Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

SANJAY SINGH REFUSES TO LET THIS SLIDE 🔥 ANCHOR: You have directly opened a front against a judge. SANJAY SINGH: A judge has a code of conduct too. If a judge speaks from a political platform, isn’t that against judicial dignity? ANCHOR: Is this against the entire judiciary? SANJAY... show more

Mr Sharma

18,453 subscribers

71,282 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

SANJAY SINGH SHOWED REAL CLASS HERE 🫡 ANCHOR: People say only you turned out right. What about Raghav, Swati and Harbhajan? SANJAY SINGH 🙏: I have a principle. I do not speak against people I have worked with. ANCHOR: But they have separated from you. SANJAY SINGH 🙌: We shared good and bad times. They may turn against us. I still won’t speak against them. ANCHOR: What about others? SANJAY SINGH 🔥: Prashant Bhushan, YoYa, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Kiran Bedi, Anna ji. I never said a word against anyone. Politics needs this rare thing: grace. 💥

SANJAY SINGH SHOWED REAL CLASS HERE 🫡 ANCHOR: People say only you turned out right. What about Raghav, Swati and Harbhajan? SANJAY SINGH 🙏: I have a principle. I do not speak against people I have worked with. ANCHOR: But they have separated from you. SANJAY SINGH 🙌: We shared good and bad times. They may turn against us. I still won’t speak against them. ANCHOR: What about others? SANJAY SINGH 🔥: Prashant Bhushan, YoYa, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Kiran Bedi, Anna ji. I never said a word against anyone. Politics needs this rare thing: grace. 💥

Mr Sharma

146,002 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Trump: We are going to continue our fight against this judge. We think he’s totally conflicted. He’s a conflicted judge. There’s never been a judge more conflicted than this one.. We think we have a very conflicted, highly conflicted judge… he’s rushing this trial

Trump: We are going to continue our fight against this judge. We think he’s totally conflicted. He’s a conflicted judge. There’s never been a judge more conflicted than this one.. We think we have a very conflicted, highly conflicted judge… he’s rushing this trial

Acyn

721,668 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Alphabet's Google won't have to sell its Chrome browser, a federal judge ruled in a landmark antitrust case against the internet and search giant. Mandeep Singh of Bloomberg Intelligence has more on the breaking news

Alphabet's Google won't have to sell its Chrome browser, a federal judge ruled in a landmark antitrust case against the internet and search giant. Mandeep Singh of Bloomberg Intelligence has more on the breaking news

Bloomberg TV

19,926 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

SANJAY SINGH DROPS THE RAM MANDIR LAND DOCUMENT 🔥 ANCHOR: You are saying land worth ₹2.92 crore was bought for almost ₹24 crore? SANJAY SINGH 🎯: This is Gata number 247. The land value was ₹2.92 crore. Champat Rai bought it for ₹23.61 crore, plus ₹1.65 crore stamp duty. ANCHOR: And your bigger allegation? SANJAY SINGH 😳: This was not private money. This was money donated by crores of Hindus for Lord Ram’s temple. ANCHOR: What makes this land deal more serious? SANJAY SINGH 🔥: The SDM certified on 22 July 2024 that this was nazul land. Nazul land cannot be bought or sold. Then how did Champat Rai buy it?

SANJAY SINGH DROPS THE RAM MANDIR LAND DOCUMENT 🔥 ANCHOR: You are saying land worth ₹2.92 crore was bought for almost ₹24 crore? SANJAY SINGH 🎯: This is Gata number 247. The land value was ₹2.92 crore. Champat Rai bought it for ₹23.61 crore, plus ₹1.65 crore stamp duty. ANCHOR: And your bigger allegation? SANJAY SINGH 😳: This was not private money. This was money donated by crores of Hindus for Lord Ram’s temple. ANCHOR: What makes this land deal more serious? SANJAY SINGH 🔥: The SDM certified on 22 July 2024 that this was nazul land. Nazul land cannot be bought or sold. Then how did Champat Rai buy it?

Mr Sharma

146,993 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

VIDEO | AAP leader Sanjay Singh (Sanjay Singh AAP) in a press conference alleges voter applications in large numbers from one premises of many BJP leaders. There has been a row between AAP and BJP related to voters list for the Delhi elections. #DelhiElections2025

VIDEO | AAP leader Sanjay Singh (Sanjay Singh AAP) in a press conference alleges voter applications in large numbers from one premises of many BJP leaders. There has been a row between AAP and BJP related to voters list for the Delhi elections. #DelhiElections2025

Press Trust of India

11,729 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Atishi with a glass of water protesting against lack of water. Sanjay Singh wears a waist coat while the temperature is 47 degrees. Air coolers at protest sites ! AAP is BAAP of all DRAMA

Atishi with a glass of water protesting against lack of water. Sanjay Singh wears a waist coat while the temperature is 47 degrees. Air coolers at protest sites ! AAP is BAAP of all DRAMA

Pawan Durani

386,176 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

THIS IS A WAKE-UP CALL FOR JUDICIARY 🔥 KAPIL SIBAL: A judge shouldn’t decide recusal from his own view, but from the litigant’s fear of bias. That’s the law. VIVEK TANKHA: That should be the end of it. A judge should never insist on hearing that case. KAPIL SIBAL: ED once said they didn’t trust a judge, and the judge recused. VIVEK TANKHA: ED can get recusal. No one else can. We all know why. High time the third pillar introspects.

THIS IS A WAKE-UP CALL FOR JUDICIARY 🔥 KAPIL SIBAL: A judge shouldn’t decide recusal from his own view, but from the litigant’s fear of bias. That’s the law. VIVEK TANKHA: That should be the end of it. A judge should never insist on hearing that case. KAPIL SIBAL: ED once said they didn’t trust a judge, and the judge recused. VIVEK TANKHA: ED can get recusal. No one else can. We all know why. High time the third pillar introspects.

Mr Sharma

106,485 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."

Press Trust of India

99,583 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

We demanded an enquiry against Judge Rita Kaushik at Jaunpur Court. Judicial immunity has nothing to do with corruption charges or allegations. If there are such serious allegation of demanding bribe by a Judge then truth must come out. #ArrestRitaKaushik

Sensitive content

We demanded an enquiry against Judge Rita Kaushik at Jaunpur Court. Judicial immunity has nothing to do with corruption charges or allegations. If there are such serious allegation of demanding bribe by a Judge then truth must come out. #ArrestRitaKaushik

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

87,672 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

THIS IS PURE CASE CLOSURE 🔥 SANDEEP: You are making baseless allegations against a man who gave his whole life to the Sangh and the Ram Mandir. SANJAY SINGH 🎯: Then is he a naive child? In 2021, land bought for Rs 2 crore was sold to Champat Rai five minutes later for Rs 18.5 crore. SANDEEP: If the Trust approved it, what is Champat Rai’s fault? SANJAY SINGH ⚡️: Is this his private money? Is the Trust his private property? Crores of Hindus donated in Lord Ram’s name. Was that money given to be looted? SANDEEP: Documents were burnt. How does that prove corruption? SANJAY SINGH 🔥: If your stolen watch is recovered from someone, the thief is proven. Rs 15 lakh was recovered from one house, Rs 5 lakh from another. Then why no FIR?

THIS IS PURE CASE CLOSURE 🔥 SANDEEP: You are making baseless allegations against a man who gave his whole life to the Sangh and the Ram Mandir. SANJAY SINGH 🎯: Then is he a naive child? In 2021, land bought for Rs 2 crore was sold to Champat Rai five minutes later for Rs 18.5 crore. SANDEEP: If the Trust approved it, what is Champat Rai’s fault? SANJAY SINGH ⚡️: Is this his private money? Is the Trust his private property? Crores of Hindus donated in Lord Ram’s name. Was that money given to be looted? SANDEEP: Documents were burnt. How does that prove corruption? SANJAY SINGH 🔥: If your stolen watch is recovered from someone, the thief is proven. Rs 15 lakh was recovered from one house, Rs 5 lakh from another. Then why no FIR?

Mr Sharma

118,094 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ANJANA’S FAILED ATTEMPT TO SAVE BJP 🔥 ANJANA: It is about quoting word to word… SANJAY SINGH 🎯: Do you think the country is stupid? ANJANA: But the wording matters. SANJAY SINGH ⚡️: We are not children. India is the world’s largest democracy, not a country that can be fooled with technicalities.

ANJANA’S FAILED ATTEMPT TO SAVE BJP 🔥 ANJANA: It is about quoting word to word… SANJAY SINGH 🎯: Do you think the country is stupid? ANJANA: But the wording matters. SANJAY SINGH ⚡️: We are not children. India is the world’s largest democracy, not a country that can be fooled with technicalities.

Mr Sharma

136,228 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Judge Juan Merchan has ordered Donald Trump to be sentenced for 34 counts on January 10th ahead of inauguration Judge Merchan was never supposed to oversee Donald Trump’s case, he was specifically assigned the case to weaponize our legal system against Trump, here’s the proof “Understand there's absolutely no reason that Judge Merchan should have even had a chance to be assigned to this case? Now, I'm sure the left is just gonna call this a conspiracy theory. ‌ So I'll issue a challenge to them, and maybe they can tell me how he managed to be the judge. Because for these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. ‌ That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. So even though they're trying to claim that they didn't pick the judge, that it was randomly assigned, that's not possible because judge Merchan isn't in the pool to be randomly assigned. So the only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. ‌ And the wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. ‌ So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats. ‌ But, yeah, I'm sure this was just a coincidence. It was a coincidence that one of the most high profile cases ever, we didn't assign a judge, we assigned an acting judge. ‌ And that that judge somehow got selected even though he wasn't in the pool of judges available to be selected, and that that same judge that was selected also caught 2 other Trump related cases in the same year, and then that judge's daughter makes tens of millions of dollars a year promoting Democrats. Yeah. I'm sure that's all a coincidence.”

Wall Street Apes

514,459 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“I think that the attacks against the judiciary are only getting worse. What I am seeing now is far different than what I have seen in the past,” says Judge Esther Salas, a federal district court judge in New Jersey.

“I think that the attacks against the judiciary are only getting worse. What I am seeing now is far different than what I have seen in the past,” says Judge Esther Salas, a federal district court judge in New Jersey.

60 Minutes

26,950 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Trump’s $10 BILLION lawsuit against his own government just hit a wall. A federal judge says the case looks collusive, raising serious concerns that Trump is trying to use the courts to get a payout from the Treasury Department. Now the judge is demanding answers, ordering Trump or his administration essentially to explain why this isn’t a fraud on the court. One possible outcome? The judge could pause the entire case until Trump leaves office—so that a real adversarial process can exist.

Trump’s $10 BILLION lawsuit against his own government just hit a wall. A federal judge says the case looks collusive, raising serious concerns that Trump is trying to use the courts to get a payout from the Treasury Department. Now the judge is demanding answers, ordering Trump or his administration essentially to explain why this isn’t a fraud on the court. One possible outcome? The judge could pause the entire case until Trump leaves office—so that a real adversarial process can exist.

MeidasTouch

374,420 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

THIS IS ABSOLUTE CINEMA 🔥 ADM: You cannot hold this discussion here. SANJAY SINGH 🎯: Show me the rule. Where is it written that we need permission to talk inside a conference hall? ADM: This meeting is not allowed. SANJAY SINGH ⚡️: Is any anti-national discussion happening here? We are discussing paper leaks, the same exams that made you ADM, SSP, IG and DGP. ADM left the chat.

THIS IS ABSOLUTE CINEMA 🔥 ADM: You cannot hold this discussion here. SANJAY SINGH 🎯: Show me the rule. Where is it written that we need permission to talk inside a conference hall? ADM: This meeting is not allowed. SANJAY SINGH ⚡️: Is any anti-national discussion happening here? We are discussing paper leaks, the same exams that made you ADM, SSP, IG and DGP. ADM left the chat.

Mr Sharma

32,312 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: On AAP national convenor Arvind Kejriwal’s letter to Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma and refusing to appear in person or through a lawyer for the hearing in the Delhi excise policy case, Former Uttarakhand High Court Judge, Justice Lok Pal Singh says, "It is unfortunate on his part. He made false allegations against the judge... He should not move such letters... Once his application has been discussed, he should have availed the legal remedy in the court... It will become a trend to make allegations against a particular judge, run away from the court and delay the hearing of the case."

#WATCH | Delhi: On AAP national convenor Arvind Kejriwal’s letter to Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma and refusing to appear in person or through a lawyer for the hearing in the Delhi excise policy case, Former Uttarakhand High Court Judge, Justice Lok Pal Singh says, "It is unfortunate on his part. He made false allegations against the judge... He should not move such letters... Once his application has been discussed, he should have availed the legal remedy in the court... It will become a trend to make allegations against a particular judge, run away from the court and delay the hearing of the case."

ANI

28,656 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten