Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Ruto and Raila will face a big problem containing this generation😂 #RejectFinanceBill2025 #FreeRoseNjeri #MadarakaDay2025 Luos Homabay Nyanza Notam Kazi Inafanyika Wantam Social Health Authority Gladys Wanga Azimio Njoroge Nation Kenya Happy New Month Uhuru

Karen Mwakio

1,875 subscribers

39,073 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics Comedy #RejectFinanceBill2025 #FreeRoseNjeri #MadarakaDay2025

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

FANCO2 years ago

NEW OFFICIAL COLLABORATION ALERT! Get your PERSONALIZED @MHAOfficial Japanese hanko stamps at for yourself, friends and family! #fanco #mha #MyHeroAcademia

Eot1 year ago

It's a win term..mtangoja!

Karen Mwakio1 year ago

This finance bill 2025 will send Ruto home

Tik_Tokka_Clox™1 year ago

Very true but the target is not the increase of commodity prices that's up to manufacturers who are already overcharging us anyway - trust me I know. The target is Tax Returns another hole to steal from Kenyans, by doing this they plug that hole and hence more revenue bila > tax+

David1 year ago

you mean containing Murima?

tinga1 year ago

Work harder stop crying like a bitch

Patrick1 year ago

#RejectFinanceBill2025

Kabirú wa Wanjogu1 year ago

#RejectFinanceBill2025 #FreeRoseNjeri Streets are calling us....

Related Videos

The PS Ministry of Interior | Kenya Raymond Omolo has caused more harm than good to this nation. Omollo is the reason other people fear giving luos powerful miniseries because it depicts luos as a dangerous people with power. It's true Oburu and Gladys Wanga once told Ruto omollo is the source of insecurity in luo Nyanza. His days are numbered. This we promise.

The PS Ministry of Interior | Kenya Raymond Omolo has caused more harm than good to this nation. Omollo is the reason other people fear giving luos powerful miniseries because it depicts luos as a dangerous people with power. It's true Oburu and Gladys Wanga once told Ruto omollo is the source of insecurity in luo Nyanza. His days are numbered. This we promise.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

15,640 views • 4 months ago

Happy New Year from Melbourne CBD everyone 🥂🍾 It doesn’t look like a Western nation at all right? Yet, this is the reality of Melbourne CBD on New Year’s Eve. This is an issue. Because no matter how individually they might all be good people, collectively, as a nation, it is a problem, one that erodes cultural identity and social cohesion. MULTICULTURALISM IS A FAILED CONCEPT When you start seeing demographic change and clusters of groups that are supposed to be a “minority” forming - and all in a sudden we are the minority - it is a problem, and a big one. All we need to do is to look at Europe. What’s happening in the UK, Germany, France, Italy.. it’s terrifying. And we must oppose it with all we’ve got. One Nation is the only party that has been at the forefront of this issue since day one and that will keep putting Australians first - unapologetically. One Nation Australia One Nation Victoria Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

Happy New Year from Melbourne CBD everyone 🥂🍾 It doesn’t look like a Western nation at all right? Yet, this is the reality of Melbourne CBD on New Year’s Eve. This is an issue. Because no matter how individually they might all be good people, collectively, as a nation, it is a problem, one that erodes cultural identity and social cohesion. MULTICULTURALISM IS A FAILED CONCEPT When you start seeing demographic change and clusters of groups that are supposed to be a “minority” forming - and all in a sudden we are the minority - it is a problem, and a big one. All we need to do is to look at Europe. What’s happening in the UK, Germany, France, Italy.. it’s terrifying. And we must oppose it with all we’ve got. One Nation is the only party that has been at the forefront of this issue since day one and that will keep putting Australians first - unapologetically. One Nation Australia One Nation Victoria Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

Bianca Colecchia | PH One Nation

11,686 views • 8 months ago

Gladys Wanga, with all due respect, you do not qualify to advise President Uhuru Kenyatta a man who led this country with dignity, order, and respect for the rule of law. We know you and your type very well political orphans, desperately clinging to relevance as 2027 approaches. You stand on shaky ground, not because the people have changed, but because you chose the path of betrayal, hypocrisy, and blind loyalty to power instead of truth. This nation is exhausted. Kenyans are tired of William Ruto tired of the lies, the arrogance, the corruption, and the pain that his regime has inflicted on ordinary citizens. No propaganda can erase hunger. No speech can silence poverty. No sermon can wash away injustice. What this country needs is not noise, not intimidation, but a listening President a leader who feels the pain of the people, not one who dines with oligarchs while citizens sleep hungry. You said our democracy is fragile? No, Governor our democracy is strong because it belongs to the people, not to the state. You and others in power are the ones weakening it through fear, manipulation, and betrayal. That is the same strategy you used to weaken Raila Odinga convincing him to chase positions and handshakes instead of listening to the cries of his people. You isolated him from his base and turned his mission into a personal ambition. That’s not politics that’s sabotage. Uhuru Kenyatta, unlike most of you, is a believer in constitutionalism, democracy, and truth. He knows Ruto better than anyone Ruto was his deputy for 10 long years. He warned us, and we ignored him. Today, as a nation drowning in economic misery and insecurity, we realize he was right. And now we seek his forgiveness because we failed to listen when he tried to save this country from a man driven by greed and vengeance. Gladys Wanga, let me remind you of Chris Msando. Do you remember how he died? Do you remember who was blamed, and how Raila Odinga was told the truth but chose silence for the sake of peace? Raila entered a so-called Broad-Based Government knowing very well the blood of his loyal soldiers cried for justice and yet he bowed to the same system that destroyed them. So don’t lecture us about Uhuru Kenyatta. Don’t tell us he’s the only former president alive when you and your circle are the very reason Raila Odinga’s political soul was killed. His dream of liberating this nation was suffocated by greed, bad advice, and selfish interests. You can defend Ruto all you want but understand this clearly: the people are watching, and in 2027, they will speak loudly. Power returns to the people, and when that time comes, no position, no connection, and no state protection will save anyone who betrayed their trust. The days of political puppetry are ending. Kenya is rising and truth will have the final word.

Gladys Wanga, with all due respect, you do not qualify to advise President Uhuru Kenyatta a man who led this country with dignity, order, and respect for the rule of law. We know you and your type very well political orphans, desperately clinging to relevance as 2027 approaches. You stand on shaky ground, not because the people have changed, but because you chose the path of betrayal, hypocrisy, and blind loyalty to power instead of truth. This nation is exhausted. Kenyans are tired of William Ruto tired of the lies, the arrogance, the corruption, and the pain that his regime has inflicted on ordinary citizens. No propaganda can erase hunger. No speech can silence poverty. No sermon can wash away injustice. What this country needs is not noise, not intimidation, but a listening President a leader who feels the pain of the people, not one who dines with oligarchs while citizens sleep hungry. You said our democracy is fragile? No, Governor our democracy is strong because it belongs to the people, not to the state. You and others in power are the ones weakening it through fear, manipulation, and betrayal. That is the same strategy you used to weaken Raila Odinga convincing him to chase positions and handshakes instead of listening to the cries of his people. You isolated him from his base and turned his mission into a personal ambition. That’s not politics that’s sabotage. Uhuru Kenyatta, unlike most of you, is a believer in constitutionalism, democracy, and truth. He knows Ruto better than anyone Ruto was his deputy for 10 long years. He warned us, and we ignored him. Today, as a nation drowning in economic misery and insecurity, we realize he was right. And now we seek his forgiveness because we failed to listen when he tried to save this country from a man driven by greed and vengeance. Gladys Wanga, let me remind you of Chris Msando. Do you remember how he died? Do you remember who was blamed, and how Raila Odinga was told the truth but chose silence for the sake of peace? Raila entered a so-called Broad-Based Government knowing very well the blood of his loyal soldiers cried for justice and yet he bowed to the same system that destroyed them. So don’t lecture us about Uhuru Kenyatta. Don’t tell us he’s the only former president alive when you and your circle are the very reason Raila Odinga’s political soul was killed. His dream of liberating this nation was suffocated by greed, bad advice, and selfish interests. You can defend Ruto all you want but understand this clearly: the people are watching, and in 2027, they will speak loudly. Power returns to the people, and when that time comes, no position, no connection, and no state protection will save anyone who betrayed their trust. The days of political puppetry are ending. Kenya is rising and truth will have the final word.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

139,699 views • 10 months ago

Mr. President, your statement is not visionary it’s insulting. It’s a mockery to the millions of Kenyans who believed your “hustler” gospel. You once stood before the nation declaring war against dynasties, promising to liberate hustlers from the claws of political royalty. Yet today, with no shame, you proudly announce that you’ve “engaged” Uhuru Kenyatta, Raila Odinga, and Gideon Moi the same people you told us were the problem. The same dynasties who have ruled, ruined, and recycled this nation into poverty, debt, and despair. You are now walking hand in hand with the very lords of suffering you once called oppressors. The mask has fallen, Mr. Ruto. The hustler myth is dead. You didn’t want to end dynasties you wanted to join them. You didn’t want to fight for the poor you wanted to rise high enough to dine with their masters. But let this be known: Kenyans have awakened. The same people who chanted your name in dusty stadiums, who sacrificed their last coin believing in the “bottom-up” dream, are now the same people shouting #RutoMustGo across the streets, villages, and online spaces. The same people who buried their sons and daughters in the 2024–2025 Gen Z protests are now ready to bury your politics not in silence, but in defiance. You talk of moving Kenya from a third-world to a first-world country, yet under your leadership, children are dying of hunger while you host billion-shilling tea parties with the dynasties. Farmers are crying, fuel prices have skyrocketed, the youth are jobless, corruption is back in full swing, and Parliament has turned into a marketplace for political puppets. The only thing moving fast in this country is debt and your convoy. You speak of “brotherhood” with Uhuru, Raila, and Gideon but we, the people, know what this “brotherhood” means. It means backroom deals, tribal bargaining, and looting under the guise of unity. It means the hustlers are once again left outside the gate while their so-called leaders toast champagne inside. Uhuru Kenyatta handed us debt. Raila Odinga handed us confusion. Gideon Moi handed us silence. And now, William Ruto has handed us betrayal. The four of you products of privilege, power, and manipulation are not a symbol of progress. You are the living embodiment of what’s wrong with this nation: greed, deception, and dynastic recycling. But this time, Kenyans are not waiting for elections to express their anger. They are in the streets, online, in universities, in markets organizing, mobilizing, and awakening. They have seen through your slogans, your theatrics, and your fake humility. They have realized that tribe means nothing when all tribes are hungry. They have learned that political parties mean nothing when every politician is a liar in a new suit. The revolution you mocked is alive silent, simmering, and unstoppable. It’s not being led by Raila, Uhuru, or Ruto it’s being led by ordinary Kenyans, the youth who no longer believe in political gods. The ones who were tear-gassed and beaten, but refused to give up. The ones who know that Kenya will only rise when we end the rule of dynasties and imposters who pretend to be hustlers. So, Mr. President, you can gather all the dynastic sons you want Uhuru, Raila, Gideon and hold your meetings. But the streets have already decided: You will all go home together. The Kenya of 2025 is not begging for mercy it’s demanding accountability. The people will no longer be spectators in a political game between the children of the rich. We are taking our country back with our voices, our votes, and our defiance. And when history is written, it will say: Ruto united the dynasties but the people united to end them all.

Mr. President, your statement is not visionary it’s insulting. It’s a mockery to the millions of Kenyans who believed your “hustler” gospel. You once stood before the nation declaring war against dynasties, promising to liberate hustlers from the claws of political royalty. Yet today, with no shame, you proudly announce that you’ve “engaged” Uhuru Kenyatta, Raila Odinga, and Gideon Moi the same people you told us were the problem. The same dynasties who have ruled, ruined, and recycled this nation into poverty, debt, and despair. You are now walking hand in hand with the very lords of suffering you once called oppressors. The mask has fallen, Mr. Ruto. The hustler myth is dead. You didn’t want to end dynasties you wanted to join them. You didn’t want to fight for the poor you wanted to rise high enough to dine with their masters. But let this be known: Kenyans have awakened. The same people who chanted your name in dusty stadiums, who sacrificed their last coin believing in the “bottom-up” dream, are now the same people shouting #RutoMustGo across the streets, villages, and online spaces. The same people who buried their sons and daughters in the 2024–2025 Gen Z protests are now ready to bury your politics not in silence, but in defiance. You talk of moving Kenya from a third-world to a first-world country, yet under your leadership, children are dying of hunger while you host billion-shilling tea parties with the dynasties. Farmers are crying, fuel prices have skyrocketed, the youth are jobless, corruption is back in full swing, and Parliament has turned into a marketplace for political puppets. The only thing moving fast in this country is debt and your convoy. You speak of “brotherhood” with Uhuru, Raila, and Gideon but we, the people, know what this “brotherhood” means. It means backroom deals, tribal bargaining, and looting under the guise of unity. It means the hustlers are once again left outside the gate while their so-called leaders toast champagne inside. Uhuru Kenyatta handed us debt. Raila Odinga handed us confusion. Gideon Moi handed us silence. And now, William Ruto has handed us betrayal. The four of you products of privilege, power, and manipulation are not a symbol of progress. You are the living embodiment of what’s wrong with this nation: greed, deception, and dynastic recycling. But this time, Kenyans are not waiting for elections to express their anger. They are in the streets, online, in universities, in markets organizing, mobilizing, and awakening. They have seen through your slogans, your theatrics, and your fake humility. They have realized that tribe means nothing when all tribes are hungry. They have learned that political parties mean nothing when every politician is a liar in a new suit. The revolution you mocked is alive silent, simmering, and unstoppable. It’s not being led by Raila, Uhuru, or Ruto it’s being led by ordinary Kenyans, the youth who no longer believe in political gods. The ones who were tear-gassed and beaten, but refused to give up. The ones who know that Kenya will only rise when we end the rule of dynasties and imposters who pretend to be hustlers. So, Mr. President, you can gather all the dynastic sons you want Uhuru, Raila, Gideon and hold your meetings. But the streets have already decided: You will all go home together. The Kenya of 2025 is not begging for mercy it’s demanding accountability. The people will no longer be spectators in a political game between the children of the rich. We are taking our country back with our voices, our votes, and our defiance. And when history is written, it will say: Ruto united the dynasties but the people united to end them all.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

34,955 views • 10 months ago

President William Ruto is no longer governing Kenya. He is protecting himself. When lies collapse, a clever conman does not apologise he divides. He has done it before. He is doing it again. In 2007, he weaponised Kalenjin pain against Kikuyu neighbours. Today, as president, he is engineering suspicion Luo, Luhya, Kalenjin vs Kikuyu not because tribes hate each other, but because a cornered man needs enemies to survive. Look closely: Luhyas are refusing. They say: we won’t be used. Kisiis are resisting. They say: our struggles are shared. Ordinary Kenyans are tired. They say: our problem is poverty, not tribes. So what does Ruto do? He reaches for the oldest, dirtiest tool in Kenyan politics: outsourcing tribal venom. He doesn’t shout it himself. He uses compromised Luo elites, desperate men with positions but no dignity, to spit poison on his behalf to provoke Kikuyu anger, to trigger fear, to recreate siege politics. Not because Kikuyus are the problem. Not because Luos are the problem. But because unity terrifies him. Three years in office. Nothing to show. What remains of the promises? Bottom–up? A slogan, not a system. Hustlers? Crushed by taxes, levies, licences, and police harassment. Cost of living? Worse than ever. Free healthcare? A lie buried in unpaid SHA bills. Wi-Fi in markets? A joke. Uplifting small traders? They’re closing shops. Pampers for newborns? Insulting theatrics while maternity wards collapse. Every promise was cheap marketing. Every rally was a sales pitch. Every speech was a con. Now that the lies are exposed, he has switched scripts. Yesterday it was Hustler Nation. Today it is Singapore. Same trick. New costume. Singapore had discipline, integrity, institutions, and consequences. Ruto offers none of that only debt, propaganda, and repression. You cannot build Singapore on: corruption without shame taxes without services debt without production tribal division without trust You don’t leapfrog from chaos to miracle by talking harder. This is the danger. A president who has failed economically will always try to survive ethnically. A leader who cannot deliver prosperity will manufacture fear. A man with nothing to show will always point fingers. Kenya is not broken because of Kikuyu. Kenya is not suffering because of Luo, Luhya, Kalenjin, or Kisii. Kenya is bleeding because it is being ruled by a man who mistakes manipulation for leadership and propaganda for vision. This is not about tribes. This is about truth vs deception. Competence vs conmanship. Unity vs manufactured hatred. History is watching. And it never spares leaders who rule by lies and division. No amount of slogans will save this project.

President William Ruto is no longer governing Kenya. He is protecting himself. When lies collapse, a clever conman does not apologise he divides. He has done it before. He is doing it again. In 2007, he weaponised Kalenjin pain against Kikuyu neighbours. Today, as president, he is engineering suspicion Luo, Luhya, Kalenjin vs Kikuyu not because tribes hate each other, but because a cornered man needs enemies to survive. Look closely: Luhyas are refusing. They say: we won’t be used. Kisiis are resisting. They say: our struggles are shared. Ordinary Kenyans are tired. They say: our problem is poverty, not tribes. So what does Ruto do? He reaches for the oldest, dirtiest tool in Kenyan politics: outsourcing tribal venom. He doesn’t shout it himself. He uses compromised Luo elites, desperate men with positions but no dignity, to spit poison on his behalf to provoke Kikuyu anger, to trigger fear, to recreate siege politics. Not because Kikuyus are the problem. Not because Luos are the problem. But because unity terrifies him. Three years in office. Nothing to show. What remains of the promises? Bottom–up? A slogan, not a system. Hustlers? Crushed by taxes, levies, licences, and police harassment. Cost of living? Worse than ever. Free healthcare? A lie buried in unpaid SHA bills. Wi-Fi in markets? A joke. Uplifting small traders? They’re closing shops. Pampers for newborns? Insulting theatrics while maternity wards collapse. Every promise was cheap marketing. Every rally was a sales pitch. Every speech was a con. Now that the lies are exposed, he has switched scripts. Yesterday it was Hustler Nation. Today it is Singapore. Same trick. New costume. Singapore had discipline, integrity, institutions, and consequences. Ruto offers none of that only debt, propaganda, and repression. You cannot build Singapore on: corruption without shame taxes without services debt without production tribal division without trust You don’t leapfrog from chaos to miracle by talking harder. This is the danger. A president who has failed economically will always try to survive ethnically. A leader who cannot deliver prosperity will manufacture fear. A man with nothing to show will always point fingers. Kenya is not broken because of Kikuyu. Kenya is not suffering because of Luo, Luhya, Kalenjin, or Kisii. Kenya is bleeding because it is being ruled by a man who mistakes manipulation for leadership and propaganda for vision. This is not about tribes. This is about truth vs deception. Competence vs conmanship. Unity vs manufactured hatred. History is watching. And it never spares leaders who rule by lies and division. No amount of slogans will save this project.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

71,014 views • 8 months ago

In all the 75 years that Jaramogi Oginga Odinga (1950 to 1994), James Orengo (1994 to 1997) and Raila Odinga (1997 to 2025) were recognised as the undisputed leaders of the Luo community, and regardless of the age-old differences between the Luo and the Kikuyu, none of them ever stood on a public podium and said anything this shocking. Oburu says in this clip that "Kalenjins are our types and our relatives, but we will never have anything with Kikuyus because they will never change and we have tried many times, but those ones are not ours". Oburu also says that Luo elders totally opposed "Kibaki Tosha" in 2002, without explaining how then Raila successfully ran it into a winning machine. Of course he won't mention that meeting at Ofafa Memorial Hall, when Raila met and explained to Luo elders, as their SG, Prof Gilbert Ogutu, took notes, that removing the destructive Kanu regime was a bigger national responsibility than Luo-Kikuyu rivalry. The last real Luo-Kikuyu act was that of Jomo Kenyatta's own son trying to make Jaramogi's son president in 2022. No matter how much peddlers of tribal hate seek to twist this event, history will always record that Uhuru Kenyatta, against every prevailing philosophy, backed Raila Odinga for President in 2022. FACT. Just like Raila believed in 2002 that the perennial divide between the Luo and the Kikuyu was hurting the country's social fabric and its wider inter-ethnic relations, Uhuru acknowledged in 2022 that giving power to the Jaramogi household would probably be the most revolutionary action in the country's independent history. On that score, both Raila and Uhuru should have promptly qualified for the Nobel Peace Prize, because their acts of courage, against the wishes of their own ethnic bases, gave us a glimpse of leadership that seeks truth and justice away from the comfort of tribal warmth. Dr Oburu Oginga is a leader unto doom, destruction and stagnation. After the 75 years of his father and brother working to heal a divided nation, the fact that he can don the colours of Raila's party, mount a podium and resurrect tribal divisions to push his agenda means he is the biggest mistake the party has ever made. Dr Oburu obviously hasn't looked closed at the crowds he addresses. His age mates are not there! These are kids born after that Kibaki Tosha moment. Many don't even speak vernacular. Many are born or dwell in mixed-tribe households or neighbourhoods where tribe is becoming a non-issue. To preach to them medieval philosophies of tribal hate is to take a retirement joke way too far. In private, we probably say nasty things about other communities. People of my generation even write them on our pages. What we don't expect is that our leaders will go to the podium and preach these things openly. I have a theory... The Luo and the Kikuyu are not neighbours, and have never fought, either over politics or land, as compared to "others". My feeling is that this rising anti-Kikuyu sentiment being peddled by broad-based ODM is being done on behalf of "others" ahead of 2027. And this is where Oburu and intellectual saucepans like Atandi will find themselves in trouble if the hatred they now peddle turns into an ICC-level conflict in 2027, a conflict not involving Luos but started with loose talk cleverly egged on by non-Luo government networks. Raila's death has exposed the worst things he used to conceal.

In all the 75 years that Jaramogi Oginga Odinga (1950 to 1994), James Orengo (1994 to 1997) and Raila Odinga (1997 to 2025) were recognised as the undisputed leaders of the Luo community, and regardless of the age-old differences between the Luo and the Kikuyu, none of them ever stood on a public podium and said anything this shocking. Oburu says in this clip that "Kalenjins are our types and our relatives, but we will never have anything with Kikuyus because they will never change and we have tried many times, but those ones are not ours". Oburu also says that Luo elders totally opposed "Kibaki Tosha" in 2002, without explaining how then Raila successfully ran it into a winning machine. Of course he won't mention that meeting at Ofafa Memorial Hall, when Raila met and explained to Luo elders, as their SG, Prof Gilbert Ogutu, took notes, that removing the destructive Kanu regime was a bigger national responsibility than Luo-Kikuyu rivalry. The last real Luo-Kikuyu act was that of Jomo Kenyatta's own son trying to make Jaramogi's son president in 2022. No matter how much peddlers of tribal hate seek to twist this event, history will always record that Uhuru Kenyatta, against every prevailing philosophy, backed Raila Odinga for President in 2022. FACT. Just like Raila believed in 2002 that the perennial divide between the Luo and the Kikuyu was hurting the country's social fabric and its wider inter-ethnic relations, Uhuru acknowledged in 2022 that giving power to the Jaramogi household would probably be the most revolutionary action in the country's independent history. On that score, both Raila and Uhuru should have promptly qualified for the Nobel Peace Prize, because their acts of courage, against the wishes of their own ethnic bases, gave us a glimpse of leadership that seeks truth and justice away from the comfort of tribal warmth. Dr Oburu Oginga is a leader unto doom, destruction and stagnation. After the 75 years of his father and brother working to heal a divided nation, the fact that he can don the colours of Raila's party, mount a podium and resurrect tribal divisions to push his agenda means he is the biggest mistake the party has ever made. Dr Oburu obviously hasn't looked closed at the crowds he addresses. His age mates are not there! These are kids born after that Kibaki Tosha moment. Many don't even speak vernacular. Many are born or dwell in mixed-tribe households or neighbourhoods where tribe is becoming a non-issue. To preach to them medieval philosophies of tribal hate is to take a retirement joke way too far. In private, we probably say nasty things about other communities. People of my generation even write them on our pages. What we don't expect is that our leaders will go to the podium and preach these things openly. I have a theory... The Luo and the Kikuyu are not neighbours, and have never fought, either over politics or land, as compared to "others". My feeling is that this rising anti-Kikuyu sentiment being peddled by broad-based ODM is being done on behalf of "others" ahead of 2027. And this is where Oburu and intellectual saucepans like Atandi will find themselves in trouble if the hatred they now peddle turns into an ICC-level conflict in 2027, a conflict not involving Luos but started with loose talk cleverly egged on by non-Luo government networks. Raila's death has exposed the worst things he used to conceal.

Kipkalya Kones

19,418 views • 3 months ago

🚨⚠️📢FOUND: SHOCKING VIDEO INTERVIEW ABOUT WILLIAM RUTO‼️Why is nobody talking about this⁉️Why are people not bringing this up⁉️This is such a damning "origin story"‼️For sure, William Ruto must not be on the 2027 ballot‼️Transcript below: Gachoka: Now, moving away from that. I also then want to say, as he retired, he left Rift Valley, without a leader to take his position. Over the years, there has been several attempts to take over the mantle. The late Nicolas Biwott. For example, your friend Senator Gideon Moi and now the DP, William Ruto. Let's now maybe agree that Ruto is the kingpin in the Rift Valley. How would you contrast the two? Jirongo: Yes. William Ruto could be the kingpin in Rift Valley today, but I think, it is a misplaced choice in my, blunt view. That, if I had to look at Gideon Moi, and look at William Ruto, they are far apart. Maybe William has learned to socialize, but he doesn't socialize genuinely. And, it is taking Gideon time to actually socialize. But the two are miles apart, one is a human being and another one is something else. Gachoka: Let's then, first of all, look at this man, William Ruto. Cyrus, people who are younger may not know of YK92 or your role when President Moi was fighting for political life, is that you are mobilizing the youth of Kenya and so forth, and you then got together with Ruto. Could you give us a synopsis of YK92 and how you met Ruto? Jirongo: YK92 was a lobby group, just eh young men coming together who were able and, they went flat out to try and mobilize the country for retired President Moi. Gachoka: What period was this Cyrus? Jirongo: This was 91. And, ending up in 92 and up to 93. The earlier parts of 93 after elections. And the purpose was that at one time there was serious agitation of multipartyism in the Republic. And, the agitation had gone on for quite some time. Repeal of section 2A so that multipartyism could be accepted in the Republic of Kenya. And it was not easy, particularly for the people. There were so many things going on, it was difficult from the Moi [era]. And we, we came in to try to, to, to to work with him. Gachoka: And let me then say, at that time, of 91 and so on. You were the chairman of YK92, what role was William Ruto in YK92? Because I'm trying to find out how your relationship began. Jirongo: William Ruto was never part of, Youth for KANU 92. William, William Ruto was one of the young men who spent their time at KICC, at the youth and the women's office with Doctor Julia Ojiambo. I actually came to know William Ruto, properly, after elections in 1993. We worked closely with Julia Ojiambo. And that is how, I ended up knowing Ruto. And specifically when he came in to try and get some orders to supply t-shirts and all those sorts of things. Gachoka: I see. So, in terms of the joining KANU as a party and becoming an operative, you were very close to President Moi. Obviously Ruto began his political life then, how did he enter into the Moi orbit? And, what do you remember... Jirongo: The truth be said, William Ruto. Then after the 1992, campaign where we lobbied, for votes for Moi, he then looked for friendship with me through Fred Amayo, and they pushed very hard. I was a bit hesitant, but, because of something that had happened and, I talked to Amayo, I told Fred Amayo, this young man, you brought him into my office and asked me to give him a contract to supply 10,000 T-shirts. You remember, he did not supply the 10,000. Instead, he brought a thousand T-shirts and repeatedly, delivered the same, t-shirts ten times. So we ended up paying, or I ended up paying him 1.2 million shillings because a t-shirt then was about, 120 shillings for the delivery of only a thousand shillings [t-shirts]. What he did was he tried and corrupted the young boys who were in the stores, and, he would deliver a thousand t-shirts. They give it back to him, he delivers again, and they give it back for him, ten times. And so I paid him, 1.2 million instead of, paying him for a thousand t-shirts, which would have been 120,000. And that is the reason why I resisted when Fred Amayo tried to push him, to become closer so that we work together after, disbanding YK92. Gachoka: Right. So the Kenyans can understand his journey after that. How did he then jump in to be an assistant minister in the Moi government? Jirongo: That is far much, much later we worked together then, Amayo succeeded Fred Amayo, and we worked together with William in the same office until 1997. And, some of the things I feared, when Amayo, was trying to push him closer, came to pass, including you agree with somebody, there is this work you need to do, He comes back and gives you the wrong quote. You give him money. The same money is discovered in his car in the evening. Those kind of things. Gachoka: You know Cyrus I bring this issue because, the deputy president, was quoted and, in, in a, in the function saying that the problem with you, you never, move from the past, ulikuwa mkubwa wake ama mdosi. Sasa wewe huwezi kukubali amekuwa mdosi. Jirongo: You see, Gachoka: I want Kenyans to understand that history. Jirongo: When you try to get to whatever position using whatever means, including fraud, deception, and which is a hallmark of a lot of politicians in this country. Unfortunately, I was not made like that. I do my things fairly, in a very straight way, I do not, take advantage of people. He does take advantage of people. He worked with President Moi, President Moi made him a deputy minister, and, he moved on. I introduced him to President Moi. After that, he got rid of Moi, Moi meant nothing. He became Raila’s friend. After that, Raila meant nothing. He stepped on Raila very roughly, tried to penetrate the Kibaki regime, finally ending up, through struggle because I know actually Uhuru resisted working with, with Ruto for quite a while through friends. Paul Ndungu tried to get him closer, Uhuru refused. It is, Wanjigi who finally managed to push Ruto through to Uhuru. But I think Uhuru also read that there is a bit of trouble here, because history could tell him that this is a man, if he has no respect for Jirongo. He has no respect for Moi. He has no respect, for Raila. And these are people who he has worked with in politics, and tried, these people have played a role in his political life. Who am I Uhuru Kenyatta, that this man is going to work with me and he respect me, and we will work together for the good of this country. Gachoka: So Jirongo, because this is Point Blank, Jirongo: Yes. Gachoka: Are you telling Kenyans, who are watching you today that Ruto and Uhuru are, it's not, it's not, it's not it's not working? Jirongo: They are not cut from the same leaf as I might say. They are totally two different people. You have somebody who is, deceptive and you have somebody who is genuine and straight. It's very difficult for the two of you to work together competently and efficiently. Gachoka: I have to ask you this because, from where you sit, there's confusing headlines every day. There's tanga tanga, kieleweke names that are all there out there in the media. But many times when the deputy president is speaking, he says nimetumwa na mdoss, he has sent me here with 5 million or a million, then tomorrow the headline they have fallen apart, they are not, you know Jirongo this country's in 2020, and I just would like you to tell Kenyans. Is it broken with Kenyatta and Ruto? Jirongo: I'm not seeing it working and I saw it not working from the word go. It can never work, because as I've told you, you are dealing with totally two different individuals. Gachoka: And then if that is the case, I wanted to say this, is it Kenyatta who betrayed Ruto? because at least where the news headlines are, is that Kenyatta na Ruto walikuwa pamoja na Kenyatta anadanganya Ruto, anampokonya, he is not keeping his word. Why do you think this has broken down? Jirongo: History can bear out, honorable Uhuru Kenyatta on this, one, William Ruto fell out with the retired president Moi, he fell out with Raila. He fell out with me. And, it is usual for him after he has used you and the thinks, you have no value anymore, the first time maybe, their first five years, Uhuru was useful. But for now, Uhuru is irrelevant as far as William is concerned, he wants to get to the next. And whoever he can use, that's why he's always in Central Province places. As a deputy president, if I'm going to my president’s turf, surely I need his blessings and tell him I'm going to your turf, What message do you give me? What I can tell you without, flinching an eye, most of those incursions Ruto has been making in, Central Province. There they stem from realizing, as far as he is concerned, that Uhuru is of no value to me anymore. Let me go. Let me see who I can groom, and, the people I’ll work with, to achieve my ends. And, of course, you expect Uhuru to be frustrated, other than the other issues that have, played out very loudly, including corruption. Gachoka: Well, Cyrus Jirongo says, retired President Daniel Arap Moi and the upcoming William Samoei arap Ruto are different people cut from different cloths. Jirongo contends that Ruto dumped him or used him, and he did the same to retired Prime Minister Raila Odinga. Is there more than meets the eye to William Ruto? You're watching KTN news. #RutoMustGo #RutoMustGoNow #GhostRuto #GhostRuto2026 #WANTAM

🚨⚠️📢FOUND: SHOCKING VIDEO INTERVIEW ABOUT WILLIAM RUTO‼️Why is nobody talking about this⁉️Why are people not bringing this up⁉️This is such a damning "origin story"‼️For sure, William Ruto must not be on the 2027 ballot‼️Transcript below: Gachoka: Now, moving away from that. I also then want to say, as he retired, he left Rift Valley, without a leader to take his position. Over the years, there has been several attempts to take over the mantle. The late Nicolas Biwott. For example, your friend Senator Gideon Moi and now the DP, William Ruto. Let's now maybe agree that Ruto is the kingpin in the Rift Valley. How would you contrast the two? Jirongo: Yes. William Ruto could be the kingpin in Rift Valley today, but I think, it is a misplaced choice in my, blunt view. That, if I had to look at Gideon Moi, and look at William Ruto, they are far apart. Maybe William has learned to socialize, but he doesn't socialize genuinely. And, it is taking Gideon time to actually socialize. But the two are miles apart, one is a human being and another one is something else. Gachoka: Let's then, first of all, look at this man, William Ruto. Cyrus, people who are younger may not know of YK92 or your role when President Moi was fighting for political life, is that you are mobilizing the youth of Kenya and so forth, and you then got together with Ruto. Could you give us a synopsis of YK92 and how you met Ruto? Jirongo: YK92 was a lobby group, just eh young men coming together who were able and, they went flat out to try and mobilize the country for retired President Moi. Gachoka: What period was this Cyrus? Jirongo: This was 91. And, ending up in 92 and up to 93. The earlier parts of 93 after elections. And the purpose was that at one time there was serious agitation of multipartyism in the Republic. And, the agitation had gone on for quite some time. Repeal of section 2A so that multipartyism could be accepted in the Republic of Kenya. And it was not easy, particularly for the people. There were so many things going on, it was difficult from the Moi [era]. And we, we came in to try to, to, to to work with him. Gachoka: And let me then say, at that time, of 91 and so on. You were the chairman of YK92, what role was William Ruto in YK92? Because I'm trying to find out how your relationship began. Jirongo: William Ruto was never part of, Youth for KANU 92. William, William Ruto was one of the young men who spent their time at KICC, at the youth and the women's office with Doctor Julia Ojiambo. I actually came to know William Ruto, properly, after elections in 1993. We worked closely with Julia Ojiambo. And that is how, I ended up knowing Ruto. And specifically when he came in to try and get some orders to supply t-shirts and all those sorts of things. Gachoka: I see. So, in terms of the joining KANU as a party and becoming an operative, you were very close to President Moi. Obviously Ruto began his political life then, how did he enter into the Moi orbit? And, what do you remember... Jirongo: The truth be said, William Ruto. Then after the 1992, campaign where we lobbied, for votes for Moi, he then looked for friendship with me through Fred Amayo, and they pushed very hard. I was a bit hesitant, but, because of something that had happened and, I talked to Amayo, I told Fred Amayo, this young man, you brought him into my office and asked me to give him a contract to supply 10,000 T-shirts. You remember, he did not supply the 10,000. Instead, he brought a thousand T-shirts and repeatedly, delivered the same, t-shirts ten times. So we ended up paying, or I ended up paying him 1.2 million shillings because a t-shirt then was about, 120 shillings for the delivery of only a thousand shillings [t-shirts]. What he did was he tried and corrupted the young boys who were in the stores, and, he would deliver a thousand t-shirts. They give it back to him, he delivers again, and they give it back for him, ten times. And so I paid him, 1.2 million instead of, paying him for a thousand t-shirts, which would have been 120,000. And that is the reason why I resisted when Fred Amayo tried to push him, to become closer so that we work together after, disbanding YK92. Gachoka: Right. So the Kenyans can understand his journey after that. How did he then jump in to be an assistant minister in the Moi government? Jirongo: That is far much, much later we worked together then, Amayo succeeded Fred Amayo, and we worked together with William in the same office until 1997. And, some of the things I feared, when Amayo, was trying to push him closer, came to pass, including you agree with somebody, there is this work you need to do, He comes back and gives you the wrong quote. You give him money. The same money is discovered in his car in the evening. Those kind of things. Gachoka: You know Cyrus I bring this issue because, the deputy president, was quoted and, in, in a, in the function saying that the problem with you, you never, move from the past, ulikuwa mkubwa wake ama mdosi. Sasa wewe huwezi kukubali amekuwa mdosi. Jirongo: You see, Gachoka: I want Kenyans to understand that history. Jirongo: When you try to get to whatever position using whatever means, including fraud, deception, and which is a hallmark of a lot of politicians in this country. Unfortunately, I was not made like that. I do my things fairly, in a very straight way, I do not, take advantage of people. He does take advantage of people. He worked with President Moi, President Moi made him a deputy minister, and, he moved on. I introduced him to President Moi. After that, he got rid of Moi, Moi meant nothing. He became Raila’s friend. After that, Raila meant nothing. He stepped on Raila very roughly, tried to penetrate the Kibaki regime, finally ending up, through struggle because I know actually Uhuru resisted working with, with Ruto for quite a while through friends. Paul Ndungu tried to get him closer, Uhuru refused. It is, Wanjigi who finally managed to push Ruto through to Uhuru. But I think Uhuru also read that there is a bit of trouble here, because history could tell him that this is a man, if he has no respect for Jirongo. He has no respect for Moi. He has no respect, for Raila. And these are people who he has worked with in politics, and tried, these people have played a role in his political life. Who am I Uhuru Kenyatta, that this man is going to work with me and he respect me, and we will work together for the good of this country. Gachoka: So Jirongo, because this is Point Blank, Jirongo: Yes. Gachoka: Are you telling Kenyans, who are watching you today that Ruto and Uhuru are, it's not, it's not, it's not it's not working? Jirongo: They are not cut from the same leaf as I might say. They are totally two different people. You have somebody who is, deceptive and you have somebody who is genuine and straight. It's very difficult for the two of you to work together competently and efficiently. Gachoka: I have to ask you this because, from where you sit, there's confusing headlines every day. There's tanga tanga, kieleweke names that are all there out there in the media. But many times when the deputy president is speaking, he says nimetumwa na mdoss, he has sent me here with 5 million or a million, then tomorrow the headline they have fallen apart, they are not, you know Jirongo this country's in 2020, and I just would like you to tell Kenyans. Is it broken with Kenyatta and Ruto? Jirongo: I'm not seeing it working and I saw it not working from the word go. It can never work, because as I've told you, you are dealing with totally two different individuals. Gachoka: And then if that is the case, I wanted to say this, is it Kenyatta who betrayed Ruto? because at least where the news headlines are, is that Kenyatta na Ruto walikuwa pamoja na Kenyatta anadanganya Ruto, anampokonya, he is not keeping his word. Why do you think this has broken down? Jirongo: History can bear out, honorable Uhuru Kenyatta on this, one, William Ruto fell out with the retired president Moi, he fell out with Raila. He fell out with me. And, it is usual for him after he has used you and the thinks, you have no value anymore, the first time maybe, their first five years, Uhuru was useful. But for now, Uhuru is irrelevant as far as William is concerned, he wants to get to the next. And whoever he can use, that's why he's always in Central Province places. As a deputy president, if I'm going to my president’s turf, surely I need his blessings and tell him I'm going to your turf, What message do you give me? What I can tell you without, flinching an eye, most of those incursions Ruto has been making in, Central Province. There they stem from realizing, as far as he is concerned, that Uhuru is of no value to me anymore. Let me go. Let me see who I can groom, and, the people I’ll work with, to achieve my ends. And, of course, you expect Uhuru to be frustrated, other than the other issues that have, played out very loudly, including corruption. Gachoka: Well, Cyrus Jirongo says, retired President Daniel Arap Moi and the upcoming William Samoei arap Ruto are different people cut from different cloths. Jirongo contends that Ruto dumped him or used him, and he did the same to retired Prime Minister Raila Odinga. Is there more than meets the eye to William Ruto? You're watching KTN news. #RutoMustGo #RutoMustGoNow #GhostRuto #GhostRuto2026 #WANTAM

Gen Z Initiative

19,013 views • 5 months ago

Obituary: Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) - From National Hope to Tribal Briefcase The Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), once a towering symbol of Kenya’s aspirations for reform and unity, has expired, withered into a hollow husk by Raila Odinga’s unyielding ambition and serial handshakes. Born on October 11, 2005, in the heat of the constitutional referendum, ODM was 20 years old at its demise, reduced from a national movement to a tribal relic, and finally to a mere briefcase outfit, stripped of principle and purpose. ODM burst onto the scene as a vibrant force for change, rallying a diverse coalition to champion devolution and equity. Under Raila Odinga’s leadership, it nearly won the presidency in 2007, exposing electoral flaws and helping birth the 2010 Constitution. Its early years saw it unite supporters from Nyanza to the Rift Valley with promises of anti-corruption reforms and a break from elite dominance. By 2013 and 2017, ODM’s coalitions, like Azimio la Umoja in 2022, kept it a national contender, its orange banners synonymous with the fight for the marginalized. But its decline began in 2008, when Raila’s first handshake with Mwai Kibaki traded revolutionary zeal for a power-sharing deal, dulling ODM’s fire. The 2018 handshake with Uhuru Kenyatta and the 2024 pact with William Ruto, struck amid Gen Z protests, entrenched a pattern of pragmatic betrayal. Each deal shrank ODM’s national character, narrowing its base to a tribal stronghold rooted in Luo loyalty. By 2025, the party had become a “briefcase outfit” - a hollow vessel for Raila’s personal ambitions, with whispers of an African Union chairmanship as his exit from a fifth failed presidential bid in 2027. This slide from national movement to tribal fiefdom, and finally to a one-man show, saw ODM lose talent and trust. The postponed 20th anniversary celebration in Mombasa, cloaked as a nod to “inclusivity,” masked internal chaos. Analysts long predicted ODM’s fade into irrelevance as Kenya’s youth-driven politics rejected tribal barons, leaving the party a relic outpaced by a new era. ODM is survived by faint echoes of constitutional reforms, a disillusioned cadre of activists, and rivals like UDA, now feeding on its remains. It is predeceased by the dreams of a united Kenya and the faith of millions who once saw orange as the color of change. No ceremonies will mark its passing. Good riddance to bad rubbish - may Kenya’s future be free from the shackles of such diminished visions.

Obituary: Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) - From National Hope to Tribal Briefcase The Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), once a towering symbol of Kenya’s aspirations for reform and unity, has expired, withered into a hollow husk by Raila Odinga’s unyielding ambition and serial handshakes. Born on October 11, 2005, in the heat of the constitutional referendum, ODM was 20 years old at its demise, reduced from a national movement to a tribal relic, and finally to a mere briefcase outfit, stripped of principle and purpose. ODM burst onto the scene as a vibrant force for change, rallying a diverse coalition to champion devolution and equity. Under Raila Odinga’s leadership, it nearly won the presidency in 2007, exposing electoral flaws and helping birth the 2010 Constitution. Its early years saw it unite supporters from Nyanza to the Rift Valley with promises of anti-corruption reforms and a break from elite dominance. By 2013 and 2017, ODM’s coalitions, like Azimio la Umoja in 2022, kept it a national contender, its orange banners synonymous with the fight for the marginalized. But its decline began in 2008, when Raila’s first handshake with Mwai Kibaki traded revolutionary zeal for a power-sharing deal, dulling ODM’s fire. The 2018 handshake with Uhuru Kenyatta and the 2024 pact with William Ruto, struck amid Gen Z protests, entrenched a pattern of pragmatic betrayal. Each deal shrank ODM’s national character, narrowing its base to a tribal stronghold rooted in Luo loyalty. By 2025, the party had become a “briefcase outfit” - a hollow vessel for Raila’s personal ambitions, with whispers of an African Union chairmanship as his exit from a fifth failed presidential bid in 2027. This slide from national movement to tribal fiefdom, and finally to a one-man show, saw ODM lose talent and trust. The postponed 20th anniversary celebration in Mombasa, cloaked as a nod to “inclusivity,” masked internal chaos. Analysts long predicted ODM’s fade into irrelevance as Kenya’s youth-driven politics rejected tribal barons, leaving the party a relic outpaced by a new era. ODM is survived by faint echoes of constitutional reforms, a disillusioned cadre of activists, and rivals like UDA, now feeding on its remains. It is predeceased by the dreams of a united Kenya and the faith of millions who once saw orange as the color of change. No ceremonies will mark its passing. Good riddance to bad rubbish - may Kenya’s future be free from the shackles of such diminished visions.

Francis Gaitho

37,449 views • 11 months ago

🤔Is Oscar Sudi, William Ruto’s “Political Engineer”, the Real Deputy President? To understand Oscar Sudi, is to understand his “creator” William Ruto. While Kipchumba Murkomen is preoccupied with watching pornography and scoring own-goals, and Kithure Kindiki keeps squeaking his farcical attempts at trying to appear of any consequence in the Mt. Kenya region, Oscar Sudi is busy, very busy getting shit done for Wiliam Ruto. Oscar Sudi is a powerful, loyal and effective William Ruto creation. Goon: historically and in traditional slang, it means a hired thug, a heavy-handed enforcer for a criminal boss, or a clumsy, foolish person. Oscar Sudi at different times presents as having all the attributes of a “goon”. We’ve been trying to understand this man, Oscar Sudi. Why is he such a prominent feature of the Ruto Regime? What are his skills, how does he think and what does he contribute to the people of Kapseret whom he is supposed to represent in Parliament. The August 1st, 2024, Obinna Show interview gives tremendous insight into this man Oscar Sudi. It is a very tedious watch and so we have tried to put together excerpts which capture the fascinating thinking of one of William Ruto’s most telling creations. Based on the interview and other sources of data, we have so far come to the following conclusions. Oscar Sudi is: - a political “goon” in the realest sense of the word - very cash rich - privy to many of Ruto’s darkest crimes - probably one of the top three figures in William Ruto’s “hustler organization” - resourceful in a criminal brutish way - very shrewd when it comes to instinctive execution - not formally educated - not well mannered - an ardent believer in, William Ruto in a very cultish way - without moral constraints - tribalistic but he does not believe that he is a tribalist - very insecure - very ambitious -very dangerous We already wrote about the illicit/criminal cash collection and cash deployment role Sudi “allegedly” plays in the Ruto Regime, so we shall not dwell on that. You can read about it in the “Would you Buy Lunch for Oscar Sudi?” Article. What we will touch on now are some other aspects of the Sudi phenomenon. It would seem that Oscar Sudi came from a very deprived background. But, he has proved himself to William Ruto, by being very industrious, and willing to do a lot of Ruto’s dirty business, including but not limited to serving as the CS for Matusi. For this, William Ruto has rewarded him with a lot of ill-gotten riches and power. The two are now mutually entwined and mutually obligated. We have very little doubt in our minds that Sudi is a murderer. He kind of has the mentality of a 'child soldier'. (Watch "Beasts of No Nation" on Netflix to get an insight into the world of child soldiers.) Sudi’s only compass seems to be directed by William Ruto, whom he idolizes. During the pretty shocking interview on the Obina Show, Oscar Sudi expressed his deep admiration for William Ruto. He also lashed out when asked what he’d do to anyone who would steal from Kapseret CDF resources. Throughout the interview, hints of a simmering viciousness were evident, but this particular issue triggered him. Our reading of the moment is as follows. In Oscar Sudi’s mind, anything William Ruto orders is okay. Anything William Ruto does not order is fair game. And whereas we are almost certain he has been involved in graft, in Sudi’s mind, graft is only bad when someone outside William Ruto’s approved list does it. We strongly suspect that Oscar Sudi was very involved on the ground during the genocidal Post Election Violence of 2007 - 2008. Most of us accept that William Ruto was not on the ground, wielding crude weapons and burning people in churches and homes, but certainly he had trusted goons on the ground coordinating and doing the actual work of stealing, murdering and destroying. It was not done by ghosts. Real people did the real crimes while Ruto was in Nairobi, vigorously arguing against the Kibaki Regime’s undemocratic electoral crimes. One of the most dangerous things, is an ill-equipped person, in a position of power, who has little to no moral foundation and no respect for others. Oscar Sudi is beginning to really imagine that he is the “Engineer” who can “panga panga” things for William Ruto. But consider the video clip in which he rudely forces his way between William and Rachel Ruto, pushing Rachel Ruto aside in the process, in a very self-absorbed officious manner. The behaviour seemed to be part of Oscar’s bid to “show his value and importance” by getting to the stage first and requesting the microphone for his mentor William Ruto. In Oscar Sudi’s mind he is being “helpful”, he is being “the man”, he is being “visible and powerful”. (Especially as he seeks to capitalise on the opportunity that the absence of Farouk Kibet affords. No doubt Oscar Sudi believes, as he has said before, that he can do both Farouk’s and Murkomen’s work more ‘effectively’.) Wananchi Watukufu. Ni mbayaaaa! People like Oscar Sudi are wielding power in the Ruto Administration. This is an unbelievably BAD situation. Oscar Sudi can be understood as something of an uneducated version of William Ruto, or for you older folks, a more primitive version of Idi Amin. The Ruto Organization, not the Ruto government, we mean the REAL Ruto Organization that actually makes decisions and runs things is grotesquely criminal and crude. Ruto, who himself is a thief and a criminal, is now having to come to terms with the fact that while he has used goons and various other forms of criminality to both enrich himself and claw himself to the top office, now that he IS in the top office, there is nobody above him to blame or undermine for his failures (though he is trying very hard to blame Uhuru Kenyatta). Ruto has neither the experience nor the personnel to run a legitimate operation. Imagine having Oscar Sudi, Yoweri Museveni, Hemedti, Aden Duale, Farouk Kibet and Wicknell Chivayo as your REAL cabinet/board of management in matters of strategic “national” interest? This is a bunch of PEOPLE WHO DO NOT CARE ABOUT KENYANS and MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE TO BE OF ANY INFLUENCE IN KENYAN AFFAIRS. Dear Wananchi Watukufu wa Kenya. If we do not take this terrible situation very seriously, we are well and truly FUCKED. Please realize the need to make absolutely sure that William Ruto and his rogues' gallery of criminals NEVER AGAIN, hold any public office, that their means to cause trouble are well and truly NEUTRALIZED, and, very importantly, that those who are Kenyan, face thorough INVESTIGATION, PROSECUTION and due JUSTICE under Kenyan Law and The Kenya Constitution. #WANTAM #RutoMustGoToJail

🤔Is Oscar Sudi, William Ruto’s “Political Engineer”, the Real Deputy President? To understand Oscar Sudi, is to understand his “creator” William Ruto. While Kipchumba Murkomen is preoccupied with watching pornography and scoring own-goals, and Kithure Kindiki keeps squeaking his farcical attempts at trying to appear of any consequence in the Mt. Kenya region, Oscar Sudi is busy, very busy getting shit done for Wiliam Ruto. Oscar Sudi is a powerful, loyal and effective William Ruto creation. Goon: historically and in traditional slang, it means a hired thug, a heavy-handed enforcer for a criminal boss, or a clumsy, foolish person. Oscar Sudi at different times presents as having all the attributes of a “goon”. We’ve been trying to understand this man, Oscar Sudi. Why is he such a prominent feature of the Ruto Regime? What are his skills, how does he think and what does he contribute to the people of Kapseret whom he is supposed to represent in Parliament. The August 1st, 2024, Obinna Show interview gives tremendous insight into this man Oscar Sudi. It is a very tedious watch and so we have tried to put together excerpts which capture the fascinating thinking of one of William Ruto’s most telling creations. Based on the interview and other sources of data, we have so far come to the following conclusions. Oscar Sudi is: - a political “goon” in the realest sense of the word - very cash rich - privy to many of Ruto’s darkest crimes - probably one of the top three figures in William Ruto’s “hustler organization” - resourceful in a criminal brutish way - very shrewd when it comes to instinctive execution - not formally educated - not well mannered - an ardent believer in, William Ruto in a very cultish way - without moral constraints - tribalistic but he does not believe that he is a tribalist - very insecure - very ambitious -very dangerous We already wrote about the illicit/criminal cash collection and cash deployment role Sudi “allegedly” plays in the Ruto Regime, so we shall not dwell on that. You can read about it in the “Would you Buy Lunch for Oscar Sudi?” Article. What we will touch on now are some other aspects of the Sudi phenomenon. It would seem that Oscar Sudi came from a very deprived background. But, he has proved himself to William Ruto, by being very industrious, and willing to do a lot of Ruto’s dirty business, including but not limited to serving as the CS for Matusi. For this, William Ruto has rewarded him with a lot of ill-gotten riches and power. The two are now mutually entwined and mutually obligated. We have very little doubt in our minds that Sudi is a murderer. He kind of has the mentality of a 'child soldier'. (Watch "Beasts of No Nation" on Netflix to get an insight into the world of child soldiers.) Sudi’s only compass seems to be directed by William Ruto, whom he idolizes. During the pretty shocking interview on the Obina Show, Oscar Sudi expressed his deep admiration for William Ruto. He also lashed out when asked what he’d do to anyone who would steal from Kapseret CDF resources. Throughout the interview, hints of a simmering viciousness were evident, but this particular issue triggered him. Our reading of the moment is as follows. In Oscar Sudi’s mind, anything William Ruto orders is okay. Anything William Ruto does not order is fair game. And whereas we are almost certain he has been involved in graft, in Sudi’s mind, graft is only bad when someone outside William Ruto’s approved list does it. We strongly suspect that Oscar Sudi was very involved on the ground during the genocidal Post Election Violence of 2007 - 2008. Most of us accept that William Ruto was not on the ground, wielding crude weapons and burning people in churches and homes, but certainly he had trusted goons on the ground coordinating and doing the actual work of stealing, murdering and destroying. It was not done by ghosts. Real people did the real crimes while Ruto was in Nairobi, vigorously arguing against the Kibaki Regime’s undemocratic electoral crimes. One of the most dangerous things, is an ill-equipped person, in a position of power, who has little to no moral foundation and no respect for others. Oscar Sudi is beginning to really imagine that he is the “Engineer” who can “panga panga” things for William Ruto. But consider the video clip in which he rudely forces his way between William and Rachel Ruto, pushing Rachel Ruto aside in the process, in a very self-absorbed officious manner. The behaviour seemed to be part of Oscar’s bid to “show his value and importance” by getting to the stage first and requesting the microphone for his mentor William Ruto. In Oscar Sudi’s mind he is being “helpful”, he is being “the man”, he is being “visible and powerful”. (Especially as he seeks to capitalise on the opportunity that the absence of Farouk Kibet affords. No doubt Oscar Sudi believes, as he has said before, that he can do both Farouk’s and Murkomen’s work more ‘effectively’.) Wananchi Watukufu. Ni mbayaaaa! People like Oscar Sudi are wielding power in the Ruto Administration. This is an unbelievably BAD situation. Oscar Sudi can be understood as something of an uneducated version of William Ruto, or for you older folks, a more primitive version of Idi Amin. The Ruto Organization, not the Ruto government, we mean the REAL Ruto Organization that actually makes decisions and runs things is grotesquely criminal and crude. Ruto, who himself is a thief and a criminal, is now having to come to terms with the fact that while he has used goons and various other forms of criminality to both enrich himself and claw himself to the top office, now that he IS in the top office, there is nobody above him to blame or undermine for his failures (though he is trying very hard to blame Uhuru Kenyatta). Ruto has neither the experience nor the personnel to run a legitimate operation. Imagine having Oscar Sudi, Yoweri Museveni, Hemedti, Aden Duale, Farouk Kibet and Wicknell Chivayo as your REAL cabinet/board of management in matters of strategic “national” interest? This is a bunch of PEOPLE WHO DO NOT CARE ABOUT KENYANS and MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE TO BE OF ANY INFLUENCE IN KENYAN AFFAIRS. Dear Wananchi Watukufu wa Kenya. If we do not take this terrible situation very seriously, we are well and truly FUCKED. Please realize the need to make absolutely sure that William Ruto and his rogues' gallery of criminals NEVER AGAIN, hold any public office, that their means to cause trouble are well and truly NEUTRALIZED, and, very importantly, that those who are Kenyan, face thorough INVESTIGATION, PROSECUTION and due JUSTICE under Kenyan Law and The Kenya Constitution. #WANTAM #RutoMustGoToJail

Gen Z Initiative

65,734 views • 16 days ago

💥IMPORTANT💥 🇳🇿IS NEW ZEALAND DESPERATE ENOUGH FOR RADICAL REFORM? Let's be honest. Are you sick and tired of the same old politics? Another pathetic Chris vs Chris election. Another election where Winston Peters decides who gets the keys to the Beehive. Another parade of recycled politicians asking for another chance. Another party list stacked with Misfits you've never voted for, quietly sneaking into Parliament through the back door. Where is the vision? Where is the courage? Where is the leadership that makes you believe New Zealand's best days are still ahead? I don't see it. Do you? ************ NZ IS NOT GOING FORWARD. NZ is going backwards. Every statistic that actually matters tells the story. ▪️ Families breaking apart. ▪️ Family harm climbing. ▪️ Child poverty. ▪️ Elderly poverty. ▪️ Homelessness. ▪️ Crime. ▪️ Drug addiction and meth devastating communities. ▪️ Mental health deteriorating. ▪️ Youth without hope. ▪️ Businesses closing. ▪️ Productivity falling. ▪️ Government debt exploding. ▪️ Kiwis leaving New Zealand in record numbers. Then politicians stand in front of cameras telling us everything is improving. They might believe it. New Zealanders don't. You can feel it. Something is fundamentally broken. This isn't the New Zealand we grew up loving. We've lost our way. And no one in Parliament seems capable of showing us the way back. ************ WE NEED REFORM Not another election. Not another slogan. Not another coalition of chaos. Not another reshuffle. Not another broken promise. A complete reform of our political system. Because here's the truth... The political parties aren't fixing New Zealand. They're protecting themselves. Parliament has become a fortress. Political parties protect political parties. Politicians protect politicians. The people come last. ************ PROJECT REFORM This is bigger than an election. This is about asking the question every Kiwi should now be asking... Is our political system still fit for purpose? Because if the system keeps producing failure... Maybe the system is the problem. ************ HERE'S WHAT REAL REFORM COULD LOOK LIKE 1. SLASH PARLIAMENT. Reduce Parliament from more than 120 MPs to 65 directly elected representatives. Smaller government. Less bureaucracy. Lower cost. More accountability. 2. SCRAP MMP. No more unelected List MPs. No more diversity or identity politics. No more party bosses deciding who gets into Parliament. If you want to represent New Zealand... Win your electorate. Earn it. 3. BREAK THE GRIP OF POLITICAL PARTIES. Political parties have become the gatekeepers of power. MPs spend more time being loyal to party leaders than loyal to voters. That has to end. Every representative should answer to the people who elected them. Not party headquarters. 4. DRAIN THE WELLINGTON SWAMP. Less bureaucracy. Less waste. Less career politics. More delivery. More accountability. More results. ************ A DIFFERENT KIND OF LEADERSHIP Imagine this... Instead of another politician who has climbed the ranks becoming Prime Minister... New Zealand elects a Visionary National Leader…a President…whose job is to build the strongest leadership team this country has ever seen. Not based on party politics. But based on excellence. The very best people New Zealand has to offer. Imagine selecting... ▪️ New Zealand's version of Elon Musk to rebuild our economy, modernise government, eliminate waste, introduce blockchain transparency for government spending, cut bureaucracy, reduce debt and put more money back into Kiwi pockets. ▪️ The nation's best educator leading education because they have actually produced outstanding results…not because they've climbed a political ladder. ▪️The country's best innovators. ▪️ The best business builders. ▪️ The best farmers. ▪️ The best infrastructure minds. ▪️ The best technology experts. ▪️ The best health leaders. A Dream Team of around twelve proven performers. Not academics. Not career politicians. Not people who've spent thirty years learning how to survive Parliament. People who've actually built things. Created jobs. Solved problems. Led organisations. Produced results. Real-world experience. Real accountability. Real leadership. Real Kiwis. ************ LOCAL PEOPLE STILL HAVE THE POWER Every electorate still elects its own representative. Every community still has its own voice. But instead of endless party games... Local representatives work alongside a national leadership team chosen because they are the very best in New Zealand. By the people. For the people. ************ WE ALSO NEED TO ASK THE BIG QUESTIONS If we truly want a new political system... Should New Zealand remain under the Commonwealth? Should we leave the monarchy? Why should we continue under a monarchy whose modern role has changed significantly from the one that existed when New Zealand was founded? Should New Zealand write a new Constitution that clearly defines: ▪️ Who we are. ▪️ What we value. ▪️ Our freedoms. ▪️ The limits of government. ▪️ The responsibilities of citizens. ▪️ Christianity as the founding faith that shaped this nation. These conversations shouldn't be feared. They should be had. ************ THIS ISN'T ABOUT ME Before anyone says it... No. I don't want to be President. My passion is seeing New Zealand finally get the leadership it deserves. I want my children... and my grandchildren... to inherit a nation that is stronger than the one we're leaving them today. I want to see moral leadership restored. Integrity restored. Common sense restored. Christian values honoured as the foundation that helped make New Zealand one of the greatest countries on earth. You don't have to be a Christian. But you should respect the values that built this nation. If the right visionary leader emerged, I would support them, and stand with them. Encourage them to never lose their way. I believe New Zealand needs an independent Accountability and Integrity Authority…a body with real teeth that holds every leader, every politician, and every public official to the highest standards of honest, transparency, and moral responsibility. Power without accountability always ends in corruption. Government must answer to the people. Not just on election day. Every day. That’s the kind of nation I want my grandchildren to inherit. ************ THE POLITICAL CLASS WILL NEVER DO THIS Why would they? This reform reduces their power. Reduces their numbers. Breaks their control. Ends the political party cartels. Exposes corruption. And puts every leader through a constant test of character, integrity and accountability. They're being asked to vote for their own redundancy. It won't come from Parliament. It must come from the people. ************ SO I'M ASKING ONE QUESTION. Is New Zealand desperate enough for reform yet? Or are we going to vote for the best of a bad bunch... Yet again. This election. Another coalition. Another compromise. Another three years. Another decline. History shows nations can change. Countries have transformed themselves through bold political reform. Just look at El Savador with Bukele and Argentina with Mikele. The question isn't whether it's possible. The question is... Are Kiwis ready? Or do we need to suffer a little longer before enough people finally say... Enough. ************ JOIN PROJECT REFORM This is not a political movement. This is a movement to reform New Zealand for the next generation. To install visionary leadership. Install accountability. Restore freedom. Restore prosperity. Restore hope. And if you believe you're one of the movers and shakers New Zealand needs... A nation builder. An innovator. A business leader. A proven problem-solver. Reach out to me. Project Reform needs New Zealand's best minds to help rebuild this nation. This is no longer... Left vs Right. National vs Labour. Chris vs Chris. This is now... THE PEOPLE vs THE POLITICIANS. The question is... Are you ready to do something different. Are you ready to Reform NZ? Join PROJECT REFORM here:

💥IMPORTANT💥 🇳🇿IS NEW ZEALAND DESPERATE ENOUGH FOR RADICAL REFORM? Let's be honest. Are you sick and tired of the same old politics? Another pathetic Chris vs Chris election. Another election where Winston Peters decides who gets the keys to the Beehive. Another parade of recycled politicians asking for another chance. Another party list stacked with Misfits you've never voted for, quietly sneaking into Parliament through the back door. Where is the vision? Where is the courage? Where is the leadership that makes you believe New Zealand's best days are still ahead? I don't see it. Do you? NZ IS NOT GOING FORWARD. NZ is going backwards. Every statistic that actually matters tells the story. ▪️ Families breaking apart. ▪️ Family harm climbing. ▪️ Child poverty. ▪️ Elderly poverty. ▪️ Homelessness. ▪️ Crime. ▪️ Drug addiction and meth devastating communities. ▪️ Mental health deteriorating. ▪️ Youth without hope. ▪️ Businesses closing. ▪️ Productivity falling. ▪️ Government debt exploding. ▪️ Kiwis leaving New Zealand in record numbers. Then politicians stand in front of cameras telling us everything is improving. They might believe it. New Zealanders don't. You can feel it. Something is fundamentally broken. This isn't the New Zealand we grew up loving. We've lost our way. And no one in Parliament seems capable of showing us the way back. WE NEED REFORM Not another election. Not another slogan. Not another coalition of chaos. Not another reshuffle. Not another broken promise. A complete reform of our political system. Because here's the truth... The political parties aren't fixing New Zealand. They're protecting themselves. Parliament has become a fortress. Political parties protect political parties. Politicians protect politicians. The people come last. PROJECT REFORM This is bigger than an election. This is about asking the question every Kiwi should now be asking... Is our political system still fit for purpose? Because if the system keeps producing failure... Maybe the system is the problem. HERE'S WHAT REAL REFORM COULD LOOK LIKE 1. SLASH PARLIAMENT. Reduce Parliament from more than 120 MPs to 65 directly elected representatives. Smaller government. Less bureaucracy. Lower cost. More accountability. 2. SCRAP MMP. No more unelected List MPs. No more diversity or identity politics. No more party bosses deciding who gets into Parliament. If you want to represent New Zealand... Win your electorate. Earn it. 3. BREAK THE GRIP OF POLITICAL PARTIES. Political parties have become the gatekeepers of power. MPs spend more time being loyal to party leaders than loyal to voters. That has to end. Every representative should answer to the people who elected them. Not party headquarters. 4. DRAIN THE WELLINGTON SWAMP. Less bureaucracy. Less waste. Less career politics. More delivery. More accountability. More results. A DIFFERENT KIND OF LEADERSHIP Imagine this... Instead of another politician who has climbed the ranks becoming Prime Minister... New Zealand elects a Visionary National Leader…a President…whose job is to build the strongest leadership team this country has ever seen. Not based on party politics. But based on excellence. The very best people New Zealand has to offer. Imagine selecting... ▪️ New Zealand's version of Elon Musk to rebuild our economy, modernise government, eliminate waste, introduce blockchain transparency for government spending, cut bureaucracy, reduce debt and put more money back into Kiwi pockets. ▪️ The nation's best educator leading education because they have actually produced outstanding results…not because they've climbed a political ladder. ▪️The country's best innovators. ▪️ The best business builders. ▪️ The best farmers. ▪️ The best infrastructure minds. ▪️ The best technology experts. ▪️ The best health leaders. A Dream Team of around twelve proven performers. Not academics. Not career politicians. Not people who've spent thirty years learning how to survive Parliament. People who've actually built things. Created jobs. Solved problems. Led organisations. Produced results. Real-world experience. Real accountability. Real leadership. Real Kiwis. LOCAL PEOPLE STILL HAVE THE POWER Every electorate still elects its own representative. Every community still has its own voice. But instead of endless party games... Local representatives work alongside a national leadership team chosen because they are the very best in New Zealand. By the people. For the people. WE ALSO NEED TO ASK THE BIG QUESTIONS If we truly want a new political system... Should New Zealand remain under the Commonwealth? Should we leave the monarchy? Why should we continue under a monarchy whose modern role has changed significantly from the one that existed when New Zealand was founded? Should New Zealand write a new Constitution that clearly defines: ▪️ Who we are. ▪️ What we value. ▪️ Our freedoms. ▪️ The limits of government. ▪️ The responsibilities of citizens. ▪️ Christianity as the founding faith that shaped this nation. These conversations shouldn't be feared. They should be had. THIS ISN'T ABOUT ME Before anyone says it... No. I don't want to be President. My passion is seeing New Zealand finally get the leadership it deserves. I want my children... and my grandchildren... to inherit a nation that is stronger than the one we're leaving them today. I want to see moral leadership restored. Integrity restored. Common sense restored. Christian values honoured as the foundation that helped make New Zealand one of the greatest countries on earth. You don't have to be a Christian. But you should respect the values that built this nation. If the right visionary leader emerged, I would support them, and stand with them. Encourage them to never lose their way. I believe New Zealand needs an independent Accountability and Integrity Authority…a body with real teeth that holds every leader, every politician, and every public official to the highest standards of honest, transparency, and moral responsibility. Power without accountability always ends in corruption. Government must answer to the people. Not just on election day. Every day. That’s the kind of nation I want my grandchildren to inherit. THE POLITICAL CLASS WILL NEVER DO THIS Why would they? This reform reduces their power. Reduces their numbers. Breaks their control. Ends the political party cartels. Exposes corruption. And puts every leader through a constant test of character, integrity and accountability. They're being asked to vote for their own redundancy. It won't come from Parliament. It must come from the people. SO I'M ASKING ONE QUESTION. Is New Zealand desperate enough for reform yet? Or are we going to vote for the best of a bad bunch... Yet again. This election. Another coalition. Another compromise. Another three years. Another decline. History shows nations can change. Countries have transformed themselves through bold political reform. Just look at El Savador with Bukele and Argentina with Mikele. The question isn't whether it's possible. The question is... Are Kiwis ready? Or do we need to suffer a little longer before enough people finally say... Enough. JOIN PROJECT REFORM This is not a political movement. This is a movement to reform New Zealand for the next generation. To install visionary leadership. Install accountability. Restore freedom. Restore prosperity. Restore hope. And if you believe you're one of the movers and shakers New Zealand needs... A nation builder. An innovator. A business leader. A proven problem-solver. Reach out to me. Project Reform needs New Zealand's best minds to help rebuild this nation. This is no longer... Left vs Right. National vs Labour. Chris vs Chris. This is now... THE PEOPLE vs THE POLITICIANS. The question is... Are you ready to do something different. Are you ready to Reform NZ? Join PROJECT REFORM here:

Brian Tamaki

11,156 views • 1 month ago

As we reach the end of the clusterf*ck that is the first month of Mad King Don’s rule. The hard right believe the 2 years of preparation by the Heritage Foundation on their ‘Mandate for Leadership’ (Project 2025) has paid off. They arrived in office ready to burn government to the ground and the Democrat’s answer? Chuck Schumer dad dancing and chanting ‘We will win’. No chuck YOU F*CKING LOST BIGLY. You lost the White House, the House and the Senate and more significantly the popular vote. This is no longer about Republicans and Democrats, this is about the Trump Party and Democrats. In this new political world, traditional Dem political thinking is completely irrelevant. However, Dems persist with the same old same old, which is shocking to me. It’s as if they think ‘We can deal with it at the next election’. Wake the f*ck up! NOTHING and I mean NOTHING will ever be the same again nobody is coming to save you. Democrats can blame their election loss on ‘stupid ignorant voters’ all day every day. They can say, ‘It’s their fault, we tried to warn them and they took no notice’. I’ve forgotten how many times I’ve read this on social media. It is both arrogant and utterly delusional. Democrats FAILED the American people. It really is as simple as that. I was part of that failure and I’m happy to own it, however uncomfortable that might feel. Dems have to understand what went wrong and learn from the mistakes made. Finding anyone in Democratic leadership to admit fault, is like trying to find rocking horse shit. They were still having a mocha flat white made with Peruvian goat’s milk, while Elon was skinning and gutting the government, terminating tens of thousands of federal jobs and cutting hundreds of vital services that their base can’t survive without. There should have been a Dem war room stood up immediately after the election loss, to prepare for what they surely knew what was to come. Let’s be Crystal clear. Dems spent over a billion dollars on a campaign in which they got their ass handed them on a plate by a convicted criminal and adjudicated rapist. Take a moment to think about that, then tell me it’s the voter’s fault, because that’s what they’re saying. It’s lamentable when your message is ‘The other guy is a fascist, vote for me’, oh and ‘we’re for abortion’. Trump didn’t win this election, Dems handed it to him gift wrapped with a big red bow. This was born of a failure to use the midterms to transition from a man who had been a transformative president, to the next generation of Dem leaders. It’s almost embarrassing the depth of political talent in the Democrat party right now. Yet hubris got in the way and handed America to Trump. They didn’t learn a thing from 2016. Everybody loves an underdog, especially a reality TV underdog. In 2020, given Trump’s catastrophic handling of the COVID pandemic, Dems should have won in a landslide. There should have been no opportunity for Trump to question the election, because the win should have been too big to even entertain challenging the result. There was absolutely no recognition of that by Dem leadership. They were just happy they won. Big mistake. In 2022 the backlash from the overturning of Roe v Wade halted Republicans to the point where the red wave never materialised. From this point on, abortion rights became the flagship of the Dem platform, to the exclusion of EVERYTHING including immigration which was unbelievably stupid. They failed to articulate the phenomenal economy Biden had rebuilt, preferring to focus instead on ‘the other guy is a fascist’ argument. More important, the focus was on the middle class not the working class. After just one month of Mad King Don, it will take a generation to recover from the catastrophic damage he has caused. Without leadership, the American people are adrift in an ocean of lies and despair, excluding MAGAs of course who are cheering themselves into economic slavery while smashing themselves in the face daily.

As we reach the end of the clusterfck that is the first month of Mad King Don’s rule. The hard right believe the 2 years of preparation by the Heritage Foundation on their ‘Mandate for Leadership’ (Project 2025) has paid off. They arrived in office ready to burn government to the ground and the Democrat’s answer? Chuck Schumer dad dancing and chanting ‘We will win’. No chuck YOU FCKING LOST BIGLY. You lost the White House, the House and the Senate and more significantly the popular vote. This is no longer about Republicans and Democrats, this is about the Trump Party and Democrats. In this new political world, traditional Dem political thinking is completely irrelevant. However, Dems persist with the same old same old, which is shocking to me. It’s as if they think ‘We can deal with it at the next election’. Wake the f*ck up! NOTHING and I mean NOTHING will ever be the same again nobody is coming to save you. Democrats can blame their election loss on ‘stupid ignorant voters’ all day every day. They can say, ‘It’s their fault, we tried to warn them and they took no notice’. I’ve forgotten how many times I’ve read this on social media. It is both arrogant and utterly delusional. Democrats FAILED the American people. It really is as simple as that. I was part of that failure and I’m happy to own it, however uncomfortable that might feel. Dems have to understand what went wrong and learn from the mistakes made. Finding anyone in Democratic leadership to admit fault, is like trying to find rocking horse shit. They were still having a mocha flat white made with Peruvian goat’s milk, while Elon was skinning and gutting the government, terminating tens of thousands of federal jobs and cutting hundreds of vital services that their base can’t survive without. There should have been a Dem war room stood up immediately after the election loss, to prepare for what they surely knew what was to come. Let’s be Crystal clear. Dems spent over a billion dollars on a campaign in which they got their ass handed them on a plate by a convicted criminal and adjudicated rapist. Take a moment to think about that, then tell me it’s the voter’s fault, because that’s what they’re saying. It’s lamentable when your message is ‘The other guy is a fascist, vote for me’, oh and ‘we’re for abortion’. Trump didn’t win this election, Dems handed it to him gift wrapped with a big red bow. This was born of a failure to use the midterms to transition from a man who had been a transformative president, to the next generation of Dem leaders. It’s almost embarrassing the depth of political talent in the Democrat party right now. Yet hubris got in the way and handed America to Trump. They didn’t learn a thing from 2016. Everybody loves an underdog, especially a reality TV underdog. In 2020, given Trump’s catastrophic handling of the COVID pandemic, Dems should have won in a landslide. There should have been no opportunity for Trump to question the election, because the win should have been too big to even entertain challenging the result. There was absolutely no recognition of that by Dem leadership. They were just happy they won. Big mistake. In 2022 the backlash from the overturning of Roe v Wade halted Republicans to the point where the red wave never materialised. From this point on, abortion rights became the flagship of the Dem platform, to the exclusion of EVERYTHING including immigration which was unbelievably stupid. They failed to articulate the phenomenal economy Biden had rebuilt, preferring to focus instead on ‘the other guy is a fascist’ argument. More important, the focus was on the middle class not the working class. After just one month of Mad King Don, it will take a generation to recover from the catastrophic damage he has caused. Without leadership, the American people are adrift in an ocean of lies and despair, excluding MAGAs of course who are cheering themselves into economic slavery while smashing themselves in the face daily.

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

193,256 views • 1 year ago

Ontario vaccine coercion persists 🍁💉 Students across the province face suspension threats over compelled medical data disclosure by public health, an entirely separate ministry. Vaccine coercion in 2026 continues to loom over Ontario's education system, pitting public health demands against families' rights to privacy and, once again, disrupting the learning of thousands of children. Parents of students in publicly funded schools are under pressure to disclose their children's confidential vaccine records, or risk severe penalties, including lengthy suspensions that disrupt young lives and fly in the face of established legal safeguards. At the heart of this ongoing controversy is Public Health Ontario's relentless pursuit of students' immunization data, which is funnelled into third-party systems like Panorama and potentially integrated into the World Health Organization's broader global surveillance architecture. The latest threat order comes out of Hamilton, where public health officials have begun issuing suspension orders to families whose records fall short of their standards. Suspension notices are being distributed to parents for the 2025-2026 school year, threatening that non-compliance will lead to prolonged denial of education. Thousands of students could face removal from class for up to 20 days — a full month of missed education. The issue becomes troubling when relevant legislation is cross-referenced, such as Ontario's Education Act, which stipulates that extended suspensions are reserved for severe offences, like drug trafficking, physical assault, or persistent abusive behaviour that is not remedied by other interventions. Even in those most extreme and aggressive cases, the act lays out how principals must carefully consider mitigating factors: a student's capacity to regulate behaviour or grasp consequences, potential risks to school safety, personal background including trauma, prior disciplinary measures, any ties to harassment or discrimination, the child's age, and the overall educational impact. Moreover, for suspensions exceeding 11 days, schools are legally obligated to provide alternative programs that blend academic support with behavioural resources, such as anger management, substance abuse counselling, or life-skills training. Even though only a school principal has the authority to suspend, enshrining protections for students' well-being and due process, public health units are circumventing these rules through the Immunization of School Pupils Act (ISPA), demanding access to private medical information under threat of school exclusion. This approach blatantly infringes on the Education Act's framework, showing little regard for the social, emotional, mental, and academic toll on children yanked from their routines for weeks on end. Ontario stands alone in Canada for enforcing such measures, which makes sense given the government's intent on making the province a hub for pharmaceutical interests. All of this comes on the heels of alarming educational setbacks faced by Ontario students. Recent provincial testing data from December revealed that half of Grade 6 students and 42% of Grade 9 students are not meeting math standards, with reading and writing proficiency also lagging. These struggles follow Ontario's prolonged COVID-19 school closures—the longest and most stringent in the nation — which isolated children at length to their developmental detriment. Public health's single-minded focus on data collection turns students into unwitting pawns in this coercive game. Parents who insist on adherence to Education Act protocols have reported harsh and dehumanizing actions. Instead of fulfilling their duties, some principals have resorted to isolating children from classmates, confining them to small offices or rooms, denying recess and outdoor access, revoking bus privileges, and even involving children's aid societies when families persist in sending their kids to school when legislated suspension protocols aren’t followed. These tactics not only dehumanize innocent children but also violate privacy laws. The Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) mandates informed consent for collecting or sharing health data, explicitly prohibiting coercion. Yet suspension threats are a classic form of duress, effectively compelling the surrender of sensitive information or face educational exile. Meanwhile, data breaches in Canadian systems have exposed millions of records, making health data a prime target for cybercriminals with a hefty price tag on the black market. Why should parents entrust centralized public health databases with children’s medical data, especially when it's being leveraged against access to public education? While exemptions under ISPA exist for medical, religious, or philosophical reasons, they offer little tangible relief, as it still compels entry into leak-prone databases. Most importantly, statements of conscience must reflect parents' own words, and not be pre-drafted forms laced with guilt-inducing warnings about endangering public health, which undermine true voluntary consent. “With the decision to delay or refuse vaccines, you are accepting responsibility that you are putting your child’s health and even life at risk,” the legally binding exemption affidavit reads. This clash between ISPA, PHIPA and the Education Act leaves children caught in a coercive crossfire. No student should be forced to trade privacy for a seat in class. In an attempt to seek accountability, Rebel News contacted Education Minister Paul Calandra, ministry media contacts, and the Premier's Office. Despite ample taxpayer-funded resources for communications, no response was received. Ontario's children deserve an education free from surveillance and intimidation. Coercion and bullying have no place in our schools, whether it be among peers or directed at students by the powers that be.

Ontario vaccine coercion persists 🍁💉 Students across the province face suspension threats over compelled medical data disclosure by public health, an entirely separate ministry. Vaccine coercion in 2026 continues to loom over Ontario's education system, pitting public health demands against families' rights to privacy and, once again, disrupting the learning of thousands of children. Parents of students in publicly funded schools are under pressure to disclose their children's confidential vaccine records, or risk severe penalties, including lengthy suspensions that disrupt young lives and fly in the face of established legal safeguards. At the heart of this ongoing controversy is Public Health Ontario's relentless pursuit of students' immunization data, which is funnelled into third-party systems like Panorama and potentially integrated into the World Health Organization's broader global surveillance architecture. The latest threat order comes out of Hamilton, where public health officials have begun issuing suspension orders to families whose records fall short of their standards. Suspension notices are being distributed to parents for the 2025-2026 school year, threatening that non-compliance will lead to prolonged denial of education. Thousands of students could face removal from class for up to 20 days — a full month of missed education. The issue becomes troubling when relevant legislation is cross-referenced, such as Ontario's Education Act, which stipulates that extended suspensions are reserved for severe offences, like drug trafficking, physical assault, or persistent abusive behaviour that is not remedied by other interventions. Even in those most extreme and aggressive cases, the act lays out how principals must carefully consider mitigating factors: a student's capacity to regulate behaviour or grasp consequences, potential risks to school safety, personal background including trauma, prior disciplinary measures, any ties to harassment or discrimination, the child's age, and the overall educational impact. Moreover, for suspensions exceeding 11 days, schools are legally obligated to provide alternative programs that blend academic support with behavioural resources, such as anger management, substance abuse counselling, or life-skills training. Even though only a school principal has the authority to suspend, enshrining protections for students' well-being and due process, public health units are circumventing these rules through the Immunization of School Pupils Act (ISPA), demanding access to private medical information under threat of school exclusion. This approach blatantly infringes on the Education Act's framework, showing little regard for the social, emotional, mental, and academic toll on children yanked from their routines for weeks on end. Ontario stands alone in Canada for enforcing such measures, which makes sense given the government's intent on making the province a hub for pharmaceutical interests. All of this comes on the heels of alarming educational setbacks faced by Ontario students. Recent provincial testing data from December revealed that half of Grade 6 students and 42% of Grade 9 students are not meeting math standards, with reading and writing proficiency also lagging. These struggles follow Ontario's prolonged COVID-19 school closures—the longest and most stringent in the nation — which isolated children at length to their developmental detriment. Public health's single-minded focus on data collection turns students into unwitting pawns in this coercive game. Parents who insist on adherence to Education Act protocols have reported harsh and dehumanizing actions. Instead of fulfilling their duties, some principals have resorted to isolating children from classmates, confining them to small offices or rooms, denying recess and outdoor access, revoking bus privileges, and even involving children's aid societies when families persist in sending their kids to school when legislated suspension protocols aren’t followed. These tactics not only dehumanize innocent children but also violate privacy laws. The Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) mandates informed consent for collecting or sharing health data, explicitly prohibiting coercion. Yet suspension threats are a classic form of duress, effectively compelling the surrender of sensitive information or face educational exile. Meanwhile, data breaches in Canadian systems have exposed millions of records, making health data a prime target for cybercriminals with a hefty price tag on the black market. Why should parents entrust centralized public health databases with children’s medical data, especially when it's being leveraged against access to public education? While exemptions under ISPA exist for medical, religious, or philosophical reasons, they offer little tangible relief, as it still compels entry into leak-prone databases. Most importantly, statements of conscience must reflect parents' own words, and not be pre-drafted forms laced with guilt-inducing warnings about endangering public health, which undermine true voluntary consent. “With the decision to delay or refuse vaccines, you are accepting responsibility that you are putting your child’s health and even life at risk,” the legally binding exemption affidavit reads. This clash between ISPA, PHIPA and the Education Act leaves children caught in a coercive crossfire. No student should be forced to trade privacy for a seat in class. In an attempt to seek accountability, Rebel News contacted Education Minister Paul Calandra, ministry media contacts, and the Premier's Office. Despite ample taxpayer-funded resources for communications, no response was received. Ontario's children deserve an education free from surveillance and intimidation. Coercion and bullying have no place in our schools, whether it be among peers or directed at students by the powers that be.

Rebel News

19,657 views • 7 months ago

President Xi’s New Year Address On New Year's Eve, Chinese President Xi Jinping delivered his 2026 New Year message through China Media Group and the internet. The following is the full text of the message: Greetings to all! Year after year, life opens a fresh chapter. As the new year begins, I extend my best wishes to you from Beijing! The year 2025 marks the completion of China's 14th Five-Year Plan for economic and social development. Over the past five years, we have pressed ahead with enterprise and fortitude, and overcome many difficulties and challenges. We met the targets in the Plan and made solid advances on the new journey of Chinese modernization. Our economic output has crossed thresholds one after another, and it is expected to reach RMB 140 trillion yuan this year. Our economic strength, scientific and technological abilities, defense capabilities, and composite national strength all reached new heights. Clear waters and lush mountains have become a salient feature of our landscape. Our people enjoy a growing sense of gain, happiness and security. The past five years have been a truly remarkable journey, and our accomplishments have not come easily. Your unwavering hard work has made our nation thrive and prosper. I salute you all for your exceptional diligence and invaluable contributions. This year is full of indelible memories. We solemnly commemorated the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, and established the Taiwan Recovery Day. These grand national events were majestic and powerful, and the glory of victory will shine through the pages of history. They are inspiring all the sons and daughters of the Chinese nation to remember history, honor fallen heroes, cherish peace, and create a better future. They are rallying a mighty force for the great rejuvenation of our nation. We sought to energize high-quality development through innovation. We integrated science and technology deeply with industries, and made a stream of new innovations. Many large AI models have been competing in a race to the top, and breakthroughs have been achieved in the research and development of our own chips. All this has turned China into one of the economies with the fastest growing innovation capabilities. The Tianwen-2 probe began its star-chasing journey to explore asteroids and comets. Construction of the hydropower project at the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River started. China's first aircraft carrier equipped with an electromagnetic catapult system was officially commissioned. Humanoid robots did kung fu kicks, and drones performed spectacular light shows. Inventions and innovations have boosted new quality productive forces and added colorful dimensions to our lives. We endeavored to nurture our spiritual home with cultural development. There was a surging public interest in cultural relics, museums, and intangible cultural heritage. A new Chinese cultural site was added to the World Heritage List. Cultural IPs such as Wukong and Nezha became global hits. The younger generation came to deem classic Chinese culture as the finest form of aesthetic expression. The cultural and tourism sectors thrived. The "super league" football games in our cities and villages attracted numerous fans. Ice and snow sports ignited people's passion for the winter season. Tradition is now embracing modernity, and the Chinese culture is shining in even greater splendor. We joined hands to build a better life and enjoyed it together. I attended celebrations in Xizang and Xinjiang. From the snow-covered plateau to both sides of the Tianshan Mountains, people of various ethnic groups are united as one, like seeds of a pomegranate sticking together. With white khatas and passionate singing and dancing, they expressed their love of the motherland and the happiness they enjoy. No issue of the people is too small; we care for every leaf and tend every branch in the garden of people's well-being. Over the past year, the rights and interests of the workforce in new forms of employment have been better protected, facilities have been upgraded to bring more convenience to the elderly, and each family with childcare needs has received a subsidy of RMB 300 yuan per month. When the happy hum of daily life fills every home, the big family of our nation will go from strength to strength. We continued to embrace the world with open arms. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization Summit in Tianjin and the Global Leaders' Meeting on Women were very successful; and island-wide special customs operations were launched in the Hainan Free Trade Port. To better address climate change, China announced new Nationally Determined Contributions. After announcing the three global initiatives on development, security, and civilization, I put forward the Global Governance Initiative to promote a more just and equitable global governance system. The world today is undergoing both changes and turbulence, and some regions are still engulfed in war. China always stands on the right side of history, and is ready to work with all countries to advance world peace and development and build a community with a shared future for humanity. Not long ago, I attended the opening ceremony of the National Games, and I was glad to see Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao coming together in unity and acting in unison. We should unswervingly implement the policy of One Country, Two Systems, and support Hong Kong and Macao in better integrating into the overall development of our country and maintaining long-term prosperity and stability. We Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait share a bond of blood and kinship. The reunification of our motherland, a trend of the times, is unstoppable! Only a strong Communist Party of China can make our country strong. We launched the study and education program on fully implementing the central Party leadership's eight-point decision on improving Party and government conduct. We exercised strict governance of the Party through credible measures, and promoted the Party's self-revolution to fight corruption and advance healthy governance. As a result, the conduct of our Party and government steadily improved. We must stay true to our original aspiration and founding mission, and pursue our goal with perseverance and dedication. We should continue to give a good answer to the question on how to maintain long-term governance put forth in a cave dwelling in Yan'an and prove ourselves worthy of the people's expectation in the new era. The year 2026 marks the beginning of the 15th Five-Year Plan. A successful venture should start with a good plan and with clear goals set. We should focus on our goals and tasks, boost confidence, and build momentum to press ahead. We should take solid steps to promote high-quality development, further deepen reform and opening up across the board, deliver prosperity for all, and write a new chapter in the story of China's miracle. The dream lofty, the journey long-bold strides will get us there. Let us charge ahead like horses with courage, vitality, and energy, fight for our dreams and our happiness, and turn our great vision into beautiful realities. The sun of the new year will soon rise. May our great motherland stand in magnificence! May the fields across the country deliver good harvest! May our nation bathe in the glory of the morning! May you all enjoy life to the fullest, and achieve every success! May all your dreams come true!

President Xi’s New Year Address On New Year's Eve, Chinese President Xi Jinping delivered his 2026 New Year message through China Media Group and the internet. The following is the full text of the message: Greetings to all! Year after year, life opens a fresh chapter. As the new year begins, I extend my best wishes to you from Beijing! The year 2025 marks the completion of China's 14th Five-Year Plan for economic and social development. Over the past five years, we have pressed ahead with enterprise and fortitude, and overcome many difficulties and challenges. We met the targets in the Plan and made solid advances on the new journey of Chinese modernization. Our economic output has crossed thresholds one after another, and it is expected to reach RMB 140 trillion yuan this year. Our economic strength, scientific and technological abilities, defense capabilities, and composite national strength all reached new heights. Clear waters and lush mountains have become a salient feature of our landscape. Our people enjoy a growing sense of gain, happiness and security. The past five years have been a truly remarkable journey, and our accomplishments have not come easily. Your unwavering hard work has made our nation thrive and prosper. I salute you all for your exceptional diligence and invaluable contributions. This year is full of indelible memories. We solemnly commemorated the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, and established the Taiwan Recovery Day. These grand national events were majestic and powerful, and the glory of victory will shine through the pages of history. They are inspiring all the sons and daughters of the Chinese nation to remember history, honor fallen heroes, cherish peace, and create a better future. They are rallying a mighty force for the great rejuvenation of our nation. We sought to energize high-quality development through innovation. We integrated science and technology deeply with industries, and made a stream of new innovations. Many large AI models have been competing in a race to the top, and breakthroughs have been achieved in the research and development of our own chips. All this has turned China into one of the economies with the fastest growing innovation capabilities. The Tianwen-2 probe began its star-chasing journey to explore asteroids and comets. Construction of the hydropower project at the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River started. China's first aircraft carrier equipped with an electromagnetic catapult system was officially commissioned. Humanoid robots did kung fu kicks, and drones performed spectacular light shows. Inventions and innovations have boosted new quality productive forces and added colorful dimensions to our lives. We endeavored to nurture our spiritual home with cultural development. There was a surging public interest in cultural relics, museums, and intangible cultural heritage. A new Chinese cultural site was added to the World Heritage List. Cultural IPs such as Wukong and Nezha became global hits. The younger generation came to deem classic Chinese culture as the finest form of aesthetic expression. The cultural and tourism sectors thrived. The "super league" football games in our cities and villages attracted numerous fans. Ice and snow sports ignited people's passion for the winter season. Tradition is now embracing modernity, and the Chinese culture is shining in even greater splendor. We joined hands to build a better life and enjoyed it together. I attended celebrations in Xizang and Xinjiang. From the snow-covered plateau to both sides of the Tianshan Mountains, people of various ethnic groups are united as one, like seeds of a pomegranate sticking together. With white khatas and passionate singing and dancing, they expressed their love of the motherland and the happiness they enjoy. No issue of the people is too small; we care for every leaf and tend every branch in the garden of people's well-being. Over the past year, the rights and interests of the workforce in new forms of employment have been better protected, facilities have been upgraded to bring more convenience to the elderly, and each family with childcare needs has received a subsidy of RMB 300 yuan per month. When the happy hum of daily life fills every home, the big family of our nation will go from strength to strength. We continued to embrace the world with open arms. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization Summit in Tianjin and the Global Leaders' Meeting on Women were very successful; and island-wide special customs operations were launched in the Hainan Free Trade Port. To better address climate change, China announced new Nationally Determined Contributions. After announcing the three global initiatives on development, security, and civilization, I put forward the Global Governance Initiative to promote a more just and equitable global governance system. The world today is undergoing both changes and turbulence, and some regions are still engulfed in war. China always stands on the right side of history, and is ready to work with all countries to advance world peace and development and build a community with a shared future for humanity. Not long ago, I attended the opening ceremony of the National Games, and I was glad to see Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao coming together in unity and acting in unison. We should unswervingly implement the policy of One Country, Two Systems, and support Hong Kong and Macao in better integrating into the overall development of our country and maintaining long-term prosperity and stability. We Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait share a bond of blood and kinship. The reunification of our motherland, a trend of the times, is unstoppable! Only a strong Communist Party of China can make our country strong. We launched the study and education program on fully implementing the central Party leadership's eight-point decision on improving Party and government conduct. We exercised strict governance of the Party through credible measures, and promoted the Party's self-revolution to fight corruption and advance healthy governance. As a result, the conduct of our Party and government steadily improved. We must stay true to our original aspiration and founding mission, and pursue our goal with perseverance and dedication. We should continue to give a good answer to the question on how to maintain long-term governance put forth in a cave dwelling in Yan'an and prove ourselves worthy of the people's expectation in the new era. The year 2026 marks the beginning of the 15th Five-Year Plan. A successful venture should start with a good plan and with clear goals set. We should focus on our goals and tasks, boost confidence, and build momentum to press ahead. We should take solid steps to promote high-quality development, further deepen reform and opening up across the board, deliver prosperity for all, and write a new chapter in the story of China's miracle. The dream lofty, the journey long-bold strides will get us there. Let us charge ahead like horses with courage, vitality, and energy, fight for our dreams and our happiness, and turn our great vision into beautiful realities. The sun of the new year will soon rise. May our great motherland stand in magnificence! May the fields across the country deliver good harvest! May our nation bathe in the glory of the morning! May you all enjoy life to the fullest, and achieve every success! May all your dreams come true!

China Perspective

27,604 views • 8 months ago

Let’s get one thing straight before they gaslight you into swallowing this. This is NOT just about “age verification” so kids can’t scroll TikTok. The under-16s social media ban, and the under-18s VPN ban, is digital verification for everyone; because the only way to enforce it is to make every single person prove their age, prove their identity, and “check in” with the State before accessing the modern internet. And yes… you already know where it leads. OneLogin. A centralised identity system designed to collect your credentials and your biometrics (face, iris, fingerprint) and bind them to a single government account. This ban is not the end goal. It is one verification type. One tiny draconian token. One single piece of the Digital ID puzzle. And the equation remains the same: OneLogin + GOV Wallet = Digital ID. Age verification will become one token on that wallet, but first, before the wallet is fully normalised, before it’s “rolled out” to every citizen through exclusion and coercion, they’ll do what they always do: They’ll introduce the gate first. To access a VPN, a social media site, or even an AI tool, you will be forced to “prove” you are over 16 or 18 — and the proof won’t be a private check, or a local device setting, or a parental control. It will be a government check. A government login. A government permission slip. You will have to “check in” with GOV OneLogin to access the internet like a normal person — and soon enough a token for this will be issued into the GOV Wallet, just like the proposed BritCard token that has now allegedly been “scrapped.” This is the same system, the same architecture, the same rollout pattern... just with a different sticker slapped on the front. And once the token exists, it becomes the default. Once it becomes the default, it becomes the requirement. Once it becomes the requirement, it becomes the leash. Because what they’re building is not an age gate. It’s a permission gate. A surveillance gate. A system where your ability to access platforms, services, information, communication — your ability to exist online — becomes conditional on your compliance with a credential check that is logged, tracked, and centrally controlled. They will see what you do. When you do it. What you search. What you access. What you post. And people will still be saying, with a straight face: “Well, it’s a good thing under-16s are being banned from social media… they’ll be safer.” That’s the bait. Then you hear Starmer say: “How will parents police this alone?” And notice what he’s really saying. He is not empowering parents. He is positioning the government next to parents, granting the State the same “authority” to parent your child, to decide what is healthy, what is harmful, what is permitted, what is “wellbeing,” and what must be restricted. The same government that has lied to you for years about safety. The same government that signs away your rights in the name of protection. The same government that cannot define a woman, cannot secure a border, cannot arrest a p3dophile (rather employs and promotes them), cannot run a hospital — but somehow wants you to believe it can be trusted to police your child’s mind. And if you think this is going through “proper process,” think again. A month ago they announced a consultation on the under-16s ban. That consultation is a red herring. Because Starmer’s little phrase “Fast Track” is just PR language for something much uglier: Henry VIII powers. Powers that allow ministers to change legislation without parliamentary scrutiny, without debate, without any democratic friction. And that means the actual rules — the ones that govern your data, your access, your verification, your wallet, your permissions — will not be written on the floor of the House. They will be written by an unelected civil servant in a closed room, and rubber-stamped by a Secretary of State. The consultation is not democracy. It is the hologram of democracy. Designed to make you feel heard while the law is already coded, the architecture already built, and the enforcement mechanism already chosen. And it gets worse. Because this ban is being routed through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill; a bill that will receive Royal Assent before the consultation even ends. So what exactly are you “consulting” on? A decision that’s already been made. A system that’s already being implemented. A lock that’s already being installed on your front door while they ask you what colour you’d like the handle to be. Then there’s the Unique Identifier for ALL children. They will sell it as “tracking attendance.” But it isn’t an attendance system. It is a digital tether. A permanent state identifier for your child, designed to follow them across systems, databases, services, education, healthcare, “wellbeing,” behavioural monitoring, and digital permissions. And once you combine a Unique Identifier with digital tokens, with “digital wellbeing” regulation, with AI-driven scoring, you have built something monstrous: A system where a child’s “Wellbeing Score” can drop — determined by government-approved metrics, possibly processed by government AI — and the State can remotely revoke their digital tokens. Effectively deleting their social existence until they comply. No access. No platform. No digital participation. No “privileges.” Just compliance. And here’s the part people are missing: They are granting themselves the power to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill without proper parliamentary scrutiny and without waiting for the consultation to end. They are giving the Secretary of State delegated powers to regulate “digital wellbeing” which is a euphemism so broad you could drive an authoritarian regime through it. They can amend laws at any time. They can expand definitions at any time. They can widen the net at any time. Meaning the Prime Minister and Secretaries of State become the architects and the judges. The lawmakers and the enforcers. And Henry VIII powers are named after a tyrant for a reason. Because they were designed for a monarch who forced Parliament to pass laws and accept personal proclamations. That is the lineage of the power Starmer is dressing up as “Fast Tracking.” This isn’t safeguarding. It’s centralisation. And it doesn’t stop there. The other legislation being pulled into this system is the Crime and Policing Bill which is progressing as we speak and the Online Safety Act 2023 — both of which contain mechanisms to expand and amend enforcement without passing fresh primary legislation. Meaning they can tighten the screws without the public ever noticing. No new “big scary bill.” No headline. No national debate. Just silent regulatory expansion. A little more coercion. A little more surveillance. A little more permissioning. Until one day you wake up and the internet — the place you work, learn, communicate, bank, shop, organise, speak, and live — requires you to present a government token just to enter. And you’ll be told it’s normal. You’ll be told it’s safety. You’ll be told it’s “for the children.” This consultation is a farce. The law is being passed. Age verification for all will be forced upon us unless we act now, and unless people stop staring at the headline and start seeing the architecture. This is not even the start of mission creep. This is another step. Another spoke. Another token. Another gate. And yes, there are other ways to improve online safety. Every person over 16 is issued with a National Insurance number. There are privacy-preserving options. There are local-device checks. There are non-centralised approaches. But that is not the point. Because the point is not safety. The point is control. This is part of the digital gulag. The panopticon. A credentialed society where your ability to participate is conditional, permissioned, and revocable... and where the State holds the master key. Linked below is another important post about the Digital ID stack that everyone needs to understand...

Let’s get one thing straight before they gaslight you into swallowing this. This is NOT just about “age verification” so kids can’t scroll TikTok. The under-16s social media ban, and the under-18s VPN ban, is digital verification for everyone; because the only way to enforce it is to make every single person prove their age, prove their identity, and “check in” with the State before accessing the modern internet. And yes… you already know where it leads. OneLogin. A centralised identity system designed to collect your credentials and your biometrics (face, iris, fingerprint) and bind them to a single government account. This ban is not the end goal. It is one verification type. One tiny draconian token. One single piece of the Digital ID puzzle. And the equation remains the same: OneLogin + GOV Wallet = Digital ID. Age verification will become one token on that wallet, but first, before the wallet is fully normalised, before it’s “rolled out” to every citizen through exclusion and coercion, they’ll do what they always do: They’ll introduce the gate first. To access a VPN, a social media site, or even an AI tool, you will be forced to “prove” you are over 16 or 18 — and the proof won’t be a private check, or a local device setting, or a parental control. It will be a government check. A government login. A government permission slip. You will have to “check in” with GOV OneLogin to access the internet like a normal person — and soon enough a token for this will be issued into the GOV Wallet, just like the proposed BritCard token that has now allegedly been “scrapped.” This is the same system, the same architecture, the same rollout pattern... just with a different sticker slapped on the front. And once the token exists, it becomes the default. Once it becomes the default, it becomes the requirement. Once it becomes the requirement, it becomes the leash. Because what they’re building is not an age gate. It’s a permission gate. A surveillance gate. A system where your ability to access platforms, services, information, communication — your ability to exist online — becomes conditional on your compliance with a credential check that is logged, tracked, and centrally controlled. They will see what you do. When you do it. What you search. What you access. What you post. And people will still be saying, with a straight face: “Well, it’s a good thing under-16s are being banned from social media… they’ll be safer.” That’s the bait. Then you hear Starmer say: “How will parents police this alone?” And notice what he’s really saying. He is not empowering parents. He is positioning the government next to parents, granting the State the same “authority” to parent your child, to decide what is healthy, what is harmful, what is permitted, what is “wellbeing,” and what must be restricted. The same government that has lied to you for years about safety. The same government that signs away your rights in the name of protection. The same government that cannot define a woman, cannot secure a border, cannot arrest a p3dophile (rather employs and promotes them), cannot run a hospital — but somehow wants you to believe it can be trusted to police your child’s mind. And if you think this is going through “proper process,” think again. A month ago they announced a consultation on the under-16s ban. That consultation is a red herring. Because Starmer’s little phrase “Fast Track” is just PR language for something much uglier: Henry VIII powers. Powers that allow ministers to change legislation without parliamentary scrutiny, without debate, without any democratic friction. And that means the actual rules — the ones that govern your data, your access, your verification, your wallet, your permissions — will not be written on the floor of the House. They will be written by an unelected civil servant in a closed room, and rubber-stamped by a Secretary of State. The consultation is not democracy. It is the hologram of democracy. Designed to make you feel heard while the law is already coded, the architecture already built, and the enforcement mechanism already chosen. And it gets worse. Because this ban is being routed through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill; a bill that will receive Royal Assent before the consultation even ends. So what exactly are you “consulting” on? A decision that’s already been made. A system that’s already being implemented. A lock that’s already being installed on your front door while they ask you what colour you’d like the handle to be. Then there’s the Unique Identifier for ALL children. They will sell it as “tracking attendance.” But it isn’t an attendance system. It is a digital tether. A permanent state identifier for your child, designed to follow them across systems, databases, services, education, healthcare, “wellbeing,” behavioural monitoring, and digital permissions. And once you combine a Unique Identifier with digital tokens, with “digital wellbeing” regulation, with AI-driven scoring, you have built something monstrous: A system where a child’s “Wellbeing Score” can drop — determined by government-approved metrics, possibly processed by government AI — and the State can remotely revoke their digital tokens. Effectively deleting their social existence until they comply. No access. No platform. No digital participation. No “privileges.” Just compliance. And here’s the part people are missing: They are granting themselves the power to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill without proper parliamentary scrutiny and without waiting for the consultation to end. They are giving the Secretary of State delegated powers to regulate “digital wellbeing” which is a euphemism so broad you could drive an authoritarian regime through it. They can amend laws at any time. They can expand definitions at any time. They can widen the net at any time. Meaning the Prime Minister and Secretaries of State become the architects and the judges. The lawmakers and the enforcers. And Henry VIII powers are named after a tyrant for a reason. Because they were designed for a monarch who forced Parliament to pass laws and accept personal proclamations. That is the lineage of the power Starmer is dressing up as “Fast Tracking.” This isn’t safeguarding. It’s centralisation. And it doesn’t stop there. The other legislation being pulled into this system is the Crime and Policing Bill which is progressing as we speak and the Online Safety Act 2023 — both of which contain mechanisms to expand and amend enforcement without passing fresh primary legislation. Meaning they can tighten the screws without the public ever noticing. No new “big scary bill.” No headline. No national debate. Just silent regulatory expansion. A little more coercion. A little more surveillance. A little more permissioning. Until one day you wake up and the internet — the place you work, learn, communicate, bank, shop, organise, speak, and live — requires you to present a government token just to enter. And you’ll be told it’s normal. You’ll be told it’s safety. You’ll be told it’s “for the children.” This consultation is a farce. The law is being passed. Age verification for all will be forced upon us unless we act now, and unless people stop staring at the headline and start seeing the architecture. This is not even the start of mission creep. This is another step. Another spoke. Another token. Another gate. And yes, there are other ways to improve online safety. Every person over 16 is issued with a National Insurance number. There are privacy-preserving options. There are local-device checks. There are non-centralised approaches. But that is not the point. Because the point is not safety. The point is control. This is part of the digital gulag. The panopticon. A credentialed society where your ability to participate is conditional, permissioned, and revocable... and where the State holds the master key. Linked below is another important post about the Digital ID stack that everyone needs to understand...

Fiona Rose Diamond

401,339 views • 6 months ago

Iran is not defined by a regime which only exists because the CIA installed a Shah who ran a monarchic autocracy which led to the rise of religious fundamentalism and ultimately the Islamic revolution of 1979. Why did the US install him? Because the democratically elected government that ousted him in 1951 nationalised Iranian oil for the benefit of the Iranian people. Iran is NOT defined by the monsters for whom the US created a permissive environment to create a an Islamic terrorist state. The U.S. and British governments did this, NOT the people of Iran. Once we define a nation by the actions of their leaders we create another permissive environment for genocide just as we did in Gaza and now in Lebanon. Iran is a beautiful country steeped in ancient history which has seen them repel invaders time and time again. It’s estimated that just 20% of the population support the regime, yet the US and Israel has deliberately targeted civilian infrastructure. Hundreds of hospitals and schools have been destroyed as well as cultural sites and energy generation facilities. This is NOT a holy war as Trump would have you believe, it’s just another war prosecuted by greedy white men in search of geopolitical power and wealth. Just as it was in 1951 when they actively destroyed democracy to install a dictator, they think they can now deliver new regime change in installing a new monarchic leader in the form of Trump working from home to control Iranian oil. This has NOTHING to do with liberating the Iranian people, Trump is more than happy to deal with a repressive regime as long as they do his bidding and pay a licensing fee to him personally into his Qatari bank account. The problem is, he’s picked on the wrong regime. A regime able to call on centuries of lived experience of invaders. They have no intention of fighting a conventional war, for them it’s about asymmetric warfare. They can instigate attack anywhere in the world to attack American interests. They’ve just chosen not to push that button YET. Trump is out of his league and now desperate for an off-ramp. Iran are more than happy to provide one, but the cost will be crippling both politically and economically. This is the biggest political and military failure in American history. Not because the U.S. military underperformed, they have been outstanding as one would have expected. They’ve carried out their orders to the letter. The question remains however, did they carry out illegal orders? Only time will tell. There is little question that Trump as Commander in Chief, may well find himself accused of war crimes and or crimes against humanity. Once again, time will deliver a verdict on that. Every day the US remains in this war costs billions and Trump’s popularity dips ever further. He’s on political life support already, but it’s the lies that are killing him. He’s up against a smart enemy better at social media than him, who are more than prepared to wait him out, because every day he remains in this quagmire is another nail in his coffin. He’s spent his entire life expecting someone to clean up the mess he leaves behind. That’s why he’s lashing out at allies and threatening to leave NATO. He’s a man in quicksand without a plan and no exit strategy. Even when he has nowhere to turn he can’t help his self enrichment gag reflex kicking in as he considers a ‘joint venture’ with Iran to share the proceeds of tolls on ships navigating the Strait of Hormuz. He’s also embedded Kushner and Witkoff into proceedings to ensure he gets a cut of any reconstruction contracts that might arise as a result of what he’s destroyed. Just as Hitler became delusional in his bunker when it was all over, Trump is facing the same fate. The lies, the twisted narratives, the fantasy that the people believe in him is all part of a cancer that is eating him alive. When he’s gone, if America does not hunt down and jail his enablers, I fear there is no hope and no better tomorrow.

Iran is not defined by a regime which only exists because the CIA installed a Shah who ran a monarchic autocracy which led to the rise of religious fundamentalism and ultimately the Islamic revolution of 1979. Why did the US install him? Because the democratically elected government that ousted him in 1951 nationalised Iranian oil for the benefit of the Iranian people. Iran is NOT defined by the monsters for whom the US created a permissive environment to create a an Islamic terrorist state. The U.S. and British governments did this, NOT the people of Iran. Once we define a nation by the actions of their leaders we create another permissive environment for genocide just as we did in Gaza and now in Lebanon. Iran is a beautiful country steeped in ancient history which has seen them repel invaders time and time again. It’s estimated that just 20% of the population support the regime, yet the US and Israel has deliberately targeted civilian infrastructure. Hundreds of hospitals and schools have been destroyed as well as cultural sites and energy generation facilities. This is NOT a holy war as Trump would have you believe, it’s just another war prosecuted by greedy white men in search of geopolitical power and wealth. Just as it was in 1951 when they actively destroyed democracy to install a dictator, they think they can now deliver new regime change in installing a new monarchic leader in the form of Trump working from home to control Iranian oil. This has NOTHING to do with liberating the Iranian people, Trump is more than happy to deal with a repressive regime as long as they do his bidding and pay a licensing fee to him personally into his Qatari bank account. The problem is, he’s picked on the wrong regime. A regime able to call on centuries of lived experience of invaders. They have no intention of fighting a conventional war, for them it’s about asymmetric warfare. They can instigate attack anywhere in the world to attack American interests. They’ve just chosen not to push that button YET. Trump is out of his league and now desperate for an off-ramp. Iran are more than happy to provide one, but the cost will be crippling both politically and economically. This is the biggest political and military failure in American history. Not because the U.S. military underperformed, they have been outstanding as one would have expected. They’ve carried out their orders to the letter. The question remains however, did they carry out illegal orders? Only time will tell. There is little question that Trump as Commander in Chief, may well find himself accused of war crimes and or crimes against humanity. Once again, time will deliver a verdict on that. Every day the US remains in this war costs billions and Trump’s popularity dips ever further. He’s on political life support already, but it’s the lies that are killing him. He’s up against a smart enemy better at social media than him, who are more than prepared to wait him out, because every day he remains in this quagmire is another nail in his coffin. He’s spent his entire life expecting someone to clean up the mess he leaves behind. That’s why he’s lashing out at allies and threatening to leave NATO. He’s a man in quicksand without a plan and no exit strategy. Even when he has nowhere to turn he can’t help his self enrichment gag reflex kicking in as he considers a ‘joint venture’ with Iran to share the proceeds of tolls on ships navigating the Strait of Hormuz. He’s also embedded Kushner and Witkoff into proceedings to ensure he gets a cut of any reconstruction contracts that might arise as a result of what he’s destroyed. Just as Hitler became delusional in his bunker when it was all over, Trump is facing the same fate. The lies, the twisted narratives, the fantasy that the people believe in him is all part of a cancer that is eating him alive. When he’s gone, if America does not hunt down and jail his enablers, I fear there is no hope and no better tomorrow.

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

21,330 views • 4 months ago

Penny, McMuffin And Tina - Why I Make Happy Doggo Videos If you are reading this I’m sure you’ve watched at least one of the videos I make which feature dogs. Hopefully it put a big smile on your face and left you feeling like a positive difference was being made in the world. I wanted to explain the massive importance of these videos… Taking Old Dogs To The Beach 🌴🥥 This week we did the “Old Dogs Beach Day Out”. It featured the OAP dogs who have been battling serious health issues lately and has close to a million views across different sites. McMuffin - Cancer survivor and had to have an eye removed this week Derek - Very old abandoned dog who was close to death on arrival Lady - Senior girl with 2 broken hips who was dying on the streets Snoop - My own rescue who has numerous tumours and a fused spine It was about as joyous a day out as you can imagine. You could see the dogs enjoying every single second as they swam, sunbathed and ate treats. But what is the point of this? Wouldn’t I be better spending the couple of hours it took doing something else like taking dogs to the vet or feeding even more out on the streets? Good question… Videos Help Me Do The “Boring” Stuff For The Dogs These are some of the things that I do in a typical month… Funding the sterilising of over 100 dogs ✂️ Feeding 20,000 meals for street dogs 🥘 Pay for between 20-40 vet visits for sick dogs 🐶 Purchasing preventative medicines for street dogs 💊 Paying for travel to re-home 7-10 dogs in Thailand ⛴️ Although these things are super important and change lives for the better they aren’t always super interesting. I’ve tried making videos about sterilising or vet visits but most people are not interested after they’ve seen it once. I understand that because I would be the exact same personally watching content on social media. I’d have very limited interest in opening Twitter and seeing dogs getting medical procedures or being abused. Most people simply unfollow or mute that sort of content. People know there is suffering but “out of sight, out of mind” is the attitude on social media. But Don’t Dog Suffering Videos Get Donations? Yes. You’ll probably notice that most content around the world from all types of animal charities can be quite gruesome or sad. This is the same with human tragedies. People are much more likely to donate if they see suffering. The need is more immediate and urgent. I wanted to try something completely different and not share gruesome content. Instead of showing content like Sterilisations (Tina below) or horrific injuries (McMuffin below is already operated on and healing) I wanted to share happy content. I wanted to create content that was so happy and upbeat that people would actually want to share it with others. To tell their friends about the plight of the street dogs and maybe even get excited about changing it too. Penny Is The Perfect Example Penny is a tiny little dog that came into my possession recently. The simple facts of her story are horrific… Kept locked up in a tiny box under a house Tortured by a human Broken leg so bad it needed large scale surgery I have videos on my phone of her before the rescue that would leave you sick to your stomach. I couldn’t sleep the night I saw them. I don’t want people to see all that though and instead focus on the positives… She is safe and alive She was able to go on a huge journey to a wonderful foundation called Soi Dog who worked on saving her leg. She is so cute that I’ve had over 100 people message me about giving her a forever home It costs a lot of money, time and effort to change Penny’s life. I’d say about 20 people have been involved. I try to keep the content around her positive and uplifting and focus on her turnaround and the people helping to change her life. Subtly I can educate around where she came from and the need to change that but people don’t want to see a video of her getting tortured. Ultimately like many of the dogs she is a story of hope and the innate goodness in the people who helped change her life. The Subtle Benefits Of Feeling Good When I started the videos I remember looking at social media and it was so depressing. Every post was about war in Ukraine, people arguing about politics, the cost of living crisis or Covid (2022). I suffer from depression and anxiety and I found that social media was just making it worse for me. I thought “Maybe there is room in there for something super positive about dogs”. Thats what I am trying to create. It is also worth remembering some huge added bonuses about the videos… They make the dogs feel good They make people watching feel good They make people around the world aware of street dogs They make myself and others feel good in person doing something practical on the ground as our days can be pretty tough at times. I’d imagine Jumbo forgot about his painful legs when we took him to 7-11 this week and Lady couldn’t believe her luck after such a horrific recent past on the streets. There are probably faster ways to save more dogs. Probably more efficient ways to use my time. I think about that all the time. I’m just trying to fix the problem of dog suffering globally and come at it from a whole new angle. Maybe I’m right and maybe I’m wrong but there is no perfect simple solution to this. I want to share the individual dog stories as every life maters. I want to highlight amazing organisations like Soi Dog and individuals like Sybille who need as much coverage as possible. I want people to look at their phones around the world and think “that makes me feel so happy and wholesome and real change is possible”. I want people who are down and suffering themselves to think “maybe there is some hope for me”. McMuffin, Penny and Tina are just a couple of dogs we all know and love but they will also help thousands of future dogs indirectly. They are the little dogs who will help the other voiceless ones. Have a lovely weekend everybody wherever you are Big Love Niall P.S You can always support by either donating here Or you can now hit Subscribe here on Twitter for a monthly donation which is brand new

Niall Harbison

217,663 views • 3 years ago

Everybody needs a digital ID, say heads of state and high-tech leaders. They give many reasons: it will stop illegal migration; it will increase efficiency; it will protect privacy; and it will prevent online fraud and data ransoming. But we don’t need digital IDs for any of those things. The US just stopped illegal migration without digital IDs. Our online activities are more efficient than ever and it’s hard to see how they could get more efficient without sacrificing privacy and safety. And centralizing data through digital IDs, which could link social media, vaccine, and banking information, in ways that allow government control, would undermine cybersecurity because having separate log-ins for our financial, health, shopping, banking, credit card, and other data makes sure that if one is hacked they aren’t all hacked. “All your information in one place is a hacker’s dream,” said an Oxford University IT expert. “We already have countless ways we can provide our identity – passports, driving licences, and so on.” Many Americans likely think that digital IDs are only something people in Britain have to worry about. Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week declared that every working person there must have digital ID, or “BritCard”. The U.S. should never allow such a thing. A digital ID that linked our social media, vaccine records, and bank accounts could allow governments to censor and control the population, violating our free speech and privacy rights. Those Americans should think again. We are rapidly moving to the exact same digital ID surveillance and control system as the British. Real IDs contain embedded microchips that bring us one step closer to digital IDs. State governors are pushing it. Gavin Newsom last year allowed drivers licenses onto Apple and Google wallets. This “mobile drivers license,” or mDL, is a digital ID, and one more link in the chain. And it is Americans, including Bill Gates and the controlling owner of Oracle, Larry Ellison, who are financing the digital ID push. “ The NHS [National Health Service] in the UK has an incredible amount of population data, but it’s fragmented,” he told Blair in February of this year. “It’s not easily accessible by these AI models. We have to take all of this data we have in our country and move it into a single, if you will, unified data platform… The secret is to get all of that data in one place.” In September, Ellison made clear that he viewed the power of data centralization in behavior change. “Citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re constantly watching and recording everything that’s going on.” Ellison’s Oracle is an AI database cloud computing company and he is its best salesman. Ellison, the second richest man in the world, and owner of CBS and CNN, has “donated or pledged at least £257m to the Tony Blair Institute,” reportedthe New Statesman last week. “Ellison donations have helped it grow to more than 900 staff, working in at least 45 countries.” The nightmare scenario for mass, constant spying on citizens is not theoretical. China in 2019 created a social credit system with rewards that include better employment, school admissions, and shorter wait times in hospitals, and punishments including denial of access to public services and social events, denial of train and air tickets, and public shaming. One study found that at least one-third of total “offenses” were not actually against the law and thus expanded “local government authority into moral and social domains beyond the law,” found researchers. UK’s Big Brother Watched recently warned that a digital ID system, even if initially limited, could be a gateway to more invasive government surveillance and intrusion. Why would any liberal and democratic Western government like Britain want such a thing? Money is no doubt a big part of it. Oracle and other high tech companies stand to make billions taking bits of our money here and there for every transaction. Governments like Keir Starmer’s also seem eager to give them billions in contracts to monitor and analyze the population. We found no evidence Starmer would personally benefit financially from digital IDs, however, and as a political leader, he must consider whether his actions are popular, and digital IDs are not. A YouGov poll released yesterday found UK opinion toward digital IDs was 42 percent in favor and 45 percent against. And given the negative reaction to them online, popular opposition will likely rise. Tony Blair Institute’s (TBI) polling may have misled Starmer. TBI’s first question primed people to think about how inconvenienced they’ve felt without a digital ID, a blatantly manipulative form of polling. No honest pollster seeking to give a client a realistic understanding of how the public thought about digital IDs would have started with that question, because they know the importance of framing. The second question was equally biased. “Some are suggesting the government should introduce a new app, allowing instant access to a range of public services.” The framing suggests awareness on the part of the pollster that the public had a negative view of “digital ID,” hence the use of the “app” euphemism. The third question was “Do you think there is digital technology that could help tackle these issues... Processing asylum seekers and managing the UK’s borders.” One reason to think Starmer relied on the TBI’s biased polling is that Starmer pitched the digital ID as necessary to stop mass migration. “I know working people are worried about the level of illegal migration into this country,” said Starmer. “Digital ID… will make it tougher to work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure.” The notion is absurd. Nations have maintained borders for hundreds of years without the need for digital IDs. Given how badly the Starmer government’s digital ID roll out appears to have backfired, why did Starmer and Blair push it? One possibility is that they really believe in the mission of improving people’s lives. That is already how they justify it. Said Starmer, “it will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to prove your identity to access key services swiftly - rather than hunting around for an old utility bill.” But it is hard to believe Starmer and Blair really viewed the difficulty of finding where you left your utility bill as a high-priority social problem. It appears more likely that they are hiding their reasons and that the real motivation is the same as the Chinese government: to control the population. Gates last year released a Netflix documentary calling for sweeping AI-powered censorship of people he disagrees with on vaccines and other issues. The Starmer government’s digital IDs should be a wake-up call to all of us. For years, various people have been raising concerns about digital IDs but free speech and privacy advocates have clearly not done enough to stop them. That needs to change. The good news is that the backlash to the digital IDs appears strong and growing. And anyone can see that, when they spoke, Blair was taking instructions from Ellison. “You can pipe this data from these three thousand separate data sources into a single unified database,” said Ellison, “and that’s what we need to do.” The episode should wake us Americans up to the continuing threat of total surveillance and censorship. Powerful American high-tech elites see dollar signs in controlling our data — and our behavior. As such, this episode has motivated my colleagues and me to do more on this issue, including making grants to people doing investigative reporting, research, documentary filmmaking, policy development and policy advocacy on digital IDs. Please email info@civilizationworks.org to get involved, and consider making a tax-deductible donation. And if you’re not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support our award-winning investigative journalism, which is essential to revealing the truth about censorship and digital IDs.

Everybody needs a digital ID, say heads of state and high-tech leaders. They give many reasons: it will stop illegal migration; it will increase efficiency; it will protect privacy; and it will prevent online fraud and data ransoming. But we don’t need digital IDs for any of those things. The US just stopped illegal migration without digital IDs. Our online activities are more efficient than ever and it’s hard to see how they could get more efficient without sacrificing privacy and safety. And centralizing data through digital IDs, which could link social media, vaccine, and banking information, in ways that allow government control, would undermine cybersecurity because having separate log-ins for our financial, health, shopping, banking, credit card, and other data makes sure that if one is hacked they aren’t all hacked. “All your information in one place is a hacker’s dream,” said an Oxford University IT expert. “We already have countless ways we can provide our identity – passports, driving licences, and so on.” Many Americans likely think that digital IDs are only something people in Britain have to worry about. Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week declared that every working person there must have digital ID, or “BritCard”. The U.S. should never allow such a thing. A digital ID that linked our social media, vaccine records, and bank accounts could allow governments to censor and control the population, violating our free speech and privacy rights. Those Americans should think again. We are rapidly moving to the exact same digital ID surveillance and control system as the British. Real IDs contain embedded microchips that bring us one step closer to digital IDs. State governors are pushing it. Gavin Newsom last year allowed drivers licenses onto Apple and Google wallets. This “mobile drivers license,” or mDL, is a digital ID, and one more link in the chain. And it is Americans, including Bill Gates and the controlling owner of Oracle, Larry Ellison, who are financing the digital ID push. “ The NHS [National Health Service] in the UK has an incredible amount of population data, but it’s fragmented,” he told Blair in February of this year. “It’s not easily accessible by these AI models. We have to take all of this data we have in our country and move it into a single, if you will, unified data platform… The secret is to get all of that data in one place.” In September, Ellison made clear that he viewed the power of data centralization in behavior change. “Citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re constantly watching and recording everything that’s going on.” Ellison’s Oracle is an AI database cloud computing company and he is its best salesman. Ellison, the second richest man in the world, and owner of CBS and CNN, has “donated or pledged at least £257m to the Tony Blair Institute,” reportedthe New Statesman last week. “Ellison donations have helped it grow to more than 900 staff, working in at least 45 countries.” The nightmare scenario for mass, constant spying on citizens is not theoretical. China in 2019 created a social credit system with rewards that include better employment, school admissions, and shorter wait times in hospitals, and punishments including denial of access to public services and social events, denial of train and air tickets, and public shaming. One study found that at least one-third of total “offenses” were not actually against the law and thus expanded “local government authority into moral and social domains beyond the law,” found researchers. UK’s Big Brother Watched recently warned that a digital ID system, even if initially limited, could be a gateway to more invasive government surveillance and intrusion. Why would any liberal and democratic Western government like Britain want such a thing? Money is no doubt a big part of it. Oracle and other high tech companies stand to make billions taking bits of our money here and there for every transaction. Governments like Keir Starmer’s also seem eager to give them billions in contracts to monitor and analyze the population. We found no evidence Starmer would personally benefit financially from digital IDs, however, and as a political leader, he must consider whether his actions are popular, and digital IDs are not. A YouGov poll released yesterday found UK opinion toward digital IDs was 42 percent in favor and 45 percent against. And given the negative reaction to them online, popular opposition will likely rise. Tony Blair Institute’s (TBI) polling may have misled Starmer. TBI’s first question primed people to think about how inconvenienced they’ve felt without a digital ID, a blatantly manipulative form of polling. No honest pollster seeking to give a client a realistic understanding of how the public thought about digital IDs would have started with that question, because they know the importance of framing. The second question was equally biased. “Some are suggesting the government should introduce a new app, allowing instant access to a range of public services.” The framing suggests awareness on the part of the pollster that the public had a negative view of “digital ID,” hence the use of the “app” euphemism. The third question was “Do you think there is digital technology that could help tackle these issues... Processing asylum seekers and managing the UK’s borders.” One reason to think Starmer relied on the TBI’s biased polling is that Starmer pitched the digital ID as necessary to stop mass migration. “I know working people are worried about the level of illegal migration into this country,” said Starmer. “Digital ID… will make it tougher to work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure.” The notion is absurd. Nations have maintained borders for hundreds of years without the need for digital IDs. Given how badly the Starmer government’s digital ID roll out appears to have backfired, why did Starmer and Blair push it? One possibility is that they really believe in the mission of improving people’s lives. That is already how they justify it. Said Starmer, “it will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to prove your identity to access key services swiftly - rather than hunting around for an old utility bill.” But it is hard to believe Starmer and Blair really viewed the difficulty of finding where you left your utility bill as a high-priority social problem. It appears more likely that they are hiding their reasons and that the real motivation is the same as the Chinese government: to control the population. Gates last year released a Netflix documentary calling for sweeping AI-powered censorship of people he disagrees with on vaccines and other issues. The Starmer government’s digital IDs should be a wake-up call to all of us. For years, various people have been raising concerns about digital IDs but free speech and privacy advocates have clearly not done enough to stop them. That needs to change. The good news is that the backlash to the digital IDs appears strong and growing. And anyone can see that, when they spoke, Blair was taking instructions from Ellison. “You can pipe this data from these three thousand separate data sources into a single unified database,” said Ellison, “and that’s what we need to do.” The episode should wake us Americans up to the continuing threat of total surveillance and censorship. Powerful American high-tech elites see dollar signs in controlling our data — and our behavior. As such, this episode has motivated my colleagues and me to do more on this issue, including making grants to people doing investigative reporting, research, documentary filmmaking, policy development and policy advocacy on digital IDs. Please email [email protected] to get involved, and consider making a tax-deductible donation. And if you’re not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support our award-winning investigative journalism, which is essential to revealing the truth about censorship and digital IDs.

Michael Shellenberger

1,354,765 views • 11 months ago