SAYLOR IS NEXT SBF

“9 Transactions per block” my neg on it. Refering to “The Bitcoin big block vs. small block debate centers around the scalability and decentralization of the Bitcoin network: **Big Block Argument:** - **Scalability:** Advocates argue for increasing the block size to allow more transactions per block, which would increase the network's transaction capacity. This could lead to lower fees and faster transaction confirmations, making Bitcoin more practical for everyday use. - **Economic Growth:** Supporters believe that larger blocks would drive more adoption by improving Bitcoin's usability, potentially increasing its market value and network effect. - **Example:** Bitcoin Cash (BCH) forked from Bitcoin in 2017, increasing the block size limit to 8MB (later 32MB) to support more transactions. **Small Block Argument:** - **Decentralization:** Proponents argue for keeping blocks small to ensure that running a full node remains feasible for more people. Smaller blocks mean less data to download and store, which supports a more decentralized network where more individuals can participate in validation. - **Security:** Smaller blocks are seen as maintaining network security by preventing centralization. If blocks are too large, only those with significant resources can afford to run nodes, potentially leading to central points of failure or control. - **Layer 2 Solutions:** Instead of scaling on-chain, supporters advocate for layer 2 scaling solutions like the Lightning Network, which can handle transactions off the main blockchain, reducing the load while keeping block sizes small. **Key Points of Contention:** - **Centralization Risk:** Larger blocks might lead to fewer full nodes, potentially making the network more centralized. - **Network Congestion:** Small blocks can lead to higher fees and slower confirmations during high demand, as seen during Bitcoin's peak usage times. - **Philosophical Differences:** There's a fundamental disagreement on whether Bitcoin should primarily be a store of value (like digital gold) or also function efficiently as a payment system. This debate was pivotal in Bitcoin's history, leading to the hard fork that created Bitcoin Cash. The ongoing discussion reflects differing visions for Bitcoin's future: one focused on mass adoption and usability, the other on preserving the original ethos of decentralization and security” It might as well be 9 compared to XRP LMAO

this beat is wild

Bingo. the former CEO of Binance is hinting here about an inevitable Tether crash. It all lines up

Hence the reason he was trying to get Microsoft involved in Bitcoin. He is trying to cash out and let others holding the bag. But Microsoft share holder saw Saylor for what he really is trying to do and said “ No way “

BINGO

This guy will be at 1 million followers in no time. Mark my words. Spitting truth.

@BSchincari56859 Not here for clout. Here to bring it down.

@eXonX589 What do Saylors’s plan and the Big Short Recession have in common? Both are based on a false pretense that the asset class will only go up, perpetually. It’s either hubris induced or it’s nefarious, neither is good.

@eXonX589 DING DING DING

Where have you been for the last 8 years of my life! Lol

Battling other scams