正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨🇺🇸 🇦🇫 SEC. RUBIO ADMITS AFGHAN VETTING IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE: "INFORMATION SIMPLY DOESN'T EXIST" Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the Trump administration has slowed down Afghan refugee admissions despite pressure to accelerate the process, revealing fundamental limitations in the government's ability to properly vet evacuees from Afghanistan: "We've...

37,106 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The reason these tragedies, perpetrated by Afghan biorefuse, continue to happen throughout the west is because our government refuses to normalize relations with the government of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (i.e. The Taliban) The war in Afghanistan ended in August 2021 when the Taliban liberated Kabul. At that time, the Biden Administration implemented Operation Allies Welcome letting in nearly 75,000 Afghans under the false pretense that, by working with the US Military, these people were in danger of reprisals from the Islamic Emirate. Those reprisals never came, and in that time we imported the absolute dregs of Afghan society. Imagine what scum you have to be to be a born and bred Afghan, born and raised in Afghanistan, see a foreign occupying military force invade, and decide to collaborate with them. Is it any surprise that the people then come to the west and unleash all kinds of havoc? There is no greater scum than the person that sells out his land and his people to be a collaborationist traitor. Because western governments continue to treat the IEA as a pariah state, these people have a legal pretext upon which to claim asylum despite the fact that there have been no reprisals and the war has been over for nearly 5 years. In April of 2025, the Trump administration ended temporary protected status for roughly 15,000 of Afghan imported. This issue is not limited to the Biden Administration. All of these people need to be stripped of their visas, denaturalized and deported. Normalizing relations with the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is an AMERICA FIRST, PRO WESTERN position and is the legal basis for sending them all back.

BasilianThought

76,348 次观看 • 8 个月前

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”

RedWave Press

419,610 次观看 • 4 个月前

Matt Damon participated in Howard Zinn's great "The People Speak" series, and read out a great speech by Zinn about the importance of civil disobedience, which is as apt today as when he first wrote it in 1970: "I start from the supposition that the world is topsy-turvy, that things are all wrong, that the wrong people are in jail, and the wrong people are out of jail. That the wrong people are in power, and the wrong people are out of power. I start from the supposition that all we have to do is think about the state of the world today, and realize that things are all upside down. If you don't think, if you listen to TV, read scholarly things, you actually begin to think that things are not so bad. Or that just little things are wrong. But you have to get a little detached, and then come back and look at the world, and you are horrified. So we have to start from that supposition—that things are really topsy-turvy. And our topic is topsy-turvy: civil disobedience. As soon as you say the topic is civil disobedience, you are saying our problem is civil disobedience. That is not our problem…. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is the numbers of people all over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. And our problem is that scene in All Quiet on the Western Front where the schoolboys march off dutifully in a line to war. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world, in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem."

☀️👀

297,607 次观看 • 1 年前