正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 SAFA with Blunders, rember the ref complaint about the NET before the game? This is why VAR is needed in PSL That was not a goal—the ball hit the side netting from the outside. Breakdown of the Sequence The Corner Kick: Polokwane City take a corner kick from... the left flank (0:15–0:16). Flight of the Ball: The cross curls over the pack in the box and dips toward the near post / side of the net. The Contact & Optical Illusion (0:17–0:21): The ball lands on the outside side-netting right next to the post. Because of the angle and how the net bulges outward, it briefly gives the visual illusion from the opposite side that the ball went inside. The Goalkeeper’s Position (0:20–0:22): Goalkeeper Brandon Peterson immediately drops to his knees outside the goal frame against the side mesh where the ball settled—he is not picking the ball out from inside the net. Player Reactions (0:03–0:07 & 0:22–0:31): While a few Chiefs players initially raise their hands thinking it went in, the referee and assistant failed to correct the call: no goal, side netting / this was supposed to be a goal kick. But the Ref gave it a Goal which I think PSL will look at this on Monday and I think the game might be replayed Polokwane City v Kaizer Chiefs | Match Highlights This highlight video provides a complete view of key match moments and decisions.🙆‍♂️ 📲 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 BREAKING NEWS 𝐨𝐧 Twitter :show more

MrksPSLClub

14,812 subscribers

123,016 次观看 • 11 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治体育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

25 条评论

KBucs - triple treble champs 的头像

KBucs - triple treble champs11 天前

So why do you think players did not protest?

Sandile 的头像

Sandile10 天前

You like to always spread rumours. This was a clear goal. It came off Peterson chest to go inside. You obviously chosing to show this angle on purpose

Sandz. 的头像

Sandz.10 天前

It’s a goal, y’all rest !

Bathong Tshepo 的头像

Bathong Tshepo10 天前

Yup! The pain has landed safely

Laolao 的头像

Laolao11 天前

What?

iTOUCHCANDI 的头像

iTOUCHCANDI10 天前

It is a goal

Zaruska 的头像

Zaruska10 天前

Even the goal keeper is not complaining nor that white guy it's a clear goal brother myb on another angle u will see it better

Rajesh 的头像

Rajesh10 天前

Bloody liar

Bongeka 的头像

Bongeka10 天前

Why did the keeper protest

Romario 的头像

Romario10 天前

😂😂😂😂😂

Azanian-Soul 的头像

Azanian-Soul10 天前

🤣🤣😂😂BS

mthuthuzeli 的头像

mthuthuzeli10 天前

It's a goal......

Joe Slolo 的头像

Joe Slolo10 天前

Polokwane created problems. Big English will be on display for days to come.

Dildo of Consequences 🌵 的头像

Dildo of Consequences 🌵10 天前

KC fans are something else man🤣🤣

2026 Caf champions 的头像

2026 Caf champions10 天前

STOP smoking whatever that you smoke bra

Ncamisile 的头像

Ncamisile10 天前

😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

k laz 的头像

k laz10 天前

So ma guy stop bringing the league into disrepute it’s a goal even the keeper didn’t protest rest mchana the keeper is the mbobo here

⭐️⭐️ 2026 CAFCL Champ Neo 的头像

⭐️⭐️ 2026 CAFCL Champ Neo10 天前

Shame on PSL

yonda396 的头像

yonda39610 天前

Analyzed nonsense

Bhut'Malume 的头像

Bhut'Malume10 天前

I saw they were "fixing" it before the game started..this is not a goal.

Red Lion 的头像

Red Lion11 天前

Delete this

Sbonelo Mkhonza 的头像

Sbonelo Mkhonza10 天前

Clear goal

Sekepe Malatji 的头像

Sekepe Malatji10 天前

😀😀😀😀😀

🏴‍☠️☠️MONYANE🏴‍☠️☠️🆙⭐ 的头像

🏴‍☠️☠️MONYANE🏴‍☠️☠️🆙⭐10 天前

Stop blaming wrong people that's a clear goal

Lazarus Amon Shoko 的头像

Lazarus Amon Shoko10 天前

Fool go and report to the police

相关视频

Croatia was kicked out of the match because Matanic touched the ball with his hair AND the referee had to decide if Viega’s contact with the ball is considered “deliberate play”. If yes, the goal was correct, but the referee decided “no”. But what are the rules saying? In FIFA and IFAB Laws of the Game, deliberate play is when a player has control of the ball and attempts to pass, gain possession, or clear it. *‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of: •passing the ball to a team-mate; •gaining possession of the ball; or •clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) ➡️clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) And that’s what Viega did. He cleared the ball. But a Croatian player managed to intercept the ball before it went out of play; that led to the goal. Croatia was robbed. Source in comments.

Croatia was kicked out of the match because Matanic touched the ball with his hair AND the referee had to decide if Viega’s contact with the ball is considered “deliberate play”. If yes, the goal was correct, but the referee decided “no”. But what are the rules saying? In FIFA and IFAB Laws of the Game, deliberate play is when a player has control of the ball and attempts to pass, gain possession, or clear it. *‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of: •passing the ball to a team-mate; •gaining possession of the ball; or •clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) ➡️clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) And that’s what Viega did. He cleared the ball. But a Croatian player managed to intercept the ball before it went out of play; that led to the goal. Croatia was robbed. Source in comments.

Goran Majić

35,165 次观看 • 2 个月前

08/04/1995 Newcastle were leading Norwich 1-0 through a Peter Beardsley penalty when the same man picked the ball up out on the right-hand side. Next thing you know the ball is in the back of the net. Amazing from one of my all-time favourite players. Clive Tyldesley on 🎙️

08/04/1995 Newcastle were leading Norwich 1-0 through a Peter Beardsley penalty when the same man picked the ball up out on the right-hand side. Next thing you know the ball is in the back of the net. Amazing from one of my all-time favourite players. Clive Tyldesley on 🎙️

When Football Was Better

48,531 次观看 • 5 个月前

September 1970 The famous ghost goal at Stamford Bridge for Chelsea and Alan Hudson against Ipswich. No goal-line technology then or VAR, but how does the referee actually think it’s a goal when it clearly hits the side netting, and the referee is on the same side? Should have gone to Specsavers!

September 1970 The famous ghost goal at Stamford Bridge for Chelsea and Alan Hudson against Ipswich. No goal-line technology then or VAR, but how does the referee actually think it’s a goal when it clearly hits the side netting, and the referee is on the same side? Should have gone to Specsavers!

TV Football 1968-92

119,860 次观看 • 8 个月前

Karl-Anthony Towns is asked about how important it would be for the Knicks to take a 2-0 lead in the series: "I don't think of anything like that. It's 0-0, the next game is the most important game of the year."

Karl-Anthony Towns is asked about how important it would be for the Knicks to take a 2-0 lead in the series: "I don't think of anything like that. It's 0-0, the next game is the most important game of the year."

SNY Knicks

168,663 次观看 • 3 个月前

Guess this is the other side of the coin, in terms of the playing out from the back? And suspect Valakari is pleased that despite it costing us a goal earlier they were brave enough to do this and almost get a goal back Lots of players on that left side hard to contain

Guess this is the other side of the coin, in terms of the playing out from the back? And suspect Valakari is pleased that despite it costing us a goal earlier they were brave enough to do this and almost get a goal back Lots of players on that left side hard to contain

St Johnstone Analysis

66,157 次观看 • 24 天前

Ollie Tanner strikes the ball towards goal and his Alex Robertson in the face which should result in a goal kick The referee had a different view of it and gave a corner to Cardiff City 😳 These EFL officials need to go to Specsavers #CardiffCity #pufc

Ollie Tanner strikes the ball towards goal and his Alex Robertson in the face which should result in a goal kick The referee had a different view of it and gave a corner to Cardiff City 😳 These EFL officials need to go to Specsavers #CardiffCity #pufc

AllAboutLeagueOne

51,920 次观看 • 5 个月前

The most controversial moments in sports. 1.) Diego Maradona, is famous for his "Hand of God" goal during the 1986 World Cup. This controversial moment happened in a quarterfinal match against England on June 22, 1986, in Mexico City. Six minutes into the second half, with the game scoreless, England's Steve Hodge accidentally kicked the ball into his own penalty area. Maradona jumped and used his fist to punch the ball past England's goalkeeper, Peter Shilton, scoring a goal. Using hands is illegal in soccer, but the referee, Ali Bin Nasser, did not see the foul, and despite the English players' protests, the goal stood. After the match, Maradona famously said the goal was made "a little with the head of Maradona and a little with the hand of God." Argentina went on to win the 1986 World Cup. Maradona died in 2020 at 60 years old. In November 2022, the ball from the "Hand of God" goal was auctioned as part of a World Cup memorabilia sale.

The most controversial moments in sports. 1.) Diego Maradona, is famous for his "Hand of God" goal during the 1986 World Cup. This controversial moment happened in a quarterfinal match against England on June 22, 1986, in Mexico City. Six minutes into the second half, with the game scoreless, England's Steve Hodge accidentally kicked the ball into his own penalty area. Maradona jumped and used his fist to punch the ball past England's goalkeeper, Peter Shilton, scoring a goal. Using hands is illegal in soccer, but the referee, Ali Bin Nasser, did not see the foul, and despite the English players' protests, the goal stood. After the match, Maradona famously said the goal was made "a little with the head of Maradona and a little with the hand of God." Argentina went on to win the 1986 World Cup. Maradona died in 2020 at 60 years old. In November 2022, the ball from the "Hand of God" goal was auctioned as part of a World Cup memorabilia sale.

Fascinating

9,958,188 次观看 • 2 年前

Trevino on how to spin the ball: “To trap the ball and put backspin on it, you must put the ball in the center of your stance. Put about 80% or 75% of your weight over to the left side.” This is a great lesson for amateurs who do the compete opposite!

Trevino on how to spin the ball: “To trap the ball and put backspin on it, you must put the ball in the center of your stance. Put about 80% or 75% of your weight over to the left side.” This is a great lesson for amateurs who do the compete opposite!

Flushing It

226,812 次观看 • 3 年前

𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗭𝗔𝗡𝗔'𝗦 𝗙𝗖𝗦𝗕 𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗧𝗢𝗣 𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗧 Siyabonga Ngezana was involved in the build up to the 2nd FCSB goal as his long ball led to a comedy of errors. 🌨️ 😂 I thought they would call the game off due to snow, but it went ahead with a high visibility ball. ☃️ FCSB won on the night 0-2 against Gloria Buzau and go top of the league.

𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗭𝗔𝗡𝗔'𝗦 𝗙𝗖𝗦𝗕 𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗧𝗢𝗣 𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗧 Siyabonga Ngezana was involved in the build up to the 2nd FCSB goal as his long ball led to a comedy of errors. 🌨️ 😂 I thought they would call the game off due to snow, but it went ahead with a high visibility ball. ☃️ FCSB won on the night 0-2 against Gloria Buzau and go top of the league.

Sahil Ebrahim

104,562 次观看 • 1 年前

I will never understand this in soccer. In the time he was rolling on the ground the ball went all the way across the field to the other team's goalie, who then put it in play for England to make a run back at their goal. Ball went the length of the field almost twice while this dude is keeping himself out of the game.

I will never understand this in soccer. In the time he was rolling on the ground the ball went all the way across the field to the other team's goalie, who then put it in play for England to make a run back at their goal. Ball went the length of the field almost twice while this dude is keeping himself out of the game.

TheChartGuys

11,504 次观看 • 2 个月前

Kendrick Perkins predicts that the Rockets will beat the Lakers and be the first team to successfully comeback from down 3-0 😳 “I’m sorry because LeBron is gonna be on the wrong side of it. But right now, in this series, it favors the Rockets.”

Kendrick Perkins predicts that the Rockets will beat the Lakers and be the first team to successfully comeback from down 3-0 😳 “I’m sorry because LeBron is gonna be on the wrong side of it. But right now, in this series, it favors the Rockets.”

ClutchPoints

130,109 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

Check VAR World Cup

74,462 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 THE EVIDENCE MAKGOPA "GHOST GOAL" AUDIT: WAS HE OFFSIDE? No, Evidence Makgopa was ONSIDE in this specific buildup. Once again, I used VAR Sytem like to analyze Pirates Sibelebele's Goal which was correct, no Offside. THE "LOCKED IN" REALITY CHECK: THE POSITIONING: In this video, you can see the moment the ball is played toward the edge of the box. Look at Aden McCarthy and Given Msimango (the yellow jerseys). Makgopa is actually positioned behind the ball and level with the second-to-last defender as the cross comes in. The "Special Rule" here is the timing of the run—he stayed in the "Brain" of the defense perfectly. THE EQUALIZER FACTOR: This exact phase of play led to the 75th-minute equalizer by Kamogelo Sebelebele. While Makgopa was the "Thunder" target for the cross, the ball actually fell to Sebelebele after a partial clearance/block. Since Makgopa was onside during the initial pass, the goal was 100% "Masterpiece" legal. THE APPOLLIS CONFUSION: Don't let the "Wind" of the earlier controversy fool you! Many fans are confusing this with the Oswin Appollis goal that was correctly ruled offside in the 19th minute. Makgopa’s positioning throughout the second half was "Locked In" and clinical. THE "PHANTOM" WAS LEGAL. Makgopa might be the "Grootman" of scoring against Chiefs, but in this specific picture and the video, he played by the rules to "Fix The Country" of the scoreline. The goal stood, the points were shared, and the "Project 2026" title race just got even more "Thunder"ous! 🔥 KHOSI NATION & THE GHOST, now that the "Brain" data confirms Makgopa was onside for the equalizer buildup, do you think Chiefs’ defense "dribbled" themselves by dropping too deep, or was the Pirates' pressure simply too "Locked In" to stop? 🇿🇦🤔💭 #EvidenceMakgopa #SowetoDerby #OffsideAudit

🚨 THE EVIDENCE MAKGOPA "GHOST GOAL" AUDIT: WAS HE OFFSIDE? No, Evidence Makgopa was ONSIDE in this specific buildup. Once again, I used VAR Sytem like to analyze Pirates Sibelebele's Goal which was correct, no Offside. THE "LOCKED IN" REALITY CHECK: THE POSITIONING: In this video, you can see the moment the ball is played toward the edge of the box. Look at Aden McCarthy and Given Msimango (the yellow jerseys). Makgopa is actually positioned behind the ball and level with the second-to-last defender as the cross comes in. The "Special Rule" here is the timing of the run—he stayed in the "Brain" of the defense perfectly. THE EQUALIZER FACTOR: This exact phase of play led to the 75th-minute equalizer by Kamogelo Sebelebele. While Makgopa was the "Thunder" target for the cross, the ball actually fell to Sebelebele after a partial clearance/block. Since Makgopa was onside during the initial pass, the goal was 100% "Masterpiece" legal. THE APPOLLIS CONFUSION: Don't let the "Wind" of the earlier controversy fool you! Many fans are confusing this with the Oswin Appollis goal that was correctly ruled offside in the 19th minute. Makgopa’s positioning throughout the second half was "Locked In" and clinical. THE "PHANTOM" WAS LEGAL. Makgopa might be the "Grootman" of scoring against Chiefs, but in this specific picture and the video, he played by the rules to "Fix The Country" of the scoreline. The goal stood, the points were shared, and the "Project 2026" title race just got even more "Thunder"ous! 🔥 KHOSI NATION & THE GHOST, now that the "Brain" data confirms Makgopa was onside for the equalizer buildup, do you think Chiefs’ defense "dribbled" themselves by dropping too deep, or was the Pirates' pressure simply too "Locked In" to stop? 🇿🇦🤔💭 #EvidenceMakgopa #SowetoDerby #OffsideAudit

MrksPSLClub

17,913 次观看 • 4 个月前

The 1-0 goal against IFK Göteborg on Monday that kick-started our gold celebrations. A goal that shows how far we have come as group. 14 passes before a finish from one of the two central defenders that has moved all the way up into the box. I love the fluidity and creativity.

The 1-0 goal against IFK Göteborg on Monday that kick-started our gold celebrations. A goal that shows how far we have come as group. 14 passes before a finish from one of the two central defenders that has moved all the way up into the box. I love the fluidity and creativity.

Karl Marius Aksum

36,104 次观看 • 11 个月前

First clip i am showing from yesterday is the first goal. Now, Wednesday were doing ok before the goal. Battling hard, winning second balls and getting up the pitch. The Svante chance, our best one, was on 4 mins. The first goal ended the contest, and whilst Valery is the main culprit for losing the ball, it came from a chance to get the ball forward for us that we lost. When the ball comes out to Fusire on the right, there is great chance for a quick attack as united are 2vs2 in the final third. Svante & Ugbo should both run to the right side and work the channel. But Svante barely moves and Ugbo runs away from the ball. We end up going back, losing it and conceding. SUFC had 10 shots all game. We gave the ball away 6 times out of the 10 shots. They did not have to work for anything after this moment in the game. It is a Sheffield Derby, you have to simply play the occasion and get it forward and build chances. The difference between Sheffield United and Sheffield Wednesday in the last so many derbies is that we play it like it is just another game and employ the same tactics, whereas SUFC play it as a derby match.

First clip i am showing from yesterday is the first goal. Now, Wednesday were doing ok before the goal. Battling hard, winning second balls and getting up the pitch. The Svante chance, our best one, was on 4 mins. The first goal ended the contest, and whilst Valery is the main culprit for losing the ball, it came from a chance to get the ball forward for us that we lost. When the ball comes out to Fusire on the right, there is great chance for a quick attack as united are 2vs2 in the final third. Svante & Ugbo should both run to the right side and work the channel. But Svante barely moves and Ugbo runs away from the ball. We end up going back, losing it and conceding. SUFC had 10 shots all game. We gave the ball away 6 times out of the 10 shots. They did not have to work for anything after this moment in the game. It is a Sheffield Derby, you have to simply play the occasion and get it forward and build chances. The difference between Sheffield United and Sheffield Wednesday in the last so many derbies is that we play it like it is just another game and employ the same tactics, whereas SUFC play it as a derby match.

TW Football

79,359 次观看 • 10 个月前

xG & Cerny (SPFL Only) Vaclav Cerny & Rangers seem to take a huge proportion of shots from "Outside the Box" from "Low xG" scenarios. xG is only an average result on that scenario on the pitch e.g. Cerny xG from 25yards will not be the same as Nico Raskin Cerny this season has taken(SPFL Only): - 16 Shots from Outside the Box - Average xG of 0.03 (100 Shots would reward 3 Goals) - Cerny has scored 2 of the 16 All that means at a High-Level, as it stands, when Cerny has a 0.03 Probability from "Outside the Box" he is actually closer to 0.12 making him 4 times more likely to score in that scenario. The issue at Rangers is all players are given the same freedom from outside the box: - Bajrami 9 Shots = 0 Goals - Diomande 7 Shots = 0 Goals - Hagi 6 Shots = 0 Goals - Raskin 7 Shots = 0 Goals - etc Potentially having a model closer to Brentford for the "Extra Pass" for the "Easy Goal" & allowing Cerny to be the exception might work better...

xG & Cerny (SPFL Only) Vaclav Cerny & Rangers seem to take a huge proportion of shots from "Outside the Box" from "Low xG" scenarios. xG is only an average result on that scenario on the pitch e.g. Cerny xG from 25yards will not be the same as Nico Raskin Cerny this season has taken(SPFL Only): - 16 Shots from Outside the Box - Average xG of 0.03 (100 Shots would reward 3 Goals) - Cerny has scored 2 of the 16 All that means at a High-Level, as it stands, when Cerny has a 0.03 Probability from "Outside the Box" he is actually closer to 0.12 making him 4 times more likely to score in that scenario. The issue at Rangers is all players are given the same freedom from outside the box: - Bajrami 9 Shots = 0 Goals - Diomande 7 Shots = 0 Goals - Hagi 6 Shots = 0 Goals - Raskin 7 Shots = 0 Goals - etc Potentially having a model closer to Brentford for the "Extra Pass" for the "Easy Goal" & allowing Cerny to be the exception might work better...

John Walker

27,028 次观看 • 1 年前

Corentin Moutet was leading 6–0, 5–0. Then he missed a volley, hit the net… and broke it. His mother’s reaction? She went straight to the referee and asked for her own son to be disqualified. 😂 The only problem: by the time she came back, Corentin had already fixed the net and won the match. “I could behave badly… but if I won, it was fine.” A very Moutet story. 😅

Corentin Moutet was leading 6–0, 5–0. Then he missed a volley, hit the net… and broke it. His mother’s reaction? She went straight to the referee and asked for her own son to be disqualified. 😂 The only problem: by the time she came back, Corentin had already fixed the net and won the match. “I could behave badly… but if I won, it was fine.” A very Moutet story. 😅

Tennis Insider Club

103,730 次观看 • 2 个月前

🗣| Dalot’s moment against Wolves yesterday honestly sums up one of the biggest problems at Manchester United right now. When Mosquera completely misjudged that header and sent it straight towards his own post, it was chaos in the box. The kind of situation where you smell a goal before it even happens. Dalot saw it too. You could tell by his body language. He started celebrating before the ball had even crossed the line. But here’s the part that hurts. He also clearly saw the Wolves goalkeeper charging out to recover. Instead of reacting, instead of rushing him, blocking his line, doing anything to make sure that ball goes in, Dalot just stood there, frozen in assumption. Seconds later, the keeper clears it off the line. That should’ve been a winning goal. Dalot was in the perfect position to make the difference. A half-second sprint, one aggressive movement, and the ball is in the net. Instead, he chose celebration over responsibility. And this is the real problem with too many United players right now. They don’t give 100% in the decisive moments. They assume, they admire, they switch off. And that lack of edge is what keeps costing us games. You have to fight until the ball is in the back of the net, not until you think it is.

🗣| Dalot’s moment against Wolves yesterday honestly sums up one of the biggest problems at Manchester United right now. When Mosquera completely misjudged that header and sent it straight towards his own post, it was chaos in the box. The kind of situation where you smell a goal before it even happens. Dalot saw it too. You could tell by his body language. He started celebrating before the ball had even crossed the line. But here’s the part that hurts. He also clearly saw the Wolves goalkeeper charging out to recover. Instead of reacting, instead of rushing him, blocking his line, doing anything to make sure that ball goes in, Dalot just stood there, frozen in assumption. Seconds later, the keeper clears it off the line. That should’ve been a winning goal. Dalot was in the perfect position to make the difference. A half-second sprint, one aggressive movement, and the ball is in the net. Instead, he chose celebration over responsibility. And this is the real problem with too many United players right now. They don’t give 100% in the decisive moments. They assume, they admire, they switch off. And that lack of edge is what keeps costing us games. You have to fight until the ball is in the back of the net, not until you think it is.

Mufc Yuto

2,635,413 次观看 • 8 个月前