Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Rupert Lowe has proposed that he and Nigel Farage set aside their personal differences for Reform and Restore to work together before the next general election. Though the terms of an agreement remain vague, Farage said he remains open to a deal. The offer came as Labour broke Reform's... 300+ opinion poll lead, casting doubt on the inevitability of their election victory. An extra 100,000+ members, 3 - 7 per cent of the vote, Rupert Lowe's seat on the Public Accounts Committee, exuberant Zoomer staff, and regaining credibility on demographics and deportations are all significant benefits Reform stands to gain from incorporating Restore. But within a day, discussions descended into bickering over who failed to answer whose texts, with supporters and media surrogates on both sides blaming the other for negotiations breaking down. This is so frustrating, because the leaders of Reform and Restore agree on almost all of Rupert's five principles. Mass deportations for illegal migrants, reversing mass legal migration, cutting the welfare bill, and pursuing energy abundance are already Reform policy. While Reform haven't matched Rupert's rhetoric on restoring demographic security for the white British natives, Farage has released a Substack post expressing concerns about them becoming an imminent minority with no political advocates. As for the death penalty: Richard Tice, Lee Anderson, and likely Zia Yusuf already support it. A referendum on capital punishment would win the party more votes. Even some senior Reform figures regret Tory defections, like Nadhim Zahawi and Nadine Dorries, and would rather they departed the party. Lowe would have to compromise on having Suella Braverman and Robert Jenrick in Reform's cabinet, but perhaps suitable roles could be found for all before Reform Conference. The likelihood of a unified front diminishes the more that partisans and saboteurs throw insults and invent conspiracies. It would be a great shame if they, or interpersonal bitterness, got in the way of this opportunity.show more

Connor Tomlinson

124,142 subscribers

22,267 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Reducing the waffle down what Nigel Farage has said is "I would meet with Rupert Lowe MP but it is the members and voters of Reform UK that are telling me not to" When you extrapolate from the available polling data what Farage is arguing is simply not defensible Most polling shows active support for an agreement. An Daily Express poll, so not Reform UK specific but a close marker, put support for a deal between Farage and Lowe at 82% When looking at voting behaviour, formal polling shows 42% of Reform UK voters would back a Restore Britain candidate - compared to 33% who would back a Tory - if Reform UK had no candidate on the ballot. As per usual the ego of Nigel Farage on full display. He couldn't be honest, self-sacrificing or patriotic if his life depended on it

Reducing the waffle down what Nigel Farage has said is "I would meet with Rupert Lowe MP but it is the members and voters of Reform UK that are telling me not to" When you extrapolate from the available polling data what Farage is arguing is simply not defensible Most polling shows active support for an agreement. An Daily Express poll, so not Reform UK specific but a close marker, put support for a deal between Farage and Lowe at 82% When looking at voting behaviour, formal polling shows 42% of Reform UK voters would back a Restore Britain candidate - compared to 33% who would back a Tory - if Reform UK had no candidate on the ballot. As per usual the ego of Nigel Farage on full display. He couldn't be honest, self-sacrificing or patriotic if his life depended on it

Peter C. Barnes

15,497 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe are battling to stop Andy Burnham from winning the Makerfield by-election. And it's getting ugly. Reform UK are standing plumber, ex-army reservist, and councillor Robert Kenyon against Restore Britain's local businesswoman Rebecca Shepherd. Kenyon is a strong candidate. He came second in the 2024 general election, with 32 percent of the vote. The press are trying to cancel him for crude humour in old social media posts, but Reform have (mostly) stood by their man for once. Whereas Shepherd is an unknown quantity, with little public profile, but far more campaigners knocking on doors in the constituency. Which is why Restore have disputed a Times / Survation poll with a small sample size, which put Reform on 40 percent, three points behind Labour's Andy Burnham, and Restore Britain on 7 percent. Restore's canvassing figures put them on 24.6 percent. Reform's internal polling also has Restore on higher than 7 percent. Hence, why Reform's senior figures, supporters, and media surrogates manned battle stations over the last few days. Their new slogan is "Vote Restore, get Burnham." Hit pieces on Restore were published by GB News, Jewish News, Daily Mail, Spiked, the Telegraph, and the Times within hours of each other. DMs were leaked. Rumours circulated, then retracted. The dirty tricks are disappointing, and offputting to supporters who sympathise with both parties. Some Reform supporters have accused Restore of being simultaneously irrelevant, polling at 1 percent, and of splitting the vote and gifting the election to Andy Burnham; of being racist and providing no distinct policy offering than Reform; of being "useful idiots" and a Trojan Horse for the Tories. But these attacks aren't convincing. The same Conservative MPs, who have since defected to Reform, accused Farage of vote splitting in 2024. Articles criticising Restore as too extreme highlight the differences between the parties on immigration policy. As Dan Hodges suggests, the attempt to sabotage Restore's chances has produced a Streisand Effect, where more Reform voters are aware of Restore than before. Have Reform damaged Kenyon's chances? Or will Restore Britain's support evaporate, and amount to nothing more than pressure placed on Reform?

Connor Tomlinson

30,355 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

With heinous crimes like Henry Nowak's murder and the Southport massacre in the headlines every day now, the British public wants to bring back the death penalty. 47 per cent of students, 58 per cent of Millennials, and 55 per cent of the general public want to bring back the death penalty. That increases to 70 per cent specifically for murder and terrorism. 79 per cent of Reform voters support the death penalty, as do MPs Richard Tice and Lee Anderson. I'm pretty sure Zia Yusuf would volunteer as executioner. But Nigel Farage has yet to commit to a referendum or a parliamentary vote on reinstating it. Restore Britain has promised a "binding referendum" on capital punishment. While a majority of Conservative and Labour voters support it, their parties do not. Millions of voters lack representation on this issue. Unless the next government commits to a vote to bring back the death penalty, the public will continue to feel our national moral ledger remains gravely imbalanced.

With heinous crimes like Henry Nowak's murder and the Southport massacre in the headlines every day now, the British public wants to bring back the death penalty. 47 per cent of students, 58 per cent of Millennials, and 55 per cent of the general public want to bring back the death penalty. That increases to 70 per cent specifically for murder and terrorism. 79 per cent of Reform voters support the death penalty, as do MPs Richard Tice and Lee Anderson. I'm pretty sure Zia Yusuf would volunteer as executioner. But Nigel Farage has yet to commit to a referendum or a parliamentary vote on reinstating it. Restore Britain has promised a "binding referendum" on capital punishment. While a majority of Conservative and Labour voters support it, their parties do not. Millions of voters lack representation on this issue. Unless the next government commits to a vote to bring back the death penalty, the public will continue to feel our national moral ledger remains gravely imbalanced.

Connor Tomlinson

17,278 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Are Reform UK copying Restore Britain? After Rupert Lowe launched Restore Britain as a national political party, Reform UK and their surrogates in the media spent two weeks calling Restore and their supporters neo-Nazis, far right, incels, and ethnonationalists. But now, Zia Yusuf, cosplaying as Shadow Home Secretary, is repeating verbatim Restore's talking points on immigration and Christian heritage. Reform are promising mass deportations — the same policy Nigel Farage called "very grave, dark and dangerous", and expelled Rupert from the party for proposing. Laila Cunningham insists Britain is a secular state, while Zia Yusuf says Christianity is "core to the history and the DNA of the country”, and without it "the country is not a country, it’s just an economic zone." Meanwhile, Nigel Farage still says being English is about "how you feel," and that any other position is "a really worrying, dangerous form of ethno-nationalism". I'm glad Reform are shifting rightwards. But why do Reform attack Restore as "far right" one week, then copy all their policies the next? Why would we elect Muslims to protect our Christian culture? How can we trust Farage to deliver when he's been dragged kicking and screaming to this position, and is still denouncing his own voters?

Are Reform UK copying Restore Britain? After Rupert Lowe launched Restore Britain as a national political party, Reform UK and their surrogates in the media spent two weeks calling Restore and their supporters neo-Nazis, far right, incels, and ethnonationalists. But now, Zia Yusuf, cosplaying as Shadow Home Secretary, is repeating verbatim Restore's talking points on immigration and Christian heritage. Reform are promising mass deportations — the same policy Nigel Farage called "very grave, dark and dangerous", and expelled Rupert from the party for proposing. Laila Cunningham insists Britain is a secular state, while Zia Yusuf says Christianity is "core to the history and the DNA of the country”, and without it "the country is not a country, it’s just an economic zone." Meanwhile, Nigel Farage still says being English is about "how you feel," and that any other position is "a really worrying, dangerous form of ethno-nationalism". I'm glad Reform are shifting rightwards. But why do Reform attack Restore as "far right" one week, then copy all their policies the next? Why would we elect Muslims to protect our Christian culture? How can we trust Farage to deliver when he's been dragged kicking and screaming to this position, and is still denouncing his own voters?

Connor Tomlinson

30,454 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

There is a concerted effort by rival parties and the press to oust Nigel Farage as leader of Reform. It would be a mistake for Restore Britain to join in. Farage faces scrutiny from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards following a Times investigation into his association with “Posh George” Cottrell, and an undeclared £5 million donation from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne. If found to have broken the rules on reporting gifts, he could be suspended as an MP and face a by-election. The likes of Fraser Nelson and Boris Johnson are salivating at the prospect of sabotaging Reform, replacing Farage with a Tory defector or performing political necromancy for the Conservative Party. Persecution might further endear Farage to the public. It suggests the establishment is afraid of him, and could encourage him to continue his recent strengthening of rhetoric on immigration and anti-white racism. But some in Reform are eager to purge the party of nationalist sentiment. There are already traitors talking to the Observer, detailing their efforts to remove “trigger-happy” Zia Yusuf from his role as Home Affairs spokesman. “Zia’s a big problem,” one said, with others arguing “privately that the use of racial politics was necessary to see off Rupert Lowe’s Restore, but the party ultimately needs to appeal to the centre to have any chance of winning.” With the right on the ropes, it is unwise for Rupert Lowe to promise to “throw everything” at a by-election in Clacton. Restore can’t afford another self-inflicted wound, after weeks of Rupert making needless rhetorical blunders about ethnonationalism and multiculturalism, causing infighting among the base. Joining a witch-hunt would reinforce the narrative that Restore is purely motivated by vengeance against Farage — which is not what most of Restore signed up for.

There is a concerted effort by rival parties and the press to oust Nigel Farage as leader of Reform. It would be a mistake for Restore Britain to join in. Farage faces scrutiny from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards following a Times investigation into his association with “Posh George” Cottrell, and an undeclared £5 million donation from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne. If found to have broken the rules on reporting gifts, he could be suspended as an MP and face a by-election. The likes of Fraser Nelson and Boris Johnson are salivating at the prospect of sabotaging Reform, replacing Farage with a Tory defector or performing political necromancy for the Conservative Party. Persecution might further endear Farage to the public. It suggests the establishment is afraid of him, and could encourage him to continue his recent strengthening of rhetoric on immigration and anti-white racism. But some in Reform are eager to purge the party of nationalist sentiment. There are already traitors talking to the Observer, detailing their efforts to remove “trigger-happy” Zia Yusuf from his role as Home Affairs spokesman. “Zia’s a big problem,” one said, with others arguing “privately that the use of racial politics was necessary to see off Rupert Lowe’s Restore, but the party ultimately needs to appeal to the centre to have any chance of winning.” With the right on the ropes, it is unwise for Rupert Lowe to promise to “throw everything” at a by-election in Clacton. Restore can’t afford another self-inflicted wound, after weeks of Rupert making needless rhetorical blunders about ethnonationalism and multiculturalism, causing infighting among the base. Joining a witch-hunt would reinforce the narrative that Restore is purely motivated by vengeance against Farage — which is not what most of Restore signed up for.

Connor Tomlinson

39,638 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

After announcing Reform UK's Shadow Cabinet, Nigel Farage justified banishing and calling the police on Rupert Lowe because they disagreed on mass deportations. "And that was the moment at which, you know, I realised we just had to get rid of him, and get rid of him as quickly as we could," Farage said. "And I think, in terms of the way we dealt with that, we were probably more brutal than the other parties. But you know what? That’s the way it's going to be." Unconscionable. Rupert was talking about deporting the family members of the Pakistani grooming gang perpetrators who know about the crimes and who cover them up, because the victims are white non-Muslim girls. Reform UK think it is worse to deport people who cover up child abuse than it is to call the police on those calling for the deportation of people who cover up child abuse. And Nigel Farage wants to put the man who called the police on Rupert, Zia Yusuf, in charge of the police, counter-terror policy, and immigration. The choice between Reform UK and Restore Britain is clear.

After announcing Reform UK's Shadow Cabinet, Nigel Farage justified banishing and calling the police on Rupert Lowe because they disagreed on mass deportations. "And that was the moment at which, you know, I realised we just had to get rid of him, and get rid of him as quickly as we could," Farage said. "And I think, in terms of the way we dealt with that, we were probably more brutal than the other parties. But you know what? That’s the way it's going to be." Unconscionable. Rupert was talking about deporting the family members of the Pakistani grooming gang perpetrators who know about the crimes and who cover them up, because the victims are white non-Muslim girls. Reform UK think it is worse to deport people who cover up child abuse than it is to call the police on those calling for the deportation of people who cover up child abuse. And Nigel Farage wants to put the man who called the police on Rupert, Zia Yusuf, in charge of the police, counter-terror policy, and immigration. The choice between Reform UK and Restore Britain is clear.

Connor Tomlinson

73,147 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Tim Montgomerie has just been suspended from Reform UK, after weeks of briefings and leaks from within the party against Zia Yusuf. Nigel Farage won the Clacton by-election, but now finds himself the target of a subversive influence operation. Tory-aligned press and sympathisers in Reform are attacking Yusuf and Restore Britain to clear the path for a pact with the Conservatives. A stream of hit pieces against Yusuf, Restore, and yours truly have been published in the Telegraph, Daily Mail, Spectator, Times, and Observer. They are designed to prevent Reform from moving further right — where their voters already are, but alien to Conservatives complicit in breaking our country. Reform must not fall for this obvious containment operation, and should excise anyone encouraging them to reward the Tories for being shepherds of the Boriswave instead. Zia Yusuf must prevail to prevent Reform from becoming a total vessel for containment.

Tim Montgomerie has just been suspended from Reform UK, after weeks of briefings and leaks from within the party against Zia Yusuf. Nigel Farage won the Clacton by-election, but now finds himself the target of a subversive influence operation. Tory-aligned press and sympathisers in Reform are attacking Yusuf and Restore Britain to clear the path for a pact with the Conservatives. A stream of hit pieces against Yusuf, Restore, and yours truly have been published in the Telegraph, Daily Mail, Spectator, Times, and Observer. They are designed to prevent Reform from moving further right — where their voters already are, but alien to Conservatives complicit in breaking our country. Reform must not fall for this obvious containment operation, and should excise anyone encouraging them to reward the Tories for being shepherds of the Boriswave instead. Zia Yusuf must prevail to prevent Reform from becoming a total vessel for containment.

Connor Tomlinson

33,926 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Andy Burnham won the Makerfield by-election with 55 per cent of the vote. But treating Makerfield as a national barometer is a mistake: many voted Labour to get rid of Keir Starmer. Reform underperformed, losing 16 per cent of their vote share from the local elections and another winnable by-election. The party ran a purely negative campaign about blocking Burnham, while their candidate, Robert Kenyon, was crucified by the media for crude jokes on rugby forums. Restore came in third with seven per cent, in line with polling. Some are celebrating, given it's their first by-election. But the party's army of canvassers could have delivered a better result if they had a stronger candidate. Nevertheless, Reform can't blame Restore for "splitting the vote", because both combined got less than Burnham. Instead, Reform needs to start asking why they are topping national polls but losing elections, and Restore must perform better next time if they want to force Reform to the right, or present themselves as a viable alternative. Now that the election is over, it would be a good time for introspection and an end to enmity. Some supporters resorted to ad hominem attacks, dishonesty, and dirty tricks during the campaign. Don't sacrifice your integrity and friendships for political team-sports.

Andy Burnham won the Makerfield by-election with 55 per cent of the vote. But treating Makerfield as a national barometer is a mistake: many voted Labour to get rid of Keir Starmer. Reform underperformed, losing 16 per cent of their vote share from the local elections and another winnable by-election. The party ran a purely negative campaign about blocking Burnham, while their candidate, Robert Kenyon, was crucified by the media for crude jokes on rugby forums. Restore came in third with seven per cent, in line with polling. Some are celebrating, given it's their first by-election. But the party's army of canvassers could have delivered a better result if they had a stronger candidate. Nevertheless, Reform can't blame Restore for "splitting the vote", because both combined got less than Burnham. Instead, Reform needs to start asking why they are topping national polls but losing elections, and Restore must perform better next time if they want to force Reform to the right, or present themselves as a viable alternative. Now that the election is over, it would be a good time for introspection and an end to enmity. Some supporters resorted to ad hominem attacks, dishonesty, and dirty tricks during the campaign. Don't sacrifice your integrity and friendships for political team-sports.

Connor Tomlinson

30,048 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Restore Britain cannot create a division on the right, spend months competing with Reform UK, and then present itself as the solution to the division it caused. Rupert Lowe’s so-called olive branch is not a genuine offer of unity; it demands that Reform compromise its own policies while placing all the blame on Nigel Farage if he refuses. Reform has the MPs, councillors, membership, funding and national structure, while Restore Britain has yet to elect anyone under its own banner. If this is genuinely about defeating Labour rather than protecting one man’s political project, the answer is simple: stop splitting the vote, stand the candidates down and unite behind the party capable of winning.

Restore Britain cannot create a division on the right, spend months competing with Reform UK, and then present itself as the solution to the division it caused. Rupert Lowe’s so-called olive branch is not a genuine offer of unity; it demands that Reform compromise its own policies while placing all the blame on Nigel Farage if he refuses. Reform has the MPs, councillors, membership, funding and national structure, while Restore Britain has yet to elect anyone under its own banner. If this is genuinely about defeating Labour rather than protecting one man’s political project, the answer is simple: stop splitting the vote, stand the candidates down and unite behind the party capable of winning.

Bruce Hamill - Daily Update

37,071 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Since Rupert Lowe launched Restore Britain as a national political party, his former haunt Reform UK’s candidates and media surrogates have been crashing out. Nigel Farage justified Zia Yussuf calling the police on Lowe, saying “we just had to get rid of him…” London Mayor candidate Laila Cunningham called the party “neo-Nazi”. Alex Phillips said Lowe is “the Andrew Tate of politics.” Matt Goodwin told Restore’s supporters they are “very online” and “need to get out more.” Reform have deployed the same smears — racist, sexist, incel, far right — that they accused Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Conservatives, and the Greens of laundering for years to cover up the crimes of mass migration. They have attacked people they’ve known privately and befriended, all while embracing Boris Johnson’s cabinet ministers who are getting Reform policy approved David Cameron’s former Chancellor. Restore Britain will not engage in smear tactics or guilt-by-association. The party will not be made to answer for statements made by anybody but themselves. I encourage all supporters to keep their conduct and rhetoric as gentlemanly as Rupert does — especially when the subversive agents of the state will no doubt be seeking to infiltrate and sabotage Restore Britain as we speak…

Since Rupert Lowe launched Restore Britain as a national political party, his former haunt Reform UK’s candidates and media surrogates have been crashing out. Nigel Farage justified Zia Yussuf calling the police on Lowe, saying “we just had to get rid of him…” London Mayor candidate Laila Cunningham called the party “neo-Nazi”. Alex Phillips said Lowe is “the Andrew Tate of politics.” Matt Goodwin told Restore’s supporters they are “very online” and “need to get out more.” Reform have deployed the same smears — racist, sexist, incel, far right — that they accused Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Conservatives, and the Greens of laundering for years to cover up the crimes of mass migration. They have attacked people they’ve known privately and befriended, all while embracing Boris Johnson’s cabinet ministers who are getting Reform policy approved David Cameron’s former Chancellor. Restore Britain will not engage in smear tactics or guilt-by-association. The party will not be made to answer for statements made by anybody but themselves. I encourage all supporters to keep their conduct and rhetoric as gentlemanly as Rupert does — especially when the subversive agents of the state will no doubt be seeking to infiltrate and sabotage Restore Britain as we speak…

Connor Tomlinson

58,265 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Tommy Robinson, speaking on a podcast while in the U.S., said: "Rupert is our Trump. Rupert Lowe is the only political figure who can save Britain." He went on to claim that Nigel Farage is weak and is already waving the white flag regarding the growing threat of Islamic influence in Britain. It would be interesting to hear what people think about this. Personally, I’m not aligning myself with any one party just yet, but when it comes to voting in the next election, it will certainly be between Restore and Reform UK.

Tommy Robinson, speaking on a podcast while in the U.S., said: "Rupert is our Trump. Rupert Lowe is the only political figure who can save Britain." He went on to claim that Nigel Farage is weak and is already waving the white flag regarding the growing threat of Islamic influence in Britain. It would be interesting to hear what people think about this. Personally, I’m not aligning myself with any one party just yet, but when it comes to voting in the next election, it will certainly be between Restore and Reform UK.

Aɴᴛ

40,259 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Nigel Farage is demanding Andy Burnham call a general election after being installed as Prime Minister. Reform clearly feel confident they could win a Parliamentary majority. But are they prepared to govern the country? Danny Kruger and the Prosperity Institute are drafting plans to restructure the civil service, leave the European Convention on Human Rights, repeal the Human Rights Act, the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act, and the Equality Act, and restore free speech and Parliamentary sovereignty. This is all encouraging. Reform appears to be listening to criticism, producing credible policies, and hiring great talent for the policy team. Even Nigel Farage is writing about how "White Brits will become a minority in this country before the end of the century", and the need to stop it, on Substack. The party appears to be taking things more seriously. There is still room for improvement. Reform must repeal the Race Relations Act — especially the 2000 Amendment, which imposed a statutory duty on police and public bodies to "promote equality of opportunity and good relations between persons of different racial groups". Otherwise, activist judges will use it to obstruct their agenda, after the Equality Act is scrapped. But even if Reform only passed their plans as things stand, life would finally improve for the long-suffering British people.

Nigel Farage is demanding Andy Burnham call a general election after being installed as Prime Minister. Reform clearly feel confident they could win a Parliamentary majority. But are they prepared to govern the country? Danny Kruger and the Prosperity Institute are drafting plans to restructure the civil service, leave the European Convention on Human Rights, repeal the Human Rights Act, the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act, and the Equality Act, and restore free speech and Parliamentary sovereignty. This is all encouraging. Reform appears to be listening to criticism, producing credible policies, and hiring great talent for the policy team. Even Nigel Farage is writing about how "White Brits will become a minority in this country before the end of the century", and the need to stop it, on Substack. The party appears to be taking things more seriously. There is still room for improvement. Reform must repeal the Race Relations Act — especially the 2000 Amendment, which imposed a statutory duty on police and public bodies to "promote equality of opportunity and good relations between persons of different racial groups". Otherwise, activist judges will use it to obstruct their agenda, after the Equality Act is scrapped. But even if Reform only passed their plans as things stand, life would finally improve for the long-suffering British people.

Connor Tomlinson

28,018 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

EXCLUSIVE: Five Conservative MPs have formally opened discussions with Nigel Farage about defecting to Reform UK, including former Home Secretary Suella Braverman. As revealed tonight on Dan Wootton Outspoken, five Conservative MPs contacted Nigel Farage over the weekend to negotiate a potential defection to Reform UK. The most prominent figure among them is former Home Secretary Suella Braverman. While Zia Yusuf and Nigel Farage have publicly stated that the party will not accept any further Tory defections after 7 May, it can also be revealed that Reform UK remains willing to welcome as many Conservative defectors as possible — even if that means extending beyond the previously announced deadline. Suella Braverman has been considering a move to Reform UK for several months. However, the recent defections of Andrew Rosindell and Robert Jenrick have significantly increased her inclination to make the switch.

EXCLUSIVE: Five Conservative MPs have formally opened discussions with Nigel Farage about defecting to Reform UK, including former Home Secretary Suella Braverman. As revealed tonight on Dan Wootton Outspoken, five Conservative MPs contacted Nigel Farage over the weekend to negotiate a potential defection to Reform UK. The most prominent figure among them is former Home Secretary Suella Braverman. While Zia Yusuf and Nigel Farage have publicly stated that the party will not accept any further Tory defections after 7 May, it can also be revealed that Reform UK remains willing to welcome as many Conservative defectors as possible — even if that means extending beyond the previously announced deadline. Suella Braverman has been considering a move to Reform UK for several months. However, the recent defections of Andrew Rosindell and Robert Jenrick have significantly increased her inclination to make the switch.

Charlie Simpson 🇬🇧

187,452 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Ben Habib EXPLODES on Nigel Farage and calls him a LIAR for the way he treated Rupert Lowe 🇬🇧 "Rupert Lowe never said if your forefathers were born in this country that you will be deported. That is a lie from Nigel." Ben is right, Reform are doing all they can to smear Restore Britain, just like everybody else did to Reform!

🚨BREAKING: Ben Habib EXPLODES on Nigel Farage and calls him a LIAR for the way he treated Rupert Lowe 🇬🇧 "Rupert Lowe never said if your forefathers were born in this country that you will be deported. That is a lie from Nigel." Ben is right, Reform are doing all they can to smear Restore Britain, just like everybody else did to Reform!

BRITAIN IS BROKEN 🇬🇧

140,836 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Unbelievable! Rupert Lowe MP spent months trying to destroy Reform UK and Nigel Farage over one disagreement. Now he has come on Beyoncé’s Internet (now that his party is underperforming) to ask Nigel Farage to let go of the disagreement? The only person that was holding onto the disagreement was Rupert 😂 Where was his desperation to “put the country first” when he was slagging off Reform/ Nigel Farage every 5 minutes on X??? Do me a favour The best thing Rupert can do for the “betterment of the country” is shut down his party. I do not think Nigel should not accept this offer because… 1. Reform do not need Restore. Restore need Reform. 2. Loyalty is everything in politics. Rupert did not display any loyalty when he ran to the press to say Nigel “acts like messiah”, started his own party intentionally knocking off votes from reform and slagging off Nigel/ Reform every 5 minutes online.

Unbelievable! Rupert Lowe MP spent months trying to destroy Reform UK and Nigel Farage over one disagreement. Now he has come on Beyoncé’s Internet (now that his party is underperforming) to ask Nigel Farage to let go of the disagreement? The only person that was holding onto the disagreement was Rupert 😂 Where was his desperation to “put the country first” when he was slagging off Reform/ Nigel Farage every 5 minutes on X??? Do me a favour The best thing Rupert can do for the “betterment of the country” is shut down his party. I do not think Nigel should not accept this offer because… 1. Reform do not need Restore. Restore need Reform. 2. Loyalty is everything in politics. Rupert did not display any loyalty when he ran to the press to say Nigel “acts like messiah”, started his own party intentionally knocking off votes from reform and slagging off Nigel/ Reform every 5 minutes online.

BASEDANDBOUGIE

131,855 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat