feel like it's a pretty accurate term for folks who don't see the plank in their own eye…” Rosen: “I expect anyone who is in leadership in our country to be respectful and use respectful terms and not be an antisemite!”

Collin Rugg

583,516 views • 3 months ago

Question: Democrats were appalled by Trump using the term “rigged elections,” but now you’re using it. How do you justify that? Jeffries: This is totally (D)ifferent.

Question: Democrats were appalled by Trump using the term “rigged elections,” but now you’re using it. How do you justify that? Jeffries: This is totally (D)ifferent.

Western Lensman

58,416 views • 9 months ago

.Allie Beth Stuckey answers the question: “Should we be using the term Judeo-Christian?” “We can debate Judeo-Christian and whether you should use it, whether it’s a helpful term, whether you think it’s an accurate term or a biblical term- that’s fine. But let’s not pretend this debate is happening in a vacuum outside of the context of people’s Israel and Jewish derangement syndrome.” Allie says it’s a matter of preference and conscience. The term isn’t mentioned in scripture. It’s simply a descriptive term for shared values rooted in the Old Testament. She concludes, “I really don’t care if someone uses that or just says Christian.” Whatever you choose, there’s no basis for demonizing people who DO use it. It was a completely innocuous term until anti-Jewish sentiment created a controversy.

.Allie Beth Stuckey answers the question: “Should we be using the term Judeo-Christian?” “We can debate Judeo-Christian and whether you should use it, whether it’s a helpful term, whether you think it’s an accurate term or a biblical term- that’s fine. But let’s not pretend this debate is happening in a vacuum outside of the context of people’s Israel and Jewish derangement syndrome.” Allie says it’s a matter of preference and conscience. The term isn’t mentioned in scripture. It’s simply a descriptive term for shared values rooted in the Old Testament. She concludes, “I really don’t care if someone uses that or just says Christian.” Whatever you choose, there’s no basis for demonizing people who DO use it. It was a completely innocuous term until anti-Jewish sentiment created a controversy.

Jackie Chea ⚖️

11,350 views • 5 days ago

MUST WATCH: Senator Markwayne Mullin absolutely goes off on Senate Democrats for their ridiculous self-righteousness as they attempt to smear Pete Hegseth: Markwayne Mullin: “It's for show...It is so ridiculous that you guys hold yourselves up as this higher standard, and you forget you got a big plank in your eye.”

MUST WATCH: Senator Markwayne Mullin absolutely goes off on Senate Democrats for their ridiculous self-righteousness as they attempt to smear Pete Hegseth: Markwayne Mullin: “It's for show...It is so ridiculous that you guys hold yourselves up as this higher standard, and you forget you got a big plank in your eye.”

Conservative War Machine

53,843 views • 1 year ago

A few words and thoughts on the usage of the term "white people." As some of you might know, I dislike using this term for a number of reasons Controversial to some of you, I know; but I'll attempt to explain why, in a nutshell.

A few words and thoughts on the usage of the term "white people." As some of you might know, I dislike using this term for a number of reasons Controversial to some of you, I know; but I'll attempt to explain why, in a nutshell.

Brian Nijman

19,612 views • 2 years ago

Fiona Bruce, "You spoke to a journalist, who asked if you could make their breasts bigger and then gave it a go" Zack Polanski, "I said no. They said, would you be willing to do it as an experiment. I said, as long as you make it clear that it's not something I do, it's not something I charge for"

Fiona Bruce, "You spoke to a journalist, who asked if you could make their breasts bigger and then gave it a go" Zack Polanski, "I said no. They said, would you be willing to do it as an experiment. I said, as long as you make it clear that it's not something I do, it's not something I charge for"

Farrukh

686,292 views • 9 months ago

ROSEN: Did you discuss Gen. Haugh's dismissal with Laura Loomer prior to his removal? HEGSETH: I don't discuss who I talk about anything with, but ultimately this is my decision ROSEN: Do you believe it's appropriate for social media personalities to influence personnel decisions in your department? HEGSETH: I believe your time is up ROSEN: It is not up to you to tell me when my time is up

ROSEN: Did you discuss Gen. Haugh's dismissal with Laura Loomer prior to his removal? HEGSETH: I don't discuss who I talk about anything with, but ultimately this is my decision ROSEN: Do you believe it's appropriate for social media personalities to influence personnel decisions in your department? HEGSETH: I believe your time is up ROSEN: It is not up to you to tell me when my time is up

Aaron Rupar

619,418 views • 1 year ago

Reporter: You said on Fox News the entire Pentagon is working against secretary hegseth. The people who were fired were his own guys. How do you square it, and you see concerns? Leavitt: They were Pentagon employees who leaked against their boss to news agencies in this room

Reporter: You said on Fox News the entire Pentagon is working against secretary hegseth. The people who were fired were his own guys. How do you square it, and you see concerns? Leavitt: They were Pentagon employees who leaked against their boss to news agencies in this room

Acyn

1,585,348 views • 1 year ago

This is absolutely insane. Trump says '86' is a "mob" term for "kill him". Hey Grok, is "86" a mob term for "kill him?" "Get rid of him" is. "Remove him" is. "Make him go away" is as well. Are those all now threats to say too if you are a Democrat? Trump: “You know 86. It is a mob term for kill him. You know. Did you ever see the movies? ’86 him’ That means ‘kill him.’ I think of it as a mob term. People think of it as something having to do with disappearing. But the mob uses that term to say when they want ot kill somebody. They say ’86 the son of a gun.’ “

This is absolutely insane. Trump says '86' is a "mob" term for "kill him". Hey Grok, is "86" a mob term for "kill him?" "Get rid of him" is. "Remove him" is. "Make him go away" is as well. Are those all now threats to say too if you are a Democrat? Trump: “You know 86. It is a mob term for kill him. You know. Did you ever see the movies? ’86 him’ That means ‘kill him.’ I think of it as a mob term. People think of it as something having to do with disappearing. But the mob uses that term to say when they want ot kill somebody. They say ’86 the son of a gun.’ “

Ed Krassenstein

550,144 views • 3 months ago

“Jews were so fantastically successful, in particular in the United States… that it's hard for it not to have gone to their heads, that sense of being superior…. because it's Jews, they're Jewish supremacists.” Briahna Joy Gray and Norman Finkelstein engage in some casual antisemitic speech, claiming that Jews being successful and wanting to have a state is “Jewish supremacy.” The episode of the Bad Faith Podcast is called “Why Using the Term ‘Jewish Supremacist’ Is More Useful than Zionist.” Just a reminder: The person who coined and popularized the term “Jewish Supremacy” is non other than former KKK leader David Duke.

“Jews were so fantastically successful, in particular in the United States… that it's hard for it not to have gone to their heads, that sense of being superior…. because it's Jews, they're Jewish supremacists.” Briahna Joy Gray and Norman Finkelstein engage in some casual antisemitic speech, claiming that Jews being successful and wanting to have a state is “Jewish supremacy.” The episode of the Bad Faith Podcast is called “Why Using the Term ‘Jewish Supremacist’ Is More Useful than Zionist.” Just a reminder: The person who coined and popularized the term “Jewish Supremacy” is non other than former KKK leader David Duke.

Canary Mission

154,953 views • 8 months ago

If anyone calls me a conspiracy theorist, I laugh at them and say, "Don't you know the CIA invented that term to mock people that question mainstream narratives and here you are, still using it today?" 🤡

If anyone calls me a conspiracy theorist, I laugh at them and say, "Don't you know the CIA invented that term to mock people that question mainstream narratives and here you are, still using it today?" 🤡

𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽

73,022 views • 6 months ago

"This is very urgent business, ladies and gentlemen, I beseech you. Resist it while you still can, and before the right to complain is taken away from you, which will be the next thing. You will be told you can't complain because you're Islamophobic. The term is already being introduced into the culture, as if it was an accusation of race hatred, for example, or bigotry, whereas it's only the objection to the preaching's of a very extreme and absolutist religion. Watch out for these symptoms. They are the symptoms of surrender. Very often ecumenically offered to you by men of God in other robes, Christian and Jewish and smarmy ecumenical. These are the ones who will hold open the gates for the barbarians. The barbarians never take a city until someone holds the gates open for them. And it's your own preachers who will do it for you and your own multicultural authorities who will do it for you. Resist it while you can."

"This is very urgent business, ladies and gentlemen, I beseech you. Resist it while you still can, and before the right to complain is taken away from you, which will be the next thing. You will be told you can't complain because you're Islamophobic. The term is already being introduced into the culture, as if it was an accusation of race hatred, for example, or bigotry, whereas it's only the objection to the preaching's of a very extreme and absolutist religion. Watch out for these symptoms. They are the symptoms of surrender. Very often ecumenically offered to you by men of God in other robes, Christian and Jewish and smarmy ecumenical. These are the ones who will hold open the gates for the barbarians. The barbarians never take a city until someone holds the gates open for them. And it's your own preachers who will do it for you and your own multicultural authorities who will do it for you. Resist it while you can."

Apple Lamps

47,699 views • 14 days ago

Today I am down at the 'together against the far right protest'. I am using their words against them, showing how dangerous it is to label millions of people with the term far right. Let's flip it back on them. Hitler was a far left socialist who believed in mass state control - I stand against that. Updates coming soon! Grassroots action is where the real battle takes place 💪🏻

Today I am down at the 'together against the far right protest'. I am using their words against them, showing how dangerous it is to label millions of people with the term far right. Let's flip it back on them. Hitler was a far left socialist who believed in mass state control - I stand against that. Updates coming soon! Grassroots action is where the real battle takes place 💪🏻

Montgomery Toms

130,766 views • 4 months ago

Peter Thiel on how to think about the future “What you end up doing when you think of the future as indefinite is you pick a job that will be good on your resume because it will then lead to a different job later on.” Instead of viewing the future as indefinite, Thiel suggests that the students in the audience think of the future on three horizons: short term, medium term, and long term. And he defines them as follows: 1. Short term = Are you going to be happy and will you be learning a lot? 2. Medium term = How good is it on your resume? 3. Long term = Are you working on something important or meaningful? “I think we are in a skewed world where we overweight the medium term, and we underweight some combination of the short term and the long term.” Thiel recommends recalibrating it to: “Focus on some combination of short term and long term. And forget about the medium term.” Video source: Radical Discourse (2014)

Peter Thiel on how to think about the future “What you end up doing when you think of the future as indefinite is you pick a job that will be good on your resume because it will then lead to a different job later on.” Instead of viewing the future as indefinite, Thiel suggests that the students in the audience think of the future on three horizons: short term, medium term, and long term. And he defines them as follows: 1. Short term = Are you going to be happy and will you be learning a lot? 2. Medium term = How good is it on your resume? 3. Long term = Are you working on something important or meaningful? “I think we are in a skewed world where we overweight the medium term, and we underweight some combination of the short term and the long term.” Thiel recommends recalibrating it to: “Focus on some combination of short term and long term. And forget about the medium term.” Video source: Radical Discourse (2014)

Startup Archive

43,027 views • 1 year ago

The new calls for foreigners to learn Lithuanian in Vilnius 🇱🇹 are still being dismissed by some as "politics." But it shouldn’t be seen that way at all. Historically, the Lithuanian language has been pushed into the shadows more than once. Today, we’re again seeing the public space being dominated by russian. These initiatives aren't about control, they’re a reminder that this is Lithuania and the Lithuanian language is the norm here. It’s about respect, plain and simple. Language shouldn't be a matter of politics. Lithuanians don't want russian to be the default in their own city. This isn't up for debate - it's a lesson learned from history.

The new calls for foreigners to learn Lithuanian in Vilnius 🇱🇹 are still being dismissed by some as "politics." But it shouldn’t be seen that way at all. Historically, the Lithuanian language has been pushed into the shadows more than once. Today, we’re again seeing the public space being dominated by russian. These initiatives aren't about control, they’re a reminder that this is Lithuania and the Lithuanian language is the norm here. It’s about respect, plain and simple. Language shouldn't be a matter of politics. Lithuanians don't want russian to be the default in their own city. This isn't up for debate - it's a lesson learned from history.

Dakas ‡

11,922 views • 3 months ago

STUBB: It's no-brainer. For goodness' sake, if our biggest long-term security threat is Russia, and our main aim is to deter Russian aggression. How do you do it? By maximizing your security. How? By having your own strong national defense. But look who can help you: Ukrainians.

STUBB: It's no-brainer. For goodness' sake, if our biggest long-term security threat is Russia, and our main aim is to deter Russian aggression. How do you do it? By maximizing your security. How? By having your own strong national defense. But look who can help you: Ukrainians.

Kate from Kharkiv

62,531 views • 2 months ago