Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

SCOTUS’ current race-based redistricting tests under VRA Section 2 are not a good fit for how we vote in 2025 in America. Using race may also very well violate equal protection under the law, assuming that how people are voting MUST be governed by race, as opposed to entirely... show more

AAGHarmeetDhillon

170,235 subscribers

57,382 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that Louisiana’s congressional map relied too heavily on race in drawing a majority-Black district, reaffirming that political districts cannot be primarily race-based. For many Freedmen Black Americans, this is a shift toward accountability… not political control. We are not political property. We are not guaranteed votes. And we should not be boxed into poverty-stricken communities through race-based political engineering. Real representation must be earned through competition… not assumed through identity. #Chicagoflipsred

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that Louisiana’s congressional map relied too heavily on race in drawing a majority-Black district, reaffirming that political districts cannot be primarily race-based. For many Freedmen Black Americans, this is a shift toward accountability… not political control. We are not political property. We are not guaranteed votes. And we should not be boxed into poverty-stricken communities through race-based political engineering. Real representation must be earned through competition… not assumed through identity. #Chicagoflipsred

Chicago Flips Red

44,218 views • 3 months ago

Election shyster Marc Elias is big mad abt SCOTUS fixing the Voting Rights Act. He thought race-based districts were a permanent gift to the Dems. Nope. There can be no permanent discrimination, only fixes limited in time for a specific wrong. The VRA passed in 1965 and 60 years is a long time. Chief Justice Roberts said it perfectly: "The only way to stop racial discrimination is to stop discriminating by race." The signature and vital victories of the Civil Rights movement now need to comport with the 14th Amendment and Equal Protection under the law. That means the Dems have to treat Black people equally and recognize they have agency. There has been no institutional racism in the country since the 70s and the mythical Systemic Racism they invented falls apart under simple scrutiny. In the college admissions case Roberts wrote an opinion that said a cure as severe using racial discrimination to remedy a previous wrong had to eventually end. "[E]nshrining a permanent justification for racial preferences,’ the Court explained, ‘would offend this fundamental equal protection principle.’” And it does offend the Equal Protection Clause and decent people everywhere. Time to have one set of rules for everyone.

Election shyster Marc Elias is big mad abt SCOTUS fixing the Voting Rights Act. He thought race-based districts were a permanent gift to the Dems. Nope. There can be no permanent discrimination, only fixes limited in time for a specific wrong. The VRA passed in 1965 and 60 years is a long time. Chief Justice Roberts said it perfectly: "The only way to stop racial discrimination is to stop discriminating by race." The signature and vital victories of the Civil Rights movement now need to comport with the 14th Amendment and Equal Protection under the law. That means the Dems have to treat Black people equally and recognize they have agency. There has been no institutional racism in the country since the 70s and the mythical Systemic Racism they invented falls apart under simple scrutiny. In the college admissions case Roberts wrote an opinion that said a cure as severe using racial discrimination to remedy a previous wrong had to eventually end. "[E]nshrining a permanent justification for racial preferences,’ the Court explained, ‘would offend this fundamental equal protection principle.’” And it does offend the Equal Protection Clause and decent people everywhere. Time to have one set of rules for everyone.

Jim Hanson

55,479 views • 3 months ago

Voting based on race This man being interviewed says you can’t vote for white people just because they’re white. You can’t vote based on race He’s asked who he’s voting for in the Los Angeles mayor race He says “Nithya Raman because she's Indian and I'm South Asian” I guess you can’t vote by race only if it’s for white people…… This is the foreigner mentality, it’s always voting based on race There is substantial data to show these people vote by race Stanford Law Review study of 80,000+ respondents found voters of all groups express higher approval and support for candidates sharing their race and ethnicity. Blacks and Hispanics show strong in-group support But white people do not vote like this, Whites show only a modest preference for White candidates even after controlling for party Indian Americans show notable co-ethnic voter mobilization. Research indicates they are particularly more inclined to support candidates sharing their ethnicity Multiculturalism doesn’t work. The will only vote for eachother and turn our country into where they came from

Voting based on race This man being interviewed says you can’t vote for white people just because they’re white. You can’t vote based on race He’s asked who he’s voting for in the Los Angeles mayor race He says “Nithya Raman because she's Indian and I'm South Asian” I guess you can’t vote by race only if it’s for white people…… This is the foreigner mentality, it’s always voting based on race There is substantial data to show these people vote by race Stanford Law Review study of 80,000+ respondents found voters of all groups express higher approval and support for candidates sharing their race and ethnicity. Blacks and Hispanics show strong in-group support But white people do not vote like this, Whites show only a modest preference for White candidates even after controlling for party Indian Americans show notable co-ethnic voter mobilization. Research indicates they are particularly more inclined to support candidates sharing their ethnicity Multiculturalism doesn’t work. The will only vote for eachother and turn our country into where they came from

Wall Street Apes

43,350 views • 2 months ago

Former Google design ethicist Tristan Harris gives 2 warnings that we must consider during the AI race against China: "Be aware that the AI companies are using that narrative to drive up THEIR goals and drive up investment into their products so that they can win against their competitors." "What are we in a race for? ... We're actually in a race for who is better at STEERING and wielding the technology in a way that strengthens your society."

Former Google design ethicist Tristan Harris gives 2 warnings that we must consider during the AI race against China: "Be aware that the AI companies are using that narrative to drive up THEIR goals and drive up investment into their products so that they can win against their competitors." "What are we in a race for? ... We're actually in a race for who is better at STEERING and wielding the technology in a way that strengthens your society."

Glenn Beck

26,530 views • 4 months ago

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

Steve Guest

115,581 views • 3 months ago

With respect to the argument over whether Darlington was good or overhyped, I thought Mark Martin put it best before(!) the race yesterday. "My excitement for today is to see how hard it is and to witness greatness. My fear is, sometimes when you have that, it might not be as entertaining. "And I just hope that everyone embraces the race today as, hey, not every race is Atlanta, not every race is Talladega. And this is what it is. It may be an incredible finish to this race, or it may not be. We may see greatness separated by not so much greatness, I don't know. "I wouldn't want every race to be anything. I think we need a variety. And I'm excited about this particular race with less downforce."

With respect to the argument over whether Darlington was good or overhyped, I thought Mark Martin put it best before(!) the race yesterday. "My excitement for today is to see how hard it is and to witness greatness. My fear is, sometimes when you have that, it might not be as entertaining. "And I just hope that everyone embraces the race today as, hey, not every race is Atlanta, not every race is Talladega. And this is what it is. It may be an incredible finish to this race, or it may not be. We may see greatness separated by not so much greatness, I don't know. "I wouldn't want every race to be anything. I think we need a variety. And I'm excited about this particular race with less downforce."

Steven Taranto

141,350 views • 4 months ago

TRUTH NUKE: Scott Jennings “Well, it's an interesting proposition you raised that [minorities are] not represented [in Congress]. There are 58 members of the House who are black. It's a record, actually. A majority are actually elected from plurality white districts. We're still a racist in America. You've got white people electing African Americans to Congress in record numbers.” “The issue is racism. It is inherently racist to draw lines and divide people up by race. I mean, the definition of it would be we're going to divide ourselves up by race and say only a black congressman can represent black people, only a Hispanic congressman can represent Hispanic people. That is patently illegal under U.S. law.” “It also makes no sense when you consider that we're all Americans and we can vote for whoever we want. And often, according to the statistics, we do.” Nailed it!

TRUTH NUKE: Scott Jennings “Well, it's an interesting proposition you raised that [minorities are] not represented [in Congress]. There are 58 members of the House who are black. It's a record, actually. A majority are actually elected from plurality white districts. We're still a racist in America. You've got white people electing African Americans to Congress in record numbers.” “The issue is racism. It is inherently racist to draw lines and divide people up by race. I mean, the definition of it would be we're going to divide ourselves up by race and say only a black congressman can represent black people, only a Hispanic congressman can represent Hispanic people. That is patently illegal under U.S. law.” “It also makes no sense when you consider that we're all Americans and we can vote for whoever we want. And often, according to the statistics, we do.” Nailed it!

RedWave Press

397,635 views • 3 months ago

As Thomas Sowell said: “Racism is not dead, but it is on life support — kept alive by politicians, race hustlers, and people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as ‘racists.’” Should skin color determine your vote in 2026? The entire American experiment was built on the opposite idea. The Declaration established a revolutionary principle for its time: that all men are created equal and possess equal rights under God. America didn’t always live up to that standard, but each generation has fought to bring it closer to reality. An enlightened society should reject the idea that race determines political identity. Progressives want to keep that antiquated narrative alive. Conservatives want to promote an enlightened society. The difference here could not be more clear. The left wants to live in the past. Conservatives want to begin our future.

As Thomas Sowell said: “Racism is not dead, but it is on life support — kept alive by politicians, race hustlers, and people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as ‘racists.’” Should skin color determine your vote in 2026? The entire American experiment was built on the opposite idea. The Declaration established a revolutionary principle for its time: that all men are created equal and possess equal rights under God. America didn’t always live up to that standard, but each generation has fought to bring it closer to reality. An enlightened society should reject the idea that race determines political identity. Progressives want to keep that antiquated narrative alive. Conservatives want to promote an enlightened society. The difference here could not be more clear. The left wants to live in the past. Conservatives want to begin our future.

Dan Crenshaw

35,375 views • 3 months ago

If you're frustrated over not knowing who moved on to the runoff in the California governor's race and the L.A. mayor's race, you’re not alone. It may be another week until we get final results. Election officials say it takes longer to count the votes because of how many different ways there are to vote.

If you're frustrated over not knowing who moved on to the runoff in the California governor's race and the L.A. mayor's race, you’re not alone. It may be another week until we get final results. Election officials say it takes longer to count the votes because of how many different ways there are to vote.

ABC7 Eyewitness News

18,204 views • 2 months ago

You can't overstate how demoralized the libs are by the SCOTUS Calais decision. Janai Nelson, who argued for racial gerrymandering before the Court, says it is "a day of devastation for our democracy" "We have lost the most important tool to protect our democracy from race discrimination and voting, outside of the 15th Amendment"

You can't overstate how demoralized the libs are by the SCOTUS Calais decision. Janai Nelson, who argued for racial gerrymandering before the Court, says it is "a day of devastation for our democracy" "We have lost the most important tool to protect our democracy from race discrimination and voting, outside of the 15th Amendment"

Breitbart News

96,543 views • 3 months ago

It’s unfair to be falsely suspected of a crime because of your race. But it’s also unfair to be labeled racist for trying to stay safe when crime statistics show some groups are overrepresented. Good and bad people exist in every race. The right approach is to judge people by their actions, not by the color of their skin.

It’s unfair to be falsely suspected of a crime because of your race. But it’s also unfair to be labeled racist for trying to stay safe when crime statistics show some groups are overrepresented. Good and bad people exist in every race. The right approach is to judge people by their actions, not by the color of their skin.

Taya

21,831 views • 7 months ago

“It’s time to get back to the basic constitutional principles of this country, where we don’t allow these types of overtly racist picking and choosing winners and losers based on skin color. It doesn’t work.” Oversight Project President Mike Howell reacts to the news that the Supreme Court may be overturning section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which mandates race consideration in congressional redistricting maps.

“It’s time to get back to the basic constitutional principles of this country, where we don’t allow these types of overtly racist picking and choosing winners and losers based on skin color. It doesn’t work.” Oversight Project President Mike Howell reacts to the news that the Supreme Court may be overturning section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which mandates race consideration in congressional redistricting maps.

One America News

77,850 views • 10 months ago

Dividing people based on race is how David Eby won last time. I believe we are all equal. When we defend our principles - equality for all - we can stand proud and demonstrate to British Columbians that we are ready to govern. I'm ready to defeat David Eby and the NDP. Let’s get B.C. back on track.

Dividing people based on race is how David Eby won last time. I believe we are all equal. When we defend our principles - equality for all - we can stand proud and demonstrate to British Columbians that we are ready to govern. I'm ready to defeat David Eby and the NDP. Let’s get B.C. back on track.

Iain Black

121,749 views • 3 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas takes a BLOW TORCH to Voting Rights Act districts that favor Democrats on the basis of race Thomas successfully makes the point that the "black" district WOULD NOT EXIST in Louisiana without being forced to by the courts to consider race. Louisiana's Solicitor General says that they would not have drawn up the district without being forced to draw it under SB 8. THOMAS: "What role did Robinson [forced Louisiana to draw another race district] play in SB 8? [Louisiana's map]" AGUINAGA: We drew it because the courts told us to! We'd NEVER pass SB 8 without Robinson! They said a majority black district was required. And our legislature saw the marching order. Clarence Thomas is the GOAT! He knows the VRA is ridiculous!

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas takes a BLOW TORCH to Voting Rights Act districts that favor Democrats on the basis of race Thomas successfully makes the point that the "black" district WOULD NOT EXIST in Louisiana without being forced to by the courts to consider race. Louisiana's Solicitor General says that they would not have drawn up the district without being forced to draw it under SB 8. THOMAS: "What role did Robinson [forced Louisiana to draw another race district] play in SB 8? [Louisiana's map]" AGUINAGA: We drew it because the courts told us to! We'd NEVER pass SB 8 without Robinson! They said a majority black district was required. And our legislature saw the marching order. Clarence Thomas is the GOAT! He knows the VRA is ridiculous!

Eric Daugherty

1,123,453 views • 10 months ago

"Given the gravity of the crises that we are facing as a country...do you have regret about progressives not using the opportunity to do the same thing back in 2021?" MUST WATCH interview with Ro Khanna today about force the vote & the speakership race.

"Given the gravity of the crises that we are facing as a country...do you have regret about progressives not using the opportunity to do the same thing back in 2021?" MUST WATCH interview with Ro Khanna today about force the vote & the speakership race.

Briahna Joy Gray

215,839 views • 3 years ago

School districts, such as LAUSD, that allocate more funds to certain areas based on race are acting illegally. Under Attorney General Pamela Bondi, DOJ Civil Rights Division will not allow any citizen in our country to be discriminated against in the distribution of government benefits!

School districts, such as LAUSD, that allocate more funds to certain areas based on race are acting illegally. Under Attorney General Pamela Bondi, DOJ Civil Rights Division will not allow any citizen in our country to be discriminated against in the distribution of government benefits!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

43,170 views • 5 months ago

Harmeet Dhillon Says The Supreme Court Is Set To STRIKE DOWN Racial Gerrymandering Under The Voting Rights Act. "Among the first cases issued by the court of this term is going to be striking down the racial gerrymandering that previously the court has said was mandated under the Voting Rights Act." "If everyone has to compete for all the votes, which I think is frankly the American way, people are going to scramble. We will have a fairer regime where we are not segregating people based on race. Such an outdated and repugnant and un-American concept."

Harmeet Dhillon Says The Supreme Court Is Set To STRIKE DOWN Racial Gerrymandering Under The Voting Rights Act. "Among the first cases issued by the court of this term is going to be striking down the racial gerrymandering that previously the court has said was mandated under the Voting Rights Act." "If everyone has to compete for all the votes, which I think is frankly the American way, people are going to scramble. We will have a fairer regime where we are not segregating people based on race. Such an outdated and repugnant and un-American concept."

Benny Johnson

102,149 views • 8 months ago