Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

⚠️ Scientists call this the MOST ACCURATE nuclear blast ever shown in cinema... Paired with a terrifying full-scale modern nuclear war simulation. T2 Judgment Day’s legendary scene meets apocalyptic nightmare fuel. Pure dread. 😱 Does the simulation feel even more terrifying than T2? Clip 1: Museum On The Go...

movies_only_x's profile picture

Movies Only 🍿

22,496 subscribers

12,991 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Here's my conversation with Annie Jacobsen (Annie Jacobsen) all about nuclear war, CIA, Area 51, UFOs, and government secrecy. This was a terrifying and fascinating conversation. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:13 - Nuclear war 6:57 - Launch procedure 12:36 - Deterrence 16:09 - Tactical nukes 25:35 - Nuclear submarines 28:35 - Nuclear missiles 35:46 - Nuclear football 44:53 - Missile interceptor system 49:10 - North Korea 55:46 - Nuclear war scenarios 1:04:38 - Warmongers 1:09:06 - President's cognitive ability 1:15:19 - Refusing orders 1:23:17 - Russia and Putin 1:28:23 - Cyberattack 1:29:45 - Ground zero of nuclear war 1:34:24 - Surviving nuclear war 1:38:42 - Nuclear winter 1:49:05 - Alien civilizations 1:54:40 - Extrasensory perception 2:08:25 - Area 51 2:12:23 - UFOs and aliens 2:22:51 - Roswell incident 2:29:30 - CIA assassinations 2:48:23 - Navalny 2:50:48 - KGB 2:57:24 - Hitler and the atomic bomb 3:01:27 - War and human nature 3:04:53 - Hope
3:07:18

Here's my conversation with Annie Jacobsen (Annie Jacobsen) all about nuclear war, CIA, Area 51, UFOs, and government secrecy. This was a terrifying and fascinating conversation. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:13 - Nuclear war 6:57 - Launch procedure 12:36 - Deterrence 16:09 - Tactical nukes 25:35 - Nuclear submarines 28:35 - Nuclear missiles 35:46 - Nuclear football 44:53 - Missile interceptor system 49:10 - North Korea 55:46 - Nuclear war scenarios 1:04:38 - Warmongers 1:09:06 - President's cognitive ability 1:15:19 - Refusing orders 1:23:17 - Russia and Putin 1:28:23 - Cyberattack 1:29:45 - Ground zero of nuclear war 1:34:24 - Surviving nuclear war 1:38:42 - Nuclear winter 1:49:05 - Alien civilizations 1:54:40 - Extrasensory perception 2:08:25 - Area 51 2:12:23 - UFOs and aliens 2:22:51 - Roswell incident 2:29:30 - CIA assassinations 2:48:23 - Navalny 2:50:48 - KGB 2:57:24 - Hitler and the atomic bomb 3:01:27 - War and human nature 3:04:53 - Hope

Lex Fridman

937,521 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Here's a 4-hour debate I hosted on the topic of Iran war, its nuclear program, and nuclear proliferation & geopolitics in general with Scott Horton (Scott Horton) and Mark Dubowitz (Mark Dubowitz). This was intense and fascinating! It's here on X in full and is up everywhere else (see comment). Timestamps: 0:00 - Episode highlight 1:15 - Introduction 2:18 - Iran-Israel War 11:00 - Iran's Nuclear Program 42:52 - Nuclear weapons and uranium 54:55 - Nuclear deal 1:20:29 - Iran Nuclear Archive 1:43:06 - Best case and worst case near-term future 2:18:30 - US attack on Iran - Operation Midnight Hammer 2:42:04 - Nuclear proliferation in the future 3:03:02 - Libertarianism 3:15:51 - Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) 3:31:26 - Trump and Peacemaking process 3:36:23 - WW2 3:49:23 - WW3
4:05:15

Here's a 4-hour debate I hosted on the topic of Iran war, its nuclear program, and nuclear proliferation & geopolitics in general with Scott Horton (Scott Horton) and Mark Dubowitz (Mark Dubowitz). This was intense and fascinating! It's here on X in full and is up everywhere else (see comment). Timestamps: 0:00 - Episode highlight 1:15 - Introduction 2:18 - Iran-Israel War 11:00 - Iran's Nuclear Program 42:52 - Nuclear weapons and uranium 54:55 - Nuclear deal 1:20:29 - Iran Nuclear Archive 1:43:06 - Best case and worst case near-term future 2:18:30 - US attack on Iran - Operation Midnight Hammer 2:42:04 - Nuclear proliferation in the future 3:03:02 - Libertarianism 3:15:51 - Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) 3:31:26 - Trump and Peacemaking process 3:36:23 - WW2 3:49:23 - WW3

Lex Fridman

873,879 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Here's my conversation with David Kirtley (), a nuclear fusion engineer, all about the physics and engineering of nuclear fission, fusion, and the future of energy. David is leading a team that's working to build the world's first commercial fusion power plant by 2028. This was a super technical conversation and a fascinating one, for both the near-term and the long-term future of human civilization. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:14 - Nuclear fission vs fusion 13:14 - Physics of E=mc^2 18:28 - Is nuclear fusion safe? 23:50 - Chernobyl 30:17 - Geopolitics 32:12 - Extreme scenarios 39:07 - How nuclear fusion works 1:11:59 - Extreme temperatures 1:17:00 - Fusion control and simulation 1:28:54 - Electricity from fusion 2:02:59 - First fusion power plant in 2028 2:09:52 - Energy needs of GPU clusters 2:20:16 - Kardashev scale 2:28:12 - Fermi Paradox
2:36:54

Here's my conversation with David Kirtley (), a nuclear fusion engineer, all about the physics and engineering of nuclear fission, fusion, and the future of energy. David is leading a team that's working to build the world's first commercial fusion power plant by 2028. This was a super technical conversation and a fascinating one, for both the near-term and the long-term future of human civilization. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:14 - Nuclear fission vs fusion 13:14 - Physics of E=mc^2 18:28 - Is nuclear fusion safe? 23:50 - Chernobyl 30:17 - Geopolitics 32:12 - Extreme scenarios 39:07 - How nuclear fusion works 1:11:59 - Extreme temperatures 1:17:00 - Fusion control and simulation 1:28:54 - Electricity from fusion 2:02:59 - First fusion power plant in 2028 2:09:52 - Energy needs of GPU clusters 2:20:16 - Kardashev scale 2:28:12 - Fermi Paradox

Lex Fridman

605,688 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

$600bn, 4% of the grid, Not ready til the 2040s 👆These are all LIES about nuclear power Here's the facts: 1/ '$600bn Cost' This figure is from the 'Smart' Energy Council (renewable lobby group). It extrapolates the cost of Hinkley C (the most expensive nuclear power plant ever) and literally doubles it. Even the CSIRO assumes lower nuclear capital costs for Australia. 2/ '4% of the grid' This figure is also from the 'Smart' Energy Council from dividing 11GW of nuclear capacity by 300GW of renewable capacity. However, Capacity ≠ Generation. 1GW of renewable capacity generates roughly a third of the power of 1GW of nuclear capacity. 3/ 'Not ready til the 2040s' The IAEA predicts it would take 10-15 years for a new to nuclear country to have nuclear power. The is the advice the Australian Government relies on for nuclear yet is being ignored by the PM & Energy Minister. These claims must be exposed. The nuclear disinformation campaign has gone too far. Also, no wonder the private sector isn't interested in nuclear in Australia. It's literally illegal right now in Australia. Learn more about nuclear: ✍️Sign to lift the ban:
0:28

$600bn, 4% of the grid, Not ready til the 2040s 👆These are all LIES about nuclear power Here's the facts: 1/ '$600bn Cost' This figure is from the 'Smart' Energy Council (renewable lobby group). It extrapolates the cost of Hinkley C (the most expensive nuclear power plant ever) and literally doubles it. Even the CSIRO assumes lower nuclear capital costs for Australia. 2/ '4% of the grid' This figure is also from the 'Smart' Energy Council from dividing 11GW of nuclear capacity by 300GW of renewable capacity. However, Capacity ≠ Generation. 1GW of renewable capacity generates roughly a third of the power of 1GW of nuclear capacity. 3/ 'Not ready til the 2040s' The IAEA predicts it would take 10-15 years for a new to nuclear country to have nuclear power. The is the advice the Australian Government relies on for nuclear yet is being ignored by the PM & Energy Minister. These claims must be exposed. The nuclear disinformation campaign has gone too far. Also, no wonder the private sector isn't interested in nuclear in Australia. It's literally illegal right now in Australia. Learn more about nuclear: ✍️Sign to lift the ban:

Will Shackel

39,806 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

As the War Mongers in Europe prepare for an imaginary War of distraction against Russia- A Warning from History. This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.
1:04

As the War Mongers in Europe prepare for an imaginary War of distraction against Russia- A Warning from History. This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.

Chay Bowes

31,696 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.
0:37

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.

Mario Nawfal

6,904,769 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Here's my conversation with Tucker Carlson about Putin, Navalny, Zelenskyy, CIA, NSA, Moscow trip, Jon Stewart, Trump, Israel-Palestine, China, nuclear war, and much more. This was a challenging and fascinating conversation. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:53 - Putin 20:07 - Navalny 41:20 - Moscow 1:00:48 - Freedom of speech 1:07:03 - Jon Stewart 1:19:48 - Ending the War in Ukraine 1:29:15 - Nazis 1:37:42 - Putin's health 1:48:47 - Hitler 1:58:12 - Nuclear war 2:16:31 - Trump 2:33:27 - Israel-Palestine 2:39:37 - Xi Jinping 2:53:34 - Advice for young people 2:58:53 - Hope for the future
3:04:12

Here's my conversation with Tucker Carlson about Putin, Navalny, Zelenskyy, CIA, NSA, Moscow trip, Jon Stewart, Trump, Israel-Palestine, China, nuclear war, and much more. This was a challenging and fascinating conversation. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:53 - Putin 20:07 - Navalny 41:20 - Moscow 1:00:48 - Freedom of speech 1:07:03 - Jon Stewart 1:19:48 - Ending the War in Ukraine 1:29:15 - Nazis 1:37:42 - Putin's health 1:48:47 - Hitler 1:58:12 - Nuclear war 2:16:31 - Trump 2:33:27 - Israel-Palestine 2:39:37 - Xi Jinping 2:53:34 - Advice for young people 2:58:53 - Hope for the future

Lex Fridman

1,439,244 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

What would a nuclear war between India and Pakistan actually look like? This 28-minute simulation follows one, minute by minute — from a five-kiloton tactical nuclear strike on an Indian tank column in the Cholistan desert, to the phone that rings in New Delhi three minutes later, to the week that follows once nobody is deciding any more. Everything in it is built from things that exist: India's 2003 nuclear doctrine of no first use and massive retaliation, the four red lines Pakistan's Khalid Kidwai set out in 2002, the Nasr tactical missile, the eight-minute flight from Sargodha to Delhi, the 2019 Rutgers–Colorado nuclear winter study, and the real crisis of May 2025. Everything except the ending. 0:00 Cold Open 04:10, Day Five 1:20 Chapter 1 · Two Pages 4:26 Chapter 2 · Day Zero 6:39 Chapter 3 · The Four Lines 8:28 Chapter 4 · The Colonel 10:54 Chapter 5 · Seven Minutes 14:33 Chapter 6 · The Phone Call 18:07 Chapter 7 · The Week 22:15 Chapter 8 · After 24:58 Chapter 9 · The Hill #IndiaPakistan #NuclearWar #IndiaVsPakistan #India #Pakistan #NuclearWeapons #NuclearDeterrence #Geopolitics #Simulation #Documentary #WarIndex
28:25

What would a nuclear war between India and Pakistan actually look like? This 28-minute simulation follows one, minute by minute — from a five-kiloton tactical nuclear strike on an Indian tank column in the Cholistan desert, to the phone that rings in New Delhi three minutes later, to the week that follows once nobody is deciding any more. Everything in it is built from things that exist: India's 2003 nuclear doctrine of no first use and massive retaliation, the four red lines Pakistan's Khalid Kidwai set out in 2002, the Nasr tactical missile, the eight-minute flight from Sargodha to Delhi, the 2019 Rutgers–Colorado nuclear winter study, and the real crisis of May 2025. Everything except the ending. 0:00 Cold Open 04:10, Day Five 1:20 Chapter 1 · Two Pages 4:26 Chapter 2 · Day Zero 6:39 Chapter 3 · The Four Lines 8:28 Chapter 4 · The Colonel 10:54 Chapter 5 · Seven Minutes 14:33 Chapter 6 · The Phone Call 18:07 Chapter 7 · The Week 22:15 Chapter 8 · After 24:58 Chapter 9 · The Hill #IndiaPakistan #NuclearWar #IndiaVsPakistan #India #Pakistan #NuclearWeapons #NuclearDeterrence #Geopolitics #Simulation #Documentary #WarIndex

MajorSammerToor

139,693 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

🚨 TRUMP JUST CONFIRMED: IRAN WAS WEEKS AWAY FROM A NUCLEAR WEAPON. HERE'S WHAT THAT MEANS. 🚨 Trump just said on camera: "If we didn't hit within 2 weeks, they would've had a NUCLEAR WEAPON. When crazy people have nuclear weapons, bad things happen." Let that sink in. This is the first time a sitting U.S. president has publicly confirmed how CLOSE Iran was to going nuclear. 💀 450 kg of 60%-enriched uranium — CONFIRMED by Axios 💀 Convertible to weapons grade "within WEEKS" 💀 The U.S. and Israel are now discussing sending SPECIAL FORCES into Iran to seize it 💀 Nuclear experts may be brought in to DILUTE it on-site 💀 This would happen at a "later stage of the war" ⚠️ If Iran was truly weeks away — this war wasn't optional. It was a COUNTDOWN. ⚠️ Every day of delay = one day closer to a nuclear-armed Iran ⚠️ A nuclear Iran changes the ENTIRE balance of power in the Middle East — permanently ⚠️ Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt would all race to build their OWN — triggering a nuclear arms race They're showing you the war's destruction — the missiles, the drones, the oil fires. They're NOT showing you what the world would look like if this war DIDN'T happen — a nuclear-armed Iran controlling the Strait of Hormuz with the ability to hold the global economy HOSTAGE forever. Here's the real question nobody is asking: If Iran was 2 weeks from a nuke → and the war has now been going for 9 days → and Iran STILL has half its missile program → and special forces haven't gone in yet → is the uranium still THERE? The clock didn't stop when the bombs started falling. It's STILL ticking. This isn't just a war for oil or influence. This is a race against TIME to stop the most dangerous weapon on Earth from ending up in the most volatile region on Earth. And we don't know if they're winning that race. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 If this helped you understand what's really at stake, follow + RT. 🚨
0:30

🚨 TRUMP JUST CONFIRMED: IRAN WAS WEEKS AWAY FROM A NUCLEAR WEAPON. HERE'S WHAT THAT MEANS. 🚨 Trump just said on camera: "If we didn't hit within 2 weeks, they would've had a NUCLEAR WEAPON. When crazy people have nuclear weapons, bad things happen." Let that sink in. This is the first time a sitting U.S. president has publicly confirmed how CLOSE Iran was to going nuclear. 💀 450 kg of 60%-enriched uranium — CONFIRMED by Axios 💀 Convertible to weapons grade "within WEEKS" 💀 The U.S. and Israel are now discussing sending SPECIAL FORCES into Iran to seize it 💀 Nuclear experts may be brought in to DILUTE it on-site 💀 This would happen at a "later stage of the war" ⚠️ If Iran was truly weeks away — this war wasn't optional. It was a COUNTDOWN. ⚠️ Every day of delay = one day closer to a nuclear-armed Iran ⚠️ A nuclear Iran changes the ENTIRE balance of power in the Middle East — permanently ⚠️ Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt would all race to build their OWN — triggering a nuclear arms race They're showing you the war's destruction — the missiles, the drones, the oil fires. They're NOT showing you what the world would look like if this war DIDN'T happen — a nuclear-armed Iran controlling the Strait of Hormuz with the ability to hold the global economy HOSTAGE forever. Here's the real question nobody is asking: If Iran was 2 weeks from a nuke → and the war has now been going for 9 days → and Iran STILL has half its missile program → and special forces haven't gone in yet → is the uranium still THERE? The clock didn't stop when the bombs started falling. It's STILL ticking. This isn't just a war for oil or influence. This is a race against TIME to stop the most dangerous weapon on Earth from ending up in the most volatile region on Earth. And we don't know if they're winning that race. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 If this helped you understand what's really at stake, follow + RT. 🚨

JinWoo Kim, IQ 289

18,687 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

THE US JUST RAN THE NUCLEAR MATH ON TEHRAN AND NOBODY IS TELLING YOU HOW BAD IT ACTUALLY IS. What happens the day Trump runs out of conventional options. 💀 500,000 dead in SECONDS - 15-kiloton bomb, Hiroshima power, the SMALLEST 💀 1,500,000 dead within days - conservative estimate 💀 Tehran has 10 million people - 28 TIMES more than Hiroshima 💀 20km radius radiation fallout - silent, invisible, affects millions more 💀 Modern bombs are 1,000x more powerful ⚠️ Iran has 60kg weapons-grade uranium — enough for 2 nuclear bombs RIGHT NOW ⚠️ Nuclear breakout time: 4 WEEKS per IAEA March 2026 report ⚠️ IAEA chief: the war CANNOT erase Iran's nuclear knowledge Here's the logic chain: → February 24: Trump says "my preference is diplomacy" → Week later: US-Israel war on Iran begins, now day 26 → Trump on camera: "I could finish it off in two seconds if I want" → Iran: close the Strait of Hormuz PERMANENTLY if power plants get hit → Strait closure = oil cut to all of Asia = global economic collapse → At that point there are ZERO good options left If Trump was bluffing, why hasn't Iran tested the bluff? If Iran was negotiating in good faith, why did Israel mobilize 400,000 reservists today? Complete silence. This isn't a war about nuclear weapons anymore. This is a war that is CREATING the conditions for them to be used.
1:09

THE US JUST RAN THE NUCLEAR MATH ON TEHRAN AND NOBODY IS TELLING YOU HOW BAD IT ACTUALLY IS. What happens the day Trump runs out of conventional options. 💀 500,000 dead in SECONDS - 15-kiloton bomb, Hiroshima power, the SMALLEST 💀 1,500,000 dead within days - conservative estimate 💀 Tehran has 10 million people - 28 TIMES more than Hiroshima 💀 20km radius radiation fallout - silent, invisible, affects millions more 💀 Modern bombs are 1,000x more powerful ⚠️ Iran has 60kg weapons-grade uranium — enough for 2 nuclear bombs RIGHT NOW ⚠️ Nuclear breakout time: 4 WEEKS per IAEA March 2026 report ⚠️ IAEA chief: the war CANNOT erase Iran's nuclear knowledge Here's the logic chain: → February 24: Trump says "my preference is diplomacy" → Week later: US-Israel war on Iran begins, now day 26 → Trump on camera: "I could finish it off in two seconds if I want" → Iran: close the Strait of Hormuz PERMANENTLY if power plants get hit → Strait closure = oil cut to all of Asia = global economic collapse → At that point there are ZERO good options left If Trump was bluffing, why hasn't Iran tested the bluff? If Iran was negotiating in good faith, why did Israel mobilize 400,000 reservists today? Complete silence. This isn't a war about nuclear weapons anymore. This is a war that is CREATING the conditions for them to be used.

🇺🇸 Ronald Carter

19,157 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The smallest American nuclear bomb is 28 times bigger than the largest conventional one, and no war game that ever used one stopped there Three hundred tons of TNT. That is the lowest setting on the B61-12, the weapon some of Washington now reportedly discusses for Iran, and Steven Starr, who has briefed the UN on these questions, says the number is the danger. It is small enough to look like a bigger bomb to a field commander, and 28 times the size of the biggest conventional weapon America owns. The Cold War knew this. In every NATO war game where tactical nuclear weapons were introduced in Germany, the exchange escalated until it became a full-scale nuclear war, which is why thousands of them were pulled out of Europe in the first place. And Pickax Mountain, under a quarter mile of granite built to survive exactly this, wouldn't even fall. The only thing a strike would destroy is the taboo that has held for eighty years. Brandon Weichert
39:18

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The smallest American nuclear bomb is 28 times bigger than the largest conventional one, and no war game that ever used one stopped there Three hundred tons of TNT. That is the lowest setting on the B61-12, the weapon some of Washington now reportedly discusses for Iran, and Steven Starr, who has briefed the UN on these questions, says the number is the danger. It is small enough to look like a bigger bomb to a field commander, and 28 times the size of the biggest conventional weapon America owns. The Cold War knew this. In every NATO war game where tactical nuclear weapons were introduced in Germany, the exchange escalated until it became a full-scale nuclear war, which is why thousands of them were pulled out of Europe in the first place. And Pickax Mountain, under a quarter mile of granite built to survive exactly this, wouldn't even fall. The only thing a strike would destroy is the taboo that has held for eighty years. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

243,454 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

🔥 “THERE’S ONLY ONE WAY FORWARD — A NUCLEAR WEAPON.” Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) issues his starkest warning: U.S. strategy in the Iran war is rapidly approaching a catastrophic threshold. As the U.S. continues to "ratchet up the attack," the pressure to prove resolve could lead officials to contemplate the unthinkable. “You have to attack more targets… kill more people… and eventually you discover there’s only one way forward and that’s a nuclear weapon.” Macgregor is exposing the catastrophic logic now driving U.S. strategy. He stresses that even approaching nuclear use would have “extremely profound” global consequences — far beyond anything Washington is prepared for. Contrasting this with the stability of the Indian subcontinent, Macgregor notes that nuclear states like Pakistan have historically treated their arsenals as a "necessary deterrent to prevent a war of extermination," rather than a tool for aggression. This clip lays bare the dangerous escalation path unfolding right now — and why the next decision could reshape the entire Middle East conflict. 👉 Watch the full clip from Daniel Davis Deep Dive 🏷️ #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #DanielDavis #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #NuclearRisk #DeepDive
1:19

🔥 “THERE’S ONLY ONE WAY FORWARD — A NUCLEAR WEAPON.” Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) issues his starkest warning: U.S. strategy in the Iran war is rapidly approaching a catastrophic threshold. As the U.S. continues to "ratchet up the attack," the pressure to prove resolve could lead officials to contemplate the unthinkable. “You have to attack more targets… kill more people… and eventually you discover there’s only one way forward and that’s a nuclear weapon.” Macgregor is exposing the catastrophic logic now driving U.S. strategy. He stresses that even approaching nuclear use would have “extremely profound” global consequences — far beyond anything Washington is prepared for. Contrasting this with the stability of the Indian subcontinent, Macgregor notes that nuclear states like Pakistan have historically treated their arsenals as a "necessary deterrent to prevent a war of extermination," rather than a tool for aggression. This clip lays bare the dangerous escalation path unfolding right now — and why the next decision could reshape the entire Middle East conflict. 👉 Watch the full clip from Daniel Davis Deep Dive 🏷️ #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #DanielDavis #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #NuclearRisk #DeepDive

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

53,887 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

‘Donald Trump could use a nuclear weapon against Iran as a GRAND FINALE to declare victory and go home.’ —Matthew Hoh, former Department of Defense & State Department Official who resigned over the Afghanistan war. ‘The danger of the use of a nuclear weapon in this war has always been here. I’ve been afraid that the United States would use a nuclear weapon possibly back in April, against say maybe one of the facilities like Isfahan. The idea presented to President Trump: ‘Mr. President, these are low-yield nuclear weapons. They are a fraction of the size of the Hiroshima bomb. There’s hardly any fallout. You can barely even call these a nuclear weapon. And what we can do is we can drop it on Isfahan. That will seal off that facility, and the Iranians will never be able to get to that enriched uranium. And this way, you can declare victory and go home.’ You could see that same argument can still apply this time, maybe with Pickaxe Mountain or something like that. The idea that it provides for a grand finale for the president of the United States to declare victory and go home.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below 👇 Matthew Hoh
1:27

‘Donald Trump could use a nuclear weapon against Iran as a GRAND FINALE to declare victory and go home.’ —Matthew Hoh, former Department of Defense & State Department Official who resigned over the Afghanistan war. ‘The danger of the use of a nuclear weapon in this war has always been here. I’ve been afraid that the United States would use a nuclear weapon possibly back in April, against say maybe one of the facilities like Isfahan. The idea presented to President Trump: ‘Mr. President, these are low-yield nuclear weapons. They are a fraction of the size of the Hiroshima bomb. There’s hardly any fallout. You can barely even call these a nuclear weapon. And what we can do is we can drop it on Isfahan. That will seal off that facility, and the Iranians will never be able to get to that enriched uranium. And this way, you can declare victory and go home.’ You could see that same argument can still apply this time, maybe with Pickaxe Mountain or something like that. The idea that it provides for a grand finale for the president of the United States to declare victory and go home.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below 👇 Matthew Hoh

Going Underground

37,125 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

Following the conversation with John Mearsheimer, I recently sat down with Jiang Xueqin of Predictive History, where we examine the same crisis through a sharply different lens: - The nuclear issue as a geopolitical pretext rather than an immediate tactical threat, - Why the probability of nuclear use remains extremely low despite rising escalation, - Israel’s deterrence doctrine and the logic behind the “Samson Option,” - Iran’s strategic choice to avoid developing nuclear weapons, - The possibility of a Russian “nuclear umbrella” over Iran, - How prolonged wars reshape regional order. - ⁠How eschatology plays a part in the endless war, and why China may not play a role in this “scripted” spiritual transition. Yet the discussion moves well beyond the world events. We also explore his personal trajectory, his intellectual formation, and his philosophy of life. If there is one lesson to take from Jiang Xueqin, it is this: being consequential matters more than being wealthy. A grounding conversation on power, war, and consequence. Soon on Endgame - Monday, 16 March, 5 PM WIB / 2 AM PST.
0:54

Following the conversation with John Mearsheimer, I recently sat down with Jiang Xueqin of Predictive History, where we examine the same crisis through a sharply different lens: - The nuclear issue as a geopolitical pretext rather than an immediate tactical threat, - Why the probability of nuclear use remains extremely low despite rising escalation, - Israel’s deterrence doctrine and the logic behind the “Samson Option,” - Iran’s strategic choice to avoid developing nuclear weapons, - The possibility of a Russian “nuclear umbrella” over Iran, - How prolonged wars reshape regional order. - ⁠How eschatology plays a part in the endless war, and why China may not play a role in this “scripted” spiritual transition. Yet the discussion moves well beyond the world events. We also explore his personal trajectory, his intellectual formation, and his philosophy of life. If there is one lesson to take from Jiang Xueqin, it is this: being consequential matters more than being wealthy. A grounding conversation on power, war, and consequence. Soon on Endgame - Monday, 16 March, 5 PM WIB / 2 AM PST.

Gita Wirjawan

565,996 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.
1:04

This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.

Chay Bowes

926,789 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.
0:43

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.

Global Strategy

32,658 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israel's nuclear arsenal is the one to watch in this war, and the men who run the world's nuclear powers have never been briefed on what a full exchange does to the planet Professor Steven Starr briefed the UN's disarmament committee on nuclear winter in 2010, and today he fears an Israeli nuclear strike on Iran more than anything else on the board. Israel holds a large arsenal on missiles and submarines, and he thinks a prime minister who faces jail if he leaves office could act irrationally. Asked whether Iran's thousands of conventional missiles are deterrent enough, his answer was that he hopes so, and then he brought up the Samson option. He also notes the worst fallout from a strike on Iran would mostly stay inside Iran, which he reads as one less reason for Israel to hesitate. He doubts Iran's launchers could be knocked out, possibly at first but not for long, because a quarter mile of granite survives even a nuclear blast, and he ends that thought with "I don't know. I hope we don't find out." The bigger war is the one his slides model. A US and Russia exchange would loft enough soot to block the sun for years, crops would fail across the Northern Hemisphere, and most people in those countries would die. He says the heads of nuclear states have never publicly raised it, and a general at the UN once told him he'd never heard any of it.
28:37

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israel's nuclear arsenal is the one to watch in this war, and the men who run the world's nuclear powers have never been briefed on what a full exchange does to the planet Professor Steven Starr briefed the UN's disarmament committee on nuclear winter in 2010, and today he fears an Israeli nuclear strike on Iran more than anything else on the board. Israel holds a large arsenal on missiles and submarines, and he thinks a prime minister who faces jail if he leaves office could act irrationally. Asked whether Iran's thousands of conventional missiles are deterrent enough, his answer was that he hopes so, and then he brought up the Samson option. He also notes the worst fallout from a strike on Iran would mostly stay inside Iran, which he reads as one less reason for Israel to hesitate. He doubts Iran's launchers could be knocked out, possibly at first but not for long, because a quarter mile of granite survives even a nuclear blast, and he ends that thought with "I don't know. I hope we don't find out." The bigger war is the one his slides model. A US and Russia exchange would loft enough soot to block the sun for years, crops would fail across the Northern Hemisphere, and most people in those countries would die. He says the heads of nuclear states have never publicly raised it, and a general at the UN once told him he'd never heard any of it.

Mario Nawfal

246,280 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

IRAN JUST BREACHED IRON DOME AND HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY. THE WAR JUST CHANGED FOREVER. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT IRAN HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY? Here's what comes next, step by step: 🔴 Step 1 — Israel faces the most dangerous decision in its history Dimona is not just a building. It's the nuclear program. Hitting it is Iran saying: "We can reach what you thought was unreachable." 🔴 Step 2 — Israel's war cabinet debates the Samson Option This is not a theory. This is now a live scenario. If Iran can hit Dimona, it can cause a radiological event. That's an existential threat. 🔴 Step 3 — Iran escalates deliberately to force the choice They're not stopping. Wave 71 will come. Iran wants to either trigger nuclear retaliation — or prove Israel won't use nukes. Both outcomes serve Iran. 🔴 Step 4 — If Israel does NOT respond with nuclear force Iran wins the deterrence argument. Forever. Every country watching learns that nukes are a bluff. The entire architecture of nuclear deterrence collapses. 🔴 Step 5 — If Israel DOES activate nuclear doctrine Every Gulf state, every NATO ally, every world power intervenes instantly. The war becomes global within 48 hours. 🔴 Step 6 — The market reaction will be historic Oil goes to $200. Gold to $4,000. Bitcoin either crashes with the global system or moons as fiat collapses. Nobody knows which. That's the danger. 🔴 Step 7 — CENTCOM has no answer for this They claimed 8,000 Iranian targets destroyed. Iran still hit a nuclear site. The entire narrative of "we're winning" just broke. The question is not whether this escalates. The question is how far. Are you positioned for what comes next?
0:16

IRAN JUST BREACHED IRON DOME AND HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY. THE WAR JUST CHANGED FOREVER. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT IRAN HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY? Here's what comes next, step by step: 🔴 Step 1 — Israel faces the most dangerous decision in its history Dimona is not just a building. It's the nuclear program. Hitting it is Iran saying: "We can reach what you thought was unreachable." 🔴 Step 2 — Israel's war cabinet debates the Samson Option This is not a theory. This is now a live scenario. If Iran can hit Dimona, it can cause a radiological event. That's an existential threat. 🔴 Step 3 — Iran escalates deliberately to force the choice They're not stopping. Wave 71 will come. Iran wants to either trigger nuclear retaliation — or prove Israel won't use nukes. Both outcomes serve Iran. 🔴 Step 4 — If Israel does NOT respond with nuclear force Iran wins the deterrence argument. Forever. Every country watching learns that nukes are a bluff. The entire architecture of nuclear deterrence collapses. 🔴 Step 5 — If Israel DOES activate nuclear doctrine Every Gulf state, every NATO ally, every world power intervenes instantly. The war becomes global within 48 hours. 🔴 Step 6 — The market reaction will be historic Oil goes to $200. Gold to $4,000. Bitcoin either crashes with the global system or moons as fiat collapses. Nobody knows which. That's the danger. 🔴 Step 7 — CENTCOM has no answer for this They claimed 8,000 Iranian targets destroyed. Iran still hit a nuclear site. The entire narrative of "we're winning" just broke. The question is not whether this escalates. The question is how far. Are you positioned for what comes next?

🇦🇪 Rashid bin Saeed : راشد بن سعيد

2,413,904 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce