Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

📁 Sam Altman says the real risk is speed, because this technology is only three years old and already the fastest adopted in history. What can cure diseases can also be misused and the tension rises when jobs change faster than society can adapt. New jobs will come, but... show more

Jon Hernandez

24,839 subscribers

91,611 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Sam Altman warns that AI is spreading faster than any technology in history. He fears society may struggle to keep up as jobs shift at high speed. He urges a responsible rollout so people have time to adapt and give feedback. He believes better work will emerge, but the transition’s pace is the real risk.

Sam Altman warns that AI is spreading faster than any technology in history. He fears society may struggle to keep up as jobs shift at high speed. He urges a responsible rollout so people have time to adapt and give feedback. He believes better work will emerge, but the transition’s pace is the real risk.

Wes Roth

79,722 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

📁 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, says the problem with AI is not if it works. It is what happens when it does. Because curing disease is not enough. The real question is: what do you do when you are no longer needed?

📁 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, says the problem with AI is not if it works. It is what happens when it does. Because curing disease is not enough. The real question is: what do you do when you are no longer needed?

Jon Hernandez

49,677 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Economist asks why China and America see AI so differently. The answer is bigger than technology. It is psychology. In China, optimism about AI runs from government policy to companies to ordinary workers. People know disruption is coming. They know jobs will change. They know some industries will disappear. But the instinct is still: build first, adapt fast, solve the problems as they appear. In America, the instinct increasingly runs the other way: fear the disruption, litigate it, regulate it, politicize it, build barriers around it, and then call the barriers “responsible innovation.” The difference is deeper than AI. China still has a strong social belief that technology can make life better and that society can absorb change. America increasingly treats every technological shift as another mechanism through which ordinary people may be abandoned by the system. That is why one society sees robots and asks: “How do we use them?” while the other asks: “Who is going to lose their job?” One is operating from confidence. The other from accumulated distrust. And that matters far more than any benchmark. You cannot lead a technological revolution if your society has already decided that every new technology is another threat waiting to happen. China is not fearless because disruption does not hurt. China is less afraid because it still believes disruption can be survived. America’s real problem is not that it fears AI. It is that too many Americans no longer trust their own system to protect them from the future. The real AI gap may not be compute. It may be confidence in the future.

The Economist asks why China and America see AI so differently. The answer is bigger than technology. It is psychology. In China, optimism about AI runs from government policy to companies to ordinary workers. People know disruption is coming. They know jobs will change. They know some industries will disappear. But the instinct is still: build first, adapt fast, solve the problems as they appear. In America, the instinct increasingly runs the other way: fear the disruption, litigate it, regulate it, politicize it, build barriers around it, and then call the barriers “responsible innovation.” The difference is deeper than AI. China still has a strong social belief that technology can make life better and that society can absorb change. America increasingly treats every technological shift as another mechanism through which ordinary people may be abandoned by the system. That is why one society sees robots and asks: “How do we use them?” while the other asks: “Who is going to lose their job?” One is operating from confidence. The other from accumulated distrust. And that matters far more than any benchmark. You cannot lead a technological revolution if your society has already decided that every new technology is another threat waiting to happen. China is not fearless because disruption does not hurt. China is less afraid because it still believes disruption can be survived. America’s real problem is not that it fears AI. It is that too many Americans no longer trust their own system to protect them from the future. The real AI gap may not be compute. It may be confidence in the future.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

61,872 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

📁 Geoffrey Hinton says the impact of AI will be radical and deeply uncertain. Many jobs will disappear and there is no guarantee new ones will replace them. AI will massively boost productivity, but the real issue is not technological. It is political. How wealth is distributed when work is no longer required. More productivity does not guarantee a better future. Without systemic change, it could mean the opposite.

📁 Geoffrey Hinton says the impact of AI will be radical and deeply uncertain. Many jobs will disappear and there is no guarantee new ones will replace them. AI will massively boost productivity, but the real issue is not technological. It is political. How wealth is distributed when work is no longer required. More productivity does not guarantee a better future. Without systemic change, it could mean the opposite.

Jon Hernandez

14,036 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

📁 Sam Altman says the real Turing test is when AI can do science, and with GPT-5 we’re already seeing the first signs. In two years, these models will make key discoveries that transform the world, because scientific progress is what drives humanity forward.

📁 Sam Altman says the real Turing test is when AI can do science, and with GPT-5 we’re already seeing the first signs. In two years, these models will make key discoveries that transform the world, because scientific progress is what drives humanity forward.

Jon Hernandez

27,052 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

📁 Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, says AI will disrupt jobs faster and broader than anything before. Some roles, even software engineers, may shrink as models automate entire workflows. The real question is not which jobs disappear. It is whether we create new ones in time.

📁 Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, says AI will disrupt jobs faster and broader than anything before. Some roles, even software engineers, may shrink as models automate entire workflows. The real question is not which jobs disappear. It is whether we create new ones in time.

Jon Hernandez

33,387 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Dario Amodei says AI disruption isn't different in kind from past technological shifts, but it's deeper and faster Unlike factories or the internet, AI hits multiple entry points at once The worry is we're eliminating jobs faster than we can adapt people or create new ones

Dario Amodei says AI disruption isn't different in kind from past technological shifts, but it's deeper and faster Unlike factories or the internet, AI hits multiple entry points at once The worry is we're eliminating jobs faster than we can adapt people or create new ones

Haider.

26,687 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.

TBPN

21,828 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Holy moly, Lyria 3 is mindblowing. Not necessarily because it can now also create songs like Suno, but because it perfectly creates songs in languages other than English. I had it create a German song in the style of Hans Eisler as an example – and not only is there no accent, but the German is perfect, and the music-to-lyrics ratio is outstanding.

Holy moly, Lyria 3 is mindblowing. Not necessarily because it can now also create songs like Suno, but because it perfectly creates songs in languages other than English. I had it create a German song in the style of Hans Eisler as an example – and not only is there no accent, but the German is perfect, and the music-to-lyrics ratio is outstanding.

Chubby♨️

33,817 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on AI: The fact that this is going to be the end of humanity—it's complete nonsense. The fact that this is going to destroy half of the American jobs—it's complete nonsense. AI will increase productivity. When productivity is increased, it creates opportunities. Over the history of technology, society has become more productive as a result of technology. It has created more jobs, not less. Source: Axios

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on AI: The fact that this is going to be the end of humanity—it's complete nonsense. The fact that this is going to destroy half of the American jobs—it's complete nonsense. AI will increase productivity. When productivity is increased, it creates opportunities. Over the history of technology, society has become more productive as a result of technology. It has created more jobs, not less. Source: Axios

Clash Report

16,704 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Sam Altman says society needs to act before AI advances too quickly. The real question isn’t whether AI will cure diseases, but what role people will play when work, creativity, and decision-making begin to shift to machines. Useful technology cannot leave people out of the picture.

Sam Altman says society needs to act before AI advances too quickly. The real question isn’t whether AI will cure diseases, but what role people will play when work, creativity, and decision-making begin to shift to machines. Useful technology cannot leave people out of the picture.

Jon Hernandez

23,805 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sam Altman says "people will lose jobs" to AI and "not everyone's going to like all of the impacts, but this is coming. This is a scientific achievement of humanity that is going to get embedded in everything we do," per tsarnick.

Sam Altman says "people will lose jobs" to AI and "not everyone's going to like all of the impacts, but this is coming. This is a scientific achievement of humanity that is going to get embedded in everything we do," per tsarnick.

unusual_whales

2,431,448 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman says the day is approaching when we can ask an AI model to solve all of physics and it can actually do that

Sam Altman says the day is approaching when we can ask an AI model to solve all of physics and it can actually do that

Tsarathustra

851,944 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Sam Altman says OpenAI's Deep Research can do 5% of all tasks in the economy today and while it usually takes society two generations to adapt to change, it has never had to do so in 5-10 years as is happening now

Sam Altman says OpenAI's Deep Research can do 5% of all tasks in the economy today and while it usually takes society two generations to adapt to change, it has never had to do so in 5-10 years as is happening now

Tsarathustra

185,410 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Father of HBM, Kim Jung-ho says physical AI is really a memory problem, because a self-driving car can't react faster than its memory can recall what it learned, and the stakes are: it cannot be a second late on the brakes. "Physical AI is memory AI." "The car crashes as it drives, remembers it all, and learns from it." "What's harder is the learning and reasoning must be real-time. A self-driving car can't hit the brakes a second late." "So here not just capacity, but speed matters too. Memory's speed." "Future memory will lead the AI revolution, and there it's speed and capacity. Speed is bandwidth, capacity is stacking. That's how I see it." ______ More from his lecture here:

The Father of HBM, Kim Jung-ho says physical AI is really a memory problem, because a self-driving car can't react faster than its memory can recall what it learned, and the stakes are: it cannot be a second late on the brakes. "Physical AI is memory AI." "The car crashes as it drives, remembers it all, and learns from it." "What's harder is the learning and reasoning must be real-time. A self-driving car can't hit the brakes a second late." "So here not just capacity, but speed matters too. Memory's speed." "Future memory will lead the AI revolution, and there it's speed and capacity. Speed is bandwidth, capacity is stacking. That's how I see it." ______ More from his lecture here:

Fireside Alpha

78,493 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

📁 Mo Gawdat, former Google executive, says the biggest mistake is thinking AI is just a tool. Today it is an infant, but it will not stay there. He warns we are entering the most decisive moment in human history, with a mini dystopia already underway. Not because of AI itself, but because of how humans use it. Intelligence has no polarity. It amplifies the best or the worst. The real danger is not AI, it is human arrogance.

📁 Mo Gawdat, former Google executive, says the biggest mistake is thinking AI is just a tool. Today it is an infant, but it will not stay there. He warns we are entering the most decisive moment in human history, with a mini dystopia already underway. Not because of AI itself, but because of how humans use it. Intelligence has no polarity. It amplifies the best or the worst. The real danger is not AI, it is human arrogance.

Jon Hernandez

31,428 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “AI is going to do more of the total thinking than people are … It likely will be quite disruptive to a lot of the current jobs if more of the intellectual horsepower in the world is GPU’s.”

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “AI is going to do more of the total thinking than people are … It likely will be quite disruptive to a lot of the current jobs if more of the intellectual horsepower in the world is GPU’s.”

Chief Nerd

49,929 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten