Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Samurai animation comparison: Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol. Both outputs made with Seedance 2.0.

higgsfield_ai's profile picture

Higgsfield AI 🧩

211,202 subscribers

39,172 просмотров • 17 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

More action scenes from the Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol eval set. Both generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:13

More action scenes from the Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol eval set. Both generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

63,341 просмотров • 17 дней назад

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.
0:16

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.

Abhishek

146,652 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same dinosaur animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.
0:16

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same dinosaur animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.

Abhishek

92,135 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Model comparison: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in a game POV edition generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:11

Model comparison: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in a game POV edition generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

37,992 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Action scene comparison of GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5, generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:12

Action scene comparison of GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5, generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

24,258 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Model eval round: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5. Rendered with Seedance 2.0.
0:14

Model eval round: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5. Rendered with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

32,379 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Comparison in cartoon animation created with Arcads
0:12

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Comparison in cartoon animation created with Arcads

arcads AI

30,288 просмотров • 21 дней назад

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.
0:12

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.

Design Arena

22,294 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4
0:13

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4

GMI Cloud

24,233 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs GPT Images 2.0, both fed into Seedance 2.0.
0:12

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs GPT Images 2.0, both fed into Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

92,415 просмотров • 26 дней назад

Curious about GPT-5.6 Sol's design intelligence? Here's an output comparison between GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
0:12

Curious about GPT-5.6 Sol's design intelligence? Here's an output comparison between GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol

Design Arena

66,672 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads
0:14

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads

Romain Torres

2,106,218 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2
0:14

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2

Shara I Ai Video Creator

13,710 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both were animated with Seedance 2.0. Check replies to find the prompt 🧵
0:12

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both were animated with Seedance 2.0. Check replies to find the prompt 🧵

Higgsfield AI 🧩

37,876 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP
0:13

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP

Romain Torres

187,375 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2 Prompt below:
0:13

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2 Prompt below:

Shara

17,353 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

gpt 5.6 + seedance 2.0 is a cheat code I gave GPT-5.6 Sol a simple idea, and it created a detailed prompt for this fight scene. The motion came out incredibly smooth, and I’m really happy with the result. Prompt below ↓
0:13

gpt 5.6 + seedance 2.0 is a cheat code I gave GPT-5.6 Sol a simple idea, and it created a detailed prompt for this fight scene. The motion came out incredibly smooth, and I’m really happy with the result. Prompt below ↓

Kiki

21,329 просмотров • 20 дней назад

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.
0:13

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

468,127 просмотров • 19 дней назад

Redefining 'personalized shopping' with GPT-5.6-sol
0:16

Redefining 'personalized shopping' with GPT-5.6-sol

Sarah Chieng

247,855 просмотров • 21 дней назад

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.
0:13

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

Bhavy☄️

34,045 просмотров • 16 дней назад