正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Ryan also described cases where patients remained on chemotherapy for extended periods without eliminating their cancer. In one example, a patient underwent chemotherapy for two years! The treatment kept the cancer “at bay,” meaning it did not progress, but it also did not resolve. During that time, they experienced...

VigilantFox's profile picture

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,972,805 subscribers

16,245 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Ryan Richardson is hearing directly from people who were diagnosed with cancer and told they were running out of time. He said he’s receiving testimonials at a rate of “five a week” from individuals who were told they had only “a month to live,” and later reported being “completely free” of cancer. He attributes the reversal to what he calls the “Richardson protocol.” It’s not a single intervention or one isolated treatment. It’s a combined approach that typically includes: • B17 (also known as amygdalin, commonly sourced from apricot seeds) • High intake of vitamin C • Enzyme supplements intended to support digestion and metabolism • Changes to diet, often emphasizing whole foods and reducing processed foods • General lifestyle adjustments like hydration and nutrition support Ryan emphasized that these elements are used together rather than individually. The people reaching out to him to share their experiences aren’t describing theories. They’re describing exactly what happened to them after being diagnosed with cancer and following the Richardson protocol.
2:02

Ryan Richardson is hearing directly from people who were diagnosed with cancer and told they were running out of time. He said he’s receiving testimonials at a rate of “five a week” from individuals who were told they had only “a month to live,” and later reported being “completely free” of cancer. He attributes the reversal to what he calls the “Richardson protocol.” It’s not a single intervention or one isolated treatment. It’s a combined approach that typically includes: • B17 (also known as amygdalin, commonly sourced from apricot seeds) • High intake of vitamin C • Enzyme supplements intended to support digestion and metabolism • Changes to diet, often emphasizing whole foods and reducing processed foods • General lifestyle adjustments like hydration and nutrition support Ryan emphasized that these elements are used together rather than individually. The people reaching out to him to share their experiences aren’t describing theories. They’re describing exactly what happened to them after being diagnosed with cancer and following the Richardson protocol.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

24,547 次观看 • 4 个月前

Top Doctor Exposes the Sobering Truth About Chemotherapy Dr. Paul Marik has shed light on the grim reality of chemotherapy’s ineffectiveness in treating cancer. He revealed that only “about 5% of all cancers are actually curable with chemotherapy.” For the other 95%, chemo is “palliative at best,” he said. The truly sobering detail that Dr. Marik mentioned was that despite advancements in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgical treatments over the past 30 years, the overall life expectancy of a cancer patient has been extended by a measly 3.9 months. Dr. Marik urges cancer patients to ask their oncologists a vital question: “Is this [chemotherapy] going to cure my cancer, or is it just going to palliate and extend my life a month or two with terrible side effects?” “Hopefully, they’ll be honest,” he added.
4:26

Top Doctor Exposes the Sobering Truth About Chemotherapy Dr. Paul Marik has shed light on the grim reality of chemotherapy’s ineffectiveness in treating cancer. He revealed that only “about 5% of all cancers are actually curable with chemotherapy.” For the other 95%, chemo is “palliative at best,” he said. The truly sobering detail that Dr. Marik mentioned was that despite advancements in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgical treatments over the past 30 years, the overall life expectancy of a cancer patient has been extended by a measly 3.9 months. Dr. Marik urges cancer patients to ask their oncologists a vital question: “Is this [chemotherapy] going to cure my cancer, or is it just going to palliate and extend my life a month or two with terrible side effects?” “Hopefully, they’ll be honest,” he added.

Barbara Oneill

109,921 次观看 • 2 年前

Top Doctor Exposes the Sobering Truth About Chemotherapy Dr. Paul Marik has shed light on the grim reality of chemotherapy’s ineffectiveness in treating cancer. He revealed that only “about 5% of all cancers are actually curable with chemotherapy.” For the other 95%, chemo is “palliative at best,” he said. The truly sobering detail that Dr. Marik mentioned was that despite advancements in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgical treatments over the past 30 years, the overall life expectancy of a cancer patient has been extended by a measly 3.9 months. Dr. Marik urges cancer patients to ask their oncologists a vital question: “Is this [chemotherapy] going to cure my cancer, or is it just going to palliate and extend my life a month or two with terrible side effects?” “Hopefully, they’ll be honest,” he added.
4:26

Top Doctor Exposes the Sobering Truth About Chemotherapy Dr. Paul Marik has shed light on the grim reality of chemotherapy’s ineffectiveness in treating cancer. He revealed that only “about 5% of all cancers are actually curable with chemotherapy.” For the other 95%, chemo is “palliative at best,” he said. The truly sobering detail that Dr. Marik mentioned was that despite advancements in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgical treatments over the past 30 years, the overall life expectancy of a cancer patient has been extended by a measly 3.9 months. Dr. Marik urges cancer patients to ask their oncologists a vital question: “Is this [chemotherapy] going to cure my cancer, or is it just going to palliate and extend my life a month or two with terrible side effects?” “Hopefully, they’ll be honest,” he added.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

464,904 次观看 • 2 年前

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.
0:21

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.

TheLiverDoc™

269,527 次观看 • 2 年前

The Remarkable Cancer-Fighting Benefits of Ivermectin • “Ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells,” which are often resistant to chemotherapy. • “It can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to chemotherapy,” making treatments more effective. • “It makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well. And so it’s a radiosensitizer.” • Patients are seeing “tumors shrinking down to almost nothing, liver metastases disappearing, [and] brain metastases disappearing.” “There are over 100 papers on the success of ivermectin and cancer,” but much of this research has been ignored because the drug is off-patent, meaning “no one’s going to make money on it.” Dr. Makis has treated over 1,000 patients using combinations of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and other therapies. Many of his patients, told by their doctors that there was “nothing they can do for them,” are now “cancer-free” or have their “cancer under control.” The success stories are undeniable, and the hope is spreading. MakisMD
4:13

The Remarkable Cancer-Fighting Benefits of Ivermectin • “Ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells,” which are often resistant to chemotherapy. • “It can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to chemotherapy,” making treatments more effective. • “It makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well. And so it’s a radiosensitizer.” • Patients are seeing “tumors shrinking down to almost nothing, liver metastases disappearing, [and] brain metastases disappearing.” “There are over 100 papers on the success of ivermectin and cancer,” but much of this research has been ignored because the drug is off-patent, meaning “no one’s going to make money on it.” Dr. Makis has treated over 1,000 patients using combinations of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and other therapies. Many of his patients, told by their doctors that there was “nothing they can do for them,” are now “cancer-free” or have their “cancer under control.” The success stories are undeniable, and the hope is spreading. MakisMD

skymeds store | Online Ivermectin Pharmacy

5,142,525 次观看 • 1 年前

What if Biden's accelerated physical and cognitive decline was in part a result of hormonal treatment for prostate cancer? DR. JAMIN BRAHMBATT, ON CNN: "One of the biggest side effects that I see in my patients that get these hormone treatments could be cognitive changes. So you have to kind of balance that people can also get issues with fatigue and weight loss. But when he has stuff in his bones, he's also at higher risk for fractures. So it is it is a very sensitive conversation."
1:17

What if Biden's accelerated physical and cognitive decline was in part a result of hormonal treatment for prostate cancer? DR. JAMIN BRAHMBATT, ON CNN: "One of the biggest side effects that I see in my patients that get these hormone treatments could be cognitive changes. So you have to kind of balance that people can also get issues with fatigue and weight loss. But when he has stuff in his bones, he's also at higher risk for fractures. So it is it is a very sensitive conversation."

Jorge Bonilla

460,164 次观看 • 1 年前

Thank you Dyson Cancer Centre and RUH Bath 🏥 for all you do to provide cancer patients with the very best care. Today The Queen spent time with patients and families to hear about their ongoing treatment and the support they have received. 🏥 The Queen also met NHS staff, volunteers and clinicians at the centre to learn about their use of innovative technology. The new Dyson Cancer Centre, which opened in April, provides a nurturing and therapeutic environment. The centre also features a Macmillan Cancer Support Wellbeing Hub. ❤️‍🩹 Wishing the very best to all those continuing cancer treatment on their path to recovery.
0:32

Thank you Dyson Cancer Centre and RUH Bath 🏥 for all you do to provide cancer patients with the very best care. Today The Queen spent time with patients and families to hear about their ongoing treatment and the support they have received. 🏥 The Queen also met NHS staff, volunteers and clinicians at the centre to learn about their use of innovative technology. The new Dyson Cancer Centre, which opened in April, provides a nurturing and therapeutic environment. The centre also features a Macmillan Cancer Support Wellbeing Hub. ❤️‍🩹 Wishing the very best to all those continuing cancer treatment on their path to recovery.

The Royal Family

156,261 次观看 • 2 年前

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”
2:43

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”

Wall Street Apes

339,878 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 GAZA HEALTH CRISIS: THOUSANDS OF CANCER PATIENTS WITHOUT ACCESS TO CARE • Around 10,000 cancer patients in Gaza • Nearly 3,500 women diagnosed with breast cancer • Thousands of new cases emerging during the war Haneen Shamieh, a mother of four in her thirties, was diagnosed with breast cancer during the war and has been unable to access proper treatment due to severe medication shortages and the collapse of medical services. She warns that continued delays may lead to a mastectomy and is urgently appealing for permission to travel abroad for life-saving treatment. Gaza’s healthcare system is rapidly deteriorating, leaving patients with life-threatening conditions without access to care.
2:00

🚨 GAZA HEALTH CRISIS: THOUSANDS OF CANCER PATIENTS WITHOUT ACCESS TO CARE • Around 10,000 cancer patients in Gaza • Nearly 3,500 women diagnosed with breast cancer • Thousands of new cases emerging during the war Haneen Shamieh, a mother of four in her thirties, was diagnosed with breast cancer during the war and has been unable to access proper treatment due to severe medication shortages and the collapse of medical services. She warns that continued delays may lead to a mastectomy and is urgently appealing for permission to travel abroad for life-saving treatment. Gaza’s healthcare system is rapidly deteriorating, leaving patients with life-threatening conditions without access to care.

Gaza Notifications

11,383 次观看 • 3 个月前

The system is rigged against the immune system, destroying the very cells you need to fight cancer. "We've been doing it wrong". Patrick Soon-Shiong says Chemotherapy and Radiation "Wipe out" the only cells that matter for protecting your body against cancer. "Antkiva" (AKA Bioshield) is an IL-15 based treatment that the NIH designated as the most important molecule to fight cancer, and tried to develop it for 10 years but did nothing with it. They prioritised chemotherapy as standard of care.
0:29

The system is rigged against the immune system, destroying the very cells you need to fight cancer. "We've been doing it wrong". Patrick Soon-Shiong says Chemotherapy and Radiation "Wipe out" the only cells that matter for protecting your body against cancer. "Antkiva" (AKA Bioshield) is an IL-15 based treatment that the NIH designated as the most important molecule to fight cancer, and tried to develop it for 10 years but did nothing with it. They prioritised chemotherapy as standard of care.

Humanspective

77,482 次观看 • 9 个月前

.drpaulmarik told me they’re compiling a list of the best prophylactic protocols to prevent cancer: “The first most effective is green tea…because of its effect on cancer cells, but also the tumor microenvironment. …Then we have curcumin, which acts on multiple biological pathways. We then have vitamin D…There’s a very strong association between vitamin D deficiency and cancer. And then number four is omega three fatty acids. …Our basic protocol—we call it root four—are these four drugs. …They’re reasonably cheap, there are no side effects. So I think people over the age of 60, even if you're healthy, should consider taking these drugs, because it will significantly reduce your risk of developing cancer. Obviously, it won't completely eliminate it, but think how cost-effective this is, because we know the cost of treating a patient with cancer with conventional chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors runs into the millions of dollars, let alone the lost time. …So it's a highly cost-effective approach, and you would imagine that it would be an approach that public health would be interested in. …We should be preventing diabetes, obesity, and cancer." Independent Medical Alliance
2:40

.drpaulmarik told me they’re compiling a list of the best prophylactic protocols to prevent cancer: “The first most effective is green tea…because of its effect on cancer cells, but also the tumor microenvironment. …Then we have curcumin, which acts on multiple biological pathways. We then have vitamin D…There’s a very strong association between vitamin D deficiency and cancer. And then number four is omega three fatty acids. …Our basic protocol—we call it root four—are these four drugs. …They’re reasonably cheap, there are no side effects. So I think people over the age of 60, even if you're healthy, should consider taking these drugs, because it will significantly reduce your risk of developing cancer. Obviously, it won't completely eliminate it, but think how cost-effective this is, because we know the cost of treating a patient with cancer with conventional chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors runs into the millions of dollars, let alone the lost time. …So it's a highly cost-effective approach, and you would imagine that it would be an approach that public health would be interested in. …We should be preventing diabetes, obesity, and cancer." Independent Medical Alliance

Jan Jekielek

102,234 次观看 • 1 年前

We don’t know exactly what cancer Elle Macpherson had - and we have no right to that knowledge. She described it as INTRADUCTAL She is not a doctor Some people think that’s DCIS - ductal carcinoma in situ or Stage 0. It can’t spread and you would NEVER be offered chemo for it. I think she means IDC or invasive ductal cancer that can spread and is treated with chemotherapy to reduce the risk of recurrence.
0:58

We don’t know exactly what cancer Elle Macpherson had - and we have no right to that knowledge. She described it as INTRADUCTAL She is not a doctor Some people think that’s DCIS - ductal carcinoma in situ or Stage 0. It can’t spread and you would NEVER be offered chemo for it. I think she means IDC or invasive ductal cancer that can spread and is treated with chemotherapy to reduce the risk of recurrence.

Dr Liz O'Riordan

25,514 次观看 • 2 年前

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.
0:59

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.

Joe Tippens

47,858 次观看 • 6 个月前

"Chemotherapy Is A Hoax & A Scam Perpetuated By Big Pharma To Make Money At The Expense Of People Who Suffer." Dr Paul Marik, MD "Chemotherapy Doesn't Save Lives, It Reduces Life....But It Generates Billions Of Dollars." "Chemotherapy Causes Metastasis, It Spreads Cancer." "Chemotherapy Prolongs Life 2-3 Months, That's The Sum Benefit." "For some Cancers, such as gastric cancer, chemotherapy actually reduces life expectancy." "It also activates cancer stem cells. Chemotherapy is the worst thing possible that you would want." "These chemotherapy drugs cost patients over $100,000 a year & 50-60% of patients with cancer face financial ruin because of the cost of their medication." Cancer is not genetic. Cancer is mitochondrial dysfunction. Metabolic Ketogenic Therapy & a targeted protocol including Ivermectin, Mebendazole, Fenbendazole, Methylene Blue & a host of other proven cancer killers is an effective 1st line therapy for the treatment of cancer. Why Is Chemotherapy So Toxic? Chemotherapy came from one of the Cruelest Weapons ever invented...Mustard Gas. In 1925, The geneva Protocol banned Mustard Gas use as a weapon of war, citing it's deadly harm as a chemical weapon. But, researchers found it destroyed bone marrow & lymphatic tissue to market as a profitable drug. The 1st chemotherapy was Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride (HN2), Nitrogen Mustard. Today, five Nitrogen Mustards are commonly used in cancer therapy, including Mechlorethamine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Melphalan & Chlorambucil. Chemotherapy kills every cell in its path which is why administering it requires protective gear. It wipes out crucial NK T-Cells which is our bodies only natural defense by releasing Cytokines & killing infected cells. When Chemotherapy & Radiation take out our final defense in NK T-Cells, we are left without a working immune system & further damage & Cancer ensues. Cancer Can Be Prevented & Treated Using The Hybrid Cancer Protocol Linked Below: which is a 7 pronged protocol using a Ketogenic Low Carb, seed oil free, sugar free diet. Fasting, exercise, vitamins like D, Zinc & Magnesium. And Methylene Blue, Ivermectin & Fenbendazole. 👇Dr Marik & Dr Kory: Ivermectin For Cancer👇 👇Dr Marik et al: Hybrid Cancer Treatment Protocol👇 👇Dr Marik: Metabolic Cancer Treatment Book👇 Speaker: drpaulmarik Video: WR
1:26

"Chemotherapy Is A Hoax & A Scam Perpetuated By Big Pharma To Make Money At The Expense Of People Who Suffer." Dr Paul Marik, MD "Chemotherapy Doesn't Save Lives, It Reduces Life....But It Generates Billions Of Dollars." "Chemotherapy Causes Metastasis, It Spreads Cancer." "Chemotherapy Prolongs Life 2-3 Months, That's The Sum Benefit." "For some Cancers, such as gastric cancer, chemotherapy actually reduces life expectancy." "It also activates cancer stem cells. Chemotherapy is the worst thing possible that you would want." "These chemotherapy drugs cost patients over $100,000 a year & 50-60% of patients with cancer face financial ruin because of the cost of their medication." Cancer is not genetic. Cancer is mitochondrial dysfunction. Metabolic Ketogenic Therapy & a targeted protocol including Ivermectin, Mebendazole, Fenbendazole, Methylene Blue & a host of other proven cancer killers is an effective 1st line therapy for the treatment of cancer. Why Is Chemotherapy So Toxic? Chemotherapy came from one of the Cruelest Weapons ever invented...Mustard Gas. In 1925, The geneva Protocol banned Mustard Gas use as a weapon of war, citing it's deadly harm as a chemical weapon. But, researchers found it destroyed bone marrow & lymphatic tissue to market as a profitable drug. The 1st chemotherapy was Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride (HN2), Nitrogen Mustard. Today, five Nitrogen Mustards are commonly used in cancer therapy, including Mechlorethamine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Melphalan & Chlorambucil. Chemotherapy kills every cell in its path which is why administering it requires protective gear. It wipes out crucial NK T-Cells which is our bodies only natural defense by releasing Cytokines & killing infected cells. When Chemotherapy & Radiation take out our final defense in NK T-Cells, we are left without a working immune system & further damage & Cancer ensues. Cancer Can Be Prevented & Treated Using The Hybrid Cancer Protocol Linked Below: which is a 7 pronged protocol using a Ketogenic Low Carb, seed oil free, sugar free diet. Fasting, exercise, vitamins like D, Zinc & Magnesium. And Methylene Blue, Ivermectin & Fenbendazole. 👇Dr Marik & Dr Kory: Ivermectin For Cancer👇 👇Dr Marik et al: Hybrid Cancer Treatment Protocol👇 👇Dr Marik: Metabolic Cancer Treatment Book👇 Speaker: drpaulmarik Video: WR

Valerie Anne Smith

146,895 次观看 • 1 年前

Medical pioneer Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong unveils a paradigm-shifting approach to cancer treatment that could save millions of lives. In an interview, he revealed we already have the key: protecting the immune system FIRST. The current standard of care—chemotherapy and radiation—often destroys a patient’s lymphocytes (NK & T cells), leading to a condition called lymphopenia. For decades, over 300 studies have shown that lymphopenia predicts early mortality, not just in cancer, but in sepsis and trauma. We treat anemia, but we’ve NEVER had an approved treatment for this critical immune deficiency. Until now. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s “Bio-Shield” is that breakthrough. It’s already approved, and the results are profound: Prostate cancer patients treated with the Bio-Shield before radiation achieved complete remission while their lymphocytes were protected. An ovarian cancer patient received the full, brutal course of chemo after the Bio-Shield. Her cancer disappeared, and she proceeded to surgery with a protected immune system. The vision is simple, yet revolutionary: Mandate that ANY patient undergoing radiation or chemotherapy first receives the Bio-Shield to protect their immune system. The treatment isn’t just attacking the cancer; it’s fortifying the body’s own innate ability to fight and survive. The call to action is clear. We don't need to wait for new regulatory hurdles. We need immediate education for doctors and patients across the nation. We have the power to turn the tide. This is the future of medicine: treating the patient's immune system as the most valuable asset in the fight for their life.
2:53

Medical pioneer Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong unveils a paradigm-shifting approach to cancer treatment that could save millions of lives. In an interview, he revealed we already have the key: protecting the immune system FIRST. The current standard of care—chemotherapy and radiation—often destroys a patient’s lymphocytes (NK & T cells), leading to a condition called lymphopenia. For decades, over 300 studies have shown that lymphopenia predicts early mortality, not just in cancer, but in sepsis and trauma. We treat anemia, but we’ve NEVER had an approved treatment for this critical immune deficiency. Until now. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s “Bio-Shield” is that breakthrough. It’s already approved, and the results are profound: Prostate cancer patients treated with the Bio-Shield before radiation achieved complete remission while their lymphocytes were protected. An ovarian cancer patient received the full, brutal course of chemo after the Bio-Shield. Her cancer disappeared, and she proceeded to surgery with a protected immune system. The vision is simple, yet revolutionary: Mandate that ANY patient undergoing radiation or chemotherapy first receives the Bio-Shield to protect their immune system. The treatment isn’t just attacking the cancer; it’s fortifying the body’s own innate ability to fight and survive. The call to action is clear. We don't need to wait for new regulatory hurdles. We need immediate education for doctors and patients across the nation. We have the power to turn the tide. This is the future of medicine: treating the patient's immune system as the most valuable asset in the fight for their life.

Camus

38,936 次观看 • 11 个月前

"Chemotherapy Is A Hoax & A Scam Perpetuated By Big Pharma To Make Money At The Expense Of People Who Suffer." Dr Paul Marik, MD "Chemotherapy Doesn't Save Lives, But It Generates Billions Of Dollars." "Chemotherapy Causes Metastasis, It Spreads Cancer." "Chemotherapy Prolongs Life 2-3 Months, That's The Sum Benefit." "For some Cancers, such as gastric cancer, chemotherapy actually reduces life expectancy." "It also activates cancer stem cells. Chemotherapy is the worst thing possible that you would want." "These chemotherapy drugs cost patients over $100,000 a year & 50-60% of patients with cancer face financial ruin because of the cost of their medication." Cancer is not genetic. Cancer is mitochondrial dysfunction. Metabolic Ketogenic Therapy & a targeted protocol including Ivermectin, Mebendazole, Fenbendazole, Methylene Blue & a host of other proven cancer killers is an effective 1st line therapy for the treatment of cancer. Why Is Chemotherapy So Toxic? Chemotherapy came from one of the Cruelest Weapons ever invented...Mustard Gas. In 1925, The geneva Protocol banned Mustard Gas use as a weapon of war, citing it's deadly harm as a chemical weapon. But, researchers found it destroyed bone marrow & lymphatic tissue to market as a profitable drug. The 1st chemotherapy was Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride (HN2), Nitrogen Mustard. Today, five Nitrogen Mustards are commonly used in cancer therapy, including Mechlorethamine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Melphalan & Chlorambucil. Chemotherapy kills every cell in its path which is why administering it requires protective gear. It wipes out crucial NK T-Cells which is our bodies only natural defense by releasing Cytokines & killing infected cells. When Chemotherapy & Radiation take out our final defense in NK T-Cells, we are left without a working immune system & further damage & Cancer ensues. Cancer Can Be Prevented & Treated Using The Hybrid Cancer Protocol Linked Below: which is a 7 pronged protocol using a Ketogenic Low Carb, seed oil free, sugar free diet. Fasting, exercise, vitamins like D, Zinc & Magnesium. And Methylene Blue, Ivermectin & Fenbendazole. 👇Dr Marik & Dr Kory: Ivermectin For Cancer👇 👇Dr Marik et al: Hybrid Cancer Treatment Protocol👇 👇Dr Marik: Metabolic Cancer Treatment Book👇 Speaker: drpaulmarik Video: Wellness Radar
1:30

"Chemotherapy Is A Hoax & A Scam Perpetuated By Big Pharma To Make Money At The Expense Of People Who Suffer." Dr Paul Marik, MD "Chemotherapy Doesn't Save Lives, But It Generates Billions Of Dollars." "Chemotherapy Causes Metastasis, It Spreads Cancer." "Chemotherapy Prolongs Life 2-3 Months, That's The Sum Benefit." "For some Cancers, such as gastric cancer, chemotherapy actually reduces life expectancy." "It also activates cancer stem cells. Chemotherapy is the worst thing possible that you would want." "These chemotherapy drugs cost patients over $100,000 a year & 50-60% of patients with cancer face financial ruin because of the cost of their medication." Cancer is not genetic. Cancer is mitochondrial dysfunction. Metabolic Ketogenic Therapy & a targeted protocol including Ivermectin, Mebendazole, Fenbendazole, Methylene Blue & a host of other proven cancer killers is an effective 1st line therapy for the treatment of cancer. Why Is Chemotherapy So Toxic? Chemotherapy came from one of the Cruelest Weapons ever invented...Mustard Gas. In 1925, The geneva Protocol banned Mustard Gas use as a weapon of war, citing it's deadly harm as a chemical weapon. But, researchers found it destroyed bone marrow & lymphatic tissue to market as a profitable drug. The 1st chemotherapy was Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride (HN2), Nitrogen Mustard. Today, five Nitrogen Mustards are commonly used in cancer therapy, including Mechlorethamine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Melphalan & Chlorambucil. Chemotherapy kills every cell in its path which is why administering it requires protective gear. It wipes out crucial NK T-Cells which is our bodies only natural defense by releasing Cytokines & killing infected cells. When Chemotherapy & Radiation take out our final defense in NK T-Cells, we are left without a working immune system & further damage & Cancer ensues. Cancer Can Be Prevented & Treated Using The Hybrid Cancer Protocol Linked Below: which is a 7 pronged protocol using a Ketogenic Low Carb, seed oil free, sugar free diet. Fasting, exercise, vitamins like D, Zinc & Magnesium. And Methylene Blue, Ivermectin & Fenbendazole. 👇Dr Marik & Dr Kory: Ivermectin For Cancer👇 👇Dr Marik et al: Hybrid Cancer Treatment Protocol👇 👇Dr Marik: Metabolic Cancer Treatment Book👇 Speaker: drpaulmarik Video: Wellness Radar

Valerie Anne Smith

1,007,213 次观看 • 1 年前

Fenbendazole & Cancer Remission: The Peer-Reviewed Cases Challenging Modern Oncology A peer-reviewed medical publication has delivered a bombshell that the mainstream oncology world cannot ignore. It documents three cases of patients with advanced, metastatic cancer who achieved remarkable remissions after a radical course of action: self-medicating with veterinary-grade medication. The paper details three individuals who were essentially out of conventional options: ➡️ Case 1: An 83-year-old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had spread to her liver, lungs, and bones. After refusing chemotherapy and entering hospice care, she began a regimen of fenbendazole (a dewormer for dogs), Vitamin D, and multivitamins. By June 2022, her cancer was in complete remission. She has been cancer-free for over three years. ➡️ Case 2: A man with stage 4 prostate cancer and extensive bone metastases. While on standard hormone therapy, he added high-dose fenbendazole and a cocktail of supplements (Vitamin K2, magnesium, melatonin, curcumin). The result? Within 26 months, his cancer growth and spread had completely halted. ➡️ Case 3: A man in his 60s with advanced melanoma, slated for immunotherapy. While waiting for treatment, he began the same fenbendazole and vitamin protocol. By February 2024, before even starting the planned drug, his cancer had completely disappeared. The Critical Nuance Everyone Must Understand: The authors of this paper are NOT advocating for patients to self-medicate with veterinary drugs. The purpose of publishing these cases is precisely the opposite: to sound an alarm. When patients in desperate situations feel compelled to turn to clandestine, unapproved treatments, it is a clear sign that current options are failing them. This paper uses these dramatic "success stories" as a powerful call to action for the scientific community to launch proper clinical trials. The central question is no longer just if cancer metabolism can be targeted, but how we can safely and effectively harness these pathways. The combination of a repurposed drug with foundational lifestyle and nutritional support (the common denominator in all three cases) presents a compelling, albeit unorthodox, avenue for research. This is where the conversation about medical freedom, patient desperation, and scientific rigor collides. It underscores an urgent need to explore all promising pathways, especially those that are patient-driven, with the rigor they deserve. What are your thoughts on the role of repurposed drugs in modern oncology?
9:55

Fenbendazole & Cancer Remission: The Peer-Reviewed Cases Challenging Modern Oncology A peer-reviewed medical publication has delivered a bombshell that the mainstream oncology world cannot ignore. It documents three cases of patients with advanced, metastatic cancer who achieved remarkable remissions after a radical course of action: self-medicating with veterinary-grade medication. The paper details three individuals who were essentially out of conventional options: ➡️ Case 1: An 83-year-old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had spread to her liver, lungs, and bones. After refusing chemotherapy and entering hospice care, she began a regimen of fenbendazole (a dewormer for dogs), Vitamin D, and multivitamins. By June 2022, her cancer was in complete remission. She has been cancer-free for over three years. ➡️ Case 2: A man with stage 4 prostate cancer and extensive bone metastases. While on standard hormone therapy, he added high-dose fenbendazole and a cocktail of supplements (Vitamin K2, magnesium, melatonin, curcumin). The result? Within 26 months, his cancer growth and spread had completely halted. ➡️ Case 3: A man in his 60s with advanced melanoma, slated for immunotherapy. While waiting for treatment, he began the same fenbendazole and vitamin protocol. By February 2024, before even starting the planned drug, his cancer had completely disappeared. The Critical Nuance Everyone Must Understand: The authors of this paper are NOT advocating for patients to self-medicate with veterinary drugs. The purpose of publishing these cases is precisely the opposite: to sound an alarm. When patients in desperate situations feel compelled to turn to clandestine, unapproved treatments, it is a clear sign that current options are failing them. This paper uses these dramatic "success stories" as a powerful call to action for the scientific community to launch proper clinical trials. The central question is no longer just if cancer metabolism can be targeted, but how we can safely and effectively harness these pathways. The combination of a repurposed drug with foundational lifestyle and nutritional support (the common denominator in all three cases) presents a compelling, albeit unorthodox, avenue for research. This is where the conversation about medical freedom, patient desperation, and scientific rigor collides. It underscores an urgent need to explore all promising pathways, especially those that are patient-driven, with the rigor they deserve. What are your thoughts on the role of repurposed drugs in modern oncology?

Camus

50,224 次观看 • 9 个月前