Scoop marks are a big problem for the mainstream archeological narrative...

Watch all my current episodes of Ancient Technologies (Peru, Egypt & Malta) here

Yup. Think about it, what possible reason would someone have to ‘create’ scoop-like marks UNLESS it was a process by which the stone was manipulated. Which essentially leaves manipulation of the stone as the only option. They knew something we don’t.

The guy who lived here was very close to showing us… Hutch videos are so interesting… 🤔

Yeah and now he wears a pink dress, blonde wig and identifies as a princess. (no seriously)

@duke000083 Who are we talking about?

@TheProjectUnity John Hutchinson

So obviously workstations. A little area of focus where an individual is working with a grinding stone. If there was a mechanical scoop (hate to even entertain this shit), then why would it not be uniform?

It's a problem only for you guys. Archeology itself couldn't care less.

So, just a theory here, but could these marks have been made by a chisel, like flaking stone tools, but over time, left out in the elements, the chisel marks become eroded and smoothed out, making them look more like scoops?

Has anyone figured this out yet? It keeps getting ignored but keeps appearing. This isn’t natural and doesn’t seem to be a know method of working stone. Things just keep getting weirder the deeper you look 👀

Laser shovels.... Its the only explanation that fits

These appear to more likely from a grinding wheel repositioned once a desired depth was achieved, slowly wearing down the surface in each consecutive run… 🤷🏻‍♂️ in my opinion, this is more likely of afeasible theory… 💯

Everything mainstream archeology says is an obvious lie.

That site vs The "middle" stone behind Sphinx in Egypt

Has anyone tested various frequencies to see if mailable rock is possible?

Could it be, Some type of grinder removing material. Something like a cylindrical wet stone spinning real fast imbedded with diamonds.

Like butter

Looks giant die grinder marks.

Why a problem? Why can't they think outside the box?

It was not hard - it was a thick clay - think pottery clay. Hence why you could cut it into shape and scoop out. Over the years it has hardened to rock

Agree. But we should be able to find the male counter-scoops in some debris pile somewhere. Unless the removed material just turned into powder or something, where would be a lot of these "scoop" spoils around.

What do you believe created the scoop marks?

Like scooping Stone Foam / Marshmallow ...

Not really , they just ignore it and throw it on the we must ignore pile which is getting pretty big.

Had to be softer material 8000 years ago

Reminds me of Big-Red used to grind granite, we used it for grade beams, exact same profile, to wide you get very little no cutting, it looked just like what is shown. Amazing

It's Natron and Waterglass processing remnants.

Are they really? You know when you snap a block out of a quarry floor, it leaves a convex end on the block and a concavity on the floor where ut was snapped from. What if it is as simple blocks removed leaving a concavity?

yep.. the western books are pretty bad ..

Looks like it was made by grinding wheels, just needs to be a harder stone and it would work, may have had a series of them on an axle to grind level flat surfaces. Clever engineers.

Looking at the scoop marks, they look like heat curs into foam and polystyrene. Where the cutting head is a heated element. Which might explain why there is a melting effect on the stone, so it looks like shovelling stone!