Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Royston talks about a recent DM article about William spending time with friends, and there being 'palace concern' that he's not doing much royal work overseas. Royston's comments are interesting, but not very well thought out. Couple of things... He says William is leaving his celebrity brother an open... goal, by not doing as much overseas work representing the monarchy, and that Harry could really 'cash in'. He later says Harry doing this cosplay could 'turn Charles' head to the possibility of Harry doing more work for the monarchy'. I don't understand how this would help, or strengthen the monarchy. (Or what Royston means exactly **) The snapshot of the last half century or so of the monarchy - the different families, the lifestyles and working arrangements of titled and untitled family members (and all the issues involved), the media and everything else, demonstrate the need for change. If that means a streamlined monarchy with fewer family members representing the institution on the world stage, then fine. Nothing about Harry, both 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗱 and 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗲 suggests he's able to be relied upon, or that he respects the role of the monarchy beyond how it can benefit him personally. He and his US wife are two of the most unstable, unpopular and divisive family members. They have demonstrated they can not and will not understand or respect the hierarchy of the monarchy. His titles and his status paired with his lifelong lack of responsibility and accountability has resulted in the same problematic issues as we currently see in his uncle. full epshow more

mrc 🦇

7,734 subscribers

11,870 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I found Royston's comments quite interesting, like so many other commentators he's managed to place all responsibility of what occurred on William and Catherine's shoulders, as well as suggesting it is their 𝘥𝘶𝘵𝘺 to repair the relationship (meaning 'get over it') So many thoughts.. 🤔 Notice that Royston says Harry 'does talk about a lot of stuff'. And 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 everything H has talked about - what he has said, and how that has impacted his family. Especially William, Catherine and their young children. Then Royston talks about there being times Queen Elizabeth had needed to put the 'national interest' and the 'country's interest' above her feelings as a person, and above the interests as her family. And that King Charles as monarch will need to do the same. But Royston then goes on to say it's in the Royal family's interests to solve their own family problems, and that they are supposed to show 'leadership' in Britain. And that it's not leadership, or healthy, advisable or wise to let conflict escalate and escalate, and that the public think families should be able to resolve conflict. So he's suggesting the family are not fulfilling their role by having 'unresolved' issues with Harry. He said QE had put her family (Andrew) aside for the best interest of the monarchy and nation, but he seems to believe that either KC or PW putting Harry aside (after doing everything he's done) is not in the best interests. Notice the different expectations for each problematic son? (What Royston says next he's previously talked about, when discussing H+Ms work with bullying. That the issues in KP demonstrated H+M's inability to resolve issues) 🤨 I have so many issues with Royston's comments. He says it's not good to have things 'escalate'. But things 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 escalating now, certainly not by William and Catherine's doing. Grey rocking is working. Royston seems to place responsibly for what happened in those two years (and since then) on William and Catherine, and KP. But we now know there were so many other issues occurring at the same time, that the problems were bigger than simply workplace squabbles. And when you consider 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦 that had happened in the decades 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 and the years 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 2017 - 2019, it's ridiculous to suggest this can be summed up as a 'workplace issue' at KP. I place a lot of responsibility for what happened with Harry and M on QE as monarch, and KC as father. H has had a lifetime of issues, and these were poorly managed by both his family and the monarchy. He is jealous, unstable, bitter and vengeful. And she is a histrionic narcissist. Harry and M were poorly handled, from the start. It should not have been KPs responsibility to manage them or deal with them. Anyone with any awareness of what has transpired over the last 𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 knows what Harry and his wife have done. William and Catherine have wisely set boundaries to protect themselves and their children. It's cruel to suggest they should risk their wellbeing, and what they are building and protecting for the children. William is not his brother's keeper. People need to stop infantilising Harry, who is in his 5th decade. He made his decisions - not every relationship can or should be repaired back to the way it was.

I found Royston's comments quite interesting, like so many other commentators he's managed to place all responsibility of what occurred on William and Catherine's shoulders, as well as suggesting it is their 𝘥𝘶𝘵𝘺 to repair the relationship (meaning 'get over it') So many thoughts.. 🤔 Notice that Royston says Harry 'does talk about a lot of stuff'. And 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 everything H has talked about - what he has said, and how that has impacted his family. Especially William, Catherine and their young children. Then Royston talks about there being times Queen Elizabeth had needed to put the 'national interest' and the 'country's interest' above her feelings as a person, and above the interests as her family. And that King Charles as monarch will need to do the same. But Royston then goes on to say it's in the Royal family's interests to solve their own family problems, and that they are supposed to show 'leadership' in Britain. And that it's not leadership, or healthy, advisable or wise to let conflict escalate and escalate, and that the public think families should be able to resolve conflict. So he's suggesting the family are not fulfilling their role by having 'unresolved' issues with Harry. He said QE had put her family (Andrew) aside for the best interest of the monarchy and nation, but he seems to believe that either KC or PW putting Harry aside (after doing everything he's done) is not in the best interests. Notice the different expectations for each problematic son? (What Royston says next he's previously talked about, when discussing H+Ms work with bullying. That the issues in KP demonstrated H+M's inability to resolve issues) 🤨 I have so many issues with Royston's comments. He says it's not good to have things 'escalate'. But things 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 escalating now, certainly not by William and Catherine's doing. Grey rocking is working. Royston seems to place responsibly for what happened in those two years (and since then) on William and Catherine, and KP. But we now know there were so many other issues occurring at the same time, that the problems were bigger than simply workplace squabbles. And when you consider 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦 that had happened in the decades 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 and the years 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 2017 - 2019, it's ridiculous to suggest this can be summed up as a 'workplace issue' at KP. I place a lot of responsibility for what happened with Harry and M on QE as monarch, and KC as father. H has had a lifetime of issues, and these were poorly managed by both his family and the monarchy. He is jealous, unstable, bitter and vengeful. And she is a histrionic narcissist. Harry and M were poorly handled, from the start. It should not have been KPs responsibility to manage them or deal with them. Anyone with any awareness of what has transpired over the last 𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 knows what Harry and his wife have done. William and Catherine have wisely set boundaries to protect themselves and their children. It's cruel to suggest they should risk their wellbeing, and what they are building and protecting for the children. William is not his brother's keeper. People need to stop infantilising Harry, who is in his 5th decade. He made his decisions - not every relationship can or should be repaired back to the way it was.

mrc 🦇

11,484 views • 11 months ago

“The thing I would say about the monarchy, is William is not a good advertisement for the monarchy, both personally and in terms of any kind of intellectual hinterland. He is going to run the institution of the monarchy into the ground when he becomes king” No one trusts Willy.

“The thing I would say about the monarchy, is William is not a good advertisement for the monarchy, both personally and in terms of any kind of intellectual hinterland. He is going to run the institution of the monarchy into the ground when he becomes king” No one trusts Willy.

Carmella

24,427 views • 4 months ago

This interview reveals part of Omid Scobie’s real agenda! If you listen to the end, it’s clear his (likely) mission from Harry and Meghan with ‘Endgame’ is to throw attention off of the cosplay royals by sowing tension between Charles and William, with William being the ultimate bad guy! Scobie clearly hates William and hopes to see him fall out with his father, much like Harry already did with Charles. This guy is all about his own anti-monarchy agenda and nothing else. He even contradicts himself by claiming it was seemingly terrible for William to perhaps want a more progressive Coronation that reflects modern Britain, when Scobie criticized the monarchy for not reflecting the modern monarchy just a couple of weeks ago (using almost the exact same language). How anyone can take this guy seriously remains beyond me.

This interview reveals part of Omid Scobie’s real agenda! If you listen to the end, it’s clear his (likely) mission from Harry and Meghan with ‘Endgame’ is to throw attention off of the cosplay royals by sowing tension between Charles and William, with William being the ultimate bad guy! Scobie clearly hates William and hopes to see him fall out with his father, much like Harry already did with Charles. This guy is all about his own anti-monarchy agenda and nothing else. He even contradicts himself by claiming it was seemingly terrible for William to perhaps want a more progressive Coronation that reflects modern Britain, when Scobie criticized the monarchy for not reflecting the modern monarchy just a couple of weeks ago (using almost the exact same language). How anyone can take this guy seriously remains beyond me.

Royal News Network

307,579 views • 2 years ago

6 years, to the exact date when the Royal family instructed the UK media to open full on war on Prince Harry and Meghan. 6yrs of the British monarchy hiding 10s of thousands of emails, about Prince Andrew’s betrayal of his country and his monarchy, while monstering the Sussexes.

6 years, to the exact date when the Royal family instructed the UK media to open full on war on Prince Harry and Meghan. 6yrs of the British monarchy hiding 10s of thousands of emails, about Prince Andrew’s betrayal of his country and his monarchy, while monstering the Sussexes.

Carmella

18,310 views • 1 month ago

THE INHERENT CRUELTY OF THE MONARCHY!! “They (Prince Harry and Meghan) are enormously appealing to the public….and are very good at it. What a pity it is they’ve gone….I think they (the Royal Family) needed Harry and Meghan” The same reporters that recognised that Harry and Meghan were the jewel in the crown for the Royal Family are the same ones that cyber bullied them daily for shit, giggles and clicks making it seem like they were God awful while having this green light by the family to do this. A family that also recognised Harry and Meghan were doing good things for the monarchy but targeted them out of jealousy. There is something fundamentally cruel about the monarchy that expect spares and royal wives to suffer. But its arrogance is that they don’t expect their victims to be able to escape, and when they try, just like King Charles did, they blackmail them with more cruelty - taking away security, evicting them from secure homes gifted to them- ramping up the media abuse from their reporters. The monarchy is a hierarchical system built not on service but ego, cruelty and pain. Thanks for the vid Carmella #TinaBrown #CruelMonarchy #RoyalFamilyIsACult

THE INHERENT CRUELTY OF THE MONARCHY!! “They (Prince Harry and Meghan) are enormously appealing to the public….and are very good at it. What a pity it is they’ve gone….I think they (the Royal Family) needed Harry and Meghan” The same reporters that recognised that Harry and Meghan were the jewel in the crown for the Royal Family are the same ones that cyber bullied them daily for shit, giggles and clicks making it seem like they were God awful while having this green light by the family to do this. A family that also recognised Harry and Meghan were doing good things for the monarchy but targeted them out of jealousy. There is something fundamentally cruel about the monarchy that expect spares and royal wives to suffer. But its arrogance is that they don’t expect their victims to be able to escape, and when they try, just like King Charles did, they blackmail them with more cruelty - taking away security, evicting them from secure homes gifted to them- ramping up the media abuse from their reporters. The monarchy is a hierarchical system built not on service but ego, cruelty and pain. Thanks for the vid Carmella #TinaBrown #CruelMonarchy #RoyalFamilyIsACult

Glow Lee

25,183 views • 2 months ago

Still a member of the royal family and the sooner everyone can get that through their minds … Harry stabbed his grandmother in the back and he continues to arrogantly do what he wants, when he wants, however he wants. All staged, performative, transactional abuse of not just the royal family but of our country, culture and traditions, our constitutional monarchy. Thanks to Savanna for catching this:

Still a member of the royal family and the sooner everyone can get that through their minds … Harry stabbed his grandmother in the back and he continues to arrogantly do what he wants, when he wants, however he wants. All staged, performative, transactional abuse of not just the royal family but of our country, culture and traditions, our constitutional monarchy. Thanks to Savanna for catching this:

jen

117,943 views • 2 months ago

“There is a Harry-shaped hole in the monarchy” Journalist and editor Tina Brown says “we needed Harry and Meghan” but that she worries the rift between them and the rest of the Royal Family could be permanent #BBCLauraK

“There is a Harry-shaped hole in the monarchy” Journalist and editor Tina Brown says “we needed Harry and Meghan” but that she worries the rift between them and the rest of the Royal Family could be permanent #BBCLauraK

BBC Politics

764,455 views • 2 years ago

1/2. Matt Wilkinson, Sarah Hewson and JJ Anisiobi on Royal Exclusive, talking about 'what's needed for the celebrities to return'. Few thoughts... Seeing as William was correct in his initial assessment of Harry and Markle's relationship, and of US celebrity Markle's fame ambition and suitability for the British institution of monarchy, and seeing as nothing has changed - by all reports Harry still enables, protects and participates in Markle's poor behaviour, - Harry still has personal grievances and publicly shared issues with William and with his place in the hierarchy (and William's place will only increase in seniority), - and Markle is just as ruthlessly fame hungry as she was, and considering the fact that thanks to Harry and Markle's actions, things are now a lot worse than they were 𝗮𝗹𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗴𝗼, why would William, at this time in his and his wife and children's lives, expel time and energy into them returning? All things considered, why would he risk it, either for himself, his family, or the institution? With the precarious position the institution is in, and the instability and untrustworthiness of the US celebrities, who in their right mind would risk it? And also, on JJ's comments that all it would take is 'Catherine to publicly support Markle', I disagree. I wouldn't support their return, regardless of what William and Catherine said or did. full ep

1/2. Matt Wilkinson, Sarah Hewson and JJ Anisiobi on Royal Exclusive, talking about 'what's needed for the celebrities to return'. Few thoughts... Seeing as William was correct in his initial assessment of Harry and Markle's relationship, and of US celebrity Markle's fame ambition and suitability for the British institution of monarchy, and seeing as nothing has changed - by all reports Harry still enables, protects and participates in Markle's poor behaviour, - Harry still has personal grievances and publicly shared issues with William and with his place in the hierarchy (and William's place will only increase in seniority), - and Markle is just as ruthlessly fame hungry as she was, and considering the fact that thanks to Harry and Markle's actions, things are now a lot worse than they were 𝗮𝗹𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗴𝗼, why would William, at this time in his and his wife and children's lives, expel time and energy into them returning? All things considered, why would he risk it, either for himself, his family, or the institution? With the precarious position the institution is in, and the instability and untrustworthiness of the US celebrities, who in their right mind would risk it? And also, on JJ's comments that all it would take is 'Catherine to publicly support Markle', I disagree. I wouldn't support their return, regardless of what William and Catherine said or did. full ep

mrc 🦇

12,505 views • 3 months ago

Author, journalist and historian Tariq Ali talks about abolishing the monarchy. He said, “There is no reason for the monarchy.” Is it time for a referendum about the future of the royal family?…. Such as a abolish…. yes or no vote?

Author, journalist and historian Tariq Ali talks about abolishing the monarchy. He said, “There is no reason for the monarchy.” Is it time for a referendum about the future of the royal family?…. Such as a abolish…. yes or no vote?

Zara Hussain

33,997 views • 7 months ago

🚨 THE FUTURE OF THE MONARCHY AT STAKE Hilary Fordwich🇺🇸 🇬🇧: “This is an existential threat to the royal family.” In his statement, King Charles III did not refer to Andrew as his brother — only as “Andrew Windsor Mountbatten.” “It’s always what they say, but also what they don’t say.” And behind the scenes? “Prince William has zero tolerance.” “He has the high moral ground here because he is not involved in the slightest.” Is this the line in the sand for the monarchy?

🚨 THE FUTURE OF THE MONARCHY AT STAKE Hilary Fordwich🇺🇸 🇬🇧: “This is an existential threat to the royal family.” In his statement, King Charles III did not refer to Andrew as his brother — only as “Andrew Windsor Mountbatten.” “It’s always what they say, but also what they don’t say.” And behind the scenes? “Prince William has zero tolerance.” “He has the high moral ground here because he is not involved in the slightest.” Is this the line in the sand for the monarchy?

Laura Ingraham

74,491 views • 4 months ago

Oh the British Press and Royal Rota are fuming at being blindsided by Prince William🤭 Unlike any Heir before him, Prince William bypassed the national BBC, he bypassed the national ITV; He did not even grant this interview to any of the major British reporters or newspapers. The Palace and their sources did not even know his plans thus, there was no leaks to the Daily Mail..😏 William blindsided everyone and went on the most unlikely platform, the TV show of a Canadian actor and comedian, to discuss give his most important interview to date as Prince of Wales and discuss his plans for the Monarchy and Catherine🔥 There are two topics that William never discussed with the press: his future plans for the Monarchy AND his wife Catherine. Yet today, he discussed protecting his beloved wife and their family; as well as his plans for the institution the monarchy❤️ Apple TV got the call. Not “Fleet Street”; and Fleet Street is reeling. Prince William is very intentional and he sent a clear message to the British press, Royal Rota and palace sources that has been harassing him and his wife at every turn: He is the one in control🔥 He can work with them or find another mean. He decides, not them, not courtiers, Him. He will not be dictated by them or take any marching orders from them. He is not afraid to draw the line and make the changes he sees fit, no matter how tough the decisions🤷🏽‍♀️ This unexpected interview is a preview of what is to come. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, who was just invited to the state Banquet 2 weeks ago, knows that unlike the CEO of Netflix, he has hit the jackpot with this episode and all that money is going straight to Apple. William does not need the money, he has plenty. What he needed was the platform and Apple and their crew did an excellent job at NOT LEAKING anything until it was time to promote the show👌🏽 The Netflix CEO got two peanuts for millions of dollars; The Apple CEO got an “in” with the Future King himself and he is keeping all the money; a Tale of Kings and court Jesters..🪭 I love this scene posted by Apple TV. Prince William knew he was about to hurt a lot of feelings in the palace and the British Press and he was so relax about it, taking selfies and enjoying a Guinness; A true mastermind at heart😎 As he reiterated confidently: “I take my roles and my responsibilities seriously but it's important you don't feel they own you. You have to own them”🔥 Spoken like a man born to be King☕️ #PrinceWilliamisAKing 📹Apple TV

Oh the British Press and Royal Rota are fuming at being blindsided by Prince William🤭 Unlike any Heir before him, Prince William bypassed the national BBC, he bypassed the national ITV; He did not even grant this interview to any of the major British reporters or newspapers. The Palace and their sources did not even know his plans thus, there was no leaks to the Daily Mail..😏 William blindsided everyone and went on the most unlikely platform, the TV show of a Canadian actor and comedian, to discuss give his most important interview to date as Prince of Wales and discuss his plans for the Monarchy and Catherine🔥 There are two topics that William never discussed with the press: his future plans for the Monarchy AND his wife Catherine. Yet today, he discussed protecting his beloved wife and their family; as well as his plans for the institution the monarchy❤️ Apple TV got the call. Not “Fleet Street”; and Fleet Street is reeling. Prince William is very intentional and he sent a clear message to the British press, Royal Rota and palace sources that has been harassing him and his wife at every turn: He is the one in control🔥 He can work with them or find another mean. He decides, not them, not courtiers, Him. He will not be dictated by them or take any marching orders from them. He is not afraid to draw the line and make the changes he sees fit, no matter how tough the decisions🤷🏽‍♀️ This unexpected interview is a preview of what is to come. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, who was just invited to the state Banquet 2 weeks ago, knows that unlike the CEO of Netflix, he has hit the jackpot with this episode and all that money is going straight to Apple. William does not need the money, he has plenty. What he needed was the platform and Apple and their crew did an excellent job at NOT LEAKING anything until it was time to promote the show👌🏽 The Netflix CEO got two peanuts for millions of dollars; The Apple CEO got an “in” with the Future King himself and he is keeping all the money; a Tale of Kings and court Jesters..🪭 I love this scene posted by Apple TV. Prince William knew he was about to hurt a lot of feelings in the palace and the British Press and he was so relax about it, taking selfies and enjoying a Guinness; A true mastermind at heart😎 As he reiterated confidently: “I take my roles and my responsibilities seriously but it's important you don't feel they own you. You have to own them”🔥 Spoken like a man born to be King☕️ #PrinceWilliamisAKing 📹Apple TV

Canellecitadelle

734,463 views • 9 months ago

Everyone is finally saying the quiet part out loud. “William is not a very good advertisement for the monarchy, both personally and in terms of any intellectual hinterland. He is going to run the institution of the monarchy to the ground when he becomes King.” - Alex Larman

Everyone is finally saying the quiet part out loud. “William is not a very good advertisement for the monarchy, both personally and in terms of any intellectual hinterland. He is going to run the institution of the monarchy to the ground when he becomes King.” - Alex Larman

Senior Lieutenant Zandi Sussex

26,920 views • 4 months ago

Tell me how this half half grift is still going on? A Californian celebrity family (of over six years), living, working, politicking, raising their children in a foreign country that is not a constitutional monarchy. With full British titles, styles, and official constitutional status ... and it's looking they'll get taxpayer funded security. Very public careers and commercial businesses, all for personal profit. Selling public appearances, goods and entertainment - tv shows, podcasts, all as 'members of the British royal family'. Globally and diplomatically platformed (and likely funded) by an organisation supporting military, established by British monarchy and government, and the position given to this Californian celebrity because he was a member of the British monarchy. No, we don't know how the King will support IG. But any public appearance with the Californian celebrities is an endorsement of the royal status they sell, as well as their commercial interests. I just can't with this anymore 😑 If you want my respect, earn it.

Tell me how this half half grift is still going on? A Californian celebrity family (of over six years), living, working, politicking, raising their children in a foreign country that is not a constitutional monarchy. With full British titles, styles, and official constitutional status ... and it's looking they'll get taxpayer funded security. Very public careers and commercial businesses, all for personal profit. Selling public appearances, goods and entertainment - tv shows, podcasts, all as 'members of the British royal family'. Globally and diplomatically platformed (and likely funded) by an organisation supporting military, established by British monarchy and government, and the position given to this Californian celebrity because he was a member of the British monarchy. No, we don't know how the King will support IG. But any public appearance with the Californian celebrities is an endorsement of the royal status they sell, as well as their commercial interests. I just can't with this anymore 😑 If you want my respect, earn it.

mrc 🦇

16,693 views • 3 months ago

“The royal family needs Prince Harry, Harry doesn’t really need the royal family.” Nina Obviously the right wing twat spouts delusion that Harry misses the U.K., regrets leaving, Meghan gave him a wrist burn to do it and that he left for ‘ridiculous’ reasons. That does fascinate me. If Harry’s reasons for leaving as a working royal why do these twats get so angry about his interviews and memoir and say they were damaging to the monarchy? 🤔 Ridiculous reasons are damaging? I think it’s time to do a list of these reasons and see just how ridiculous they are.

“The royal family needs Prince Harry, Harry doesn’t really need the royal family.” Nina Obviously the right wing twat spouts delusion that Harry misses the U.K., regrets leaving, Meghan gave him a wrist burn to do it and that he left for ‘ridiculous’ reasons. That does fascinate me. If Harry’s reasons for leaving as a working royal why do these twats get so angry about his interviews and memoir and say they were damaging to the monarchy? 🤔 Ridiculous reasons are damaging? I think it’s time to do a list of these reasons and see just how ridiculous they are.

Glow Lee

24,918 views • 10 months ago

ROYAL REPORTER JENNIE BOND CHANGES HER MIND AND NOW SUPPORTS PRINCE HARRY GETTING TAX PAYER FUNDED SECURITY BACK FOR VISITS TO THE UK!!! This is not compassion or fairness based. It’s because the first response of a royalist is vengeful vindictiveness. Jennie has previouslyexpressed concerned that William and Kate offer no sparkle to the monarchy, all the other royals are old or uninteresting and despite H&M being run out because they are a dynamic and engaging royal couple, that’s the very reason they’re needed to bring some magic back to the monarchy. So her change of heart is not out of fairness to Harry. It’s for the survival of the monarchy. Nb. The lady panellist is a left wing monarchist who thinks ‘bad behaviour’ is finally telling your own story and defunding yourself after years of briefings and false stories put out against you by your own family.

ROYAL REPORTER JENNIE BOND CHANGES HER MIND AND NOW SUPPORTS PRINCE HARRY GETTING TAX PAYER FUNDED SECURITY BACK FOR VISITS TO THE UK!!! This is not compassion or fairness based. It’s because the first response of a royalist is vengeful vindictiveness. Jennie has previouslyexpressed concerned that William and Kate offer no sparkle to the monarchy, all the other royals are old or uninteresting and despite H&M being run out because they are a dynamic and engaging royal couple, that’s the very reason they’re needed to bring some magic back to the monarchy. So her change of heart is not out of fairness to Harry. It’s for the survival of the monarchy. Nb. The lady panellist is a left wing monarchist who thinks ‘bad behaviour’ is finally telling your own story and defunding yourself after years of briefings and false stories put out against you by your own family.

Glow Lee

51,490 views • 7 months ago

I absolutely adore the Frenzy in Washington among politicians no less, around the Royal visit by the King🔥👌🏽 And they told you that the British Monarchy is not relevant. And they told you that Prince Andrew had ended the monarchy..😏 There is no Monarchy or institution that commends more attention and prestige around the world than the British Monarchy and that is why every hater attacks them in vain..😎🇬🇧

I absolutely adore the Frenzy in Washington among politicians no less, around the Royal visit by the King🔥👌🏽 And they told you that the British Monarchy is not relevant. And they told you that Prince Andrew had ended the monarchy..😏 There is no Monarchy or institution that commends more attention and prestige around the world than the British Monarchy and that is why every hater attacks them in vain..😎🇬🇧

Canellecitadelle

76,841 views • 2 months ago

With the royal family, their spouses & their children living, breathing and well not doing much, right there in Britain, the UK press overlooks them all, yep the entire bunch to write/talk about Prince Harry and Meghan Sussex all day, daily. What does that mean for the monarchy?

With the royal family, their spouses & their children living, breathing and well not doing much, right there in Britain, the UK press overlooks them all, yep the entire bunch to write/talk about Prince Harry and Meghan Sussex all day, daily. What does that mean for the monarchy?

Carmella

34,191 views • 1 year ago

1. I've seen some pushback from a few monarchists, or possibly fans of KC, who complain that people will never be satisfied, or that people are 'wanting blood', or 'wanted things to change yet are still complaining'. My issue with all this is not only that Andrew was the one to make the statement, and frame it the way he did (including speaking for His Majesty), but also that these changes aren't changes. Not really. Yes, people can explain the semantics of titles and abeyance and wherever else, but what is clear to many people is that nothing more will be, or can be, done. That the 'status' the gave him the opportunity to carry out these immoral (and possibly criminal) decisions and actions cannot be taken away. He was born a prince, born with a place in the LoS, and that will remain. He has status afforded to him that cannot be removed. The rest is just shuffling words around in press releases and conflicting headlines. And because of the very public actions of the Californian celebrities, we know how meaningless it is. 🤷🏻‍♀️ so we're told nothing more can be done. Or doing more involves parliament, which beings some risk for the monarchy. Which means, to protect itself the institution should not push any further. And that we should be satisfied with press releases that suggest change but we know don't actually mean change. 🤷🏻‍♀️ The problem I have is that this goes against my own views and values. About people in senior positions of power in any institution or dynamic, whether it be a family, a local supermarket workplace or a monarchy, using that position to exploit or victimise others. Yes, this is Roya. But most commentators are acknowledging it.

1. I've seen some pushback from a few monarchists, or possibly fans of KC, who complain that people will never be satisfied, or that people are 'wanting blood', or 'wanted things to change yet are still complaining'. My issue with all this is not only that Andrew was the one to make the statement, and frame it the way he did (including speaking for His Majesty), but also that these changes aren't changes. Not really. Yes, people can explain the semantics of titles and abeyance and wherever else, but what is clear to many people is that nothing more will be, or can be, done. That the 'status' the gave him the opportunity to carry out these immoral (and possibly criminal) decisions and actions cannot be taken away. He was born a prince, born with a place in the LoS, and that will remain. He has status afforded to him that cannot be removed. The rest is just shuffling words around in press releases and conflicting headlines. And because of the very public actions of the Californian celebrities, we know how meaningless it is. 🤷🏻‍♀️ so we're told nothing more can be done. Or doing more involves parliament, which beings some risk for the monarchy. Which means, to protect itself the institution should not push any further. And that we should be satisfied with press releases that suggest change but we know don't actually mean change. 🤷🏻‍♀️ The problem I have is that this goes against my own views and values. About people in senior positions of power in any institution or dynamic, whether it be a family, a local supermarket workplace or a monarchy, using that position to exploit or victimise others. Yes, this is Roya. But most commentators are acknowledging it.

mrc 🦇

20,926 views • 8 months ago

Prince William has seized control of the British Royal Family from a dying King Charles. While I have genuine sympathy for the monarch on a personal level, his weakness over Andrew – not to mention Harry & Meghan – has imperilled the future of the monarchy. His heir knows that.

Prince William has seized control of the British Royal Family from a dying King Charles. While I have genuine sympathy for the monarch on a personal level, his weakness over Andrew – not to mention Harry & Meghan – has imperilled the future of the monarchy. His heir knows that.

Dan Wootton

548,278 views • 8 months ago