Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Ryan Clark makes his case for why Derrick Henry shouldn't take away from Lamar Jackson's MVP candidacy. #RavensFlock via ESPN
56,864 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 11

@espn *cough cough* THEY WERE THE NUMBER ONE RUSHING TEAM IN THE NFL LAST SEASON DERICK HENRY CHANGED NOTHING

@espn The fact that Lamar did these numbers even with Henry in the backfield is actually insane. Not to mention like three new linemen at the start.

Louisville Cardinals Shirt of the Month Get officially-licensed Louisville Cardinals T-shirts, long-sleeves & hoodies monthly

@espn He absolutely right about that

@espn People did not watch Henry the last two years. He was washed. Every back who plays with Lamar excels. Because the Lamar threat opens rush lanes.

@espn Won’t acknowledge Allen’s evolution; Allen’s numbers nearly there with Lamar’s despite 15 quarters not played and a substantially worse supporting case…where the goalposts tomorrow ravens fans??!

@espn And tomorrow he’ll say something totally different 🤷🏾♀️. Our Ravens just need to ignore the noise and go win it all.

@espn If anything Henry benefited from Lamar

@espn first time ive seen ryan clark make a logical take

@espn We get it . That’s ya man . But you act like having a goat running back doesnt make life easier for the quarterback . So defenses dont have to respect the play action . So defense dont have to have to make tactics to deal with a 1000 yard rushing qb and 2k back running read opt

@espn Also fair to point out that in prior seasons they've consistently led the league in rushing with replacement level talent at RB. Henry is the best of the LJ era but it's not as though he revolutionized Lamar's game.



