正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

rust in garry's mod LOL i remember seeing this 2 years ago, looks a bit more refined now and reminds me of old rust imagine 32 rust youtubers on one server 👀

72,754 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Ahm2d 的头像
Ahm2d2 年前

Looks more fun than the actual game

Spicy 的头像
Spicy2 年前

Yeah this is just a better version of rust tbh

jack 的头像
jack2 年前

Probably more fun than what we have now

Ohmwrecker 的头像
Ohmwrecker2 年前

Holy shit, that's super well done! But... why Gmod though!? 😂

vein 的头像
vein2 年前

please be old recoil and old gun sound

solutize 的头像
solutize2 年前

This looks nostalgic af

eNeruFPS 的头像
eNeruFPS2 年前

They need to make standalone 2016 rust possible

kingwarchief 的头像
kingwarchief2 年前

is it protect by EASY antiCHEAT for cheaters happy life? or there is no cheater without EASY antiCHEAT

Tylaoooooo 的头像
Tylaoooooo2 年前

IM BOUTTA PLAY THIS SHIT

相关视频

Why is Rust different than many/most programming languages? Alice Ryhl works on Google's Android Rust team, is a Rust language team advisor, and is a core maintainer of Tokio (the most widely-used async runtime in Rust) Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 04:09 Tokio: an overview 05:11 What Alice likes about Rust 12:48 Rust for TypeScript engineers 13:51 Moving from C++ to Rust 14:34 Memory safety 18:12 Garbage collection tradeoffs 21:46 Ownership, references, and borrowing 26:59 Unsafe in Rust 31:21 Crates and Cargo 35:55 Language design and RFCs 43:02 Building new features 46:30 Editions vs. versions 49:47 Getting paid to work on Rust 51:27 Contributing to Rust 53:03 Rust in the Linux kernel 55:45 AI use cases for Rust 1:01:35 Learning Rust 1:03:54 Book recommendation Brought to you by: • Antithesis – verify your system’s correctness without human review or traditional integration tests – and avoid bugs or outages. • Sentry – application monitoring software considered “not bad” by millions of developers Three things worth knowing about Rust: 1. Rust was designed to turn implicit failures into compile errors. Where other languages allow you to forget something, Rust makes an omission into a compilation error for things like null checks, uninitialized variables, or error propagation with the ‘?’ character. If you mess something up, it’s almost certain your program will not compile. If it does, at the very least you should see a lint warning. 2. Refactoring in Rust is safe and easy, thanks to the compiler. Alice: “I change a return type or struct field, then just fix the compiler errors until the compiler stops shouting. And then once I’ve done that, I’ve updated every place I need to update.” Rust’s focus on correctness makes refactoring it more straightforward than dynamically-typed languages and Java-style typed ones are to refactor. 3. “Editions” allow Rust to make breaking changes without ‘breaking’ anyone’s code. Rust editions (2015, 2018, 2021, 2024) can be mixed freely across crates. A library on the 2021 edition works seamlessly with a binary on the 2024 edition. This is how Rust evolves syntax (like adding async/await as keywords) without forcing an ecosystem-wide migration. Thanks a lot, Alice for this great discussion! And for your work on Rust.

Gergely Orosz

51,961 次观看 • 3 个月前