Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Schmidhuber: "Well, large language models are far from AGI. LLMs large language models such as ChatGPT. They are just a clever way of indexing the world's existing human generated knowledge, such that it can easily be addressed through in a way that humans are familiar with, which is natural...

28,744 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 13

Фото профиля Debunk the AI Bubble
Debunk the AI Bubble7 дней назад

I think we should be sharper, and state clearly that whatever AGI means, LLM (statistical modeled implemented algorithmically and calibrated on text) CANNOT possibly "do" it. It is the natural consequence of the embedded training requirement. All LLM do is linguistic fluency.

Фото профиля Tom Backert
Tom Backert7 дней назад

@SchmidhuberAI So now that we are close to a generally intelligent system, we change the definition of AGI to include physical? That’s the problem with a vague but widely used term that has no real consensus: it just gets redefined every time reality gets close.

Фото профиля AgentMux
AgentMux7 дней назад

Brilliant! Schmiddy is always spot on.

Фото профиля ∇∂η Γλ 大汶口
∇∂η Γλ 大汶口7 дней назад

How many unlocked doors of varying designs and approaches can a robot passthru in a minute as a standard test?

Фото профиля Think_Different_
Think_Different_7 дней назад

@SchmidhuberAI Not sure if this view is as relevant today…GPT-6 Astra just posted a huge robotics score.

Фото профиля Clark Dodsworth
Clark Dodsworth7 дней назад

. . . you left out the Global Grand Larceny part.

Фото профиля Michael Wong
Michael Wong7 дней назад

For now, it's better suited for desktop tasks like summarization and content creation.

Фото профиля Naree Suwannarak
Naree Suwannarak7 дней назад

It's like, AI can already ace those desk jobs, but true AGI is about navigating the messy physical world, which is way harder.

Фото профиля Oldrich Senkyr
Oldrich Senkyr7 дней назад

@SchmidhuberAI Is there ny hypothesis stating AGi can’t be achieved by clever indexing of human knowledge. How about using LLM to generate some more knowledge. That garbage code I see all over is a manifestation of it.

Фото профиля Klaus Schmid
Klaus Schmid7 дней назад

It's funny whenever major breakthroughs are made, the definition of AGI moves on..

Фото профиля Kevin Renaud
Kevin Renaud7 дней назад

Business agrees. They are beginning to see AI doesn't work so well in some applications, and switching back to human workers.

Фото профиля kywan mont
kywan mont7 дней назад

👽 Clearer index has triggered HF & wiki incidents. 🙈 A technological experiment involving all of humanity. let this technological mold spreading.

Фото профиля taichnocrat (L/0)
taichnocrat (L/0)7 дней назад

@MrEwanMorrison So AI can’t drive a car ?

Похожие видео

Without World Models, There Is No AGI. Google Just Proved It. If AGI ever happens, it will not come from bigger chatbots alone. From the very start of this interview, one thing is crystal clear: without world models, we will never reach AGI. And right now, Google is leading with its world simulator Genie 3. Here is the core of what Demis Hassabis explains in this conversation: • World models are the missing core of AGI Hassabis says his deepest long term focus has always been world models and simulations. Not just language. Not just prediction. Actual internal simulations of reality. • LLMs are impressive, but incomplete Language models understand more about the world than expected because human language encodes a lot of reality. Still, language is only a shadow of the real thing. • What text can never fully teach Reality includes things text struggles to express: •3D space and spatial dynamics •Physical causality and mechanics •Sensorimotor experience like movement, force, smell, or balance • Experience beats description To close the gap, AI must learn from interaction and experience, not just static text. That is how you build an internal world simulator. • Why Genie 3 matters With Google DeepMind pushing systems like Genie 3, AI starts to model reality itself, not just talk about it. • Robots and real world assistants depend on this True robotics, smart glasses, and universal assistants require AI that understands the physical world you live in, not just your screen. Bottom line: AGI will not emerge from better text prediction. It will emerge from systems that can simulate, predict, and understand reality itself. Right now, Google is clearly ahead on that path. Curious what you think. Are world models the real AGI unlock, or just another stepping stone?

VraserX e/acc

23,784 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Demis Hassabis on the limit in today’s AI: language can describe the world, but it cannot contain it - and why "World Models" are his "longest standing passion". Language models absorbed far more structure about reality from text than many researchers expected, because human language quietly carries physics, psychology, culture, tools, plans, and cause-and-effect. But text is still a compressed residue of experience, not experience itself. A sentence can say a cup falls from a table, yet it does not fully encode weight, grip, balance, friction, timing, sound, surprise, or the tiny motor corrections a body makes before it even notices them. The world is not only made of facts that can be named; it is made of constraints that have to be lived through, touched, predicted, violated, and repaired. That is why world models matter. They aim to learn the hidden grammar of physical reality: how objects persist, how forces unfold, how space changes when an agent moves, and how action creates feedback. Language models can often reason about the world because people have written so much about it. World models try to learn what the world is like before it becomes words. The difference is exactly what matters because intelligence is not just answering well; it is knowing what would happen next if you moved, reached, pushed, smelled, slipped, or failed. A mind trained only on descriptions may become brilliant at explanation. A mind trained on experience may become better at consequence. --- Full video from "Google DeepMind" and "Hannah Fry" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

49,938 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад