Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

⚠️ Scientists call this the MOST ACCURATE nuclear blast ever shown in cinema... Paired with a terrifying full-scale modern nuclear war simulation. T2 Judgment Day’s legendary scene meets apocalyptic nightmare fuel. Pure dread. 😱 Does the simulation feel even more terrifying than T2? Clip 1: Museum On The Go...

movies_only_x's profile picture

Movies Only 🍿

22,496 subscribers

12,991 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Here's my conversation with Annie Jacobsen (Annie Jacobsen) all about nuclear war, CIA, Area 51, UFOs, and government secrecy. This was a terrifying and fascinating conversation. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:13 - Nuclear war 6:57 - Launch procedure 12:36 - Deterrence 16:09 - Tactical nukes 25:35 - Nuclear submarines 28:35 - Nuclear missiles 35:46 - Nuclear football 44:53 - Missile interceptor system 49:10 - North Korea 55:46 - Nuclear war scenarios 1:04:38 - Warmongers 1:09:06 - President's cognitive ability 1:15:19 - Refusing orders 1:23:17 - Russia and Putin 1:28:23 - Cyberattack 1:29:45 - Ground zero of nuclear war 1:34:24 - Surviving nuclear war 1:38:42 - Nuclear winter 1:49:05 - Alien civilizations 1:54:40 - Extrasensory perception 2:08:25 - Area 51 2:12:23 - UFOs and aliens 2:22:51 - Roswell incident 2:29:30 - CIA assassinations 2:48:23 - Navalny 2:50:48 - KGB 2:57:24 - Hitler and the atomic bomb 3:01:27 - War and human nature 3:04:53 - Hope
3:07:18

Here's my conversation with Annie Jacobsen (Annie Jacobsen) all about nuclear war, CIA, Area 51, UFOs, and government secrecy. This was a terrifying and fascinating conversation. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:13 - Nuclear war 6:57 - Launch procedure 12:36 - Deterrence 16:09 - Tactical nukes 25:35 - Nuclear submarines 28:35 - Nuclear missiles 35:46 - Nuclear football 44:53 - Missile interceptor system 49:10 - North Korea 55:46 - Nuclear war scenarios 1:04:38 - Warmongers 1:09:06 - President's cognitive ability 1:15:19 - Refusing orders 1:23:17 - Russia and Putin 1:28:23 - Cyberattack 1:29:45 - Ground zero of nuclear war 1:34:24 - Surviving nuclear war 1:38:42 - Nuclear winter 1:49:05 - Alien civilizations 1:54:40 - Extrasensory perception 2:08:25 - Area 51 2:12:23 - UFOs and aliens 2:22:51 - Roswell incident 2:29:30 - CIA assassinations 2:48:23 - Navalny 2:50:48 - KGB 2:57:24 - Hitler and the atomic bomb 3:01:27 - War and human nature 3:04:53 - Hope

Lex Fridman

937,246 views • 2 years ago

Here's a 4-hour debate I hosted on the topic of Iran war, its nuclear program, and nuclear proliferation & geopolitics in general with Scott Horton (Scott Horton) and Mark Dubowitz (Mark Dubowitz). This was intense and fascinating! It's here on X in full and is up everywhere else (see comment). Timestamps: 0:00 - Episode highlight 1:15 - Introduction 2:18 - Iran-Israel War 11:00 - Iran's Nuclear Program 42:52 - Nuclear weapons and uranium 54:55 - Nuclear deal 1:20:29 - Iran Nuclear Archive 1:43:06 - Best case and worst case near-term future 2:18:30 - US attack on Iran - Operation Midnight Hammer 2:42:04 - Nuclear proliferation in the future 3:03:02 - Libertarianism 3:15:51 - Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) 3:31:26 - Trump and Peacemaking process 3:36:23 - WW2 3:49:23 - WW3
4:05:15

Here's a 4-hour debate I hosted on the topic of Iran war, its nuclear program, and nuclear proliferation & geopolitics in general with Scott Horton (Scott Horton) and Mark Dubowitz (Mark Dubowitz). This was intense and fascinating! It's here on X in full and is up everywhere else (see comment). Timestamps: 0:00 - Episode highlight 1:15 - Introduction 2:18 - Iran-Israel War 11:00 - Iran's Nuclear Program 42:52 - Nuclear weapons and uranium 54:55 - Nuclear deal 1:20:29 - Iran Nuclear Archive 1:43:06 - Best case and worst case near-term future 2:18:30 - US attack on Iran - Operation Midnight Hammer 2:42:04 - Nuclear proliferation in the future 3:03:02 - Libertarianism 3:15:51 - Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) 3:31:26 - Trump and Peacemaking process 3:36:23 - WW2 3:49:23 - WW3

Lex Fridman

873,500 views • 1 year ago

Here's my conversation with David Kirtley (), a nuclear fusion engineer, all about the physics and engineering of nuclear fission, fusion, and the future of energy. David is leading a team that's working to build the world's first commercial fusion power plant by 2028. This was a super technical conversation and a fascinating one, for both the near-term and the long-term future of human civilization. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:14 - Nuclear fission vs fusion 13:14 - Physics of E=mc^2 18:28 - Is nuclear fusion safe? 23:50 - Chernobyl 30:17 - Geopolitics 32:12 - Extreme scenarios 39:07 - How nuclear fusion works 1:11:59 - Extreme temperatures 1:17:00 - Fusion control and simulation 1:28:54 - Electricity from fusion 2:02:59 - First fusion power plant in 2028 2:09:52 - Energy needs of GPU clusters 2:20:16 - Kardashev scale 2:28:12 - Fermi Paradox
2:36:54

Here's my conversation with David Kirtley (), a nuclear fusion engineer, all about the physics and engineering of nuclear fission, fusion, and the future of energy. David is leading a team that's working to build the world's first commercial fusion power plant by 2028. This was a super technical conversation and a fascinating one, for both the near-term and the long-term future of human civilization. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:14 - Nuclear fission vs fusion 13:14 - Physics of E=mc^2 18:28 - Is nuclear fusion safe? 23:50 - Chernobyl 30:17 - Geopolitics 32:12 - Extreme scenarios 39:07 - How nuclear fusion works 1:11:59 - Extreme temperatures 1:17:00 - Fusion control and simulation 1:28:54 - Electricity from fusion 2:02:59 - First fusion power plant in 2028 2:09:52 - Energy needs of GPU clusters 2:20:16 - Kardashev scale 2:28:12 - Fermi Paradox

Lex Fridman

604,697 views • 9 months ago

$600bn, 4% of the grid, Not ready til the 2040s 👆These are all LIES about nuclear power Here's the facts: 1/ '$600bn Cost' This figure is from the 'Smart' Energy Council (renewable lobby group). It extrapolates the cost of Hinkley C (the most expensive nuclear power plant ever) and literally doubles it. Even the CSIRO assumes lower nuclear capital costs for Australia. 2/ '4% of the grid' This figure is also from the 'Smart' Energy Council from dividing 11GW of nuclear capacity by 300GW of renewable capacity. However, Capacity ≠ Generation. 1GW of renewable capacity generates roughly a third of the power of 1GW of nuclear capacity. 3/ 'Not ready til the 2040s' The IAEA predicts it would take 10-15 years for a new to nuclear country to have nuclear power. The is the advice the Australian Government relies on for nuclear yet is being ignored by the PM & Energy Minister. These claims must be exposed. The nuclear disinformation campaign has gone too far. Also, no wonder the private sector isn't interested in nuclear in Australia. It's literally illegal right now in Australia. Learn more about nuclear: ✍️Sign to lift the ban:
0:28

$600bn, 4% of the grid, Not ready til the 2040s 👆These are all LIES about nuclear power Here's the facts: 1/ '$600bn Cost' This figure is from the 'Smart' Energy Council (renewable lobby group). It extrapolates the cost of Hinkley C (the most expensive nuclear power plant ever) and literally doubles it. Even the CSIRO assumes lower nuclear capital costs for Australia. 2/ '4% of the grid' This figure is also from the 'Smart' Energy Council from dividing 11GW of nuclear capacity by 300GW of renewable capacity. However, Capacity ≠ Generation. 1GW of renewable capacity generates roughly a third of the power of 1GW of nuclear capacity. 3/ 'Not ready til the 2040s' The IAEA predicts it would take 10-15 years for a new to nuclear country to have nuclear power. The is the advice the Australian Government relies on for nuclear yet is being ignored by the PM & Energy Minister. These claims must be exposed. The nuclear disinformation campaign has gone too far. Also, no wonder the private sector isn't interested in nuclear in Australia. It's literally illegal right now in Australia. Learn more about nuclear: ✍️Sign to lift the ban:

Will Shackel

39,795 views • 1 year ago

As the War Mongers in Europe prepare for an imaginary War of distraction against Russia- A Warning from History. This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.
1:04

As the War Mongers in Europe prepare for an imaginary War of distraction against Russia- A Warning from History. This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.

Chay Bowes

31,696 views • 8 months ago

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.
0:37

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.

Mario Nawfal

6,904,590 views • 2 years ago

Here's my conversation with Tucker Carlson about Putin, Navalny, Zelenskyy, CIA, NSA, Moscow trip, Jon Stewart, Trump, Israel-Palestine, China, nuclear war, and much more. This was a challenging and fascinating conversation. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:53 - Putin 20:07 - Navalny 41:20 - Moscow 1:00:48 - Freedom of speech 1:07:03 - Jon Stewart 1:19:48 - Ending the War in Ukraine 1:29:15 - Nazis 1:37:42 - Putin's health 1:48:47 - Hitler 1:58:12 - Nuclear war 2:16:31 - Trump 2:33:27 - Israel-Palestine 2:39:37 - Xi Jinping 2:53:34 - Advice for young people 2:58:53 - Hope for the future
3:04:12

Here's my conversation with Tucker Carlson about Putin, Navalny, Zelenskyy, CIA, NSA, Moscow trip, Jon Stewart, Trump, Israel-Palestine, China, nuclear war, and much more. This was a challenging and fascinating conversation. It's here on X in full, and is up on YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:53 - Putin 20:07 - Navalny 41:20 - Moscow 1:00:48 - Freedom of speech 1:07:03 - Jon Stewart 1:19:48 - Ending the War in Ukraine 1:29:15 - Nazis 1:37:42 - Putin's health 1:48:47 - Hitler 1:58:12 - Nuclear war 2:16:31 - Trump 2:33:27 - Israel-Palestine 2:39:37 - Xi Jinping 2:53:34 - Advice for young people 2:58:53 - Hope for the future

Lex Fridman

1,439,006 views • 2 years ago

THE US JUST RAN THE NUCLEAR MATH ON TEHRAN AND NOBODY IS TELLING YOU HOW BAD IT ACTUALLY IS. What happens the day Trump runs out of conventional options. 💀 500,000 dead in SECONDS - 15-kiloton bomb, Hiroshima power, the SMALLEST 💀 1,500,000 dead within days - conservative estimate 💀 Tehran has 10 million people - 28 TIMES more than Hiroshima 💀 20km radius radiation fallout - silent, invisible, affects millions more 💀 Modern bombs are 1,000x more powerful ⚠️ Iran has 60kg weapons-grade uranium — enough for 2 nuclear bombs RIGHT NOW ⚠️ Nuclear breakout time: 4 WEEKS per IAEA March 2026 report ⚠️ IAEA chief: the war CANNOT erase Iran's nuclear knowledge Here's the logic chain: → February 24: Trump says "my preference is diplomacy" → Week later: US-Israel war on Iran begins, now day 26 → Trump on camera: "I could finish it off in two seconds if I want" → Iran: close the Strait of Hormuz PERMANENTLY if power plants get hit → Strait closure = oil cut to all of Asia = global economic collapse → At that point there are ZERO good options left If Trump was bluffing, why hasn't Iran tested the bluff? If Iran was negotiating in good faith, why did Israel mobilize 400,000 reservists today? Complete silence. This isn't a war about nuclear weapons anymore. This is a war that is CREATING the conditions for them to be used.
1:09

THE US JUST RAN THE NUCLEAR MATH ON TEHRAN AND NOBODY IS TELLING YOU HOW BAD IT ACTUALLY IS. What happens the day Trump runs out of conventional options. 💀 500,000 dead in SECONDS - 15-kiloton bomb, Hiroshima power, the SMALLEST 💀 1,500,000 dead within days - conservative estimate 💀 Tehran has 10 million people - 28 TIMES more than Hiroshima 💀 20km radius radiation fallout - silent, invisible, affects millions more 💀 Modern bombs are 1,000x more powerful ⚠️ Iran has 60kg weapons-grade uranium — enough for 2 nuclear bombs RIGHT NOW ⚠️ Nuclear breakout time: 4 WEEKS per IAEA March 2026 report ⚠️ IAEA chief: the war CANNOT erase Iran's nuclear knowledge Here's the logic chain: → February 24: Trump says "my preference is diplomacy" → Week later: US-Israel war on Iran begins, now day 26 → Trump on camera: "I could finish it off in two seconds if I want" → Iran: close the Strait of Hormuz PERMANENTLY if power plants get hit → Strait closure = oil cut to all of Asia = global economic collapse → At that point there are ZERO good options left If Trump was bluffing, why hasn't Iran tested the bluff? If Iran was negotiating in good faith, why did Israel mobilize 400,000 reservists today? Complete silence. This isn't a war about nuclear weapons anymore. This is a war that is CREATING the conditions for them to be used.

🇺🇸 Ronald Carter

19,157 views • 4 months ago

🚨 TRUMP JUST CONFIRMED: IRAN WAS WEEKS AWAY FROM A NUCLEAR WEAPON. HERE'S WHAT THAT MEANS. 🚨 Trump just said on camera: "If we didn't hit within 2 weeks, they would've had a NUCLEAR WEAPON. When crazy people have nuclear weapons, bad things happen." Let that sink in. This is the first time a sitting U.S. president has publicly confirmed how CLOSE Iran was to going nuclear. 💀 450 kg of 60%-enriched uranium — CONFIRMED by Axios 💀 Convertible to weapons grade "within WEEKS" 💀 The U.S. and Israel are now discussing sending SPECIAL FORCES into Iran to seize it 💀 Nuclear experts may be brought in to DILUTE it on-site 💀 This would happen at a "later stage of the war" ⚠️ If Iran was truly weeks away — this war wasn't optional. It was a COUNTDOWN. ⚠️ Every day of delay = one day closer to a nuclear-armed Iran ⚠️ A nuclear Iran changes the ENTIRE balance of power in the Middle East — permanently ⚠️ Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt would all race to build their OWN — triggering a nuclear arms race They're showing you the war's destruction — the missiles, the drones, the oil fires. They're NOT showing you what the world would look like if this war DIDN'T happen — a nuclear-armed Iran controlling the Strait of Hormuz with the ability to hold the global economy HOSTAGE forever. Here's the real question nobody is asking: If Iran was 2 weeks from a nuke → and the war has now been going for 9 days → and Iran STILL has half its missile program → and special forces haven't gone in yet → is the uranium still THERE? The clock didn't stop when the bombs started falling. It's STILL ticking. This isn't just a war for oil or influence. This is a race against TIME to stop the most dangerous weapon on Earth from ending up in the most volatile region on Earth. And we don't know if they're winning that race. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 If this helped you understand what's really at stake, follow + RT. 🚨
0:30

🚨 TRUMP JUST CONFIRMED: IRAN WAS WEEKS AWAY FROM A NUCLEAR WEAPON. HERE'S WHAT THAT MEANS. 🚨 Trump just said on camera: "If we didn't hit within 2 weeks, they would've had a NUCLEAR WEAPON. When crazy people have nuclear weapons, bad things happen." Let that sink in. This is the first time a sitting U.S. president has publicly confirmed how CLOSE Iran was to going nuclear. 💀 450 kg of 60%-enriched uranium — CONFIRMED by Axios 💀 Convertible to weapons grade "within WEEKS" 💀 The U.S. and Israel are now discussing sending SPECIAL FORCES into Iran to seize it 💀 Nuclear experts may be brought in to DILUTE it on-site 💀 This would happen at a "later stage of the war" ⚠️ If Iran was truly weeks away — this war wasn't optional. It was a COUNTDOWN. ⚠️ Every day of delay = one day closer to a nuclear-armed Iran ⚠️ A nuclear Iran changes the ENTIRE balance of power in the Middle East — permanently ⚠️ Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt would all race to build their OWN — triggering a nuclear arms race They're showing you the war's destruction — the missiles, the drones, the oil fires. They're NOT showing you what the world would look like if this war DIDN'T happen — a nuclear-armed Iran controlling the Strait of Hormuz with the ability to hold the global economy HOSTAGE forever. Here's the real question nobody is asking: If Iran was 2 weeks from a nuke → and the war has now been going for 9 days → and Iran STILL has half its missile program → and special forces haven't gone in yet → is the uranium still THERE? The clock didn't stop when the bombs started falling. It's STILL ticking. This isn't just a war for oil or influence. This is a race against TIME to stop the most dangerous weapon on Earth from ending up in the most volatile region on Earth. And we don't know if they're winning that race. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 If this helped you understand what's really at stake, follow + RT. 🚨

JinWoo Kim, IQ 289

18,687 views • 5 months ago

🔥 “THERE’S ONLY ONE WAY FORWARD — A NUCLEAR WEAPON.” Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) issues his starkest warning: U.S. strategy in the Iran war is rapidly approaching a catastrophic threshold. As the U.S. continues to "ratchet up the attack," the pressure to prove resolve could lead officials to contemplate the unthinkable. “You have to attack more targets… kill more people… and eventually you discover there’s only one way forward and that’s a nuclear weapon.” Macgregor is exposing the catastrophic logic now driving U.S. strategy. He stresses that even approaching nuclear use would have “extremely profound” global consequences — far beyond anything Washington is prepared for. Contrasting this with the stability of the Indian subcontinent, Macgregor notes that nuclear states like Pakistan have historically treated their arsenals as a "necessary deterrent to prevent a war of extermination," rather than a tool for aggression. This clip lays bare the dangerous escalation path unfolding right now — and why the next decision could reshape the entire Middle East conflict. 👉 Watch the full clip from Daniel Davis Deep Dive 🏷️ #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #DanielDavis #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #NuclearRisk #DeepDive
1:19

🔥 “THERE’S ONLY ONE WAY FORWARD — A NUCLEAR WEAPON.” Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) issues his starkest warning: U.S. strategy in the Iran war is rapidly approaching a catastrophic threshold. As the U.S. continues to "ratchet up the attack," the pressure to prove resolve could lead officials to contemplate the unthinkable. “You have to attack more targets… kill more people… and eventually you discover there’s only one way forward and that’s a nuclear weapon.” Macgregor is exposing the catastrophic logic now driving U.S. strategy. He stresses that even approaching nuclear use would have “extremely profound” global consequences — far beyond anything Washington is prepared for. Contrasting this with the stability of the Indian subcontinent, Macgregor notes that nuclear states like Pakistan have historically treated their arsenals as a "necessary deterrent to prevent a war of extermination," rather than a tool for aggression. This clip lays bare the dangerous escalation path unfolding right now — and why the next decision could reshape the entire Middle East conflict. 👉 Watch the full clip from Daniel Davis Deep Dive 🏷️ #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #DanielDavis #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #NuclearRisk #DeepDive

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

53,887 views • 2 months ago

Following the conversation with John Mearsheimer, I recently sat down with Jiang Xueqin of Predictive History, where we examine the same crisis through a sharply different lens: - The nuclear issue as a geopolitical pretext rather than an immediate tactical threat, - Why the probability of nuclear use remains extremely low despite rising escalation, - Israel’s deterrence doctrine and the logic behind the “Samson Option,” - Iran’s strategic choice to avoid developing nuclear weapons, - The possibility of a Russian “nuclear umbrella” over Iran, - How prolonged wars reshape regional order. - ⁠How eschatology plays a part in the endless war, and why China may not play a role in this “scripted” spiritual transition. Yet the discussion moves well beyond the world events. We also explore his personal trajectory, his intellectual formation, and his philosophy of life. If there is one lesson to take from Jiang Xueqin, it is this: being consequential matters more than being wealthy. A grounding conversation on power, war, and consequence. Soon on Endgame - Monday, 16 March, 5 PM WIB / 2 AM PST.
0:54

Following the conversation with John Mearsheimer, I recently sat down with Jiang Xueqin of Predictive History, where we examine the same crisis through a sharply different lens: - The nuclear issue as a geopolitical pretext rather than an immediate tactical threat, - Why the probability of nuclear use remains extremely low despite rising escalation, - Israel’s deterrence doctrine and the logic behind the “Samson Option,” - Iran’s strategic choice to avoid developing nuclear weapons, - The possibility of a Russian “nuclear umbrella” over Iran, - How prolonged wars reshape regional order. - ⁠How eschatology plays a part in the endless war, and why China may not play a role in this “scripted” spiritual transition. Yet the discussion moves well beyond the world events. We also explore his personal trajectory, his intellectual formation, and his philosophy of life. If there is one lesson to take from Jiang Xueqin, it is this: being consequential matters more than being wealthy. A grounding conversation on power, war, and consequence. Soon on Endgame - Monday, 16 March, 5 PM WIB / 2 AM PST.

Gita Wirjawan

564,632 views • 5 months ago

This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.
1:04

This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.

Chay Bowes

926,789 views • 2 years ago

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.
0:43

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.

Global Strategy

32,658 views • 7 months ago

IRAN JUST BREACHED IRON DOME AND HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY. THE WAR JUST CHANGED FOREVER. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT IRAN HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY? Here's what comes next, step by step: 🔴 Step 1 — Israel faces the most dangerous decision in its history Dimona is not just a building. It's the nuclear program. Hitting it is Iran saying: "We can reach what you thought was unreachable." 🔴 Step 2 — Israel's war cabinet debates the Samson Option This is not a theory. This is now a live scenario. If Iran can hit Dimona, it can cause a radiological event. That's an existential threat. 🔴 Step 3 — Iran escalates deliberately to force the choice They're not stopping. Wave 71 will come. Iran wants to either trigger nuclear retaliation — or prove Israel won't use nukes. Both outcomes serve Iran. 🔴 Step 4 — If Israel does NOT respond with nuclear force Iran wins the deterrence argument. Forever. Every country watching learns that nukes are a bluff. The entire architecture of nuclear deterrence collapses. 🔴 Step 5 — If Israel DOES activate nuclear doctrine Every Gulf state, every NATO ally, every world power intervenes instantly. The war becomes global within 48 hours. 🔴 Step 6 — The market reaction will be historic Oil goes to $200. Gold to $4,000. Bitcoin either crashes with the global system or moons as fiat collapses. Nobody knows which. That's the danger. 🔴 Step 7 — CENTCOM has no answer for this They claimed 8,000 Iranian targets destroyed. Iran still hit a nuclear site. The entire narrative of "we're winning" just broke. The question is not whether this escalates. The question is how far. Are you positioned for what comes next?
0:16

IRAN JUST BREACHED IRON DOME AND HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY. THE WAR JUST CHANGED FOREVER. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT IRAN HIT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR FACILITY? Here's what comes next, step by step: 🔴 Step 1 — Israel faces the most dangerous decision in its history Dimona is not just a building. It's the nuclear program. Hitting it is Iran saying: "We can reach what you thought was unreachable." 🔴 Step 2 — Israel's war cabinet debates the Samson Option This is not a theory. This is now a live scenario. If Iran can hit Dimona, it can cause a radiological event. That's an existential threat. 🔴 Step 3 — Iran escalates deliberately to force the choice They're not stopping. Wave 71 will come. Iran wants to either trigger nuclear retaliation — or prove Israel won't use nukes. Both outcomes serve Iran. 🔴 Step 4 — If Israel does NOT respond with nuclear force Iran wins the deterrence argument. Forever. Every country watching learns that nukes are a bluff. The entire architecture of nuclear deterrence collapses. 🔴 Step 5 — If Israel DOES activate nuclear doctrine Every Gulf state, every NATO ally, every world power intervenes instantly. The war becomes global within 48 hours. 🔴 Step 6 — The market reaction will be historic Oil goes to $200. Gold to $4,000. Bitcoin either crashes with the global system or moons as fiat collapses. Nobody knows which. That's the danger. 🔴 Step 7 — CENTCOM has no answer for this They claimed 8,000 Iranian targets destroyed. Iran still hit a nuclear site. The entire narrative of "we're winning" just broke. The question is not whether this escalates. The question is how far. Are you positioned for what comes next?

🇦🇪 Rashid bin Saeed : راشد بن سعيد

2,413,904 views • 5 months ago

This clip is EXTREMELY important to understand why Trump bombed Iran’s nuclear facilities. Trump made a deal with King Salman and MBS to work together to bring peace to the Middle East. They all agreed that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, and the US MIL were the only ones who could successfully do what we did with the B-2 bombers and our bunker busters. This was the plan all along. It was not just Israel who did not want Iran to have a nuclear weapon, neither did the Saudis, Qatar, UAE, etc. Even Russia and China turned their backs on Iran and agreed to stand down while Trump neutralized their nuclear capabilities, which was actually Obama’s creation via the Iran Deal. This is also why the peace deal in the Middle East will not fail. Because the leaders of the region, and the entire Arab/Muslim world, already agreed that the fighting must stop. The deal was made long ago. We are just witnessing the rollout. Trump and MBS are allies in this global shadow war and game of thrones.
0:53

This clip is EXTREMELY important to understand why Trump bombed Iran’s nuclear facilities. Trump made a deal with King Salman and MBS to work together to bring peace to the Middle East. They all agreed that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, and the US MIL were the only ones who could successfully do what we did with the B-2 bombers and our bunker busters. This was the plan all along. It was not just Israel who did not want Iran to have a nuclear weapon, neither did the Saudis, Qatar, UAE, etc. Even Russia and China turned their backs on Iran and agreed to stand down while Trump neutralized their nuclear capabilities, which was actually Obama’s creation via the Iran Deal. This is also why the peace deal in the Middle East will not fail. Because the leaders of the region, and the entire Arab/Muslim world, already agreed that the fighting must stop. The deal was made long ago. We are just witnessing the rollout. Trump and MBS are allies in this global shadow war and game of thrones.

Clandestine

315,047 views • 9 months ago

🚨🚨🚨 IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER JUST SAID THE MOST TERRIFYING 15 WORDS OF THIS ENTIRE WAR. READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 🚨🚨🚨 "They struck our nuclear facilities, but they could not destroy Iran's nuclear program." That's Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi — CONFIRMING the strikes hit nuclear sites. And telling the world it didn't work. Let that sink in. 💀 The US used its most powerful bunker-buster bombs on Natanz 💀 Iran is publicly CONFIRMING the nuclear sites were hit 💀 And in the SAME sentence saying the program SURVIVED 💀 Iran isn't denying, hiding, or deflecting — they're TAUNTING 💀 "You hit us with everything you had. We're STILL here." ⚠️ The US spent $2,000,000,000,000+ developing the most advanced bunker-buster arsenal on Earth — specifically for this moment. Iran says it wasn't enough. ⚠️ Israel destroyed Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 with ONE strike and ended Iraq's nuclear program forever. Iran just took the same hit and said "try again." The media is showing you "US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities" like it's mission accomplished. They're NOT showing you that Iran just told the ENTIRE world: our nuclear program is deeper, more dispersed, and more protected than your best weapons can reach. Here's what that means → and what comes NEXT: → Iran built Natanz underground. The US bombed it. Iran says it survived. → Iran built Fordow INSIDE A MOUNTAIN. If Natanz survived, Fordow is untouchable. → Iran has spent 20 years building redundancy — multiple sites, multiple depths, multiple locations → The US just used its BEST shot. If it didn't work, there is no Plan B short of a nuclear weapon. Now here's the part nobody is saying out loud: Iran's nuclear program just went from "peaceful enrichment" to "existential survival." Before today, Iran could negotiate. They had leverage. They could trade their program for sanctions relief. After today? Their nuclear facilities have been BOMBED. The diplomatic path is DEAD. If you're Iran and your "peaceful" nuclear sites were just attacked — what's the argument for NOT building a weapon anymore? The US didn't destroy Iran's nuclear program. They just gave Iran the justification to FINISH it. Every nuclear expert on Earth is thinking the same thing right now: the clock to an Iranian bomb just got shorter, not longer. What happens next: → Iran accelerates enrichment at sites the US CAN'T reach → Iran withdraws from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) → The IAEA loses ALL access to Iranian nuclear sites → Within 12-18 months, Iran has enough material for a weapon → And the world has ZERO visibility into what's happening underground The most dangerous sentence in geopolitics isn't a threat. It's "you hit us and we're still standing." Iran just said it. To the entire world. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨
0:35

🚨🚨🚨 IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER JUST SAID THE MOST TERRIFYING 15 WORDS OF THIS ENTIRE WAR. READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 🚨🚨🚨 "They struck our nuclear facilities, but they could not destroy Iran's nuclear program." That's Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi — CONFIRMING the strikes hit nuclear sites. And telling the world it didn't work. Let that sink in. 💀 The US used its most powerful bunker-buster bombs on Natanz 💀 Iran is publicly CONFIRMING the nuclear sites were hit 💀 And in the SAME sentence saying the program SURVIVED 💀 Iran isn't denying, hiding, or deflecting — they're TAUNTING 💀 "You hit us with everything you had. We're STILL here." ⚠️ The US spent $2,000,000,000,000+ developing the most advanced bunker-buster arsenal on Earth — specifically for this moment. Iran says it wasn't enough. ⚠️ Israel destroyed Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 with ONE strike and ended Iraq's nuclear program forever. Iran just took the same hit and said "try again." The media is showing you "US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities" like it's mission accomplished. They're NOT showing you that Iran just told the ENTIRE world: our nuclear program is deeper, more dispersed, and more protected than your best weapons can reach. Here's what that means → and what comes NEXT: → Iran built Natanz underground. The US bombed it. Iran says it survived. → Iran built Fordow INSIDE A MOUNTAIN. If Natanz survived, Fordow is untouchable. → Iran has spent 20 years building redundancy — multiple sites, multiple depths, multiple locations → The US just used its BEST shot. If it didn't work, there is no Plan B short of a nuclear weapon. Now here's the part nobody is saying out loud: Iran's nuclear program just went from "peaceful enrichment" to "existential survival." Before today, Iran could negotiate. They had leverage. They could trade their program for sanctions relief. After today? Their nuclear facilities have been BOMBED. The diplomatic path is DEAD. If you're Iran and your "peaceful" nuclear sites were just attacked — what's the argument for NOT building a weapon anymore? The US didn't destroy Iran's nuclear program. They just gave Iran the justification to FINISH it. Every nuclear expert on Earth is thinking the same thing right now: the clock to an Iranian bomb just got shorter, not longer. What happens next: → Iran accelerates enrichment at sites the US CAN'T reach → Iran withdraws from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) → The IAEA loses ALL access to Iranian nuclear sites → Within 12-18 months, Iran has enough material for a weapon → And the world has ZERO visibility into what's happening underground The most dangerous sentence in geopolitics isn't a threat. It's "you hit us and we're still standing." Iran just said it. To the entire world. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨

🇨🇳 陈杰森 Jason Chen

813,482 views • 5 months ago

23 years ago last week (fashionably late😆), Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines hit theaters — July 2, 2003. Terminator was groundbreaking. T2 is an all-time sequel masterpiece (Cameron really does have a gift for epic follow-ups — Aliens & T2). But T3? I actually enjoyed it a lot more than most people did. Kristanna Loken absolutely nails it as the T-X — she was cold, relentless, and terrifying in her own way. Robert Patrick set an insanely high bar as the T-1000, but she held her own. And that ending? Brilliant. It made perfect sense within the franchise’s canon, even though we were all expecting something different. Oh… and did you catch the Commodore PET John Connor walks past right at the end? Watch closely — it’s a awesome Commodore Easter egg. What did you think of T3? Underrated, hated, or somewhere in between? (Video used under Fair Use)
4:07

23 years ago last week (fashionably late😆), Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines hit theaters — July 2, 2003. Terminator was groundbreaking. T2 is an all-time sequel masterpiece (Cameron really does have a gift for epic follow-ups — Aliens & T2). But T3? I actually enjoyed it a lot more than most people did. Kristanna Loken absolutely nails it as the T-X — she was cold, relentless, and terrifying in her own way. Robert Patrick set an insanely high bar as the T-1000, but she held her own. And that ending? Brilliant. It made perfect sense within the franchise’s canon, even though we were all expecting something different. Oh… and did you catch the Commodore PET John Connor walks past right at the end? Watch closely — it’s a awesome Commodore Easter egg. What did you think of T3? Underrated, hated, or somewhere in between? (Video used under Fair Use)

Commodore Computer Museum 🕹

48,942 views • 1 month ago

The nuclear pretext for the Iran war is collapsing — and the evidence comes straight from Trump’s own words. ⚠️ In this clip, I lay out what the intelligence community and the military confirmed for years: “there was no nuclear weapons program… 2018, 2025, 2026, Operation Midnight Hammer.” That means the stated justification for launching the Iran war was false — and Trump inadvertently exposes that himself. When pressed on what triggered the February 28, 2026 attack, he couldn’t answer: “there was nothing… at least nothing that he’s admitting to.” I explain how this aligns with Joe Kent’s account that Netanyahu pushed Trump to act based on a one‑time opportunity to assassinate Iran’s supreme leader — a reason Trump still refuses to acknowledge. Watch the full clip to see how these contradictions are reshaping the truth about U.S. strategy, the Iran war, and the wider Middle East conflict. ▶️ 🏷️#IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #StraitOfHormuz #DanielDavisDeepDive #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #ForeignPolicy #EnergyCrisis #GlobalSecurity
2:28

The nuclear pretext for the Iran war is collapsing — and the evidence comes straight from Trump’s own words. ⚠️ In this clip, I lay out what the intelligence community and the military confirmed for years: “there was no nuclear weapons program… 2018, 2025, 2026, Operation Midnight Hammer.” That means the stated justification for launching the Iran war was false — and Trump inadvertently exposes that himself. When pressed on what triggered the February 28, 2026 attack, he couldn’t answer: “there was nothing… at least nothing that he’s admitting to.” I explain how this aligns with Joe Kent’s account that Netanyahu pushed Trump to act based on a one‑time opportunity to assassinate Iran’s supreme leader — a reason Trump still refuses to acknowledge. Watch the full clip to see how these contradictions are reshaping the truth about U.S. strategy, the Iran war, and the wider Middle East conflict. ▶️ 🏷️#IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #StraitOfHormuz #DanielDavisDeepDive #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #ForeignPolicy #EnergyCrisis #GlobalSecurity

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

12,194 views • 1 month ago