Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Sachin Tendulkar vs Glenn McGrath: 6, 4, 4, 4 🔥 And some “½ stat experts” still cry that Sachin struggled against McGrath 🤡 No proper ball-by-ball data existed before 2002 but that won’t stop agenda peddlers from manufacturing narratives. Even Grok will agree on this

112,513 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The 3D data from FIFA's cameras around the stadium seem to contradict FIFA's official statement that the ball never made contact with the camera cable in Norway vs England. FIFA has 16 dedicated high resolution optical cameras positioned around every World Cup stadium to capture player and ball movements throughout the match. They use these to create the precise 3D renderings of gameplay which are used in-game for things like offsides graphics and then also used by broadcasters to create programming visuals. In this rendering, you can see the ball "hitch" in the air at the moment it supposedly contacted the cable. Now that by itself is interesting, but the part that really convinces me is the behavior of the English player that comes up to play the ball. This is especially clear in the second wide-angle shot. Watch his angle on the ball. Watch what angle he takes before the ball hitches in the air and then after. He clearly has to adjust his angle to play the ball...and suspiciously, that adjustment happens right after it takes that hitch and appears to change trajectory. To me, this is fairly compelling evidence that the ball hit the cable. This brings up a very interesting point though...this comes from FIFA's data. They would have had access to this in their analysis of the event. Which begs the question...why would they release some statement claiming no evidence of the ball contacting the cable existed when their own data seems to suggest that it did? Just adds to the mounting list of procedural questions that have really overshadowed the actual gameplay of this World Cup.

Mark Valorian

149,375 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sad to see Vinod Kambli in such a bad state. He was incredibly talented but fell from the top into oblivion by his own behaviour. But we still don't blame him and empathize with him (and that's ok); some even see a villain in Sachin for his suffering. Here's the psychology behind it : 1. The Fall from Grace Effect : People are drawn to dramatic stories of rise and fall. Seeing someone who was once on top suffer humanizes them, making their pain relatable. 2. Redemption Narrative : Many believe in second chances and feel that suffering is a form of punishment that balances past wrongs. Sympathy aligns with the idea of redemption. 3. Underdog bias : We root for those who are down and out, especially if they’ve hit rock bottom after being admired. We've seen movies, we've read stories—rock bottom is an interval, not the end. As per our expectations, there should be redemption after rock bottom; here, it’s none. 4. Admiration Legacy : Past fame create lingering admiration. We separate the person’s past success from their downfall, blaming circumstances rather than the individual entirely. 5. Subtle hate for successful and rich: Tendulkar achieved everything. If you see him in isolation, you'll probably admire his career. But when seen along with Kambli's life, especially when media narratives suggest Tendulkar was his best friend and could have done much for him, some will see Tendulkar as a bad person. Such stories sell.

THE SKIN DOCTOR

185,534 просмотров • 1 год назад