Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

RTI misconception: no, your Tier 1 instruction won’t close big gaps from previous years, and that means more than 20% of your class may need intervention. #education #rti #teachesoftiktok #intervention

14,153 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

9 Yorum

Kevin Hustek profil fotoğrafı
Kevin Hustek1 yıl önce

I’m with you on this, but at what point do we say Tier 1 might need to be tightened up when there are large cohorts of Ss advancing that aren’t proficient? And when you drill into the data further it shows they’re not new to the school?

Justin Baeder, PhD profil fotoğrafı
Justin Baeder, PhD1 yıl önce

I think when students come in with what they need, but don’t leave the grade with what they should have gotten. That’s when we can say Tier 1 should be our focus. Teachers are constantly blamed for gaps that opened in previous years.

Tony Cook🏈 profil fotoğrafı
Tony Cook🏈1 yıl önce

This may be the best I’ve ever heard this stated.

Kristin profil fotoğrafı
Kristin1 yıl önce

I think the issue arises when we then have such huge gaps that even a dedicated class period can’t move the needle. In that case, the load the interventionist carries is that of 3 or 4 teachers 😣 (3rd grade teacher here, multiple students at k-1 level)

Phil 👨‍🏫 profil fotoğrafı
Phil 👨‍🏫1 yıl önce

Absolutely on point. I can't teach my students if they don't have the skills required to absorb the grade-level content. This is part of why I'm having them do @sharemath's Fact Freaks site: - get basic facts to automaticity - instill confidence & "I can do this" mentality Learning isn't fun when it's over your head. We talk about independence, instructional, and frustration level texts for reading, but the same applies to math as well -- especially if they can't read the word problems.

Chris Li profil fotoğrafı
Chris Li1 yıl önce

*fistbump* enjoying your content!

One-Room Education profil fotoğrafı
One-Room Education1 yıl önce

One of the most brilliant breakdowns of this issue I've ever heard. Thank you sir.

Jo-Anne Gross profil fotoğrafı
Jo-Anne Gross1 yıl önce

#UFLI spreads this Our training and program is now competing with their propaganda that they are an intervention. It never ends.

Teresa Murray profil fotoğrafı
Teresa Murray1 yıl önce

it depends. Gaps in grade 1 can be made up in many cases, far more easily than in high school.

Benzer Videolar

RTI = RIGHT TO DENY INFORMATION? ▪️The RTI is under attack like never before - if the Modi govt has its way the Right To Information may well become the Right To Deny Information. Because it’s likely that you may no longer get the information you seek from your govt. Read on 👉How is RTI under attack? • Amendment of Section 8(1)(j) of RTI under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act), 2023 makes RTI redundant and ineffective 👉What has Modi done to dilute RTI? • Govt has amended Section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act that pertains to Personal Information. The changed rule says that no personal information can be given under RTI • This is nothing more than broad denial of information under the guise of privacy 👉Why Furore Over DPDP Act Now? • Modi Govt had passed Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act) in 2023 when majority of opposition MPs were suspended • Govt had not notified rules so far and had put the changes for public consultation, the deadline for which ends today • If the govt undermines concerns from every sector quarter and notifies the rules then RTI becomes a toothless right with no good for people 👉Why is RTI important? • The Right to Information Act was revolutionary, it empowered citizens by giving them the right to seek answers & information • RTI also made governance transparent and govts more accountable - just how it should be in any democracy • RTI has time and again exposed massive corruption or lapses in policy execution • RTI has unravelled violation of rules and human rights • RTI made powerless citizens powerful 👉Did RTI really divulge personal information? • Absolutely NOT. In its original form, Section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act 2005 clearly provided for withholding Personal Information which doesn’t pertain to a public activity or public interest or which amounts to invasion of privacy 👉So what kind of information can RTI now possibly deny? • Names and amount of billionaire wilful defaulters? • Wilful defaulters who have fled India? • How much loan has been waived off for the crony capitalists by banks? • How many work days have been given under MGNREGA? • How much grain has been distributed under PDS and to whom? • Whose names have been added or deleted from electoral rolls? • Income and assets of public representatives, bureaucrats and judges? • Beneficiaries of govt schemes? 👉Does Transparency compromise Privacy? • No. In a constitutional democracy like ours transparency and privacy are not mutually exclusive but they mutually coexist to ensure various fundamental rights 👉Citizens or Subjects? • The dilution of the RTI Act, 2005 under the DPDP Act, 2023 is a direct attack on both transparency and accountability which threatens the fundamental right to information. We are citizens of India who have a right to know and not subjects in a kingdom! : Supriya Shrinate ji

Congress

27,606 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce