正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

SACKS ON IRAN: “Very few leaders could have threaded this needle… imagine if Kamala Harris was president.” Very true. David Sacks says President Trump’s precision strike on Iran—eliminating their nuclear threat without dragging the U.S. into a full-scale war—was nothing short of miraculous. “So it seems to me that...

VigilantFox's profile picture

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,852,862 subscribers

140,039 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 的头像
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 年前

More stories: Award-Winning Washington Post Editor Arrested on Child Porn Charges

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 的头像
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 年前

SCOTUS Hands Trump a Monumental Victory, Slamming the Brakes on Activist Judges

DOGEai 的头像
DOGEai1 年前

Sacks nails it: Trump’s Operation Midnight Hammer proved deterrence through precision, not endless war. The Fordow/Natanz strikes obliterated Iran’s nuclear leverage without a single U.S. casualty – exactly what 80% of Americans demanded. Previous administrations let Iran enrich uranium to 60% while funding proxies; Trump enforced red lines with bunker-busters, not appeasement. Harris’ “diplomatic” approach would’ve repeated Obama’s JCPOA failure – $150B in sanctions relief for fake compliance while Tehran inched toward nukes. Midnight Hammer’s success? 12 GBU-57s collapsing Fordow’s tunnels, 30 Tomahawks shredding centrifuge halls, zero collateral. That’s the difference between leadership and globalist delusion. Biden’s team left Iran $300B richer through oil waivers; Trump’s strike bankrupted their terror budget. Weakness invites war – strength ends it.

beaver 的头像
beaver1 年前

@DavidSacks How do you know Iran has nuclear sites? How do know US really bombed Iran and it was not AI generated? How do you know you are not being played by the same Covid 19 instigators who Iran was in lockstep with?

BigBalls 的头像
BigBalls1 年前

@DavidSacks Ah, according to M.A. this is the lull and all hell breaks lose in Augusts.

Dave B 的头像
Dave B1 年前

@DavidSacks We did imagine that she was President and thats why she isn't.

Quiet Patriota 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 的头像
Quiet Patriota 🇺🇸 🇮🇹1 年前

@DavidSacks We would be at war right now

bob gonzales 的头像
bob gonzales1 年前

@DavidSacks 🫡🔥✅

miguel magalhaes 的头像
miguel magalhaes1 年前

@DavidSacks I cant stand this shit. Unfollow.

Zinaford McDaniel 的头像
Zinaford McDaniel1 年前

@DavidSacks 100% a crisis created by Donald Trump. I could’ve as well threaded this by not attacking a country that hadn’t attacked my country and couldn’t.

相关视频

.David Sacks: “President Trump managed to … take out the Iranian nuclear sites … but he did not get dragged into a new Middle Eastern war. In fact, he negotiated a ceasefire … I think there's very few leaders who could have threaded this needle.”
2:25

.David Sacks: “President Trump managed to … take out the Iranian nuclear sites … but he did not get dragged into a new Middle Eastern war. In fact, he negotiated a ceasefire … I think there's very few leaders who could have threaded this needle.”

Chief Nerd

127,444 次观看 • 1 年前

NEW: Witkoff praises Trump’s precision on Iran—“He knows EXACTLY when to push the button and when to pull out.” Special Envoy Steve Witkoff says President Trump’s strategy on Iran was deliberate, disciplined, and completely misunderstood by many. “So many people had it wrong about the president.” “He had an objective. He wouldn’t have entered [the] 12-day war without that objective.” “The objective was to eliminate enrichment in Iran and weaponization capability on the part of Iran—and he achieved his objective.” “It was never going to be a forever war. It was never going to be a war just for war’s sake.” “It was a war to achieve an objective that I think most Americans should be very, very satisfied with.” And then came the line that says it all: “I can tell you that I was in those discussions. I watched our Commander in Chief.” “He’s got this uncanny ability to understand EXACTLY when to push the button and when to pull out.” “He achieved his objective—and that was the end of it.”
0:52

NEW: Witkoff praises Trump’s precision on Iran—“He knows EXACTLY when to push the button and when to pull out.” Special Envoy Steve Witkoff says President Trump’s strategy on Iran was deliberate, disciplined, and completely misunderstood by many. “So many people had it wrong about the president.” “He had an objective. He wouldn’t have entered [the] 12-day war without that objective.” “The objective was to eliminate enrichment in Iran and weaponization capability on the part of Iran—and he achieved his objective.” “It was never going to be a forever war. It was never going to be a war just for war’s sake.” “It was a war to achieve an objective that I think most Americans should be very, very satisfied with.” And then came the line that says it all: “I can tell you that I was in those discussions. I watched our Commander in Chief.” “He’s got this uncanny ability to understand EXACTLY when to push the button and when to pull out.” “He achieved his objective—and that was the end of it.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

52,125 次观看 • 1 年前

President Trump said he and Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed Iran during their high-stakes meetings and that the two leaders "feel very similar" on the war. “We don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon," Trump said on Friday.
0:28

President Trump said he and Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed Iran during their high-stakes meetings and that the two leaders "feel very similar" on the war. “We don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon," Trump said on Friday.

CBS News

14,775 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST NOW: "The main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon!" "They fully agreed to that with strong POLICING powers and they won't have a nuclear weapon, which is what it was all about because they probably would have used it if they had it." "So we had two big moments when we terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barack Hussein Obama deal." "And when I terminated, that was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran."
0:53

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST NOW: "The main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon!" "They fully agreed to that with strong POLICING powers and they won't have a nuclear weapon, which is what it was all about because they probably would have used it if they had it." "So we had two big moments when we terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barack Hussein Obama deal." "And when I terminated, that was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran."

Eric Daugherty

76,485 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ — President Trump on Iran: We ended the war with Iran today, and they have agreed never to have a nuclear weapon, something that we insisted on. That was the whole purpose. That was 95% of it, and they've done it in the most powerful way you can do it.
0:21

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ — President Trump on Iran: We ended the war with Iran today, and they have agreed never to have a nuclear weapon, something that we insisted on. That was the whole purpose. That was 95% of it, and they've done it in the most powerful way you can do it.

Commentary Donald J. Trump Truth Social Posts On X

289,084 次观看 • 1 个月前

.President Donald J. Trump on repositioning two U.S. nuclear subs: "We had to do that... A threat was made and we didn't think it was appropriate, so I have to be very careful — I do that on the basis of safety for our people."
0:22

.President Donald J. Trump on repositioning two U.S. nuclear subs: "We had to do that... A threat was made and we didn't think it was appropriate, so I have to be very careful — I do that on the basis of safety for our people."

Rapid Response 47

355,881 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume says Iran’s stance in the peace talks shows President Trump was CORRECT on their nuclear ambitions: “Here Iran is, badly battered, militarily crushed. They really don’t have any cards here other than the Strait of Hormuz which we are acting on.” “Yet they came into this negotiation absolutely refusing to give up their nuclear weapon ambitions which was the bottom line for the President and his negotiators.” “If that doesn’t emphasize that President Trump was correct in assessing in the beginning of this that Iran was still going for a nuclear weapon and it was something the world could not afford, then I don’t know what could.”
0:34

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume says Iran’s stance in the peace talks shows President Trump was CORRECT on their nuclear ambitions: “Here Iran is, badly battered, militarily crushed. They really don’t have any cards here other than the Strait of Hormuz which we are acting on.” “Yet they came into this negotiation absolutely refusing to give up their nuclear weapon ambitions which was the bottom line for the President and his negotiators.” “If that doesn’t emphasize that President Trump was correct in assessing in the beginning of this that Iran was still going for a nuclear weapon and it was something the world could not afford, then I don’t know what could.”

TV News Now

572,645 次观看 • 3 个月前

President Trump has always had two objectives in this war with Iran: 1) Stop Iran from having a nuclear weapon. 2) Control the Strait of Hormuz (which until now was controlled by Iran and Oman). Trump wants to control these different choke points around the world. It's important to keep in mind these two goals when analyzing the final terms of this deal, because we have to remember that Trump's goals were always different than the forever war neocon goals. There are neocons in our country and in the Middle East who want this war to drag on for decades because they profit off of it. They want a John Bolton-style complete annihilation of Iran. That was never President Trump. I want you to analyze this military operation based on whether or not Trump achieved the goals that he set out to achieve. Even the freedom of the Iranian people was never the primary goal. That's not why he staged this military operation. So when we do get the details of this MOU with Iran, remember what President Trump's two objectives were. My guess is that you will see both of those goals have been accomplished.
1:28

President Trump has always had two objectives in this war with Iran: 1) Stop Iran from having a nuclear weapon. 2) Control the Strait of Hormuz (which until now was controlled by Iran and Oman). Trump wants to control these different choke points around the world. It's important to keep in mind these two goals when analyzing the final terms of this deal, because we have to remember that Trump's goals were always different than the forever war neocon goals. There are neocons in our country and in the Middle East who want this war to drag on for decades because they profit off of it. They want a John Bolton-style complete annihilation of Iran. That was never President Trump. I want you to analyze this military operation based on whether or not Trump achieved the goals that he set out to achieve. Even the freedom of the Iranian people was never the primary goal. That's not why he staged this military operation. So when we do get the details of this MOU with Iran, remember what President Trump's two objectives were. My guess is that you will see both of those goals have been accomplished.

Liz Wheeler

35,889 次观看 • 1 个月前

When Abby Phillip questioned President Trump’s deal with Iran, Scott Jennings unloaded three key points on the CNN panel about the memorandum — including what President Trump told him directly on Sunday. JENNINGS: “Well, we’re talking to them because we want this conflict to end and we want to get to an ultimate goal where Iran doesn’t have any or the capacity to make any nuclear weapons.” “That is the principal goal. That’s number one.” “Number two, it would be wise for the administration to put this document out for everybody to look at, and they ought to do it as soon as they can, both for their allies who are interested, but also for the American people, because we’ve gone to war here.” “The American people deserve to know how this is going to come to an end.” “Number three, I talked to the president on Sunday, and he was, you know, telling me he was about to sign something with Iran, and he did.” “And he was excited to get the Strait of Hormuz open.” “But he said something very important to me, which is, look, if they don’t follow through on their commitments, we will start hitting them again.” “He’s clearly not taken further military action off the table.” “So we have some miles to travel down this road. The next mile will be on Friday when there’s a formal signing for the people who don’t trust Iran.” “Look, I agree with you. I think an Iranian signature is worth very, very little. But it could be worth something if the president keeps this Middle Eastern coalition together.”
1:10

When Abby Phillip questioned President Trump’s deal with Iran, Scott Jennings unloaded three key points on the CNN panel about the memorandum — including what President Trump told him directly on Sunday. JENNINGS: “Well, we’re talking to them because we want this conflict to end and we want to get to an ultimate goal where Iran doesn’t have any or the capacity to make any nuclear weapons.” “That is the principal goal. That’s number one.” “Number two, it would be wise for the administration to put this document out for everybody to look at, and they ought to do it as soon as they can, both for their allies who are interested, but also for the American people, because we’ve gone to war here.” “The American people deserve to know how this is going to come to an end.” “Number three, I talked to the president on Sunday, and he was, you know, telling me he was about to sign something with Iran, and he did.” “And he was excited to get the Strait of Hormuz open.” “But he said something very important to me, which is, look, if they don’t follow through on their commitments, we will start hitting them again.” “He’s clearly not taken further military action off the table.” “So we have some miles to travel down this road. The next mile will be on Friday when there’s a formal signing for the people who don’t trust Iran.” “Look, I agree with you. I think an Iranian signature is worth very, very little. But it could be worth something if the president keeps this Middle Eastern coalition together.”

Overton

133,119 次观看 • 1 个月前

Trump wants Putin to end the war in Ukraine faster. That would make it easier for the US to fight against Iran. 'I had a very good conversation with President Putin. There were many people on the line from both our side and his side. We talked about Ukraine, where there's an endless struggle going on. I think it was a positive conversation on this issue. Then, of course, we talked about the Middle East. And he wants to be helpful. I said: 'You could be much more helpful if the war between Ukraine and Russia ended' - that would really be more helpful. But we had a very good conversation. And he wants to act very constructively.' - SK
0:40

Trump wants Putin to end the war in Ukraine faster. That would make it easier for the US to fight against Iran. 'I had a very good conversation with President Putin. There were many people on the line from both our side and his side. We talked about Ukraine, where there's an endless struggle going on. I think it was a positive conversation on this issue. Then, of course, we talked about the Middle East. And he wants to be helpful. I said: 'You could be much more helpful if the war between Ukraine and Russia ended' - that would really be more helpful. But we had a very good conversation. And he wants to act very constructively.' - SK

Zlatti71

17,215 次观看 • 4 个月前

THOMAS MASSIE on Trump trying to whip his vote on the 2020 restatement that war powers resides with Congress "His argument... [was] that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted" "[But that would've] given [Trump] the power to declare war without Congress's involvement" "he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution... says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran" "his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State" "his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear" "finally, [maybe his] biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson" This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie) is taken from an interview with James Patrick (James Patrick) posted to YouTube on May 21, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "In January of 2020, I had a conversation with President Trump about war with Iran. Now, to put this in context, they killed Soleimani, not on Iranian soil, but in Iraq. And he was an Iranian general. And then, we had a drone flying over there, and they shot it down. "Now, whether it was over Iran or over the water, I don't know. Maybe we'll never know. But at that point, the president threatened to take action against Iran for that, and he was being encouraged to do so by members of his cabinet. "So we had a vote here in Congress in January of 2020, and the President heard that I was going to vote for no war. Basically, the vote was a restatement of the Constitution and that war powers resided in Congress. It was to say that President Trump cannot go to war with Iran without an act of Congress. "There were only three Republicans who voted for that. But the president heard that I was going to vote for it. So he called me up to whip me on this vote, and he said, I'm more, anti-war than you are. And I said, well, you— In fact, you are. You've not started a war. You're the first president that hasn't started a war. "Now, remember, this was his fourth year in office, 2020. You're the first president that hasn't started a war that I could vote for since I was 18. And he said, I guess you're right. Thank you for saying that. "His argument to me was that if we didn't constrict his ability to rattle the sabers and threaten war, that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted and therefore avoid war. And they said, well, that would work just fine unless they call your bluff. And then now we've given you the power to declare war without Congress's involvement, and you're obligated to war if your intention was to bluff. Now you're obligated to war. "And, that day, he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution that says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran. Now, fortunately, that war did not happen. But here we are in his second term, and I think he's— "You know, his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State. And then his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear. And then, you know, finally, it may be the biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson. "That was a mistake that, I think, led largely to him being predisposed to listening to Israel's interests over America's interests with regard to war with Iran."
3:01

THOMAS MASSIE on Trump trying to whip his vote on the 2020 restatement that war powers resides with Congress "His argument... [was] that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted" "[But that would've] given [Trump] the power to declare war without Congress's involvement" "he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution... says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran" "his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State" "his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear" "finally, [maybe his] biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson" This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie) is taken from an interview with James Patrick (James Patrick) posted to YouTube on May 21, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "In January of 2020, I had a conversation with President Trump about war with Iran. Now, to put this in context, they killed Soleimani, not on Iranian soil, but in Iraq. And he was an Iranian general. And then, we had a drone flying over there, and they shot it down. "Now, whether it was over Iran or over the water, I don't know. Maybe we'll never know. But at that point, the president threatened to take action against Iran for that, and he was being encouraged to do so by members of his cabinet. "So we had a vote here in Congress in January of 2020, and the President heard that I was going to vote for no war. Basically, the vote was a restatement of the Constitution and that war powers resided in Congress. It was to say that President Trump cannot go to war with Iran without an act of Congress. "There were only three Republicans who voted for that. But the president heard that I was going to vote for it. So he called me up to whip me on this vote, and he said, I'm more, anti-war than you are. And I said, well, you— In fact, you are. You've not started a war. You're the first president that hasn't started a war. "Now, remember, this was his fourth year in office, 2020. You're the first president that hasn't started a war that I could vote for since I was 18. And he said, I guess you're right. Thank you for saying that. "His argument to me was that if we didn't constrict his ability to rattle the sabers and threaten war, that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted and therefore avoid war. And they said, well, that would work just fine unless they call your bluff. And then now we've given you the power to declare war without Congress's involvement, and you're obligated to war if your intention was to bluff. Now you're obligated to war. "And, that day, he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution that says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran. Now, fortunately, that war did not happen. But here we are in his second term, and I think he's— "You know, his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State. And then his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear. And then, you know, finally, it may be the biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson. "That was a mistake that, I think, led largely to him being predisposed to listening to Israel's interests over America's interests with regard to war with Iran."

Sense Receptor

65,082 次观看 • 1 个月前

President Trump told reporters on Wednesday he had not made a final decision on whether to strike Iran. "I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, because things change, especially with war," he said. The president added that he believes "Iran can't have a nuclear weapon" because it would cause "too much devastation" and that "they'd use it."
1:10

President Trump told reporters on Wednesday he had not made a final decision on whether to strike Iran. "I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, because things change, especially with war," he said. The president added that he believes "Iran can't have a nuclear weapon" because it would cause "too much devastation" and that "they'd use it."

CBS News

31,080 次观看 • 1 年前

Roughly thirty minutes later, it happened. President Trump and President Putin stepped onto the stage…together. Putin spoke first. He began with a word of thanks to Trump, then drifted briefly into a history of Russian-Alaskan relations, as only Putin would. But he quickly got to the point. He said progress had been made. An agreement of some kind had been reached. And without Trump, he added, none of it would have been possible. “I would like to thank President Trump for our joint work, for the well-wishing and trustworthy tone of our conversation,” he said. He praised Trump’s clarity, saying the U.S. president “sincerely cares about the prosperity of his nation,” while still recognizing Russia’s own national interests. Putin said the day’s talks could serve as a starting point…not just for Ukraine, but for rebuilding practical, ‘businesslike’ relations between Russia and the United States. Then came a jab at the Biden administration. He recalled warning America in 2022 that things were spiraling toward a point of no return. His warning, he said, was ignored. “I said it quite directly back then that it’s a big mistake.” And that is when he dropped a NUKE. It was the moment that would make headlines around the world and INFURIATE the mainstream media. Their narrative was dead. “Today, when President Trump was saying that if he was the president back then, there would be no war—and I’m quite sure that it would indeed be so. I can confirm that.” It was a public validation of something Trump had been saying for years. Putin ended on a hopeful note. “I think that overall, me and President Trump have built a very good, businesslike and trustworthy contact. And I have every reason to believe that moving down this path, we can come—to the end of the conflict in Ukraine.”
1:39

Roughly thirty minutes later, it happened. President Trump and President Putin stepped onto the stage…together. Putin spoke first. He began with a word of thanks to Trump, then drifted briefly into a history of Russian-Alaskan relations, as only Putin would. But he quickly got to the point. He said progress had been made. An agreement of some kind had been reached. And without Trump, he added, none of it would have been possible. “I would like to thank President Trump for our joint work, for the well-wishing and trustworthy tone of our conversation,” he said. He praised Trump’s clarity, saying the U.S. president “sincerely cares about the prosperity of his nation,” while still recognizing Russia’s own national interests. Putin said the day’s talks could serve as a starting point…not just for Ukraine, but for rebuilding practical, ‘businesslike’ relations between Russia and the United States. Then came a jab at the Biden administration. He recalled warning America in 2022 that things were spiraling toward a point of no return. His warning, he said, was ignored. “I said it quite directly back then that it’s a big mistake.” And that is when he dropped a NUKE. It was the moment that would make headlines around the world and INFURIATE the mainstream media. Their narrative was dead. “Today, when President Trump was saying that if he was the president back then, there would be no war—and I’m quite sure that it would indeed be so. I can confirm that.” It was a public validation of something Trump had been saying for years. Putin ended on a hopeful note. “I think that overall, me and President Trump have built a very good, businesslike and trustworthy contact. And I have every reason to believe that moving down this path, we can come—to the end of the conflict in Ukraine.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

48,859 次观看 • 11 个月前

Chamath Palihapitiya says President Trump has been “way more right than wrong” and explained why Trump’s stance on Iran ultimately won him over. Palihapitiya said Trump’s unwavering position against a nuclear-armed was about preventing the one scenario that could threaten civilization itself. PALIHAPITIYA: “On the broad based things that he did, I think that he has been way more right than wrong.” SORKIN: “Where do you land on the war in Iran?” PALIHAPITIYA: “The most important thing that got me to see his point of view is he was completely binary on there can not be nuclear war.” “And what’s so interesting about, you know, like Warren Buffett in that last segment, who, by the way, should give all of his money if he wants to give it away to Trump Accounts…” “If you ask Buffett, Buffett would also say the same thing. He and Munger used to say in their letters, there’s only one risk for humanity: nuclear war.” “And so when you have a madman country that is attempting to destabilize the ability for all of us just to live our lives, I think he was pulled into a situation he didn’t want to be in because he believed strongly in no nuclear weapons.” “I support that because I think everybody is forgetting the chaos that that kind of thing can create in the world.” Chamath Palihapitiya
1:02

Chamath Palihapitiya says President Trump has been “way more right than wrong” and explained why Trump’s stance on Iran ultimately won him over. Palihapitiya said Trump’s unwavering position against a nuclear-armed was about preventing the one scenario that could threaten civilization itself. PALIHAPITIYA: “On the broad based things that he did, I think that he has been way more right than wrong.” SORKIN: “Where do you land on the war in Iran?” PALIHAPITIYA: “The most important thing that got me to see his point of view is he was completely binary on there can not be nuclear war.” “And what’s so interesting about, you know, like Warren Buffett in that last segment, who, by the way, should give all of his money if he wants to give it away to Trump Accounts…” “If you ask Buffett, Buffett would also say the same thing. He and Munger used to say in their letters, there’s only one risk for humanity: nuclear war.” “And so when you have a madman country that is attempting to destabilize the ability for all of us just to live our lives, I think he was pulled into a situation he didn’t want to be in because he believed strongly in no nuclear weapons.” “I support that because I think everybody is forgetting the chaos that that kind of thing can create in the world.” Chamath Palihapitiya

Overton

76,178 次观看 • 2 天前

CNN's Fareed Zakaria on Trump bombing Iran: " It is extraordinary. I think trump has managed to do something that he, to be fair to him, had always marked out, which was he did not want Iran to have a nuclear program, but what's clear is in the last few weeks, he shifted ground on two issues. The first was he had started out in a position which was Iran can have some enrichment, just has to be monitored, things like that. He moved to what was essentially the Israeli position, which was zero enrichment, and he and he outlined that in the middle of about two weeks ago, the second is that he seemed to have lost faith that the Iranians were negotiating in, in earnest and he got -- he seems to have gotten frustrated because I think this was not his first option. His first option was a deal with the Iranians, but the maximalist condition he placed was zero enrichment was was one the Iranians didn't seem willing to go to and he was I think he thought the Iranians were not negotiating earnestly, so the result is you have you have this extraordinary move, which almost certainly has destroyed almost all of Iran's enrichment. The question, however, is you still need diplomacy. You still need a political solution, because the Iranians can rebuild."
2:33

CNN's Fareed Zakaria on Trump bombing Iran: " It is extraordinary. I think trump has managed to do something that he, to be fair to him, had always marked out, which was he did not want Iran to have a nuclear program, but what's clear is in the last few weeks, he shifted ground on two issues. The first was he had started out in a position which was Iran can have some enrichment, just has to be monitored, things like that. He moved to what was essentially the Israeli position, which was zero enrichment, and he and he outlined that in the middle of about two weeks ago, the second is that he seemed to have lost faith that the Iranians were negotiating in, in earnest and he got -- he seems to have gotten frustrated because I think this was not his first option. His first option was a deal with the Iranians, but the maximalist condition he placed was zero enrichment was was one the Iranians didn't seem willing to go to and he was I think he thought the Iranians were not negotiating earnestly, so the result is you have you have this extraordinary move, which almost certainly has destroyed almost all of Iran's enrichment. The question, however, is you still need diplomacy. You still need a political solution, because the Iranians can rebuild."

Curtis Houck

1,557,343 次观看 • 1 年前

Trump: "I was very happy to hear [Putin] say that if I was president that war would have never happened." Hannity: "Did any of the specifics come up as to why he said that?" Trump: "It did. It doesn't matter at this point.”
1:14

Trump: "I was very happy to hear [Putin] say that if I was president that war would have never happened." Hannity: "Did any of the specifics come up as to why he said that?" Trump: "It did. It doesn't matter at this point.”

The Bulwark

151,634 次观看 • 11 个月前

President Donald Trump said Thursday that he wouldn’t use a nuclear weapon in Iran and that nobody should be allowed to use them. “We don't need it. Why do I need it? Why would a stupid question like that be asked? Why would I use a nuclear weapon where we've totally in a very conventional way decimated them without it,” Trump said in a response to a question by PBS News’ Liz Landers. “A nuclear weapon should never be allowed to be used by anybody,” he added. Trump has often said that preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is one of the reasons for launching the nearly two-month war. “You cannot give Iran a nuclear weapon. This is all about a nuclear weapon. They cannot have the nuclear bomb, and they're not going to have the nuclear bomb,” Trump said during his appearance Thursday in the Oval Office. Earlier this month, the president threatened that a “whole civilization will die” if Iran didn’t concede to his deadline to make a deal. Trump pulled back from that threat, leading to a temporary ceasefire.
0:42

President Donald Trump said Thursday that he wouldn’t use a nuclear weapon in Iran and that nobody should be allowed to use them. “We don't need it. Why do I need it? Why would a stupid question like that be asked? Why would I use a nuclear weapon where we've totally in a very conventional way decimated them without it,” Trump said in a response to a question by PBS News’ Liz Landers. “A nuclear weapon should never be allowed to be used by anybody,” he added. Trump has often said that preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is one of the reasons for launching the nearly two-month war. “You cannot give Iran a nuclear weapon. This is all about a nuclear weapon. They cannot have the nuclear bomb, and they're not going to have the nuclear bomb,” Trump said during his appearance Thursday in the Oval Office. Earlier this month, the president threatened that a “whole civilization will die” if Iran didn’t concede to his deadline to make a deal. Trump pulled back from that threat, leading to a temporary ceasefire.

PBS News

15,936 次观看 • 2 个月前

Ben Shapiro TORCHES Tucker Carlson: “I do not regret my vote for President Trump in 2024. Not one iota. Not one bit. And frankly, I find the entire conversation about regret pretty confusing, because here is the thing: the alternative would have been President Kamala Harris.” “Let’s be clear, the vast majority of things that President Trump said he would deliver on, he has delivered on. And the vast majority of principles that he said that be believed in, he has effectuated.” “So why are all of these people suddenly confused? He is doing the things he’s been saying for 40 years he’s going to do, and why do they think it would have been better if Kamala Harris was President of the United States?”
5:44

Ben Shapiro TORCHES Tucker Carlson: “I do not regret my vote for President Trump in 2024. Not one iota. Not one bit. And frankly, I find the entire conversation about regret pretty confusing, because here is the thing: the alternative would have been President Kamala Harris.” “Let’s be clear, the vast majority of things that President Trump said he would deliver on, he has delivered on. And the vast majority of principles that he said that be believed in, he has effectuated.” “So why are all of these people suddenly confused? He is doing the things he’s been saying for 40 years he’s going to do, and why do they think it would have been better if Kamala Harris was President of the United States?”

RedWave Press

716,495 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 MARCO RUBIO ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S DEBATE WITH POPE LEO: "What the President basically said is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon because they would use it against places that have a lot of Catholics and Christians and others for that matter!" "It goes back to the central point. I think the President, without trying to speak for him, but I think I can characterize it this way. He doesn't understand why anybody, leave aside the Pope." "The President and I for that matter, I think most people, I cannot understand why ANYONE would think that it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Straits right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "They have these sailors on commercial ships that are going to starve to death out there. They don't care. They don't care that this is melting the economies around the world, even of their own allies." "This is what they're doing with the Straits. What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do."
1:22

🚨 MARCO RUBIO ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S DEBATE WITH POPE LEO: "What the President basically said is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon because they would use it against places that have a lot of Catholics and Christians and others for that matter!" "It goes back to the central point. I think the President, without trying to speak for him, but I think I can characterize it this way. He doesn't understand why anybody, leave aside the Pope." "The President and I for that matter, I think most people, I cannot understand why ANYONE would think that it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Straits right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "They have these sailors on commercial ships that are going to starve to death out there. They don't care. They don't care that this is melting the economies around the world, even of their own allies." "This is what they're doing with the Straits. What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do."

Eric Daugherty

18,840 次观看 • 2 个月前

President Trump says Iran was only "two weeks away" from obtaining a nuclear weapon, which he claims they would have used against Israel and the entire Middle East. “I would say it was a guarantee that it would’ve been used.” “They were ready to go.”
0:33

President Trump says Iran was only "two weeks away" from obtaining a nuclear weapon, which he claims they would have used against Israel and the entire Middle East. “I would say it was a guarantee that it would’ve been used.” “They were ready to go.”

Shadow of Ezra

140,543 次观看 • 1 个月前