Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
“Science is a religion” debate. They don’t even realize it. Full at
117,395 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
32 Kommentare

Exactly, it's faith based. You need to have faith that the scientists (priests) are telling the truth, in order to believe it. Questioning or distrusting scientists in 2026 is equivalent to being a blasphemous heretic in 1000AD.

Truly the scary thing. That right there is a NPC, and they usually look like him, all pale and soft and feminine

Dude. Keep at it man. These folks are absolutely worshipping at the alter of bal. The best was when you said “Yea because they put a square box on their head to go into debt” 🤣🤣🤣 Their debt (slavery) makes them all knowing? It’s the classic Uncle Tom syndrome.

What’s your source that the moon landing is real? Them : NASA

I the past 9 months your streams have really opened my eyes. Its not that im (only) getting superior information from you, but rather that i have learned, that most of the time i AM actually able to spot these goal-post-moving types of arguments my self. Thank you Owen

Oh my God you sound like such a moron, do you actually think you did well here?! Here’s telling you something very simple ie you can calculate the rate of fall and you’re going on about “footage”. You’re too arrogant to see how wrong you are.

owned just fuking owned sooo hard it hurts... Owen is a true Top G!

Yup. Lot of science zealots

Can't wait to watch this whole thing today while I work!

You can look at the Enlightenment period for reference. This is when the elites took science and turned it into an epistemology in order to strip meaning from the cosmic universe. A realm without meaning → an easily manipulable population.

You are actually too stupid to do science. When responsibility for being wrong passes to you, you just make a dumb joke that people aren't tall enough to get.

The sentiment is similar I get what you are saying but written accounts of something completely nonsensical ( the resurrection ) and footage of something plausible and repeated under similar conditions would be a false equivalent.

Something you may have picked up on during the debate. You pointed out that the telemetry data was wiped from the moon missions. He then shouted back that this was only Apollo 11 data that was missing. But couldn't then answer why they didn't go back. Is the telemetry data all gone or not?

Lmao. It’s verifiable. You can look at the footage. Send this dude an ai video of his wife banging his brother and tell him it’s verifiable. Every movie and tv show must be real as well. Because, film doesn’t lie.

Science itself is not a religion. Science is observing, experimentation, and reporting. However, the modern “science” has become a religion. They fail to do those basic things because their own results frighten their fragile little minds. You have to be brave to be a scientist.

They want you to believe known liars, repeatedly.

It is good that you keep your composure he will think about this and may help him in the future.

“ Footage “ 😂😂

A purpose of mass education is to indoctrinate people into becoming 'science believers'. Whether it's moon landings or electron microscopy, good luck verifying those 'facts'!

debates are so gay

The Bible - Jewish stories that Owen bases his life around

Space science is a cult 🎱

You are too deep for that guy to understand💡

“go on”🤣

Imagine the debate is just you quoting pastors and claiming thats truth. Thats essentially what science bros are doing…..”THERES MIRRORS ON THE MOOOOOON!”

Full video link?

Owen has made art of dismantling the beliefs of retards.

It’s a bird! It’s a plane! No, it’s:

@kenthovind

Well done Owen

I thought the scientific community was supposed to have an open mind to different concepts rather than be so dogmatic about their beliefs

I mean your pretty contradictory and weak on actual points. Your basis is decent (as in the questions are good) but the inherently lack the fundamentals to produce a fruitful argument past 60 second stances and viewpoints.
