Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Russell Vought has repeatedly asserted that Donald Trump has the constitutional authority to ignore spending laws enacted by Congress. So I confronted him with a simple question: Is it seriously your position that the Founding Fathers intended to grant to a president like Donald Trump impoundment powers that the...

RitchieTorres's profile picture

Ritchie Torres

218,683 subscribers

208,817 просмотров • 14 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Russell Vought has repeatedly asserted that Donald Trump has the constitutional authority to suspend spending laws enacted by Congress. I asked Mr. Vought whether, under his theory, the President could unilaterally defund the Department of Defense, the Supreme Court, or entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare. He conspicuously refused to answer.
1:09

Russell Vought has repeatedly asserted that Donald Trump has the constitutional authority to suspend spending laws enacted by Congress. I asked Mr. Vought whether, under his theory, the President could unilaterally defund the Department of Defense, the Supreme Court, or entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare. He conspicuously refused to answer.

Ritchie Torres

129,993 просмотров • 12 дней назад

Russell Vought is wrong. 187 years before Project 2025, the Supreme Court emphatically rejected Russell Vought’s theory that a president has the constitutional authority to suspend spending laws enacted by Congress.
0:52

Russell Vought is wrong. 187 years before Project 2025, the Supreme Court emphatically rejected Russell Vought’s theory that a president has the constitutional authority to suspend spending laws enacted by Congress.

Ritchie Torres

66,198 просмотров • 11 дней назад

#Watch | US President Donald Trump has claimed that the people of Iran want to make him their supreme leader, but according to him, he is not interested in taking the position Read more:
0:45

#Watch | US President Donald Trump has claimed that the people of Iran want to make him their supreme leader, but according to him, he is not interested in taking the position Read more:

NDTV

34,888 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional—100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of President Donald J. Trump now, this is the position of every single president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed... We comply with it in terms of like notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress... but even as a senator, I would say that the war powers act is 100% unconstitutional."
1:16

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional—100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of President Donald J. Trump now, this is the position of every single president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed... We comply with it in terms of like notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress... but even as a senator, I would say that the war powers act is 100% unconstitutional."

Rapid Response 47

204,875 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

President Donald Trump has overcome and sacrificed so much for the American people. I stand by my statement that Trump is "the most extraordinary political figure I have ever seen. Bar none!" President Donald J. Trump
1:27

President Donald Trump has overcome and sacrificed so much for the American people. I stand by my statement that Trump is "the most extraordinary political figure I have ever seen. Bar none!" President Donald J. Trump

Larry Elder

19,025 просмотров • 1 год назад

Chuck Schumer: "Congress has the ultimate authority to impose these tariffs. I'm urging - for the sake of American families - pleading with my Republican colleagues, to buck Donald Trump and not allow him to impose these tariffs on the American people."
2:09

Chuck Schumer: "Congress has the ultimate authority to impose these tariffs. I'm urging - for the sake of American families - pleading with my Republican colleagues, to buck Donald Trump and not allow him to impose these tariffs on the American people."

Breaking911

90,802 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

NEWS ALERT: Democrat Richard Blumenthal LIED in his questioning of OMB Director nominee Russ Vought when he claimed the Supreme Court had ruled in 1975 that the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) was constitutional. The Court did no such thing. In fact, the Court SPECIFICALLY wrote in Train v. New York City that “no issues as to the reach or coverage of the Impoundment Act are before us.” Why would Blumenthal lie about this and claim Russ Vought would “defy” a Supreme Court ruling that never happened?? As I have explained elsewhere, Train was confined to a specific statutory scheme at issue and did not address the President’s constitutional impoundment power—the constitutional issue was not even presented in that case. Russ Vought did a superb job in his testimony, including not backing down in his view that the President has the constitutional power to impound and that the ICA is unconstitutional. Blumenthal is flat out lying to claim that Russ’s view is in defiance of Train’s holding. The Supreme Court has NEVER ruled on the constitutionality of the ICA nor on the President’s constitutional power to impound funds. And we have 170 years of Presidents regularly using his impoundment authority to rein in wasteful or constitutionally problematic spending. Appropriations is a legislative act, the power of the purse. The spending power is an executive power and is vested in the President. Would it be constitutional for Congress to mandate that the President spend $100M to investigate and prosecute certain disfavored individuals? Of course it would not be constitutional and the President has the authority to refuse to spend those funds. Likewise, if Congress appropriated $100M to provide aid to a known terror state or international organization, the President has the constitutional authority (in fact duty) to refuse to do send those funds to this terror entity. There are limits to Congress’ authority to require the President to spend funds. The Impoundment Control Act is a terrible law. It turns history on its head by requiring a President to spend every dollar of an appropriation, even if the project can be done for less. It makes an appropriation a floor rather than a ceiling. The ICA is designed to shovel money out the door regardless of whether it’s necessary to a program, and it’s wildly irresponsible for our fiscal health.
0:22

NEWS ALERT: Democrat Richard Blumenthal LIED in his questioning of OMB Director nominee Russ Vought when he claimed the Supreme Court had ruled in 1975 that the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) was constitutional. The Court did no such thing. In fact, the Court SPECIFICALLY wrote in Train v. New York City that “no issues as to the reach or coverage of the Impoundment Act are before us.” Why would Blumenthal lie about this and claim Russ Vought would “defy” a Supreme Court ruling that never happened?? As I have explained elsewhere, Train was confined to a specific statutory scheme at issue and did not address the President’s constitutional impoundment power—the constitutional issue was not even presented in that case. Russ Vought did a superb job in his testimony, including not backing down in his view that the President has the constitutional power to impound and that the ICA is unconstitutional. Blumenthal is flat out lying to claim that Russ’s view is in defiance of Train’s holding. The Supreme Court has NEVER ruled on the constitutionality of the ICA nor on the President’s constitutional power to impound funds. And we have 170 years of Presidents regularly using his impoundment authority to rein in wasteful or constitutionally problematic spending. Appropriations is a legislative act, the power of the purse. The spending power is an executive power and is vested in the President. Would it be constitutional for Congress to mandate that the President spend $100M to investigate and prosecute certain disfavored individuals? Of course it would not be constitutional and the President has the authority to refuse to spend those funds. Likewise, if Congress appropriated $100M to provide aid to a known terror state or international organization, the President has the constitutional authority (in fact duty) to refuse to do send those funds to this terror entity. There are limits to Congress’ authority to require the President to spend funds. The Impoundment Control Act is a terrible law. It turns history on its head by requiring a President to spend every dollar of an appropriation, even if the project can be done for less. It makes an appropriation a floor rather than a ceiling. The ICA is designed to shovel money out the door regardless of whether it’s necessary to a program, and it’s wildly irresponsible for our fiscal health.

Mark Paoletta

217,757 просмотров • 1 год назад

Morning after Independence Day, George Stephanopoulos opened This Week with a screed against President Trump: "The Declaration of Independence, signed 250 years ago this week, broke America free of rule by a British monarch. The constitution that followed was designed to ensure that our country would not be governed by a monarch. The President would be constrained by the courts, in Congress, ethical norms and elections every four years. 250 years later, that system is under stress, tested by a President determined to wield power and buck norms in a way his predecessors did not..."
1:35

Morning after Independence Day, George Stephanopoulos opened This Week with a screed against President Trump: "The Declaration of Independence, signed 250 years ago this week, broke America free of rule by a British monarch. The constitution that followed was designed to ensure that our country would not be governed by a monarch. The President would be constrained by the courts, in Congress, ethical norms and elections every four years. 250 years later, that system is under stress, tested by a President determined to wield power and buck norms in a way his predecessors did not..."

Brent Baker 🇺🇲🇺🇦 🇮🇱

16,023 просмотров • 26 дней назад

MS NOW asked a number of my Republican colleagues a very simple question: Has President Trump done anything this term that you disagree with? Apparently, their answer is NO. Not the corruption. Not the lawlessness. Not the attacks on our institutions. Not the wasteful government spending. Not one single thing. I have never agreed with every decision made by a Democratic President. Nor should I. That is normal. That is democracy. What is not normal is an entire party refusing to admit that its leader has ever been wrong. Congress is supposed to hold Presidents accountable. My Republican colleagues seem more interested in proving their loyalty to Donald Trump.
2:02

MS NOW asked a number of my Republican colleagues a very simple question: Has President Trump done anything this term that you disagree with? Apparently, their answer is NO. Not the corruption. Not the lawlessness. Not the attacks on our institutions. Not the wasteful government spending. Not one single thing. I have never agreed with every decision made by a Democratic President. Nor should I. That is normal. That is democracy. What is not normal is an entire party refusing to admit that its leader has ever been wrong. Congress is supposed to hold Presidents accountable. My Republican colleagues seem more interested in proving their loyalty to Donald Trump.

Rep. Mike Levin

25,057 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Trump advisor: Congress does not have a constitutional role in the declaration of war. Klein: I will quote the Constitution. ‘The Congress shall have power to declare war.’ Trump advisor: *silence* Klein: It is Congress that has the power to declare war. Trump advisor: S-so… The issue has to do with what was meant by ‘declare’…
1:10

Trump advisor: Congress does not have a constitutional role in the declaration of war. Klein: I will quote the Constitution. ‘The Congress shall have power to declare war.’ Trump advisor: *silence* Klein: It is Congress that has the power to declare war. Trump advisor: S-so… The issue has to do with what was meant by ‘declare’…

Headquarters

1,035,520 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Torres: It demonstrates that Donald Trump is not pro-crypto, he’s not pro-blockchain—he’s not even pro-Web3. I doubt he could define any of those terms. He is simply pro-Trump. The only ideology Donald Trump has is himself. His presidency exists to enrich him and his family, and crypto is just a means to that end—the end being the enrichment of Donald Trump.
0:52

Torres: It demonstrates that Donald Trump is not pro-crypto, he’s not pro-blockchain—he’s not even pro-Web3. I doubt he could define any of those terms. He is simply pro-Trump. The only ideology Donald Trump has is himself. His presidency exists to enrich him and his family, and crypto is just a means to that end—the end being the enrichment of Donald Trump.

Acyn

58,212 просмотров • 1 год назад

⛔️China humiliated Trump ⛔️‼️ ⛔️Donald Trump has arrived in China to find that President XI did NOT greet him at the airport‼️
0:50

⛔️China humiliated Trump ⛔️‼️ ⛔️Donald Trump has arrived in China to find that President XI did NOT greet him at the airport‼️

Dr.Sam Youssef Ph.D.,Ph.D.,DPT.

11,980 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith EXPLODES on NAACP for snubbing TRUMP from convention after inviting every president for last *116 years*🚨 "You don't get to ignore him! ... He has been the most powerful, the most influential member of the GOP since 2015." "How does you refusing to invite him, ostracizing him, not wanting to hear what he has to say to you all — how does that help you!? How!?" "Ignoring him and not even inviting him to come and speak at your convention — what's that gonna accomplish?" "Are you trying to tell me that there's no president that has been as offensive to the NAACP as Donald Trump in 116 years?" "Are you really making that argument? That no matter what you think about Donald Trump, that's the only person, that's the only president of the United States that you've been able to say that about in a 116-year history of the NAACP!?" "116 years!" "Doing the math, that goes back to 1909!" "Since 1909, there's no president that has ever been more offensive to the NAACP than Donald Trump?" "I don't think this is the right move." "If all of us had to like the people we had to deal with and do business with, how would business ever get done in this country — if not this world?" Daily Caller
3:13

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith EXPLODES on NAACP for snubbing TRUMP from convention after inviting every president for last *116 years*🚨 "You don't get to ignore him! ... He has been the most powerful, the most influential member of the GOP since 2015." "How does you refusing to invite him, ostracizing him, not wanting to hear what he has to say to you all — how does that help you!? How!?" "Ignoring him and not even inviting him to come and speak at your convention — what's that gonna accomplish?" "Are you trying to tell me that there's no president that has been as offensive to the NAACP as Donald Trump in 116 years?" "Are you really making that argument? That no matter what you think about Donald Trump, that's the only person, that's the only president of the United States that you've been able to say that about in a 116-year history of the NAACP!?" "116 years!" "Doing the math, that goes back to 1909!" "Since 1909, there's no president that has ever been more offensive to the NAACP than Donald Trump?" "I don't think this is the right move." "If all of us had to like the people we had to deal with and do business with, how would business ever get done in this country — if not this world?" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

1,576,303 просмотров • 1 год назад

.President Donald J. Trump has always understood that the American People are the foundation of our nation's strength and prosperity, and thanks to him, the world once again knows that the American Worker is our greatest competitive advantage.
0:43

.President Donald J. Trump has always understood that the American People are the foundation of our nation's strength and prosperity, and thanks to him, the world once again knows that the American Worker is our greatest competitive advantage.

Acting Secretary Keith Sonderling

51,005 просмотров • 15 дней назад

"The President is threatening the Insurrection Act..." Secretary Kristi Noem: "I spoke to President Donald J. Trump this morning about several different things, but we did discuss that. That certainly is within the President’s constitutional authority to use that if he thinks he needs to to keep people safe."
0:45

"The President is threatening the Insurrection Act..." Secretary Kristi Noem: "I spoke to President Donald J. Trump this morning about several different things, but we did discuss that. That certainly is within the President’s constitutional authority to use that if he thinks he needs to to keep people safe."

Rapid Response 47

79,248 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"Why did Donald Trump repeatedly make these false statements, the evidence will show that he did so to cover up crimes relating to the 2016 Election." Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg speaks about the case he has brought against former President Donald Trump.
1:45

"Why did Donald Trump repeatedly make these false statements, the evidence will show that he did so to cover up crimes relating to the 2016 Election." Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg speaks about the case he has brought against former President Donald Trump.

NEWSMAX

347,469 просмотров • 3 лет назад

If there's any sermon that should go viral it would be Reverend Kevin Johnson’s of Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem. “I don't doubt that Nicolas Maduro is a thug, but so is Trump. I don't doubt that Maduro is a criminal, but so is Trump. I don't doubt that Maduro rigged the elections, but so did Trump. I don't doubt that Maduro has tried to silence his critics, but so has Trump. I don't doubt he has tried to enrich himself, but so has Trump. I don't doubt he has weaponized the justice system, but so has Donald Trump. I don't doubt that Maduro has lied to his people, but I want you to know that each and every day he looks in the camera and he lies to us- so has Donald Trump.” #DemsUnited
0:58

If there's any sermon that should go viral it would be Reverend Kevin Johnson’s of Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem. “I don't doubt that Nicolas Maduro is a thug, but so is Trump. I don't doubt that Maduro is a criminal, but so is Trump. I don't doubt that Maduro rigged the elections, but so did Trump. I don't doubt that Maduro has tried to silence his critics, but so has Trump. I don't doubt he has tried to enrich himself, but so has Trump. I don't doubt he has weaponized the justice system, but so has Donald Trump. I don't doubt that Maduro has lied to his people, but I want you to know that each and every day he looks in the camera and he lies to us- so has Donald Trump.” #DemsUnited

LanaQuest aka RosaSparks

118,880 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Dr Umar believes that Cyril Ramaphosa did a disservice to the South African people in how he handled the sitdown with Donald Trump a few weeks ago. I agree with him.
1:53

Dr Umar believes that Cyril Ramaphosa did a disservice to the South African people in how he handled the sitdown with Donald Trump a few weeks ago. I agree with him.

Penuel The Black Pen

74,853 просмотров • 1 год назад

Cain: Does Hasan piker reflect your vision? El-Sayed: I do think it is kind of crazy when you have the likes of Donald Trump on this show, who says he wants to grab people by certain body parts, Donald Trump who wants to weaponize a paramilitary force, do you agree with everything Donald Trump has said? Cain: The idea that because I interview President Donald Trump is the same as you campaigning with Hasan Piker is absurd. Let me ask you would you invite president Donald Trump on the stage with you? El-Sayed: I would love to debate him on stage. Cain: You’re playing a slick word game.
2:18

Cain: Does Hasan piker reflect your vision? El-Sayed: I do think it is kind of crazy when you have the likes of Donald Trump on this show, who says he wants to grab people by certain body parts, Donald Trump who wants to weaponize a paramilitary force, do you agree with everything Donald Trump has said? Cain: The idea that because I interview President Donald Trump is the same as you campaigning with Hasan Piker is absurd. Let me ask you would you invite president Donald Trump on the stage with you? El-Sayed: I would love to debate him on stage. Cain: You’re playing a slick word game.

Acyn

76,444 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад