Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Schrödinger’s feminist is both empowered and helpless until an argument requires her to become one or the other. Vying for power? Women are as rational, competent, and emotionally stable as men. Murdering three children? Women are victims of postpartum depression and cannot be held responsible. Equality of representation requires...

15,017 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

17 Comments

snacks☃️🎄✨❄️'s profile picture
snacks☃️🎄✨❄️1 month ago

This is my main annoyance with the new-age leftist postmodern thought. It's not that it's wrong or disingenuous to deconstruct and be critical of things, it's that it's ALWAYS done selectively/reverse-rationalized, to bolster one's own victimhood and demonize/dehumanize others.

Liam Out Loud's profile picture
Liam Out Loud1 month ago

Exactly. It's directional for a specific purpose.

Venatrix🐺💜's profile picture
Venatrix🐺💜29 days ago

Schrödinger’s feminist is such a perfect term

David Whitehead's profile picture
David Whitehead1 month ago

This massive and glaring logical fallacy is feminism’s final boss.

Jonas Cord 🇺🇸's profile picture
Jonas Cord 🇺🇸29 days ago

I’m really fucking tired of people saying we have to figure out why they committed this horrific crime. It makes no difference why they did it! The difference is how we take care of the trash when the time comes. It must be done quickly and permanently!

Bob's profile picture
Bob1 month ago

The real problem is the belief that women are inherently intelligent and capable of rational decisions

TruthSeeker2700's profile picture
TruthSeeker270029 days ago

Omg Schröders Feminist is the perfect definition

Tom's profile picture
Tom1 month ago

Excellent post, as always. However I would add that the people defending her, being mostly liberal, have their entire world view shredded if she is allowed to be treated as the oppressor/victimizer. Yes, women are supposedly as capable as men, but they are at the same time oppressed somehow. The liberal and woke movements are based on victimhood. In their view, women are always the victims. So when a woman does something so heinous, another scapegoat MUST be found. It's the opposite of accountability.

InsertNameHere's profile picture
InsertNameHere1 month ago

Brilliant post. 100% true....

Mark Schmidt's profile picture
Mark Schmidt29 days ago

What we are seeing now in the feminist psyche emerge is homicidal empathy.

StanTastic's profile picture
StanTastic29 days ago

This would have hit different if it was done by a woman 🤣

Pry Mincer's profile picture
Pry Mincer20 days ago

You may find the ideas in this video interesting -

Opinionated Woman 🇺🇸's profile picture
Opinionated Woman 🇺🇸29 days ago

Exactly! 👏🏻💕

Political incorrecter's profile picture
Political incorrecter29 days ago

Women shouldn’t vote

D. ü. R.'s profile picture
D. ü. R.29 days ago

Positively discriminating is still discrimination.

paisios's profile picture
paisios19 days ago

The Matriarchy Is Filicidal Feminism IS the Matriarchy

Grand Sourcery's profile picture
Grand Sourcery29 days ago

Should insanity, crime triggered by psychosis not be a defense strategy in any trial? Just asking

Related Videos

This is a compilation of videos circulating online of women raging or hurting their kids or staring blankly into space while holding their infants, claiming: "I'm so mentally unwell I can't even care for my child, and this is how common postpartum depression is. This is what childbirth does.” “Same, Lindsay.” #Lindsayclancy Many of these posts are tagged with #PPDawareness, pushing the narrative that women have always suffered like this in silence, and that this level of severe instability is just "how common suffering actually is." If this new "awareness" successfully convinces the world that motherhood is an inherently dangerous state that drives women to violent hair-trigger rage or total dysfunction, what does that mean for women? How do we keep children and society safe? Should every woman undergo mandatory psychiatric screening before becoming a mother? Should new mothers be barred from returning to work, or forbidden from serving as doctors, judges, or police officers if they take antidepressants? If women are painted as a demographic capable of snapping without warning and that this is widespread and previously hidden you are describing a group of people no society could safely trust with authority or responsibility. This isn't genuine advocacy, I doubt they care about Clancy or her kids, look how easily they harm their own. This is the aggressive protection of victimhood status. Many supporters of Lindsay Clancy are pushing so hard against the evidence because they are terrified of the alternative: a woman being held legally responsible rather than excused as a "victim of biology." The core premise of this radical ideology is that every woman is inherently capable of greatness, and if she fails or harms her child, she must be a helpless victim of her biology or society. Every woman is loving and if she isn’t- society is asking too much of her. Except this is what women are made to do. If your goal is to protect women's parental autonomy, you cannot take the normal stress and sacrifice we all experience as mothers and elevate it to postpartum rage, psychosis, and depression. Extreme postpartum conditions are just not as common as social media trends make them out to be, and sacrificing accountability to gain victimhood status for an imaginary collective identity - women- will do a lot of harm to your own cause and to everyone.

Hannah Spier, MD

37,821 views • 26 days ago