Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

S19 7x07 - 3: Long caption incoming... Danielle had been asking for Mason to come back since season 1, and when they got the cancellation news, this was her first ask. They shot the scenes 15-16 times because they shot it like a play and not individual acts/takes. They...

S19Firetrucks's profile picture

Station 19 🚒

1,416 subscribers

12,233 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.
0:35

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Kristine (@schachin on Threads) 🇺🇦

23,566 views • 6 months ago

In Goodfellas, when Joes Pesci's character Tommy shoots Spider, some of the actors wore earplugs to protect themselves from the gunfire. But Pesci refused - he wanted to hear the full blast of the gun, to immerse himself in the moment. He explains... “It was very hard for me to get as close to killing someone as possible in that scene, because it wasn't a contract killing, and it wasn't somebody that had to be…(it was) a kid. And some of the actors, even Bob (Robert De Niro) - they put earplugs in. But I wanted this feeling, this deafening feeling - I wanted to feel that gun ride and feel like it. And the kid that played Spider (Michael Imperioli) threw himself back so violently at the first shot that he went flying against the bar and cut his hand. They had to take him to the hospital. He cut it on a pitcher that fell. I think everybody in that room, including me, felt like I killed that kid.” Quote comes from the commentary track off the Goodfellas Blu-ray
1:46

In Goodfellas, when Joes Pesci's character Tommy shoots Spider, some of the actors wore earplugs to protect themselves from the gunfire. But Pesci refused - he wanted to hear the full blast of the gun, to immerse himself in the moment. He explains... “It was very hard for me to get as close to killing someone as possible in that scene, because it wasn't a contract killing, and it wasn't somebody that had to be…(it was) a kid. And some of the actors, even Bob (Robert De Niro) - they put earplugs in. But I wanted this feeling, this deafening feeling - I wanted to feel that gun ride and feel like it. And the kid that played Spider (Michael Imperioli) threw himself back so violently at the first shot that he went flying against the bar and cut his hand. They had to take him to the hospital. He cut it on a pitcher that fell. I think everybody in that room, including me, felt like I killed that kid.” Quote comes from the commentary track off the Goodfellas Blu-ray

Gangster Cinema Central

98,680 views • 2 months ago

John Carpenter on how the studio, audience and critics reacted after watching "Big Trouble in Little China" (1986) & the reason for movie's failure: "Carpenter: I thought about writing a book about my experiences in Hollywood being a director, mainly because I was burned out on making movies. But | didn't do it because | thought, “I’m not ready yet. | don't have enough to say yet. I need to make more films and | don’t want to quit yet.” Interviewer: How did Fox executives react when they saw the movie for the first time? Carpenter: Needless to say, they had a few problems with the movie. They sat down with me and we went through the film. They didn’t like that the white hero was such a buffoon, and that he was being shown up by the Asians. They were afraid the audience wouldn't think this guy was brave, so they asked me to cut out the humor and emphasize his bravery, which was impossible to do. Then we got to the preview stage. The audience that saw it really loved it and laughed, so they wanted me to put the humor back in and go back to what it was—they still hated the movie, though. They didn't want Kurt to play it plenty. They wanted him to be an action hero, a real live action hero, not Jack Burton. They wanted him to be more like Rambo or Stallone. They wanted him to play it straight and it wasn't straight. Interviewer: How was the movie perceived by the audience and the critics? Carpenter: Nobody got it. Like I said earlier, timing was never my thing in terms of when my movies come out. This movie was completely and totally misunderstood. The critics and the public thought it was just bad, and there is nothing | can do about that." ("John Carpenter - The Prince of Darkness", Gilles Boulenger, 2001) P.S: On this day, 40 years ago, "Big Trouble in Little China" (1986) was released in the USA.
2:03

John Carpenter on how the studio, audience and critics reacted after watching "Big Trouble in Little China" (1986) & the reason for movie's failure: "Carpenter: I thought about writing a book about my experiences in Hollywood being a director, mainly because I was burned out on making movies. But | didn't do it because | thought, “I’m not ready yet. | don't have enough to say yet. I need to make more films and | don’t want to quit yet.” Interviewer: How did Fox executives react when they saw the movie for the first time? Carpenter: Needless to say, they had a few problems with the movie. They sat down with me and we went through the film. They didn’t like that the white hero was such a buffoon, and that he was being shown up by the Asians. They were afraid the audience wouldn't think this guy was brave, so they asked me to cut out the humor and emphasize his bravery, which was impossible to do. Then we got to the preview stage. The audience that saw it really loved it and laughed, so they wanted me to put the humor back in and go back to what it was—they still hated the movie, though. They didn't want Kurt to play it plenty. They wanted him to be an action hero, a real live action hero, not Jack Burton. They wanted him to be more like Rambo or Stallone. They wanted him to play it straight and it wasn't straight. Interviewer: How was the movie perceived by the audience and the critics? Carpenter: Nobody got it. Like I said earlier, timing was never my thing in terms of when my movies come out. This movie was completely and totally misunderstood. The critics and the public thought it was just bad, and there is nothing | can do about that." ("John Carpenter - The Prince of Darkness", Gilles Boulenger, 2001) P.S: On this day, 40 years ago, "Big Trouble in Little China" (1986) was released in the USA.

DepressedBergman

102,002 views • 1 month ago

FUN FACT. In the early test for Bring It On, audiences wanted more of the Clovers. To address this, they added Clover scenes to the trailer for the film to make it seem like they were in more of the film than they actually were.
2:05

FUN FACT. In the early test for Bring It On, audiences wanted more of the Clovers. To address this, they added Clover scenes to the trailer for the film to make it seem like they were in more of the film than they actually were.

bobbi loves vampires ❤️

4,466,495 views • 3 years ago

the fact that the first thing they went to do the moment they got back to their hotel is get on live and spend some more time with stays says so much about them. you can tell how they value the time they get with stays as much as stays do with them, and because today was cut short they had to make up for it😭
0:20

the fact that the first thing they went to do the moment they got back to their hotel is get on live and spend some more time with stays says so much about them. you can tell how they value the time they get with stays as much as stays do with them, and because today was cut short they had to make up for it😭

ཐི⋆hamida⋆ཋྀ

32,109 views • 1 year ago

1703. 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 A man sat in a room and wrote a pamphlet mocking the government. It was so sharp, so clever, both sides believed it was real. When they found out who wrote it, they arrested him. His name was Daniel Defoe. They sentenced him to the pillory. Three days. Three public squares. Your head and hands locked in wood. You couldn’t move. You couldn’t hide. The crowd threw whatever they wanted. Some people died in it. On the first day, the crowd came. Defoe was locked in. He waited for the stones. They threw flowers. They drank to his health. They bought copies of his pamphlet. Right there, in front of the authorities. He served all three days. All three crowds did the same thing. He went home. And kept writing. He wrote Robinson Crusoe. The pillory was abolished in 1837. The people decided it was beneath them. A country that once locked a man in wood for writing the truth… Tore it down because the people said so. Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧
1:17

1703. 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 A man sat in a room and wrote a pamphlet mocking the government. It was so sharp, so clever, both sides believed it was real. When they found out who wrote it, they arrested him. His name was Daniel Defoe. They sentenced him to the pillory. Three days. Three public squares. Your head and hands locked in wood. You couldn’t move. You couldn’t hide. The crowd threw whatever they wanted. Some people died in it. On the first day, the crowd came. Defoe was locked in. He waited for the stones. They threw flowers. They drank to his health. They bought copies of his pamphlet. Right there, in front of the authorities. He served all three days. All three crowds did the same thing. He went home. And kept writing. He wrote Robinson Crusoe. The pillory was abolished in 1837. The people decided it was beneath them. A country that once locked a man in wood for writing the truth… Tore it down because the people said so. Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

136,332 views • 5 months ago

Jayson Tatum on his message of gratitude to the team yesterday: “It was one, just being vulnerable, showing my appreciation to the team, of how they have played this season, how they motivated me every single day. The joy and competitive nature that they displayed, I wanted to be a part of that. And I say it all the time, going through rehab and being injured is lonely. It's not intentional. I couldn't practice for a while, I couldn't be in the game. When they were on the court, I was in the weight room, having to do my own thing. So you feel isolated, in a sense. “But I just expressed that being around as much as possible, going to games, being on the plane, really made me feel like I was still very much a part of the team, and how thankful to the group for just being themselves. I was thankful to the coaches that extended their days a lot by helping me during rehab and on the court and pick-up games [for] my conditioning. So I really just kind of telling everybody in the room that they all played a part in essentially helping me get to this moment.”
1:30

Jayson Tatum on his message of gratitude to the team yesterday: “It was one, just being vulnerable, showing my appreciation to the team, of how they have played this season, how they motivated me every single day. The joy and competitive nature that they displayed, I wanted to be a part of that. And I say it all the time, going through rehab and being injured is lonely. It's not intentional. I couldn't practice for a while, I couldn't be in the game. When they were on the court, I was in the weight room, having to do my own thing. So you feel isolated, in a sense. “But I just expressed that being around as much as possible, going to games, being on the plane, really made me feel like I was still very much a part of the team, and how thankful to the group for just being themselves. I was thankful to the coaches that extended their days a lot by helping me during rehab and on the court and pick-up games [for] my conditioning. So I really just kind of telling everybody in the room that they all played a part in essentially helping me get to this moment.”

Noa Dalzell 🏀

2,779,577 views • 5 months ago

🔋 "Mason and Bruno - I think they were pushing to play against Leeds, the decision was that they weren't quite ready - they've trained, so they should be back in the squad..." It looks as though Darren Fletcher will have two big injury boosts for the trip to Burnley. #MUFC
0:36

🔋 "Mason and Bruno - I think they were pushing to play against Leeds, the decision was that they weren't quite ready - they've trained, so they should be back in the squad..." It looks as though Darren Fletcher will have two big injury boosts for the trip to Burnley. #MUFC

Stretford Paddock

71,472 views • 7 months ago

> full story on how wumuti invited each member to be a part of xlov: – hyun was considering giving up on being an idol because they'd been hurt too many times after training for 7 years and not debuting, so when wumuti told them about the group they needed time to think about it. they later accepted it and even signed the contract without saying anything, encouraging wumuti to not give up on xlov – haru went to see wumuti at their fanmeeting in Japan because they missed them, and when wumuti invited them they just said yes right away even though they didn't understand the full thing because their korean wasn't good yet – rui was the last one to be invited because the both of them were really close, and wumuti didn't want to give them false hope. they were also getting opportunities at other companies and muti was worried they'd turn it down for a project that could maybe not even come out of the woodwork. when everything was settled, they apologized to rui for telling them last, but said the concept fit them the best and that they deserved a group that valued their beauty.
9:29

> full story on how wumuti invited each member to be a part of xlov: – hyun was considering giving up on being an idol because they'd been hurt too many times after training for 7 years and not debuting, so when wumuti told them about the group they needed time to think about it. they later accepted it and even signed the contract without saying anything, encouraging wumuti to not give up on xlov – haru went to see wumuti at their fanmeeting in Japan because they missed them, and when wumuti invited them they just said yes right away even though they didn't understand the full thing because their korean wasn't good yet – rui was the last one to be invited because the both of them were really close, and wumuti didn't want to give them false hope. they were also getting opportunities at other companies and muti was worried they'd turn it down for a project that could maybe not even come out of the woodwork. when everything was settled, they apologized to rui for telling them last, but said the concept fit them the best and that they deserved a group that valued their beauty.

xlov archive ✦

165,908 views • 2 months ago

Breaking 🔴 Nothing against #SalmanKhan ⛔ Now, actor Sonu Mishra who was supposed to play Salman Khan ’s character in #KalaHiran exit the movie ⚠️ He left the movie after he came to know the intention of the makers. While talking to the media, Mishra said, "I was so much excited because I was supposed to play the role of superstar Salman Khan. I had also started the shooting of the film. But when the intent is negative, being an actor, I don't want to be a part of such a film. No doubt that they have a point of view. But you are showing superstar Salman Khan in a negative way and showing a one-sided narrative." He added, "I left because I had not signed the agreement. We shot for two days, and I asked them for the agreement and script because they were making a one-sided narrative story against a superstar. So, they understood I was not going to fall into their trap. I asked for the agreement to know what all clauses are there in it. After a long time, they showed me things, and it was revealed that I had to speak negatively against the star in the media. So, all these things were against my ethics."
2:02

Breaking 🔴 Nothing against #SalmanKhan ⛔ Now, actor Sonu Mishra who was supposed to play Salman Khan ’s character in #KalaHiran exit the movie ⚠️ He left the movie after he came to know the intention of the makers. While talking to the media, Mishra said, "I was so much excited because I was supposed to play the role of superstar Salman Khan. I had also started the shooting of the film. But when the intent is negative, being an actor, I don't want to be a part of such a film. No doubt that they have a point of view. But you are showing superstar Salman Khan in a negative way and showing a one-sided narrative." He added, "I left because I had not signed the agreement. We shot for two days, and I asked them for the agreement and script because they were making a one-sided narrative story against a superstar. So, they understood I was not going to fall into their trap. I asked for the agreement to know what all clauses are there in it. After a long time, they showed me things, and it was revealed that I had to speak negatively against the star in the media. So, all these things were against my ethics."

Always Bollywood

81,058 views • 2 months ago

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.
3:03

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 views • 2 months ago

“We got a message from the Iranian side that one of the ships, which presumably was closest to our borders at that point of time, wanted to come into our port. On the 1st March, we said you can come in and it took them a few days to sail in and then they docked in Kochi. There were a lot of young cadets and they disembarked. So for us, when this ship wanted to come in and that too in difficulties, I think it was the humane thing to do. We were guided by that principle. In a sense of the other ships, one obviously had a similar situation in Sri Lanka and they took the decision that they did, and one unfortunately didn’t make it.” * ⁠EAM Dr. S. Jaishankar made it clear that there were two Iranian vessels. One docked safely in Kochi, while the other moved towards Sri Lanka. The vessel that remained under India’s watch stayed completely safe and secure.
1:59

“We got a message from the Iranian side that one of the ships, which presumably was closest to our borders at that point of time, wanted to come into our port. On the 1st March, we said you can come in and it took them a few days to sail in and then they docked in Kochi. There were a lot of young cadets and they disembarked. So for us, when this ship wanted to come in and that too in difficulties, I think it was the humane thing to do. We were guided by that principle. In a sense of the other ships, one obviously had a similar situation in Sri Lanka and they took the decision that they did, and one unfortunately didn’t make it.” * ⁠EAM Dr. S. Jaishankar made it clear that there were two Iranian vessels. One docked safely in Kochi, while the other moved towards Sri Lanka. The vessel that remained under India’s watch stayed completely safe and secure.

BJP

40,930 views • 5 months ago

This woman was excited for her new appliances. She ordered a new washer and dryer, and a stove to be delivered right away from Lowe’s. She also purchased a new fridge to be delivered in a month because she had to modify the cabinet for fitment. Come delivery day, she was at work, and her son was home for the delivery. He didn’t know what was coming and in what order, he was only there to let the in. Not only did they deliver the fridge that wasn’t supposed to be there until a month later, they dented it in many spots. They forgot to deliver the stove and the dryer altogether. The washer was never hooked up, in fact the snapped off the water connectors in the back too. So now they have to go to the garage for food and they can’t wash their cloths. If this was you, what would make this right for you?
1:45

This woman was excited for her new appliances. She ordered a new washer and dryer, and a stove to be delivered right away from Lowe’s. She also purchased a new fridge to be delivered in a month because she had to modify the cabinet for fitment. Come delivery day, she was at work, and her son was home for the delivery. He didn’t know what was coming and in what order, he was only there to let the in. Not only did they deliver the fridge that wasn’t supposed to be there until a month later, they dented it in many spots. They forgot to deliver the stove and the dryer altogether. The washer was never hooked up, in fact the snapped off the water connectors in the back too. So now they have to go to the garage for food and they can’t wash their cloths. If this was you, what would make this right for you?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

5,009,629 views • 6 months ago

Behind the Scenes - Independence Day ID4 turns 30 today. One of the first scenes they shot was the White House explosion, so it could be in the trailer, and they only had one chance to nail it. ID4 still holds the record for the most miniature FX shots in a single film.
1:45

Behind the Scenes - Independence Day ID4 turns 30 today. One of the first scenes they shot was the White House explosion, so it could be in the trailer, and they only had one chance to nail it. ID4 still holds the record for the most miniature FX shots in a single film.

The Sting

33,422 views • 1 month ago

#WATCH | Chennai, Tamil Nadu | On being asked about her weight in a press conference, Actress Gouri G Kishan says, "My co-actor was asked, 'We see you picking her up in some romance sequences, how was her weight like'. The second question to the director was that it was a miscasting because the hero is so tall, and I am out of shape or short... He (journalist asking the question) then defended it for a long time... For some people in the presser, women are just there, they should not have an opinion..." (07.11)
2:17

#WATCH | Chennai, Tamil Nadu | On being asked about her weight in a press conference, Actress Gouri G Kishan says, "My co-actor was asked, 'We see you picking her up in some romance sequences, how was her weight like'. The second question to the director was that it was a miscasting because the hero is so tall, and I am out of shape or short... He (journalist asking the question) then defended it for a long time... For some people in the presser, women are just there, they should not have an opinion..." (07.11)

ANI

613,907 views • 9 months ago

Francis Ngannou says he'd been asking the PFL for a fight for the past year and shares the details behind his departure: "I was hoping to have a fight since last year. I've been asking a fight, and they kept telling me they are working on it. We parted ways in January... I wanted to give them a better way to come up with something because that was their decision to part ways, not mine. I was a little surprised when they made the announcement. I didn't know they were coming out with that. I found it a little weird."
2:02

Francis Ngannou says he'd been asking the PFL for a fight for the past year and shares the details behind his departure: "I was hoping to have a fight since last year. I've been asking a fight, and they kept telling me they are working on it. We parted ways in January... I wanted to give them a better way to come up with something because that was their decision to part ways, not mine. I was a little surprised when they made the announcement. I didn't know they were coming out with that. I found it a little weird."

Ariel Helwani

198,731 views • 4 months ago

According to Roy Scheider, "Filming 'Sorcerer' (1977) made 'Jaws' (1975) look like a picnic". He considered the Bridge scene to be the most dangerous he has ever acted in. The scene was so real that he said, "What the audience will see on that screen is what really happened." Building the bridge cost about a million dollars. It took 3 months to complete. Friedkin called it "A mad enterprise and definitely life threatening". The bridge was built on what they considered to be a "perfect river" in Dominican Republic. It was 12 feet deep. However, there were weeks without rainfall and the level of the river started dropping. The river has never went dry before according to the locals. When the bridge was completed, the river had only 1 feet of water making it impossible to film the scene there. With only 2 scenes left to film, the crew had to leave for Mexico to shoot the bridge scene. So they decided to shoot the scene in a river in an Aztec village in a remote location in Mexico. The Bridge had to be reassembled and anchored in the new location. The shutdown of production had lasted a month which was a huge expense to the management. When the crew arrived at the village, there was a huge exodus of the local population. When Friedkin enquired, he was informed by one of the authorities that it was because of word of William Friedkin's arrival. They were a deeply religious people, and when they heard the man who made "The Exorcist" (1973) was coming to their village: they felt it was "bad karma". But few of the locals stayed and helped with the filming. Before arriving, Friedkin was informed that it rained often in the area, but didn't know that it was only in the summer season. Since it was the fall, there was no rain and the river began to drop at the rate of six inches or more a day. The water was diverted to the location of the bridge in the river using large pipes and pumping equipment. Since Friedkin wanted to shoot the scene in the rain, they brought in half a dozen large sprinklers that drew water from upriver. The scene runs twelve minutes, roughly 10 percent of the final cut, but it took months to complete and cost more than $3 million, most of it not budgeted. ("The Friedkin Connection: A Memoir", William Friedkin, 2013 & Roy Scheider's interview to the The New York Times, 1977) P.S: On this day, 49 years ago, "Sorcerer" (1977) was released in the USA.
2:14

According to Roy Scheider, "Filming 'Sorcerer' (1977) made 'Jaws' (1975) look like a picnic". He considered the Bridge scene to be the most dangerous he has ever acted in. The scene was so real that he said, "What the audience will see on that screen is what really happened." Building the bridge cost about a million dollars. It took 3 months to complete. Friedkin called it "A mad enterprise and definitely life threatening". The bridge was built on what they considered to be a "perfect river" in Dominican Republic. It was 12 feet deep. However, there were weeks without rainfall and the level of the river started dropping. The river has never went dry before according to the locals. When the bridge was completed, the river had only 1 feet of water making it impossible to film the scene there. With only 2 scenes left to film, the crew had to leave for Mexico to shoot the bridge scene. So they decided to shoot the scene in a river in an Aztec village in a remote location in Mexico. The Bridge had to be reassembled and anchored in the new location. The shutdown of production had lasted a month which was a huge expense to the management. When the crew arrived at the village, there was a huge exodus of the local population. When Friedkin enquired, he was informed by one of the authorities that it was because of word of William Friedkin's arrival. They were a deeply religious people, and when they heard the man who made "The Exorcist" (1973) was coming to their village: they felt it was "bad karma". But few of the locals stayed and helped with the filming. Before arriving, Friedkin was informed that it rained often in the area, but didn't know that it was only in the summer season. Since it was the fall, there was no rain and the river began to drop at the rate of six inches or more a day. The water was diverted to the location of the bridge in the river using large pipes and pumping equipment. Since Friedkin wanted to shoot the scene in the rain, they brought in half a dozen large sprinklers that drew water from upriver. The scene runs twelve minutes, roughly 10 percent of the final cut, but it took months to complete and cost more than $3 million, most of it not budgeted. ("The Friedkin Connection: A Memoir", William Friedkin, 2013 & Roy Scheider's interview to the The New York Times, 1977) P.S: On this day, 49 years ago, "Sorcerer" (1977) was released in the USA.

DepressedBergman

76,740 views • 1 month ago

Police knocked on the wrong door in the middle of the night at the Mississippi home of Ismael Lopez. When he opened the door, his dog ran out. They shot and killed it. He was holding a rifle. They told him to put it down. He turned around to put it down and they shot him in the back of the head and killed him. The officer was not prosecuted. And today a Mississippi jury rejected his wife's civil suit, stating that they did not feel the officer used "excessive force."
2:01

Police knocked on the wrong door in the middle of the night at the Mississippi home of Ismael Lopez. When he opened the door, his dog ran out. They shot and killed it. He was holding a rifle. They told him to put it down. He turned around to put it down and they shot him in the back of the head and killed him. The officer was not prosecuted. And today a Mississippi jury rejected his wife's civil suit, stating that they did not feel the officer used "excessive force."

Rebekah Jones

1,775,706 views • 2 years ago

After this man spent over $300 at his local store. When he was leaving the store they asked to see his receipt, he declined. So they detained him and called the police. The police came and took his cart away from him and was pushing it back to the store. After they were going to arrest him for not leaving, he finally, finally shows the receipt and they let him take his stuff he bought. Usually if they ask to see it and you refuse, it’s not a huge deal. But in this instance he had many high priced items not in bags, you can see just the boxes in the cart. Maybe put a sign at the door that you will be checked if items over a certain dollar amount isn’t in a bag, would that be reasonable?
3:18

After this man spent over $300 at his local store. When he was leaving the store they asked to see his receipt, he declined. So they detained him and called the police. The police came and took his cart away from him and was pushing it back to the store. After they were going to arrest him for not leaving, he finally, finally shows the receipt and they let him take his stuff he bought. Usually if they ask to see it and you refuse, it’s not a huge deal. But in this instance he had many high priced items not in bags, you can see just the boxes in the cart. Maybe put a sign at the door that you will be checked if items over a certain dollar amount isn’t in a bag, would that be reasonable?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

2,762,593 views • 6 months ago