Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Scott Jennings brings the screeching CNN panel back down to earth with a cold dose of common sense on the Iran deal. JENNINGS: “Look, my view of the Iranians, is this.” “A, I don’t like the idea of them having any financial relief because they take money and then...

overton_news's profile picture

Overton

268,249 subscribers

54,273 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

I hope Trump's Iran deal holds. But how do you negotiate with an apocalyptic End Times Twelver regime that religiously believes it must arm proxies, build a missile program, and become nuclear? Vice President JD Vance JD Vance gave me his response: “One of the most important lessons that [Trump has] given me in international negotiation or anything is, you don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust the words. I don’t trust the commitments that they have committed to stop funding terrorism and to stop building or buying a nuclear weapon. Those commitments are there, but I trust people’s actions. So the way we set up that deal, given the President’s directives, is that if they perform the things that they say they’re going to perform, then they get a lot of relief. And if they don’t perform any of those things, then they get nothing. For the United States, either way, we’re in a great position. They don’t get one cent of American money, regardless of how this deal takes place.”
2:26

I hope Trump's Iran deal holds. But how do you negotiate with an apocalyptic End Times Twelver regime that religiously believes it must arm proxies, build a missile program, and become nuclear? Vice President JD Vance JD Vance gave me his response: “One of the most important lessons that [Trump has] given me in international negotiation or anything is, you don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust the words. I don’t trust the commitments that they have committed to stop funding terrorism and to stop building or buying a nuclear weapon. Those commitments are there, but I trust people’s actions. So the way we set up that deal, given the President’s directives, is that if they perform the things that they say they’re going to perform, then they get a lot of relief. And if they don’t perform any of those things, then they get nothing. For the United States, either way, we’re in a great position. They don’t get one cent of American money, regardless of how this deal takes place.”

Glenn Beck

94,730 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

JD Vance on Iran deal: You will hear things about $300 billion or $24 billion, or this or that number or amount of money, and the simple fact is that the only way the Iranians get any of those resources — not a single penny, by the way, from the United States of America under any circumstances — but the only way that they would ever get any benefit of the bargain is if they comply fully and change their behavior. If the Iranians don't change their behavior, their military and their nuclear program are still destroyed; if they do change their behavior, then they are going to have a transformative relationship with the Middle East. It's a win-win for us.
0:46

JD Vance on Iran deal: You will hear things about $300 billion or $24 billion, or this or that number or amount of money, and the simple fact is that the only way the Iranians get any of those resources — not a single penny, by the way, from the United States of America under any circumstances — but the only way that they would ever get any benefit of the bargain is if they comply fully and change their behavior. If the Iranians don't change their behavior, their military and their nuclear program are still destroyed; if they do change their behavior, then they are going to have a transformative relationship with the Middle East. It's a win-win for us.

Clash Report

37,481 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”
2:36

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”

Curtis Houck

108,556 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:
1:14

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

122,267 просмотров • 25 дней назад

When Abby Phillip questioned President Trump’s deal with Iran, Scott Jennings unloaded three key points on the CNN panel about the memorandum — including what President Trump told him directly on Sunday. JENNINGS: “Well, we’re talking to them because we want this conflict to end and we want to get to an ultimate goal where Iran doesn’t have any or the capacity to make any nuclear weapons.” “That is the principal goal. That’s number one.” “Number two, it would be wise for the administration to put this document out for everybody to look at, and they ought to do it as soon as they can, both for their allies who are interested, but also for the American people, because we’ve gone to war here.” “The American people deserve to know how this is going to come to an end.” “Number three, I talked to the president on Sunday, and he was, you know, telling me he was about to sign something with Iran, and he did.” “And he was excited to get the Strait of Hormuz open.” “But he said something very important to me, which is, look, if they don’t follow through on their commitments, we will start hitting them again.” “He’s clearly not taken further military action off the table.” “So we have some miles to travel down this road. The next mile will be on Friday when there’s a formal signing for the people who don’t trust Iran.” “Look, I agree with you. I think an Iranian signature is worth very, very little. But it could be worth something if the president keeps this Middle Eastern coalition together.”
1:10

When Abby Phillip questioned President Trump’s deal with Iran, Scott Jennings unloaded three key points on the CNN panel about the memorandum — including what President Trump told him directly on Sunday. JENNINGS: “Well, we’re talking to them because we want this conflict to end and we want to get to an ultimate goal where Iran doesn’t have any or the capacity to make any nuclear weapons.” “That is the principal goal. That’s number one.” “Number two, it would be wise for the administration to put this document out for everybody to look at, and they ought to do it as soon as they can, both for their allies who are interested, but also for the American people, because we’ve gone to war here.” “The American people deserve to know how this is going to come to an end.” “Number three, I talked to the president on Sunday, and he was, you know, telling me he was about to sign something with Iran, and he did.” “And he was excited to get the Strait of Hormuz open.” “But he said something very important to me, which is, look, if they don’t follow through on their commitments, we will start hitting them again.” “He’s clearly not taken further military action off the table.” “So we have some miles to travel down this road. The next mile will be on Friday when there’s a formal signing for the people who don’t trust Iran.” “Look, I agree with you. I think an Iranian signature is worth very, very little. But it could be worth something if the president keeps this Middle Eastern coalition together.”

Overton

133,152 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Scott Jennings just pushed back hard on Abby Phillip, defending the UFC fight at the White House as exactly the kind of spectacle America deserves for its 250th. JENNINGS: “Here’s what I think.” “This is a cool thing!” “I saw it today, by the way. I was out on the street. They were testing the sound. I mean, it looks pretty cool.” “It’s part of the America 250 celebration. It’s not uncommon for presidents to have interactions with the entertainment world. Happens all the time.” “Doing it on the south lawn of the White House is, um, a little unusual, but that’s okay...” “I think we need unusual things for America 250!” “This is a HUGE deal!” PHILLIP: “This is not a circus. We don’t need unusual things.” JENNINGS: “America 250 is a big deal. We ought to be coming up with spectacles to celebrate the birthday of the country and this is one of them, and I think it’s awesome!” Scott Jennings
0:43

Scott Jennings just pushed back hard on Abby Phillip, defending the UFC fight at the White House as exactly the kind of spectacle America deserves for its 250th. JENNINGS: “Here’s what I think.” “This is a cool thing!” “I saw it today, by the way. I was out on the street. They were testing the sound. I mean, it looks pretty cool.” “It’s part of the America 250 celebration. It’s not uncommon for presidents to have interactions with the entertainment world. Happens all the time.” “Doing it on the south lawn of the White House is, um, a little unusual, but that’s okay...” “I think we need unusual things for America 250!” “This is a HUGE deal!” PHILLIP: “This is not a circus. We don’t need unusual things.” JENNINGS: “America 250 is a big deal. We ought to be coming up with spectacles to celebrate the birthday of the country and this is one of them, and I think it’s awesome!” Scott Jennings

Overton

48,624 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Fox’s Jacqui Heinrich: “Given how the Iranians have been behaving, do you have any regrets about lifting the naval blockade or giving the sanctions waivers?” President Trump: “N, no. I gave them a chance. I wanted to give them a chance at making a deal. You know, we had a deal two days ago. It was done, and then all of a sudden they couldn’t do it. They didn’t like something about the deal, they couldn’t do it, and they shot first, and that was a big mistake that they shot first, because we have been knocking the hell out of them. They’re very difficult people. 47 years we put up with it the USS Cole, you go back all the way. Thousands of people, thousands of Americans were killed. A lot of soldiers were killed. A lot of soldiers are walking around or not walking around. I mean, they’ve been so badly injured. The arms, the legs, the face with the Soleimani, with the bomb. A — they call it the roadside bomb. Most people call it the roadside bomb. It’s a disaster, and I killed him in my first administration. Had I not, it might be a different story today. He was a mad genius. He was a mad — probably a mad man. But he was a general and he had total control over the country, and I actually think the leaders of Iran were afraid of Soleimani. But I killed him. And by the way, with him went a very bad person, also. They happened to be meeting each other at the airport, and a very bad person from Iraq — happened to be a leader of Iraq — happened to be killed in that same incident. So, I don’t know if I did you a favor or not. I’ve never asked you that question. You probably would know better than me. But no, I think — I think that — I think that what we’ve done to Iran is we’ve taken away all of them, almost all of their military capability.”
1:55

Fox’s Jacqui Heinrich: “Given how the Iranians have been behaving, do you have any regrets about lifting the naval blockade or giving the sanctions waivers?” President Trump: “N, no. I gave them a chance. I wanted to give them a chance at making a deal. You know, we had a deal two days ago. It was done, and then all of a sudden they couldn’t do it. They didn’t like something about the deal, they couldn’t do it, and they shot first, and that was a big mistake that they shot first, because we have been knocking the hell out of them. They’re very difficult people. 47 years we put up with it the USS Cole, you go back all the way. Thousands of people, thousands of Americans were killed. A lot of soldiers were killed. A lot of soldiers are walking around or not walking around. I mean, they’ve been so badly injured. The arms, the legs, the face with the Soleimani, with the bomb. A — they call it the roadside bomb. Most people call it the roadside bomb. It’s a disaster, and I killed him in my first administration. Had I not, it might be a different story today. He was a mad genius. He was a mad — probably a mad man. But he was a general and he had total control over the country, and I actually think the leaders of Iran were afraid of Soleimani. But I killed him. And by the way, with him went a very bad person, also. They happened to be meeting each other at the airport, and a very bad person from Iraq — happened to be a leader of Iraq — happened to be killed in that same incident. So, I don’t know if I did you a favor or not. I’ve never asked you that question. You probably would know better than me. But no, I think — I think that — I think that what we’ve done to Iran is we’ve taken away all of them, almost all of their military capability.”

Curtis Houck

13,939 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 MARCO RUBIO ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S DEBATE WITH POPE LEO: "What the President basically said is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon because they would use it against places that have a lot of Catholics and Christians and others for that matter!" "It goes back to the central point. I think the President, without trying to speak for him, but I think I can characterize it this way. He doesn't understand why anybody, leave aside the Pope." "The President and I for that matter, I think most people, I cannot understand why ANYONE would think that it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Straits right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "They have these sailors on commercial ships that are going to starve to death out there. They don't care. They don't care that this is melting the economies around the world, even of their own allies." "This is what they're doing with the Straits. What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do."
1:22

🚨 MARCO RUBIO ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S DEBATE WITH POPE LEO: "What the President basically said is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon because they would use it against places that have a lot of Catholics and Christians and others for that matter!" "It goes back to the central point. I think the President, without trying to speak for him, but I think I can characterize it this way. He doesn't understand why anybody, leave aside the Pope." "The President and I for that matter, I think most people, I cannot understand why ANYONE would think that it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Straits right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "They have these sailors on commercial ships that are going to starve to death out there. They don't care. They don't care that this is melting the economies around the world, even of their own allies." "This is what they're doing with the Straits. What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do."

Eric Daugherty

18,840 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“The President has exactly two choices. He can pay Iran to open the Strait, or he can suffer the indignity of continuing this quagmire longer and longer. And because I listen to the Scott Jennings radio show religiously, I know that the White House has no intention of paying them to open up the Strait. A senior administration official told Scott Jennings exclusively, you should check it out, that they’re only going to pay them at the end of the process, not at the beginning of the process. The Iranians, by the way, are not going to go for that.” “That means this deal that they’ve been bragging about, which usually they brag about right before the markets open. It’s usually right before the markets open that there’s a lot of good news, and then somehow the markets go up. And then over the course of a couple of days, we find out that it was all BS. It turns out that that’s all BS because what’s going to happen is that they’re not going to want to strike this horrible deal, according to Scott Jennings’s top level sources. And that means that the deal is not going to be struck, and the war is going to go on, quite sadly, actually.”
0:55

“The President has exactly two choices. He can pay Iran to open the Strait, or he can suffer the indignity of continuing this quagmire longer and longer. And because I listen to the Scott Jennings radio show religiously, I know that the White House has no intention of paying them to open up the Strait. A senior administration official told Scott Jennings exclusively, you should check it out, that they’re only going to pay them at the end of the process, not at the beginning of the process. The Iranians, by the way, are not going to go for that.” “That means this deal that they’ve been bragging about, which usually they brag about right before the markets open. It’s usually right before the markets open that there’s a lot of good news, and then somehow the markets go up. And then over the course of a couple of days, we find out that it was all BS. It turns out that that’s all BS because what’s going to happen is that they’re not going to want to strike this horrible deal, according to Scott Jennings’s top level sources. And that means that the deal is not going to be struck, and the war is going to go on, quite sadly, actually.”

Josh Rogin

595,654 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

HOLY CRAP 🚨: Scott Jennings “Do you believe that Iran has been the world's largest state sponsor of terror for the last nearly five decades?” Val Demings: “The president is the one, Scott, who said nine months ago that he obliterated any capability that they had.” Scott Jennings: “You either do or you don’t… I would like to engage in a debate.” “Do you believe Iran is a state supporter of terror?” Val Demings: “I think the president owes the American people an explanation for why it’s okay to send our sons and daughters into a war —” Scott Jennings: “Yelling is not an answer.” “Because you're not prepared for this debate. Let me tell you what the objectives are. Number one, they are the world's largest state supporter and exporter of terrorism. Number two, they have a ballistic missile program, which we found out this past weekend can reach most of Europe.” “I see now why you don't know the objectives because you don't stop talking long enough to listen.”
1:22

HOLY CRAP 🚨: Scott Jennings “Do you believe that Iran has been the world's largest state sponsor of terror for the last nearly five decades?” Val Demings: “The president is the one, Scott, who said nine months ago that he obliterated any capability that they had.” Scott Jennings: “You either do or you don’t… I would like to engage in a debate.” “Do you believe Iran is a state supporter of terror?” Val Demings: “I think the president owes the American people an explanation for why it’s okay to send our sons and daughters into a war —” Scott Jennings: “Yelling is not an answer.” “Because you're not prepared for this debate. Let me tell you what the objectives are. Number one, they are the world's largest state supporter and exporter of terrorism. Number two, they have a ballistic missile program, which we found out this past weekend can reach most of Europe.” “I see now why you don't know the objectives because you don't stop talking long enough to listen.”

Dr Charlie Ward

80,322 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Scott Jennings: “Do you believe that Iran has been the world's largest state sponsor of terror for the last nearly five decades?” Val Demings: “The president is the one, Scott, who said nine months ago that he obliterated any capability that they had.” Scott Jennings: “You either do or you don’t… I would like to engage in a debate.” “Do you believe Iran is a state supporter of terror?” Val Demings: “I think the president owes the American people an explanation for why it’s okay to send our sons and daughters into a war —” Scott Jennings: “Yelling is not an answer.” “Because you're not prepared for this debate. Let me tell you what the objectives are. Number one, they are the world's largest state supporter and exporter of terrorism. Number two, they have a ballistic missile program, which we found out this past weekend can reach most of Europe.” “I see now why you don't know the objectives because you don't stop talking long enough to listen.”
1:22

Scott Jennings: “Do you believe that Iran has been the world's largest state sponsor of terror for the last nearly five decades?” Val Demings: “The president is the one, Scott, who said nine months ago that he obliterated any capability that they had.” Scott Jennings: “You either do or you don’t… I would like to engage in a debate.” “Do you believe Iran is a state supporter of terror?” Val Demings: “I think the president owes the American people an explanation for why it’s okay to send our sons and daughters into a war —” Scott Jennings: “Yelling is not an answer.” “Because you're not prepared for this debate. Let me tell you what the objectives are. Number one, they are the world's largest state supporter and exporter of terrorism. Number two, they have a ballistic missile program, which we found out this past weekend can reach most of Europe.” “I see now why you don't know the objectives because you don't stop talking long enough to listen.”

RedWave Press

626,507 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.Vice President JD Vance on the Iran deal: "It says, one, Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon, two, the Straits of Hormuz are open, and number 3, there are all of these benefits contemplated that the Iranians can get if they behave... If they don’t [behave], they don’t get anything."
0:48

.Vice President JD Vance on the Iran deal: "It says, one, Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon, two, the Straits of Hormuz are open, and number 3, there are all of these benefits contemplated that the Iranians can get if they behave... If they don’t [behave], they don’t get anything."

Rapid Response 47

164,735 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Remember you do not need to trust certain folks but I would always listen for the message or you are doing yourself a disservice. It was stated because folks did not believe us they would reprogram our loved ones with the very people that programmed them via the idiot box It is all they trust. Time for 40,000 ft view Remember I don’t like any of these people. None of them. I do like messages though. ALL OF THEM…..
0:56

Remember you do not need to trust certain folks but I would always listen for the message or you are doing yourself a disservice. It was stated because folks did not believe us they would reprogram our loved ones with the very people that programmed them via the idiot box It is all they trust. Time for 40,000 ft view Remember I don’t like any of these people. None of them. I do like messages though. ALL OF THEM…..

Joey dark 2 Light

21,897 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This hack actually works, if you go near the end of the store hours before close and ask the shop if they have any mistakes you can have or buy, most of the time they will give them to you. The only thing I would keep in mind is that allot of the time, the less fortunate people usually do this. Back in high school, when I worked at a pizza shop, we always had some people down on their luck people hoping to get a cheap pizza or a free one, many of the times I wouldn’t actually give it to them. I didn’t care, the money didn’t come out of my pocket so I just made them a fresh one, was I wrong for this or would you do that too?
0:26

This hack actually works, if you go near the end of the store hours before close and ask the shop if they have any mistakes you can have or buy, most of the time they will give them to you. The only thing I would keep in mind is that allot of the time, the less fortunate people usually do this. Back in high school, when I worked at a pizza shop, we always had some people down on their luck people hoping to get a cheap pizza or a free one, many of the times I wouldn’t actually give it to them. I didn’t care, the money didn’t come out of my pocket so I just made them a fresh one, was I wrong for this or would you do that too?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

2,293,158 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

JD Vance just obliterated the talking point that the signed MOU with Iran is anything like the failed JCPOA under Obama: "I think you're unfortunately making the same mistake that a lot of Iranian propagandists are making when they're talking about this. They talk about the benefits to the Iranians without any of the things the Iranians would have to give up and change to get any of those benefits." "You mentioned a $300 billion fund. I got to be very clear about this: Not a single cent of American money under any circumstance, no matter what the Iranians do, goes to Iran." "Let's say the UAE wants to invest in a new power plant in Iran. What this deal provides is that if the Iranians have done everything we require them to do, then we will allow the UAE to do that. They can't do that right now without American approval." "What we're fundamentally saying is that if the Iranians transform how they interact with the world, we will transform how the world economy interacts with Iran." "There's a fundamental refusal to acknowledge how much has changed in the Middle East over the last few months."
4:40

JD Vance just obliterated the talking point that the signed MOU with Iran is anything like the failed JCPOA under Obama: "I think you're unfortunately making the same mistake that a lot of Iranian propagandists are making when they're talking about this. They talk about the benefits to the Iranians without any of the things the Iranians would have to give up and change to get any of those benefits." "You mentioned a $300 billion fund. I got to be very clear about this: Not a single cent of American money under any circumstance, no matter what the Iranians do, goes to Iran." "Let's say the UAE wants to invest in a new power plant in Iran. What this deal provides is that if the Iranians have done everything we require them to do, then we will allow the UAE to do that. They can't do that right now without American approval." "What we're fundamentally saying is that if the Iranians transform how they interact with the world, we will transform how the world economy interacts with Iran." "There's a fundamental refusal to acknowledge how much has changed in the Middle East over the last few months."

Andrew Kolvet

96,427 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”
1:59

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”

Curtis Houck

51,169 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance OBLITERATES Jessica Tarlov claiming President Trump is giving stuff away to Iran "Jessica, you're making the SAME MISTAKE, unfortunately, that a lot of the Iranian propagandists make." "They talk about the benefits to the Iranians without ANY of the things Iran has to give up." "You mentioned $300B...not a single cent of American money under any circumstance, no matter what the Iranians do, goes to Iran, not a single cent of American money!" "This says, for example, let's say that the United Arab Emirates, who have been a great ally, let's say they want to invest in a power plant in Iran, what this deal provides is that if the Iranians have done everything we require them to do, then we will allow the United Arab Emirates to do that." "Because they can't do that right now without American approval. So we're fundamentally saying if the Iranians transform how they interact with the world, we will transform how the world economy interacts with Iran!" "But if they don't do any of that stuff, they don't get any of these benefits. So I think all the Democrats who are saying, well, the Iranians get all these things, they don't get anything unless there's been a complete transformation of how Iran interacts with the world, that would be a huge win for America!" "If they don't do any of these things, we don't give them anything. They don't receive anything. Their nuclear program is still destroyed. Their military is still destroyed. Their missile program and industrial base is still destroyed. We fundamentally have transformed the Middle East. Whether they comply or not, this is just icing on the cake, assuming they do all the right things."
2:16

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance OBLITERATES Jessica Tarlov claiming President Trump is giving stuff away to Iran "Jessica, you're making the SAME MISTAKE, unfortunately, that a lot of the Iranian propagandists make." "They talk about the benefits to the Iranians without ANY of the things Iran has to give up." "You mentioned $300B...not a single cent of American money under any circumstance, no matter what the Iranians do, goes to Iran, not a single cent of American money!" "This says, for example, let's say that the United Arab Emirates, who have been a great ally, let's say they want to invest in a power plant in Iran, what this deal provides is that if the Iranians have done everything we require them to do, then we will allow the United Arab Emirates to do that." "Because they can't do that right now without American approval. So we're fundamentally saying if the Iranians transform how they interact with the world, we will transform how the world economy interacts with Iran!" "But if they don't do any of that stuff, they don't get any of these benefits. So I think all the Democrats who are saying, well, the Iranians get all these things, they don't get anything unless there's been a complete transformation of how Iran interacts with the world, that would be a huge win for America!" "If they don't do any of these things, we don't give them anything. They don't receive anything. Their nuclear program is still destroyed. Their military is still destroyed. Their missile program and industrial base is still destroyed. We fundamentally have transformed the Middle East. Whether they comply or not, this is just icing on the cake, assuming they do all the right things."

Eric Daugherty

506,861 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Scott Jennings UNLOADS on Tucker Carlson after his “sorry for misleading people” comments about President Trump. “He’s kind of a moron. I mean, I don’t know how else to put it.” JENNINGS: “I mean, is his preference that Kamala Harris had become the president of the United States?” “That will come as a surprise to, I’m sure, a lot of people who used to view Tucker Carlson as a conservative and someone who, you know, had certain kinds of values.” “And what’s he sorry for? That we got into an engagement here that might ultimately lead to taking away nuclear weapons from Iran.” “I mean, is he now claiming he had no idea that Donald Trump held the position that he would never permit Iran to have nuclear weapons?” “If that’s what he’s saying today, he’s kind of a moron.” “I mean, I don’t know how else to put it or he’s willfully misleading people.” “The president was clear he’ll never let them have nuclear weapons.”
1:18

Scott Jennings UNLOADS on Tucker Carlson after his “sorry for misleading people” comments about President Trump. “He’s kind of a moron. I mean, I don’t know how else to put it.” JENNINGS: “I mean, is his preference that Kamala Harris had become the president of the United States?” “That will come as a surprise to, I’m sure, a lot of people who used to view Tucker Carlson as a conservative and someone who, you know, had certain kinds of values.” “And what’s he sorry for? That we got into an engagement here that might ultimately lead to taking away nuclear weapons from Iran.” “I mean, is he now claiming he had no idea that Donald Trump held the position that he would never permit Iran to have nuclear weapons?” “If that’s what he’s saying today, he’s kind of a moron.” “I mean, I don’t know how else to put it or he’s willfully misleading people.” “The president was clear he’ll never let them have nuclear weapons.”

Overton

246,328 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “Your Director of National Counterterrorism, Joe Kent — he just resigned today. He said he can’t support your conflict with Iran. What’s your reaction to that? And did you —” President Trump: “Well, I read his statement. I always thought it was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security, very weak on security. I didn’t know him well, but I thought he seemed like a pretty nice guy, but when I read a statement, I realized that it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat — every country realized what a threat Iran was. The question is whether or not they wanted to do something about it. And many people, many of the greatest military scholars are saying for years that presidents should have taken out Iran because they wanted a nuclear weapon. They were — if we didn’t do the attack or if I’ll go a step further, if I didn’t terminate the Iran nuclear deal given to us, one of the worst deals ever made by Barack Hussein Obama. Remember when they sent Boeing 757 over there loaded with cash, hundreds of millions of dollars? You would have been very happy. This was a wonderful — they sent hundreds of million — people forget that. Does anybody remember, right? You remember! Hundreds of millions of dollars in a Boeing 757. I think they had two of them loaded. They took the seats out and they put cash. And it was so much that there wasn’t a bank in Virginia, Maryland, or DC that had any money left. They stripped them of all their money, put it into planes, sent it to Iran almost as ransom. That’s not going to happen with Trump. And nobody ever did anything about it. Nobody ever said anything. Can you imagine if I did that? So, they’ve been a threat for a long time, but they’ve really been a threat. If — if I didn’t terminate Obama’s horrible deal that he made, the Iran nuclear deal, you would have had a nuclear war four years ago. You would have had — you would have had nuclear holocaust, and you would have had it again if we didn’t bomb the site. So, when somebody is working with us that says they didn’t think Iran was a threat, we don’t want those people because — and there are some people, I guess, that would say that, but they’re not smart people or they’re not savvy people. Iran was a tremendous threat. And virtually every NATO nation — and this is the thing, if they told me it wasn’t a threat and therefore they don’t want to help, but when they say it was a threat and it was a major threat — every one of them — I think every one of them — I don’t know of one that said they’re not a threat, but when they say it was a threat, but we’re not going to help, I think they’re very foolish. You know, it’s interesting. It’s interesting because I could say this, that what’s happening in Ukraine, we’re probably in there for $400 billion. We don’t spend any money anymore. They buy it from us and they pay full price. But Biden gave them between 350 and $400 billion of equipment and cash. Someday, they’ll have to find out about the cash, and you could say that wasn’t a threat. You know, we’re helping them, so we helped them and they didn’t help us. And I think that’s a very bad thing for NATO.”
3:25

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “Your Director of National Counterterrorism, Joe Kent — he just resigned today. He said he can’t support your conflict with Iran. What’s your reaction to that? And did you —” President Trump: “Well, I read his statement. I always thought it was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security, very weak on security. I didn’t know him well, but I thought he seemed like a pretty nice guy, but when I read a statement, I realized that it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat — every country realized what a threat Iran was. The question is whether or not they wanted to do something about it. And many people, many of the greatest military scholars are saying for years that presidents should have taken out Iran because they wanted a nuclear weapon. They were — if we didn’t do the attack or if I’ll go a step further, if I didn’t terminate the Iran nuclear deal given to us, one of the worst deals ever made by Barack Hussein Obama. Remember when they sent Boeing 757 over there loaded with cash, hundreds of millions of dollars? You would have been very happy. This was a wonderful — they sent hundreds of million — people forget that. Does anybody remember, right? You remember! Hundreds of millions of dollars in a Boeing 757. I think they had two of them loaded. They took the seats out and they put cash. And it was so much that there wasn’t a bank in Virginia, Maryland, or DC that had any money left. They stripped them of all their money, put it into planes, sent it to Iran almost as ransom. That’s not going to happen with Trump. And nobody ever did anything about it. Nobody ever said anything. Can you imagine if I did that? So, they’ve been a threat for a long time, but they’ve really been a threat. If — if I didn’t terminate Obama’s horrible deal that he made, the Iran nuclear deal, you would have had a nuclear war four years ago. You would have had — you would have had nuclear holocaust, and you would have had it again if we didn’t bomb the site. So, when somebody is working with us that says they didn’t think Iran was a threat, we don’t want those people because — and there are some people, I guess, that would say that, but they’re not smart people or they’re not savvy people. Iran was a tremendous threat. And virtually every NATO nation — and this is the thing, if they told me it wasn’t a threat and therefore they don’t want to help, but when they say it was a threat and it was a major threat — every one of them — I think every one of them — I don’t know of one that said they’re not a threat, but when they say it was a threat, but we’re not going to help, I think they’re very foolish. You know, it’s interesting. It’s interesting because I could say this, that what’s happening in Ukraine, we’re probably in there for $400 billion. We don’t spend any money anymore. They buy it from us and they pay full price. But Biden gave them between 350 and $400 billion of equipment and cash. Someday, they’ll have to find out about the cash, and you could say that wasn’t a threat. You know, we’re helping them, so we helped them and they didn’t help us. And I think that’s a very bad thing for NATO.”

Curtis Houck

12,646 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Bill Maher on COVID: “[The government] said a lot of things that weren’t true, and they squelched a lot of opinions that turned out to be true. I do like to look back on COVID because I do think that I was kind of right about it. I never wanted that particular vaccine for that particular disease, which I thought my own immune system could handle, and I bet it could.” “I said a million times, another [disease] that could come along, I would fight you for the vaccine… [The Hantavirus] is that one… It’s harder to get, but I hate to tell ya, if you do get it, don’t buy any green bananas.” “You cried wolf with the other one with the masks and the distancing and the pretending that natural immunity didn’t count anymore. All of this bullsh*t.”
0:58

Bill Maher on COVID: “[The government] said a lot of things that weren’t true, and they squelched a lot of opinions that turned out to be true. I do like to look back on COVID because I do think that I was kind of right about it. I never wanted that particular vaccine for that particular disease, which I thought my own immune system could handle, and I bet it could.” “I said a million times, another [disease] that could come along, I would fight you for the vaccine… [The Hantavirus] is that one… It’s harder to get, but I hate to tell ya, if you do get it, don’t buy any green bananas.” “You cried wolf with the other one with the masks and the distancing and the pretending that natural immunity didn’t count anymore. All of this bullsh*t.”

RedWave Press

165,029 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад