Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Sean Penn supported “Skala.” This unit is known for the fact that several dozen people who were conscripted off the streets have already died there. They are beaten, beaten to death, and raped. Many of the bodies have been found to bear signs of horrific torture and gangrene of...

40,260 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We are praying for this nation. We're people of the Book, and the Book tells us to pray for our leaders, even if we don't agree with them. And Trump is one of our leaders. He was a president. And Joe Biden is one of our leaders. He is the current sitting president. There aren’t many things that President Biden does that I agree with, but it is my job to pray for him anyway. And certainly to not bring him harm. I can disagree with him and still honor the office and still honor the person. And certainly not engage in any kind of stupidity like some of the rhetoric that has gone on in the last 48 hours—and really has gone on for the last several years. Some of you are really too serious about what happens in the White House. If you'd concentrate half as much on what happens in your house, you’d be in a whole lot better shape. That's really the common denominator of success. It hasn't got anything to do with those guys up there. Yes, they do some things that affect our lives, but I've had several of them try to ruin my life, and they hadn't pulled it off. And I've had several of them try to make my life better, and they haven’t pulled that off. I'm old, and I've seen presidents that were going to be the end of democracy, and they weren't. And I've seen presidents that were going to be the second coming of Jesus, and they were not even close. I think the problem is that the level of anger has to do with the expectations of what the office can provide. Treat these people like people—they have families, they have children, they have friends. I've got friends who are congressmen, friends who are senators, and the stuff that they have to put up with… Some of you are just out of control, and you should not spend your money on Financial Peace University—You should spend it on counseling. Concentrate on fighting for or against ideas. When you have to vilify or destroy a person because you disagree with their idea, you've already lost the argument, because you've lost the high ground. You don't have to destroy people for your idea to win.

Dave Ramsey

213,276 views • 2 years ago

This Remote Viewer Just Dropped a BOMBSHELL Warning of an UNEXPECTED Future U.S. President Change?! Edward Riordan was tasked to look at the future president of 2030 and the data that came back was surprising: "...the idea here is of a new leader stepping in. The person is ripe for the time and timing, feeding off of the angst of the people. This feels like a major shift. But why? I had to wonder. This person will come to power and signify a new phase has begun. This feels future based. Like this plan is being arranged and the person is being groomed now." "...Not not too far out. There seems to be more prep for the individual and the situation that is needed, but I had to wonder what kind of situation are we talking about here? And it seemed crisis based, like someone is brought down in this person is brought in...." "...it feels like a large shift in the structure of things in order out of chaos scenario like Venezuela, a chaotic environment that is being orchestrated into order." "...This person, this person is being presented for this time to the people and the world to see.... But here was this person. They were on a stage, but they didn't have a face. It was very, very strange. They didn't even have a they didn't have a face for some reason." "...It's like the death of a king or a ruler. The country stops. The world stops for a moment. An example would be if something happened to President Trump, the world would stop for a moment. This level of magnitude, the people don't know what to do next." "...Taking advantage of a heightened emotional state to push propaganda and a narrative, this person steps in at a high emotion period with a strong sense of filling someone's shoes or replacing them, possibly due to a death...."

Future Forecasting Group

64,699 views • 4 months ago

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”

RedWave Press

419,627 views • 5 months ago