Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

[📍SAVE THIS] Don’t know who needs this, but here’s 𝗮 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽 𝗱𝗲𝗲𝗽-𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝘆𝗮𝗽 𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗼𝗳𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 without sounding like a marketer 😅: PROMPT # The Universal "Chaotic Storytime" Soft-Sell Blueprint Write a massive, unstructured, high-energy 'yap' session from a casual, relatable consumer perspective....

SarahLevinger's profile picture

Sarah 🦕

33,206 subscribers

13,761 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke: It’s impossible to make great products if you don’t give a sh*t “Every product in the world, at the end of the day, is simply a reflection of how much the people who created it gave a sh*t… It is not possible to make great products if the people who work on it do not give a sh*t about the product.” Tobi continues: “I actually think this is a very important role for product leaders: To make sure that the team gives a sh*it… The product leader has to give a sh*t. Do not engage in work on a product that you don’t care about.” Tobi believes anyone who wants to build great products has two roles: 1. “You have to understand the thing that’s being done better than everyone else.” 2. “You’ve got to be exothermically infectious with actually caring about this thing because just that one thing alone will make a 10x better product. It’s crazy how much of a change this makes.” Video source: Lenny Rachitsky (2025)
1:33

Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke: It’s impossible to make great products if you don’t give a sh*t “Every product in the world, at the end of the day, is simply a reflection of how much the people who created it gave a sh*t… It is not possible to make great products if the people who work on it do not give a sh*t about the product.” Tobi continues: “I actually think this is a very important role for product leaders: To make sure that the team gives a sh*it… The product leader has to give a sh*t. Do not engage in work on a product that you don’t care about.” Tobi believes anyone who wants to build great products has two roles: 1. “You have to understand the thing that’s being done better than everyone else.” 2. “You’ve got to be exothermically infectious with actually caring about this thing because just that one thing alone will make a 10x better product. It’s crazy how much of a change this makes.” Video source: Lenny Rachitsky (2025)

Startup Archive

185,096 просмотров • 1 год назад

Brian Tracy on his million-dollar sales lesson: "People don't care what your product is. They don't care about you. They don't care about your company. They don't even care what the product is." What do they care about? "The only thing people care about is what this product or service does for them." Brian explains that what customers really want is a change, an improvement, or a result in their life. "15% of buying behavior is determined by the past. 85% of buying behavior is determined by the anticipated future. What is going to happen as a result of me buying?" He illustrates this with a powerful analogy: "If you are selling a tour to the Canary Islands, spend 90% of your time talking about the destination and only 10% talking about the plane that you fly to the Canary Islands in." The problem? Most salespeople do the opposite. "Customers only buy improvement. The reason they buy is that they feel that the quality and quantity of the improvement will be greater than the cost and the trouble of using it." Sell the life they want, not the thing you made.
2:04

Brian Tracy on his million-dollar sales lesson: "People don't care what your product is. They don't care about you. They don't care about your company. They don't even care what the product is." What do they care about? "The only thing people care about is what this product or service does for them." Brian explains that what customers really want is a change, an improvement, or a result in their life. "15% of buying behavior is determined by the past. 85% of buying behavior is determined by the anticipated future. What is going to happen as a result of me buying?" He illustrates this with a powerful analogy: "If you are selling a tour to the Canary Islands, spend 90% of your time talking about the destination and only 10% talking about the plane that you fly to the Canary Islands in." The problem? Most salespeople do the opposite. "Customers only buy improvement. The reason they buy is that they feel that the quality and quantity of the improvement will be greater than the cost and the trouble of using it." Sell the life they want, not the thing you made.

Big Brain Business

124,260 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Martin Casado says Cursor's founders spend 30-40% of their time on hiring and culture, and that focus is how they iterate so fast: "A lot of these AI companies that I work with are so research-heavy. If you're not working on a new model architecture, it's kind of hard to actually interest the core teams." "They always kept the main thing the main thing, which is changing how you write software. They believed fundamentally it was a product problem... The model's very, very important, but it was a product problem." "There's actually not a lot of companies that are actually focused on product... There's a lot of research companies... But they were like, 'We are a product company.' And I think that's actually a key differentiator in this era." martin_casado w/ sophia dew and Theo Jaffee on MTS
1:25

Martin Casado says Cursor's founders spend 30-40% of their time on hiring and culture, and that focus is how they iterate so fast: "A lot of these AI companies that I work with are so research-heavy. If you're not working on a new model architecture, it's kind of hard to actually interest the core teams." "They always kept the main thing the main thing, which is changing how you write software. They believed fundamentally it was a product problem... The model's very, very important, but it was a product problem." "There's actually not a lot of companies that are actually focused on product... There's a lot of research companies... But they were like, 'We are a product company.' And I think that's actually a key differentiator in this era." martin_casado w/ sophia dew and Theo Jaffee on MTS

a16z

81,257 просмотров • 24 дней назад

IMPORTANT 🚨 American Voters, Democrats are planning on force medicating you through your food. this is not a conspiracy theory, this is 100% real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this.” The bill would have mandated labeling of the gene therapy vaccines in our food (explained below) THE BILL DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. — There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled AGAIN, THE BILL DID NOT PASS. IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration
2:27

IMPORTANT 🚨 American Voters, Democrats are planning on force medicating you through your food. this is not a conspiracy theory, this is 100% real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this.” The bill would have mandated labeling of the gene therapy vaccines in our food (explained below) THE BILL DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. — There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled AGAIN, THE BILL DID NOT PASS. IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration

Wall Street Apes

473,455 просмотров • 1 год назад

This guy got Claude to take control of Arcads and generate hyperrealistic UGC ads with a consistent AI actor, from a 7-word prompt, and now e-com brands pay him $1,500 per video to clone the setup. He got tired of watching DTC brands burn $4K on a photoshoot that dies the second a product angle changes, so he built a 2-prompt workflow that turns one product photo into scroll-stopping UGC without a single model, camera, or casting call. Here's the exact breakdown: → Claude is the director, Arcads is the studio. You never write a real prompt, you write one sentence → Type 7 words: "create a character sheet of a UGC actress on Arcads." Claude expands it into a 40-line spec: warm skin tone, high ponytail, gold hoops, white AirPods, athletic build, then takes control of Arcads itself → Arcads renders a 6-angle character sheet: front, back, profile, 3/4, two portraits, one consistent face locked across all of them → You download the grid and drop it back into Claude with one product photo → Second prompt, 8 words: "use Seedance 2.0 on Arcads to create natural UGC" → Claude writes the full shot list: timecodes, "1:03 AM clock zoom," the trackpad scroll, the arm pull that drags the product into frame, "delivery: casual, energetic," "ends on a wink + air kiss" → Arcads cuts the yellow Vans print onto an actor who was wearing all black in the grid. Real fabric folds, real light, zero warping → Final render: lip-sync locked to consonants, head not glued to the camera, a girl filming at 1am on her bed The key move 96% of people skip: you can't put the product on the actor before you lock the character sheet. If you drop a product photo onto a face that isn't locked across angles, the identity drifts frame to frame. The jaw resets. The skin tone shifts. The print slides off the fabric. The whole thing screams "AI" and your CTR dies in the first 2 seconds. His system locks the 6-view sheet first, so Arcads has one real human to dress, and the top lands with natural folds even though the grid never had it. One apparel brand ran 20 variants off a single product photo and found a winner in 36 hours, because the clips read like organic UGC, not a studio ad. Brands now pay him $1,500 per avatar build + $340/month to keep dropping fresh video batches on every new product. The entire thing runs on two prompts and one laptop. No photographer. No model agency. No product samples on set. Just two sentences, one product photo, and the discipline to lock the character before you render a single second of movement.
1:05

This guy got Claude to take control of Arcads and generate hyperrealistic UGC ads with a consistent AI actor, from a 7-word prompt, and now e-com brands pay him $1,500 per video to clone the setup. He got tired of watching DTC brands burn $4K on a photoshoot that dies the second a product angle changes, so he built a 2-prompt workflow that turns one product photo into scroll-stopping UGC without a single model, camera, or casting call. Here's the exact breakdown: → Claude is the director, Arcads is the studio. You never write a real prompt, you write one sentence → Type 7 words: "create a character sheet of a UGC actress on Arcads." Claude expands it into a 40-line spec: warm skin tone, high ponytail, gold hoops, white AirPods, athletic build, then takes control of Arcads itself → Arcads renders a 6-angle character sheet: front, back, profile, 3/4, two portraits, one consistent face locked across all of them → You download the grid and drop it back into Claude with one product photo → Second prompt, 8 words: "use Seedance 2.0 on Arcads to create natural UGC" → Claude writes the full shot list: timecodes, "1:03 AM clock zoom," the trackpad scroll, the arm pull that drags the product into frame, "delivery: casual, energetic," "ends on a wink + air kiss" → Arcads cuts the yellow Vans print onto an actor who was wearing all black in the grid. Real fabric folds, real light, zero warping → Final render: lip-sync locked to consonants, head not glued to the camera, a girl filming at 1am on her bed The key move 96% of people skip: you can't put the product on the actor before you lock the character sheet. If you drop a product photo onto a face that isn't locked across angles, the identity drifts frame to frame. The jaw resets. The skin tone shifts. The print slides off the fabric. The whole thing screams "AI" and your CTR dies in the first 2 seconds. His system locks the 6-view sheet first, so Arcads has one real human to dress, and the top lands with natural folds even though the grid never had it. One apparel brand ran 20 variants off a single product photo and found a winner in 36 hours, because the clips read like organic UGC, not a studio ad. Brands now pay him $1,500 per avatar build + $340/month to keep dropping fresh video batches on every new product. The entire thing runs on two prompts and one laptop. No photographer. No model agency. No product samples on set. Just two sentences, one product photo, and the discipline to lock the character before you render a single second of movement.

Shade

15,227 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

When shopping on Amazon, Flipkart, etc., most people focus on product ratings and reviews, but miss the most important thing: seller. And that’s where most bad purchases begin. The seller determines whether you get a genuine product or a cheap counterfeit, a new item or a refurbished one, and whether returns or warranty will be smooth or a nightmare. A highly rated product can still go wrong if the seller is unreliable. So before you order, check the seller name under the product title. A quick look at the seller’s ratings and recent reviews can save you from regret. Especially for high-value items, prefer the official brand store, the platform-verified seller, or a well-rated seller with consistent positive feedback. Also, for high-value orders, always record a clear video while opening the package, like this Bengaluru engineer who recorded unboxing a ₹1.86 lakh phone order that turned out to be a tile. It helps if you need to file a return or complaint.
1:38

When shopping on Amazon, Flipkart, etc., most people focus on product ratings and reviews, but miss the most important thing: seller. And that’s where most bad purchases begin. The seller determines whether you get a genuine product or a cheap counterfeit, a new item or a refurbished one, and whether returns or warranty will be smooth or a nightmare. A highly rated product can still go wrong if the seller is unreliable. So before you order, check the seller name under the product title. A quick look at the seller’s ratings and recent reviews can save you from regret. Especially for high-value items, prefer the official brand store, the platform-verified seller, or a well-rated seller with consistent positive feedback. Also, for high-value orders, always record a clear video while opening the package, like this Bengaluru engineer who recorded unboxing a ₹1.86 lakh phone order that turned out to be a tile. It helps if you need to file a return or complaint.

THE SKIN DOCTOR

218,741 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

This type of ad has been crushing it lately. And I'm talking about the "Brand story" type of ad. Let's analyze how it works. These ads follow a simple 3-part structure: - Hook - Body - New thing 1. The Hook The first thing these ads have is a strong first line that gets attention and generates curiosity. The only goal: to stop the scroll. It usually starts with something unexpected: a problem, a confession, a struggle, or a strong curiosity gap. 2. The Body Then we have the body, which is what all these videos have in common and why all these videos perform really well: The idea here is to share the story of the brand, the mission, and how and why they started. Show the progress they have been making. This creates a feeling of effort and like the journey of a hero. You know, when, like in movies, the hero has a mission to achieve or save something/someone, and you really connect with that idea and you cheer for him, well, it's the same here. 3. The End After building emotional investment, the creator finally introduces the “new thing”: a new feature, a new drop, a new product, a new update. The reveal hits harder because the story has already earned the viewer’s attention and trust. Instead of “Here’s our product,” it becomes: “Here’s what our journey led to.” And psychologically, that’s much more powerful. That's all for today! This was day 18/60 of analyzing a brand per day. Thanks for reading, if you have any questions, leave them below. If you want my team and me to help you create content, we are a DM away from making it happen. If you liked this thread, you will probably like the linked one below:
0:36

This type of ad has been crushing it lately. And I'm talking about the "Brand story" type of ad. Let's analyze how it works. These ads follow a simple 3-part structure: - Hook - Body - New thing 1. The Hook The first thing these ads have is a strong first line that gets attention and generates curiosity. The only goal: to stop the scroll. It usually starts with something unexpected: a problem, a confession, a struggle, or a strong curiosity gap. 2. The Body Then we have the body, which is what all these videos have in common and why all these videos perform really well: The idea here is to share the story of the brand, the mission, and how and why they started. Show the progress they have been making. This creates a feeling of effort and like the journey of a hero. You know, when, like in movies, the hero has a mission to achieve or save something/someone, and you really connect with that idea and you cheer for him, well, it's the same here. 3. The End After building emotional investment, the creator finally introduces the “new thing”: a new feature, a new drop, a new product, a new update. The reveal hits harder because the story has already earned the viewer’s attention and trust. Instead of “Here’s our product,” it becomes: “Here’s what our journey led to.” And psychologically, that’s much more powerful. That's all for today! This was day 18/60 of analyzing a brand per day. Thanks for reading, if you have any questions, leave them below. If you want my team and me to help you create content, we are a DM away from making it happen. If you liked this thread, you will probably like the linked one below:

axe

11,283 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

This is perhaps the best Raksha Bandhan ad I have seen this year, though, to be honest, it wouldn't qualify as an ad at all - more of a short film. It is adequately predictable, feels like something plucked out of a longer movie, but still managed to make me sit through it because it did the basics really well. For starters, unlike most raksha bandhan ads, the brother doesn't simply bring a solitary rakhi and get it tied. He actually brings the paraphernalia, including the diya... lights the diya, and the rakhi becomes a part of the larger effort, and not the only one (yes, it is the most visible part). The act reminded me of this 2025 Diwali ad, by the way: And his response to 'money' is where I thought the ad's writer did give it some thought. It was a charming response, fully in context of the situation, with a good sense of humor. And the camera panning to the constable was a nice touch too! Why a short film, and not an ad? Because the brand connect is literally zero. Swap any brand in the ad and it would equally... not fit :) The agency doesn't make any attempt to integrate anything about the product inside the narrative. To be fair, they cannot - it's that kind of a product 🤷‍♂️ At least if it was a brand of washing detergent, or cooking oil, or plywood... or something, they may have considered adding something about the product inside the narrative... and still, it would look weak/forced. It feels like the story was conceived as a standalone idea removed from any advertising context, and just shot because someone could bankroll this from the/a brand. #advertising #marketing #creativity
3:00

This is perhaps the best Raksha Bandhan ad I have seen this year, though, to be honest, it wouldn't qualify as an ad at all - more of a short film. It is adequately predictable, feels like something plucked out of a longer movie, but still managed to make me sit through it because it did the basics really well. For starters, unlike most raksha bandhan ads, the brother doesn't simply bring a solitary rakhi and get it tied. He actually brings the paraphernalia, including the diya... lights the diya, and the rakhi becomes a part of the larger effort, and not the only one (yes, it is the most visible part). The act reminded me of this 2025 Diwali ad, by the way: And his response to 'money' is where I thought the ad's writer did give it some thought. It was a charming response, fully in context of the situation, with a good sense of humor. And the camera panning to the constable was a nice touch too! Why a short film, and not an ad? Because the brand connect is literally zero. Swap any brand in the ad and it would equally... not fit :) The agency doesn't make any attempt to integrate anything about the product inside the narrative. To be fair, they cannot - it's that kind of a product 🤷‍♂️ At least if it was a brand of washing detergent, or cooking oil, or plywood... or something, they may have considered adding something about the product inside the narrative... and still, it would look weak/forced. It feels like the story was conceived as a standalone idea removed from any advertising context, and just shot because someone could bankroll this from the/a brand. #advertising #marketing #creativity

Karthik 🇮🇳

34,516 просмотров • 20 дней назад

🚨 They Are Planning On Force Medicating You Through Your Food. This Is Not A Conspiracy Theory, This Is 100% Real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this. Guys, this is cause and diet suddenly and by the way we know now i've got a paper talking about using milk ingestible we've got ingestible one of the things that everybody said well you know it'll break down in the stomach it won't matter that's not true i've got the science i've got the papers i've got the documents they have developed mechanisms to get this through the digestive system we don't know what it works on entirely we don't know how we don't have all information but what i can say absolute certainty There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. So there you have it. I mean this is not conspiracy theory, y'all. We have to get up. We have to wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up. Ha ha ha. Alright, so you guys, make sure you share this video. Make sure you're contacting your congressman. If you live in another state and this is, make sure you send the bill that we have to your congressman and let them know, you guys, we have to get involved with these politics. We have to, we just have to, right? Because they're weaponizing the politics and we're just saying don't be involved in politics and don't talk about the politics. And that is really gonna put us in the trick bag. And I don't think you're gonna like where that ends up. in total, 100% tyranny, okay? And parents, please start parenting your children. Moms, please get back home with the kids. Everyone start trying to live off of one income, right? That's the only way we're gonna win, is if we take our families back, okay? Make sure if you guys are new around here, you hit that thumbs up, right? —Leave a comment down below if you even had any idea about any of this stuff, right? Comment down below” There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled The Bill DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED
2:27

🚨 They Are Planning On Force Medicating You Through Your Food. This Is Not A Conspiracy Theory, This Is 100% Real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this. Guys, this is cause and diet suddenly and by the way we know now i've got a paper talking about using milk ingestible we've got ingestible one of the things that everybody said well you know it'll break down in the stomach it won't matter that's not true i've got the science i've got the papers i've got the documents they have developed mechanisms to get this through the digestive system we don't know what it works on entirely we don't know how we don't have all information but what i can say absolute certainty There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. So there you have it. I mean this is not conspiracy theory, y'all. We have to get up. We have to wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up. Ha ha ha. Alright, so you guys, make sure you share this video. Make sure you're contacting your congressman. If you live in another state and this is, make sure you send the bill that we have to your congressman and let them know, you guys, we have to get involved with these politics. We have to, we just have to, right? Because they're weaponizing the politics and we're just saying don't be involved in politics and don't talk about the politics. And that is really gonna put us in the trick bag. And I don't think you're gonna like where that ends up. in total, 100% tyranny, okay? And parents, please start parenting your children. Moms, please get back home with the kids. Everyone start trying to live off of one income, right? That's the only way we're gonna win, is if we take our families back, okay? Make sure if you guys are new around here, you hit that thumbs up, right? —Leave a comment down below if you even had any idea about any of this stuff, right? Comment down below” There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled The Bill DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED

Wall Street Apes

561,116 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This is probably one of the easiest way to sell on Meta ads. Not because it sells the product, but because it never really tries to. Watch it and you will see what I mean. I am a hardcore direct-response marketer. I believe you show the product, show the demo, make people feel the thing. This ad does something different, and it still works on me. It opens with an old man in a turban (the visual does 70% of the selling). He looks like he has lived a hard life and is still standing strong. He has not said a word yet and you already trust him. That is the whole trick. The elder look earns respect before the pitch even starts, so you stop scrolling and drop your guard. Then the first line lands. In my village, women are still farming on their feet at 80. No joint pain, no pills. He is not selling a supplement. He is selling ancient wisdom. And the moment he says his grandparents never needed pills, the promise stops feeling like a sales claim and starts feeling like proven tradition. Tradition is harder to argue with than a product. That is the real lesson here. He made me feel the trust before he made a single claim. By the time the product shows up, I am already leaning in. If your ad can earn trust and make people feel something before you ask for anything, you have done the hard part. Next time you build a creative, do not open with the product. Open with the person and the feeling. Let people trust you before you sell them. Follow for more ad breakdowns and ideas like these.
4:38

This is probably one of the easiest way to sell on Meta ads. Not because it sells the product, but because it never really tries to. Watch it and you will see what I mean. I am a hardcore direct-response marketer. I believe you show the product, show the demo, make people feel the thing. This ad does something different, and it still works on me. It opens with an old man in a turban (the visual does 70% of the selling). He looks like he has lived a hard life and is still standing strong. He has not said a word yet and you already trust him. That is the whole trick. The elder look earns respect before the pitch even starts, so you stop scrolling and drop your guard. Then the first line lands. In my village, women are still farming on their feet at 80. No joint pain, no pills. He is not selling a supplement. He is selling ancient wisdom. And the moment he says his grandparents never needed pills, the promise stops feeling like a sales claim and starts feeling like proven tradition. Tradition is harder to argue with than a product. That is the real lesson here. He made me feel the trust before he made a single claim. By the time the product shows up, I am already leaning in. If your ad can earn trust and make people feel something before you ask for anything, you have done the hard part. Next time you build a creative, do not open with the product. Open with the person and the feeling. Let people trust you before you sell them. Follow for more ad breakdowns and ideas like these.

Aazar Shad

11,262 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

If you're an Amazon India customer, take 2 mins to read this if your money is dear to you. TLDR version, Amazon delivery partners are literally scamming customers. And Amazon India will do nothing to help you in this situation. Kiss your money goodbye! I raised this concern on social media a few days back, for a product (Levi's jeans) which was marked as delivered but I never received it. Their customer support team, did some investigation and came to the conclusion that the product was indeed delivered. Hence, they cannot do anything more to assist me in this situation (refer image) This was not a OTP based delivery, and neither does Amazon mention the name of the person who received the product on their app/website. If it was OTP based delivery, I would know someone has given the OTP so delivery has happened. With a name, at least I would know if there's any person with that name in the house. Now, I have absolutely no way to confirm if Amazon genuinely delivered the product. Except video camera evidence. So I went to see the CCTV footage of the day and time the product was marked as delivered. In the CCTV footage, I see something very strange. The Amazon delivery partner arrives at my place, gets off the bike, takes out the product and for the next couple of mins just keeps doing something on his phone. He doesn't call me, or at least I don't have any call record of calls at that time. In the meanwhile, another person walking out closes the door. That person is not me, neither works for me and neither known to me. Likely associated with a neighbour/tenant and I have no such instructions for my Amazon account for deliveries to be left with anyone else. One minute later the Amazon delivery partner decides to leave (see screenshot). The delivery partner doesn't even enter the house and just leaves after a couple of mins. Without even entering the house, Amazon successfully delivered the product! Wow! And if the delivery partner handed the product to any random person walking out of the house, is that the customer's problem? Was this a very expensive product? No, not at all. So why am I spending all this time to write this? 1. I just want to spread awareness to everyone out there who might be getting scammed by such malpractices from Amazon / delivery partners. 2. If Amazon claims a product is delivered, you can't do nothing about it. Irrespective of whether the product was actually delivered or not. Your money is gone, poof! 3. It should be the company's responsibility to prove that a product was successfully delivered but in India it seems anyone can walk over their customers. 4. I'm shocked that a customer has to go to these lengths to uncover such scams in India 5. If ordering on Amazon, I will always select cash on delivery as the default going forward Amazon India - Do not contact me in hope that I will delete this tweet or evidence now! PS: Video doesn't have the date/time stamp as aspect ratio has been cropped. Will only share that with company officials if someone from Amazon wants to see it. Or with consumer courts if I decide to pursue this further, definitely not worth my time for now. But in the US, I would have definitely filed a lawsuit for millions.
3:05

If you're an Amazon India customer, take 2 mins to read this if your money is dear to you. TLDR version, Amazon delivery partners are literally scamming customers. And Amazon India will do nothing to help you in this situation. Kiss your money goodbye! I raised this concern on social media a few days back, for a product (Levi's jeans) which was marked as delivered but I never received it. Their customer support team, did some investigation and came to the conclusion that the product was indeed delivered. Hence, they cannot do anything more to assist me in this situation (refer image) This was not a OTP based delivery, and neither does Amazon mention the name of the person who received the product on their app/website. If it was OTP based delivery, I would know someone has given the OTP so delivery has happened. With a name, at least I would know if there's any person with that name in the house. Now, I have absolutely no way to confirm if Amazon genuinely delivered the product. Except video camera evidence. So I went to see the CCTV footage of the day and time the product was marked as delivered. In the CCTV footage, I see something very strange. The Amazon delivery partner arrives at my place, gets off the bike, takes out the product and for the next couple of mins just keeps doing something on his phone. He doesn't call me, or at least I don't have any call record of calls at that time. In the meanwhile, another person walking out closes the door. That person is not me, neither works for me and neither known to me. Likely associated with a neighbour/tenant and I have no such instructions for my Amazon account for deliveries to be left with anyone else. One minute later the Amazon delivery partner decides to leave (see screenshot). The delivery partner doesn't even enter the house and just leaves after a couple of mins. Without even entering the house, Amazon successfully delivered the product! Wow! And if the delivery partner handed the product to any random person walking out of the house, is that the customer's problem? Was this a very expensive product? No, not at all. So why am I spending all this time to write this? 1. I just want to spread awareness to everyone out there who might be getting scammed by such malpractices from Amazon / delivery partners. 2. If Amazon claims a product is delivered, you can't do nothing about it. Irrespective of whether the product was actually delivered or not. Your money is gone, poof! 3. It should be the company's responsibility to prove that a product was successfully delivered but in India it seems anyone can walk over their customers. 4. I'm shocked that a customer has to go to these lengths to uncover such scams in India 5. If ordering on Amazon, I will always select cash on delivery as the default going forward Amazon India - Do not contact me in hope that I will delete this tweet or evidence now! PS: Video doesn't have the date/time stamp as aspect ratio has been cropped. Will only share that with company officials if someone from Amazon wants to see it. Or with consumer courts if I decide to pursue this further, definitely not worth my time for now. But in the US, I would have definitely filed a lawsuit for millions.

Gurjot Ahluwalia

12,472 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

On the left is the top performing ad in the ad account. On the right is the viral organic post it was based on. Recreating organic content in your niche is one of the most effective ways to find winning ads. Here’s how we do it: 1. Search TikTok and Shorts for content around the problem/desired transformation (e.g. ”how to grow glutes”) 2. Save down top performing content to Foreplay 3. Take the transcription from Foreplay and input it to ChatGPT with the prompt below 4. Tweak the script and send it over to the creator Prompt (full script): "Now knowing what you know about my brand, rewrite this script for BRAND but instead, position the PRODUCT as the solution." Prompt (talking points): "Now knowing what you know about my brand, take this same structure and give me talking points to recreate it - but instead for a version where PRODUCT is positioned as the solution."
1:18

On the left is the top performing ad in the ad account. On the right is the viral organic post it was based on. Recreating organic content in your niche is one of the most effective ways to find winning ads. Here’s how we do it: 1. Search TikTok and Shorts for content around the problem/desired transformation (e.g. ”how to grow glutes”) 2. Save down top performing content to Foreplay 3. Take the transcription from Foreplay and input it to ChatGPT with the prompt below 4. Tweak the script and send it over to the creator Prompt (full script): "Now knowing what you know about my brand, rewrite this script for BRAND but instead, position the PRODUCT as the solution." Prompt (talking points): "Now knowing what you know about my brand, take this same structure and give me talking points to recreate it - but instead for a version where PRODUCT is positioned as the solution."

Alex Cooper

27,015 просмотров • 1 год назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT TURNS AN EMPTY FOLDER INTO A PRODUCT WITH A PRICE IN 60 MINUTES AND AIMS AT $100,000 A MONTH in one hour you get a product with a price on it - a startup burns a quarter and $80,000 for that same hour problem → shape → surface → price → machine → back to the problem you write only the first 12 minutes: who hurts, and what it costs them right now Opus 5 gives it a shape and then a price, three Sonnet 5 build three versions of the page Haiku 4.5 stands up the machine: delivery, the queue and the weekly numbers $100,000 a month is 1,000 customers at $100, or 10 at $10,000 same number, four completely different businesses which of those four rows you're standing on gets decided in minutes 36-48, not a year from now at minute sixty you have a product, a price and a machine - and 0 customers the hour compresses the first clock to nothing, it never touches the second one the hour makes the product, it does not make the demand save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 5 blocks ↓
2:00

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT TURNS AN EMPTY FOLDER INTO A PRODUCT WITH A PRICE IN 60 MINUTES AND AIMS AT $100,000 A MONTH in one hour you get a product with a price on it - a startup burns a quarter and $80,000 for that same hour problem → shape → surface → price → machine → back to the problem you write only the first 12 minutes: who hurts, and what it costs them right now Opus 5 gives it a shape and then a price, three Sonnet 5 build three versions of the page Haiku 4.5 stands up the machine: delivery, the queue and the weekly numbers $100,000 a month is 1,000 customers at $100, or 10 at $10,000 same number, four completely different businesses which of those four rows you're standing on gets decided in minutes 36-48, not a year from now at minute sixty you have a product, a price and a machine - and 0 customers the hour compresses the first clock to nothing, it never touches the second one the hour makes the product, it does not make the demand save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 5 blocks ↓

Noisy

14,084 просмотров • 6 дней назад

My AI made Shopify pages are getting better and better everyday Here’s an example of a Shopify section I built with the reference page and the result on my store 👇 Guide: To make good AI landing pages, you need to use the same method as making good AI UGC or AI product images you have to take something that's already good as a reference for Claude/gemini to analyze and adapt for your product/brand for now you can't adapt full landing pages to your product because the Claude context gets bloated fast and you get poor output. Listicles are the only kind of page you can "one shot" with Claude. But Product pages are another story Analyze an existing page and adapting it to your product section by section is the way to go. The results are 10x better. here's an example (on the video): 1- I found this good product section from im8's product page. I screen-recorded the section on both desktop and mobile, going through the animations to capture the dynamism that a screenshot wouldn’t show. Then I asked Claude Web or Gemini to analyze the recording and produce a very detailed report. Full prompt is on my TG channel, it's quite long. 2- then ask Claude (inside your Shopify brand project folder): "I have a detailed UI/UX specification document for a product page section I want to adapt to my product. Recreate this exactly on Shopify as a section template and adapt it to [name of the product] using the brand guidelines" (paste the result prompt from step 1 ). 3- you will have your section ready after 3-4 minutes. you'll probably have to change a few things. spacing, small visual bugs, price not appearing correctly. it will take you 5 minutes maximum. 4- then you can ask Claude to make 4 different variations of the section using different designs and pick the best one using this prompt: "Create 4 design variations of this section. Keep the content and layout structure identical across all, only vary the visual treatment (color usage, typography hierarchy, spacing, component styling). I will choose the one I like the most." after that you have a pretty good section, and you can do the process again for all sections of the page. The less complex the section, the faster the process will be. note: I know the AI result is not perfect, but it's pretty impressive imo and it will only get better.
0:27

My AI made Shopify pages are getting better and better everyday Here’s an example of a Shopify section I built with the reference page and the result on my store 👇 Guide: To make good AI landing pages, you need to use the same method as making good AI UGC or AI product images you have to take something that's already good as a reference for Claude/gemini to analyze and adapt for your product/brand for now you can't adapt full landing pages to your product because the Claude context gets bloated fast and you get poor output. Listicles are the only kind of page you can "one shot" with Claude. But Product pages are another story Analyze an existing page and adapting it to your product section by section is the way to go. The results are 10x better. here's an example (on the video): 1- I found this good product section from im8's product page. I screen-recorded the section on both desktop and mobile, going through the animations to capture the dynamism that a screenshot wouldn’t show. Then I asked Claude Web or Gemini to analyze the recording and produce a very detailed report. Full prompt is on my TG channel, it's quite long. 2- then ask Claude (inside your Shopify brand project folder): "I have a detailed UI/UX specification document for a product page section I want to adapt to my product. Recreate this exactly on Shopify as a section template and adapt it to [name of the product] using the brand guidelines" (paste the result prompt from step 1 ). 3- you will have your section ready after 3-4 minutes. you'll probably have to change a few things. spacing, small visual bugs, price not appearing correctly. it will take you 5 minutes maximum. 4- then you can ask Claude to make 4 different variations of the section using different designs and pick the best one using this prompt: "Create 4 design variations of this section. Keep the content and layout structure identical across all, only vary the visual treatment (color usage, typography hierarchy, spacing, component styling). I will choose the one I like the most." after that you have a pretty good section, and you can do the process again for all sections of the page. The less complex the section, the faster the process will be. note: I know the AI result is not perfect, but it's pretty impressive imo and it will only get better.

Olivier

84,679 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Rahul Vohra on how to measure product/market fit Rahul Vohra is the founder and CEO of Superhuman. He was looking for a metric to measure product/market fit so that he and his team could optimize, and he came across the following methodology from Sean Ellis: Simply ask your users: “How would you feel if you could no longer use the product?” with three options: (1) not disappointed, (2) somewhat disappointed, or (3) very disappointed. It turns out that the benchmark for product/market fit across hundreds of venture-backed startups is 40% of respondents saying “very disappointed”. And as Rahul puts it: “If more than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you should focus on growing your company. If less than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you’ll probably struggle to grow.” 40% may not sound like a lot, but it’s an incredibly hard benchmark to beat. For example, Slack posed this to 731 customers early in the company’s history, and 51% said they would be very disappointed without Slack. One might expect a terrific product like Slack to have a score of 60-80%, but that wasn’t the case. Rahul’s explanation of why the response options are focused on disappointment rather than happiness is interesting too: “I think the reason behind that is that if you ask people how they feel about a product and you give them positive potential responses, I think it invites more bias. People are more likely to be polite. And it also doesn’t get to the heart of the matter which is: how necessary has your product become in people’s lives? If you’re trying to build a company that’s going to stand the test of time, you really do have to build a product that matters and that people ultimately come to depend on because it’s just so incredible at what it does. And that’s what this question gets to the heart of.”
4:39

Rahul Vohra on how to measure product/market fit Rahul Vohra is the founder and CEO of Superhuman. He was looking for a metric to measure product/market fit so that he and his team could optimize, and he came across the following methodology from Sean Ellis: Simply ask your users: “How would you feel if you could no longer use the product?” with three options: (1) not disappointed, (2) somewhat disappointed, or (3) very disappointed. It turns out that the benchmark for product/market fit across hundreds of venture-backed startups is 40% of respondents saying “very disappointed”. And as Rahul puts it: “If more than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you should focus on growing your company. If less than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you’ll probably struggle to grow.” 40% may not sound like a lot, but it’s an incredibly hard benchmark to beat. For example, Slack posed this to 731 customers early in the company’s history, and 51% said they would be very disappointed without Slack. One might expect a terrific product like Slack to have a score of 60-80%, but that wasn’t the case. Rahul’s explanation of why the response options are focused on disappointment rather than happiness is interesting too: “I think the reason behind that is that if you ask people how they feel about a product and you give them positive potential responses, I think it invites more bias. People are more likely to be polite. And it also doesn’t get to the heart of the matter which is: how necessary has your product become in people’s lives? If you’re trying to build a company that’s going to stand the test of time, you really do have to build a product that matters and that people ultimately come to depend on because it’s just so incredible at what it does. And that’s what this question gets to the heart of.”

Michael McGuiness

67,106 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”
2:43

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,333 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I tested the Frido standing desk convertor against a cheap copy from amazon. Someone essentially sniped at claiming his product was overpriced. I hate this pattern. Most of these troll have nothing to judge the product on except a photo and the description written by some person using an LLM. The map is almost never the territory. So I asked Ganesh to order the "alternative" to my house and ordered the Frido product for myself. I will not say much except you should watch this review. the alternative costs 3k and the Frido product costs 8k. The alternative was basically unusable out of the box and it is flimsy enough that it will break in a few uses. Nothing like seeing so watch the review but I would recommend the Frido standing desk convertor. Note: I am not a product reviewer or any such thing. I just get triggered every now and then and do these random things. Ganesh did not pay me to do this and there is a good reason I declined Ganesh's offer to pay for the product. I will be using the Frido desk convertor myself and giving away for free the amazon listed crappy alternative to anyone who wants to suffer.
3:36

I tested the Frido standing desk convertor against a cheap copy from amazon. Someone essentially sniped at claiming his product was overpriced. I hate this pattern. Most of these troll have nothing to judge the product on except a photo and the description written by some person using an LLM. The map is almost never the territory. So I asked Ganesh to order the "alternative" to my house and ordered the Frido product for myself. I will not say much except you should watch this review. the alternative costs 3k and the Frido product costs 8k. The alternative was basically unusable out of the box and it is flimsy enough that it will break in a few uses. Nothing like seeing so watch the review but I would recommend the Frido standing desk convertor. Note: I am not a product reviewer or any such thing. I just get triggered every now and then and do these random things. Ganesh did not pay me to do this and there is a good reason I declined Ganesh's offer to pay for the product. I will be using the Frido desk convertor myself and giving away for free the amazon listed crappy alternative to anyone who wants to suffer.

kuldeep

191,405 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

“The theory of intelligent design holds that there are certain features of life in the universe that are best explained as a product of a creative intelligence.” “The digital code that’s stored in the DNA.” “Patterns in the fossil record.” “The presence of nanomachinery inside life.” Stephen C. Meyer just sat down with me to break down the theory of intelligent design: This theory holds that certain features of life appear to be the “product of a creative intelligence, rather than a strictly undirected physical or material process, such as, in the biological realm, natural selection acting on random mutations.” “All these things are things that we think are best explained because a creative intelligence has played a role in the origin and history of life.” “We have phenomena like the fine-tuning of the initial arrangement of matter and energy at the beginning of the universe and the fine-tuning of the laws and constants of physics.” “The basic parameters of physics fall within very narrow ranges or tolerances outside of which, not only life, but even basic chemistry, would be impossible.” Meyer’s new documentary, The Story of Everything, explored the evidence that humanity and our universe are not the product of random evolution, but that we were created by a designer. “We look at the evidence for the beginning of the universe, and with it, the very real possibility that we’re looking at evidence of a creation event.” “We also look at the discovery of fine-tuning.” “And we look at the interior of the cell and the discoveries of the miniature machinery and the digital code that makes the proteins that make the machines and make everything else inside living cells.” Stephen C. Meyer
2:07

“The theory of intelligent design holds that there are certain features of life in the universe that are best explained as a product of a creative intelligence.” “The digital code that’s stored in the DNA.” “Patterns in the fossil record.” “The presence of nanomachinery inside life.” Stephen C. Meyer just sat down with me to break down the theory of intelligent design: This theory holds that certain features of life appear to be the “product of a creative intelligence, rather than a strictly undirected physical or material process, such as, in the biological realm, natural selection acting on random mutations.” “All these things are things that we think are best explained because a creative intelligence has played a role in the origin and history of life.” “We have phenomena like the fine-tuning of the initial arrangement of matter and energy at the beginning of the universe and the fine-tuning of the laws and constants of physics.” “The basic parameters of physics fall within very narrow ranges or tolerances outside of which, not only life, but even basic chemistry, would be impossible.” Meyer’s new documentary, The Story of Everything, explored the evidence that humanity and our universe are not the product of random evolution, but that we were created by a designer. “We look at the evidence for the beginning of the universe, and with it, the very real possibility that we’re looking at evidence of a creation event.” “We also look at the discovery of fine-tuning.” “And we look at the interior of the cell and the discoveries of the miniature machinery and the digital code that makes the proteins that make the machines and make everything else inside living cells.” Stephen C. Meyer

Jan Jekielek

19,015 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

From the archive: Micky 🐸 reflecting on what two decades in global fintech taught him. “I was never the best student at school, but I was a student of life. Walking the streets and seeing how people behave with money was the best master class I could have gotten.” “At the end, everything you do is building a brand, and brand means trust. It’s underrated how long it takes to build trust and how quickly it can fracture.” “Every financial product is a commodity that can be copied; the only real moat is a trusted brand.”
1:26

From the archive: Micky 🐸 reflecting on what two decades in global fintech taught him. “I was never the best student at school, but I was a student of life. Walking the streets and seeing how people behave with money was the best master class I could have gotten.” “At the end, everything you do is building a brand, and brand means trust. It’s underrated how long it takes to build trust and how quickly it can fracture.” “Every financial product is a commodity that can be copied; the only real moat is a trusted brand.”

TBPN

19,938 просмотров • 1 год назад