Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Sadiq Khan is more interested in politically correct posturing for the benefit of his left-wing friends than he is making London a safe and nice place. Cannabis is illegal for a reason. Possession of cannabis should not be decriminalised. We have seen some US and Canadian cities devastated by...

25,902 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля dave lawrence 🐟🐟🐠
dave lawrence 🐟🐟🐠1 год назад

No-one is talking of decriminalisation or legalisation. They are talking about 'personal use' levels not being a crime. They are very different issues and conflating them for political gain is a poor look.

Фото профиля Peter Reynolds
Peter Reynolds1 год назад

Your ignorance or wilful distortion of the evidence is astounding!

Фото профиля Kris
Kris1 год назад

@CCHQPress What you said about cannabis was completely incorrect btw.. learn some things.. alcohol is FAR more dangerous,heck sugar is more dangerous.

Фото профиля Estadio Deportes
Estadio Deportes1 год назад

MANTIENE LA POSTURA 🫡 Pese a su actitud 'neutral', Roger Goodell se pronunció sobre las políticas de diversidad que Trump está implementando en Estados Unidos. Descubre qué dijo aquí. 👇 #NFL #RogerGoodell #Trump

Фото профиля Morgan Stewart
Morgan Stewart1 год назад

This is why politicians are hated. Trying to score cheap political points but ignoring the evidence before them

Фото профиля Heather Jeeves 🇪🇺
Heather Jeeves 🇪🇺1 год назад

Your little podcasts are annoying.

Фото профиля TylerForLegalisation
TylerForLegalisation1 год назад

How about clamping down on use of cocaine and drugs like that which are more likely to end a life? People like you are the reason why suffering people chose to make themselves feel like criminals for medical treatment

Фото профиля dan
dan1 год назад

the streets are full of anti social drunks, stoners cant be arsed to get off the sofa to go cause trouble and it would bring in billions for the economy idiot.

Фото профиля John Brierley
John Brierley1 год назад

Philp a leading light in ‘Team Truss’! Think that says all we need to know in terms of how utterly inept and incompetent he is!

Фото профиля Morgan Stewart
Morgan Stewart1 год назад

How much have you been drinking. That’s your drug of choice and it’s a lot worse for you than a bit of herb.

Фото профиля Billy Garvin
Billy Garvin1 год назад

Alcohol is associated with anti-social behaviour and its use can lead to severe physical and mental health problems, we all know why all governments wont decriminalise cannabis, but that's ok because thanks to the war on drugs it has never been more freely available.

Похожие видео

Sadiq Khan's pilgrimage to Mecca reveals his hypocrisy. Where are his "Trans Pride" flags? Why isn't he calling for women's rights and LGBTQ tolerance? Where are the other religions, the Jews and the Christians? As London Mayor, Sadiq calls for religious plurality, higher immigration and for us to accept lots of Muslims into our country. Why isn't he doing the same in Saudi Arabia? This a pilgrimage to the spiritual centre of the faith that guides him. And in Saudi Arabia, there are no churches or synagogues. As in much of the Muslim world, Jews and Christians were converted, expelled or slaughtered. The government still prohibits public worship from Jews or Christians, unlike Sadiq Khan's London, where he encourages mass public Islamic prayer. Why isn't Sadiq Khan calling for Jews and Christians to be accepted in Saudi Arabia and their public worship to be funded by the Saudi government? Clearly, it's politically expedient for Sadiq Khan to support religious plurality, women's rights, and LGBTQ rights in Britain now, but Britain's demographics are changing fast. The Muslim population is increasing rapidly, while the native British population declines. Once the demographic tipping point has been reached, will Sadiq and politicians like him still stick to the values that suit them now? Or will they switch to supporting the values that will be more politically expedient in a Muslim majority country, the values that are on display in Saudi Arabia?

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

110,426 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

There is nothing more disgusting than a government using a parent's grief as cover to ram through bad law. Emma Mason is being used. You can see just how cruel the government is, on this interview with Deb Knight on A Current Affair last night. Her grief is being abused by governments and the media in Australia to justify removing access to social media from all children under the age of 16. Worse than that, they are using her to justify the most draconian internet access rules in the world, and it’s not just for kids. Every adult in Australia will have to age verify to get online to use sites like YouTube, facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X. Emma’s story, and that of her daughter is tragic, but the truth is: banning selective social media access will not stop bullying. It will not save the lives of children, and it does not absolve parental responsibility. Outsourcing parenting to government is both cowardly and foolish. Anyone who caught the ABC Lateline piece from 1975 released on this platform by John Adams earlier this week, would know, the Australian Government does not care about our children. We’ve seen real harm perpetrated on kids at government and government regulated childcare facilities. We see a rise in juvenile crime and weak bail laws, encouraging kids to perpetrate more and more extreme crime, and we know there still exists a culture of coverup when it comes to child harm among the establishment elite. The people who have drafted and passed the social media age ban laws are either not au fait with technology, or worse, they are authoritarian bullies who do not want any criticism from the only outlet available to the public – social media. Most disturbing to me though, is this misconceived belief that parents need the government to ban social media so they can parent their children. That is most certainly not the case. Mason further calls on even more government to provide the resources to help parents copilot the law. Because even she can see that it is an absolute mess that will cause harm. The government is an uncaring and incompetent machine, and most Australians seem completely unaware of those facts. The law only impacts the law abiding, and silly laws make for more lawlessness. The social media age ban and the subsequent requirement for adult identification is a silly law. It is possible to circumvent, and it will be circumvented. It will also breed a culture of lawlessness among our youth, and when they start to get away with these smaller ‘crimes’, they will indeed feel emboldened to test other laws. I am tired of Australian governments using tragedy to take more of our rights and freedoms away. We don’t need the government’s help to parent our children or lull us into the false sense of security that they keep us and our children safe. Go shopping in Melbourne and see how safe you feel. Watching the heartless machine use a mother’s grief is painful. It is disgusting. Albanese, Ley and the rest of the Australian political establishment should be ashamed of themselves, because they know exactly what they are doing. We must not stand for this. We must resist, push back and not comply. It is nothing more than a government sponsored attack on our privacy and free speech. It has nothing to do with child safety. We must parent our own children and educate them on how much we have already lost in the name of security and safety. We must show them that we don’t support the government, and maybe by the time they have grown up and are voting, we can start to elect people who deserve to be in leadership positions. Because the people we have right now are a danger to our future prosperity. This is not Australia. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

29,745 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Revealed: Sadiq Khan's disturbing connections to Muslim extremists Khan portrays himself as soft centre-left Labour. How can that be squared with his support for, & defence of radical Muslim extremists, anti-Semites & misogynists? Khan defended the vile Muslim scholar Dr Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, saying "he is not the extremist that he is painted as being." Really? Al-Qaradawi justifies wife beating, discusses whether homosexuals should be killed and supports suicide bombers. In 2004 Khan was on a platform with five Islamic extremists at a conference in London organised by Al-Aqsa, a group that has published works by the notorious Holocaust denier Paul Eisen. From 2001-2002, Khan was a solicitor for the despicable "Nation of Islam" and tried to overturn the travel ban preventing its appalling leader, Louis Farrakhan, from entering the UK. Louis Farrakhan is a rampant anti-Semite who combines black power with Islam. Farrakhan has described Jews as ‘blood-suckers’ and called Hitler ‘a very great man’ In 2006, when Khan was an MP, Khan was one of the signatories of a letter to the Guardian that blamed terrorist incidents, such as 7/7, not on Islamic extremism but on British foreign policy and Britain's support for Israel. Khan likes to portray himself as part of the soft centre Left of politics, a fuzzy progressive. In truth he is far closer to Jeremy Corbyn and the independent Muslim vote MPs. Remember Khan nominated Corbyn for the leadership contest in 2015. And Khan wouldn’t have won the election without the support of Corbyn’s allies, including Len McCluskey, the unions and Momentum – the radically far-left organisation that got the vote out for him. No surprise either that his biggest cheerleaders are other far left radicals like Owen Jones, Dianne Abbott and Dawn Butler.

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

201,643 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад