Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Scott Jennings on the Epstein Files: “I think they should release it. I think they should follow the law. I also have no idea how long it takes to prepare these many documents for this kind of release. The counselor may have some thoughts on that, but they should... show more

RedWave Press

239,278 subscribers

26,678 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Leigh McGowan to Scott Jennings on the Epstein files: 'Let's get our knickers in a twist' over child rape... Why are you talking like that? It's insane. If it brings down Democrats, bring them down. If it brings down Republicans, bring them down. Bring down princes, world leaders, Hollywood people.

Leigh McGowan to Scott Jennings on the Epstein files: 'Let's get our knickers in a twist' over child rape... Why are you talking like that? It's insane. If it brings down Democrats, bring them down. If it brings down Republicans, bring them down. Bring down princes, world leaders, Hollywood people.

Blue Georgia

182,924 views • 6 months ago

Jennings: Let's not get our knickers in a twist here McGowan: Why are you talking like that? It's insane. Your attitude is just horrifying….Everything that is in these files—it could bring an entire house down. And if it has to, it has to. If it brings down Democrats, bring them down. If it brings down Republicans, bring them down. Bring down princes, world leaders, Hollywood people, bring them down. But what it feels like right now is that there's a giant cabal of people that do not have to listen to the law

Jennings: Let's not get our knickers in a twist here McGowan: Why are you talking like that? It's insane. Your attitude is just horrifying….Everything that is in these files—it could bring an entire house down. And if it has to, it has to. If it brings down Democrats, bring them down. If it brings down Republicans, bring them down. Bring down princes, world leaders, Hollywood people, bring them down. But what it feels like right now is that there's a giant cabal of people that do not have to listen to the law

Acyn

4,077,747 views • 6 months ago

Reporter: Mr. President, why wait for congress to release the Epstein files? Why not just do it now? Trump: It's not the question that I mind. It's your attitude… I think the license should be taken away from ABC. We have a great commissioner, a chairman who should look at that.

Reporter: Mr. President, why wait for congress to release the Epstein files? Why not just do it now? Trump: It's not the question that I mind. It's your attitude… I think the license should be taken away from ABC. We have a great commissioner, a chairman who should look at that.

Acyn

2,394,185 views • 8 months ago

JUST IN: The brother of Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre calls out the Trump admin on their handling of the Epstein case, tells Trump to release the Epstein files. "I think that our government is safeguarding these documents. They have it locked away in this little Pandora's box..." "Let's get these Epstein files released so that we can go after these monsters properly."

JUST IN: The brother of Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre calls out the Trump admin on their handling of the Epstein case, tells Trump to release the Epstein files. "I think that our government is safeguarding these documents. They have it locked away in this little Pandora's box..." "Let's get these Epstein files released so that we can go after these monsters properly."

Collin Rugg

77,076 views • 9 months ago

PabloReports: Is it possible to get a special prosecutor for the Epstein files since they are not turning over these documents? McGovern: I’m all for it. We voted that these files be turned over, and this administration and the attorney general seem to be ignoring the law. They think the longer they stall, this will go away—but it’s not going away.

PabloReports: Is it possible to get a special prosecutor for the Epstein files since they are not turning over these documents? McGovern: I’m all for it. We voted that these files be turned over, and this administration and the attorney general seem to be ignoring the law. They think the longer they stall, this will go away—but it’s not going away.

Acyn

51,211 views • 4 months ago

🚨 NEW - Abby Phillip STRIKES AGAIN, saying ICE agents shouldn't wear masks because it's just a "risk" you have to deal with to be doxed, targeted and have your family attacked. Scott Jennings is having none of it. PHILLIP: That is a risk that every law enforcement officer in this country faces. JENNINGS: You think they SHOULD? PHILLIP: Other officers show their faces because they work for the people. That's a risk you take. JENNINGS: Yeah, well, I don't agree law enforcement in ANY agency should have to face the risk of their family being assaulted. PHILLIP: But the accountability piece of it can't be ignored! JENNINGS: Certain people in our community decided to take matters into their own hands. Democrat officials screaming 'they're the Gestapo!' What do you think that does to radicalize people? That is irresponsible, and it's not the fault of an ICE agent for that kind of rhetoric to be in our system! - Scott Jennings

🚨 NEW - Abby Phillip STRIKES AGAIN, saying ICE agents shouldn't wear masks because it's just a "risk" you have to deal with to be doxed, targeted and have your family attacked. Scott Jennings is having none of it. PHILLIP: That is a risk that every law enforcement officer in this country faces. JENNINGS: You think they SHOULD? PHILLIP: Other officers show their faces because they work for the people. That's a risk you take. JENNINGS: Yeah, well, I don't agree law enforcement in ANY agency should have to face the risk of their family being assaulted. PHILLIP: But the accountability piece of it can't be ignored! JENNINGS: Certain people in our community decided to take matters into their own hands. Democrat officials screaming 'they're the Gestapo!' What do you think that does to radicalize people? That is irresponsible, and it's not the fault of an ICE agent for that kind of rhetoric to be in our system! - Scott Jennings

Eric Daugherty

151,314 views • 11 months ago

Scott Jennings: “We have pummeled, pummeled their offensive capabilities. You know, we have destroyed nearly all of their air defenses. I mean, I think we are currently meeting our objectives.” Leigh McGowan: “What are our objectives?” Scott Jennings: “No nukes, no missiles and drones, no aggressive Navy, no exporting of terrorism.” Leigh McGowan: “Based on what.” Scott Jennings: “You don't think Iran is the largest state sponsor of terror, that they pursue nuclear weapons, that they have missiles and drones and they have an aggressive navy?”

Scott Jennings: “We have pummeled, pummeled their offensive capabilities. You know, we have destroyed nearly all of their air defenses. I mean, I think we are currently meeting our objectives.” Leigh McGowan: “What are our objectives?” Scott Jennings: “No nukes, no missiles and drones, no aggressive Navy, no exporting of terrorism.” Leigh McGowan: “Based on what.” Scott Jennings: “You don't think Iran is the largest state sponsor of terror, that they pursue nuclear weapons, that they have missiles and drones and they have an aggressive navy?”

RedWave Press

82,411 views • 4 months ago

Scanlon: We think that the administration should release these files. And it really is a little confusing, I think, on why suddenly our Republican colleagues are blocking this.

Scanlon: We think that the administration should release these files. And it really is a little confusing, I think, on why suddenly our Republican colleagues are blocking this.

Acyn

44,782 views • 1 year ago

.Scott Jennings on Kilmar Abrego Garcia: "Obviously, [ICE doesn't] disappear people. This is the most deportable illegal alien in the history of illegal aliens. Elie, is he in the country illegally?" Honig: "Yes he is." Jennings: "Okay. Number one. Number two, does he have an existing deportation order?" "Well, he did not. They got caught without one. They tried to." Jennings: "But he got -- he got one. They said he couldn't go to El Salvador. So let's admit a few things." Honig: "Right, there's a withholding order preventing him from." Jennings: "Let's admit a few things. They shouldn't have sent him to El Salvador. But they shouldn't sent him to El Salvador, okay? Admit it. Honig: "They should not have." Jennings: "This case. I don't care about. All I really care about. This guy's been living illegally in the United States for 13, 14, 15 years and take everything else out of it. How is it that our government, our bureaucracy, our justice system, our sovereign nation cannot get rid of a single deportable, illegal alien for 15 years? It's crazy." Abby Phillip: "I don't think that's really about -- I don't really think that's about the law. I think that's really about the incompetence of the process"

.Scott Jennings on Kilmar Abrego Garcia: "Obviously, [ICE doesn't] disappear people. This is the most deportable illegal alien in the history of illegal aliens. Elie, is he in the country illegally?" Honig: "Yes he is." Jennings: "Okay. Number one. Number two, does he have an existing deportation order?" "Well, he did not. They got caught without one. They tried to." Jennings: "But he got -- he got one. They said he couldn't go to El Salvador. So let's admit a few things." Honig: "Right, there's a withholding order preventing him from." Jennings: "Let's admit a few things. They shouldn't have sent him to El Salvador. But they shouldn't sent him to El Salvador, okay? Admit it. Honig: "They should not have." Jennings: "This case. I don't care about. All I really care about. This guy's been living illegally in the United States for 13, 14, 15 years and take everything else out of it. How is it that our government, our bureaucracy, our justice system, our sovereign nation cannot get rid of a single deportable, illegal alien for 15 years? It's crazy." Abby Phillip: "I don't think that's really about -- I don't really think that's about the law. I think that's really about the incompetence of the process"

Curtis Houck

202,567 views • 7 months ago

Scott Jennings: “The catering to the Somali community that goes on by the Democrats in Minnesota is a little weird, is it not? They got the lieutenant governor up there dressed like the handmaid's tail.” “Why do they cater to them? It's such a small portion of the population. Democrats put them at the center of everything.” Abby Phillip: “I don't think it would be acceptable for you to make a statement like that about Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn.” “Why on earth is it acceptable to make a statement like that about people —” Scott Jennings: “It's a white liberal woman dressing in [a hijab].” Abby Phillip: “You’re denigrating the religious practices of a group for no reason...” Scott Jennings: “She's not religious.” I honestly have no idea how Scott puts up with this woman.

Scott Jennings: “The catering to the Somali community that goes on by the Democrats in Minnesota is a little weird, is it not? They got the lieutenant governor up there dressed like the handmaid's tail.” “Why do they cater to them? It's such a small portion of the population. Democrats put them at the center of everything.” Abby Phillip: “I don't think it would be acceptable for you to make a statement like that about Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn.” “Why on earth is it acceptable to make a statement like that about people —” Scott Jennings: “It's a white liberal woman dressing in [a hijab].” Abby Phillip: “You’re denigrating the religious practices of a group for no reason...” Scott Jennings: “She's not religious.” I honestly have no idea how Scott puts up with this woman.

RedWave Press

274,815 views • 7 months ago

The View whines that Knicks owner James Dolan accepted an invitation to have the team visit the White House: SARA HAINES: I think this puts the players in a really precarious position. Merely because Jim Dolan is admittedly a good friend of Donald Trump's. And to now put that on the players, your boss, the owner of the team you play for is extending this offer, accepting this offer. I don't - I know you might get people that refuse to go. I just think it's not fair to take any of the flowers and beauty of this moment and its unity and try to then place it on the players' back. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: I totally agree. I think it puts the players in such an uncomfortable position, cause it was honestly the first thing I thought of once they won the championship, as a new Knicks fan, is like, "Oh no, they're going to get invited to the White House and there's this political discourse. Should they go, shout they not?" I think they should go if they want to. If they're comfortable going, because the White House is bigger than any one president and precedency. HAINES: It's our house. FARAH GRIFFIN: They earned the right to go as champions, but I also think they have the right to refuse too. If any individual players don't want to, that's their decision. And I also they can use the big platforms they have. I mean, these guys all have millions of followers on social media. If they want to stand up for causes or if they want to potentially critique this administration, there's a way that everyone should win. I don't think it's fair if they do decide to go, I don't think they should get hate it. It's there place to.

The View whines that Knicks owner James Dolan accepted an invitation to have the team visit the White House: SARA HAINES: I think this puts the players in a really precarious position. Merely because Jim Dolan is admittedly a good friend of Donald Trump's. And to now put that on the players, your boss, the owner of the team you play for is extending this offer, accepting this offer. I don't - I know you might get people that refuse to go. I just think it's not fair to take any of the flowers and beauty of this moment and its unity and try to then place it on the players' back. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: I totally agree. I think it puts the players in such an uncomfortable position, cause it was honestly the first thing I thought of once they won the championship, as a new Knicks fan, is like, "Oh no, they're going to get invited to the White House and there's this political discourse. Should they go, shout they not?" I think they should go if they want to. If they're comfortable going, because the White House is bigger than any one president and precedency. HAINES: It's our house. FARAH GRIFFIN: They earned the right to go as champions, but I also think they have the right to refuse too. If any individual players don't want to, that's their decision. And I also they can use the big platforms they have. I mean, these guys all have millions of followers on social media. If they want to stand up for causes or if they want to potentially critique this administration, there's a way that everyone should win. I don't think it's fair if they do decide to go, I don't think they should get hate it. It's there place to.

Nicholas Fondacaro

67,122 views • 1 month ago

Lee: It is a gross abuse of our ability to conduct oversight. They are essentially spying on us as we are looking through and trying to do any sort of investigation and bring about transparency regarding these Epstein files. I think that is really problematic for that reason — that they are spying on members of Congress who are doing their job. Also, why should we have to do this at the end of the day? These files shouldn’t have been redacted in that way in the first place. They’ve redacted the names of people who perpetrated heinous crimes. These are some of the most powerful people — potentially — but we don’t know because they still won’t release the names. Yet they unredacted the names and images of survivors. None of this would have been a problem if they had done their job in the first place. I do want to remind people that the Epstein Transparency Act is one of the things that compels them to release the files. Also, our subpoena from back in August compels them to release the full, complete, unredacted files — except for the names or identifying information of survivors, which should be coming to our committee. There is no reason why they haven’t yet released the final 3 million or so documents. They’re saying the Epstein Transparency Act is the reason why, but our subpoena does not contain that loophole. So we still expect the rest of the files. We expect that the executive branch will not trample on the legislative branch’s ability to do our job. And I just think it’s funny that Pam Bondi had so much energy today in that hearing, all while she is protecting pedophiles.

Lee: It is a gross abuse of our ability to conduct oversight. They are essentially spying on us as we are looking through and trying to do any sort of investigation and bring about transparency regarding these Epstein files. I think that is really problematic for that reason — that they are spying on members of Congress who are doing their job. Also, why should we have to do this at the end of the day? These files shouldn’t have been redacted in that way in the first place. They’ve redacted the names of people who perpetrated heinous crimes. These are some of the most powerful people — potentially — but we don’t know because they still won’t release the names. Yet they unredacted the names and images of survivors. None of this would have been a problem if they had done their job in the first place. I do want to remind people that the Epstein Transparency Act is one of the things that compels them to release the files. Also, our subpoena from back in August compels them to release the full, complete, unredacted files — except for the names or identifying information of survivors, which should be coming to our committee. There is no reason why they haven’t yet released the final 3 million or so documents. They’re saying the Epstein Transparency Act is the reason why, but our subpoena does not contain that loophole. So we still expect the rest of the files. We expect that the executive branch will not trample on the legislative branch’s ability to do our job. And I just think it’s funny that Pam Bondi had so much energy today in that hearing, all while she is protecting pedophiles.

Acyn

46,887 views • 5 months ago

Paul Mecurio: “ For some people, having guys with masks and no cameras and very aggressive tactics and at times not having a search warrant scares people.” Scott Jennings: “What is she afraid of? … If you do not like a federal law, if you do not like the way a federal law is being enforced, what we do in this country is call our congressman, call our legislators and say, let's change the law, let's change the policies. What we do not do is drive our cars into and over the people who are simply there enforcing the laws that are on the books.” Paul Mecurio: “What about protests?” Scott Jennings: “I have no problem with protests. That's not protest. That is impeding federal law enforcement. Again, it's a perfectly legitimate political discussion.” Paul Mecurio: “She wasn't impeding because they could get around.” These leftists are disgusting, sick individuals.

Paul Mecurio: “ For some people, having guys with masks and no cameras and very aggressive tactics and at times not having a search warrant scares people.” Scott Jennings: “What is she afraid of? … If you do not like a federal law, if you do not like the way a federal law is being enforced, what we do in this country is call our congressman, call our legislators and say, let's change the law, let's change the policies. What we do not do is drive our cars into and over the people who are simply there enforcing the laws that are on the books.” Paul Mecurio: “What about protests?” Scott Jennings: “I have no problem with protests. That's not protest. That is impeding federal law enforcement. Again, it's a perfectly legitimate political discussion.” Paul Mecurio: “She wasn't impeding because they could get around.” These leftists are disgusting, sick individuals.

RedWave Press

497,036 views • 6 months ago

"Liverpool have got to be ruthless about this - and so they should...They should look for stability but I think it's a bit nuanced here. The elephant in the room that's Xabi..." "I demand of FSG, if they don't think he's gonna do it then get someone in who's going to because it's club first. Nothing personal." 🎥 The Anfield Wrap | Peloton

"Liverpool have got to be ruthless about this - and so they should...They should look for stability but I think it's a bit nuanced here. The elephant in the room that's Xabi..." "I demand of FSG, if they don't think he's gonna do it then get someone in who's going to because it's club first. Nothing personal." 🎥 The Anfield Wrap | Peloton

The Anfield Wrap

82,270 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk: I'm not completely libertarian. I just think it should be harder to establish a rule than to remove it. “I'm not completely libertarian in the sense I don't think there should be regulations at all. I just think that the natural bias of regulations is to last forever. You have to actively delete a regulation or a law, the way things are set up in most laws. Some laws have sunset provisions. And the problem with that is you get vested interests who like that law, and there's an inertia around it. And so over time, the body of law and regulations grows and grows and grows. It is something that I think is not ultimately good for society. So, in fact, I think it would generally be a good idea to have it such that it's hard to establish a rule and easy to remove one.” Montana Job Summit, September 16, 2013

Elon Musk: I'm not completely libertarian. I just think it should be harder to establish a rule than to remove it. “I'm not completely libertarian in the sense I don't think there should be regulations at all. I just think that the natural bias of regulations is to last forever. You have to actively delete a regulation or a law, the way things are set up in most laws. Some laws have sunset provisions. And the problem with that is you get vested interests who like that law, and there's an inertia around it. And so over time, the body of law and regulations grows and grows and grows. It is something that I think is not ultimately good for society. So, in fact, I think it would generally be a good idea to have it such that it's hard to establish a rule and easy to remove one.” Montana Job Summit, September 16, 2013

ELON CLIPS

51,729 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk: It should be harder to establish a rule than to remove it. “I'm not completely libertarian in the sense I don't think there should be regulations at all. I just think that the natural bias of regulations is to last forever. You have to actively delete a regulation or a law, the way things are set up in most laws. Some laws have sunset provisions. And the problem with that is you get vested interests who like that law, and there's an inertia around it. And so over time, the body of law and regulations grows and grows and grows. It is something that I think is not ultimately good for society. So, in fact, I think it would generally be a good idea to have it such that it's hard to establish a rule and easy to remove one.” Montana Job Summit, September 16, 2013

Elon Musk: It should be harder to establish a rule than to remove it. “I'm not completely libertarian in the sense I don't think there should be regulations at all. I just think that the natural bias of regulations is to last forever. You have to actively delete a regulation or a law, the way things are set up in most laws. Some laws have sunset provisions. And the problem with that is you get vested interests who like that law, and there's an inertia around it. And so over time, the body of law and regulations grows and grows and grows. It is something that I think is not ultimately good for society. So, in fact, I think it would generally be a good idea to have it such that it's hard to establish a rule and easy to remove one.” Montana Job Summit, September 16, 2013

ELON CLIPS

32,677 views • 10 months ago

Collins: But it's against federal law for people who are here illegally to get healthcare Johnson: Yes. And that's why our reforms are so important to enforce all that. Collins: I didn’t see that in the democratic proposal that people who are here illegally should get healthcare. Johnson: Because they don’t have the level of specification that we have Collins: But you see my point? Johnson: No

Collins: But it's against federal law for people who are here illegally to get healthcare Johnson: Yes. And that's why our reforms are so important to enforce all that. Collins: I didn’t see that in the democratic proposal that people who are here illegally should get healthcare. Johnson: Because they don’t have the level of specification that we have Collins: But you see my point? Johnson: No

Acyn

755,290 views • 10 months ago

Arteta on the players battling a physical strain: “Yes, but when I see them track back, when we lose the ball and the habits that they have, it's just amazing. That's why I know what they are doing, these players. There is a reason why we are the only English team in the competition, because this league and this schedule takes the hell out of you and it's very difficult to do what we've done. “We are not perfect, we need to improve things, that's for sure, we recognise that, but let's value what these players have done because they deserve it.”

Arteta on the players battling a physical strain: “Yes, but when I see them track back, when we lose the ball and the habits that they have, it's just amazing. That's why I know what they are doing, these players. There is a reason why we are the only English team in the competition, because this league and this schedule takes the hell out of you and it's very difficult to do what we've done. “We are not perfect, we need to improve things, that's for sure, we recognise that, but let's value what these players have done because they deserve it.”

Connor Humm

55,160 views • 3 months ago