Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Same anchor. Same chair. Two interviews. Interview 1 — Kanhaiya Kumar mentions RSS & Godse on live TV. Megha Prasad LOSES IT. Interrupts. Argues. Loses her journalist “neutrality” in 10 seconds flat. Interview 2 — Himanta Biswa Sarma calls the constitutional Leader of Opposition of India a “पूरा पागल”...

TheSincereDude's profile picture

Sincere Dibya

13,781 subscribers

82,947 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

VIDEO | "It was wrong. It is wrong to ask about caste to a powerful, popular leader of opposition Rahul Gandhi. You cannot ask about caste like this. We are trying to make Anurag Thakur understand, who is also our own. This is not the opposition of the past, the govt is also not like the one it used to be. The PM is not able to make eye contact with leader of opposition, when the LoP is daring him. This is a fragile govt. If they continue like this, it would be problematic," says TMC leader Shatrughan Sinha (Shatrughan Sinha) on row over BJP leader Anurag Thakur's speech made in the Parliament yesterday.
1:59

VIDEO | "It was wrong. It is wrong to ask about caste to a powerful, popular leader of opposition Rahul Gandhi. You cannot ask about caste like this. We are trying to make Anurag Thakur understand, who is also our own. This is not the opposition of the past, the govt is also not like the one it used to be. The PM is not able to make eye contact with leader of opposition, when the LoP is daring him. This is a fragile govt. If they continue like this, it would be problematic," says TMC leader Shatrughan Sinha (Shatrughan Sinha) on row over BJP leader Anurag Thakur's speech made in the Parliament yesterday.

Press Trust of India

127,228 views • 2 years ago

Strongly condemn the attack on Mahaa News by BRS goons, led by KCR’s son #TappingTillu This is not just an attack on a building—it is an attack on Freedom of the Press. BRS always preaches about journalism. Is this how you show it? By sending people to damage a Media office? When you were in power, your supporters spread lies and abused many of us. Did we ever send mobs to your doors? And what happened to the days when Mahaa News supported you ? Is this how you treat those who once stood with you ? This attack is a clear attempt to distract from the TV anchor’s suicide, where persons associated with BRS are being accused of abetment. Shame on you for using fear to cover up your guilt. You can break cameras, not truth. You can silence voices, not questions. You can attack a channel, but not journalism. This is not just wrong - it’s a crime. And the people are watching. We demand Congress govt to immediately take action against those involved in attack.
0:42

Strongly condemn the attack on Mahaa News by BRS goons, led by KCR’s son #TappingTillu This is not just an attack on a building—it is an attack on Freedom of the Press. BRS always preaches about journalism. Is this how you show it? By sending people to damage a Media office? When you were in power, your supporters spread lies and abused many of us. Did we ever send mobs to your doors? And what happened to the days when Mahaa News supported you ? Is this how you treat those who once stood with you ? This attack is a clear attempt to distract from the TV anchor’s suicide, where persons associated with BRS are being accused of abetment. Shame on you for using fear to cover up your guilt. You can break cameras, not truth. You can silence voices, not questions. You can attack a channel, but not journalism. This is not just wrong - it’s a crime. And the people are watching. We demand Congress govt to immediately take action against those involved in attack.

Bandi Sanjay Kumar

175,650 views • 1 year ago

James Talarico is running around Texas pitching the warm, fuzzy idea that every religion is just a different "pathway" to the exact same fundamental truth. They're NOT. We can still be courteous to each other, but that's not the same as having the same truth. When anyone tries to sell you this version of "unity," they are asking you to throw out the God that has a name, the God who deals with you as an individual, and replace Him with a meaningless average. Because the average of everything is NOTHING. You are going to hear this exact narrative pushed in your own community, your own church, and your own life. THIS is how to stand against it.
8:01

James Talarico is running around Texas pitching the warm, fuzzy idea that every religion is just a different "pathway" to the exact same fundamental truth. They're NOT. We can still be courteous to each other, but that's not the same as having the same truth. When anyone tries to sell you this version of "unity," they are asking you to throw out the God that has a name, the God who deals with you as an individual, and replace Him with a meaningless average. Because the average of everything is NOTHING. You are going to hear this exact narrative pushed in your own community, your own church, and your own life. THIS is how to stand against it.

Glenn Beck

66,219 views • 1 month ago

Tom Cruise treating a BBC shower statistic like a mission brief is the most Tom Cruise thing that has happened on a talk show in years. Graham asks how many showers the average person in the UK takes in a year. Florence starts sweating and guesses 500. Tom locks in at 340, then immediately tries to renegotiate the terms: baths or showers? If it’s just showers he drops to 140. Florence looks at him like he just confessed to a war crime and asks the only question that matters: “Are you not washing your butt every day?” That’s the clip. Not the number. The look on her face when she realises the man who hangs off planes for a living might not be showering like a civilian. Graham, of course, goes for the cheap shot that Tom’s low guess is just him clocking that British people stink. The actual answer they land on is 275. Nobody on that sofa was even close, which is the point. They weren’t answering a quiz. They were revealing how they live. Florence is the one who said the quiet part. Tom is the one who couldn’t let a throwaway stat sit without trying to win it. Hugh Grant is just sitting there like a man who has survived worse energy in the same chair. Most talk-show games are filler. This one accidentally became a character study in 90 seconds. The man will jump out of a plane. He will not concede a shower count without a second estimate.
2:18

Tom Cruise treating a BBC shower statistic like a mission brief is the most Tom Cruise thing that has happened on a talk show in years. Graham asks how many showers the average person in the UK takes in a year. Florence starts sweating and guesses 500. Tom locks in at 340, then immediately tries to renegotiate the terms: baths or showers? If it’s just showers he drops to 140. Florence looks at him like he just confessed to a war crime and asks the only question that matters: “Are you not washing your butt every day?” That’s the clip. Not the number. The look on her face when she realises the man who hangs off planes for a living might not be showering like a civilian. Graham, of course, goes for the cheap shot that Tom’s low guess is just him clocking that British people stink. The actual answer they land on is 275. Nobody on that sofa was even close, which is the point. They weren’t answering a quiz. They were revealing how they live. Florence is the one who said the quiet part. Tom is the one who couldn’t let a throwaway stat sit without trying to win it. Hugh Grant is just sitting there like a man who has survived worse energy in the same chair. Most talk-show games are filler. This one accidentally became a character study in 90 seconds. The man will jump out of a plane. He will not concede a shower count without a second estimate.

ADEX🕴️

278,994 views • 23 days ago

The guy in the video says ICE is targeting people for their skin color. No. They’re targeting people who are here illegally. When 90% of the people you encounter in a given operation are illegal and happen to share the same demographic profile, 90% of the arrests will look the same. That’s not racism. That’s just what the data looks like when you enforce the actual law. He even got a free counter-example handed to him on camera: Polish illegals got arrested in the same operation. Same system. Different skin. Same result. If the population of people who crossed the border illegally is heavily skewed toward one group, the people getting removed will be skewed the same way. That’s not a conspiracy. It’s arithmetic. The skin-color claim is a persuasion filter designed to make the audience feel moral instead of looking at the actual numbers. Once you notice the filter, the argument collapses. Illegal presence is the criterion. Everything else is just noise.
0:42

The guy in the video says ICE is targeting people for their skin color. No. They’re targeting people who are here illegally. When 90% of the people you encounter in a given operation are illegal and happen to share the same demographic profile, 90% of the arrests will look the same. That’s not racism. That’s just what the data looks like when you enforce the actual law. He even got a free counter-example handed to him on camera: Polish illegals got arrested in the same operation. Same system. Different skin. Same result. If the population of people who crossed the border illegally is heavily skewed toward one group, the people getting removed will be skewed the same way. That’s not a conspiracy. It’s arithmetic. The skin-color claim is a persuasion filter designed to make the audience feel moral instead of looking at the actual numbers. Once you notice the filter, the argument collapses. Illegal presence is the criterion. Everything else is just noise.

Gregory K Bovino

18,422 views • 2 months ago

Globalists want you to believe that the Fulani Muslim attacks in Plateau and other middle belt states of Nigeria are just “tribal clashes.” Listen to the people on the ground: “It’s not about tribe. That is just to divert attention. To say we are just after Berom, after Mwaghavul. It’s not true. The same attacks that happen among Berom and Mwaghavul is the same happening here in Bokkos.” “That’s just to deceive. When they attack one place, they tell the others, we are not fighting you, but eventually they will come over.” “This is about the Church. This is about Christians. Nobody is safe as far as you are a Christian on the Plateau.” This is not a tribal clash. It is Christian persecution
1:09

Globalists want you to believe that the Fulani Muslim attacks in Plateau and other middle belt states of Nigeria are just “tribal clashes.” Listen to the people on the ground: “It’s not about tribe. That is just to divert attention. To say we are just after Berom, after Mwaghavul. It’s not true. The same attacks that happen among Berom and Mwaghavul is the same happening here in Bokkos.” “That’s just to deceive. When they attack one place, they tell the others, we are not fighting you, but eventually they will come over.” “This is about the Church. This is about Christians. Nobody is safe as far as you are a Christian on the Plateau.” This is not a tribal clash. It is Christian persecution

Masara Kim

19,039 views • 7 days ago

Maybe, just maybe if you get an entire month dedicated to you solely based on who you have sex with you’re not oppressed, just maybe! When someone says they do not support homosexuality & the response is something to the tune of “you don’t think gay people are humans” you know they are just trying to shut down the conversation by labeling you a hateful bigot. This is a tactic that’s used by ppl who cannot accept a different opinion. The fact that ppl are so up in arms about what a couple baseball players did to show they do not support the celebration of another persons sexuality is insane. Case in point are the ppl in this video.
0:25

Sensitive content

Maybe, just maybe if you get an entire month dedicated to you solely based on who you have sex with you’re not oppressed, just maybe! When someone says they do not support homosexuality & the response is something to the tune of “you don’t think gay people are humans” you know they are just trying to shut down the conversation by labeling you a hateful bigot. This is a tactic that’s used by ppl who cannot accept a different opinion. The fact that ppl are so up in arms about what a couple baseball players did to show they do not support the celebration of another persons sexuality is insane. Case in point are the ppl in this video.

Libs Of Chicago

36,522 views • 4 months ago

An entire empire was overthrown over a two percent tax on a breakfast beverage. Look at what you tolerate now. You are taxed when you earn it. Taxed when you spend it. Taxed when you save it. Taxed when you invest it. And when you die, they tax whatever is left. That is not a system. That is a harvest. You commute in a car you paid sales tax to buy. You drive it on roads you were already taxed to build. You fill it with gas taxed by the gallon. When you sell that car, the next buyer pays sales tax on it again. The same car. Taxed every time it changes hands. You arrive at a job where your salary is cut before it ever touches your hands. If you work for yourself, you pay both sides. Two people on paper. Neither one keeps what they earned. Then you go home. Every bill you open has a government standing behind it with its hand out. You buy a house with money they already took their share of. Then they charge you property tax on it every year for the rest of your life. You want to renovate your own kitchen. You need a permit. You want to build a deck on your own land. You need a permit. You pay for the property. Then you pay for permission to use it. Stop paying property tax and they seize your home. Not because you missed a mortgage payment. Because you missed a payment to the government for the privilege of keeping what is already yours. You do not own your home. You rent it from the state. If you leave something behind for your children, they are taxed on what you were already taxed to earn. The same wealth. Taxed at every stage of your life. Then taxed one final time because you had the audacity to die. They found a way to monetize your absence. We are told this is the price of civilization. It is not. It is architecture. The most effective prison ever built is the one where the inmates believe they are free. They did not take your freedom. They priced you out of it. If you kept the full value of your labor, you would be free within years. Not decades. Years. The system cannot allow that. A machine built on consumption needs a consumer that never stops. You did not sign a social contract. You were assigned one. Now pay attention. They spent decades perfecting the extraction of your productivity. Now they are building the technology to replace you. AI is not coming for your job because corporations are greedy. It is coming because a system that already takes half your output just realized it can take all of it. Without needing you in the equation. You were never the point of this arrangement. You were the input. And the moment they engineer a cheaper one, you become a rounding error on a quarterly earnings call. They did not build AI to free you. They built it to finish what the tax code started. It was never about the tea. It was about the precedent. Today we hand over half our waking lives and thank them for the potholes. You do not live in a free economy. You live in a subscription you never signed up for. And the penalty for canceling is everything you have.
0:57

An entire empire was overthrown over a two percent tax on a breakfast beverage. Look at what you tolerate now. You are taxed when you earn it. Taxed when you spend it. Taxed when you save it. Taxed when you invest it. And when you die, they tax whatever is left. That is not a system. That is a harvest. You commute in a car you paid sales tax to buy. You drive it on roads you were already taxed to build. You fill it with gas taxed by the gallon. When you sell that car, the next buyer pays sales tax on it again. The same car. Taxed every time it changes hands. You arrive at a job where your salary is cut before it ever touches your hands. If you work for yourself, you pay both sides. Two people on paper. Neither one keeps what they earned. Then you go home. Every bill you open has a government standing behind it with its hand out. You buy a house with money they already took their share of. Then they charge you property tax on it every year for the rest of your life. You want to renovate your own kitchen. You need a permit. You want to build a deck on your own land. You need a permit. You pay for the property. Then you pay for permission to use it. Stop paying property tax and they seize your home. Not because you missed a mortgage payment. Because you missed a payment to the government for the privilege of keeping what is already yours. You do not own your home. You rent it from the state. If you leave something behind for your children, they are taxed on what you were already taxed to earn. The same wealth. Taxed at every stage of your life. Then taxed one final time because you had the audacity to die. They found a way to monetize your absence. We are told this is the price of civilization. It is not. It is architecture. The most effective prison ever built is the one where the inmates believe they are free. They did not take your freedom. They priced you out of it. If you kept the full value of your labor, you would be free within years. Not decades. Years. The system cannot allow that. A machine built on consumption needs a consumer that never stops. You did not sign a social contract. You were assigned one. Now pay attention. They spent decades perfecting the extraction of your productivity. Now they are building the technology to replace you. AI is not coming for your job because corporations are greedy. It is coming because a system that already takes half your output just realized it can take all of it. Without needing you in the equation. You were never the point of this arrangement. You were the input. And the moment they engineer a cheaper one, you become a rounding error on a quarterly earnings call. They did not build AI to free you. They built it to finish what the tax code started. It was never about the tea. It was about the precedent. Today we hand over half our waking lives and thank them for the potholes. You do not live in a free economy. You live in a subscription you never signed up for. And the penalty for canceling is everything you have.

Dustin

27,945 views • 6 months ago

Farm animals don’t follow the loudest person. They follow the one who keeps showing up. Watch this long enough and you stop seeing “cute.” You start seeing a pattern. The goose that sneaks up on the chair. The sheep riding shotgun like it clocked in for the same shift. The calf that runs straight to the same pair of boots. None of that is random. Livestock remember who fed them when they were small, who didn’t flinch when they crowded the gate, and who talks to them like they have a name instead of a tag number. That’s why a farm dad ends up with a shadow. Not because he announced he was in charge. Because he was consistent when nobody was filming. City folks think the work is the tractor and the fence. The real job is being the person the animals decide is safe. Once they pick you, they don’t clock out. That’s the part I love about these clips. It isn’t a trick. It’s trust with feathers, wool, and hooves. Shorter version if you want it tighter: People think farm animals just wander. They don’t. They pick a person and they keep that job. The goose at the chair, the sheep in the passenger seat, the calf that runs straight to the same boots — that’s not chaos. That’s memory. They follow the one who showed up every morning with feed, a calm voice, and no performance. A farm doesn’t give you a title. The animals do. Optional light close (only if you want a faith beat): The quiet lesson in a clip like this is simple: consistency looks a lot like love. Animals notice it first. Keep hashtags light and relevant if you use them: #FarmLife #RanchLife #AnimalWisdom
1:15

Farm animals don’t follow the loudest person. They follow the one who keeps showing up. Watch this long enough and you stop seeing “cute.” You start seeing a pattern. The goose that sneaks up on the chair. The sheep riding shotgun like it clocked in for the same shift. The calf that runs straight to the same pair of boots. None of that is random. Livestock remember who fed them when they were small, who didn’t flinch when they crowded the gate, and who talks to them like they have a name instead of a tag number. That’s why a farm dad ends up with a shadow. Not because he announced he was in charge. Because he was consistent when nobody was filming. City folks think the work is the tractor and the fence. The real job is being the person the animals decide is safe. Once they pick you, they don’t clock out. That’s the part I love about these clips. It isn’t a trick. It’s trust with feathers, wool, and hooves. Shorter version if you want it tighter: People think farm animals just wander. They don’t. They pick a person and they keep that job. The goose at the chair, the sheep in the passenger seat, the calf that runs straight to the same boots — that’s not chaos. That’s memory. They follow the one who showed up every morning with feed, a calm voice, and no performance. A farm doesn’t give you a title. The animals do. Optional light close (only if you want a faith beat): The quiet lesson in a clip like this is simple: consistency looks a lot like love. Animals notice it first. Keep hashtags light and relevant if you use them: #FarmLife #RanchLife #AnimalWisdom

NancyH

59,899 views • 1 month ago

Mark Carney just got completely owned on stage by a Native Chief — and he had the exact same reaction he always has when things get real. He stared at the floor. Went silent. Couldn’t even respond like a leader. This is the same guy who’s barely in the House of Commons. The same guy who bolts the second the opposition starts pressing him. The same guy who dodges reporters like they’re carrying a disease. And the same guy who refuses to talk about the recession he helped create and is now trying to gaslight Canadians into believing is “technical.” He can jet around the world playing global statesman, but the second someone actually holds him accountable in his own country, he shrinks. This isn’t leadership. This is a guy who knows he can’t defend what he’s done to Canada. Drop a 🔥 if you’re sick of the disappearing act.
0:39

Mark Carney just got completely owned on stage by a Native Chief — and he had the exact same reaction he always has when things get real. He stared at the floor. Went silent. Couldn’t even respond like a leader. This is the same guy who’s barely in the House of Commons. The same guy who bolts the second the opposition starts pressing him. The same guy who dodges reporters like they’re carrying a disease. And the same guy who refuses to talk about the recession he helped create and is now trying to gaslight Canadians into believing is “technical.” He can jet around the world playing global statesman, but the second someone actually holds him accountable in his own country, he shrinks. This isn’t leadership. This is a guy who knows he can’t defend what he’s done to Canada. Drop a 🔥 if you’re sick of the disappearing act.

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

82,256 views • 4 months ago

This Is What War Does to a Man! Classic example of a soldier who might not be the best in barracks, but is rock solid under fire when you REALLY need to depend on him. — Before the War and After the War Are Two Different Men.
3:11

This Is What War Does to a Man! Classic example of a soldier who might not be the best in barracks, but is rock solid under fire when you REALLY need to depend on him. — Before the War and After the War Are Two Different Men.

Bez

227,726 views • 3 months ago

StableRonaldo says Isn’t taking a gambling deal the same thing?” after reacting to xQc’s take on streamers who do subathons 👀😳 “I love xQc but can I play a little bit of devil’s advocate here? And I know he’ll probably see this but like, bro, bro, that’s not the same. That’s not the same. Isn’t taking a gambling deal the same thing? At the end of the day, you get the money because they know people are gonna use their money to fund your gambling”
1:36

StableRonaldo says Isn’t taking a gambling deal the same thing?” after reacting to xQc’s take on streamers who do subathons 👀😳 “I love xQc but can I play a little bit of devil’s advocate here? And I know he’ll probably see this but like, bro, bro, that’s not the same. That’s not the same. Isn’t taking a gambling deal the same thing? At the end of the day, you get the money because they know people are gonna use their money to fund your gambling”

CoreBoysWorld 🌎

146,351 views • 1 month ago

🚨 THIS CAN’T BE LEAH REMINI — PEOPLE ARE CONVINCED SHE’S BEEN “REPLACED” AND THE INTERNET IS LOSING IT New images just surfaced and people are already confused. Not a double take. Not “she looks different.” Straight up: “Who is that?” This is supposed to be the same Leah Remini from King of Queens. The same woman who publicly went after Scientology. But people are saying her entire face looks different now. Not just aging. Not just styling. Something about it feels… off. Some say it’s just time and natural change. Others are going way further saying she looks “replaced.” Either way… the reaction is the same: People don’t recognize her anymore. Be honest… does this actually look like the same Leah to you?
1:53

🚨 THIS CAN’T BE LEAH REMINI — PEOPLE ARE CONVINCED SHE’S BEEN “REPLACED” AND THE INTERNET IS LOSING IT New images just surfaced and people are already confused. Not a double take. Not “she looks different.” Straight up: “Who is that?” This is supposed to be the same Leah Remini from King of Queens. The same woman who publicly went after Scientology. But people are saying her entire face looks different now. Not just aging. Not just styling. Something about it feels… off. Some say it’s just time and natural change. Others are going way further saying she looks “replaced.” Either way… the reaction is the same: People don’t recognize her anymore. Be honest… does this actually look like the same Leah to you?

HustleBitch

122,523 views • 6 months ago

This is the list of PIB-accredited channels. Neither Strike nor Pamphlet is listed here. If you are a researcher and anchor yourself, you should know that PIB accreditation is primarily for facilitating access to government events and official media interactions. It is not a licence to practise journalism, nor does it determine who is or isn’t a journalist. In India, there is no mandatory journalism degree or professional licence required to become a journalist. In that sense, journalism is one of the few professions where formal educational qualifications are not legally compulsory. Know the rules before lecturing others about journalism.
0:40

This is the list of PIB-accredited channels. Neither Strike nor Pamphlet is listed here. If you are a researcher and anchor yourself, you should know that PIB accreditation is primarily for facilitating access to government events and official media interactions. It is not a licence to practise journalism, nor does it determine who is or isn’t a journalist. In India, there is no mandatory journalism degree or professional licence required to become a journalist. In that sense, journalism is one of the few professions where formal educational qualifications are not legally compulsory. Know the rules before lecturing others about journalism.

Divya Gandotra Tandon

11,046 views • 19 days ago

🇮🇶🇮🇷|Grand Ayatollah Mohammad al-Yaqoubi has issued a fatwa: undermining Iran even with a single word is forbidden. In this confrontation, there is no room for neutrality. This is not a political statement. It is a religious ruling. It was issued by one of the most senior religious authorities in Najaf. It is addressed to all Iraqis especially those who remain silent. What did he say? The first point: Undermining the Islamic Republic, even with a single word, is forbidden. This means: You cannot criticize Iran. You cannot question Iran. You cannot spread doubt about Iran. You cannot aid the enemy's narrative. You cannot provide the enemy with ammunition. You cannot lend legitimacy to the siege. A single word. That is the threshold. You do not need to bomb Iran. You do not need to sanction Iran. You do not need to close airports. You need only utter a single word that weakens Iran. And that word is forbidden. The second point: We are facing a confrontation in which no neutrality is acceptable. This means: You cannot claim neutrality. You cannot claim detachment. You cannot claim equidistance. You cannot claim that both sides are the same. Because they are not the same. One side is the aggressor. One side is the victim. One side is an empire. One side is the resistance. To remain neutral in the face of aggression is complicity. To remain silent in the face of a siege is betrayal. To stand idly by while a Muslim nation is strangled is a sin. Why this is the ultimate argument against the silent The tradition of Najaf is quietism. Do not interfere in politics. Do not confront rulers. Do not take sides. Protect the seminary. Protect the institutions. Protect the community. Let politicians fight. Let rulers rule. Scholars pray, teach, and wait. Yaqoubi has just rejected that tradition. He says: This confrontation allows for no neutrality. You cannot sit on the fence. You cannot remain silent. You cannot claim to be above the fray. Because this is not a political dispute. This is an existential confrontation. This is a war against a Muslim nation. This is a blockade against a Muslim people. This is an attempt to strangle the Islamic Republic. If you do not stand with Iran, you stand against it. Who is he addressing? He is addressing those who remained silent when Iraqi airports were shut down. He is addressing those who say, "We do not meddle in politics." He is addressing those who submit to U.S. pressure and then pretend they are merely "obeying the law." He is addressing those who hold religious authority in Najaf, Karbala, Kufa, and Baghdad yet choose not to speak. He is saying: You have no right to remain silent. Your silence aids the enemy. Your silence allows the U.S. to turn Iraq into a base for besieging Iran. Your silence allows Muslims to be starved, blockaded, and isolated. Yet you are the heirs of Imam Ali. You are the followers of Hussein. You are the descendants of Karbala. You cannot remain silent. His fatwa states: ◽Undermining the Islamic Republic even with a single word is forbidden. ◽We face a confrontation in which no neutrality is acceptable. This is the ultimate argument for the silent. This is the final warning to the bystanders. This is the final call to Najaf. On the battlefield of truth versus falsehood, there is no room for bystanders.
0:43

🇮🇶🇮🇷|Grand Ayatollah Mohammad al-Yaqoubi has issued a fatwa: undermining Iran even with a single word is forbidden. In this confrontation, there is no room for neutrality. This is not a political statement. It is a religious ruling. It was issued by one of the most senior religious authorities in Najaf. It is addressed to all Iraqis especially those who remain silent. What did he say? The first point: Undermining the Islamic Republic, even with a single word, is forbidden. This means: You cannot criticize Iran. You cannot question Iran. You cannot spread doubt about Iran. You cannot aid the enemy's narrative. You cannot provide the enemy with ammunition. You cannot lend legitimacy to the siege. A single word. That is the threshold. You do not need to bomb Iran. You do not need to sanction Iran. You do not need to close airports. You need only utter a single word that weakens Iran. And that word is forbidden. The second point: We are facing a confrontation in which no neutrality is acceptable. This means: You cannot claim neutrality. You cannot claim detachment. You cannot claim equidistance. You cannot claim that both sides are the same. Because they are not the same. One side is the aggressor. One side is the victim. One side is an empire. One side is the resistance. To remain neutral in the face of aggression is complicity. To remain silent in the face of a siege is betrayal. To stand idly by while a Muslim nation is strangled is a sin. Why this is the ultimate argument against the silent The tradition of Najaf is quietism. Do not interfere in politics. Do not confront rulers. Do not take sides. Protect the seminary. Protect the institutions. Protect the community. Let politicians fight. Let rulers rule. Scholars pray, teach, and wait. Yaqoubi has just rejected that tradition. He says: This confrontation allows for no neutrality. You cannot sit on the fence. You cannot remain silent. You cannot claim to be above the fray. Because this is not a political dispute. This is an existential confrontation. This is a war against a Muslim nation. This is a blockade against a Muslim people. This is an attempt to strangle the Islamic Republic. If you do not stand with Iran, you stand against it. Who is he addressing? He is addressing those who remained silent when Iraqi airports were shut down. He is addressing those who say, "We do not meddle in politics." He is addressing those who submit to U.S. pressure and then pretend they are merely "obeying the law." He is addressing those who hold religious authority in Najaf, Karbala, Kufa, and Baghdad yet choose not to speak. He is saying: You have no right to remain silent. Your silence aids the enemy. Your silence allows the U.S. to turn Iraq into a base for besieging Iran. Your silence allows Muslims to be starved, blockaded, and isolated. Yet you are the heirs of Imam Ali. You are the followers of Hussein. You are the descendants of Karbala. You cannot remain silent. His fatwa states: ◽Undermining the Islamic Republic even with a single word is forbidden. ◽We face a confrontation in which no neutrality is acceptable. This is the ultimate argument for the silent. This is the final warning to the bystanders. This is the final call to Najaf. On the battlefield of truth versus falsehood, there is no room for bystanders.

Aprajita Nafs Nefes 🦋 Ancient Believer

11,233 views • 26 days ago

I would like to make a couple of points arguing against Salman Rushdie's points made in this interview. Number 1: What is wrong in being a Hindu Nationalist? Why can't a Hindu love his nation? I am a proud Indian Muslim Nationalist, so what do you make of that? Number 2: As you recorded this interview; the same week, in the state of Kerala, a Hindu Journalist Female News Anchor received a barrage of death threats, because all she did was to castigate the views of Kerala's most powerful Maulana who said women belong in their homes. As of today, a case has been registered, not against the political goons of the Political party cadres of the 'Muslim League' but against the Anchor, who is terrified. Also do brush up on the life and 24/7 security that Nupur Sharma lives in since last few years. So what was that worry again about Indian Secularism being in danger? Number 3: Jew hating and Hindu hating Mayor of New York, a performative Muslim identity clown, Mr Mamdani, who calls our Prime Minister a War criminal for Hindu-Muslim riots that took place in 2002, shows us through this statement why he can't be even taken seriously by a 2nd grader in India. Number 4: The Highest Court of Law in India, the Supreme Court did not find the then CM and now PM, Mr Modi guilty of any role in the 2002 Riots(which your clown calls a War). We go by the SC and not your feelings. Number 5: On your next visit to India, remember the security that the state of India will provide for you, is not to protect you from the Hindu Nationalists, but from those who you are forced to wear those glasses, which has one of your eyes covered with a black tinted frame.
2:53

I would like to make a couple of points arguing against Salman Rushdie's points made in this interview. Number 1: What is wrong in being a Hindu Nationalist? Why can't a Hindu love his nation? I am a proud Indian Muslim Nationalist, so what do you make of that? Number 2: As you recorded this interview; the same week, in the state of Kerala, a Hindu Journalist Female News Anchor received a barrage of death threats, because all she did was to castigate the views of Kerala's most powerful Maulana who said women belong in their homes. As of today, a case has been registered, not against the political goons of the Political party cadres of the 'Muslim League' but against the Anchor, who is terrified. Also do brush up on the life and 24/7 security that Nupur Sharma lives in since last few years. So what was that worry again about Indian Secularism being in danger? Number 3: Jew hating and Hindu hating Mayor of New York, a performative Muslim identity clown, Mr Mamdani, who calls our Prime Minister a War criminal for Hindu-Muslim riots that took place in 2002, shows us through this statement why he can't be even taken seriously by a 2nd grader in India. Number 4: The Highest Court of Law in India, the Supreme Court did not find the then CM and now PM, Mr Modi guilty of any role in the 2002 Riots(which your clown calls a War). We go by the SC and not your feelings. Number 5: On your next visit to India, remember the security that the state of India will provide for you, is not to protect you from the Hindu Nationalists, but from those who you are forced to wear those glasses, which has one of your eyes covered with a black tinted frame.

Khalid Baig

16,628 views • 1 month ago

IT'S ON A DAY LIKE THIS - set aside to commemorate and honour the selfless sacrifices of the heroes of Zimbabwe's liberation struggle - when compatriots with a revolutionary consciousness reaffirm the historical principle that, similar to the national liberation struggle on which it is based, the pursuit of the national interest is not PERSONAL, PARTISAN, TRIBAL or REGIONAL: it is NATIONAL. If your view of the national interest is personal, partisan, tribal or regional, then you are part of the problem; actually, you are not part of the problem; you are the problem!
0:44

IT'S ON A DAY LIKE THIS - set aside to commemorate and honour the selfless sacrifices of the heroes of Zimbabwe's liberation struggle - when compatriots with a revolutionary consciousness reaffirm the historical principle that, similar to the national liberation struggle on which it is based, the pursuit of the national interest is not PERSONAL, PARTISAN, TRIBAL or REGIONAL: it is NATIONAL. If your view of the national interest is personal, partisan, tribal or regional, then you are part of the problem; actually, you are not part of the problem; you are the problem!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

19,039 views • 2 years ago

.Scott Jennings on CBS cancelling ‘The Late Show with Stephen Colbert’: “Look at the reporting on this on and off the record. Executives all over are saying we had to do it for financial reasons. This is a massive show with a massive staff. It’s losing a massive amount of money. This is the nature of the TV business right now. You just are not economically viable. If you’re supposed to be doing a comedy show, that’s not funny, that’s losing $50 million a year. I mean, only — only liberals, extreme liberals would think that we have to keep subsidizing partisan rants every night that are economically not viable just because. Why? It makes absolutely no financial sense. He works for a for-profit company. Don’t you have to turn a profit at some juncture? And he’s not doing it. And you know, there’s a lot of people in this general business right now who think that I exist to go after Donald Trump at all costs, But no one stops to think, do I exist to make money or not? Maybe these things aren’t compatible When you cut out half the country from your possible audience.”
1:05

.Scott Jennings on CBS cancelling ‘The Late Show with Stephen Colbert’: “Look at the reporting on this on and off the record. Executives all over are saying we had to do it for financial reasons. This is a massive show with a massive staff. It’s losing a massive amount of money. This is the nature of the TV business right now. You just are not economically viable. If you’re supposed to be doing a comedy show, that’s not funny, that’s losing $50 million a year. I mean, only — only liberals, extreme liberals would think that we have to keep subsidizing partisan rants every night that are economically not viable just because. Why? It makes absolutely no financial sense. He works for a for-profit company. Don’t you have to turn a profit at some juncture? And he’s not doing it. And you know, there’s a lot of people in this general business right now who think that I exist to go after Donald Trump at all costs, But no one stops to think, do I exist to make money or not? Maybe these things aren’t compatible When you cut out half the country from your possible audience.”

Curtis Houck

407,455 views • 1 year ago

You live in your new posh flat in Noida or Navi Mumbai. Super proud. Happy that you contributed to and benefited from a resurgent India. In a dingy room of a madarsa in Dhaka, there is a stand alone computer. A young bearded man is maintaining a database on it. Carefully mapping locations, people, jobs, affiliations. One of the entries is your new flat. That information was provided by your maid who told you she is from Murshidabad. This is what they did to Israelis who hired Palestinian maids. You are your own enemy.
1:29

You live in your new posh flat in Noida or Navi Mumbai. Super proud. Happy that you contributed to and benefited from a resurgent India. In a dingy room of a madarsa in Dhaka, there is a stand alone computer. A young bearded man is maintaining a database on it. Carefully mapping locations, people, jobs, affiliations. One of the entries is your new flat. That information was provided by your maid who told you she is from Murshidabad. This is what they did to Israelis who hired Palestinian maids. You are your own enemy.

Eminent Intellectual

590,298 views • 1 year ago