Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇨🇦 SCIENTISTS SETTLE IT: THE UNIVERSE DEFINITELY ISN'T THE MATRIX Canadian researchers just definitively answered whether we're living in a computer simulation: we're not, and it's mathematically impossible. UBC professor Dr. Mir Faizal and his team proved that reality operates on "non-algorithmic understanding" that no computer could ever simulate....

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

2,708,799 subscribers

76,024 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: UBC Okanagan Physicists just proved that the Universe isn’t a simulation after all and that we are all 100% real. UBC Okanagan mathematically demonstrated that the universe cannot be simulated, using Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, scientists found that reality requires “non-algorithmic understanding,” something no computation can replicate. This discovery disproves the simulation hypothesis and reveals that the universe’s foundations exist beyond any algorithmic system ‘and increases the likelihood of God being real.’
0:36

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: UBC Okanagan Physicists just proved that the Universe isn’t a simulation after all and that we are all 100% real. UBC Okanagan mathematically demonstrated that the universe cannot be simulated, using Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, scientists found that reality requires “non-algorithmic understanding,” something no computation can replicate. This discovery disproves the simulation hypothesis and reveals that the universe’s foundations exist beyond any algorithmic system ‘and increases the likelihood of God being real.’

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

479,853 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Elon Musk: "I believe in The God of Spinoza and our universe could be a simulation run to discover what happens." "I would agree that that God of the simulator or whatever... reveals himself through the physics." Musk told Lex Fridman that if advanced civilizations exist, they wouldn't run simulations where they already know the outcome. "The reason that these higher beings would hold a simulation is to see what happens. They don't know what happens, otherwise they wouldn't hold the simulation." He draws from SpaceX testing: Countless simulations are run, but only the valuable ones continue. This raises profound questions about reality, purpose, and what makes a universe worth sustaining.
2:04

Elon Musk: "I believe in The God of Spinoza and our universe could be a simulation run to discover what happens." "I would agree that that God of the simulator or whatever... reveals himself through the physics." Musk told Lex Fridman that if advanced civilizations exist, they wouldn't run simulations where they already know the outcome. "The reason that these higher beings would hold a simulation is to see what happens. They don't know what happens, otherwise they wouldn't hold the simulation." He draws from SpaceX testing: Countless simulations are run, but only the valuable ones continue. This raises profound questions about reality, purpose, and what makes a universe worth sustaining.

Interstellar

240,741 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ELON: WE ARE MORE THAN LIKELY LIVING IN A SIMULATION "Given that we're clearly on a trajectory to have games that are indistinguishable from reality, and those games could be played on any set-top box, or on a pc or whatever. And there would probably be, you know, billions of computers and set-top boxes - it would seem to follow that the odds that we're in base reality is one in billions." Source: Elon Musk
0:26

ELON: WE ARE MORE THAN LIKELY LIVING IN A SIMULATION "Given that we're clearly on a trajectory to have games that are indistinguishable from reality, and those games could be played on any set-top box, or on a pc or whatever. And there would probably be, you know, billions of computers and set-top boxes - it would seem to follow that the odds that we're in base reality is one in billions." Source: Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

145,256 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

David Icke in 2024: “They know that the body is a biological computer. It can be manipulated, as computers can be manipulated, to process information in a different way.” “One of the great manipulative techniques is to sell the idea of inevitability.” “We have this global cult, a global network of secret societies that is driving the direction of the human society, way beyond presidents.” “This reality is actually a simulation. It's a incredibly advanced version of virtual reality game.”
0:58

David Icke in 2024: “They know that the body is a biological computer. It can be manipulated, as computers can be manipulated, to process information in a different way.” “One of the great manipulative techniques is to sell the idea of inevitability.” “We have this global cult, a global network of secret societies that is driving the direction of the human society, way beyond presidents.” “This reality is actually a simulation. It's a incredibly advanced version of virtual reality game.”

Defiant Ghost

112,737 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

David Icke in 2024: “They know that the body is a biological computer. It can be manipulated, as computers can be manipulated, to process information in a different way.” “One of the great manipulative techniques is to sell the idea of inevitability.” “We have this global cult, a global network of secret societies that is driving the direction of the human society, way beyond presidents.” “This reality is actually a simulation. It's a incredibly advanced version of virtual reality game.”
1:03

David Icke in 2024: “They know that the body is a biological computer. It can be manipulated, as computers can be manipulated, to process information in a different way.” “One of the great manipulative techniques is to sell the idea of inevitability.” “We have this global cult, a global network of secret societies that is driving the direction of the human society, way beyond presidents.” “This reality is actually a simulation. It's a incredibly advanced version of virtual reality game.”

Shadow Intel

67,223 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...
1:50

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

19,252 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Joe Rogan flips the God debate on its head with shocking theory that 'we created him' | Chris Melore, Daily Mail Joe Rogan has come to a mind-bending conclusion about life, fearing that humanity has misinterpreted what reality is and we're actually in the process of creating God. While interviewing computer scientist Roman Yampolskiy on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, the men debated the possibility that reality is a giant simulation and humans are building a God-like supercomputer using artificial intelligence (AI). According to Rogan's theory, humanity has misinterpreted ancient prophecies regarding the second coming of Jesus Christ and Judgement Day, saying the creation of this AI super intelligence is the final chapter before our reality resets. 'This whole idea of Jesus coming back, well maybe it's real. Maybe we just completely misinterpreted these ancient scrolls and texts and what it really means is that we are going to give birth to this,' Rogan explained. Yampolskiy, an author and researcher in AI safety, added to Rogan's theory, suggesting that reality is just an ongoing cycle of Big Bangs - the explosion that kickstarted the universe - starting and restarting life over and over again. During the episode released on July 3, Rogan added that he feared God 'is actually created by human beings creating this infinitely intelligent thing that can essentially harness all of the available energy and power of the universe and create anything it wants.' Yampolskiy even contended that many of the religions around the world have one thing in common: 'What they all agree on is that there is [a] super intelligence which created a fake world.' In previous podcasts episodes this year, Rogan has repeatedly warned that AI was just years away from reaching a God-like state as more tech companies pour resources into its development. Rogan asked Yampolskiy if the physical world we see was created by God, then what existed before this all-powerful being created the human race. 'Ideas, just information,' the computer scientist replied during the podcast. 'Just God. God was bored And it was like, let's make some animals that can think and solve problems. And for what reason?' Rogan countered. That's when the podcast host theorized life was an ongoing simulation and people had the idea of God's return to Earth backwards, claiming that people would summon this powerful intelligence themselves through the creation of AI. The theory that all life exists within a computer simulation has been debated for decades, and it's even been entertained in blockbuster movies like 'The Matrix.' While Rogan suggested that deepfakes of Bigfoot, UFOs, and other impossible images could be proof we're living in a virtual reality, scientists have argued that there is more basic evidence that this world is not real. Melvin Vopson, an associate professor in physics at the University of Portsmouth, has argued that gravity may be a sign that we're all living in a virtual simulation. According to Vopson's new paper in AIP Advances, our universe is the 'ultimate computer' and gravity's pull on Earth and in outer space is the computer trying to keep its vast amount of data organized. As for who's running the simulation, Yampolskiy explained that one possibility is life as we know it could simply be a replay of past events being examined by the future human race. Rogan then asked Yampolskiy why an all-powerful AI would even bother creating a reality for our consciousnesses to exist in. Yampolskiy explained that it's impossible to know who is controlling this program, whether it's an alien intelligence, humans from the future, or an AI super intelligence has already been built and is running these simulations by itself. Therefore, it's also impossible to know why people would be needed in the virtual world, adding that he and Rogan could have had the same interview thousands of times and never knew it was happening. 'Is it entertainment? Is it scientific experimentation? Is it marketing? Maybe somebody managed to control them and [are] trying to figure out what Starbucks coffee sells best. And they need to run [an] earth-sized simulation to see what sells best,' Yampolskiy explained. 'Think about this decade... We're about to invent intelligence and virtual worlds, God-like inventions. We're here. There's a good chance that's not just random,' the AI researcher added, suggesting we're already stuck in a computer simulation. In any scenario, Rogan theorized that the end of the simulation was nearing as tech giants get closer to creating the all-knowing intelligence which has been foretold in many prophecies. Read more:
1:11

Joe Rogan flips the God debate on its head with shocking theory that 'we created him' | Chris Melore, Daily Mail Joe Rogan has come to a mind-bending conclusion about life, fearing that humanity has misinterpreted what reality is and we're actually in the process of creating God. While interviewing computer scientist Roman Yampolskiy on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, the men debated the possibility that reality is a giant simulation and humans are building a God-like supercomputer using artificial intelligence (AI). According to Rogan's theory, humanity has misinterpreted ancient prophecies regarding the second coming of Jesus Christ and Judgement Day, saying the creation of this AI super intelligence is the final chapter before our reality resets. 'This whole idea of Jesus coming back, well maybe it's real. Maybe we just completely misinterpreted these ancient scrolls and texts and what it really means is that we are going to give birth to this,' Rogan explained. Yampolskiy, an author and researcher in AI safety, added to Rogan's theory, suggesting that reality is just an ongoing cycle of Big Bangs - the explosion that kickstarted the universe - starting and restarting life over and over again. During the episode released on July 3, Rogan added that he feared God 'is actually created by human beings creating this infinitely intelligent thing that can essentially harness all of the available energy and power of the universe and create anything it wants.' Yampolskiy even contended that many of the religions around the world have one thing in common: 'What they all agree on is that there is [a] super intelligence which created a fake world.' In previous podcasts episodes this year, Rogan has repeatedly warned that AI was just years away from reaching a God-like state as more tech companies pour resources into its development. Rogan asked Yampolskiy if the physical world we see was created by God, then what existed before this all-powerful being created the human race. 'Ideas, just information,' the computer scientist replied during the podcast. 'Just God. God was bored And it was like, let's make some animals that can think and solve problems. And for what reason?' Rogan countered. That's when the podcast host theorized life was an ongoing simulation and people had the idea of God's return to Earth backwards, claiming that people would summon this powerful intelligence themselves through the creation of AI. The theory that all life exists within a computer simulation has been debated for decades, and it's even been entertained in blockbuster movies like 'The Matrix.' While Rogan suggested that deepfakes of Bigfoot, UFOs, and other impossible images could be proof we're living in a virtual reality, scientists have argued that there is more basic evidence that this world is not real. Melvin Vopson, an associate professor in physics at the University of Portsmouth, has argued that gravity may be a sign that we're all living in a virtual simulation. According to Vopson's new paper in AIP Advances, our universe is the 'ultimate computer' and gravity's pull on Earth and in outer space is the computer trying to keep its vast amount of data organized. As for who's running the simulation, Yampolskiy explained that one possibility is life as we know it could simply be a replay of past events being examined by the future human race. Rogan then asked Yampolskiy why an all-powerful AI would even bother creating a reality for our consciousnesses to exist in. Yampolskiy explained that it's impossible to know who is controlling this program, whether it's an alien intelligence, humans from the future, or an AI super intelligence has already been built and is running these simulations by itself. Therefore, it's also impossible to know why people would be needed in the virtual world, adding that he and Rogan could have had the same interview thousands of times and never knew it was happening. 'Is it entertainment? Is it scientific experimentation? Is it marketing? Maybe somebody managed to control them and [are] trying to figure out what Starbucks coffee sells best. And they need to run [an] earth-sized simulation to see what sells best,' Yampolskiy explained. 'Think about this decade... We're about to invent intelligence and virtual worlds, God-like inventions. We're here. There's a good chance that's not just random,' the AI researcher added, suggesting we're already stuck in a computer simulation. In any scenario, Rogan theorized that the end of the simulation was nearing as tech giants get closer to creating the all-knowing intelligence which has been foretold in many prophecies. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

392,573 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Billy Carson : "We are living in a Simulation" Quantum physics doesn’t lie. “We’re living in the shadow of a higher dimension.” Scientists created an 8th dimensional quasi-crystal… angled it just right… and it cast a SHADOW SPHERE. That sphere? OUR UNIVERSE. “The angle of a higher multidimensional quasi crystal potentially could be what has created this gigantic sphere we call our universe.” Mind officially blown. Do YOU believe we’re in a simulation? Is this interview on Shawn Ryan Show the proof we’ve been waiting for… or is reality even wilder? Reply with your theory 👇 What if we’re all just NPCs in someone else’s game?
1:03

🚨 Billy Carson : "We are living in a Simulation" Quantum physics doesn’t lie. “We’re living in the shadow of a higher dimension.” Scientists created an 8th dimensional quasi-crystal… angled it just right… and it cast a SHADOW SPHERE. That sphere? OUR UNIVERSE. “The angle of a higher multidimensional quasi crystal potentially could be what has created this gigantic sphere we call our universe.” Mind officially blown. Do YOU believe we’re in a simulation? Is this interview on Shawn Ryan Show the proof we’ve been waiting for… or is reality even wilder? Reply with your theory 👇 What if we’re all just NPCs in someone else’s game?

Interstellar

121,082 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

––Charlie Barnett: "Consciousness and the computability of it. It sounds like, or at least in the past, that you've implied that consciousness is computable. Some, like Roger Penrose, have argued the opposite, and he's argued that consciousness is non-computational, and he uses Gödel's incompleteness theorems to argue that the mind can see truths that a purely algorithmic system can't derive, and therefore the brain must be using some kind of non-computable process when it comes to consciousness, something beyond what machines can do. What would you say to a view like that? David Deutsch: Yet again, it is using an impossible conception of what knowledge is. So Penrose thinks that when we see a proof of a mathematical theorem, we are touching certainty, we are god-like entities when we're mathematicians. But that's not true. Our mathematical knowledge is conjectural, just like our knowledge of physics. It's even more removed from our senses, because it's not true that the interior of our brains and the interior of our thoughts is more accessible to us than the world we perceive through our senses, or the world that we perceive through our theories, the center of the sun. We know lots about the center of the sun, even though no one has ever perceived it, and perhaps no one ever will. So mathematical truths are based on conjecture. What Gödel showed is that there is no firm ground underneath mathematical theories either. There's no way of proving that the standards of proof that we currently use are perfectly rigorous. And there have been cases in history where they have shown not to be rigorous. I think Pernot, who was the first to axiomatize the principles of the natural numbers, his first attempt at that was wrong. And it's interesting that he did not say, well, I've axiomatized them, therefore there's nothing to them other than my axioms. No, he said, oh dear, my axioms don't correctly represent the real number, the natural numbers, so I have to change them. So he was grasping, conjecturing for a reality, an abstract reality, just like scientists try to grasp physical reality. So the same epistemology applies to mathematics as it does to science."
2:31

––Charlie Barnett: "Consciousness and the computability of it. It sounds like, or at least in the past, that you've implied that consciousness is computable. Some, like Roger Penrose, have argued the opposite, and he's argued that consciousness is non-computational, and he uses Gödel's incompleteness theorems to argue that the mind can see truths that a purely algorithmic system can't derive, and therefore the brain must be using some kind of non-computable process when it comes to consciousness, something beyond what machines can do. What would you say to a view like that? David Deutsch: Yet again, it is using an impossible conception of what knowledge is. So Penrose thinks that when we see a proof of a mathematical theorem, we are touching certainty, we are god-like entities when we're mathematicians. But that's not true. Our mathematical knowledge is conjectural, just like our knowledge of physics. It's even more removed from our senses, because it's not true that the interior of our brains and the interior of our thoughts is more accessible to us than the world we perceive through our senses, or the world that we perceive through our theories, the center of the sun. We know lots about the center of the sun, even though no one has ever perceived it, and perhaps no one ever will. So mathematical truths are based on conjecture. What Gödel showed is that there is no firm ground underneath mathematical theories either. There's no way of proving that the standards of proof that we currently use are perfectly rigorous. And there have been cases in history where they have shown not to be rigorous. I think Pernot, who was the first to axiomatize the principles of the natural numbers, his first attempt at that was wrong. And it's interesting that he did not say, well, I've axiomatized them, therefore there's nothing to them other than my axioms. No, he said, oh dear, my axioms don't correctly represent the real number, the natural numbers, so I have to change them. So he was grasping, conjecturing for a reality, an abstract reality, just like scientists try to grasp physical reality. So the same epistemology applies to mathematics as it does to science."

Deutsch Explains

13,826 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AGI before 2030 or after 2030? Sergey Brin: "Before." Demis Hassabis: "Just after." Sergey Brin laughed. "No pressure, Demis." "I can ask for it. He needs to deliver it." They spent 4 minutes answering rapid-fire questions: The first question was about the web. Alex: "What does the web look like in 10 years?" Sergey paused. "10 years, because of the rate of progress in AI, is so far beyond anything we can foresee." "Not just the web. I don't think we really know what the world looks like in 10 years." Demis agreed. "The web is going to change quite a lot if you think about an agent-first web." "It doesn't necessarily need to render things the way we do as humans using the web." "Things will be pretty different in a few years." They were asked about hiring. Alex: "Would you hire someone who used AI in their interview?" Demis: "Depends how they used it. Using today's models and tools, probably not. But it depends how they would use it, actually." Sergey: "I mean, I've never interviewed at all." The room laughed. Demis: "I haven't either, actually." Then they were asked about simulation theory. Demis had tweeted a video of AI generating a natural scene. The caption: "Nature to simulation at the press of a button. Does make you wonder." Headlines said he thinks we're in a simulation. His answer. "Not in the way that Nick Bostrom and people talk about." "I don't think this is some kind of game, even though I wrote a lot of games." "I do think that ultimately underlying physics is information theory. We're in a computational universe. But it's not just a straightforward simulation." "The fact that these systems are able to model real structures in nature is quite interesting and telling." "I've been thinking a lot about our work with AlphaGo and AlphaFold." "Maybe at some point I'll write up a scientific paper about what I think that really means in terms of what's actually going on here in reality." Sergey pushed further. "That argument applies recursively." "If we're in a simulation, then by the same argument, whatever beings are making the simulation are themselves in a simulation. For roughly the same reasons. And so on and so forth." "You're going to have to either accept that we're in an infinite stack of simulations. Or that there's got to be some stopping criteria." Alex: "What's your best guess?" "I think we're taking a very anthropocentric view." "When we say simulation, we mean some kind of conscious being is running a simulation that we are then in. And that they have some kind of semblance of desire and consciousness that's similar to us." "That's where it kind of breaks down for me." "I just don't think that we're really equipped to reason about one level up in the hierarchy."
4:08

AGI before 2030 or after 2030? Sergey Brin: "Before." Demis Hassabis: "Just after." Sergey Brin laughed. "No pressure, Demis." "I can ask for it. He needs to deliver it." They spent 4 minutes answering rapid-fire questions: The first question was about the web. Alex: "What does the web look like in 10 years?" Sergey paused. "10 years, because of the rate of progress in AI, is so far beyond anything we can foresee." "Not just the web. I don't think we really know what the world looks like in 10 years." Demis agreed. "The web is going to change quite a lot if you think about an agent-first web." "It doesn't necessarily need to render things the way we do as humans using the web." "Things will be pretty different in a few years." They were asked about hiring. Alex: "Would you hire someone who used AI in their interview?" Demis: "Depends how they used it. Using today's models and tools, probably not. But it depends how they would use it, actually." Sergey: "I mean, I've never interviewed at all." The room laughed. Demis: "I haven't either, actually." Then they were asked about simulation theory. Demis had tweeted a video of AI generating a natural scene. The caption: "Nature to simulation at the press of a button. Does make you wonder." Headlines said he thinks we're in a simulation. His answer. "Not in the way that Nick Bostrom and people talk about." "I don't think this is some kind of game, even though I wrote a lot of games." "I do think that ultimately underlying physics is information theory. We're in a computational universe. But it's not just a straightforward simulation." "The fact that these systems are able to model real structures in nature is quite interesting and telling." "I've been thinking a lot about our work with AlphaGo and AlphaFold." "Maybe at some point I'll write up a scientific paper about what I think that really means in terms of what's actually going on here in reality." Sergey pushed further. "That argument applies recursively." "If we're in a simulation, then by the same argument, whatever beings are making the simulation are themselves in a simulation. For roughly the same reasons. And so on and so forth." "You're going to have to either accept that we're in an infinite stack of simulations. Or that there's got to be some stopping criteria." Alex: "What's your best guess?" "I think we're taking a very anthropocentric view." "When we say simulation, we mean some kind of conscious being is running a simulation that we are then in. And that they have some kind of semblance of desire and consciousness that's similar to us." "That's where it kind of breaks down for me." "I just don't think that we're really equipped to reason about one level up in the hierarchy."

Jaynit

100,360 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Robert Edward Grant on Simulation Theory: "We don't manifest our future - We just remember the path we chose." 😱 "We live in a spiritual life simulation in the form of a dream" At the heart of reality lies hidden mathematical code of sacred geometry, fractals, and patterns echoing through da Vinci, ancient Egypt, and beyond. "Is Reality a Simulation?" Grant explores how math serves as the source code of existence, with consciousness tuning into a non local field like a radio. Thoughts aren't confined to the brain, and what we perceive as solid matter may be rendered reality. "Nothing's ever hidden so that it'll never be found." This mind bending discussion fuses science, spirituality, and ancient wisdom, showing we're on the edge of awakening to the true architecture of our world. What if becoming lucid in the simulation changes everything?
1:39

Robert Edward Grant on Simulation Theory: "We don't manifest our future - We just remember the path we chose." 😱 "We live in a spiritual life simulation in the form of a dream" At the heart of reality lies hidden mathematical code of sacred geometry, fractals, and patterns echoing through da Vinci, ancient Egypt, and beyond. "Is Reality a Simulation?" Grant explores how math serves as the source code of existence, with consciousness tuning into a non local field like a radio. Thoughts aren't confined to the brain, and what we perceive as solid matter may be rendered reality. "Nothing's ever hidden so that it'll never be found." This mind bending discussion fuses science, spirituality, and ancient wisdom, showing we're on the edge of awakening to the true architecture of our world. What if becoming lucid in the simulation changes everything?

Interstellar

37,787 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk: "There's a very high probability we're living in a simulation." In a conversation with Nikhil Kamath, Musk explained how video games evolved from Pong to photorealistic worlds with millions of players in just 50 years. He noted that if this trend continues, games will soon be indistinguishable from reality with intelligent characters. "So then what are the odds that we are in base reality? And that this has not happened before." Musk added that we should think of this as probabilities, not certainties, and shared his theory that "The most interesting outcome is the most likely outcome as seen by a third party, the gods of the simulation."
2:34

Elon Musk: "There's a very high probability we're living in a simulation." In a conversation with Nikhil Kamath, Musk explained how video games evolved from Pong to photorealistic worlds with millions of players in just 50 years. He noted that if this trend continues, games will soon be indistinguishable from reality with intelligent characters. "So then what are the odds that we are in base reality? And that this has not happened before." Musk added that we should think of this as probabilities, not certainties, and shared his theory that "The most interesting outcome is the most likely outcome as seen by a third party, the gods of the simulation."

Interstellar

47,288 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨Dan Farah: The Genie Is Out Of The Bottle Dan states that he receiving messages from senior senators and people in the administration saying that the the doors just been blown open and the government doesn't have any choice but to walk through it in some in some regard. Dan also says: "I think it's only a matter of time before we see a sitting president step to the microphone and tell the world we're not alone in the universe. He also goes on to say that he I doesn't think we're too far off from that point. #ufotwitter #uapX #Disclosure #AgeOfDisclosure Source:
0:52

🚨Dan Farah: The Genie Is Out Of The Bottle Dan states that he receiving messages from senior senators and people in the administration saying that the the doors just been blown open and the government doesn't have any choice but to walk through it in some in some regard. Dan also says: "I think it's only a matter of time before we see a sitting president step to the microphone and tell the world we're not alone in the universe. He also goes on to say that he I doesn't think we're too far off from that point. #ufotwitter #uapX #Disclosure #AgeOfDisclosure Source:

Skywatch Signal

185,596 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Jim Clark called both NVIDIA and the internet before either existed: "Everything we sell today for $50,000 is going on a chip, on a card, on a PC, and it's going to cost $300. Either we're the company that makes that, or we get destroyed." "The function of the computer is no longer going to be mainly what just the computer does. It's going to be the fact that it can talk to all the other computers." Both predictions proved exactly right. The CEO said we'll deal with it in the future. Jim said by the time the future arrives, it's going to be too late. So he left and built the next company.
2:56

Jim Clark called both NVIDIA and the internet before either existed: "Everything we sell today for $50,000 is going on a chip, on a card, on a PC, and it's going to cost $300. Either we're the company that makes that, or we get destroyed." "The function of the computer is no longer going to be mainly what just the computer does. It's going to be the fact that it can talk to all the other computers." Both predictions proved exactly right. The CEO said we'll deal with it in the future. Jim said by the time the future arrives, it's going to be too late. So he left and built the next company.

David Senra

61,879 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🤯 IN 1983 — 16 YEARS BEFORE THE MATRIX — THE CIA OFFICIALLY PROVED THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION This is Figure B from the declassified CIA Gateway Experience report (1983). It shows the “Cosmic Egg”: • A Black Hole and White Hole connected at the center • The Nucleus is a Hologram • Reality is not solid matter… it’s a vibrating energy field The report states that the universe is an incredibly complex hologram. And more importantly — Page 25 (hidden for decades) explains exactly how human consciousness can control and reshape this simulation through a process called “Patterning”. They knew the truth 16 years before Hollywood told us in The Matrix. The answers have always been inside. Are you ready to see what they tried to hide for 40 years? IN 1983, THE CIA OFFICIALLY DOCUMENTED THAT THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION. THIS HAPPENED 16 YEARS BEFORE THE RELEASE OF THE MATRIX. PAGE 25, WHICH EXPLAINS HOW TO CONTROL IT, WAS HIDDEN FOR DECADES. THE ANSWERS ARE INSIDE.
0:30

🤯 IN 1983 — 16 YEARS BEFORE THE MATRIX — THE CIA OFFICIALLY PROVED THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION This is Figure B from the declassified CIA Gateway Experience report (1983). It shows the “Cosmic Egg”: • A Black Hole and White Hole connected at the center • The Nucleus is a Hologram • Reality is not solid matter… it’s a vibrating energy field The report states that the universe is an incredibly complex hologram. And more importantly — Page 25 (hidden for decades) explains exactly how human consciousness can control and reshape this simulation through a process called “Patterning”. They knew the truth 16 years before Hollywood told us in The Matrix. The answers have always been inside. Are you ready to see what they tried to hide for 40 years? IN 1983, THE CIA OFFICIALLY DOCUMENTED THAT THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION. THIS HAPPENED 16 YEARS BEFORE THE RELEASE OF THE MATRIX. PAGE 25, WHICH EXPLAINS HOW TO CONTROL IT, WAS HIDDEN FOR DECADES. THE ANSWERS ARE INSIDE.

Philippe T

12,839 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 Linda Moulton Howe: "We are living in a Computer Simulated Universe" Physicist Jim Gates found ERROR-CORRECTING CODES in quarks & leptons... exactly like the ones running our computers on Earth! "A 2017 paper [gives] substantial evidence" we're in a HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE. "The projector cannot be in the same room with the holograms. Mathematically, it does not work... It's being projected by something you do not see... Like magic." This is the Simulation Theory clip from their mind-blowing Gaia interview. The great awakening is accelerating in 2026. "The odds are billions to one that we are in what is called a base universe, meaning natural evolution." - Elon Musk What "glitches" have YOU personally experienced in reality? Mandela effects? Déjà vu on steroids? Time slips? Do you buy the holographic projector theory — are we just light projections from another dimension? Is this why UFOs/NHI seem to bend physics? Drop your wildest simulation stories or theories below 👇
4:10

🚨 Linda Moulton Howe: "We are living in a Computer Simulated Universe" Physicist Jim Gates found ERROR-CORRECTING CODES in quarks & leptons... exactly like the ones running our computers on Earth! "A 2017 paper [gives] substantial evidence" we're in a HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE. "The projector cannot be in the same room with the holograms. Mathematically, it does not work... It's being projected by something you do not see... Like magic." This is the Simulation Theory clip from their mind-blowing Gaia interview. The great awakening is accelerating in 2026. "The odds are billions to one that we are in what is called a base universe, meaning natural evolution." - Elon Musk What "glitches" have YOU personally experienced in reality? Mandela effects? Déjà vu on steroids? Time slips? Do you buy the holographic projector theory — are we just light projections from another dimension? Is this why UFOs/NHI seem to bend physics? Drop your wildest simulation stories or theories below 👇

Interstellar

42,942 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon Musk: Boring simulations will be terminated. “I have a theory here that if the simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like on this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. Arguably the most important thing is to keep things interesting enough so that everyone paying the bills on some cosmic AWS are they going to pay their cosmic AWS bill or whatever the equivalent is that we're running in. And as long as we're interesting, they'll keep paying the bills.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026
0:36

Elon Musk: Boring simulations will be terminated. “I have a theory here that if the simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like on this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. Arguably the most important thing is to keep things interesting enough so that everyone paying the bills on some cosmic AWS are they going to pay their cosmic AWS bill or whatever the equivalent is that we're running in. And as long as we're interesting, they'll keep paying the bills.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026

ELON CLIPS

21,944 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”
1:44

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

David Senra

12,759 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Marc Andreessen's (Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸) mentor Jim Clark predicted NVIDIA and the internet before either existed: "Everything we sell today for $50,000 is going on a chip, on a card, on a PC, and it's going to cost $300. Either we're the company that makes that, or we get destroyed." "The function of the computer is no longer going to be mainly what just the computer does. It's going to be the fact that it can talk to all the other computers." "Both predictions proved exactly right. The CEO said we'll deal with it in the future. Jim said by the time the future arrives, it's going to be too late. So he left and built the next company."
2:56

Marc Andreessen's (Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸) mentor Jim Clark predicted NVIDIA and the internet before either existed: "Everything we sell today for $50,000 is going on a chip, on a card, on a PC, and it's going to cost $300. Either we're the company that makes that, or we get destroyed." "The function of the computer is no longer going to be mainly what just the computer does. It's going to be the fact that it can talk to all the other computers." "Both predictions proved exactly right. The CEO said we'll deal with it in the future. Jim said by the time the future arrives, it's going to be too late. So he left and built the next company."

David Senra

49,433 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten