Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Sam Altman of OpenAI is getting extremely desperate. Ever since China launched DeepSeek, his investors have realized he basically flushed their US$18 BILLION down the toilet! Now he's pressuring the US gov't to ban DeepSeek, LOL!

106,640 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Kevin James Ng
Kevin James Ngvor 1 Jahr

Awesome Reporting Andy.. there are many more of China's 🇨🇳 Deepseek's like China's NEV far extremely superior extremely affordable high quality.

Profilbild von Nigam Arora
Nigam Aroravor 1 Jahr

FOR PRUDENT INVESTORS ONLY ChatGPT has unleashed the golden age of AI. Many investors will make a fortune from AI stocks. Get the list of 18 AI stocks to grab your share of the profits — no cost to you.

Profilbild von Pontius Polycule Pilate of Planet Transdildo
Pontius Polycule Pilate of Planet Transdildovor 1 Jahr

I believe he’s attempting the China playbook Andy. That is, ban all apps and software from the US for the last 20 years to boost China’s products

Profilbild von theScientist
theScientistvor 1 Jahr

Oh gawd, it's another one of those TikTok ban moments. Give me a break.

Profilbild von Zach Zen
Zach Zenvor 1 Jahr

At this point, OpenAI should be renamed as open your wallet AI, or renamed as closed AI.

Profilbild von Andreas
Andreasvor 1 Jahr

"AI" always was a scam, though. Including DeepSeek. They are statistics-based verbiage plagiators and are not intelligent at all and can't lead to AGI, since intelligence is the ability to bidirectionally extrapolate object-states on a timeline and understand cause-effect relationships. Building such a (non-NN, non-LLM) system would require many orders of magnitude less computational resources, making AGI in theory attainable to a small startup - as well as infinitely more powerful and useful than a text confabulator.

Profilbild von RealChina🇨🇳
RealChina🇨🇳vor 1 Jahr

What about China’s other AI models?

Profilbild von Willsst
Willsstvor 1 Jahr

I wonder what is his remuneration like... 60 million a year?

Profilbild von DoubleCyee
DoubleCyeevor 1 Jahr

Remember the face that's what fear look like.

Profilbild von Thomas
Thomasvor 1 Jahr

Sam is going to claim DeepSeek steals your data, knowing most politicians don't know what open source is.

Profilbild von Chris Grey
Chris Greyvor 1 Jahr

😂That guy is a total fraud. Musk has been calling him out for years. Grok is also way better than ChatGPT.

Ähnliche Videos

China just made Silicon Valley's entire AI industry look like a scam. The US government spent 3 years trying to stop China from building competitive AI. But this backfired HORRIBLY. Here's what happened: Yesterday, a Chinese startup called DeepSeek released a new AI model called V4. It matches the performance of OpenAI and Anthropic's best models. At 1/7th the price. And for the first time ever, it was built on Chinese chips. NOT American ones. That last part is the one that terrifies the west. For context: Since 2022, the US has banned the export of advanced AI chips to China. The entire strategy was built on the assumption that if China can't access Nvidia's best hardware, they can't build frontier AI. But DeepSeek just proved that assumption wrong. Their V4 model was trained and runs on Huawei's Ascend chips. Huawei spent months working directly with DeepSeek to make sure V4 runs across their entire line of AI processors. Jensen Huang even predicted this on a recent podcast: "The day that DeepSeek comes out on Huawei first, that is a horrible outcome for our nation." That day was yesterday. And the numbers are crazy: DeepSeek V4 costs $3.48 per million output tokens. OpenAI's latest model GPT-5.5 costs $30. Anthropic's Claude charges $25. Same ballpark performance. 7x cheaper. Uber's CTO just admitted they burned through their ENTIRE 2026 AI budget in 4 months using Anthropic's tools. If Uber had used DeepSeek instead, that same budget would have lasted 7 YEARS. 4 months vs 7 years. Same work getting done. But the pricing isn't even the big thing here. The real story is what DeepSeek did with their technical report: They published the benchmarks where they LOSE. Every AI company cherry-picks the tests where their model wins. DeepSeek ran the full comparison against GPT-5.4 and Google's Gemini, found they trail frontier models by 3 to 6 months, and printed it anyway. They literally don't care because the price gap makes the performance gap irrelevant for 90% of use cases. So the US export controls didn't slow China down. They ACCELERATED China's independence. Because Chinese developers were FORCED to train models with limited resources, they had to figure out how to make AI radically more efficient. That constraint became their competitive advantage. Every generation of DeepSeek has gotten dramatically cheaper to train. V4 continues the trend. Meanwhile US companies are going the OPPOSITE direction: OpenAI's GPT-5.5 Pro costs $180 per million output tokens. That's 51x more expensive than DeepSeek V4 for comparable work. The Commerce Secretary confirmed this week that ZERO Nvidia advanced chip shipments have actually gone through to China despite being approved in January. So China built frontier AI anyway. Without American chips. At a fraction of the cost. And the market response tells you everything: Chinese chipmaker SMIC surged 10%. Huahong Semiconductor jumped 15%. DeepSeek's Chinese AI competitors Zhipu AI and MiniMax dropped 9% because V4 is destroying them too. DeepSeek is making Silicon Valley's pricing model look like a scam. US tech companies spent $650 billion on AI infrastructure this year. DeepSeek just showed the world you can match their output for pennies. The export controls were supposed to be America's ace card. Instead they taught China how to win without American chips, at American prices nobody can compete with. Jensen Huang was right. This is a horrible outcome. But it's the outcome America built for itself.

Ricardo

281,190 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten