Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

ROUNDS: ‘FIRSTHAND’ UAP WHISTLEBLOWERS “The only folks that [I] sat down and talked with… have *firsthand* knowledge of either a program or… firsthand knowledge of actually seeing something or touching something that to them was not explainable.” “There is something to this.”

MvonRen's profile picture

Marik vR

22,351 subscribers

131,478 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаЗдоровье и велнесНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

David Grusch has Firsthand Knowledge 💥🛸 David Grusch says that the watering down of the Schumer/Rounds amendment is the greatest legislative failure in American history. Grusch also reveals that he does in fact have firsthand knowledge and will be able to tell more in a "few weeks". He says he was read into a UAP program directly. #ufoX #ufos #ufo #uap #ufotwitter
9:22

David Grusch has Firsthand Knowledge 💥🛸 David Grusch says that the watering down of the Schumer/Rounds amendment is the greatest legislative failure in American history. Grusch also reveals that he does in fact have firsthand knowledge and will be able to tell more in a "few weeks". He says he was read into a UAP program directly. #ufoX #ufos #ufo #uap #ufotwitter

Mike Colangelo

444,329 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨"I don't have firsthand knowledge of the different types of non-human intelligences that the government is aware of." "And actually, there are even books that have been published by former Defence Intelligence Agency officials about the investigations documenting these types of NHI." "And I also don't have firsthand knowledge of them, but, there are declassified reports and books document this." "So the government is aware, and that's on the record." Tim Gallaudet speaks on what the Government knows about Alien beings.. H/T: NewsNation Elizabeth Vargas
0:48

🚨"I don't have firsthand knowledge of the different types of non-human intelligences that the government is aware of." "And actually, there are even books that have been published by former Defence Intelligence Agency officials about the investigations documenting these types of NHI." "And I also don't have firsthand knowledge of them, but, there are declassified reports and books document this." "So the government is aware, and that's on the record." Tim Gallaudet speaks on what the Government knows about Alien beings.. H/T: NewsNation Elizabeth Vargas

UAPWixy

16,574 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is working with Stephen Miller and the White House to provide immunity for UFO whistleblowers with firsthand knowledge of alien craft and bodies. 👀
0:51

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is working with Stephen Miller and the White House to provide immunity for UFO whistleblowers with firsthand knowledge of alien craft and bodies. 👀

Astral🛸

16,561 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard." ~Rubio As expected... No Disclosure. 🤷🏼‍♂️ Nothing new, and Hannity started off with a "fun" question about The Age of Disclosure. 🙄 If you've followed my tweets the past few days, what Rubio said, or didn't say, should come as no surprise. He said they used "selective editing" in the doc and was interviewed 3-4 years ago. That's why I said we needed to hear the entire interview, uncut. Rubio: ""I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard. I don't have independent knowledge that what they're saying is true. We have people with very high jobs in the USG that are either, A) Liars, B) Crazy or C) Telling the truth. And two of those three options are not good. I don't know the answer. I don't want to call them liars, I just don't have any independent way to verify every things they said."
2:47

"I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard." ~Rubio As expected... No Disclosure. 🤷🏼‍♂️ Nothing new, and Hannity started off with a "fun" question about The Age of Disclosure. 🙄 If you've followed my tweets the past few days, what Rubio said, or didn't say, should come as no surprise. He said they used "selective editing" in the doc and was interviewed 3-4 years ago. That's why I said we needed to hear the entire interview, uncut. Rubio: ""I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard. I don't have independent knowledge that what they're saying is true. We have people with very high jobs in the USG that are either, A) Liars, B) Crazy or C) Telling the truth. And two of those three options are not good. I don't know the answer. I don't want to call them liars, I just don't have any independent way to verify every things they said."

Joe Murgia

37,878 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 Joe Rogan says he’s changed his position on UFOs and now believes something real is going on. He says the slow, bureaucratic drip of information actually adds credibility… and that David Grusch claiming firsthand knowledge changed everything for him.
1:55

🚨 Joe Rogan says he’s changed his position on UFOs and now believes something real is going on. He says the slow, bureaucratic drip of information actually adds credibility… and that David Grusch claiming firsthand knowledge changed everything for him.

UAP Reporting Center

339,159 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 Joe Rogan says he’s changed his position on UFOs and now believes something real is going on. He says the slow, bureaucratic drip of information actually adds credibility… and that David Grusch claiming firsthand knowledge changed everything for him.
1:56

🚨 Joe Rogan says he’s changed his position on UFOs and now believes something real is going on. He says the slow, bureaucratic drip of information actually adds credibility… and that David Grusch claiming firsthand knowledge changed everything for him.

UAP Reporting Center

155,667 просмотров • 15 дней назад

MASSIVE: Candace Owens says there is overwhelming evidence that the Feds framed Tyler Robinson as a patsy. “I am speaking to people with firsthand, intimate knowledge, and they all believe that the Feds set this up.”
1:22

MASSIVE: Candace Owens says there is overwhelming evidence that the Feds framed Tyler Robinson as a patsy. “I am speaking to people with firsthand, intimate knowledge, and they all believe that the Feds set this up.”

Karl K. Wuckert

84,405 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"I have nothing that would suggest that it is of out-of-this-world origin, except that we can't explain at that point the physics that appear to be employed." ~Rounds (Except? That's a pretty big except that points towards anomalous tech. And it doesn't have to be from out of this world in order to belong to a non-human intelligence. Maybe it's human but not part of our society as we know it? Maybe future humans, or another form of human? Maybe something based here? No matter what Ross Coulthart threw at Senator Mike Rounds, it was deflected without a second thought. Keep reading. I went beyond the video clip.) Rounds: "I try to talk to anybody that has firsthand knowledge of actually working on projects. In fact, I told my team that I don't have an interest in talking to people that have second hand knowledge or that will relay information to me without evidence that they have firsthand knowledge of any particular type of materials or projects. I've talked to individuals that have told me their firsthand knowledge of things that they can't explain, but I have never gotten to the point where I could determine what it was as an item or a project or a platform, that what it really is." (So, has he had any firsthand witnesses tell him that why worked hands-on a non-human craft? If so, what did Rounds do to confirm or refute that? Did he get access to the program and see a craft up close? Did he ever find a program that had that type of evidence? I thought Ross did great but I would have loved if he asked Rounds this: Were you ever denied access to a program/location? "I've given [members of Congress and the executive branch] not only the existence of non-human intelligence but the address to go look to see it. And they were denied access." ~Jay Stratton - Jay Stratton ~ Rounds: "And so, are there things that I can't explain, based upon direct information from individuals that have observed information or materials? The answer to that is yes. But I have nothing that would suggest that it is of out of this world origin, except that we can't explain at that point the physics that appear to be employed. So, whether it's from one of our adversaries or whether it's from a unique project here within the United States, I simply don't know and I won't draw conclusions." (He admits that they can't explain the physics and then reverts to it possibly being from an adversary or one of our own USG projects. And doesn't suggest that it may very well be something truly anomalous.) Ross: The WSJ says, in the 1960s, live, thermonuclear weapons were tested against EMPs. Do you find that plausible? I couldn't believe the USAF would do that. Rounds: I know we've done a great deal of research with regard to EMPs. We've had to study EMPs as a weapon system and our adversaries have looked at them as a weapon system. EMPs would do damage to electronic equipment but not to humans or structures. (Welp. He obviously finds it plausible.) Ross: How about enhancing the whistleblower protections? Rounds: "I don't know that the existing protections fail us." Ross: What about AARO? Rounds: I met with AARO leaders and found them to be frank and open, "I don't have any evidence that says that there's in any way a desire to limit their ability to do research or to hide the information that they're doing. " (Bring in Kosloski and ask him if he told James Fox that he had to get approval from the DOD even if he just wanted to part his hair.) Ross: Rubio said we've had repeated instances of something operating over restricted nuclear facilities, and it's not ours. And we don't know whose it is. Any kind of craft over sensitive national security sites is a national security threat. Rounds: I don't disagree. But I don't know if it's ours or if it belongs to one of our adversaries. And if it's neither, then I don't know whose it is. I'm not gonna jump to conclusions and I'm gonna keep my options open. I wanna make sure that if it's something one of our organizations in the US actually is testing or working with that we not disclose it. If it belongs to one of our adversaries, we wanna make sure that we have all of the information we can gather on it and be prepared to defend against it. "And if there's something that is neither ours nor theirs, it belongs some place else, then my curiousity really starts to grow at that state of the game and I wanna be open to those possibilities as well."
1:25

"I have nothing that would suggest that it is of out-of-this-world origin, except that we can't explain at that point the physics that appear to be employed." ~Rounds (Except? That's a pretty big except that points towards anomalous tech. And it doesn't have to be from out of this world in order to belong to a non-human intelligence. Maybe it's human but not part of our society as we know it? Maybe future humans, or another form of human? Maybe something based here? No matter what Ross Coulthart threw at Senator Mike Rounds, it was deflected without a second thought. Keep reading. I went beyond the video clip.) Rounds: "I try to talk to anybody that has firsthand knowledge of actually working on projects. In fact, I told my team that I don't have an interest in talking to people that have second hand knowledge or that will relay information to me without evidence that they have firsthand knowledge of any particular type of materials or projects. I've talked to individuals that have told me their firsthand knowledge of things that they can't explain, but I have never gotten to the point where I could determine what it was as an item or a project or a platform, that what it really is." (So, has he had any firsthand witnesses tell him that why worked hands-on a non-human craft? If so, what did Rounds do to confirm or refute that? Did he get access to the program and see a craft up close? Did he ever find a program that had that type of evidence? I thought Ross did great but I would have loved if he asked Rounds this: Were you ever denied access to a program/location? "I've given [members of Congress and the executive branch] not only the existence of non-human intelligence but the address to go look to see it. And they were denied access." ~Jay Stratton - Jay Stratton ~ Rounds: "And so, are there things that I can't explain, based upon direct information from individuals that have observed information or materials? The answer to that is yes. But I have nothing that would suggest that it is of out of this world origin, except that we can't explain at that point the physics that appear to be employed. So, whether it's from one of our adversaries or whether it's from a unique project here within the United States, I simply don't know and I won't draw conclusions." (He admits that they can't explain the physics and then reverts to it possibly being from an adversary or one of our own USG projects. And doesn't suggest that it may very well be something truly anomalous.) Ross: The WSJ says, in the 1960s, live, thermonuclear weapons were tested against EMPs. Do you find that plausible? I couldn't believe the USAF would do that. Rounds: I know we've done a great deal of research with regard to EMPs. We've had to study EMPs as a weapon system and our adversaries have looked at them as a weapon system. EMPs would do damage to electronic equipment but not to humans or structures. (Welp. He obviously finds it plausible.) Ross: How about enhancing the whistleblower protections? Rounds: "I don't know that the existing protections fail us." Ross: What about AARO? Rounds: I met with AARO leaders and found them to be frank and open, "I don't have any evidence that says that there's in any way a desire to limit their ability to do research or to hide the information that they're doing. " (Bring in Kosloski and ask him if he told James Fox that he had to get approval from the DOD even if he just wanted to part his hair.) Ross: Rubio said we've had repeated instances of something operating over restricted nuclear facilities, and it's not ours. And we don't know whose it is. Any kind of craft over sensitive national security sites is a national security threat. Rounds: I don't disagree. But I don't know if it's ours or if it belongs to one of our adversaries. And if it's neither, then I don't know whose it is. I'm not gonna jump to conclusions and I'm gonna keep my options open. I wanna make sure that if it's something one of our organizations in the US actually is testing or working with that we not disclose it. If it belongs to one of our adversaries, we wanna make sure that we have all of the information we can gather on it and be prepared to defend against it. "And if there's something that is neither ours nor theirs, it belongs some place else, then my curiousity really starts to grow at that state of the game and I wanna be open to those possibilities as well."

Joe Murgia

19,787 просмотров • 1 год назад

𝗨𝗻𝗮𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 [ uhn-uh-wair ] 𝘢𝘥𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 not knowing that something exists, or not having knowledge of something _____________ A collaboration between @theminiastudios and me #sizetwitter #giantess #サイズフェチ
0:30

Sensitive content

𝗨𝗻𝗮𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 [ uhn-uh-wair ] 𝘢𝘥𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 not knowing that something exists, or not having knowledge of something _____________ A collaboration between @theminiastudios and me #sizetwitter #giantess #サイズフェチ

Elle

96,980 просмотров • 1 год назад

“We talked to a number of homeless illegal aliens who told us firsthand that they were getting free transgender sex surgeries from the State of California. It’s something that is so deranged, yet the governor himself confirms that they’re proud to do it.”
3:37

“We talked to a number of homeless illegal aliens who told us firsthand that they were getting free transgender sex surgeries from the State of California. It’s something that is so deranged, yet the governor himself confirms that they’re proud to do it.”

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️

45,486 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

WOW 🚨 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the Democrats CHANGED THE STANDARD for impeachment right before impeaching Trump They changed it so evidence no longer had to be credible, just to get Trump Literally Treason “So in the lead up to the impeachment of President Trump, the standard was, it had to be firsthand information. And then right before he happened to go through this impeachment process, the standard changed to being able to use secondhand information, even if it were unreliable and deemed unreliable” “Inspector General did from requiring that there be either evidence or firsthand knowledge presented in order to determine whether or not a complaint is credible to merely allowing for hearsay and nothing else” “How do you find a complaint to be credible when there is zero evidence provided and there is zero firsthand knowledge provided, not only by the whistleblower, by any witness in this case and when the Inspector General himself did not even request to see the documents that these individuals are referencing in their false accusations” Democrats literally changed it so it didn’t have to be first hand knowledge, and you need no evidence to make a claim for impeachment And not a single person has been held accountable for this
1:36

WOW 🚨 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the Democrats CHANGED THE STANDARD for impeachment right before impeaching Trump They changed it so evidence no longer had to be credible, just to get Trump Literally Treason “So in the lead up to the impeachment of President Trump, the standard was, it had to be firsthand information. And then right before he happened to go through this impeachment process, the standard changed to being able to use secondhand information, even if it were unreliable and deemed unreliable” “Inspector General did from requiring that there be either evidence or firsthand knowledge presented in order to determine whether or not a complaint is credible to merely allowing for hearsay and nothing else” “How do you find a complaint to be credible when there is zero evidence provided and there is zero firsthand knowledge provided, not only by the whistleblower, by any witness in this case and when the Inspector General himself did not even request to see the documents that these individuals are referencing in their false accusations” Democrats literally changed it so it didn’t have to be first hand knowledge, and you need no evidence to make a claim for impeachment And not a single person has been held accountable for this

Wall Street Apes

393,056 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨Ross Coulthart was asked directly about UAP Gerb's claims regarding the location of alleged non human biologics. He confirms that Dugway Proving Ground in Utah is a real site of interest, and that sources with claimed firsthand knowledge of legacy UAP programs do place activity there. But he's clear on one point, that Dugway is not the primary site. The key facility, according to Coulthart, remains an underground location that is still being deliberately kept secret.
4:37

🚨Ross Coulthart was asked directly about UAP Gerb's claims regarding the location of alleged non human biologics. He confirms that Dugway Proving Ground in Utah is a real site of interest, and that sources with claimed firsthand knowledge of legacy UAP programs do place activity there. But he's clear on one point, that Dugway is not the primary site. The key facility, according to Coulthart, remains an underground location that is still being deliberately kept secret.

Skywatch Signal

45,423 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"Now you have firsthand knowledge of what, probably, the top of the NFC looks like right now. That's them." -Lions HC Dan Campbell after loss to Rams
0:28

"Now you have firsthand knowledge of what, probably, the top of the NFC looks like right now. That's them." -Lions HC Dan Campbell after loss to Rams

FOX Sports: NFL

210,862 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

With The Fifth Column 🖐 talking about common knowledge: “Common knowledge can be generated at a stroke when something is witnessed in a forum where you can witness other people witnessing it. So if something just happens in public and you can see everyone else seeing it, that gives you an instant intuition that there’s common knowledge. Humor, I suggest in one of the chapters, is a common-knowledge generator, usually of some infirmity or indignity or weakness in someone or something. And the laughter, which is conspicuous—you can hear it when someone is laughing; it interrupts their speech and breathing—at the moment of laughter, suddenly becomes common knowledge. Everyone who gets the joke suddenly realizes that someone has been taken down, and they realize that everyone else realizes it. And that’s why freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are suppressed in autocracies. The joke from the Soviet era is about the man handing out leaflets in Red Square. Of course, the KGB arrest him, take him down to headquarters, only to discover that the leaflets are blank sheets of paper. They say, ‘What is the meaning of this?’ And he says, ‘What’s there to say? It’s so obvious.’ And the reason that it was subversive is that he was generating common knowledge. Just the mere fact of trying to make something public, even if you don’t have to stipulate what it is, can generate the coordination—everyone acting together to bring down a regime.”
1:18

With The Fifth Column 🖐 talking about common knowledge: “Common knowledge can be generated at a stroke when something is witnessed in a forum where you can witness other people witnessing it. So if something just happens in public and you can see everyone else seeing it, that gives you an instant intuition that there’s common knowledge. Humor, I suggest in one of the chapters, is a common-knowledge generator, usually of some infirmity or indignity or weakness in someone or something. And the laughter, which is conspicuous—you can hear it when someone is laughing; it interrupts their speech and breathing—at the moment of laughter, suddenly becomes common knowledge. Everyone who gets the joke suddenly realizes that someone has been taken down, and they realize that everyone else realizes it. And that’s why freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are suppressed in autocracies. The joke from the Soviet era is about the man handing out leaflets in Red Square. Of course, the KGB arrest him, take him down to headquarters, only to discover that the leaflets are blank sheets of paper. They say, ‘What is the meaning of this?’ And he says, ‘What’s there to say? It’s so obvious.’ And the reason that it was subversive is that he was generating common knowledge. Just the mere fact of trying to make something public, even if you don’t have to stipulate what it is, can generate the coordination—everyone acting together to bring down a regime.”

Steven Pinker

44,931 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

USAF Vet. & Whistleblower Dylan Borland (Dylan Borland) "Crimes that have been committed, sexual assaults that I’m aware of, stalking I’m aware of, break lines that have been cut. I have direct firsthand knowledge of and exposure to (UAP & NHI of Non Human Origin) crash recovery, reverse engineering, as well as the most important technology on the planet and it’s not the craft themselves."
0:28

USAF Vet. & Whistleblower Dylan Borland (Dylan Borland) "Crimes that have been committed, sexual assaults that I’m aware of, stalking I’m aware of, break lines that have been cut. I have direct firsthand knowledge of and exposure to (UAP & NHI of Non Human Origin) crash recovery, reverse engineering, as well as the most important technology on the planet and it’s not the craft themselves."

Tio Red Octo 🐙 W. κρυπτός 𒀭𒀀𒉣𒈾 🜃Φ🌹🇵🇸𓂀 🪬

10,626 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Jeremy Corbell says he George Knapp have provided firsthand UAP whistleblowers who have “close proximity to operational UAP in their military role and capacity” for pre-vetting ahead of the upcoming hearing.
0:55

Jeremy Corbell says he George Knapp have provided firsthand UAP whistleblowers who have “close proximity to operational UAP in their military role and capacity” for pre-vetting ahead of the upcoming hearing.

UAP James

47,856 просмотров • 1 год назад

I hope they do something special for the rotoscope scenes, either something visual or audible.. because they are such an important part of the horror that it’d be a shame to not highlight them like the games do. there’s an opportunity to do something very cool with this.
1:15

I hope they do something special for the rotoscope scenes, either something visual or audible.. because they are such an important part of the horror that it’d be a shame to not highlight them like the games do. there’s an opportunity to do something very cool with this.

zaso ✟ 📹

153,289 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”
2:29

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

Arjun Khemani

10,523 просмотров • 1 год назад

Rep. Burlison says the UAP hearing was delayed in part because they want witnesses who have firsthand experience with non-human intelligence to testify. “What’s frustrating is that people that claim, and will go on national news, many of them are not willing to come in and be under oath.”
1:04

Rep. Burlison says the UAP hearing was delayed in part because they want witnesses who have firsthand experience with non-human intelligence to testify. “What’s frustrating is that people that claim, and will go on national news, many of them are not willing to come in and be under oath.”

UAP James

41,201 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад