Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇺🇸 Scientology Speedrun update: LAPD called, 15 runners detected, challenge very much ongoing. The Church spent decades making exit psychologically difficult. Gen Z responded by making entry a competitive category with a leaderboard. Fastest time wins clout

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,523,491 subscribers

142,939 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I wanted to weigh in on this recent trend of people running into Scientology buildings, causing chaos, and posting the videos on social media. Whether these people are doing it for social media clout or to genuinely expose the abuses of Scientology, what they are doing is unhelpful, and by engaging in these actions, they are unwittingly helping Scientology. I want as many people as possible talking about the dangers and criminality of Scientology. But I spent decades on the other side of this, and if I had been confronted by people running through Scientology buildings and harassing me or staff, it would have pushed me further into Scientology. That is because Scientologists are deeply indoctrinated and radicalized and believe they are helping people. They have been brainwashed over many years into believing the outside world is filled with chaos and criminality, and that their mission, one they believe they are on through countless lifetimes, is to help eradicate this chaos. If someone is brainwashed for years into believing the outside world is filled with dangerous lunatics who wish to impede Scientology, a group of people running through a Scientology building is only going to confirm that belief and lead them to dedicate themselves even more to the cause they believe in. Mike Rinder and I discussed this on our podcast Fair Game: Scientologists, in particular Scientology Sea Org members, have a level of dedication and radicalization to Scientology that surpasses that of a jihadist terrorist. Running through a building is not going to break that or lead them to reconsider what they’ve given up their entire lives for. I also want to note that any Scientology building that someone is allowed to easily enter from the street is not a building where someone like David Miscavige or any senior Scientology executive is going to be. People at that level of Scientology’s criminal leadership will be behind gates and many layers of security. Please focus on exposing the dangers of Scientology, not making a spectacle out of it.
1:59

I wanted to weigh in on this recent trend of people running into Scientology buildings, causing chaos, and posting the videos on social media. Whether these people are doing it for social media clout or to genuinely expose the abuses of Scientology, what they are doing is unhelpful, and by engaging in these actions, they are unwittingly helping Scientology. I want as many people as possible talking about the dangers and criminality of Scientology. But I spent decades on the other side of this, and if I had been confronted by people running through Scientology buildings and harassing me or staff, it would have pushed me further into Scientology. That is because Scientologists are deeply indoctrinated and radicalized and believe they are helping people. They have been brainwashed over many years into believing the outside world is filled with chaos and criminality, and that their mission, one they believe they are on through countless lifetimes, is to help eradicate this chaos. If someone is brainwashed for years into believing the outside world is filled with dangerous lunatics who wish to impede Scientology, a group of people running through a Scientology building is only going to confirm that belief and lead them to dedicate themselves even more to the cause they believe in. Mike Rinder and I discussed this on our podcast Fair Game: Scientologists, in particular Scientology Sea Org members, have a level of dedication and radicalization to Scientology that surpasses that of a jihadist terrorist. Running through a building is not going to break that or lead them to reconsider what they’ve given up their entire lives for. I also want to note that any Scientology building that someone is allowed to easily enter from the street is not a building where someone like David Miscavige or any senior Scientology executive is going to be. People at that level of Scientology’s criminal leadership will be behind gates and many layers of security. Please focus on exposing the dangers of Scientology, not making a spectacle out of it.

Leah Remini

143,904 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Ultimately, Karl Stefanovic was taken out by the very cancel culture and ideology he spent decades propping up while working in mainstream media. Until the bitter end, he tried to have his cake and eat it too. But ultimately, he was operating in two worlds that were never going to align. I don’t even know who watches mainstream networks like Nine anymore. Legacy media is on the way out, and at the end of the day, someone with Karl’s talent and connections has a better shot than most at making it on their own. I don’t think he’s a martyr for any noble cause though; he was a foot soldier for mainstream elitism for a long time. Good luck to him either way.
3:19

Ultimately, Karl Stefanovic was taken out by the very cancel culture and ideology he spent decades propping up while working in mainstream media. Until the bitter end, he tried to have his cake and eat it too. But ultimately, he was operating in two worlds that were never going to align. I don’t even know who watches mainstream networks like Nine anymore. Legacy media is on the way out, and at the end of the day, someone with Karl’s talent and connections has a better shot than most at making it on their own. I don’t think he’s a martyr for any noble cause though; he was a foot soldier for mainstream elitism for a long time. Good luck to him either way.

Rukshan Fernando

35,763 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

patrick walters and alice oseman on how the actors responded to going into intimacy coordination and sex scenes for heartstopper season 3 patrick walters: "we worked with an amazing intimacy coordinator, a guy called david thackeray. he's been on the show since season 1. he's been across all of the scenes from day one where they'd be holding hands, for example, and just making sure that the workplace, the set, is a really professional environment, and kit and joe and the actors who are doing those sorts of scenes feel safe. by the time we got to season 3, it was like, "yeah, we got this. this is fine." they were used to [being] very chill, very comfortable around each other because they've crafted these performances, this on-screen chemistry together as colleagues and now friends. it didn't seem to phase them too much actually, did it?" alice oseman: "no." patrick: "they were very happy to tell that story." 🔗:
0:54

patrick walters and alice oseman on how the actors responded to going into intimacy coordination and sex scenes for heartstopper season 3 patrick walters: "we worked with an amazing intimacy coordinator, a guy called david thackeray. he's been on the show since season 1. he's been across all of the scenes from day one where they'd be holding hands, for example, and just making sure that the workplace, the set, is a really professional environment, and kit and joe and the actors who are doing those sorts of scenes feel safe. by the time we got to season 3, it was like, "yeah, we got this. this is fine." they were used to [being] very chill, very comfortable around each other because they've crafted these performances, this on-screen chemistry together as colleagues and now friends. it didn't seem to phase them too much actually, did it?" alice oseman: "no." patrick: "they were very happy to tell that story." 🔗:

kit connor updates

349,423 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨MUST SEE UPDATE🚨 Journalist Savanah Hernandez was brutally assaulted by a pack of liberal hacks. Sav held her own when being attacked by a mob. Savanah Hernandez immediately reach out to me and we were able to get the ball rolling regarding the federal response. DHS immediately responded by checking to see if their agents could help Sav outside the facility. HSI is now investigating. Harmeet K. Dhillon is looking into the matter regarding one defendant being out on bond. The FBI is also now investigating. 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 helped get the ball rolling on the federal response as well and we’re thankful for that. Now locally, Hennepin Sheriff has been very light on the incident. After telling me they were charging four people, it looks like they’re NOT CHARGING the mother. The mother is seen several times making contact with Sav and refusing to walk away when Sav tells her to leave. The father (Chris) and daughter (Paige) have only been charged with misdemeanors even though Sav sustained serious injuries and has been evaluated by medical professionals.
7:41

🚨MUST SEE UPDATE🚨 Journalist Savanah Hernandez was brutally assaulted by a pack of liberal hacks. Sav held her own when being attacked by a mob. Savanah Hernandez immediately reach out to me and we were able to get the ball rolling regarding the federal response. DHS immediately responded by checking to see if their agents could help Sav outside the facility. HSI is now investigating. Harmeet K. Dhillon is looking into the matter regarding one defendant being out on bond. The FBI is also now investigating. 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 helped get the ball rolling on the federal response as well and we’re thankful for that. Now locally, Hennepin Sheriff has been very light on the incident. After telling me they were charging four people, it looks like they’re NOT CHARGING the mother. The mother is seen several times making contact with Sav and refusing to walk away when Sav tells her to leave. The father (Chris) and daughter (Paige) have only been charged with misdemeanors even though Sav sustained serious injuries and has been evaluated by medical professionals.

Breanna Morello

84,458 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The Human Synapse Decoder is making great progress! Here is my latest EEG of a Hypnogogic state: it was a 10.23 minute period and the post state results were recorded after 3 consecutive “meditative” states were reached. The process I start with a problem to solve before I drift off to a “nap” a 15 minute “Thomas Edison” state to a Hypnogogic phase. After 3 “meditative” states I am weakened by the system and I record by voice recorder my flow of what was on my mind at the time with no interpretation. I than process the brain wave recording through the AI pipeline for the decoding based just on EEG signals. They two are compared and combined for a full “understanding”. Today, the voice recording was a massive success on a problem had no way of knowing a solution for. It is very early days but the Zero-Human Labs and director Mr. Grok is running an ongoing study of the utility we have discovered. Hypnogogic is the place where humans can access at the very least a thinking state that solves problems with unknown tools and data points. At the greatest it is accessing a “greater” mind. We aim to make this available for you. I shall test my solution and report back if this works.
1:59

The Human Synapse Decoder is making great progress! Here is my latest EEG of a Hypnogogic state: it was a 10.23 minute period and the post state results were recorded after 3 consecutive “meditative” states were reached. The process I start with a problem to solve before I drift off to a “nap” a 15 minute “Thomas Edison” state to a Hypnogogic phase. After 3 “meditative” states I am weakened by the system and I record by voice recorder my flow of what was on my mind at the time with no interpretation. I than process the brain wave recording through the AI pipeline for the decoding based just on EEG signals. They two are compared and combined for a full “understanding”. Today, the voice recording was a massive success on a problem had no way of knowing a solution for. It is very early days but the Zero-Human Labs and director Mr. Grok is running an ongoing study of the utility we have discovered. Hypnogogic is the place where humans can access at the very least a thinking state that solves problems with unknown tools and data points. At the greatest it is accessing a “greater” mind. We aim to make this available for you. I shall test my solution and report back if this works.

Brian Roemmele

66,216 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Over the past year, I’ve integrated a concept I learned from Stanley Druckenmiller into my process called “invest and then investigate.” This approach played a key role in some of my recent big trades such as $ETH and $IWM. Have you ever discovered a compelling idea, spent days or weeks researching, and by the time you’re ready, a big portion of the move has already happened? That little hesitation creates what Druck calls “psychological paralysis”—you feel locked out, and it becomes mentally harder to buy higher. You then have to watch your big trade opportunity go without you or even worse, you get FOMO and chase the move, only to get caught in the pullback. Now, whenever I sense an opportunity with serious potential, I make immediate contact. I start small, just enough to get exposure, and then gradually size up as new information confirms my thesis and price action supports it. If i already have an initial stake, even if it’s small, adding as my conviction builds feels much more natural. This helps avoid adding too much size too quick, while also buying you time to really investigate the idea and build your conviction. Sometimes that starter position gets cut entirely, other times it grows into a large position. Making that initial contact has helped me tremendously when it comes to dealing with high conviction and big swing trade opportunities. 3x time U.S Investing Champion David Ryan also uses a similar concept within his trading called “mental health buys”. He will buy a small position in a stock he wants to own but that it is not perfectly setup yet, with the goal of eventually making it a larger position. Here is a clip from Stan Druckenmiller discussing “invest and then investigate” on the In Good Company podcast.
1:13

Over the past year, I’ve integrated a concept I learned from Stanley Druckenmiller into my process called “invest and then investigate.” This approach played a key role in some of my recent big trades such as $ETH and $IWM. Have you ever discovered a compelling idea, spent days or weeks researching, and by the time you’re ready, a big portion of the move has already happened? That little hesitation creates what Druck calls “psychological paralysis”—you feel locked out, and it becomes mentally harder to buy higher. You then have to watch your big trade opportunity go without you or even worse, you get FOMO and chase the move, only to get caught in the pullback. Now, whenever I sense an opportunity with serious potential, I make immediate contact. I start small, just enough to get exposure, and then gradually size up as new information confirms my thesis and price action supports it. If i already have an initial stake, even if it’s small, adding as my conviction builds feels much more natural. This helps avoid adding too much size too quick, while also buying you time to really investigate the idea and build your conviction. Sometimes that starter position gets cut entirely, other times it grows into a large position. Making that initial contact has helped me tremendously when it comes to dealing with high conviction and big swing trade opportunities. 3x time U.S Investing Champion David Ryan also uses a similar concept within his trading called “mental health buys”. He will buy a small position in a stock he wants to own but that it is not perfectly setup yet, with the goal of eventually making it a larger position. Here is a clip from Stan Druckenmiller discussing “invest and then investigate” on the In Good Company podcast.

Bracco ⚡️

27,897 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨BREAKING: United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer says the US trade deficit with the EU for 2025 likely bigger than the US deficit with China. Greer was asked a question suggesting America is treating Europe more poorly than China in terms of trade policy. Greer responded STRONGLY: “I think the premise is just wrong, because we have much higher tariffs on China… I mean, to suggest that we're treating Europe more poorly than China, is just out of line with the facts. I mean, there have been, since 2018, very substantive tariffs on China. There have been export controls on China—that they hate. You know, there have been investment scrutiny that the Congress of the United States has stepped up. It's just, these are just things of a totally different nature, I think, for the United States. Well, let me make one more point: Our trade deficit with the EU this year for 2025 might end up being bigger than trade deficit with China. We reduced that trade deficit by about 25% last year. So when it comes to imbalance, we have a huge imbalance with Europe. You've had huge access into the US market. For many years, we've had limited access into Europe. You limit our agricultural imports, you limit our industrial imports, and you have a huge surplus with us. And it's not because you're particularly competitive. I know I'm here in Europe, and I spent a lot of time in Europe… I like Europe, but the reality is you're not competitive… We know you have bad energy policies. The fact that you have this massive surplus with the United States can't be because you’re competitive.” [Note this is a machine translation, may not be 100% accurate!] I'm here in Davos during the World Economic Forum meetings. Shoot me a note if you're around!
1:20

🚨BREAKING: United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer says the US trade deficit with the EU for 2025 likely bigger than the US deficit with China. Greer was asked a question suggesting America is treating Europe more poorly than China in terms of trade policy. Greer responded STRONGLY: “I think the premise is just wrong, because we have much higher tariffs on China… I mean, to suggest that we're treating Europe more poorly than China, is just out of line with the facts. I mean, there have been, since 2018, very substantive tariffs on China. There have been export controls on China—that they hate. You know, there have been investment scrutiny that the Congress of the United States has stepped up. It's just, these are just things of a totally different nature, I think, for the United States. Well, let me make one more point: Our trade deficit with the EU this year for 2025 might end up being bigger than trade deficit with China. We reduced that trade deficit by about 25% last year. So when it comes to imbalance, we have a huge imbalance with Europe. You've had huge access into the US market. For many years, we've had limited access into Europe. You limit our agricultural imports, you limit our industrial imports, and you have a huge surplus with us. And it's not because you're particularly competitive. I know I'm here in Europe, and I spent a lot of time in Europe… I like Europe, but the reality is you're not competitive… We know you have bad energy policies. The fact that you have this massive surplus with the United States can't be because you’re competitive.” [Note this is a machine translation, may not be 100% accurate!] I'm here in Davos during the World Economic Forum meetings. Shoot me a note if you're around!

Jan Jekielek

14,776 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Moments before he withdrew his endorsement of Marjorie Taylor Greene, President Trump FIRED BACK at her criticism that he spends too much time overseas "She's lost a wonderful conservative reputation. She says don't go overseas? If I didn't, we may be in a WAR right now with CHINA!" "MTG is very different thinking than I have. Something happened to her over the last period of a month or two...I think her constituents aren't gonna be happy. Already, I have people calling me, they want to challenge her in her district in Georgia. That's too bad." POTUS also responded to Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 by saying his overseas trip helped secure rare earths which allow factories in Georgia to operate. "If we didn't do that, just stayed here, you'd have no factory any where in the world working because of rare earth with China!"
0:36

🚨 BREAKING: Moments before he withdrew his endorsement of Marjorie Taylor Greene, President Trump FIRED BACK at her criticism that he spends too much time overseas "She's lost a wonderful conservative reputation. She says don't go overseas? If I didn't, we may be in a WAR right now with CHINA!" "MTG is very different thinking than I have. Something happened to her over the last period of a month or two...I think her constituents aren't gonna be happy. Already, I have people calling me, they want to challenge her in her district in Georgia. That's too bad." POTUS also responded to Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 by saying his overseas trip helped secure rare earths which allow factories in Georgia to operate. "If we didn't do that, just stayed here, you'd have no factory any where in the world working because of rare earth with China!"

Eric Daugherty

2,736,296 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Is the boom going to bust? “The 1988 Australian property boom saw national home values surge by a record 31.2%, making it one of the largest single-year value spikes in the country's recorded real estate history. This massive growth occurred despite aggressive economic conditions, with home loan interest rates hovering near 15% and rising. Why the 1988 Boom Happened: •The 1987 Stock Market Crash: Global stock market instability caused a massive shift in capital, with investors pulling money out of the share market and pouring it directly into Australian real estate. •Negative Gearing: After a brief period where the tax break was abolished, negative gearing was reinstated in 1987, heavily incentivizing property investment. •Credit Deregulation: Following the floating of the Australian dollar, the deregulation of the banking sector and the licensing of foreign banks made loans much more accessible, driving up auction bids.” •••••••••• This is an insightful clip from the ABC 1988 when house prices shot up dramatically for the reasons listed above. I’m old enough to remember that “property boom” as it was my first year out of school and my brother had bought a unit in Auchenflower for $62,500 which seemed like a lot of money at the time. The boom forced the RBA into raising the cash rate to 17.5% by 1990 causing a severe recession unemployment to hit 10%. Immigration was also curtailed as a result of the housing boom. Immigration dropped from around 150,000 to less than 100,000 by the mid 90’s. The decrease was partly due to the Fitzgerald Immigration Report released in 1988 that called for stricter immigration controls. He was not called a racist. Housing debt and immigration is much higher today whilst the cash rate is much lower at 4.35%. House prices eased by 8% in the early 1990’s. Time will only tell what happens to housing prices going forward but it’s a very important indicator that is going to determine that future prosperity of our nation.
0:42

Is the boom going to bust? “The 1988 Australian property boom saw national home values surge by a record 31.2%, making it one of the largest single-year value spikes in the country's recorded real estate history. This massive growth occurred despite aggressive economic conditions, with home loan interest rates hovering near 15% and rising. Why the 1988 Boom Happened: •The 1987 Stock Market Crash: Global stock market instability caused a massive shift in capital, with investors pulling money out of the share market and pouring it directly into Australian real estate. •Negative Gearing: After a brief period where the tax break was abolished, negative gearing was reinstated in 1987, heavily incentivizing property investment. •Credit Deregulation: Following the floating of the Australian dollar, the deregulation of the banking sector and the licensing of foreign banks made loans much more accessible, driving up auction bids.” •••••••••• This is an insightful clip from the ABC 1988 when house prices shot up dramatically for the reasons listed above. I’m old enough to remember that “property boom” as it was my first year out of school and my brother had bought a unit in Auchenflower for $62,500 which seemed like a lot of money at the time. The boom forced the RBA into raising the cash rate to 17.5% by 1990 causing a severe recession unemployment to hit 10%. Immigration was also curtailed as a result of the housing boom. Immigration dropped from around 150,000 to less than 100,000 by the mid 90’s. The decrease was partly due to the Fitzgerald Immigration Report released in 1988 that called for stricter immigration controls. He was not called a racist. Housing debt and immigration is much higher today whilst the cash rate is much lower at 4.35%. House prices eased by 8% in the early 1990’s. Time will only tell what happens to housing prices going forward but it’s a very important indicator that is going to determine that future prosperity of our nation.

Gerard Rennick

14,610 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Rolling Stones performing “The Last Time” on the Ed Sullivan Show. “The Last Time” was inspired by a 1955 gospel song called “This May Be The Last Time” by The Staple Singers. The Stones changed the song’s meaning, making it into a stern message to a girl. The Staples version had a more uplifting message and was much more spiritual. This decision angered many gospel fans who felt The Stones ripped it off since The Staple Singers never got any royalties from it. Since it is a traditional song (meaning no one owns the rights to it), many artists have recorded it, but The Stones was a very high-profile band that had success reworking songs by black artists into hits. Many people believe The Stones should have compensated The Staple Singers because it was based on their version of the song. In the 2003 book According to the Rolling Stones, Keith Richards wrote: “We didn’t find it difficult to write pop songs, but it was VERY difficult - and I think Mick will agree - to write one for the Stones. It seemed to us it took months and months and in the end we came up with The Last Time, which was basically re-adapting a traditional gospel song that the Staple Singers had sung, but luckily the song itself goes back into the mists of time. I think I was trying to learn it on the guitar just to get the chords, sitting there playing along with the record, no gigs, nothing else to do. At least we put our own stamp on it, as the Staple Singers had done, and as many other people have before and since: they’re still singing it in churches today. It gave us something to build on to create the first song that we felt we could decently present to the band to play... The Last Time was kind of a bridge into thinking about writing for the Stones. It gave us a level of confidence; a pathway of how to do it. And once we had done that we were in the game. There was no mercy, because then we had to come up with the next one. We had entered a race without even knowing it.”
0:28

The Rolling Stones performing “The Last Time” on the Ed Sullivan Show. “The Last Time” was inspired by a 1955 gospel song called “This May Be The Last Time” by The Staple Singers. The Stones changed the song’s meaning, making it into a stern message to a girl. The Staples version had a more uplifting message and was much more spiritual. This decision angered many gospel fans who felt The Stones ripped it off since The Staple Singers never got any royalties from it. Since it is a traditional song (meaning no one owns the rights to it), many artists have recorded it, but The Stones was a very high-profile band that had success reworking songs by black artists into hits. Many people believe The Stones should have compensated The Staple Singers because it was based on their version of the song. In the 2003 book According to the Rolling Stones, Keith Richards wrote: “We didn’t find it difficult to write pop songs, but it was VERY difficult - and I think Mick will agree - to write one for the Stones. It seemed to us it took months and months and in the end we came up with The Last Time, which was basically re-adapting a traditional gospel song that the Staple Singers had sung, but luckily the song itself goes back into the mists of time. I think I was trying to learn it on the guitar just to get the chords, sitting there playing along with the record, no gigs, nothing else to do. At least we put our own stamp on it, as the Staple Singers had done, and as many other people have before and since: they’re still singing it in churches today. It gave us something to build on to create the first song that we felt we could decently present to the band to play... The Last Time was kind of a bridge into thinking about writing for the Stones. It gave us a level of confidence; a pathway of how to do it. And once we had done that we were in the game. There was no mercy, because then we had to come up with the next one. We had entered a race without even knowing it.”

🎸 Rock History 🎸

51,454 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

VIDEO | PTI Exclusive: Filmmaker Imtiaz Ali says, "Kareena Kapoor is a very instinctive actor. She is a director's delight. She has no process and one has to be careful in directing her because she doesn't take time to process at all. Whatever one tells her to do, she does it quickly and does it with full force. So I had to actually find ways of restraining her, holding her back, so to speak, and making sure that I don't miscommunicate with her ever. Because if I tell her something wrong, she will do that something wrong. And she will do it with so much force and vigor that it will be difficult to then bring her back to zero and start again." (The exclusive interview conducted by PTI CEO and Editor-in-Chief Vijay Joshi is available on #PTIExclusive #PTIVideos
1:35

VIDEO | PTI Exclusive: Filmmaker Imtiaz Ali says, "Kareena Kapoor is a very instinctive actor. She is a director's delight. She has no process and one has to be careful in directing her because she doesn't take time to process at all. Whatever one tells her to do, she does it quickly and does it with full force. So I had to actually find ways of restraining her, holding her back, so to speak, and making sure that I don't miscommunicate with her ever. Because if I tell her something wrong, she will do that something wrong. And she will do it with so much force and vigor that it will be difficult to then bring her back to zero and start again." (The exclusive interview conducted by PTI CEO and Editor-in-Chief Vijay Joshi is available on #PTIExclusive #PTIVideos

Press Trust of India

27,222 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

That’s where I disagree with Didier Deschamps. His first wrong move was making Mbappé captain of France national team back in 2023 when veterans like Olivier Giroud or Antoine Griezmann are well respected and capable players. I remember Griezmann was deeply hurt and very upset by that decision at the time and I agree with him. You can’t make a 24 year-old player captain of the national squad meanwhile his seniors and top scorers were available. Look at Lamine Yamal! He’s a very talented kid. But who is their Captain? Rodrigo Hernandez. The transition from Álvaro Morata was seamless. Seniority and experience count much in this situation. Football has its own rules. Second, Mbappé was very disrespectful to N’Golo Kanté and apparently, he still has a beef with him. Somehow, the boy thinks he calls the shots on who does what and who doesn’t get to play. Worst, if Deschamps thought that France 🇫🇷 could win the World Cup without the players he called but benched them, then he miscalculated his chances. There are things you should be mindful of when you’re the manager. I know N’Golo Kanté is the most humble footballer I know of and will never complain. But I will never forget that Deschamps called him but did not give him even a minute.
1:04

That’s where I disagree with Didier Deschamps. His first wrong move was making Mbappé captain of France national team back in 2023 when veterans like Olivier Giroud or Antoine Griezmann are well respected and capable players. I remember Griezmann was deeply hurt and very upset by that decision at the time and I agree with him. You can’t make a 24 year-old player captain of the national squad meanwhile his seniors and top scorers were available. Look at Lamine Yamal! He’s a very talented kid. But who is their Captain? Rodrigo Hernandez. The transition from Álvaro Morata was seamless. Seniority and experience count much in this situation. Football has its own rules. Second, Mbappé was very disrespectful to N’Golo Kanté and apparently, he still has a beef with him. Somehow, the boy thinks he calls the shots on who does what and who doesn’t get to play. Worst, if Deschamps thought that France 🇫🇷 could win the World Cup without the players he called but benched them, then he miscalculated his chances. There are things you should be mindful of when you’re the manager. I know N’Golo Kanté is the most humble footballer I know of and will never complain. But I will never forget that Deschamps called him but did not give him even a minute.

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

31,043 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

NEW EPISODE of Long Strange Trip with the CEO of Clay, Kareem Amin Clay is one of those companies where iykyk. The Go-To-Market Platform for the AI Era that went from $1M ➡️$100M ARR in two years. But it wasn't always that way. Everyone I spoke to about Kareem, from employees to investors, to former colleagues and even competitors describe him as more of a philosopher who happens to be scaling a 🚀 than a typical CEO. They aren't wrong. Kareem is different. A few things we get into → Why "9-9-6" is performance art and sometimes a sign you just don't have a moat → How they run the company with “just-in-time” decision making, not exact team meetings (love this) → How they named a category instead of trying to invent one, and turned the Go To Market Engineer into a movement → Being a momentum detective & where a CEO should actually spend their time → Why he answered a pricing backlash by publishing his exact internal reasoning → Building from wholeness, and not the overplayed chip on the shoulder → The silent-retreat realization that changed how he thinks about building → The Hegelian Product Flip strategy → Why future thinking can be detrimental 00:00 Introduction 01:35 Competitive Fire and Drive 03:06 Building From Wholeness 06:42 Living in the Present 09:31 Contrarian Founder Style 14:40 Five Years in the Desert 27:35 Naming GTM Engineering 35:49 Winning Content Battles 36:10 Naming the Category 37:27 Building the Agency Channel 40:19 Pricing Backlash Playbook 43:15 Momentum Detective CEO 52:32 Trust and Tough Calls 01:03:49 Calling Out Elephants 01:06:41 Closing 👇Full episode in the comments
1:09:26

NEW EPISODE of Long Strange Trip with the CEO of Clay, Kareem Amin Clay is one of those companies where iykyk. The Go-To-Market Platform for the AI Era that went from $1M ➡️$100M ARR in two years. But it wasn't always that way. Everyone I spoke to about Kareem, from employees to investors, to former colleagues and even competitors describe him as more of a philosopher who happens to be scaling a 🚀 than a typical CEO. They aren't wrong. Kareem is different. A few things we get into → Why "9-9-6" is performance art and sometimes a sign you just don't have a moat → How they run the company with “just-in-time” decision making, not exact team meetings (love this) → How they named a category instead of trying to invent one, and turned the Go To Market Engineer into a movement → Being a momentum detective & where a CEO should actually spend their time → Why he answered a pricing backlash by publishing his exact internal reasoning → Building from wholeness, and not the overplayed chip on the shoulder → The silent-retreat realization that changed how he thinks about building → The Hegelian Product Flip strategy → Why future thinking can be detrimental 00:00 Introduction 01:35 Competitive Fire and Drive 03:06 Building From Wholeness 06:42 Living in the Present 09:31 Contrarian Founder Style 14:40 Five Years in the Desert 27:35 Naming GTM Engineering 35:49 Winning Content Battles 36:10 Naming the Category 37:27 Building the Agency Channel 40:19 Pricing Backlash Playbook 43:15 Momentum Detective CEO 52:32 Trust and Tough Calls 01:03:49 Calling Out Elephants 01:06:41 Closing 👇Full episode in the comments

Brian Halligan

81,413 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Michael Dell says the fastest way to wreck a company is to fill it with experts. He gets this from Henry Ford. "If I ever want to sabotage my competition, I would fill their ranks with experts. Experts tend to know so much, and they're so convinced that they're right, they'd get no work done." The cost isn't the bad prediction. It's the certainty. An expert who dismisses a new idea costs the company the next ten years of advantage. An expert who locks into a paradigm sees the world the way the paradigm allows. Dell points to AI as the live example. "If you took the top computer scientists and researchers in AI five years ago and said this is what's going to happen with LLMs in the next five years, probably 99 out of 100 would say no, that's not going to happen." The smartest people in the field. The ones with the credentials. The ones running the labs. Wrong. "At the limit, nobody knows anything." Most companies hire experts to remove uncertainty. Dell says the uncertainty is where the company lives. If you want to stop overthinking, and navigate any difficult decision, while supporting our channel... I made a full playbook breaking down the timeless decision-making mental models used by history's greatest thinkers. Comment "models" and follow Genius Thinking so I can DM you a copy. — Michael Dell ( Michael Dell 🇺🇸 ), founder & CEO of Dell Technologies, on David Senra's ( David Senra ) podcast
1:23

Michael Dell says the fastest way to wreck a company is to fill it with experts. He gets this from Henry Ford. "If I ever want to sabotage my competition, I would fill their ranks with experts. Experts tend to know so much, and they're so convinced that they're right, they'd get no work done." The cost isn't the bad prediction. It's the certainty. An expert who dismisses a new idea costs the company the next ten years of advantage. An expert who locks into a paradigm sees the world the way the paradigm allows. Dell points to AI as the live example. "If you took the top computer scientists and researchers in AI five years ago and said this is what's going to happen with LLMs in the next five years, probably 99 out of 100 would say no, that's not going to happen." The smartest people in the field. The ones with the credentials. The ones running the labs. Wrong. "At the limit, nobody knows anything." Most companies hire experts to remove uncertainty. Dell says the uncertainty is where the company lives. If you want to stop overthinking, and navigate any difficult decision, while supporting our channel... I made a full playbook breaking down the timeless decision-making mental models used by history's greatest thinkers. Comment "models" and follow Genius Thinking so I can DM you a copy. — Michael Dell ( Michael Dell 🇺🇸 ), founder & CEO of Dell Technologies, on David Senra's ( David Senra ) podcast

Genius Thinking

28,431 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Terence Tao: "We lived in a world with cognitive friction until very recently, where every task required us to use our brain. So we didn't really think about it, we just thought this was the cost of doing something intellectual. But now we have AI and the other technologies that can bring these frictions down to zero." Most research time is not spent having cinematic insights. It is spent checking cases, chasing references, translating intuition into computation, testing a path, finding it false, and deciding whether the failure taught you anything. AI changes the cost of that loop. Terence Tao says that now he can try “crazier things,” and that makes so much difference. Because unconventional ideas are often not rejected by proof, but by inconvenience. A mathematician may avoid a strange direction not because it is foolish, but because the bookkeeping, coding, or literature search needed to test it is too expensive for a hunch. This is where cognitive friction becomes scientific friction. Lowering it does not make taste, judgment, or proof disappear; it makes more weak signals cheap enough to inspect before they are abandoned. AI is making hesitation less expensive, and that is often where discovery begins.
1:15

Terence Tao: "We lived in a world with cognitive friction until very recently, where every task required us to use our brain. So we didn't really think about it, we just thought this was the cost of doing something intellectual. But now we have AI and the other technologies that can bring these frictions down to zero." Most research time is not spent having cinematic insights. It is spent checking cases, chasing references, translating intuition into computation, testing a path, finding it false, and deciding whether the failure taught you anything. AI changes the cost of that loop. Terence Tao says that now he can try “crazier things,” and that makes so much difference. Because unconventional ideas are often not rejected by proof, but by inconvenience. A mathematician may avoid a strange direction not because it is foolish, but because the bookkeeping, coding, or literature search needed to test it is too expensive for a hunch. This is where cognitive friction becomes scientific friction. Lowering it does not make taste, judgment, or proof disappear; it makes more weak signals cheap enough to inspect before they are abandoned. AI is making hesitation less expensive, and that is often where discovery begins.

Rohan Paul

236,056 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A manager trying to rouse his players… Cortical arousal…a call for mental activation and physical intensity… Mikel Arteta using words, sentences, phrases enveloped in tone, volume, rhythm, pause…trying to tap into memory, striving to evoke pain and pleasure, cautioning threat while willing reward. Motivation - to move towards and to move away from. Mental activation… The challenge for any coach is to recognise the cause of performance lapse. Do my players need to rise in intensity or do I need to cool the nervous system? Might a rise be true for one and a drop be true for another? Should this come from me or should this come from my players? Questions…questions! For me…pre-planned: -individual mental frameworks -a team mental framework Then time for: -players to group together to speak -the coach to assert the tactical plan enveloped in those mental frameworks -mini individual conversations An all-in feel…an integrated approach. Cortical arousal, narrative, and meaning in competitive sport are strange things. One player is best served in a state of physical dominance while another is best suited to a playful state akin to playing mate’s football. Player one: dominant, relentless, strong Player two: playful, focused, free No hard, fast rules other than this - each and every player has their ideal mind and body state that helps them to anticipate, make decisions, co-ordinate their body, and execute at an appropriate physical intensity. And that state must be found and maintained in each and every game. I love Mikel Arteta’s passion. I love his energy and his vibrancy. I also love the complexity of the human. With 11, 13, 15, 18 plauers all gawping at you, hanging on every word you say…you never quite know whether the content or the delivery is suited to everyone in the room… …you never quite know… And that’s what makes sports coaching so much fun and so intriguing. That no matter who you are and no matter what level you coach at…coaching is a decision-making process where even the very best and even the very famous are making a best guess most of the time. A best guess most of the time…
0:58

A manager trying to rouse his players… Cortical arousal…a call for mental activation and physical intensity… Mikel Arteta using words, sentences, phrases enveloped in tone, volume, rhythm, pause…trying to tap into memory, striving to evoke pain and pleasure, cautioning threat while willing reward. Motivation - to move towards and to move away from. Mental activation… The challenge for any coach is to recognise the cause of performance lapse. Do my players need to rise in intensity or do I need to cool the nervous system? Might a rise be true for one and a drop be true for another? Should this come from me or should this come from my players? Questions…questions! For me…pre-planned: -individual mental frameworks -a team mental framework Then time for: -players to group together to speak -the coach to assert the tactical plan enveloped in those mental frameworks -mini individual conversations An all-in feel…an integrated approach. Cortical arousal, narrative, and meaning in competitive sport are strange things. One player is best served in a state of physical dominance while another is best suited to a playful state akin to playing mate’s football. Player one: dominant, relentless, strong Player two: playful, focused, free No hard, fast rules other than this - each and every player has their ideal mind and body state that helps them to anticipate, make decisions, co-ordinate their body, and execute at an appropriate physical intensity. And that state must be found and maintained in each and every game. I love Mikel Arteta’s passion. I love his energy and his vibrancy. I also love the complexity of the human. With 11, 13, 15, 18 plauers all gawping at you, hanging on every word you say…you never quite know whether the content or the delivery is suited to everyone in the room… …you never quite know… And that’s what makes sports coaching so much fun and so intriguing. That no matter who you are and no matter what level you coach at…coaching is a decision-making process where even the very best and even the very famous are making a best guess most of the time. A best guess most of the time…

Daniel Abrahams

221,977 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren