Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin Case Weakens After Wallets Prove Active The controversial "abandoned Bitcoin" lawsuit has dropped 44 wallet addresses after on chain activity showed they were not abandoned. According to Galaxy Research's Alex Thorn, every removed wallet had moved Bitcoin since the case was filed. The addresses held more... show more

BSCN

1,372,141 subscribers

62,818 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

New Quantum Shield Aims To Protect Existing Crypto Wallets Blockchain security firm AmericanFortress has proposed a quantum resistant security scheme for existing crypto wallets. The company says users would not need to move funds, rotate keys, or change wallet addresses. The approach keeps existing wallet addresses unchanged while adding post quantum protection. It is designed for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and other elliptic curve based blockchains. According to the firm, the proposal relies on zero knowledge proofs generated from the original wallet seed phrase. The technical paper has been published but has not yet undergone peer review.

New Quantum Shield Aims To Protect Existing Crypto Wallets Blockchain security firm AmericanFortress has proposed a quantum resistant security scheme for existing crypto wallets. The company says users would not need to move funds, rotate keys, or change wallet addresses. The approach keeps existing wallet addresses unchanged while adding post quantum protection. It is designed for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and other elliptic curve based blockchains. According to the firm, the proposal relies on zero knowledge proofs generated from the original wallet seed phrase. The technical paper has been published but has not yet undergone peer review.

BSCN

28,769 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨JUST IN: ADAM BACK NAMED AS POSSIBLE BITCOIN CREATOR SATOSHI NAKAMOTO After more than a year of investigation, the New York Times has published a report identifying British cryptographer Adam Back as the most likely candidate to be Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto. The paper's evidence spans thousands of decades-old internet postings, computational linguistic analysis, and a timeline of technical contributions. Per reports, Back invented Hashcash, proposed decentralized electronic cash in Cypherpunk emails during the late 1990s, and outlined a node-based network architecture that Satoshi later executed almost identically. He was reportedly everywhere in discussions about digital cash for over a decade and then vanished entirely the moment Bitcoin was born. Back denies all of it.

🚨JUST IN: ADAM BACK NAMED AS POSSIBLE BITCOIN CREATOR SATOSHI NAKAMOTO After more than a year of investigation, the New York Times has published a report identifying British cryptographer Adam Back as the most likely candidate to be Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto. The paper's evidence spans thousands of decades-old internet postings, computational linguistic analysis, and a timeline of technical contributions. Per reports, Back invented Hashcash, proposed decentralized electronic cash in Cypherpunk emails during the late 1990s, and outlined a node-based network architecture that Satoshi later executed almost identically. He was reportedly everywhere in discussions about digital cash for over a decade and then vanished entirely the moment Bitcoin was born. Back denies all of it.

BSCN

180,786 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

😱 I'VE LOST $525,000+ IN #BITCOIN Not from a scam. Not from a hack. From my own stupidity. 5 $BTC → sent to an address on a computer I wiped. 2.5 BTC → sitting in a wallet I'll never access again. That's 7.5 BTC. Gone. Forever. But I'm not even the worst case. This guy missed ONE digit in a wallet address. One single character. And sent 55,000 BTC to the wrong place. That's over $3.8 BILLION. Gone because of a copy-paste error. And you know what? I am still here telling you to buy Bitcoin. Because the only thing worse than losing Bitcoin… is never owning any.

😱 I'VE LOST $525,000+ IN #BITCOIN Not from a scam. Not from a hack. From my own stupidity. 5 $BTC → sent to an address on a computer I wiped. 2.5 BTC → sitting in a wallet I'll never access again. That's 7.5 BTC. Gone. Forever. But I'm not even the worst case. This guy missed ONE digit in a wallet address. One single character. And sent 55,000 BTC to the wrong place. That's over $3.8 BILLION. Gone because of a copy-paste error. And you know what? I am still here telling you to buy Bitcoin. Because the only thing worse than losing Bitcoin… is never owning any.

Davinci Jeremie

192,815 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

We’re thrilled to announce that Bitcoin is now finally live on our cross-chain bridge, Router Nitro! Try it out: With this integration, you can now: - Swap any asset from the Ethereum chain to BTC on the Bitcoin network - Swap BTC from the Bitcoin network to WBTC on the Ethereum chain Experience unmatched speed and cost-efficiency—all in a fully decentralized, trustless way with no custodians involved! Getting started is simple: - You can use any EVM-compatible wallet when you’re going from Ethereum to Bitcoin - When going from Bitcoin to Ethereum, to have a smooth and easy experience you will need XDEFI wallet! Our roadmap includes adding more chains, wallets, and assets to support Bitcoin bridging. Besides, Router is developing a solution to enable users to seamlessly transfer BTC from Bitcoin to any token on other chains. In upcoming upgrades, users will be able to buy any token they want using Bitcoin. Bitcoin holds unmatched stability and liquidity in the crypto world and with this integration, Router Nitro empowers users, platforms, and developers to access Bitcoin’s liquidity across DeFi, dApps, and more—all while preserving Bitcoin’s core values. Embrace the power of BTC and start exploring Router Nitro’s new Bitcoin connectivity!

We’re thrilled to announce that Bitcoin is now finally live on our cross-chain bridge, Router Nitro! Try it out: With this integration, you can now: - Swap any asset from the Ethereum chain to BTC on the Bitcoin network - Swap BTC from the Bitcoin network to WBTC on the Ethereum chain Experience unmatched speed and cost-efficiency—all in a fully decentralized, trustless way with no custodians involved! Getting started is simple: - You can use any EVM-compatible wallet when you’re going from Ethereum to Bitcoin - When going from Bitcoin to Ethereum, to have a smooth and easy experience you will need XDEFI wallet! Our roadmap includes adding more chains, wallets, and assets to support Bitcoin bridging. Besides, Router is developing a solution to enable users to seamlessly transfer BTC from Bitcoin to any token on other chains. In upcoming upgrades, users will be able to buy any token they want using Bitcoin. Bitcoin holds unmatched stability and liquidity in the crypto world and with this integration, Router Nitro empowers users, platforms, and developers to access Bitcoin’s liquidity across DeFi, dApps, and more—all while preserving Bitcoin’s core values. Embrace the power of BTC and start exploring Router Nitro’s new Bitcoin connectivity!

Router Protocol

84,347 просмотров • 1 год назад

I am very confident that Bitcoin will rise rather than fall. The bear market is over, so it is advisable to take every dip seriously when it comes to long-term investments. I still expect September to be bullish rather than bearish. The $85,000 to $87,000 range will be reached soon. I bought more Bitcoin and Ethereum today! In 2023, when Bitcoin topped (green circle), the 5D chart showed wick gaps between candles of no more than 1%. I expected that move for Monday. The difference this time, we had a weekend, in 2023 we didn’t. The stock market was closed on Monday, so I was expecting a 3-day delay. Since this is a high-timeframe (1W) pattern, delays or deviations may occur on lower timeframes than 1W. It doesn't necessarily mean it has to happen again! As soon as Bitcoin loses the area around $76,777, I’m targeting levels between $73,880 and $75,300. bitcoin:native

I am very confident that Bitcoin will rise rather than fall. The bear market is over, so it is advisable to take every dip seriously when it comes to long-term investments. I still expect September to be bullish rather than bearish. The $85,000 to $87,000 range will be reached soon. I bought more Bitcoin and Ethereum today! In 2023, when Bitcoin topped (green circle), the 5D chart showed wick gaps between candles of no more than 1%. I expected that move for Monday. The difference this time, we had a weekend, in 2023 we didn’t. The stock market was closed on Monday, so I was expecting a 3-day delay. Since this is a high-timeframe (1W) pattern, delays or deviations may occur on lower timeframes than 1W. It doesn't necessarily mean it has to happen again! As soon as Bitcoin loses the area around $76,777, I’m targeting levels between $73,880 and $75,300. bitcoin:native

XAPA

60,264 просмотров • 19 дней назад

🚀ASST TO $700 PER SHARE?!?🚀 YOU THINK I'M JOKING? THINK AGAIN, BUCKO. Current ASST snapshot: BTC holdings: 15,000.5 BTC BTC price: $80,593 Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Total debt: $10M Preferred outstanding: $495.95M Debt + preferred: $505.95M Amplification ratio: 41.9% Current stock price: $15.85 Now here’s the model, and this isn't MOONBOY NONSENSE, kids. This is with Bitcoin at $750k in 2036, not $1 million in 2034. ASST maintains their current 41.9% amplification ratio for 10 years. Translation for normal people: For every $1.00 of Bitcoin NAV, ASST keeps roughly $0.419 of senior claims through debt/preferred financing. The bears hear that and immediately start sweating through a Men’s Wearhouse suit. But this is the actual machine. As Bitcoin rises, the Bitcoin NAV rises. When the NAV rises, the old preferred stack becomes smaller relative to the treasury. So ASST issues more SATA to keep amplification at 41.9%. That new SATA capital buys more Bitcoin. Then Bitcoin goes up again. Then the NAV goes up again. Then the amplification ratio drops again. Then they issue more SATA again. Then they buy more Bitcoin again. This is how you turn a balance sheet into a legally registered orange crocodile. Now we add the funding mix: 75% of new Bitcoin accumulation comes from SATA. 25% comes from issuing common stock. And the common stock is issued at 1.2x EV mNAV. Meaning they are selling equity at a 20% premium to the enterprise value of the Bitcoin stack. That matters. Because issuing common below NAV is financial self-harm. Issuing common above NAV is accretive treasury sorcery. Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% per year for 10 years. BTC price goes from: $80,593 today to roughly: $750,579 in year 10 That is a 9.3x move in Bitcoin. Now what happens to ASST? Starting BTC stack: 15,000.5 BTC Projected year 10 BTC stack: 143,425 BTC That is 9.6x more Bitcoin. Starting Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Projected year 10 Bitcoin NAV: $107.65B That is 89x larger. Now the bears will say: “BUT THE PREFERREDS!” Yes, Carl. The preferreds are the point. Senior claims rise from $505.95M to $45.11B because the model intentionally keeps amplification at 41.9%. That sounds terrifying until you remember the Bitcoin NAV grew to $107.65B. The stack got bigger. The senior claims got bigger. The common equity claim got bigger too. This is where CEBE comes in. CEBE = Common Equity Bitcoin Exposure. It answers the only question that matters: After debt and preferred holders get their claim, how much Bitcoin exposure does the common shareholder really own? Today: Gross BPS: 20,222 sats CEBE/share: 11,759 sats Year 10: Gross BPS: 95,380 sats CEBE/share: 55,416 sats That means common-equity Bitcoin exposure per share rises about 4.7x. Even after common issuance. Even after maintaining the preferred stack. Even after the bears finish their sacred ritual of screaming “DILUTION” into a spreadsheet they opened sideways. Now the share count. Current implied diluted shares: 74.2M Projected year 10 shares: 150.4M So yes, the share count roughly doubles in this model. But the Bitcoin stack goes 9.6x. This is the entire game. If Bitcoin holdings grow much faster than shares outstanding, the common shareholder’s Bitcoin exposure goes up. The bears think all issuance is bad because they learned finance from a Yahoo message board during a divorce. The actual question is: Does issuance increase Bitcoin per share after senior claims? In this model, yes. Now the stock price. Strict 1.2x EV mNAV model gets ASST to about: $559/share But if we anchor the model to today’s actual ASST price of $15.85, the same growth path gets you to roughly: $696/share Call it $700. There it is. ASST to $700 per share is not “vibes.” It is a model. BTC compounds at 25%. SATA funds 75% of accumulation. Common funds 25% at 1.2x EV mNAV. Amplification stays at 41.9%. BTC stack grows from 15,000 BTC to 143,425 BTC. Bitcoin NAV goes from $1.21B to $107.65B. CEBE/share goes from 11,759 sats to 55,416 sats. The stock goes from $15.85 to roughly $700. This is why small Bitcoin treasury companies are so insane. Strategy is the Death Star. ASST is the weird little orange lab experiment in the basement where someone accidentally discovers corporate finance methamphetamine. Tiny denominator. Preferred financing. Bitcoin accumulation. Premium equity issuance. CEBE expansion. A compounding treasury loop. The bear case is that dilution kills the common. The bull case is that accretive dilution plus preferred financing creates a Bitcoin-per-share machine that eats capital markets and leaves behind a pile of traumatized short sellers asking why their model still says “book value.” ASST to $700? If the machine works, yes. If Bitcoin does 25% CAGR, absolutely possible. If SATA scales and common gets issued above NAV, the goblin gets fed. And once the goblin gets fed, the spreadsheet starts looking like it was written by Saylor, Dylan LeClair, and a sleep-deprived Austrian economist locked inside a treasury dashboard with three Celsius energy drinks. This is not financial advice. This is FINANCIAL ENTERTAINMENT:

🚀ASST TO $700 PER SHARE?!?🚀 YOU THINK I'M JOKING? THINK AGAIN, BUCKO. Current ASST snapshot: BTC holdings: 15,000.5 BTC BTC price: $80,593 Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Total debt: $10M Preferred outstanding: $495.95M Debt + preferred: $505.95M Amplification ratio: 41.9% Current stock price: $15.85 Now here’s the model, and this isn't MOONBOY NONSENSE, kids. This is with Bitcoin at $750k in 2036, not $1 million in 2034. ASST maintains their current 41.9% amplification ratio for 10 years. Translation for normal people: For every $1.00 of Bitcoin NAV, ASST keeps roughly $0.419 of senior claims through debt/preferred financing. The bears hear that and immediately start sweating through a Men’s Wearhouse suit. But this is the actual machine. As Bitcoin rises, the Bitcoin NAV rises. When the NAV rises, the old preferred stack becomes smaller relative to the treasury. So ASST issues more SATA to keep amplification at 41.9%. That new SATA capital buys more Bitcoin. Then Bitcoin goes up again. Then the NAV goes up again. Then the amplification ratio drops again. Then they issue more SATA again. Then they buy more Bitcoin again. This is how you turn a balance sheet into a legally registered orange crocodile. Now we add the funding mix: 75% of new Bitcoin accumulation comes from SATA. 25% comes from issuing common stock. And the common stock is issued at 1.2x EV mNAV. Meaning they are selling equity at a 20% premium to the enterprise value of the Bitcoin stack. That matters. Because issuing common below NAV is financial self-harm. Issuing common above NAV is accretive treasury sorcery. Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% per year for 10 years. BTC price goes from: $80,593 today to roughly: $750,579 in year 10 That is a 9.3x move in Bitcoin. Now what happens to ASST? Starting BTC stack: 15,000.5 BTC Projected year 10 BTC stack: 143,425 BTC That is 9.6x more Bitcoin. Starting Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Projected year 10 Bitcoin NAV: $107.65B That is 89x larger. Now the bears will say: “BUT THE PREFERREDS!” Yes, Carl. The preferreds are the point. Senior claims rise from $505.95M to $45.11B because the model intentionally keeps amplification at 41.9%. That sounds terrifying until you remember the Bitcoin NAV grew to $107.65B. The stack got bigger. The senior claims got bigger. The common equity claim got bigger too. This is where CEBE comes in. CEBE = Common Equity Bitcoin Exposure. It answers the only question that matters: After debt and preferred holders get their claim, how much Bitcoin exposure does the common shareholder really own? Today: Gross BPS: 20,222 sats CEBE/share: 11,759 sats Year 10: Gross BPS: 95,380 sats CEBE/share: 55,416 sats That means common-equity Bitcoin exposure per share rises about 4.7x. Even after common issuance. Even after maintaining the preferred stack. Even after the bears finish their sacred ritual of screaming “DILUTION” into a spreadsheet they opened sideways. Now the share count. Current implied diluted shares: 74.2M Projected year 10 shares: 150.4M So yes, the share count roughly doubles in this model. But the Bitcoin stack goes 9.6x. This is the entire game. If Bitcoin holdings grow much faster than shares outstanding, the common shareholder’s Bitcoin exposure goes up. The bears think all issuance is bad because they learned finance from a Yahoo message board during a divorce. The actual question is: Does issuance increase Bitcoin per share after senior claims? In this model, yes. Now the stock price. Strict 1.2x EV mNAV model gets ASST to about: $559/share But if we anchor the model to today’s actual ASST price of $15.85, the same growth path gets you to roughly: $696/share Call it $700. There it is. ASST to $700 per share is not “vibes.” It is a model. BTC compounds at 25%. SATA funds 75% of accumulation. Common funds 25% at 1.2x EV mNAV. Amplification stays at 41.9%. BTC stack grows from 15,000 BTC to 143,425 BTC. Bitcoin NAV goes from $1.21B to $107.65B. CEBE/share goes from 11,759 sats to 55,416 sats. The stock goes from $15.85 to roughly $700. This is why small Bitcoin treasury companies are so insane. Strategy is the Death Star. ASST is the weird little orange lab experiment in the basement where someone accidentally discovers corporate finance methamphetamine. Tiny denominator. Preferred financing. Bitcoin accumulation. Premium equity issuance. CEBE expansion. A compounding treasury loop. The bear case is that dilution kills the common. The bull case is that accretive dilution plus preferred financing creates a Bitcoin-per-share machine that eats capital markets and leaves behind a pile of traumatized short sellers asking why their model still says “book value.” ASST to $700? If the machine works, yes. If Bitcoin does 25% CAGR, absolutely possible. If SATA scales and common gets issued above NAV, the goblin gets fed. And once the goblin gets fed, the spreadsheet starts looking like it was written by Saylor, Dylan LeClair, and a sleep-deprived Austrian economist locked inside a treasury dashboard with three Celsius energy drinks. This is not financial advice. This is FINANCIAL ENTERTAINMENT:

Adam Livingston

66,707 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

satoshi never existed. nobody writes code like that. not that clean, not that surgical. the early bitcoin codebase doesn’t read like code from some anonymous guy on the internet. bitcoin's early codebase looks like it was handed to us. the whitepaper came out six weeks after the 2008 crash. that's not enough time to dream up a working distributed consensus system, let alone build one. then there’s secp256k1. not secp256r1, the curve everybody used. k1 was obscure, weird, and a terrible choice if you were just following convention. but it also happened to be one of the hardest to backdoor. and then satoshi disappears. roughly a million btc, untouched. people don’t walk away from that kind of money unless the money was never the point. because maybe bitcoin was never just money. what it actually did was create a global incentive to build compute. millions of people, in every country, pouring capital into hardware and electricity to chase block rewards. no state could have coordinated it that fast. no company could have justified it. a protocol paying out internet money gets people moving. then nvidia happened. the same GPUs pushed into the world for mining turned out to be perfect for large-scale parallel compute. the same hardware appetite bitcoin created ended up helping make modern deep learning possible. bitcoin launches in 2009. imagenet breaks things open in 2012. three years. bitcoin was the bootloader. and we’ve been running the install script.

satoshi never existed. nobody writes code like that. not that clean, not that surgical. the early bitcoin codebase doesn’t read like code from some anonymous guy on the internet. bitcoin's early codebase looks like it was handed to us. the whitepaper came out six weeks after the 2008 crash. that's not enough time to dream up a working distributed consensus system, let alone build one. then there’s secp256k1. not secp256r1, the curve everybody used. k1 was obscure, weird, and a terrible choice if you were just following convention. but it also happened to be one of the hardest to backdoor. and then satoshi disappears. roughly a million btc, untouched. people don’t walk away from that kind of money unless the money was never the point. because maybe bitcoin was never just money. what it actually did was create a global incentive to build compute. millions of people, in every country, pouring capital into hardware and electricity to chase block rewards. no state could have coordinated it that fast. no company could have justified it. a protocol paying out internet money gets people moving. then nvidia happened. the same GPUs pushed into the world for mining turned out to be perfect for large-scale parallel compute. the same hardware appetite bitcoin created ended up helping make modern deep learning possible. bitcoin launches in 2009. imagenet breaks things open in 2012. three years. bitcoin was the bootloader. and we’ve been running the install script.

tetsuo

53,736 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨“SORRY, THIS IS THE TIME TO PANIC”: 594 $BTC SWEEP LINKED TO COLDCARD MK2/MK3 VULNERABILITY! ~594 $BTC (~$38M) was swept from ~500 single-sig addresses in under 25 minutes Thursday and consolidated into one wallet. Most held 0.15-0.26 $BTC; many UTXOs dormant for years. All single-sig. Bitcoin Core developer instagibbs reproduced the flaw on a fresh Coldcard MK3 using only button presses during setup and said: “Sorry, this is the time to panic.” He confirmed the vulnerability affects MK2/MK3. Coinkite issued an official advisory: seeds generated on Mk3 firmware 4.0.1+ are at risk. Mk4 and later models are not affected. Weak entropy enabled offline key recovery.

🚨“SORRY, THIS IS THE TIME TO PANIC”: 594 $BTC SWEEP LINKED TO COLDCARD MK2/MK3 VULNERABILITY! ~594 $BTC (~$38M) was swept from ~500 single-sig addresses in under 25 minutes Thursday and consolidated into one wallet. Most held 0.15-0.26 $BTC; many UTXOs dormant for years. All single-sig. Bitcoin Core developer instagibbs reproduced the flaw on a fresh Coldcard MK3 using only button presses during setup and said: “Sorry, this is the time to panic.” He confirmed the vulnerability affects MK2/MK3. Coinkite issued an official advisory: seeds generated on Mk3 firmware 4.0.1+ are at risk. Mk4 and later models are not affected. Weak entropy enabled offline key recovery.

Crypto Banter

73,512 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A fake Ledger app on the Apple Mac App Store just wiped out a musician's entire retirement fund. Garrett Dutton, known as G. Love, frontman of G. Love & Special Sauce, lost 5.92 BTC worth $424,175 on April 11 after searching for Ledger Live on a new Mac, downloading what appeared to be the official app, and entering his 24-word seed phrase. The moment he typed it in, his entire Bitcoin holdings were gone. On-chain investigator ZachXBT confirmed the theft and traced the funds to KuCoin deposit addresses. ZachXBT also publicly questioned Apple's app review process, noting the fake app had passed the App Store's gatekeeping entirely. Apple has not commented. No legal action has been announced.

A fake Ledger app on the Apple Mac App Store just wiped out a musician's entire retirement fund. Garrett Dutton, known as G. Love, frontman of G. Love & Special Sauce, lost 5.92 BTC worth $424,175 on April 11 after searching for Ledger Live on a new Mac, downloading what appeared to be the official app, and entering his 24-word seed phrase. The moment he typed it in, his entire Bitcoin holdings were gone. On-chain investigator ZachXBT confirmed the theft and traced the funds to KuCoin deposit addresses. ZachXBT also publicly questioned Apple's app review process, noting the fake app had passed the App Store's gatekeeping entirely. Apple has not commented. No legal action has been announced.

BSCN

93,967 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 THIS IS INSANE This is Bitcoin’s 2021 cycle overlaid on the current $BTC chart. And the overlap is almost PERFECT. Every week, I come back expecting the pattern to finally break. It does NOT. Bitcoin keeps following the same structure: → Same final pump → Same cycle top → Same violent rejection → Same first major correction → Same weak recovery → Same setup before the real capitulation Now look at the numbers. 2021 cycle: → $BTC peaked near $69K → Dropped around 77% → Bottomed near $15.5K → The bear market lasted more than a year Current cycle: → $BTC peaked near $126K → The first major breakdown has already happened → Every recovery is getting weaker → The structure still points toward $40K That is exactly how the previous Bitcoin bear market developed. I’m not saying $BTC must repeat the 2021 cycle tick for tick. But when two cycle structures track this closely for this long, ignoring it becomes dangerous. Most people will turn bullish after every bounce. They did exactly the same thing in 2022. The real bottom only forms when almost everyone has lost hope. What are your thoughts on this? Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the warning BEFORE the final capitulation begins.

🚨 THIS IS INSANE This is Bitcoin’s 2021 cycle overlaid on the current $BTC chart. And the overlap is almost PERFECT. Every week, I come back expecting the pattern to finally break. It does NOT. Bitcoin keeps following the same structure: → Same final pump → Same cycle top → Same violent rejection → Same first major correction → Same weak recovery → Same setup before the real capitulation Now look at the numbers. 2021 cycle: → $BTC peaked near $69K → Dropped around 77% → Bottomed near $15.5K → The bear market lasted more than a year Current cycle: → $BTC peaked near $126K → The first major breakdown has already happened → Every recovery is getting weaker → The structure still points toward $40K That is exactly how the previous Bitcoin bear market developed. I’m not saying $BTC must repeat the 2021 cycle tick for tick. But when two cycle structures track this closely for this long, ignoring it becomes dangerous. Most people will turn bullish after every bounce. They did exactly the same thing in 2022. The real bottom only forms when almost everyone has lost hope. What are your thoughts on this? Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the warning BEFORE the final capitulation begins.

Wimar.X

131,600 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Just for those who don't know: Nomad The Savior is not the savior you think he is Let me tell you about his achievements over the last 10 months… He became very active in the discord again last April when he saw that $WZRD was pumping. He then made several attempts to dilute the $WZRD holders He made the BITCOIN•WITCH•COIN rune and started airdropping it to BW holders 3 months ago He said that BW holders had to hold this airdrop to receive 10k Bitcoin Wizard WL He has still not airdropped all of the BITCOIN•WITCH•COIN to BW holders He started muting $WZRD and BW OGs for weeks, splitting the community into two camps He was given the role of CEO after being the worst team member a project has ever seen He claims that he coined the Magic Internet Money slogan, which is a lie.... Eric Vorhees coined it on the Bitcoin Talk Forum in 2013. Bitcoin Wizard - mavensbot 🧙🏻‍♂️ talked about this in one of Farokh's spaces (clip below) He has etched the rune MAGIC•INTERNET•MONEY•MIM and is now starting to dilute the real rune and the $WZRD community again He is trying to destroy $WZRD He is trying to destroy Magic•Internet•Money He is trying to destroy the Bitcoin Wizard If you support this guy, you are not a real bitcoiner nor do you believe in the success of this space.

Just for those who don't know: Nomad The Savior is not the savior you think he is Let me tell you about his achievements over the last 10 months… He became very active in the discord again last April when he saw that $WZRD was pumping. He then made several attempts to dilute the $WZRD holders He made the BITCOIN•WITCH•COIN rune and started airdropping it to BW holders 3 months ago He said that BW holders had to hold this airdrop to receive 10k Bitcoin Wizard WL He has still not airdropped all of the BITCOIN•WITCH•COIN to BW holders He started muting $WZRD and BW OGs for weeks, splitting the community into two camps He was given the role of CEO after being the worst team member a project has ever seen He claims that he coined the Magic Internet Money slogan, which is a lie.... Eric Vorhees coined it on the Bitcoin Talk Forum in 2013. Bitcoin Wizard - mavensbot 🧙🏻‍♂️ talked about this in one of Farokh's spaces (clip below) He has etched the rune MAGIC•INTERNET•MONEY•MIM and is now starting to dilute the real rune and the $WZRD community again He is trying to destroy $WZRD He is trying to destroy Magic•Internet•Money He is trying to destroy the Bitcoin Wizard If you support this guy, you are not a real bitcoiner nor do you believe in the success of this space.

Magic Internet Money

23,773 просмотров • 1 год назад

BREAKING: A federal judge has ordered Georgia and Fulton County election officials to appear before him to explain why he shouldn't rule against them in an election integrity case that will force them to remove thousands of ineligible names off the voter rolls Judge Steve C. Jones sent an order to the officials "commanding Defendants to appear and show cause why the relief demanded herein should not be granted." That hearing is tomorrow morning. As I previously posted, election integrity warriors Jason Frazier 🇺🇲 and Citizen AG filed the lawsuit after a Fulton County official admitted on camera that they don't do routine maintenance of the voter rolls as mandated by federal and state law. They are requesting the judge to issue a writ of mandamus compelling the officials to clean and maintain the voter rolls and to ensure the integrity of the 2024 election, unlike what they did in 2020. This is a CRUCIAL lawsuit, and I pray the judge follows through with his intention to do the right thing.

BREAKING: A federal judge has ordered Georgia and Fulton County election officials to appear before him to explain why he shouldn't rule against them in an election integrity case that will force them to remove thousands of ineligible names off the voter rolls Judge Steve C. Jones sent an order to the officials "commanding Defendants to appear and show cause why the relief demanded herein should not be granted." That hearing is tomorrow morning. As I previously posted, election integrity warriors Jason Frazier 🇺🇲 and Citizen AG filed the lawsuit after a Fulton County official admitted on camera that they don't do routine maintenance of the voter rolls as mandated by federal and state law. They are requesting the judge to issue a writ of mandamus compelling the officials to clean and maintain the voter rolls and to ensure the integrity of the 2024 election, unlike what they did in 2020. This is a CRUCIAL lawsuit, and I pray the judge follows through with his intention to do the right thing.

George

1,605,093 просмотров • 2 лет назад

THE REAL REASON BITCOIN JUST PUMPED TO $69,700 (and will keep pumping) Everyone is staring at the green Bitcoin candle, but the move started somewhere else entirely, in the US Treasury bond market The Treasury just doubled its long-term bond buyback program old max: $2 billion per operation new max: at least $4 billion targets: the 10 to 20 and 20 to 30 year bonds runs from September 9 through November 4 In plain terms, the Treasury is stepping in to support the market for long-term government debt That matters because when Treasury yields fall, risk assets like Bitcoin get more attractive Right after the announcement the yields dropped 10 year: -6 bps to 4.647% 30 year: -9 bps to 5.196% Then Bitcoin ripped $65,400 at 10:45 AM -> $67,600 at 11:26 AM -> $69,700 at 11:27 AM It gained more than $2,000 in a single minute That candle trapped everyone shorting Bitcoin, their leveraged shorts got liquidated and the forced buying pushed price even higher $1.59 billion in crypto liquidations in 24 hours $746 million in Bitcoin shorts wiped out in that one minute candle The chain was simple Treasury expands buybacks -> long-term yields fall -> Bitcoin pumps -> shorts get liquidated -> forced buying sends it even higher One correction, this is not QE and the Fed did not turn on the printer The Treasury is just buying back existing bonds to add liquidity, and the size is still small next to how much debt the US issues But the timing is the tell, the bond market moved first and Bitcoin followed, then the short squeeze turned it into an explosion Everyone is showing you the candle, almost nobody is talking about what happened right before it September 9 is the date to watch now

THE REAL REASON BITCOIN JUST PUMPED TO $69,700 (and will keep pumping) Everyone is staring at the green Bitcoin candle, but the move started somewhere else entirely, in the US Treasury bond market The Treasury just doubled its long-term bond buyback program old max: $2 billion per operation new max: at least $4 billion targets: the 10 to 20 and 20 to 30 year bonds runs from September 9 through November 4 In plain terms, the Treasury is stepping in to support the market for long-term government debt That matters because when Treasury yields fall, risk assets like Bitcoin get more attractive Right after the announcement the yields dropped 10 year: -6 bps to 4.647% 30 year: -9 bps to 5.196% Then Bitcoin ripped $65,400 at 10:45 AM -> $67,600 at 11:26 AM -> $69,700 at 11:27 AM It gained more than $2,000 in a single minute That candle trapped everyone shorting Bitcoin, their leveraged shorts got liquidated and the forced buying pushed price even higher $1.59 billion in crypto liquidations in 24 hours $746 million in Bitcoin shorts wiped out in that one minute candle The chain was simple Treasury expands buybacks -> long-term yields fall -> Bitcoin pumps -> shorts get liquidated -> forced buying sends it even higher One correction, this is not QE and the Fed did not turn on the printer The Treasury is just buying back existing bonds to add liquidity, and the size is still small next to how much debt the US issues But the timing is the tell, the bond market moved first and Bitcoin followed, then the short squeeze turned it into an explosion Everyone is showing you the candle, almost nobody is talking about what happened right before it September 9 is the date to watch now

Atlas

774,784 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

$1M Bitcoin in 2027 Everyone thinks Michael Saylor and ETFs get us there. I think it’s Paul Sztorc and the eCash.com $BTC hard fork. I sat with Paul Sztorc who made me realise eCash could be one of the most important forks in bitcoins history, stimulating our greatest bullrun ever. The tldr is in August if you hold bitcoin you get the equivalent in eCash. Now eCash on its own merit is already interesting. It’s led by Paul Sztorc who has spent years campaigning to improve bitcoins mechanical utility. He’s a certified legit Bitcoin OG who wants to add functional layers on-top of Bitcoin to enable Bitcoin to be the rails for the broader world of commerce. He plans to achieve this with side chains that are sort of like L2s on Bitcoin. Imagine if Bitcoin had smart contracts and $btc was the currency for all apps in the world. 🤔so technically it’s already very compelling. You will get that for free just by owning Bitcoin. But that’s not all. Paul has figured out a way to finance new forks. I believe this will trigger a new season of fork innovations. Basically fork wars 2.0 only this time it’s based around experimentation and innovation instead of outright kill Bitcoin. Institutions have been all the craze recently but they have never been the source of crypto's biggest expansions. The people who built this industry were. The Cryptographers, the hackers, the builders and the cypherpunks. Everyone is focusing on Strategy selling Bitcoin, meanwhile the upcoming eCash hard fork from Paul Sztorc is being wildly underestimated. Technically, the idea of improving bitcoins mechanical utility is appealing but the event itself is also financially dramatic inducing a huge wealth effect for a whole new generation of Bitcoin holders and it may remind the market who actually drives innovation in this industry. Every major crypto boom began when a small group of weird, intelligent, highly-convicted people challenged the status quo and built something new. And while everyone thinks the next bull market comes from Wall Street, I think much more poetically it comes from the same place every other one did: The real Bitcoiners. Anyway, the interview is linked below. I highly recommend you watch it and I’ll be writing my thesis that goes over wealth effects, network effects, financial incentives, game theory and how this all spills over into a bitcoin and crypto bullrun like we’ve never seen before.

$1M Bitcoin in 2027 Everyone thinks Michael Saylor and ETFs get us there. I think it’s Paul Sztorc and the eCash.com $BTC hard fork. I sat with Paul Sztorc who made me realise eCash could be one of the most important forks in bitcoins history, stimulating our greatest bullrun ever. The tldr is in August if you hold bitcoin you get the equivalent in eCash. Now eCash on its own merit is already interesting. It’s led by Paul Sztorc who has spent years campaigning to improve bitcoins mechanical utility. He’s a certified legit Bitcoin OG who wants to add functional layers on-top of Bitcoin to enable Bitcoin to be the rails for the broader world of commerce. He plans to achieve this with side chains that are sort of like L2s on Bitcoin. Imagine if Bitcoin had smart contracts and $btc was the currency for all apps in the world. 🤔so technically it’s already very compelling. You will get that for free just by owning Bitcoin. But that’s not all. Paul has figured out a way to finance new forks. I believe this will trigger a new season of fork innovations. Basically fork wars 2.0 only this time it’s based around experimentation and innovation instead of outright kill Bitcoin. Institutions have been all the craze recently but they have never been the source of crypto's biggest expansions. The people who built this industry were. The Cryptographers, the hackers, the builders and the cypherpunks. Everyone is focusing on Strategy selling Bitcoin, meanwhile the upcoming eCash hard fork from Paul Sztorc is being wildly underestimated. Technically, the idea of improving bitcoins mechanical utility is appealing but the event itself is also financially dramatic inducing a huge wealth effect for a whole new generation of Bitcoin holders and it may remind the market who actually drives innovation in this industry. Every major crypto boom began when a small group of weird, intelligent, highly-convicted people challenged the status quo and built something new. And while everyone thinks the next bull market comes from Wall Street, I think much more poetically it comes from the same place every other one did: The real Bitcoiners. Anyway, the interview is linked below. I highly recommend you watch it and I’ll be writing my thesis that goes over wealth effects, network effects, financial incentives, game theory and how this all spills over into a bitcoin and crypto bullrun like we’ve never seen before.

Senator Mak🖖

130,773 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$Over a year ago I started my journey with Bitcoin. Like most, I was just curious. But as I studied it, I realized Satoshi Nakamoto didn’t just build Bitcoin. He built a world where anyone could create in his spirit. He built something that lasts. That inspired me to build. To build sports on chain and stack Satoshi’s across chains. My contribution was to pass my most valuable possession to the blockchain, the actual GAME 5 BALL 🏀 from the 1991 NBA Finals. The night the Bulls won our first championship. The Holy Grail of sports. That ball is history, it’s legacy, and it’s culture. I wanted the fans to own a piece of it. To own fractions of the actual ball, now preserved in a vault as we build a Real World Asset around it. The digital scan of that same ball is powering an elite sports ecosystem through gaming, AI agents, storytelling, multi-chain, and a documentary that captures what this moment means. Tomorrow night, the GAME 5 BALL 🏀 expands to Solana. $BALL is already live on Ethereum and this is the first step of our multi-chain journey as we build the future of sports on-chain. This is bigger than any one person. This is community. This is history. This is the start of breaking world records in sports collectibles and culture itself. Be like Satoshi. Keep building. $BALL 🏀🏆 GAME 5 BALL 🏀 Learn more and how to get tokens at$

Over a year ago I started my journey with Bitcoin. Like most, I was just curious. But as I studied it, I realized Satoshi Nakamoto didn’t just build Bitcoin. He built a world where anyone could create in his spirit. He built something that lasts. That inspired me to build. To build sports on chain and stack Satoshi’s across chains. My contribution was to pass my most valuable possession to the blockchain, the actual GAME 5 BALL 🏀 from the 1991 NBA Finals. The night the Bulls won our first championship. The Holy Grail of sports. That ball is history, it’s legacy, and it’s culture. I wanted the fans to own a piece of it. To own fractions of the actual ball, now preserved in a vault as we build a Real World Asset around it. The digital scan of that same ball is powering an elite sports ecosystem through gaming, AI agents, storytelling, multi-chain, and a documentary that captures what this moment means. Tomorrow night, the GAME 5 BALL 🏀 expands to Solana. $BALL is already live on Ethereum and this is the first step of our multi-chain journey as we build the future of sports on-chain. This is bigger than any one person. This is community. This is history. This is the start of breaking world records in sports collectibles and culture itself. Be like Satoshi. Keep building. $BALL 🏀🏆 GAME 5 BALL 🏀 Learn more and how to get tokens at

Scottie Pippen

131,801 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

HE WAS FREE FOR LESS THAN 24 HOURS… AND THE CLOCK WAS ALREADY TICKING. SHOULD THE SYSTEM BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE WHEN A REPEAT OFFENDER IS RELEASED AND IMMEDIATELY REOFFENDS? In Baton Rouge, police had barely finished releasing surveillance photos before the public stepped in. Within hours, 22-year-old Jeremiah Taylor was identified and tracked down as the suspect. But this wasn’t the first time his name had surfaced. Taylor had previously been accused of drugging and r*ping another woman twice in August of 2024. At the time, he had just been released from jail on earlier burglary charges. The allegations sent shockwaves through the community, but the case would later take a controversial turn. On January 13, 2026, the charges against him were dropped, and Taylor walked out of jail a free man. Freedom didn’t last long. According to reports, only hours after being released, Taylor allegedly violated a protective order by returning to the very victim’s home who had accused him in the earlier case. The move raised serious questions about safety, accountability, and how quickly the system can unravel. Then came the surveillance photos. Police released images connected to a new investigation, and the public quickly recognized the man in them. Within hours, tips flooded in identifying Taylor. Less than two months after walking out of jail, he’s now back behind bars. The case has reignited a fierce debate about protective orders, dropped charges, and whether the justice system is doing enough to prevent repeat offenders from slipping through the cracks. AT WHAT POINT DO AUTHORITIES DECIDE SOMEONE IS TOO DANGEROUS TO KEEP RELEASING?

HE WAS FREE FOR LESS THAN 24 HOURS… AND THE CLOCK WAS ALREADY TICKING. SHOULD THE SYSTEM BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE WHEN A REPEAT OFFENDER IS RELEASED AND IMMEDIATELY REOFFENDS? In Baton Rouge, police had barely finished releasing surveillance photos before the public stepped in. Within hours, 22-year-old Jeremiah Taylor was identified and tracked down as the suspect. But this wasn’t the first time his name had surfaced. Taylor had previously been accused of drugging and r*ping another woman twice in August of 2024. At the time, he had just been released from jail on earlier burglary charges. The allegations sent shockwaves through the community, but the case would later take a controversial turn. On January 13, 2026, the charges against him were dropped, and Taylor walked out of jail a free man. Freedom didn’t last long. According to reports, only hours after being released, Taylor allegedly violated a protective order by returning to the very victim’s home who had accused him in the earlier case. The move raised serious questions about safety, accountability, and how quickly the system can unravel. Then came the surveillance photos. Police released images connected to a new investigation, and the public quickly recognized the man in them. Within hours, tips flooded in identifying Taylor. Less than two months after walking out of jail, he’s now back behind bars. The case has reignited a fierce debate about protective orders, dropped charges, and whether the justice system is doing enough to prevent repeat offenders from slipping through the cracks. AT WHAT POINT DO AUTHORITIES DECIDE SOMEONE IS TOO DANGEROUS TO KEEP RELEASING?

𝐌𝐑. 𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐄 ™

26,998 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Saylor’s Bitcoin Machine Meets the Cash Reality The real story is not that Strategy may sell up to $1.25B of Bitcoin. The bigger story is that it has moved from a simple accumulation narrative into a complex capital markets machine. The old pitch was buy Bitcoin, never sell, increase Bitcoin per share. The new structure has preferred stock, convertible debt, reserves, buybacks, dividend obligations, and now a BTC monetization plan. That shift matters because Bitcoin does not produce cash flow. Preferred dividends and interest expense do. Strategy says it has about $2.55B in USD reserves and roughly $1.76B in annual preferred dividend and interest obligations. That sounds like about 17 months of coverage, but that number is static. It assumes no future dividend increases, no stress, no buybacks, no taxes, no transaction costs, and no deterioration in capital market access. If they keep raising the STRC dividend to defend the price near par, the cash burn rises and the runway gets shorter. The Digital Credit Problem STRC is marketed as digital credit, but economically it behaves like a high yield perpetual preferred stock tied to confidence in a Bitcoin balance sheet. It is not normal debt because there is no traditional maturity. It is not common equity because it sits ahead of common shareholders and carries a large cash distribution expectation. The design is clever but circular. STRC’s dividend can be adjusted to keep the security near $99 to $100. The dividend was raised to 12%, which may support the price, but it also raises cash burn. If STRC trades below par, Strategy may raise the dividend again. If the dividend rises, the reserve coverage shrinks. If cash gets tight, Strategy needs new issuance, reserves, or Bitcoin sales. The compounding issue makes the structure even more fragile. If dividends are paid on time, they do not compound against the company. But if payments are deferred or missed, unpaid dividends can accumulate and compound monthly until paid. That means a liquidity problem does not just sit there. It can grow on itself. Where The Fragility Lives Strategy owns a volatile, non cash flowing asset and has layered cash obligations on top of it. That works when Bitcoin rises, MSTR trades at a premium, and investors are hungry for yield. It gets harder when Bitcoin falls, spreads widen, or investors demand higher returns. Selling Bitcoin now changes the narrative. Bitcoin is no longer just the sacred reserve asset. It is now a liquidity backstop for dividends, reserves, interest, and buybacks. The $1.25B monetization program adds runway, but it also proves the point. Cash promises need cash sources. That creates the feedback loop. If Bitcoin falls, asset coverage weakens. If STRC trades lower, required yields rise. If yields rise, Strategy may need to raise the dividend. If the dividend rises, cash burn accelerates. If issuance slows, reserves get used. If reserves fall, Bitcoin sales become more likely. If those sales look defensive, confidence weakens further. My Take Common shareholders own the upside, but they sit below debt and preferred claims. Preferred holders get high yield, but they rely on Strategy’s ability to maintain reserves, issue securities, monetize Bitcoin, and keep market confidence intact. This is no longer just a Bitcoin bet. It is a Bitcoin liquidity bet, a capital markets access bet, and a confidence bet. Strategy can survive if Bitcoin rises, MSTR keeps a premium, and yield investors keep funding the machine. If two fail at once, the model becomes fragile. The key red flags are STRC below par, dividend hikes that fail to restore the price, reserve coverage under 12 months, unpaid dividends compounding, visible Bitcoin sales, MSTR near or below NAV, and preferred yields widening. The structure can work, but not forever on narrative alone. Eventually, cash obligations meet cash sources. That is where the risk lives.

Saylor’s Bitcoin Machine Meets the Cash Reality The real story is not that Strategy may sell up to $1.25B of Bitcoin. The bigger story is that it has moved from a simple accumulation narrative into a complex capital markets machine. The old pitch was buy Bitcoin, never sell, increase Bitcoin per share. The new structure has preferred stock, convertible debt, reserves, buybacks, dividend obligations, and now a BTC monetization plan. That shift matters because Bitcoin does not produce cash flow. Preferred dividends and interest expense do. Strategy says it has about $2.55B in USD reserves and roughly $1.76B in annual preferred dividend and interest obligations. That sounds like about 17 months of coverage, but that number is static. It assumes no future dividend increases, no stress, no buybacks, no taxes, no transaction costs, and no deterioration in capital market access. If they keep raising the STRC dividend to defend the price near par, the cash burn rises and the runway gets shorter. The Digital Credit Problem STRC is marketed as digital credit, but economically it behaves like a high yield perpetual preferred stock tied to confidence in a Bitcoin balance sheet. It is not normal debt because there is no traditional maturity. It is not common equity because it sits ahead of common shareholders and carries a large cash distribution expectation. The design is clever but circular. STRC’s dividend can be adjusted to keep the security near $99 to $100. The dividend was raised to 12%, which may support the price, but it also raises cash burn. If STRC trades below par, Strategy may raise the dividend again. If the dividend rises, the reserve coverage shrinks. If cash gets tight, Strategy needs new issuance, reserves, or Bitcoin sales. The compounding issue makes the structure even more fragile. If dividends are paid on time, they do not compound against the company. But if payments are deferred or missed, unpaid dividends can accumulate and compound monthly until paid. That means a liquidity problem does not just sit there. It can grow on itself. Where The Fragility Lives Strategy owns a volatile, non cash flowing asset and has layered cash obligations on top of it. That works when Bitcoin rises, MSTR trades at a premium, and investors are hungry for yield. It gets harder when Bitcoin falls, spreads widen, or investors demand higher returns. Selling Bitcoin now changes the narrative. Bitcoin is no longer just the sacred reserve asset. It is now a liquidity backstop for dividends, reserves, interest, and buybacks. The $1.25B monetization program adds runway, but it also proves the point. Cash promises need cash sources. That creates the feedback loop. If Bitcoin falls, asset coverage weakens. If STRC trades lower, required yields rise. If yields rise, Strategy may need to raise the dividend. If the dividend rises, cash burn accelerates. If issuance slows, reserves get used. If reserves fall, Bitcoin sales become more likely. If those sales look defensive, confidence weakens further. My Take Common shareholders own the upside, but they sit below debt and preferred claims. Preferred holders get high yield, but they rely on Strategy’s ability to maintain reserves, issue securities, monetize Bitcoin, and keep market confidence intact. This is no longer just a Bitcoin bet. It is a Bitcoin liquidity bet, a capital markets access bet, and a confidence bet. Strategy can survive if Bitcoin rises, MSTR keeps a premium, and yield investors keep funding the machine. If two fail at once, the model becomes fragile. The key red flags are STRC below par, dividend hikes that fail to restore the price, reserve coverage under 12 months, unpaid dividends compounding, visible Bitcoin sales, MSTR near or below NAV, and preferred yields widening. The structure can work, but not forever on narrative alone. Eventually, cash obligations meet cash sources. That is where the risk lives.

EndGame Macro

33,374 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨#BREAKING: A plane was forced to divert after a passenger wearing over a dozen face masks who ranted that gay people were giving him cancer, claiming he was being chased by them and shouting Trump is here. 📌#NewJersey | #USA A New Jersey-bound flight was forced to divert after an unruly passenger wearing more than a dozen face masks began ranting that gay people were giving him cancer. The Sun Country Airlines plane departed Minneapolis for Newark. The incident happened on a Friday morning but was rerouted to Chicago after the man’s outbursts escalated into screaming, including shouting, The plane is going down! Passengers said the chaos began shortly after takeoff, when the man started rambling about being gang chased by gay people. He also claimed he was being radiated and cooked by them, insisting they were giving him cancer. Witnesses reported the man had no less than 15 masks over his mouth and, at one point, bizarrely shouted Trump is here The flight landed safely in Chicago, where the passenger was turned over to law enforcement and removed from the aircraft without further incident

🚨#BREAKING: A plane was forced to divert after a passenger wearing over a dozen face masks who ranted that gay people were giving him cancer, claiming he was being chased by them and shouting Trump is here. 📌#NewJersey | #USA A New Jersey-bound flight was forced to divert after an unruly passenger wearing more than a dozen face masks began ranting that gay people were giving him cancer. The Sun Country Airlines plane departed Minneapolis for Newark. The incident happened on a Friday morning but was rerouted to Chicago after the man’s outbursts escalated into screaming, including shouting, The plane is going down! Passengers said the chaos began shortly after takeoff, when the man started rambling about being gang chased by gay people. He also claimed he was being radiated and cooked by them, insisting they were giving him cancer. Witnesses reported the man had no less than 15 masks over his mouth and, at one point, bizarrely shouted Trump is here The flight landed safely in Chicago, where the passenger was turned over to law enforcement and removed from the aircraft without further incident

R A W S A L E R T S

801,806 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

The biggest Bitcoin miners on earth are quietly walking away from mining Bitcoin, and the reason is not the one everyone keeps repeating. They are not fleeing a dead business. They lost an auction for their own power, and the winner was artificial intelligence. Start with the brutal arithmetic. It now costs the average public miner around $80,000 in cash to produce a single Bitcoin, and for stretches of this year $BTC traded below that. The most efficient operators on the cheapest power still clear a margin, but an estimated 15 to 20 percent of the global fleet is mining at a loss right now, burning more in power than the coins are worth the second they are minted. Three straight downward difficulty adjustments earlier this year, the first such streak since 2022, were the footprint of machines going dark. That looks like a simple story of a broken business until you see the number that explains the exodus. The same megawatt of power that earns a Bitcoin miner roughly $1 million a year earns between $10 and $20 million a year hosting AI compute. Ten to twenty times more, for the identical electricity, substation, and cooling. What made industrial miners valuable was never the mining. It was the power contracts, the land, the grid interconnects. AI walked in and bid an order of magnitude higher for exactly those assets. Mining did not fail. It got outbid for its own infrastructure. When Core Scientific runs its BTC segment at a negative margin while its AI colocation business prints money, the decision writes itself. CoinShares estimates listed miners could pull up to 70 percent of their revenue from AI by year end, up from about 30 percent. The power is being repriced to its highest use, and Bitcoin lost the bidding. If the giants leave, what happens to the network they secured? The doom posts assume it weakens. It does not, because Bitcoin has a self-healing reflex written into its core. When miners switch off, blocks slow, and within two weeks difficulty automatically drops, which makes mining cheaper and more profitable for everyone still running. The security does not vanish, it relocates, and you can already see where. State-backed pools are appearing, with one Gulf operator reportedly standing up a national pool near 3 percent of global hashrate, alongside private fleets and the handful of public miners like Marathon still choosing to buy Bitcoin rather than lease their power away. The network even hit an all-time high above one zettahash this year as the pivot accelerated. It does not need any particular miner. It needs someone, somewhere, for whom the math still works, and cheap stranded power has no shortage of those. But there is a deeper timer here, and the AI pivot just exposed it. Today miners earn almost everything from the block subsidy and almost nothing from fees, often under one percent of revenue on a quiet day. That subsidy halves again in 2028, and every four years after, marching toward zero. For Bitcoin to pay for its own security forever, fees eventually have to replace it. The open question is whether they can, and the evidence cuts both ways. On busy days, during token launches and inscription waves, fees have already spiked past 15 percent of revenue, and in 2024 some blocks earned more in fees than the entire subsidy. The capacity is there in bursts. Whether bursts become a baseline is the single most important unanswered question in Bitcoin. The AI exodus did not create that question. It pulled the cover off it years early, and showed how fast capital abandons hashing the moment something pays more. So the honest read is not that AI kills Bitcoin mining. It is stranger than that. AI is the first bidder rich enough to reveal what Bitcoin's security was always quietly worth, and what it will cost to keep once the free coins stop coming. The miners are not abandoning a sinking ship. They are selling the deck to a higher bidder while the same clock everyone forgot about keeps ticking underneath.

The biggest Bitcoin miners on earth are quietly walking away from mining Bitcoin, and the reason is not the one everyone keeps repeating. They are not fleeing a dead business. They lost an auction for their own power, and the winner was artificial intelligence. Start with the brutal arithmetic. It now costs the average public miner around $80,000 in cash to produce a single Bitcoin, and for stretches of this year $BTC traded below that. The most efficient operators on the cheapest power still clear a margin, but an estimated 15 to 20 percent of the global fleet is mining at a loss right now, burning more in power than the coins are worth the second they are minted. Three straight downward difficulty adjustments earlier this year, the first such streak since 2022, were the footprint of machines going dark. That looks like a simple story of a broken business until you see the number that explains the exodus. The same megawatt of power that earns a Bitcoin miner roughly $1 million a year earns between $10 and $20 million a year hosting AI compute. Ten to twenty times more, for the identical electricity, substation, and cooling. What made industrial miners valuable was never the mining. It was the power contracts, the land, the grid interconnects. AI walked in and bid an order of magnitude higher for exactly those assets. Mining did not fail. It got outbid for its own infrastructure. When Core Scientific runs its BTC segment at a negative margin while its AI colocation business prints money, the decision writes itself. CoinShares estimates listed miners could pull up to 70 percent of their revenue from AI by year end, up from about 30 percent. The power is being repriced to its highest use, and Bitcoin lost the bidding. If the giants leave, what happens to the network they secured? The doom posts assume it weakens. It does not, because Bitcoin has a self-healing reflex written into its core. When miners switch off, blocks slow, and within two weeks difficulty automatically drops, which makes mining cheaper and more profitable for everyone still running. The security does not vanish, it relocates, and you can already see where. State-backed pools are appearing, with one Gulf operator reportedly standing up a national pool near 3 percent of global hashrate, alongside private fleets and the handful of public miners like Marathon still choosing to buy Bitcoin rather than lease their power away. The network even hit an all-time high above one zettahash this year as the pivot accelerated. It does not need any particular miner. It needs someone, somewhere, for whom the math still works, and cheap stranded power has no shortage of those. But there is a deeper timer here, and the AI pivot just exposed it. Today miners earn almost everything from the block subsidy and almost nothing from fees, often under one percent of revenue on a quiet day. That subsidy halves again in 2028, and every four years after, marching toward zero. For Bitcoin to pay for its own security forever, fees eventually have to replace it. The open question is whether they can, and the evidence cuts both ways. On busy days, during token launches and inscription waves, fees have already spiked past 15 percent of revenue, and in 2024 some blocks earned more in fees than the entire subsidy. The capacity is there in bursts. Whether bursts become a baseline is the single most important unanswered question in Bitcoin. The AI exodus did not create that question. It pulled the cover off it years early, and showed how fast capital abandons hashing the moment something pays more. So the honest read is not that AI kills Bitcoin mining. It is stranger than that. AI is the first bidder rich enough to reveal what Bitcoin's security was always quietly worth, and what it will cost to keep once the free coins stop coming. The miners are not abandoning a sinking ship. They are selling the deck to a higher bidder while the same clock everyone forgot about keeps ticking underneath.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

90,812 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад