Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨 Scott Jennings just delivered a DEVASTATING reality check to the CNN panel about why NATO should care about the Iran conflict. The Democrats on the panel hated every second of Scott Jennings exposing the ugly reality of the relationship. JENNINGS: “You know why NATO should care about this?”... “It was just a couple of weeks ago that we learned that Iran has ballistic missile capabilities that can reach most of Europe.” “On top of that, does no one else here find it agitating that we spend billions and trillions of dollars over decades.” “We have U.S. Troops stationed in all these bases with all these allies.” “And then when we decide that we need to do something that is in our national security interest, you have supposed friends of the United States saying you can’t use these bases.” “We’re not going to permit this. We’re not going to help you on that.” “It is AGITATING. It is agitating.” “But bottom line, why doesn’t Europe look at this ballistic missile threat a little more seriously?” “That’s what I wonder.”show more

Overton

257,398 subscribers

64,602 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 Secretary Marco Rubio delivers a DEVASTATING reality check — NATO is now a “one-way street” and he dropped a MAJOR hint about what’s coming after Iran. “Unfortunately, after this conflict is concluded, we’re going to have to reexamine that relationship.” RUBIO: “If now we’ve reached a point where the NATO alliance means that we can’t use those bases, that in fact, that we can no longer use those bases to defend America’s interests, then NATO is a one-way street.” “Then NATO is simply about us having troops in Europe to defend Europe but when we need their help, not their help, we’re not asking them to conduct air strikes, when we need them to allow us to use their military bases, their answer is no?” “Then why are we in NATO? You have to ask that question.” “Why do we have billions, hundreds of billions of dollars over the years, trillions of dollars, and all of these American forces stationed in the region, if we can only...in our time of need we’re not going to be allowed to use those bases.” “So I think there is no doubt unfortunately, after this conflict is concluded, we’re going to have to reexamine that relationship.” “We’re going to have to reexamine the value of NATO and that alliance for our country.” Rubio just laid it out — America has been carrying NATO while “allies” sit on their hands in our time of need. This is the wake-up call.

🚨 Secretary Marco Rubio delivers a DEVASTATING reality check — NATO is now a “one-way street” and he dropped a MAJOR hint about what’s coming after Iran. “Unfortunately, after this conflict is concluded, we’re going to have to reexamine that relationship.” RUBIO: “If now we’ve reached a point where the NATO alliance means that we can’t use those bases, that in fact, that we can no longer use those bases to defend America’s interests, then NATO is a one-way street.” “Then NATO is simply about us having troops in Europe to defend Europe but when we need their help, not their help, we’re not asking them to conduct air strikes, when we need them to allow us to use their military bases, their answer is no?” “Then why are we in NATO? You have to ask that question.” “Why do we have billions, hundreds of billions of dollars over the years, trillions of dollars, and all of these American forces stationed in the region, if we can only...in our time of need we’re not going to be allowed to use those bases.” “So I think there is no doubt unfortunately, after this conflict is concluded, we’re going to have to reexamine that relationship.” “We’re going to have to reexamine the value of NATO and that alliance for our country.” Rubio just laid it out — America has been carrying NATO while “allies” sit on their hands in our time of need. This is the wake-up call.

Overton

438,390 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 HOLY CRAP. Sec. Marco Rubio just RIPPED spoiled NATO allies, saying the US will have to reexamine our membership once the war is over NATO screwed up! "We are going to have to reexamine whether or not this alliance that has served this country well for a while is still serving that purpose — or is it now become a ONE WAY STREET, where America is simply in a position to defend EUROPE, but when we need the help of our allies, they're going to deny us basing rights and they're going to deny us overflight?!" "If now we have reached a point where the NATO alliance means that we can't use those bases, that, in fact, that we can no longer use those bases to defend America's interests, then NATO is a one-way street!" "Then NATO is simply about us having troops in Europe to defend Europe, but when we need their help—not their help, we're not asking them to conduct airstrikes. When we need them to allow us to use their military bases, their answer is no, then why are we in NATO? You have to ask that question!" "Why do we have billions and billions of dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars over the years, trillions of dollars, and all these American forces stationed in the region?" "If we can only use—we can—in our time of need, we're not going to be allowed to use those bases. So I think there's no doubt, unfortunately, after this conflict is concluded, we are going to have to reexamine that relationship." "We're going to have to reexamine the value of NATO and that alliance for our country." "Ultimately, that's a decision for the president to make, and he'll have to make it."

🚨 HOLY CRAP. Sec. Marco Rubio just RIPPED spoiled NATO allies, saying the US will have to reexamine our membership once the war is over NATO screwed up! "We are going to have to reexamine whether or not this alliance that has served this country well for a while is still serving that purpose — or is it now become a ONE WAY STREET, where America is simply in a position to defend EUROPE, but when we need the help of our allies, they're going to deny us basing rights and they're going to deny us overflight?!" "If now we have reached a point where the NATO alliance means that we can't use those bases, that, in fact, that we can no longer use those bases to defend America's interests, then NATO is a one-way street!" "Then NATO is simply about us having troops in Europe to defend Europe, but when we need their help—not their help, we're not asking them to conduct airstrikes. When we need them to allow us to use their military bases, their answer is no, then why are we in NATO? You have to ask that question!" "Why do we have billions and billions of dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars over the years, trillions of dollars, and all these American forces stationed in the region?" "If we can only use—we can—in our time of need, we're not going to be allowed to use those bases. So I think there's no doubt, unfortunately, after this conflict is concluded, we are going to have to reexamine that relationship." "We're going to have to reexamine the value of NATO and that alliance for our country." "Ultimately, that's a decision for the president to make, and he'll have to make it."

Eric Daugherty

140,383 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Jennings: You have supposed friends of the US saying you can't use these bases. Phillip:Are they not right to wonder why weren't they consulted before trump decided to wage a war? It sounds like you think it's in their defense. Jennings: It is in defense of all of Europe Phillip: Shouldn’t they have been consulted? Jennings: Consulted? We decided it was in our national security interest. Phillip: So, that makes it our war.

Jennings: You have supposed friends of the US saying you can't use these bases. Phillip:Are they not right to wonder why weren't they consulted before trump decided to wage a war? It sounds like you think it's in their defense. Jennings: It is in defense of all of Europe Phillip: Shouldn’t they have been consulted? Jennings: Consulted? We decided it was in our national security interest. Phillip: So, that makes it our war.

Acyn

517,436 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

SECRETARY RUBIO: Why are we in NATO? You have to ask that question. Why do we send trillions of dollars and have all of these American forces stationed in the region, if in our time of need, we won't be allowed to use those bases?

SECRETARY RUBIO: Why are we in NATO? You have to ask that question. Why do we send trillions of dollars and have all of these American forces stationed in the region, if in our time of need, we won't be allowed to use those bases?

Department of State

1,574,601 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Rutte called Putin the governor of Texas and stated that he does not care about Russia's opinion on NATO troops in Ukraine. "Why should we care what Russia thinks about troops in Ukraine? That is not for Russia to decide. Honestly, I am amazed. I'm not criticizing you, but I often hear this question. Thank you for asking it, but I am really surprised. Russia has nothing to do with this at all. It's the same as if Finland had to get 'permission' from Russia to join NATO. Of course not. And Sweden too — no. When we created NATO in the past, we were sovereign countries. Ukraine is a sovereign country. If Ukraine wants to have forces to ensure security on its territory to support peace — that is its decision. No one else can decide on that. And I think we really need to stop making Putin too powerful. He is like the governor of Texas, no more. So we shouldn't take it too seriously." - SK

Rutte called Putin the governor of Texas and stated that he does not care about Russia's opinion on NATO troops in Ukraine. "Why should we care what Russia thinks about troops in Ukraine? That is not for Russia to decide. Honestly, I am amazed. I'm not criticizing you, but I often hear this question. Thank you for asking it, but I am really surprised. Russia has nothing to do with this at all. It's the same as if Finland had to get 'permission' from Russia to join NATO. Of course not. And Sweden too — no. When we created NATO in the past, we were sovereign countries. Ukraine is a sovereign country. If Ukraine wants to have forces to ensure security on its territory to support peace — that is its decision. No one else can decide on that. And I think we really need to stop making Putin too powerful. He is like the governor of Texas, no more. So we shouldn't take it too seriously." - SK

Zlatti71

240,855 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 23-year-old MeidasTouch commentator Adam Mockler tried to trap Scott Jennings with a gotcha question about Europe “cleaning up our mess.” Jennings immediately flipped the script and left Mockler looking completely clueless live on air. MOCKLER: “You just said this was our national security interest.” JENNINGS: “It is our national security interest.” MOCKLER: “Okay, so then why is the onus on Europe to clean up our mess?” JENNINGS: “The the onus is on Europe to defend themselves, and the onus is on president of the United States to defend the national security of the United States.” MOCKLER: “But...you’re not asking Europe to defend itself...” JENNINGS: “Western civilization is in this together, and these fanatics have missiles that can strike most of Europe and they have nuclear material as well.” “It’s pretty obvious.”

🚨 23-year-old MeidasTouch commentator Adam Mockler tried to trap Scott Jennings with a gotcha question about Europe “cleaning up our mess.” Jennings immediately flipped the script and left Mockler looking completely clueless live on air. MOCKLER: “You just said this was our national security interest.” JENNINGS: “It is our national security interest.” MOCKLER: “Okay, so then why is the onus on Europe to clean up our mess?” JENNINGS: “The the onus is on Europe to defend themselves, and the onus is on president of the United States to defend the national security of the United States.” MOCKLER: “But...you’re not asking Europe to defend itself...” JENNINGS: “Western civilization is in this together, and these fanatics have missiles that can strike most of Europe and they have nuclear material as well.” “It’s pretty obvious.”

Overton

454,706 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“GET YOUR F*CKING HAND OUT OF MY FACE!” This was the moment everyone’s been waiting for. Scott Jennings FINALLY snaps on MeidasTouch punk Adam Mockler after the he crossed the line and started pointing his finger in Jennings’ face on live TV. MOCKLER: “We all know that Scott Jennings is more than happy to defend a war with a country that starts with letters IRA that we are currently failing, that is going to put us trillions and trillions of dollars more in debt.” “I was only a few years old while you were in the administration defending prior endless wars. Now this war is failing.” JENNINGS: “Eight weeks is endless to you?” MOCKLER: “Okay. You said it was going to be 4 to 6 weeks!” JENNINGS: “You have the attention span of a gnat? Is that what you have?” MOCKLER: “I debated you on TV four to six weeks ago, and you said we were weeks away from it. Now you’re making condescending remarks because you can’t defend the fact that this war is not going your way.” JENNINGS: “Not going our way?!” [Mockler wags his finger in Jennings’ face] MOCKLER: “Wait one more time, can you name one political concession—” This was the moment Jennings threw down the gauntlet. JENNINGS: “Get your F*CKING hand out of my face! First of all!” Abby Phillip immediately tried to play referee. JENNINGS: “Honestly, I’m not going to have this guy’s finger in my face.” Jennings put Mockler in his place once and for all.

“GET YOUR FCKING HAND OUT OF MY FACE!” This was the moment everyone’s been waiting for. Scott Jennings FINALLY snaps on MeidasTouch punk Adam Mockler after the he crossed the line and started pointing his finger in Jennings’ face on live TV. MOCKLER: “We all know that Scott Jennings is more than happy to defend a war with a country that starts with letters IRA that we are currently failing, that is going to put us trillions and trillions of dollars more in debt.” “I was only a few years old while you were in the administration defending prior endless wars. Now this war is failing.” JENNINGS: “Eight weeks is endless to you?” MOCKLER: “Okay. You said it was going to be 4 to 6 weeks!” JENNINGS: “You have the attention span of a gnat? Is that what you have?” MOCKLER: “I debated you on TV four to six weeks ago, and you said we were weeks away from it. Now you’re making condescending remarks because you can’t defend the fact that this war is not going your way.” JENNINGS: “Not going our way?!” [Mockler wags his finger in Jennings’ face] MOCKLER: “Wait one more time, can you name one political concession—” This was the moment Jennings threw down the gauntlet. JENNINGS: “Get your FCKING hand out of my face! First of all!” Abby Phillip immediately tried to play referee. JENNINGS: “Honestly, I’m not going to have this guy’s finger in my face.” Jennings put Mockler in his place once and for all.

Overton

602,578 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Democrats on CNN were doing everything they could to spin the Iran ceasefire as a LOSS for President Trump. Then Scott Jennings FORCED the entire panel to confront the one question they couldn’t answer: “Why can’t we look at this as a glass half-full moment?” PHILLIP: “The same table that we have tonight is the table that existed yesterday, in large part.” “And…and fundamentally, the only thing that has been agreed to is that Iran will continue to control the Strait of Hormuz and will allow ships to go through on their control.” “That is the ONLY thing that has been agreed to.” JENNINGS: “The strait is going to be reopened, and we’re going to negotiate about the rest.” “Beyond that, we don’t really know much of anything.” “But I will tell you, yesterday Iran was saying we’re cutting off, you know, talks. We’re not going to continue the talks.” “The president uses some extreme language and all of a sudden, voila, tonight we have a ceasefire for two weeks.” “Why can’t we just say, you know what? Maybe we have achieved military objectives.” “Maybe we have taken down their military and their ability to export terror.” “Maybe we have decimated their missiles.” “Maybe we’ve buried the nuclear material, and maybe we’ve got two weeks to make the world a safer place!” “Why can’t we look at this as a glass half-full moment?” “As opposed to…you know, we have to make it negative for Donald Trump.”

The Democrats on CNN were doing everything they could to spin the Iran ceasefire as a LOSS for President Trump. Then Scott Jennings FORCED the entire panel to confront the one question they couldn’t answer: “Why can’t we look at this as a glass half-full moment?” PHILLIP: “The same table that we have tonight is the table that existed yesterday, in large part.” “And…and fundamentally, the only thing that has been agreed to is that Iran will continue to control the Strait of Hormuz and will allow ships to go through on their control.” “That is the ONLY thing that has been agreed to.” JENNINGS: “The strait is going to be reopened, and we’re going to negotiate about the rest.” “Beyond that, we don’t really know much of anything.” “But I will tell you, yesterday Iran was saying we’re cutting off, you know, talks. We’re not going to continue the talks.” “The president uses some extreme language and all of a sudden, voila, tonight we have a ceasefire for two weeks.” “Why can’t we just say, you know what? Maybe we have achieved military objectives.” “Maybe we have taken down their military and their ability to export terror.” “Maybe we have decimated their missiles.” “Maybe we’ve buried the nuclear material, and maybe we’ve got two weeks to make the world a safer place!” “Why can’t we look at this as a glass half-full moment?” “As opposed to…you know, we have to make it negative for Donald Trump.”

Overton

462,665 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Scott Jennings catches former Clinton White House aide Keith Boykin trying to BLAME the United States for the September 11th terrorist attacks. When Scott Jennings called him out moments later, Boykin flat out DENIED it and began to SPIRAL live on air. BOYKIN: “No matter what happens with Iran and the United States, that there will be some sort of long term consequences that we may not see in the next few weeks or months or years but may come some decades later, just as we saw in 1979 with the Iran hostage crisis, which happened because of the 1953 when we overthrew their democratically elected government.” “And the same thing happened when we saw 9/11.” “That was because of the United States involvement in the first Gulf War and had a long term effect.” When Jennings took the mic, he immediately went back to Boykin’s claim. JENNINGS: “I just want to go back to 9/11 for a second.” “The idea that the United States had it coming is INSANE!” BOYKIN: “I never said that! Never said it. Don’t put words in my mouth!” JENNINGS: “You did! You literally invoked it.” BOYKIN: “I’m not going to allow you to sit here and lie about what I just said.” JENNINGS: “You said, WE did SOMETHING and that CAUSED it.” BOYKIN: “Scott, I don’t even know…why…why…why you’re…” JENNINGS: “I mean, we’re going to roll the tape later and everybody’s going to see it.” Boykin then completely unraveled after Jennings called him out.

Scott Jennings catches former Clinton White House aide Keith Boykin trying to BLAME the United States for the September 11th terrorist attacks. When Scott Jennings called him out moments later, Boykin flat out DENIED it and began to SPIRAL live on air. BOYKIN: “No matter what happens with Iran and the United States, that there will be some sort of long term consequences that we may not see in the next few weeks or months or years but may come some decades later, just as we saw in 1979 with the Iran hostage crisis, which happened because of the 1953 when we overthrew their democratically elected government.” “And the same thing happened when we saw 9/11.” “That was because of the United States involvement in the first Gulf War and had a long term effect.” When Jennings took the mic, he immediately went back to Boykin’s claim. JENNINGS: “I just want to go back to 9/11 for a second.” “The idea that the United States had it coming is INSANE!” BOYKIN: “I never said that! Never said it. Don’t put words in my mouth!” JENNINGS: “You did! You literally invoked it.” BOYKIN: “I’m not going to allow you to sit here and lie about what I just said.” JENNINGS: “You said, WE did SOMETHING and that CAUSED it.” BOYKIN: “Scott, I don’t even know…why…why…why you’re…” JENNINGS: “I mean, we’re going to roll the tape later and everybody’s going to see it.” Boykin then completely unraveled after Jennings called him out.

Overton

565,100 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Ben Shapiro: “When should the government pay you to retire?… If we really believe we can’t raise the retirement age and we’re never going to change that, we will go bankrupt.” “Whatever DOGE is doing, that’s not going to touch the real driver of systemic debt in the United States.” “The amount people are taking out is not the amount going in which is why we’re going bankrupt.” Ana Kasparian: “I just totally reject what you just said about how we’re going bankrupt due to social security. Really? You don’t think like the trillions of dollars we’ve spent on wars in the Middle East may have something to do with that?” Ben Shapiro: “It’s not even remotely a percentage of what we spend on social security.”

Ben Shapiro: “When should the government pay you to retire?… If we really believe we can’t raise the retirement age and we’re never going to change that, we will go bankrupt.” “Whatever DOGE is doing, that’s not going to touch the real driver of systemic debt in the United States.” “The amount people are taking out is not the amount going in which is why we’re going bankrupt.” Ana Kasparian: “I just totally reject what you just said about how we’re going bankrupt due to social security. Really? You don’t think like the trillions of dollars we’ve spent on wars in the Middle East may have something to do with that?” Ben Shapiro: “It’s not even remotely a percentage of what we spend on social security.”

RedWave Press

1,182,462 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

GEN FLYNN: The National Security Strategy the President just signed off on is focused more globally externally than it is internally. — I do think one of the things it falls short on is the ideological stuff that’s going on here in the United States: the media manipulation, the idea of this Marxism and Neo-Marxism ideology that is definitely inside and has infiltrated into the institutions of our government. There’s not enough discussion about how the President of the United States, in this National Security Strategy which should be both foreign and domestic, has to deal with. We have many compromised oversight systems, we have a very complex election system and technologies. People in this country are still going, what the hell is going on? Why do I care about Europe? Why do I care about the Middle East? I need to care about my country right here and whether or not we have a free and fair election. General Mike Flynn

GEN FLYNN: The National Security Strategy the President just signed off on is focused more globally externally than it is internally. — I do think one of the things it falls short on is the ideological stuff that’s going on here in the United States: the media manipulation, the idea of this Marxism and Neo-Marxism ideology that is definitely inside and has infiltrated into the institutions of our government. There’s not enough discussion about how the President of the United States, in this National Security Strategy which should be both foreign and domestic, has to deal with. We have many compromised oversight systems, we have a very complex election system and technologies. People in this country are still going, what the hell is going on? Why do I care about Europe? Why do I care about the Middle East? I need to care about my country right here and whether or not we have a free and fair election. General Mike Flynn

Bannon’s WarRoom

14,963 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Scott Jennings makes former Democrat Rep. Max Rose look like a complete fool on CNN after he claimed “Donald Trump started it” with Iran. JENNINGS: “You said Donald Trump started this. You seem to have some amnesia about the fact that Iran has been at war with the United States for 47 YEARS!” “And as the president said, he’s finally the one that’s dealing with it.” “They’ve killed thousands of Americans. They’ve funded terror proxies that have destabilized the region.” “They’ve been after us chanting death to America for five decades, and you think that we just decided to pick on Iran for no reason this spring?” “This was long overdue.” “And if at the end of it they don’t have nuclear weapons, and at the end of it, we do have a stable Middle East, and at the end of it, we do have a situation where they’re not funding terror proxies, terrorizing our friends and allies over there, that’ll be a good thing.”

Scott Jennings makes former Democrat Rep. Max Rose look like a complete fool on CNN after he claimed “Donald Trump started it” with Iran. JENNINGS: “You said Donald Trump started this. You seem to have some amnesia about the fact that Iran has been at war with the United States for 47 YEARS!” “And as the president said, he’s finally the one that’s dealing with it.” “They’ve killed thousands of Americans. They’ve funded terror proxies that have destabilized the region.” “They’ve been after us chanting death to America for five decades, and you think that we just decided to pick on Iran for no reason this spring?” “This was long overdue.” “And if at the end of it they don’t have nuclear weapons, and at the end of it, we do have a stable Middle East, and at the end of it, we do have a situation where they’re not funding terror proxies, terrorizing our friends and allies over there, that’ll be a good thing.”

Overton

83,511 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 NOW - JD VANCE ON ACQUIRING GREENLAND: "We're asking our European friends to take the security of that landmass more seriously, because if they're not? The United States is going to have to do something about it." "Take the president of the United States seriously." "Set aside the crazy overreactions from the press and certain people in Europe." "What has the president said? Greenland is really important, not just to America's missile defense, but to the world's missile defense." "Number two, we know that there are hostile adversaries that have shown a lot of interest in that particular territory, that particular slice of the world."

🚨 NOW - JD VANCE ON ACQUIRING GREENLAND: "We're asking our European friends to take the security of that landmass more seriously, because if they're not? The United States is going to have to do something about it." "Take the president of the United States seriously." "Set aside the crazy overreactions from the press and certain people in Europe." "What has the president said? Greenland is really important, not just to America's missile defense, but to the world's missile defense." "Number two, we know that there are hostile adversaries that have shown a lot of interest in that particular territory, that particular slice of the world."

Eric Daugherty

113,291 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“The President has exactly two choices. He can pay Iran to open the Strait, or he can suffer the indignity of continuing this quagmire longer and longer. And because I listen to the Scott Jennings radio show religiously, I know that the White House has no intention of paying them to open up the Strait. A senior administration official told Scott Jennings exclusively, you should check it out, that they’re only going to pay them at the end of the process, not at the beginning of the process. The Iranians, by the way, are not going to go for that.” “That means this deal that they’ve been bragging about, which usually they brag about right before the markets open. It’s usually right before the markets open that there’s a lot of good news, and then somehow the markets go up. And then over the course of a couple of days, we find out that it was all BS. It turns out that that’s all BS because what’s going to happen is that they’re not going to want to strike this horrible deal, according to Scott Jennings’s top level sources. And that means that the deal is not going to be struck, and the war is going to go on, quite sadly, actually.”

“The President has exactly two choices. He can pay Iran to open the Strait, or he can suffer the indignity of continuing this quagmire longer and longer. And because I listen to the Scott Jennings radio show religiously, I know that the White House has no intention of paying them to open up the Strait. A senior administration official told Scott Jennings exclusively, you should check it out, that they’re only going to pay them at the end of the process, not at the beginning of the process. The Iranians, by the way, are not going to go for that.” “That means this deal that they’ve been bragging about, which usually they brag about right before the markets open. It’s usually right before the markets open that there’s a lot of good news, and then somehow the markets go up. And then over the course of a couple of days, we find out that it was all BS. It turns out that that’s all BS because what’s going to happen is that they’re not going to want to strike this horrible deal, according to Scott Jennings’s top level sources. And that means that the deal is not going to be struck, and the war is going to go on, quite sadly, actually.”

Josh Rogin

595,582 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Scott Jennings: “I just want to go back to 9/11 for a second. The idea that the United States had it coming. Is insane.” Keith Boykin: “Never said that. Don’t put words in my mouth.” Scott Jennings: “You literally invoked it… You said that we did something and that caused it.” “We’re going to roll the tape later and everybody’s going to see.” NUKED!

Scott Jennings: “I just want to go back to 9/11 for a second. The idea that the United States had it coming. Is insane.” Keith Boykin: “Never said that. Don’t put words in my mouth.” Scott Jennings: “You literally invoked it… You said that we did something and that caused it.” “We’re going to roll the tape later and everybody’s going to see.” NUKED!

RedWave Press

206,041 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Scott Jennings STUNS Ana Navarro and lib CNN panel after exposing that Epstein colluded with Democrats to harm Trump JENNINGS: Does your concern apply to STACEY PLASKETT (D), member of Congress? NAVARRO: Can you just hear me?! JENNINGS: Should she resign? NAVARRO: There you go again! JENNINGS: She was being PROGRAMMED by him after the moment you said we all knew. PHILLIP: Why not apply that same logic to everyone? JENNINGS: What REPUBLICAN was Epstein programming? PHILLIP: Listen, hold on. You're you're basically saying if you're named in these documents. I guess you're saying that they should be condemned! You're making a carve-out for Trump. JENNINGS: There's NO evidence that Trump had any contact with Epstein after he excommunicated him. But we DO have evidence that he was programming Democrat members of Congress! Why isn't that a big DEAL to you guys? PHILLIP: We just don't know! JENNINGS: We DO know that! We absolutely know he was programming Plaskett. Scott never misses 🔥🔥🔥 Share and Follow:Trust In Trump

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Scott Jennings STUNS Ana Navarro and lib CNN panel after exposing that Epstein colluded with Democrats to harm Trump JENNINGS: Does your concern apply to STACEY PLASKETT (D), member of Congress? NAVARRO: Can you just hear me?! JENNINGS: Should she resign? NAVARRO: There you go again! JENNINGS: She was being PROGRAMMED by him after the moment you said we all knew. PHILLIP: Why not apply that same logic to everyone? JENNINGS: What REPUBLICAN was Epstein programming? PHILLIP: Listen, hold on. You're you're basically saying if you're named in these documents. I guess you're saying that they should be condemned! You're making a carve-out for Trump. JENNINGS: There's NO evidence that Trump had any contact with Epstein after he excommunicated him. But we DO have evidence that he was programming Democrat members of Congress! Why isn't that a big DEAL to you guys? PHILLIP: We just don't know! JENNINGS: We DO know that! We absolutely know he was programming Plaskett. Scott never misses 🔥🔥🔥 Share and Follow:Trust In Trump

Trust In Trump

183,370 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Scott Jennings: “You're leaving out the critical piece, which is, according to some reporting and according to the president, the document flatly states Iran will not have a nuclear weapon.” CNN’s Abby Phillip: “That's what the JCPOA says.” Scott Jennings: “There's literally no teeth to enforce it.” Abby Phillip: “In the plain text of the JCPOA, it says Iran will not pursue a nuclear weapon.” Scott Jennings: “But they did.” Abby Phillip: “This document, as far as we know, says that it reiterates what it has always said, which is that they have been saying for many, many years that they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon… So, then why do you believe it now?” Scott Jennings: “Well, I believe it now because, A, we bombed the ever-living crap out of their uranium enrichment facilities last summer. And, B, we now have something that no one's ever had, this amazing coalition of Arab states in the Gulf working with us to keep on top of the Iranians to keep it from ever happening. To me, that is the critical thing that is new…”

Scott Jennings: “You're leaving out the critical piece, which is, according to some reporting and according to the president, the document flatly states Iran will not have a nuclear weapon.” CNN’s Abby Phillip: “That's what the JCPOA says.” Scott Jennings: “There's literally no teeth to enforce it.” Abby Phillip: “In the plain text of the JCPOA, it says Iran will not pursue a nuclear weapon.” Scott Jennings: “But they did.” Abby Phillip: “This document, as far as we know, says that it reiterates what it has always said, which is that they have been saying for many, many years that they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon… So, then why do you believe it now?” Scott Jennings: “Well, I believe it now because, A, we bombed the ever-living crap out of their uranium enrichment facilities last summer. And, B, we now have something that no one's ever had, this amazing coalition of Arab states in the Gulf working with us to keep on top of the Iranians to keep it from ever happening. To me, that is the critical thing that is new…”

RedWave Press

524,591 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I think really the best solution is Ukrainian membership in NATO and the idea of creating security in Europe by having Ukraine as a kind of buffer zone between Russia and nato countries. It just failed. That is the reality. It failed. So we don't need to have such a buffer. We need Ukraine to be inside NATO. Unfortunately, now we see that nato leaders and, first of all, the United States are not ready for this. But I think that will come CNN

I think really the best solution is Ukrainian membership in NATO and the idea of creating security in Europe by having Ukraine as a kind of buffer zone between Russia and nato countries. It just failed. That is the reality. It failed. So we don't need to have such a buffer. We need Ukraine to be inside NATO. Unfortunately, now we see that nato leaders and, first of all, the United States are not ready for this. But I think that will come CNN

Oleksiy Goncharenko

11,685 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Scott Jennings STUNS Ana Navarro and lib CNN panel after exposing that Epstein colluded with Democrats to harm Trump JENNINGS: Does your concern apply to STACEY PLASKETT (D), member of Congress? NAVARRO: Can you just hear me?! JENNINGS: Should she resign? NAVARRO: There you go again! JENNINGS: She was being PROGRAMMED by him after the moment you said we all knew. PHILLIP: Why not apply that same logic to everyone? JENNINGS: What REPUBLICAN was Epstein programming? PHILLIP: Listen, hold on. You're you're basically saying if you're named in these documents. I guess you're saying that they should be condemned! You're making a carve-out for Trump. JENNINGS: There's NO evidence that Trump had any contact with Epstein after he excommunicated him. But we DO have evidence that he was programming Democrat members of Congress! Why isn't that a big DEAL to you guys? PHILLIP: We just don't know! JENNINGS: We DO know that! We absolutely know he was programming Plaskett. Scott never misses 🔥🔥🔥

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Scott Jennings STUNS Ana Navarro and lib CNN panel after exposing that Epstein colluded with Democrats to harm Trump JENNINGS: Does your concern apply to STACEY PLASKETT (D), member of Congress? NAVARRO: Can you just hear me?! JENNINGS: Should she resign? NAVARRO: There you go again! JENNINGS: She was being PROGRAMMED by him after the moment you said we all knew. PHILLIP: Why not apply that same logic to everyone? JENNINGS: What REPUBLICAN was Epstein programming? PHILLIP: Listen, hold on. You're you're basically saying if you're named in these documents. I guess you're saying that they should be condemned! You're making a carve-out for Trump. JENNINGS: There's NO evidence that Trump had any contact with Epstein after he excommunicated him. But we DO have evidence that he was programming Democrat members of Congress! Why isn't that a big DEAL to you guys? PHILLIP: We just don't know! JENNINGS: We DO know that! We absolutely know he was programming Plaskett. Scott never misses 🔥🔥🔥

Eric Daugherty

956,995 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten