正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Russian T-64’s of various models (A,B,BV) that have been pulled from storage, the 2000 T-64’s in Russian stock in 2014 were supposed to have been scrapped, I don’t believe that ever happened due to the amount of T-64’s I’ve seen come from Russia, or if it did it was...

338,309 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Buschlaid 的头像
Buschlaid2 年前

A lot of Russian T-64s ended up being used as targets on firing ranges. And of course large amount was given to separatists from 2014 on. I’m kinda surprised there are still that many left as I expected the stocks would be mostly depleted of T-64s.

KwisatzHaderach 的头像
KwisatzHaderach2 年前

It takes people to operate them The quality of the operates might as well make these into large land mines Slava Ukraini

RY🔻(Still Useless Leopard 2 arc)🔻AN 的头像
RY🔻(Still Useless Leopard 2 arc)🔻AN2 年前

maybe for cannibalization as well Russia has no use for T-64s because they have limited infrastructure for them

Shukuru+ 的头像
Shukuru+2 年前

Could it be now that they have replaced with modern tanks they are happy deploy those.

Александр Мартьянов 的头像
Александр Мартьянов2 年前

About 30 tanks on this single train. I'm pretty sure @CovertCabal would notice, if there was 2000 t-64s in ruzzian storages.

poe 的头像
poe2 年前

I guess the “scrapped” can be renamed to “under new management”. I won’t be surprised if they found ways to rename their weapons removal tasks in forms of concealed arms transfers.

Arms Show Tracker 的头像
Arms Show Tracker2 年前

There are T-64's left? 😆

⛧ Xenosapien ꑭ 的头像
⛧ Xenosapien ꑭ2 年前

Forward to the Oryx list

yomismovaya! 的头像
yomismovaya!2 年前

is that recent? no snow at all.

相关视频

Strange Tests – Firing at a T-64B Tank from "Hyacinth" Almost Point-Blank.Comendante wondered, "Will the Ukrainian T-64 tank withstand a point-blank shot from the 152mm Hyacinth?" It's worth clarifying here that the hull design, including the VLD on the T-64 (T-64B = 30+80+105+20), is similar to that of the T-72.1st shot – tank displacement from the impact impulse, destruction of part of the plate welded to the VLD, damage from barrel fragments and destruction of the weld seam of the support (the lower 20mm part of the VLD), destruction of the turret ring. 2nd shot – shot at the joint between the turret and hull over the driver's hatch – breach of the hull roof.Further shooting 4 more times at the turret, glacis, and gun. What can be said here? – For a design developed in 1961 without requirements to withstand hits from a 152mm OFS from "Hyacinth," it's actually not bad.The breach of the front part of the hull roof upon explosion of an OF projectile is well-known, see - problem with the stability of the MV hatch on the T-64(A) when hit over the MV hatch is also known - raises another question – why haven't these issues been improved in 65 years? On the "newest" T-90M, it's the same hatch as on the 64. Cracks and detachments of parts also occur the topic of researching the damaging effect of high-explosive fragmentation shells on armor, see -The effectiveness of a 152mm high-explosive fragmentation shell against armor significantly depends on its velocity and angle of impact. At velocities over 800 m/s, the impulse force of the shells can reach 40-50 kN·s, which is 2-2.5 times greater than that of a 125mm high-explosive fragmentation shell; when the velocity decreases from 400 to 250 m/s, it decreases by 2 to 4 times... The impulse force when a 152mm shell hits a tank (at 800 m/s velocity) is 1.4-2 times greater compared to the impulse of a 125mm HE. INVESTIGATION OF THE DAMAGING EFFECT OF HIGH-EXPLOSIVE FRAGMENTATION SHELLS ON ARMOR (

Andrei_bt

26,662 次观看 • 6 个月前