Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Schrödinger’s feminist is both empowered and helpless until an argument requires her to become one or the other. Vying for power? Women are as rational, competent, and emotionally stable as men. Murdering three children? Women are victims of postpartum depression and cannot be held responsible. Equality of representation requires...

15,017 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 17

Фото профиля snacks☃️🎄✨❄️
snacks☃️🎄✨❄️1 месяц назад

This is my main annoyance with the new-age leftist postmodern thought. It's not that it's wrong or disingenuous to deconstruct and be critical of things, it's that it's ALWAYS done selectively/reverse-rationalized, to bolster one's own victimhood and demonize/dehumanize others.

Фото профиля Liam Out Loud
Liam Out Loud1 месяц назад

Exactly. It's directional for a specific purpose.

Фото профиля Venatrix🐺💜
Venatrix🐺💜29 дней назад

Schrödinger’s feminist is such a perfect term

Фото профиля David Whitehead
David Whitehead1 месяц назад

This massive and glaring logical fallacy is feminism’s final boss.

Фото профиля Jonas Cord 🇺🇸
Jonas Cord 🇺🇸29 дней назад

I’m really fucking tired of people saying we have to figure out why they committed this horrific crime. It makes no difference why they did it! The difference is how we take care of the trash when the time comes. It must be done quickly and permanently!

Фото профиля Bob
Bob1 месяц назад

The real problem is the belief that women are inherently intelligent and capable of rational decisions

Фото профиля TruthSeeker2700
TruthSeeker270029 дней назад

Omg Schröders Feminist is the perfect definition

Фото профиля Tom
Tom29 дней назад

Excellent post, as always. However I would add that the people defending her, being mostly liberal, have their entire world view shredded if she is allowed to be treated as the oppressor/victimizer. Yes, women are supposedly as capable as men, but they are at the same time oppressed somehow. The liberal and woke movements are based on victimhood. In their view, women are always the victims. So when a woman does something so heinous, another scapegoat MUST be found. It's the opposite of accountability.

Фото профиля InsertNameHere
InsertNameHere29 дней назад

Brilliant post. 100% true....

Фото профиля Mark Schmidt
Mark Schmidt29 дней назад

What we are seeing now in the feminist psyche emerge is homicidal empathy.

Фото профиля StanTastic
StanTastic29 дней назад

This would have hit different if it was done by a woman 🤣

Фото профиля Pry Mincer
Pry Mincer20 дней назад

You may find the ideas in this video interesting -

Фото профиля Opinionated Woman 🇺🇸
Opinionated Woman 🇺🇸29 дней назад

Exactly! 👏🏻💕

Фото профиля Political incorrecter
Political incorrecter29 дней назад

Women shouldn’t vote

Фото профиля D. ü. R.
D. ü. R.29 дней назад

Positively discriminating is still discrimination.

Фото профиля paisios
paisios19 дней назад

The Matriarchy Is Filicidal Feminism IS the Matriarchy

Фото профиля Grand Sourcery
Grand Sourcery29 дней назад

Should insanity, crime triggered by psychosis not be a defense strategy in any trial? Just asking

Похожие видео

This is a compilation of videos circulating online of women raging or hurting their kids or staring blankly into space while holding their infants, claiming: "I'm so mentally unwell I can't even care for my child, and this is how common postpartum depression is. This is what childbirth does.” “Same, Lindsay.” #Lindsayclancy Many of these posts are tagged with #PPDawareness, pushing the narrative that women have always suffered like this in silence, and that this level of severe instability is just "how common suffering actually is." If this new "awareness" successfully convinces the world that motherhood is an inherently dangerous state that drives women to violent hair-trigger rage or total dysfunction, what does that mean for women? How do we keep children and society safe? Should every woman undergo mandatory psychiatric screening before becoming a mother? Should new mothers be barred from returning to work, or forbidden from serving as doctors, judges, or police officers if they take antidepressants? If women are painted as a demographic capable of snapping without warning and that this is widespread and previously hidden you are describing a group of people no society could safely trust with authority or responsibility. This isn't genuine advocacy, I doubt they care about Clancy or her kids, look how easily they harm their own. This is the aggressive protection of victimhood status. Many supporters of Lindsay Clancy are pushing so hard against the evidence because they are terrified of the alternative: a woman being held legally responsible rather than excused as a "victim of biology." The core premise of this radical ideology is that every woman is inherently capable of greatness, and if she fails or harms her child, she must be a helpless victim of her biology or society. Every woman is loving and if she isn’t- society is asking too much of her. Except this is what women are made to do. If your goal is to protect women's parental autonomy, you cannot take the normal stress and sacrifice we all experience as mothers and elevate it to postpartum rage, psychosis, and depression. Extreme postpartum conditions are just not as common as social media trends make them out to be, and sacrificing accountability to gain victimhood status for an imaginary collective identity - women- will do a lot of harm to your own cause and to everyone.

Hannah Spier, MD

37,821 просмотров • 26 дней назад