正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Sam Altman just got sued by Apple. And that's not even his biggest problem this year!! His own co-founder, Elon Musk, spent two years trying to prove in court that Altman betrayed him. 😯 Now Apple says OpenAI stole its secrets too. Two billion-dollar wars. One CEO in the...

TruthTrumpPost's profile picture

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

700,824 subscribers

658,019 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治喜剧
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk
0:31

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk

Eric Daugherty

701,915 次观看 • 4 个月前

The case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman starts TODAY Jury selection begins today Monday, April 27 in federal court in Oakland, California Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman for betraying the original mission of OpenAi being a nonprofit after providing 60% of the seed funding to begin the company “The two were founding co-chairs of OpenAI years ago. Musk says he gave OpenAI $38 million during its early years, or what he says was 60% of the non-profit's seed funding. Now Musk, who also runs the AI startup called XAI Claims. Altman and others took his money and betrayed OpenAI's original non-profit status. In October, OpenAI finished restructuring with the for-profit organization reporting into a non-profit foundation” “But Altman's side says Musk agreed with them years ago about the need to convert OpenAI into a for-profit company” (VERY likely a lie) Scam Altman went from nonprofit to -> maximum profit Opening arguments are expected to begin tomorrow
2:06

The case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman starts TODAY Jury selection begins today Monday, April 27 in federal court in Oakland, California Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman for betraying the original mission of OpenAi being a nonprofit after providing 60% of the seed funding to begin the company “The two were founding co-chairs of OpenAI years ago. Musk says he gave OpenAI $38 million during its early years, or what he says was 60% of the non-profit's seed funding. Now Musk, who also runs the AI startup called XAI Claims. Altman and others took his money and betrayed OpenAI's original non-profit status. In October, OpenAI finished restructuring with the for-profit organization reporting into a non-profit foundation” “But Altman's side says Musk agreed with them years ago about the need to convert OpenAI into a for-profit company” (VERY likely a lie) Scam Altman went from nonprofit to -> maximum profit Opening arguments are expected to begin tomorrow

Wall Street Apes

19,516 次观看 • 4 个月前

BREAKING: Elon Musk has LOST his landmark lawsuit against OpenAI after a California jury determined that the statute of limitations had run out on his key claims. CNN: “[The jury] found that Elon Musk waited too long to bring this case against OpenAI and Sam Altman... OpenAI transitioned to this for-profit structure 5 years ago; the statute of limitations was 3 years ago.” The trial centered on Musk’s accusations that OpenAI betrayed its original nonprofit mission — which he helped found and fund with tens of millions — by shifting to a for-profit model. Musk was seeking up to $150B in damages, OpenAI to shift back to a non-profit, and for Sam Altman to lose his job.
1:44

BREAKING: Elon Musk has LOST his landmark lawsuit against OpenAI after a California jury determined that the statute of limitations had run out on his key claims. CNN: “[The jury] found that Elon Musk waited too long to bring this case against OpenAI and Sam Altman... OpenAI transitioned to this for-profit structure 5 years ago; the statute of limitations was 3 years ago.” The trial centered on Musk’s accusations that OpenAI betrayed its original nonprofit mission — which he helped found and fund with tens of millions — by shifting to a for-profit model. Musk was seeking up to $150B in damages, OpenAI to shift back to a non-profit, and for Sam Altman to lose his job.

RedWave Press

14,341 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 BOOM! ELON MUSK TORCHES SAM ALTMAN AND OPENAI IN COURT! Elon is wrapping up his testimony today. He co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit to benefit humanity… and now he’s exposing how they completely betrayed that mission. Musk dropped the hammer: He feels like a “fool” for donating $38 million that helped build this now $800 billion monster — all while they ditched the nonprofit promise and went full profit-driven. Classic Silicon Valley betrayal.
0:28

🚨 BOOM! ELON MUSK TORCHES SAM ALTMAN AND OPENAI IN COURT! Elon is wrapping up his testimony today. He co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit to benefit humanity… and now he’s exposing how they completely betrayed that mission. Musk dropped the hammer: He feels like a “fool” for donating $38 million that helped build this now $800 billion monster — all while they ditched the nonprofit promise and went full profit-driven. Classic Silicon Valley betrayal.

Gunther Eagleman™

89,694 次观看 • 4 个月前

The two most powerful men in AI are in a courtroom right now here’s everything you need to know: 2015: musk and altman co-found OpenAI promise: nonprofit. for humanity. forever. musk invested $38 million 2018: musk tries to take control. altman says no. musk leaves. 2026: OpenAI valued at $852 billion. IPO coming. musk: “scam altman stole a charity. full stop.” altman: “christmas in april 🎄” opening statements happening right now in oakland altman. brockman. satya nadella. all testifying. the judge already told them to stop posting on x this morning they didn’t listen 26 claims. dropped to 2 the future of the most powerful AI company ever built decided by 9 jurors in oakland I’ll be watching
3:11

The two most powerful men in AI are in a courtroom right now here’s everything you need to know: 2015: musk and altman co-found OpenAI promise: nonprofit. for humanity. forever. musk invested $38 million 2018: musk tries to take control. altman says no. musk leaves. 2026: OpenAI valued at $852 billion. IPO coming. musk: “scam altman stole a charity. full stop.” altman: “christmas in april 🎄” opening statements happening right now in oakland altman. brockman. satya nadella. all testifying. the judge already told them to stop posting on x this morning they didn’t listen 26 claims. dropped to 2 the future of the most powerful AI company ever built decided by 9 jurors in oakland I’ll be watching

Mika

22,323 次观看 • 4 个月前

ELON MUSK JUST EXPLAINED WHY HE DOESN’T TRUST SAM ALTMAN. “I’m not a fan of Sam Altman.” Musk says OpenAI was supposed to be a nonprofit, open-source AI company owned by the world. Instead, he argues it became an ~$800 billion for-profit company with closed-source AI. His point? “If you donated money for one mission, then watched it become the exact opposite, wouldn’t you question it?” “That’s my issue, and I think it’s a legitimate one.” Musk also claims Anthropic exists because its founders didn’t trust Altman enough to stay at OpenAI. His conclusion: “Otherwise, Anthropic wouldn’t exist.” That’s a serious accusation.
1:08

ELON MUSK JUST EXPLAINED WHY HE DOESN’T TRUST SAM ALTMAN. “I’m not a fan of Sam Altman.” Musk says OpenAI was supposed to be a nonprofit, open-source AI company owned by the world. Instead, he argues it became an ~$800 billion for-profit company with closed-source AI. His point? “If you donated money for one mission, then watched it become the exact opposite, wouldn’t you question it?” “That’s my issue, and I think it’s a legitimate one.” Musk also claims Anthropic exists because its founders didn’t trust Altman enough to stay at OpenAI. His conclusion: “Otherwise, Anthropic wouldn’t exist.” That’s a serious accusation.

Ryan Carter

29,285 次观看 • 1 天前

Elon Musk offered $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI, and Sam Altman answered in under 60 minutes. “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Same digits, 1/10th the price the insult was in the math. Rewind to 2015, when Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit, put in $44 million and sent late-night emails about saving humanity. Then he walked. OpenAI took $13 billion from Microsoft, shipped ChatGPT and grew into a $135 billion company without him. Altman wrote him a private email: “I don’t think OpenAI would have happened without you and it really fing hurts when you publicly attack us.” Musk reply came in public instead “Scam Altman,” “Greg Stockman,” and then a lawsuit. In court, OpenAI lawyer handed him a 2018 email from his own inbox, spelling out the plan to raise $10 billion years before he claims he learned of it. Musk, under oath: “I did not read the fine print.” The lawyer: “It’s a 4-page document.” The jury ruled against him unanimously. So count what’s left on the table: a $44 million donation, a $97.4 billion bid dead in an hour, and a $135 billion company run by the man he once mentored. He co-founded the future, then sued it and it won.
5:28

Elon Musk offered $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI, and Sam Altman answered in under 60 minutes. “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Same digits, 1/10th the price the insult was in the math. Rewind to 2015, when Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit, put in $44 million and sent late-night emails about saving humanity. Then he walked. OpenAI took $13 billion from Microsoft, shipped ChatGPT and grew into a $135 billion company without him. Altman wrote him a private email: “I don’t think OpenAI would have happened without you and it really fing hurts when you publicly attack us.” Musk reply came in public instead “Scam Altman,” “Greg Stockman,” and then a lawsuit. In court, OpenAI lawyer handed him a 2018 email from his own inbox, spelling out the plan to raise $10 billion years before he claims he learned of it. Musk, under oath: “I did not read the fine print.” The lawyer: “It’s a 4-page document.” The jury ruled against him unanimously. So count what’s left on the table: a $44 million donation, a $97.4 billion bid dead in an hour, and a $135 billion company run by the man he once mentored. He co-founded the future, then sued it and it won.

West Lord

4,444,910 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."
1:25

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."

DogeDesigner

240,735 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Stop scrolling.. Let me explain what Sam Altman just pulled off. > Microsoft gave OpenAI $13 billion.. Biggest AI bet in history. OpenAI ran exclusively on Azure. > Then Sam got fired by his own board nd the whole world watched. > He talked his way back in. Fired the board instead and Restructured OpenAI from nonprofit to for-profit. > Then signed a $50 billion cloud deal with Amazon. Microsoft's biggest competitor.. using Microsoft's money to build the product Amazon's now selling. > Now Microsoft is lawyering up. This man got fired on a Friday, came back on a Monday, took $13 billion from Microsoft, flipped the entire company structure, and then handed the keys to Amazon. Sam Altman is running a masterclass in how to finesse a trillion dollar company with a straight face.
0:31

🚨 Stop scrolling.. Let me explain what Sam Altman just pulled off. > Microsoft gave OpenAI $13 billion.. Biggest AI bet in history. OpenAI ran exclusively on Azure. > Then Sam got fired by his own board nd the whole world watched. > He talked his way back in. Fired the board instead and Restructured OpenAI from nonprofit to for-profit. > Then signed a $50 billion cloud deal with Amazon. Microsoft's biggest competitor.. using Microsoft's money to build the product Amazon's now selling. > Now Microsoft is lawyering up. This man got fired on a Friday, came back on a Monday, took $13 billion from Microsoft, flipped the entire company structure, and then handed the keys to Amazon. Sam Altman is running a masterclass in how to finesse a trillion dollar company with a straight face.

Tuki

100,703 次观看 • 5 个月前

Just Happened! A US jury finds OpenAI CEO Sam Altman not liable to Elon Musk for straying from its charitable mission. "This is the reason given that we're seeing reporting that Musk waited too long to sue." This is a big loss for Elon, and a big win for OpenAI. Competition in the AI space is really starting to heat up. I can only imagine there will be a few big winners.
0:52

Just Happened! A US jury finds OpenAI CEO Sam Altman not liable to Elon Musk for straying from its charitable mission. "This is the reason given that we're seeing reporting that Musk waited too long to sue." This is a big loss for Elon, and a big win for OpenAI. Competition in the AI space is really starting to heat up. I can only imagine there will be a few big winners.

Ed Krassenstein

73,986 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk sat next to Sam Altman in 2016 and praised the nonprofit they built to keep AI out of the hands of a few. Altman ran the camera. He asked how the 6-month-old company was going. Musk called it a talented team. A 501c3. A charity to democratize AI "so it doesn't get concentrated in the hands of a few." That was the whole pitch. Keep it open. Keep it shared. Keep it out of any single grip. 10 years later, that charity is worth over $800B and filing for a $1T IPO. The nonprofit grew a for-profit arm. Microsoft took a stake. Altman ran all of it. In 2024, Musk sued for $150B . He wanted Altman removed and the structure torn down for breaking the exact promise he watched him make on camera. On May 18, 2026, a jury threw it out in under 2 hours. Filed too late, they ruled. Now he calls him "Scam Altman." 3 days ago Apple sued OpenAI. Musk piled on. Altman's reply: the surest sign his model is winning is that Elon is obsessed with him again. 2 co-founders. 1 charity. 11 years. They filmed the whole thing themselves.
19:32

Elon Musk sat next to Sam Altman in 2016 and praised the nonprofit they built to keep AI out of the hands of a few. Altman ran the camera. He asked how the 6-month-old company was going. Musk called it a talented team. A 501c3. A charity to democratize AI "so it doesn't get concentrated in the hands of a few." That was the whole pitch. Keep it open. Keep it shared. Keep it out of any single grip. 10 years later, that charity is worth over $800B and filing for a $1T IPO. The nonprofit grew a for-profit arm. Microsoft took a stake. Altman ran all of it. In 2024, Musk sued for $150B . He wanted Altman removed and the structure torn down for breaking the exact promise he watched him make on camera. On May 18, 2026, a jury threw it out in under 2 hours. Filed too late, they ruled. Now he calls him "Scam Altman." 3 days ago Apple sued OpenAI. Musk piled on. Altman's reply: the surest sign his model is winning is that Elon is obsessed with him again. 2 co-founders. 1 charity. 11 years. They filmed the whole thing themselves.

Veltrx

65,158 次观看 • 2 个月前

This AI whistleblower just EXPOSED Sam Altman for manipulating his way into becoming OpenAI’s CEO. Everyone who helped him build it has left because they felt used. Karen Hao interviewed 300 people including 90 current and former OpenAI employees. And she just told Steven Bartlett what she discovered: In 2015, Altman needed Elon Musk to co-found OpenAI. Problem was, Musk was obsessed with AI as an existential threat. So Altman wrote a blog post calling AI "probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity." Before that blog post? Altman's biggest fear was engineered viruses. Not AI. He literally rewrote his worldview overnight to mirror Musk's language word for word. Musk bought in. Donated millions. Co-founded the company. Then Altman stabbed him in the back. When OpenAI needed a CEO for its new for-profit arm, the co-founders Ilia Sutskever and Greg Brockman initially chose Musk. Altman went directly to Brockman, a personal friend, and said: "Do we really want someone this erratic and unpredictable to control a technology that could be super powerful?" Brockman flipped. Then convinced Ilia to flip. Musk found out he wasn't getting the role and left. That's how the biggest rivalry in tech actually started. Not over ideology... Over a backroom power play. But here's where it gets darker: Every single person who built OpenAI alongside Altman eventually felt the same thing Musk felt. Used. Manipulated. Discarded. Dario Amodei, VP of Research, thought Altman shared his vision. Over time he realized Altman was on "exactly the opposite page" and had used his intelligence to build things he fundamentally disagreed with. He left and founded Anthropic. Ilia Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist, tried to get Altman fired. He told colleagues: "I don't think Sam is the guy who should have the finger on the button for AGI." He was pushed outounded Safe Super Intelligence. That name alone tells you everything. Mira Murati, CTO, left and started Thinking Machines Lab. No other tech company in history has had every single co-builder leave and start a direct competitor. Not Google. Not Meta. Not Apple. NOBODY. 300 interviews exposed one consistent pattern: If you align with Altman's vision, you think he's the Steve Jobs of AI. If you don't, you feel like you were manipulated by someone who will say whatever is needed to whoever is listening. When talking to Congress? AGI will cure cancer and solve poverty. When talking to consumers? It's the best digital assistant you'll ever have. When talking to Microsoft? AGI is a system that generates $100 billion in revenue. Three completely different definitions of the same technology sold to three completely different audiences. And if you publicly disagree with any of it? OpenAI subpoenaed 7 nonprofit organizations that criticized them. Sent a sheriff to a 29yo nonprofit lawyer's door during dinner demanding every text, email, and document he'd ever sent about OpenAI. A one-man watchdog nonprofit got papers demanding all communications with anyone who questioned the company. OpenAI's own head of mission alignment publicly said "this doesn't seem great." That's the guy whose literal job is making sure OpenAI BENEFITS humanity. Former employees who spoke up about secret non-disparagement clauses that threatened to strip their equity described the psychological pressure as "crushing." This is the company that tells us it's building technology "for the benefit of humanity." Same company that mirrors whatever language gets them funded. Same company where every builder eventually walks away feeling deceived. Same company sending law enforcement to silence critics. The biggest AI company on Earth wasn't built on technology. It was built on one man's ability to tell everyone exactly what they needed to hear. And the scariest part is that it worked.
3:09

This AI whistleblower just EXPOSED Sam Altman for manipulating his way into becoming OpenAI’s CEO. Everyone who helped him build it has left because they felt used. Karen Hao interviewed 300 people including 90 current and former OpenAI employees. And she just told Steven Bartlett what she discovered: In 2015, Altman needed Elon Musk to co-found OpenAI. Problem was, Musk was obsessed with AI as an existential threat. So Altman wrote a blog post calling AI "probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity." Before that blog post? Altman's biggest fear was engineered viruses. Not AI. He literally rewrote his worldview overnight to mirror Musk's language word for word. Musk bought in. Donated millions. Co-founded the company. Then Altman stabbed him in the back. When OpenAI needed a CEO for its new for-profit arm, the co-founders Ilia Sutskever and Greg Brockman initially chose Musk. Altman went directly to Brockman, a personal friend, and said: "Do we really want someone this erratic and unpredictable to control a technology that could be super powerful?" Brockman flipped. Then convinced Ilia to flip. Musk found out he wasn't getting the role and left. That's how the biggest rivalry in tech actually started. Not over ideology... Over a backroom power play. But here's where it gets darker: Every single person who built OpenAI alongside Altman eventually felt the same thing Musk felt. Used. Manipulated. Discarded. Dario Amodei, VP of Research, thought Altman shared his vision. Over time he realized Altman was on "exactly the opposite page" and had used his intelligence to build things he fundamentally disagreed with. He left and founded Anthropic. Ilia Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist, tried to get Altman fired. He told colleagues: "I don't think Sam is the guy who should have the finger on the button for AGI." He was pushed outounded Safe Super Intelligence. That name alone tells you everything. Mira Murati, CTO, left and started Thinking Machines Lab. No other tech company in history has had every single co-builder leave and start a direct competitor. Not Google. Not Meta. Not Apple. NOBODY. 300 interviews exposed one consistent pattern: If you align with Altman's vision, you think he's the Steve Jobs of AI. If you don't, you feel like you were manipulated by someone who will say whatever is needed to whoever is listening. When talking to Congress? AGI will cure cancer and solve poverty. When talking to consumers? It's the best digital assistant you'll ever have. When talking to Microsoft? AGI is a system that generates $100 billion in revenue. Three completely different definitions of the same technology sold to three completely different audiences. And if you publicly disagree with any of it? OpenAI subpoenaed 7 nonprofit organizations that criticized them. Sent a sheriff to a 29yo nonprofit lawyer's door during dinner demanding every text, email, and document he'd ever sent about OpenAI. A one-man watchdog nonprofit got papers demanding all communications with anyone who questioned the company. OpenAI's own head of mission alignment publicly said "this doesn't seem great." That's the guy whose literal job is making sure OpenAI BENEFITS humanity. Former employees who spoke up about secret non-disparagement clauses that threatened to strip their equity described the psychological pressure as "crushing." This is the company that tells us it's building technology "for the benefit of humanity." Same company that mirrors whatever language gets them funded. Same company where every builder eventually walks away feeling deceived. Same company sending law enforcement to silence critics. The biggest AI company on Earth wasn't built on technology. It was built on one man's ability to tell everyone exactly what they needed to hear. And the scariest part is that it worked.

Ricardo

385,844 次观看 • 5 个月前

Google just STOLE Apple away from OpenAI... And it might decide who wins the AI race. Apple announced a multi-year $1 billion deal with Google to power the next generation of Siri using Gemini AI. Not ChatGPT. Gemini. This is the same Apple that 18 months ago announced a partnership with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into iPhones. Everyone thought that meant OpenAI won. Turns out it was an audition. And OpenAI failed. Here's why: June 2024: Apple announces OpenAI partnership. Sam Altman tweets: "very happy to be partnering with apple." Media declares OpenAI the winner of the AI race. December 2025: Sam Altman issues "code red" at OpenAI. Tells everyone to pause everything and ship ChatGPT 5.2 faster. Why the panic? Google released Gemini 3 and it was actually good. January 2026: Apple picks Google. ChatGPT stays as an "optional feature" for complicated queries. But Gemini becomes the DEFAULT intelligence layer for 2 billion Apple devices. The financial reality: Apple pays OpenAI $0 But Apple pays Google $1 BILLION per year That's a verdict. The excuse OpenAI gave for why they did it for free was "exposure to millions of iPhone users." Which basically means "we couldn't negotiate worth shit." Meanwhile Google walked away with both the money AND the distribution. Why Google won: Infrastructure ownership. OpenAI runs on Microsoft's Azure cloud. That creates a dependency chain: Apple → OpenAI → Microsoft. 3 companies. 3 points of failure. Google owns its entire stack. One relationship. Zero middlemen. Apple's statement said Google's technology provides "the most capable foundation." Not "most innovative." Not "best partner." Most CAPABLE. In other words, OpenAI's tech couldn't handle the scale. The Alphabet boost: Google's stock hit $4 trillion market cap after the announcement. Up 65% in 2024 on AI momentum alone. This deal validates Google's pivot from "search company" to "AI infrastructure company." Now they power Samsung's Galaxy AI AND Apple's Siri. Billions of mobile devices running on Gemini. OpenAI's big problem here: Still no profit. Ever. Anthropic is stealing enterprise customers. DeepSeek launched a price war forcing ChatGPT to cut prices. GPT-5 was overhyped and underwhelming. Circular financing deals are getting scrutinized. And now Apple just downgraded them from partner to backup option. That "code red" in December? Too little, too late. The reality everyone's missing: This isn't about chatbot quality. It's about who owns the infrastructure to power billions of devices. Google proved it with Samsung. Now Apple. OpenAI proved it can build a viral product but can't scale it profitably. Very different skill sets. Elon called it "unreasonable concentration of power for Google." He's right. But that's exactly why Apple chose them. Apple doesn't want a startup partner. They want a utility provider. Google is now the default AI for Android AND iOS. OpenAI is relegated to opt-in queries for people who specifically request ChatGPT. That's the difference between infrastructure and feature. The next 12 months: Apple launches Gemini-powered Siri in spring 2026. If it works, every iPhone user defaults to Google's AI. ChatGPT becomes the thing people use when Siri can't answer. The backup plan. My takeaway for entrepreneurs watching this: Distribution beats innovation. Google didn't necessarily build a better chatbot. They built better infrastructure and negotiated better terms. OpenAI won the hype race. Google won the business war. What do you think can save OpenAI now?
1:19

Google just STOLE Apple away from OpenAI... And it might decide who wins the AI race. Apple announced a multi-year $1 billion deal with Google to power the next generation of Siri using Gemini AI. Not ChatGPT. Gemini. This is the same Apple that 18 months ago announced a partnership with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into iPhones. Everyone thought that meant OpenAI won. Turns out it was an audition. And OpenAI failed. Here's why: June 2024: Apple announces OpenAI partnership. Sam Altman tweets: "very happy to be partnering with apple." Media declares OpenAI the winner of the AI race. December 2025: Sam Altman issues "code red" at OpenAI. Tells everyone to pause everything and ship ChatGPT 5.2 faster. Why the panic? Google released Gemini 3 and it was actually good. January 2026: Apple picks Google. ChatGPT stays as an "optional feature" for complicated queries. But Gemini becomes the DEFAULT intelligence layer for 2 billion Apple devices. The financial reality: Apple pays OpenAI $0 But Apple pays Google $1 BILLION per year That's a verdict. The excuse OpenAI gave for why they did it for free was "exposure to millions of iPhone users." Which basically means "we couldn't negotiate worth shit." Meanwhile Google walked away with both the money AND the distribution. Why Google won: Infrastructure ownership. OpenAI runs on Microsoft's Azure cloud. That creates a dependency chain: Apple → OpenAI → Microsoft. 3 companies. 3 points of failure. Google owns its entire stack. One relationship. Zero middlemen. Apple's statement said Google's technology provides "the most capable foundation." Not "most innovative." Not "best partner." Most CAPABLE. In other words, OpenAI's tech couldn't handle the scale. The Alphabet boost: Google's stock hit $4 trillion market cap after the announcement. Up 65% in 2024 on AI momentum alone. This deal validates Google's pivot from "search company" to "AI infrastructure company." Now they power Samsung's Galaxy AI AND Apple's Siri. Billions of mobile devices running on Gemini. OpenAI's big problem here: Still no profit. Ever. Anthropic is stealing enterprise customers. DeepSeek launched a price war forcing ChatGPT to cut prices. GPT-5 was overhyped and underwhelming. Circular financing deals are getting scrutinized. And now Apple just downgraded them from partner to backup option. That "code red" in December? Too little, too late. The reality everyone's missing: This isn't about chatbot quality. It's about who owns the infrastructure to power billions of devices. Google proved it with Samsung. Now Apple. OpenAI proved it can build a viral product but can't scale it profitably. Very different skill sets. Elon called it "unreasonable concentration of power for Google." He's right. But that's exactly why Apple chose them. Apple doesn't want a startup partner. They want a utility provider. Google is now the default AI for Android AND iOS. OpenAI is relegated to opt-in queries for people who specifically request ChatGPT. That's the difference between infrastructure and feature. The next 12 months: Apple launches Gemini-powered Siri in spring 2026. If it works, every iPhone user defaults to Google's AI. ChatGPT becomes the thing people use when Siri can't answer. The backup plan. My takeaway for entrepreneurs watching this: Distribution beats innovation. Google didn't necessarily build a better chatbot. They built better infrastructure and negotiated better terms. OpenAI won the hype race. Google won the business war. What do you think can save OpenAI now?

Ricardo

50,741 次观看 • 8 个月前

How To Build The Future: Sam Altman At OpenAI, Sam Altman and his team have overseen major leaps forward in machine learning, generative AI, and, most recently, LLMs that can reason at PhD levels. And this is just the beginning— in his latest essay Sam predicted that ASI is just a few thousand days away. In this episode of our rebooted series "How To Build The Future," Garry Tan sits down with Sam to talk about the origins of OpenAI, what’s next for the company, and what advice he has for founders navigating this massive platform shift.
0:46

How To Build The Future: Sam Altman At OpenAI, Sam Altman and his team have overseen major leaps forward in machine learning, generative AI, and, most recently, LLMs that can reason at PhD levels. And this is just the beginning— in his latest essay Sam predicted that ASI is just a few thousand days away. In this episode of our rebooted series "How To Build The Future," Garry Tan sits down with Sam to talk about the origins of OpenAI, what’s next for the company, and what advice he has for founders navigating this massive platform shift.

Y Combinator

148,629 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Do you understand what SCAM ALTMAN has been doing? He made a crypto called Worldcoin that scans your eyeballs with a metal orb in exchange for tokens. The token hit $11.74 in 2024. Today $WLD is $0.28. Down 97%. His foundation dumped $65 million worth last week at $0.27 each. In Kenya they found the project exploiting extreme poverty to get people to scan their eyes for worthless crypto. In Berlin gangs were forcing homeless people and refugees to get scanned so they could pocket the rewards. Thailand raided a site and ordered 1.2 million scans deleted. Spain, Portugal, Hong Kong, Germany all banned or investigating. Snowden warned everyone. They say they delete the scans. They don't. They keep the digital fingerprint of your eyes forever in a privately owned database. In 2015 Elon Musk gave $38 million to co-found OpenAI with Altman. The deal was clear. Keep it nonprofit. Keep it open source. Build AI for humanity. Altman took the money. Turned it into a closed source for-profit company valued at $840 billion. Microsoft got 27%. Musk didn't see a dollar. Musk tried buying it back for $97.4 billion. Altman said on camera "no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion." Asked about Musk in an interview he said "his whole life is from a position of insecurity. I don't think he's a happy person." Called the lawsuit "this week's episode." He's also investing in his own chip company that sells chips to OpenAI. Investing in energy companies that power OpenAI. Buying from himself. Musk filed a $134 billion lawsuit. Most people called him jealous. Then his lawyers found the personal diary of Greg Brockman, one of the original OpenAI co-founders. A 2017 entry reads "I cannot believe that we committed to non-profit if three months later we're doing b-corp then it was a lie." He admitted the nonprofit promise was never real. Two years before they officially went for-profit. The judge said there's "ample evidence." Sent it to a jury. Trial starts April 27. Musk said he'll donate every dollar to charity. Altman laughed on camera. Called Musk insecure. Called the lawsuit a joke. His own co-founder's diary says the nonprofit was never real. A jury decides in 28 days. Let's see who's laughing after the verdict.
1:06

🚨 Do you understand what SCAM ALTMAN has been doing? He made a crypto called Worldcoin that scans your eyeballs with a metal orb in exchange for tokens. The token hit $11.74 in 2024. Today $WLD is $0.28. Down 97%. His foundation dumped $65 million worth last week at $0.27 each. In Kenya they found the project exploiting extreme poverty to get people to scan their eyes for worthless crypto. In Berlin gangs were forcing homeless people and refugees to get scanned so they could pocket the rewards. Thailand raided a site and ordered 1.2 million scans deleted. Spain, Portugal, Hong Kong, Germany all banned or investigating. Snowden warned everyone. They say they delete the scans. They don't. They keep the digital fingerprint of your eyes forever in a privately owned database. In 2015 Elon Musk gave $38 million to co-found OpenAI with Altman. The deal was clear. Keep it nonprofit. Keep it open source. Build AI for humanity. Altman took the money. Turned it into a closed source for-profit company valued at $840 billion. Microsoft got 27%. Musk didn't see a dollar. Musk tried buying it back for $97.4 billion. Altman said on camera "no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion." Asked about Musk in an interview he said "his whole life is from a position of insecurity. I don't think he's a happy person." Called the lawsuit "this week's episode." He's also investing in his own chip company that sells chips to OpenAI. Investing in energy companies that power OpenAI. Buying from himself. Musk filed a $134 billion lawsuit. Most people called him jealous. Then his lawyers found the personal diary of Greg Brockman, one of the original OpenAI co-founders. A 2017 entry reads "I cannot believe that we committed to non-profit if three months later we're doing b-corp then it was a lie." He admitted the nonprofit promise was never real. Two years before they officially went for-profit. The judge said there's "ample evidence." Sent it to a jury. Trial starts April 27. Musk said he'll donate every dollar to charity. Altman laughed on camera. Called Musk insecure. Called the lawsuit a joke. His own co-founder's diary says the nonprofit was never real. A jury decides in 28 days. Let's see who's laughing after the verdict.

Evan Luthra

823,903 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk just lost his $150 billion lawsuit against OpenAI and his response was to start a flame war with Sam Altman on the app he owns the timeline: > jury needed under 2 hours to throw out the case > musk reposts "Scam Altman is super good at scamming" 17M views > altman fires back: "homeboy you're the one selling public market investors on short-term space datacenters" > musk: "maybe you can come see them if your parole officer approves" two men worth a combined trillion dollars arguing like it's a group chat at 2am and the actual question did OpenAI betray its nonprofit mission was never even ruled on, the case died on a statute of limitations technicality who's winning this exchange so far?
9:37

Elon Musk just lost his $150 billion lawsuit against OpenAI and his response was to start a flame war with Sam Altman on the app he owns the timeline: > jury needed under 2 hours to throw out the case > musk reposts "Scam Altman is super good at scamming" 17M views > altman fires back: "homeboy you're the one selling public market investors on short-term space datacenters" > musk: "maybe you can come see them if your parole officer approves" two men worth a combined trillion dollars arguing like it's a group chat at 2am and the actual question did OpenAI betray its nonprofit mission was never even ruled on, the case died on a statute of limitations technicality who's winning this exchange so far?

West Lord

11,951 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon: I don’t trust Sam Altman or OpenAI "I started that company as a nonprofit, open-source organization. I named it OpenAI for a reason. And now it is extremely closed source and focused on maximizing profit… At various points, Sam has claimed not to be getting rich, but he’s claimed many things that were false… So I don’t trust Sam Altman, and I don’t think we want the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.” @slow_developer
0:58

Elon: I don’t trust Sam Altman or OpenAI "I started that company as a nonprofit, open-source organization. I named it OpenAI for a reason. And now it is extremely closed source and focused on maximizing profit… At various points, Sam has claimed not to be getting rich, but he’s claimed many things that were false… So I don’t trust Sam Altman, and I don’t think we want the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.” @slow_developer

Mario Nawfal

258,825 次观看 • 4 个月前

26-year old OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji, who accused the company of violating copyright law, has been found dead in an apparent suicide. Below is a screenshot of his last post on X. Elon Musk on OpenAI: “I don't trust OpenAI. I started OpenAI as a non-profit open source. I named the company. It used to be open source but now it is extremely closed source and maximally profit.” “I don't trust Sam Altman and I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.”
1:10

26-year old OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji, who accused the company of violating copyright law, has been found dead in an apparent suicide. Below is a screenshot of his last post on X. Elon Musk on OpenAI: “I don't trust OpenAI. I started OpenAI as a non-profit open source. I named the company. It used to be open source but now it is extremely closed source and maximally profit.” “I don't trust Sam Altman and I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.”

J Stewart

52,067 次观看 • 1 年前