Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Route Handlers vs Server Actions for data fetching

250,089 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля Barzi Ahmed
Barzi Ahmed1 год назад

I didn't understand at all. The post lacks context and details. Is video complimenting Server Actions or the opposite?

Фото профиля Alex Sidorenko
Alex Sidorenko1 год назад

Server actions are not great for fetching data from client components as they execute sequentially. The good default is to fetch data in server components when possible and pass it to the client components when needed. When it's impossible/doesn't make sense to fetch in server component (select autocomplete, AI streaming, etc...) it's better to use good old route handlers. Server actions are designed for mutations

Фото профиля Barzi Ahmed
Barzi Ahmed1 год назад

It's just getting very complicated. @trpcio and @jullerino often say you might not need tRPC if you're using Server Actions, and now Next.js team here say it's bad and etc. It's API! It's not a joke. Please settle urselves and tell us what to choose without mights and maybes.

Фото профиля Fitim Bytyqi
Fitim Bytyqi1 год назад

Finally, someone making a video about it 🙌 That’s what pushed me to use TRPC because creating route handlers is too much work for me!

Фото профиля Yash Suryawanshi
Yash Suryawanshi1 год назад

Route Handlers are more flexible for complex scenarios, while Server Actions are simpler and better for straightforward data fetching tasks.

Фото профиля Barzi Ahmed
Barzi Ahmed1 год назад

@t3dotgg ?? You said trpc is optional and etcetera!

Фото профиля Umair
Umair1 год назад

This is more clear

Фото профиля Kamlesh Paul
Kamlesh Paul1 год назад

we can use server component to fetch data and suspense to show loading ui

Фото профиля Apu
Apu1 год назад

I kinda wonder why they didn't go full trpc style and just use them for everything..

Похожие видео