Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Sam Harris on why Hamas is worse than Nazis: “There are many differences between Nazism and jihadism, of course. But they only make the Nazis look relatively benign….Nazis didn’t use their own women and children as human shields.” Moral clarity.

2,050,925 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania2 лет назад

Sam Harris on the question of Palestinian civilians: “Hitler was extraordinarily popular among Germans all the while. There was no clear line of demarcation between Nazis and ordinary Germans… Well, the Palestinians have given us Hamas.”

Фото профиля Max Blumenthal
Max Blumenthal2 лет назад

A Jewish Zionist meditation coach minimizes one genocide to defend those currently committing another. Moral clarity!

Фото профиля Jack Spitz
Jack Spitz2 лет назад

I missed the part where the Nazis were living under occupation for decades.

Фото профиля Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania2 лет назад

Nazis did end up under occupation, and chose to care about their own children so became peaceful and prosperous. Unlike Palestinians, who prioritize hating Jews.

Фото профиля Johnny Saint
Johnny Saint2 лет назад

Sam Harris is worst than Hamas.

Фото профиля FB UK 🇬🇧🇵🇸
FB UK 🇬🇧🇵🇸2 лет назад

Let's be honest - Sam struggles to hide his Jewishness. Behind all his pseudo intellectual writings, there is deep hatered for Muslims. Chomsky savagely exposed this right wing white supremacist.

Фото профиля Niccolò Cavagnola 光头
Niccolò Cavagnola 光头2 лет назад

Does the human shields argument encompass those cases when the IDF purposely bombs a target that happens to be with the women and children of his family?

Фото профиля Jeffreejay
Jeffreejay2 лет назад

Zionism is more like Nazism than any other concept.

Фото профиля They Truly HATE You
They Truly HATE You2 лет назад

So apparently Sam Harris has never heard of Volkssturm

Фото профиля Anatoly Karlin 🧲💯
Anatoly Karlin 🧲💯2 лет назад

I don't think soft Holocaust denial is moral clarity.

Похожие видео

Sam Harris articulating why "using human shields" versus "being deterred by them" tells you "everything you need to know about the moral imbalance between Israel and her enemies." TRANSCRIPT: The truth is that everything you need to know about the moral imbalance between Israel and her enemies can be understood on the topic of human shields. Who uses human shields? Well, Hamas certainly does. They shoot their rockets from residential neighborhoods, from beside schools, and hospitals, and mosques. Muslims in other recent conflicts, in Iraq and elsewhere, have also used human shields. They have laid their rifles on the shoulders of their own children and shot from behind their bodies. Consider the moral difference between using human shields and being deterred by them. That is the difference we’re talking about. The Israelis and other Western powers are deterred, however imperfectly, by the Muslim use of human shields in these conflicts, as we should be. It is morally abhorrent to kill noncombatants if you can avoid it. It’s certainly abhorrent to shoot through the bodies of children to get at your adversary. But take a moment to reflect on how contemptible this behavior is. And understand how cynical it is. The Muslims are acting on the assumption—the knowledge, in fact—that the infidels with whom they fight, the very people whom their religion does nothing but vilify, will be deterred by their use of Muslim human shields. They consider the Jews the spawn of apes and pigs—and yet they rely on the fact that they don’t want to kill Muslim noncombatants. Now imagine reversing the roles here. Imagine how fatuous—indeed how comical it would be—for the Israelis to attempt to use human shields to deter the Palestinians. Of course, that would be ridiculous. The Palestinians are trying to kill everyone. Killing women and children is part of the plan. Reversing the roles here produces a grotesque Monty Python skit. If you’re going to talk about the conflict in the Middle East, you have to acknowledge this difference. I don’t think there’s any ethical disparity to be found anywhere that is more shocking or consequential than this.

Colin Wright

1,635,562 просмотров • 3 лет назад