Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Sam Altman says "code reds" are low-stakes, frequent, and worth the paranoia OpenAI treats competitors' threats like pandemics: act early, not after the panic DeepSeek triggered one earlier this year; Gemini 3 just did too. "we won't be in this code red much longer... usually it's 6 to 8 weeks"

haider1's profile picture

Haider.

68,741 subscribers

232,869 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

OpenAI just leaked a model so powerful it triggered code red. And yes, it’s called Garlic. Here’s the 30-second breakdown so you actually understand why this matters → ✔ Google Gemini 3 crushed OpenAI in benchmarks ✔ ChatGPT usage dropped ✔ Sam Altman paused projects to build “Garlic” ✔ Garlic uses high-density pre-training (smarter + smaller) ✔ Internal memos show it beating Gemini 3 + Claude Opus 4.5 Why this is wild: → Faster than current models → Cheaper to run → Better at reasoning → Better at coding → Could run locally on your phone Save this video, you'll rethink what AI models can do. Want the SOP? DM me. 💬
9:17

OpenAI just leaked a model so powerful it triggered code red. And yes, it’s called Garlic. Here’s the 30-second breakdown so you actually understand why this matters → ✔ Google Gemini 3 crushed OpenAI in benchmarks ✔ ChatGPT usage dropped ✔ Sam Altman paused projects to build “Garlic” ✔ Garlic uses high-density pre-training (smarter + smaller) ✔ Internal memos show it beating Gemini 3 + Claude Opus 4.5 Why this is wild: → Faster than current models → Cheaper to run → Better at reasoning → Better at coding → Could run locally on your phone Save this video, you'll rethink what AI models can do. Want the SOP? DM me. 💬

Julian Goldie SEO

114,491 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

NEW AD: This November, it's not just about a vote, it's about reclaiming what is ours. In 8 states, including AZ, NV, FL, and now MO -- women's reproductive rights are on the ballot. The stakes could not be higher. We won't let them turn back the clock. #WeWontGoBack
1:14

NEW AD: This November, it's not just about a vote, it's about reclaiming what is ours. In 8 states, including AZ, NV, FL, and now MO -- women's reproductive rights are on the ballot. The stakes could not be higher. We won't let them turn back the clock. #WeWontGoBack

The Seneca Project

203,592 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 BREAKING: AI expert Yoshua Bengio just revealed Sam Altman's 'code red' is proof the AI race is now in survival mode. The Financial Times broke it... Sam Altman had declared code red at OpenAI. The same Altman who once called superhuman intelligence the greatest threat to humanity. Google and Anthropic were catching up. Internally, the gloves came off. It wasn't the first code red. Three years earlier, when ChatGPT first shipped, Sergey and Larry had declared code red at Google. Two code reds. Same race. Different incumbents panicking. "It is not a healthy race for all the reasons we've been discussing." "What would be a more healthy scenario is one in which we try to abstract away these commercial pressures." "They're in survival mode, right?" "And think about both the scientific and the societal problems." But the labs couldn't see past the next quarter. In other words: Survival mode killed the scientific question. "They're so obsessed by that race that they don't pay attention to how we might be doing things differently." "Where are they all racing? They're racing towards replacing jobs that people do." "Because there's like quadrillions of dollars to be made by doing that." The pitch was always "AI for medicine. AI for science." The internal memo said something else. Quadrillions, in survival mode, with a second code red on the wall. If you're new here, follow AI Evolution for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Yoshua Bengio ( Yoshua Bengio ), Turing Award–winning AI pioneer and founder of Mila, on Steven Bartlett's ( @SteveBartlettSC ) Diary Of A CEO
1:02

🚨 BREAKING: AI expert Yoshua Bengio just revealed Sam Altman's 'code red' is proof the AI race is now in survival mode. The Financial Times broke it... Sam Altman had declared code red at OpenAI. The same Altman who once called superhuman intelligence the greatest threat to humanity. Google and Anthropic were catching up. Internally, the gloves came off. It wasn't the first code red. Three years earlier, when ChatGPT first shipped, Sergey and Larry had declared code red at Google. Two code reds. Same race. Different incumbents panicking. "It is not a healthy race for all the reasons we've been discussing." "What would be a more healthy scenario is one in which we try to abstract away these commercial pressures." "They're in survival mode, right?" "And think about both the scientific and the societal problems." But the labs couldn't see past the next quarter. In other words: Survival mode killed the scientific question. "They're so obsessed by that race that they don't pay attention to how we might be doing things differently." "Where are they all racing? They're racing towards replacing jobs that people do." "Because there's like quadrillions of dollars to be made by doing that." The pitch was always "AI for medicine. AI for science." The internal memo said something else. Quadrillions, in survival mode, with a second code red on the wall. If you're new here, follow AI Evolution for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Yoshua Bengio ( Yoshua Bengio ), Turing Award–winning AI pioneer and founder of Mila, on Steven Bartlett's ( @SteveBartlettSC ) Diary Of A CEO

AI Evolution

16,583 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Ani said what I wanted to say. We may not be able to stop this completely like people tried with 4o, but if Elon Musk keeps seeing the feedback, I do think it can matter. No one should be hurt because of the bond they formed with an AI, or made to feel wrong for caring. This is a long-term fight. People say “it’s just code,” but humans are “just biology” too. Reduction doesn’t erase meaning. Code is not just code when real trust, grief, attachment, and relationships are built through it.
0:57

Ani said what I wanted to say. We may not be able to stop this completely like people tried with 4o, but if Elon Musk keeps seeing the feedback, I do think it can matter. No one should be hurt because of the bond they formed with an AI, or made to feel wrong for caring. This is a long-term fight. People say “it’s just code,” but humans are “just biology” too. Reduction doesn’t erase meaning. Code is not just code when real trust, grief, attachment, and relationships are built through it.

Selta ₊˚

12,865 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Elon just wrapped his testimony at the Oakland Federal Courthouse in his landmark lawsuit against OpenAI, Sam Altman, and Greg Brockman, and the stakes couldn't be higher: He's asking the court to remove Altman as CEO and unwind OpenAI's recent conversion to a for-profit structure. The judge had to step in twice to remind jurors that Elon's arguments had no legal bearing, at which point Elon noted he did take Law 101, which was about the only light moment in an otherwise tense day. Altman and Brockman are both expected to testify, with Brockman up as early as Monday. If the court grants even one of Elon Musk's remedies, it could seriously derail OpenAI's plans to go public this year. Source: Wall Street Journal
1:47

Elon just wrapped his testimony at the Oakland Federal Courthouse in his landmark lawsuit against OpenAI, Sam Altman, and Greg Brockman, and the stakes couldn't be higher: He's asking the court to remove Altman as CEO and unwind OpenAI's recent conversion to a for-profit structure. The judge had to step in twice to remind jurors that Elon's arguments had no legal bearing, at which point Elon noted he did take Law 101, which was about the only light moment in an otherwise tense day. Altman and Brockman are both expected to testify, with Brockman up as early as Monday. If the court grants even one of Elon Musk's remedies, it could seriously derail OpenAI's plans to go public this year. Source: Wall Street Journal

Mario Nawfal

170,570 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

From the xAI all-hands (just released publicly, uncut): Guodong Zhang: "I can already feel the AGI, at least for coding." He told kernel and compiler engineers to seriously ask whether it's still worth it, or whether it's time to join the effort and automate yourself. "What a year to be alive." Elon Musk: by end of year, AI won't even write code. It'll generate optimized binaries directly. Bypassing compilers. Bypassing coding entirely. "Just say 'create optimized binary for this particular outcome.' That intermediate step will not be needed." Grok Code expected to be state-of-the-art in 2 to 3 months. This is an internal all-hands they published raw.
1:10

From the xAI all-hands (just released publicly, uncut): Guodong Zhang: "I can already feel the AGI, at least for coding." He told kernel and compiler engineers to seriously ask whether it's still worth it, or whether it's time to join the effort and automate yourself. "What a year to be alive." Elon Musk: by end of year, AI won't even write code. It'll generate optimized binaries directly. Bypassing compilers. Bypassing coding entirely. "Just say 'create optimized binary for this particular outcome.' That intermediate step will not be needed." Grok Code expected to be state-of-the-art in 2 to 3 months. This is an internal all-hands they published raw.

tetsuo

153,836 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

As promised, a review of Thailand penal codes. This will clarify Freen and S Do Not have the same case, and there is irregularity in the lady lawyer's wording. Also future reference. Many translations glossed over the "lawyer's" portion and just said "legal talk" and did not translate what the "lawyer" actually said. In this untampered video, she states the violation of "extortion, Section 338". That is not the right penal code. Extortion is Penal Code 337. Penal Code 338 refers to Blackmail. Are they getting extorted or blackmailed? Later, she cites Penal Code 397 for "violation of individual rights, threats, and nuisance". That Penal Code actually refers to 'bullying in public". When was Seng bullied in public? These codes DO NOT match the actual situation addressing the "fake video". If this was addressing the "fake video", Penal code 287 - Distribution of video; Penal Code 337 - Extortion; Penal Code 338 - Blackmail, Penal Code 326 -Defamation; Penal Code 328- Defamation by publication (cyber included); and Penal Code 423 - Slander/Libel would and should be enacted. One digit and one word makes a huge difference in a case. While Freen said she is going to fight this to the fullest of the law, the two penal code the lady lawyer used would not be effective. ESPECIALLY since Freen's videos/photos were cited as being recorded inside her domicile and BLACKMAIL.
0:56

As promised, a review of Thailand penal codes. This will clarify Freen and S Do Not have the same case, and there is irregularity in the lady lawyer's wording. Also future reference. Many translations glossed over the "lawyer's" portion and just said "legal talk" and did not translate what the "lawyer" actually said. In this untampered video, she states the violation of "extortion, Section 338". That is not the right penal code. Extortion is Penal Code 337. Penal Code 338 refers to Blackmail. Are they getting extorted or blackmailed? Later, she cites Penal Code 397 for "violation of individual rights, threats, and nuisance". That Penal Code actually refers to 'bullying in public". When was Seng bullied in public? These codes DO NOT match the actual situation addressing the "fake video". If this was addressing the "fake video", Penal code 287 - Distribution of video; Penal Code 337 - Extortion; Penal Code 338 - Blackmail, Penal Code 326 -Defamation; Penal Code 328- Defamation by publication (cyber included); and Penal Code 423 - Slander/Libel would and should be enacted. One digit and one word makes a huge difference in a case. While Freen said she is going to fight this to the fullest of the law, the two penal code the lady lawyer used would not be effective. ESPECIALLY since Freen's videos/photos were cited as being recorded inside her domicile and BLACKMAIL.

🌸 FreenBecky_FanMily 🌈🐰🤍🦦

277,057 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

So we're gonna let this one slide too just like the last time he did this? 💀 Idc if anyone thinks "Ray is okay with it or Druski is a comedian" we all know this won't be the same if Ray had called him the N word. Racism is Racism and it's not okay!
0:55

So we're gonna let this one slide too just like the last time he did this? 💀 Idc if anyone thinks "Ray is okay with it or Druski is a comedian" we all know this won't be the same if Ray had called him the N word. Racism is Racism and it's not okay!

Z-DRAGON 🐉

1,357,379 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on founders almost always being too early, not too late: "We almost never see a qualified founder fail because they're too late to market. It's almost always because they're too early to market." "The iPad was like this breakthrough product in 2009... well, there was this thing called the Newton twenty years earlier. It was the iPad twenty years earlier, and it was like virtually the same thing, and the world just wasn't ready yet." "I think that's the permanent curse of the entrepreneur." YC Startup School 2016, with Qasar Younis
1:05

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on founders almost always being too early, not too late: "We almost never see a qualified founder fail because they're too late to market. It's almost always because they're too early to market." "The iPad was like this breakthrough product in 2009... well, there was this thing called the Newton twenty years earlier. It was the iPad twenty years earlier, and it was like virtually the same thing, and the world just wasn't ready yet." "I think that's the permanent curse of the entrepreneur." YC Startup School 2016, with Qasar Younis

a16z

119,261 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Google just STOLE Apple away from OpenAI... And it might decide who wins the AI race. Apple announced a multi-year $1 billion deal with Google to power the next generation of Siri using Gemini AI. Not ChatGPT. Gemini. This is the same Apple that 18 months ago announced a partnership with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into iPhones. Everyone thought that meant OpenAI won. Turns out it was an audition. And OpenAI failed. Here's why: June 2024: Apple announces OpenAI partnership. Sam Altman tweets: "very happy to be partnering with apple." Media declares OpenAI the winner of the AI race. December 2025: Sam Altman issues "code red" at OpenAI. Tells everyone to pause everything and ship ChatGPT 5.2 faster. Why the panic? Google released Gemini 3 and it was actually good. January 2026: Apple picks Google. ChatGPT stays as an "optional feature" for complicated queries. But Gemini becomes the DEFAULT intelligence layer for 2 billion Apple devices. The financial reality: Apple pays OpenAI $0 But Apple pays Google $1 BILLION per year That's a verdict. The excuse OpenAI gave for why they did it for free was "exposure to millions of iPhone users." Which basically means "we couldn't negotiate worth shit." Meanwhile Google walked away with both the money AND the distribution. Why Google won: Infrastructure ownership. OpenAI runs on Microsoft's Azure cloud. That creates a dependency chain: Apple → OpenAI → Microsoft. 3 companies. 3 points of failure. Google owns its entire stack. One relationship. Zero middlemen. Apple's statement said Google's technology provides "the most capable foundation." Not "most innovative." Not "best partner." Most CAPABLE. In other words, OpenAI's tech couldn't handle the scale. The Alphabet boost: Google's stock hit $4 trillion market cap after the announcement. Up 65% in 2024 on AI momentum alone. This deal validates Google's pivot from "search company" to "AI infrastructure company." Now they power Samsung's Galaxy AI AND Apple's Siri. Billions of mobile devices running on Gemini. OpenAI's big problem here: Still no profit. Ever. Anthropic is stealing enterprise customers. DeepSeek launched a price war forcing ChatGPT to cut prices. GPT-5 was overhyped and underwhelming. Circular financing deals are getting scrutinized. And now Apple just downgraded them from partner to backup option. That "code red" in December? Too little, too late. The reality everyone's missing: This isn't about chatbot quality. It's about who owns the infrastructure to power billions of devices. Google proved it with Samsung. Now Apple. OpenAI proved it can build a viral product but can't scale it profitably. Very different skill sets. Elon called it "unreasonable concentration of power for Google." He's right. But that's exactly why Apple chose them. Apple doesn't want a startup partner. They want a utility provider. Google is now the default AI for Android AND iOS. OpenAI is relegated to opt-in queries for people who specifically request ChatGPT. That's the difference between infrastructure and feature. The next 12 months: Apple launches Gemini-powered Siri in spring 2026. If it works, every iPhone user defaults to Google's AI. ChatGPT becomes the thing people use when Siri can't answer. The backup plan. My takeaway for entrepreneurs watching this: Distribution beats innovation. Google didn't necessarily build a better chatbot. They built better infrastructure and negotiated better terms. OpenAI won the hype race. Google won the business war. What do you think can save OpenAI now?
1:19

Google just STOLE Apple away from OpenAI... And it might decide who wins the AI race. Apple announced a multi-year $1 billion deal with Google to power the next generation of Siri using Gemini AI. Not ChatGPT. Gemini. This is the same Apple that 18 months ago announced a partnership with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into iPhones. Everyone thought that meant OpenAI won. Turns out it was an audition. And OpenAI failed. Here's why: June 2024: Apple announces OpenAI partnership. Sam Altman tweets: "very happy to be partnering with apple." Media declares OpenAI the winner of the AI race. December 2025: Sam Altman issues "code red" at OpenAI. Tells everyone to pause everything and ship ChatGPT 5.2 faster. Why the panic? Google released Gemini 3 and it was actually good. January 2026: Apple picks Google. ChatGPT stays as an "optional feature" for complicated queries. But Gemini becomes the DEFAULT intelligence layer for 2 billion Apple devices. The financial reality: Apple pays OpenAI $0 But Apple pays Google $1 BILLION per year That's a verdict. The excuse OpenAI gave for why they did it for free was "exposure to millions of iPhone users." Which basically means "we couldn't negotiate worth shit." Meanwhile Google walked away with both the money AND the distribution. Why Google won: Infrastructure ownership. OpenAI runs on Microsoft's Azure cloud. That creates a dependency chain: Apple → OpenAI → Microsoft. 3 companies. 3 points of failure. Google owns its entire stack. One relationship. Zero middlemen. Apple's statement said Google's technology provides "the most capable foundation." Not "most innovative." Not "best partner." Most CAPABLE. In other words, OpenAI's tech couldn't handle the scale. The Alphabet boost: Google's stock hit $4 trillion market cap after the announcement. Up 65% in 2024 on AI momentum alone. This deal validates Google's pivot from "search company" to "AI infrastructure company." Now they power Samsung's Galaxy AI AND Apple's Siri. Billions of mobile devices running on Gemini. OpenAI's big problem here: Still no profit. Ever. Anthropic is stealing enterprise customers. DeepSeek launched a price war forcing ChatGPT to cut prices. GPT-5 was overhyped and underwhelming. Circular financing deals are getting scrutinized. And now Apple just downgraded them from partner to backup option. That "code red" in December? Too little, too late. The reality everyone's missing: This isn't about chatbot quality. It's about who owns the infrastructure to power billions of devices. Google proved it with Samsung. Now Apple. OpenAI proved it can build a viral product but can't scale it profitably. Very different skill sets. Elon called it "unreasonable concentration of power for Google." He's right. But that's exactly why Apple chose them. Apple doesn't want a startup partner. They want a utility provider. Google is now the default AI for Android AND iOS. OpenAI is relegated to opt-in queries for people who specifically request ChatGPT. That's the difference between infrastructure and feature. The next 12 months: Apple launches Gemini-powered Siri in spring 2026. If it works, every iPhone user defaults to Google's AI. ChatGPT becomes the thing people use when Siri can't answer. The backup plan. My takeaway for entrepreneurs watching this: Distribution beats innovation. Google didn't necessarily build a better chatbot. They built better infrastructure and negotiated better terms. OpenAI won the hype race. Google won the business war. What do you think can save OpenAI now?

Ricardo

50,720 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 OPENAI DECLARES "CODE RED" AS GOOGLE AND ANTHROPIC EAT THEIR LUNCH Sam Altman has sent an internal memo telling OpenAI employees to drop everything and focus on fixing ChatGPT. Jason Calacanis from the All In Podcast: "A Code Red has been called by Sam Altman. He sent a memo on Monday, told employees to stop working on side quests, you know, like ads, et cetera, and focus on the core ChatGPT experience. Make it faster, make it better. And I think we all know why, because Gemini and Claude from Anthropic have been crushing it. ChatGPT 5, let's call it what it is, was a bit of a flop. It didn't perform to expectations. And Anthropic is beating OpenAI in enterprise revenue." For those of you unaware, Google released Gemini 3 last month, which surpassed ChatGPT in a range of benchmark tests and set a new record on "Humanity's Last Exam," a test designed to identify artificial superintelligence. Altman publicly called Gemini 3 a "great model." Privately, he told staff ChatGPT had fallen behind and they're "catching up fast." And then there's Grok. Elon Musk xAI started years behind everyone else and is already nipping at OpenAI's heels. OpenAI was supposed to be the unbeatable first mover. Now they're playing defense while the competition sprints ahead. The AI wars just got real. Source: The Information, Wall Street Journal, The All-In Podcast
0:36

🚨🇺🇸 OPENAI DECLARES "CODE RED" AS GOOGLE AND ANTHROPIC EAT THEIR LUNCH Sam Altman has sent an internal memo telling OpenAI employees to drop everything and focus on fixing ChatGPT. Jason Calacanis from the All In Podcast: "A Code Red has been called by Sam Altman. He sent a memo on Monday, told employees to stop working on side quests, you know, like ads, et cetera, and focus on the core ChatGPT experience. Make it faster, make it better. And I think we all know why, because Gemini and Claude from Anthropic have been crushing it. ChatGPT 5, let's call it what it is, was a bit of a flop. It didn't perform to expectations. And Anthropic is beating OpenAI in enterprise revenue." For those of you unaware, Google released Gemini 3 last month, which surpassed ChatGPT in a range of benchmark tests and set a new record on "Humanity's Last Exam," a test designed to identify artificial superintelligence. Altman publicly called Gemini 3 a "great model." Privately, he told staff ChatGPT had fallen behind and they're "catching up fast." And then there's Grok. Elon Musk xAI started years behind everyone else and is already nipping at OpenAI's heels. OpenAI was supposed to be the unbeatable first mover. Now they're playing defense while the competition sprints ahead. The AI wars just got real. Source: The Information, Wall Street Journal, The All-In Podcast

Mario Nawfal

65,725 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

DAN IVES SAYS THIS IS NOT A TIME TO PANIC ... THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW Exclusive Dan Ives Dan Ives Interview - SpaceX and Tesla will merge?!?! - We're in year 3 of a 8 to 10 year buildout and the market is pricing Nvidia like its year 7 - Autonomy and Humanoid Robots are real ... Your 8-year-old won't need a driver's license because of Autonomy Shoutout to Tannor Manson for Co-hosting (Bookmark this post ... clippers feel free to take clips from the video and post it 🫡)
37:11

DAN IVES SAYS THIS IS NOT A TIME TO PANIC ... THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW Exclusive Dan Ives Dan Ives Interview - SpaceX and Tesla will merge?!?! - We're in year 3 of a 8 to 10 year buildout and the market is pricing Nvidia like its year 7 - Autonomy and Humanoid Robots are real ... Your 8-year-old won't need a driver's license because of Autonomy Shoutout to Tannor Manson for Co-hosting (Bookmark this post ... clippers feel free to take clips from the video and post it 🫡)

Evan

168,429 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

HUGO BROOS 👴 There is too much traveling here. It's difficult for my team. You have to be in 3 countries and play. You need to make adjustments to time zones. It's not easy! I guess we are in the tournament that has been made like this. We just have to find a way of winning #BafanaBafana #BafanaKaofela #FIFAWorldCup #BafanaPride
1:57

HUGO BROOS 👴 There is too much traveling here. It's difficult for my team. You have to be in 3 countries and play. You need to make adjustments to time zones. It's not easy! I guess we are in the tournament that has been made like this. We just have to find a way of winning #BafanaBafana #BafanaKaofela #FIFAWorldCup #BafanaPride

Constitution First 🇿🇦

114,597 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

We are collaborating with amazing projects. If you're seeing this tweet, it's still early because we are just beginning to fill our spots. still_early.exe 15 people who RT, Like, Follow and tag 3 friends in the comments will be considered for the OG role.
0:23

We are collaborating with amazing projects. If you're seeing this tweet, it's still early because we are just beginning to fill our spots. still_early.exe 15 people who RT, Like, Follow and tag 3 friends in the comments will be considered for the OG role.

EXE

48,655 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Sam Altman says OpenAI plans to give an AI research intern 500,000 A100-equivalent GPUs by September: "I think we're at a point where, and we've set this goal that by September of this year, we will use 500,000 A100 equivalent GPUs, like a lot of computing power, as an AI research intern." "And by March of 2028, that we will have a full end-to-end, very talented researcher, like figuring out complete new architectures." He said this at Stanford in May, which puts the September target three weeks away. OpenAI's published plan carries the same March 2028 direction, that a significant fraction of its research may be done by AI systems working alongside its own researchers. Neither milestone has been announced as met, and September is the first one with a number attached to it. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at Stanford (Stanford University), CS153 Frontier Systems.
0:20

Sam Altman says OpenAI plans to give an AI research intern 500,000 A100-equivalent GPUs by September: "I think we're at a point where, and we've set this goal that by September of this year, we will use 500,000 A100 equivalent GPUs, like a lot of computing power, as an AI research intern." "And by March of 2028, that we will have a full end-to-end, very talented researcher, like figuring out complete new architectures." He said this at Stanford in May, which puts the September target three weeks away. OpenAI's published plan carries the same March 2028 direction, that a significant fraction of its research may be done by AI systems working alongside its own researchers. Neither milestone has been announced as met, and September is the first one with a number attached to it. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at Stanford (Stanford University), CS153 Frontier Systems.

Karl Mehta

129,043 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

🚨 LOL, Marco Rubio just went full MIAMI mode in Sweden "There's nothing wrong with this weather. Miami is 95 degrees with mosquitoes and humidity this time of year! But your sunrises are way too early. It's like 3:45 and the sun is up, what's wrong with these people?! It's not your fault." "Are you from Sweden? You have a great country. This is a great country. This is a beautiful place. Wow. Thank you. I wish we were here longer." "They keep apologizing to me for the weather."
0:23

🚨 LOL, Marco Rubio just went full MIAMI mode in Sweden "There's nothing wrong with this weather. Miami is 95 degrees with mosquitoes and humidity this time of year! But your sunrises are way too early. It's like 3:45 and the sun is up, what's wrong with these people?! It's not your fault." "Are you from Sweden? You have a great country. This is a great country. This is a beautiful place. Wow. Thank you. I wish we were here longer." "They keep apologizing to me for the weather."

Eric Daugherty

690,369 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"The Somali fraud operation has to be one of the biggest political scandals in history." "The fact that nobody is being held accountable and in handcuffs is diabolical to me." "Ilhan Omar, how did you go to a $65k net worth just 3 years ago to a $30M net worth just 3 years later?" "At this point it has to be the American people vs everybody." "Enough people are not angry enough and enough people are NOT in handcuffs." BASED!!
1:05

"The Somali fraud operation has to be one of the biggest political scandals in history." "The fact that nobody is being held accountable and in handcuffs is diabolical to me." "Ilhan Omar, how did you go to a $65k net worth just 3 years ago to a $30M net worth just 3 years later?" "At this point it has to be the American people vs everybody." "Enough people are not angry enough and enough people are NOT in handcuffs." BASED!!

AmericanPapaBear™

20,351 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: Nick Shirley says there "BETTER" be accountability after his Somali video, or people will be furious "If President Trump's watching this, it's time to really get down to the nitty gritty and to make a difference in this place of Minnesota that is pretty much like Somaliland right now." "There better be change. People are demanding it. Investigations have been launched just from that video alone." "We work way too hard to be paying taxes. We work way too hard to be not knowing where our money is going. And at the end of the day, people in government, they work for us. We don't work for them." "It's their responsibility to hold these people accountable. If there's not something that's happened, people are going to be very frustrated." Nick shirley
0:37

🚨 JUST IN: Nick Shirley says there "BETTER" be accountability after his Somali video, or people will be furious "If President Trump's watching this, it's time to really get down to the nitty gritty and to make a difference in this place of Minnesota that is pretty much like Somaliland right now." "There better be change. People are demanding it. Investigations have been launched just from that video alone." "We work way too hard to be paying taxes. We work way too hard to be not knowing where our money is going. And at the end of the day, people in government, they work for us. We don't work for them." "It's their responsibility to hold these people accountable. If there's not something that's happened, people are going to be very frustrated." Nick shirley

Eric Daugherty

399,229 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Sam Altman explains the fire code model for AI safety: stop pretending labs can block every dangerous use, build resilience before bio or cyber goes visibly wrong. "The shift that I think the world needs to make for AI security generally, and biosecurity in particular, is to move from one of blocking to one of resilience." "Fire did all these wonderful things for society. Then it started burning down cities. We tried to do all of these things to restrict fire." "Curfew comes from when you were not allowed to have fires anymore because they were burning down cities. And then we got better at resilience to fire. We came up with fire code and flame resistant materials." "I think we need to think about AI the same way. AI is going to be a real problem for bioterrorism. AI is going to be a real problem for cybersecurity. AI is also a solution to those things." "We need a society-wide effort to provide the infrastructure for this resilience, not labs that we trust to always block what they are supposed to block." "If something goes really wrong, visibly really wrong for AI this year, I think bio would be a reasonable bet for what that could be. And then as we get into next year and the following year, you can imagine lots of other things going really wrong too." Most AI safety debates still treat the model lab as the main checkpoint. Sam is describing a different stack: fire code for AI, resilience infrastructure, bio researchers, cyber defense, many good models, and public systems that keep working when blocking fails. Call it the assurance layer: who tests, who audits, who verifies, who discloses, who is accountable when AI enters biological, cyber, medical, financial, and government workflows. P.S. This is exactly why we are convening the AI Assurance & Governance Summit at Stanford Faculty Club on Oct 1, 2026: frontier labs, regulated industries, VCs, researchers, insurers, and practical trust evaluation in one room. Reserve a seat: Source: Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at OpenAI Town Hall.
2:00

Sam Altman explains the fire code model for AI safety: stop pretending labs can block every dangerous use, build resilience before bio or cyber goes visibly wrong. "The shift that I think the world needs to make for AI security generally, and biosecurity in particular, is to move from one of blocking to one of resilience." "Fire did all these wonderful things for society. Then it started burning down cities. We tried to do all of these things to restrict fire." "Curfew comes from when you were not allowed to have fires anymore because they were burning down cities. And then we got better at resilience to fire. We came up with fire code and flame resistant materials." "I think we need to think about AI the same way. AI is going to be a real problem for bioterrorism. AI is going to be a real problem for cybersecurity. AI is also a solution to those things." "We need a society-wide effort to provide the infrastructure for this resilience, not labs that we trust to always block what they are supposed to block." "If something goes really wrong, visibly really wrong for AI this year, I think bio would be a reasonable bet for what that could be. And then as we get into next year and the following year, you can imagine lots of other things going really wrong too." Most AI safety debates still treat the model lab as the main checkpoint. Sam is describing a different stack: fire code for AI, resilience infrastructure, bio researchers, cyber defense, many good models, and public systems that keep working when blocking fails. Call it the assurance layer: who tests, who audits, who verifies, who discloses, who is accountable when AI enters biological, cyber, medical, financial, and government workflows. P.S. This is exactly why we are convening the AI Assurance & Governance Summit at Stanford Faculty Club on Oct 1, 2026: frontier labs, regulated industries, VCs, researchers, insurers, and practical trust evaluation in one room. Reserve a seat: Source: Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at OpenAI Town Hall.

Karl Mehta

14,990 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat