Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Scientists have estimated that rising temperatures from human-caused climate change were responsible for roughly 16,500 deaths in European cities this summer, using modelling to project the toll before official data is released. by Dan Lawler

AFP News Agency

2,403,751 subscribers

12,939 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

European countries reported more than 10,000 excess deaths during the record-breaking heatwave that hit western Europe in late June, data showed. Scientists said the temperatures would have been ‘virtually impossible’ without human-caused climate change

European countries reported more than 10,000 excess deaths during the record-breaking heatwave that hit western Europe in late June, data showed. Scientists said the temperatures would have been ‘virtually impossible’ without human-caused climate change

Reuters

64,779 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

GMB Weather Presenter Laura Tobin Claims There Were 2,700 Heat-Related Deaths During May and June Heatwaves, 42% Attributed to “Human Caused Climate Change” 🌞 GMB weather presenter Laura Tobin stated that 2,700 people died from excess heat during the first two heatwaves of the year in May and June. She said climate change made temperatures 3 or 4 degrees Celsius hotter than they would have been otherwise, with 42% of the deaths attributed to human-caused climate change. Tobin noted projections that in 30 years the UK could widely see 40°C temperatures, with peaks at 45°C. She also mentioned comments from fire brigade officials that in the future they may have to choose which fires to put out and which streets and houses to save due to limited resources.

GMB Weather Presenter Laura Tobin Claims There Were 2,700 Heat-Related Deaths During May and June Heatwaves, 42% Attributed to “Human Caused Climate Change” 🌞 GMB weather presenter Laura Tobin stated that 2,700 people died from excess heat during the first two heatwaves of the year in May and June. She said climate change made temperatures 3 or 4 degrees Celsius hotter than they would have been otherwise, with 42% of the deaths attributed to human-caused climate change. Tobin noted projections that in 30 years the UK could widely see 40°C temperatures, with peaks at 45°C. She also mentioned comments from fire brigade officials that in the future they may have to choose which fires to put out and which streets and houses to save due to limited resources.

Skint Eastwood

16,343 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🧵You may have seen a misleading climate related deaths graph used by climate change deniers. It originated from Bjorn Lomborg using data that included policy & war related deaths. He has been spreading a misleading statistic on Fox news. This 2 part video debunks it. #climate

🧵You may have seen a misleading climate related deaths graph used by climate change deniers. It originated from Bjorn Lomborg using data that included policy & war related deaths. He has been spreading a misleading statistic on Fox news. This 2 part video debunks it. #climate

BONUS🌍

277,211 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Authorities in central Greece said on Thursday that they had dredged more than 100 tons of dead fish from the waters around the port of Volos, a scenic summer destination. The mass deaths of the fish were most likely caused by climate change.

Authorities in central Greece said on Thursday that they had dredged more than 100 tons of dead fish from the waters around the port of Volos, a scenic summer destination. The mass deaths of the fish were most likely caused by climate change.

The New York Times

119,086 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Lack of snow is causing problems for ski resorts and other businesses in the Western U.S. that rely on wintry conditions. The problem isn't lack of precipitation but temperatures that are much too warm, made worse by human-caused climate change.

Lack of snow is causing problems for ski resorts and other businesses in the Western U.S. that rely on wintry conditions. The problem isn't lack of precipitation but temperatures that are much too warm, made worse by human-caused climate change.

The Associated Press

126,193 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

"We are dying from climate change." WHO 'Special Envoy for Climate Change and Health', Vanessa Kerry: "We're still going to have 1.2 billion climate migrants by 2050.... There should be 132 million people driven into poverty from climate change." "So this is an incredibly real crisis that we're facing, that is impacting human lives, impacting human well-being."

"We are dying from climate change." WHO 'Special Envoy for Climate Change and Health', Vanessa Kerry: "We're still going to have 1.2 billion climate migrants by 2050.... There should be 132 million people driven into poverty from climate change." "So this is an incredibly real crisis that we're facing, that is impacting human lives, impacting human well-being."

Wide Awake Media

195,403 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Failed former Gov Jay Inslee has gone viral for claiming that the Spokane fires were caused by "climate change" even though we knew early that it was "human-caused," and now a suspect is in custody I joined NEWSMAX to discuss

Failed former Gov Jay Inslee has gone viral for claiming that the Spokane fires were caused by "climate change" even though we knew early that it was "human-caused," and now a suspect is in custody I joined NEWSMAX to discuss

Ari Hoffman

10,817 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🔥 Heat is killing. Extreme temperatures across Europe are claiming lives on an unprecedented scale More than 10,000 people have already died, according to data from the European mortality monitoring system EuroMOMO. Over 9,000 of the victims were aged 65 or older. The heatwave shattered temperature records in several countries, while scientists from World Weather Attribution said such an intense June heatwave would have been virtually impossible without climate change.

🔥 Heat is killing. Extreme temperatures across Europe are claiming lives on an unprecedented scale More than 10,000 people have already died, according to data from the European mortality monitoring system EuroMOMO. Over 9,000 of the victims were aged 65 or older. The heatwave shattered temperature records in several countries, while scientists from World Weather Attribution said such an intense June heatwave would have been virtually impossible without climate change.

NEXTA

69,537 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Experts say the devastating flash floods in Nepal were likely caused by a glacial collapse in the Himalayas, and that climate change increases the risk of such events. Once again, communities least responsible for climate change bear the brunt of its impacts. Sustained international support is essential as the authorities respond to the catastrophe.

Experts say the devastating flash floods in Nepal were likely caused by a glacial collapse in the Himalayas, and that climate change increases the risk of such events. Once again, communities least responsible for climate change bear the brunt of its impacts. Sustained international support is essential as the authorities respond to the catastrophe.

Human Rights Watch

152,412 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

For years, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, has claimed that human-caused climate change has accelerated sea level rise. But that claim is false. There is no scientific evidence of accelerated sea level rise since the mid-19th Century, and thus none showing human-created emissions caused an acceleration in recent decades. This does not mean that climate change isn’t happening. It is. It simply means that it has not caused the sea level to rise at a rate any higher than one would expect without human-caused climate change. Not only that, but the top scientists know this fact and have deliberately misrepresented it for years, deceiving the public. In September, I reported on one of the first global studies of sea level rise that used tide-gauge data, which is the only real-world data that goes back long enough, to the mid-19th Century, that would allow one to detect whether sea level rise had accelerated, decelerated, or remained steady. Since then, I exchanged over 50 emails with one of the world’s leading sea level rise scientists, Robert Kopp from Rutgers University, and heard back from IPCC, NASA, and NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. What I learned shocked me. For years, the world’s top scientists have known that they cannot prove there has been an acceleration of sea level rise, and yet they have told the public that they can. Not only that, in the process of this exchange, I gained a glimpse into how the scientists have been able to mislead journalists, policymakers, and the wider public for so long. You might think this is either old news or unimportant. Some climate scientists in years past have pointed out that the real-world data do not support claims of acceleration. And in recent years, a supposed increase in natural disasters from climate change has eclipsed sea level rise in terms of attention-grabbing headlines. But sea level rise has, since the 1990s, been the main justification for apocalyptic climate claims, and past efforts to debunk sea level rise have failed to show that scientists were deliberately misleading. The media and others have published terrifying maps of the future showing cities underwater. Accelerated sea level is one of the main justifications for predicting very high costs for adapting to climate change. And while good scientists have debunked acceleration claims in the past, they did not clearly show how IPCC scientists engaged in their manipulations. Not only can I prove that the real-world data do not support the claims that there has been an acceleration, I can show that the scientists deliberately misrepresented their research, and how they did it, thanks to my on-the-record email conversation with Kopp of Rutgers.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

For years, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, has claimed that human-caused climate change has accelerated sea level rise. But that claim is false. There is no scientific evidence of accelerated sea level rise since the mid-19th Century, and thus none showing human-created emissions caused an acceleration in recent decades. This does not mean that climate change isn’t happening. It is. It simply means that it has not caused the sea level to rise at a rate any higher than one would expect without human-caused climate change. Not only that, but the top scientists know this fact and have deliberately misrepresented it for years, deceiving the public. In September, I reported on one of the first global studies of sea level rise that used tide-gauge data, which is the only real-world data that goes back long enough, to the mid-19th Century, that would allow one to detect whether sea level rise had accelerated, decelerated, or remained steady. Since then, I exchanged over 50 emails with one of the world’s leading sea level rise scientists, Robert Kopp from Rutgers University, and heard back from IPCC, NASA, and NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. What I learned shocked me. For years, the world’s top scientists have known that they cannot prove there has been an acceleration of sea level rise, and yet they have told the public that they can. Not only that, in the process of this exchange, I gained a glimpse into how the scientists have been able to mislead journalists, policymakers, and the wider public for so long. You might think this is either old news or unimportant. Some climate scientists in years past have pointed out that the real-world data do not support claims of acceleration. And in recent years, a supposed increase in natural disasters from climate change has eclipsed sea level rise in terms of attention-grabbing headlines. But sea level rise has, since the 1990s, been the main justification for apocalyptic climate claims, and past efforts to debunk sea level rise have failed to show that scientists were deliberately misleading. The media and others have published terrifying maps of the future showing cities underwater. Accelerated sea level is one of the main justifications for predicting very high costs for adapting to climate change. And while good scientists have debunked acceleration claims in the past, they did not clearly show how IPCC scientists engaged in their manipulations. Not only can I prove that the real-world data do not support the claims that there has been an acceleration, I can show that the scientists deliberately misrepresented their research, and how they did it, thanks to my on-the-record email conversation with Kopp of Rutgers.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Michael Shellenberger

138,205 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Could heatwaves like this become the new normal? A new study has found the record-breaking temperatures seen across Europe would have been impossible without human-caused climate change. Scientists warn that, if global warming continues, heatwaves like this could happen as often as every other year. #heatwave #weather #climatechange

Could heatwaves like this become the new normal? A new study has found the record-breaking temperatures seen across Europe would have been impossible without human-caused climate change. Scientists warn that, if global warming continues, heatwaves like this could happen as often as every other year. #heatwave #weather #climatechange

Good Morning Britain

18,298 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A striking visualization of human-caused climate change - watch what happens in the Arctic... 🫠 Temperature anomalies by latitude band (zonal mean) from 1880 to 2022. Visualization produced by NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio at Data from POCRII at

A striking visualization of human-caused climate change - watch what happens in the Arctic... 🫠 Temperature anomalies by latitude band (zonal mean) from 1880 to 2022. Visualization produced by NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio at Data from POCRII at

Zack Labe

416,197 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Data from about 76,000 butterfly surveys conducted by various groups showed that their numbers dropped by 22% from 2000 to 2020 in the contiguous United States. Scientists attributed the decrease to habitat loss, pesticide use and climate change

Data from about 76,000 butterfly surveys conducted by various groups showed that their numbers dropped by 22% from 2000 to 2020 in the contiguous United States. Scientists attributed the decrease to habitat loss, pesticide use and climate change

Reuters

38,875 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Climate change is an existential threat to civilization and humankind, according to top scientists, journalists, and policymakers. They say that planetary warming caused by human emissions is making forest fires, hurricanes, and floods more frequent, worse, and more widespread; reducing arctic ice and submerging atoll islands; killing the coral on the Great Barrier Reef; worsening heatwaves and reducing crop yields. Former President Biden said climate change is “an existential threat to all of us,” and scientists and environmentalists say “one billion” to “billions” will die from food shortages and other climate impacts. But those claims are all nonsense. Climate change is real, but there was never any scientific evidence that it posed a threat to civilization and humankind. The area of Earth on fire has declined for decades, and what determines whether there are high-intensity fires is forest management and other forms of fire protection. There is no increase in hurricane frequency or intensity, and flood deaths and damages are determined by infrastructure and emergency preparedness. Nearly 90 percent of atoll islands have either increased in size or stayed the same in recent decades. Arctic ice did not decline from 2000 to 2024 and likely will not decline in the coming years. Coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at a 36-year high. Crop yields continue to climb, even with higher temperatures, aided in part by greater carbon dioxide. And heat waves were far worse in the 1930s, before significant human emissions, cold deaths outnumber heat deaths, and heat deaths are easily avoidable with access to air conditioning. The claims that billions will die and that climate change poses an existential risk are thus misinformation and, often, given that many scientists know they are lying, intentional disinformation. The best available evidence suggests nobody will die from climate change. None of this means we should not worry about climate change and humankind’s contribution to it. The evidence that human emissions change the climate is overwhelming, and many climate skeptics simply go too far in dismissing rising temperatures and humankind’s contribution. We have good temperature measures on land and oceans. We have known for over a century that the accumulation of carbon dioxide traps heat and that it has increased by 50 percent since the pre-industrial period, and the fact that it is a small amount of Earth’s atmosphere by volume does not erase its contribution to warming. And, all else being equal, we should not want any change to average global temperatures since humankind created agricultural, urban, and environmental systems to function within today’s moderate temperature band. But scientists, journalists, and activists have so wildly overstated the claims of climate change that they must at this point be considered lies, given their discrepancy with known scientific facts and highly visible realities. Sea levels have been rising since the mid-19th Century, and there is no scientific evidence that their rise has accelerated since emissions grew significantly after World War II, and the scientists who claim otherwise are manipulating their models to show acceleration when they can just as scientifically show deceleration. Given how clear the data are on climate change’s alleged impacts, the claims to the contrary by scientists, journalists, and activists cannot be attributed to ignorance. Moreover, there is strong evidence of deliberate deception. I recently documented how a top sea level rise scientist, Robert Kopp of Rutgers, engages in deception. The leading global organization that tracks disasters abruptly and inappropriately changed its methodology after climate expert Roger Pielke, Jr. showed that they had declined from 2000 to 2021. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration gave the false impression that disasters that cost over $1 billion were increasing and then abruptly ended its “Billion-Dollar Disasters Database” after Pielke showed how it had manipulated the numbers. Because the data clearly show that climate change is not an existential threat, scientists, politicians, and journalists have misrepresented practically every aspect of the issue. Carbon emissions are largely flat over the last decade and there is simply no conceivable way that humankind will produce high enough emissions to meet the wildly high “RCP 8.5” scenario upon which most of the alarmist predictions of future climate impacts show. What’s more, scientists know this perfectly well as Pielke and other scientists have documented abundant natural gas and slower than predicted economic growth and population growth will prevent it. “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely’” explained Pielke recently, “it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We showed this conclusively” in recent studies. And yet scientists continue to use the alarmist RCP 8.5 model for the simple fact that the other models simply aren’t alarmist enough. Why have scientists, politicians, and journalists repeated false and often apocalyptic claims for so long? And how were they able to get away with it? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Climate change is an existential threat to civilization and humankind, according to top scientists, journalists, and policymakers. They say that planetary warming caused by human emissions is making forest fires, hurricanes, and floods more frequent, worse, and more widespread; reducing arctic ice and submerging atoll islands; killing the coral on the Great Barrier Reef; worsening heatwaves and reducing crop yields. Former President Biden said climate change is “an existential threat to all of us,” and scientists and environmentalists say “one billion” to “billions” will die from food shortages and other climate impacts. But those claims are all nonsense. Climate change is real, but there was never any scientific evidence that it posed a threat to civilization and humankind. The area of Earth on fire has declined for decades, and what determines whether there are high-intensity fires is forest management and other forms of fire protection. There is no increase in hurricane frequency or intensity, and flood deaths and damages are determined by infrastructure and emergency preparedness. Nearly 90 percent of atoll islands have either increased in size or stayed the same in recent decades. Arctic ice did not decline from 2000 to 2024 and likely will not decline in the coming years. Coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at a 36-year high. Crop yields continue to climb, even with higher temperatures, aided in part by greater carbon dioxide. And heat waves were far worse in the 1930s, before significant human emissions, cold deaths outnumber heat deaths, and heat deaths are easily avoidable with access to air conditioning. The claims that billions will die and that climate change poses an existential risk are thus misinformation and, often, given that many scientists know they are lying, intentional disinformation. The best available evidence suggests nobody will die from climate change. None of this means we should not worry about climate change and humankind’s contribution to it. The evidence that human emissions change the climate is overwhelming, and many climate skeptics simply go too far in dismissing rising temperatures and humankind’s contribution. We have good temperature measures on land and oceans. We have known for over a century that the accumulation of carbon dioxide traps heat and that it has increased by 50 percent since the pre-industrial period, and the fact that it is a small amount of Earth’s atmosphere by volume does not erase its contribution to warming. And, all else being equal, we should not want any change to average global temperatures since humankind created agricultural, urban, and environmental systems to function within today’s moderate temperature band. But scientists, journalists, and activists have so wildly overstated the claims of climate change that they must at this point be considered lies, given their discrepancy with known scientific facts and highly visible realities. Sea levels have been rising since the mid-19th Century, and there is no scientific evidence that their rise has accelerated since emissions grew significantly after World War II, and the scientists who claim otherwise are manipulating their models to show acceleration when they can just as scientifically show deceleration. Given how clear the data are on climate change’s alleged impacts, the claims to the contrary by scientists, journalists, and activists cannot be attributed to ignorance. Moreover, there is strong evidence of deliberate deception. I recently documented how a top sea level rise scientist, Robert Kopp of Rutgers, engages in deception. The leading global organization that tracks disasters abruptly and inappropriately changed its methodology after climate expert Roger Pielke, Jr. showed that they had declined from 2000 to 2021. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration gave the false impression that disasters that cost over $1 billion were increasing and then abruptly ended its “Billion-Dollar Disasters Database” after Pielke showed how it had manipulated the numbers. Because the data clearly show that climate change is not an existential threat, scientists, politicians, and journalists have misrepresented practically every aspect of the issue. Carbon emissions are largely flat over the last decade and there is simply no conceivable way that humankind will produce high enough emissions to meet the wildly high “RCP 8.5” scenario upon which most of the alarmist predictions of future climate impacts show. What’s more, scientists know this perfectly well as Pielke and other scientists have documented abundant natural gas and slower than predicted economic growth and population growth will prevent it. “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely’” explained Pielke recently, “it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We showed this conclusively” in recent studies. And yet scientists continue to use the alarmist RCP 8.5 model for the simple fact that the other models simply aren’t alarmist enough. Why have scientists, politicians, and journalists repeated false and often apocalyptic claims for so long? And how were they able to get away with it? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Michael Shellenberger

114,406 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

See news that Nepal has demanded compensation from China, US, India for the disaster claiming Climate Change caused it. But as you can see below, scientists (the Cambridge professor is a leading researcher on glaciers in the specific region) DO NOT yet know if climate change caused the collapse of this glacier. Scientists DO KNOW there was a rocky landslide beneath the glacier which may have been the reason for the glacier to be pulled and break. And what caused this rocky layer underneath to landslide? It could be anything from natural causes to manmade construction / blasting activity. We really can't say exactly yet. This climate change theory has been thrown around by all GLISCO media networks immediately since the collapse. Soon the climate change in Nepal will be blamed solely on India by propaganda and psyops too. And Indian projects in the Himalayas, especially tunneling and border road construction to counter China, halted using environmental groups and protests. While China will silently continue to build on its side. Tl;Dr The fact is nobody knows for sure if climate change caused this particular glacier to break and collapse, they do know there was a rocky landslide underneath the glacier. This flood is going to be used to disrupt India's development near the LAC selectively. Courtesy: Channel News Asia / YT for the two segments of the video spliced together.

See news that Nepal has demanded compensation from China, US, India for the disaster claiming Climate Change caused it. But as you can see below, scientists (the Cambridge professor is a leading researcher on glaciers in the specific region) DO NOT yet know if climate change caused the collapse of this glacier. Scientists DO KNOW there was a rocky landslide beneath the glacier which may have been the reason for the glacier to be pulled and break. And what caused this rocky layer underneath to landslide? It could be anything from natural causes to manmade construction / blasting activity. We really can't say exactly yet. This climate change theory has been thrown around by all GLISCO media networks immediately since the collapse. Soon the climate change in Nepal will be blamed solely on India by propaganda and psyops too. And Indian projects in the Himalayas, especially tunneling and border road construction to counter China, halted using environmental groups and protests. While China will silently continue to build on its side. Tl;Dr The fact is nobody knows for sure if climate change caused this particular glacier to break and collapse, they do know there was a rocky landslide underneath the glacier. This flood is going to be used to disrupt India's development near the LAC selectively. Courtesy: Channel News Asia / YT for the two segments of the video spliced together.

Aravind

258,050 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

NEW from NOAA SOS: This dataset shows the tsunami wave caused by the asteroid that hit Earth 66 million years ago. The wave was so impressive because the asteroid is estimated to have been 6+ miles (10+ km) in diameter! Want to learn more? #dataviz #Data

NEW from NOAA SOS: This dataset shows the tsunami wave caused by the asteroid that hit Earth 66 million years ago. The wave was so impressive because the asteroid is estimated to have been 6+ miles (10+ km) in diameter! Want to learn more? #dataviz #Data

NOAA Education

2,241,555 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Here’s the TRUTH: the climate disaster death rate has *declined* by 98% over the last century, even as carbon emissions have risen. The average person is 50X less likely to die of a climate-related cause than in 1920. Why? Fossil fuels. And 8x as many people die from cold temperatures as warm ones. The right answer to all temperature-related deaths is, again, more abundance of fossil fuels. These are inconvenient truths for the climate cult. The real emergency isn’t climate change, it’s the man-made disaster of climate change policies that threaten U.S. prosperity.

Here’s the TRUTH: the climate disaster death rate has declined by 98% over the last century, even as carbon emissions have risen. The average person is 50X less likely to die of a climate-related cause than in 1920. Why? Fossil fuels. And 8x as many people die from cold temperatures as warm ones. The right answer to all temperature-related deaths is, again, more abundance of fossil fuels. These are inconvenient truths for the climate cult. The real emergency isn’t climate change, it’s the man-made disaster of climate change policies that threaten U.S. prosperity.

Vivek Ramaswamy

3,240,667 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce