Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Security guarantees is the central reasons this war occurred in the first place. An Article 5 type one makes Ukraine a de facto NATO member. This is unacceptable for Russia and an instant dealbreaker. Only one with loose, non-legal, binding rhetoric…1/2

MJ

37,189 subscribers

227,348 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Stoltenberg: Ukraine can't become a full NATO member now because Article 5 would immediately put NATO at war with Russia But any new deal cannot become “Minsk III” that only delays the next Russian aggression. The best future security guarantee for Ukraine is NATO membership. 1/

Stoltenberg: Ukraine can't become a full NATO member now because Article 5 would immediately put NATO at war with Russia But any new deal cannot become “Minsk III” that only delays the next Russian aggression. The best future security guarantee for Ukraine is NATO membership. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

26,558 views • 7 days ago

Security guarantees for Ukraine can only be integrated into a final peace agreement. But Europe pushes for one in a Ceasefire which is impossible. Also they want NATO forces in Ukraine as part of the security guarantee, which is also non negotiable…1/2

Security guarantees for Ukraine can only be integrated into a final peace agreement. But Europe pushes for one in a Ceasefire which is impossible. Also they want NATO forces in Ukraine as part of the security guarantee, which is also non negotiable…1/2

MJ

144,864 views • 11 months ago

🇺🇦🇺🇸 ZELENSKY: “U.S. READY TO BE PART OF SECURITY GUARANTEES FOR UKRAINE” “We have reached, together with all our partners, an important understanding with the U.S. The U.S. is ready to be part of the security guarantees for Ukraine. This is the first time we have achieved such readiness. These must be guarantees ‘Article 5 Like,’ that is, like NATO’s fifth article on defense. And these are real, effective security guarantees.” Source: Clash report

🇺🇦🇺🇸 ZELENSKY: “U.S. READY TO BE PART OF SECURITY GUARANTEES FOR UKRAINE” “We have reached, together with all our partners, an important understanding with the U.S. The U.S. is ready to be part of the security guarantees for Ukraine. This is the first time we have achieved such readiness. These must be guarantees ‘Article 5 Like,’ that is, like NATO’s fifth article on defense. And these are real, effective security guarantees.” Source: Clash report

Mario Nawfal

106,062 views • 11 months ago

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

Igor Kyivskyi

226,429 views • 2 years ago

US frontline medic in Ukraine: NATO is not ready for the war with Russia. I’m a bit terrified. No one ever prepared for the war like this. I think NATO forces must learn something from the Ukrainians. 1/

US frontline medic in Ukraine: NATO is not ready for the war with Russia. I’m a bit terrified. No one ever prepared for the war like this. I think NATO forces must learn something from the Ukrainians. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

19,978 views • 5 months ago

There will only be losers in the Ukraine War. Russia will achieve an ugly victory (not total). Then the war ends as a frozen conflict with rump Ukraine with Europe’s backing on one side and Greater Russia on the other. This will begin a new Cold War…1/2

There will only be losers in the Ukraine War. Russia will achieve an ugly victory (not total). Then the war ends as a frozen conflict with rump Ukraine with Europe’s backing on one side and Greater Russia on the other. This will begin a new Cold War…1/2

MJ

433,647 views • 8 months ago

HE (RUBIO) DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS TRUE OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN POLICY ESTABLISHMENT IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT FOR RUSSIA, THIS IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT. THE POSSIBILITY OF UKRAINE BECOMING A MEMBER OF NATO IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE TO THE RUSSIANS. IT IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT, AND THEY ARE NOT GONNA STOP UNTIL UKRAINE AND THE WEST ARE DEFEATED AND THEY BOTH ACCEPT THE FACT THAT UKRAINE HAS TO BE A NEUTRAL STATE, NUMBER ONE, AND IT HAS TO BE DISARMED TO THE POINT OFFENSIVE THREAT TO RUSSIA. - John Mearsheimer

HE (RUBIO) DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS TRUE OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN POLICY ESTABLISHMENT IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT FOR RUSSIA, THIS IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT. THE POSSIBILITY OF UKRAINE BECOMING A MEMBER OF NATO IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE TO THE RUSSIANS. IT IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT, AND THEY ARE NOT GONNA STOP UNTIL UKRAINE AND THE WEST ARE DEFEATED AND THEY BOTH ACCEPT THE FACT THAT UKRAINE HAS TO BE A NEUTRAL STATE, NUMBER ONE, AND IT HAS TO BE DISARMED TO THE POINT OFFENSIVE THREAT TO RUSSIA. - John Mearsheimer

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

54,393 views • 10 months ago

[Russia violates its own statements. Again.] Putin 2002: Ukraine is a sovereign state, they choose their allies. It’s decision of Ukraine and NATO. I have nothing against it. Lavrov 2025: One of the reasons for the war in Ukraine is that NATO broke its non-expansion promises.

[Russia violates its own statements. Again.] Putin 2002: Ukraine is a sovereign state, they choose their allies. It’s decision of Ukraine and NATO. I have nothing against it. Lavrov 2025: One of the reasons for the war in Ukraine is that NATO broke its non-expansion promises.

Tymofiy Mylovanov

66,062 views • 1 year ago

Peskov: ❗️"NATO is at war with Russia; this is obvious and requires no further proof. NATO is de facto involved in this war. NATO provides both indirect and direct support to the Kyiv regime. Therefore, it can be said with absolute certainty that NATO is at war with Russia."

Peskov: ❗️"NATO is at war with Russia; this is obvious and requires no further proof. NATO is de facto involved in this war. NATO provides both indirect and direct support to the Kyiv regime. Therefore, it can be said with absolute certainty that NATO is at war with Russia."

Anton Gerashchenko

302,833 views • 11 months ago

The U.S. and Europe’s involvement in support of Ukraine have evolved far beyond a proxy war. We’re de facto at war against Russia given how deeply involved they are. That means the entire West is an enemy of Russia and Ukraine is the center of a Great…1/2

The U.S. and Europe’s involvement in support of Ukraine have evolved far beyond a proxy war. We’re de facto at war against Russia given how deeply involved they are. That means the entire West is an enemy of Russia and Ukraine is the center of a Great…1/2

MJ

99,806 views • 8 months ago

DE-FACTO CONTROL OF RUSSIA? THIS IS WHAT NATO WANTS... "What NATO is offering is a peace fire...keep seizing the assets. But what Russia wants is an agreement that Ukraine will not join NATO." @mikebenzcyber Jack Poso 🇺🇸

DE-FACTO CONTROL OF RUSSIA? THIS IS WHAT NATO WANTS... "What NATO is offering is a peace fire...keep seizing the assets. But what Russia wants is an agreement that Ukraine will not join NATO." @mikebenzcyber Jack Poso 🇺🇸

Real America's Voice (RAV)

37,051 views • 1 year ago

The UK’s Defence Minister says the UK is ready to put boots on the ground in Ukraine to enforce a ceasefire 1. This is a non-starter and NATO troops in Ukraine would be unacceptable for Russia 2. We speak for most of the world when we say this…WHO ASKED YOU? 😂

The UK’s Defence Minister says the UK is ready to put boots on the ground in Ukraine to enforce a ceasefire 1. This is a non-starter and NATO troops in Ukraine would be unacceptable for Russia 2. We speak for most of the world when we say this…WHO ASKED YOU? 😂

Going Underground

64,824 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BREAKING: Trump envoy Steve Witkoff just announced that to get a peace deal with Russia, the US and European countries, instead of giving Ukraine NATO membership, can offer them Article 5-like protections...a strong security guarantee. Zelensky - please don't F this up. "We got to an agreement that the U.S. and other European nations could effectively offer Article 5-like language for security guarantees."

🚨 BREAKING: Trump envoy Steve Witkoff just announced that to get a peace deal with Russia, the US and European countries, instead of giving Ukraine NATO membership, can offer them Article 5-like protections...a strong security guarantee. Zelensky - please don't F this up. "We got to an agreement that the U.S. and other European nations could effectively offer Article 5-like language for security guarantees."

Eric Daugherty

966,111 views • 1 year ago

Former Denmark PM and NATO Secretary General, Rasmussen: The most effective and cheapest way to guarantee security of Ukraine is to invite Ukraine to join NATO. Ukraine is a provider of European security, the strongest and most battle-tested military power in Europe right now. There might be arguments about how we can deal with a new member that is at war with Russia. But we have a precedent: when we allowed Germany into NATO back in 1955, the whole of Germany formally joined NATO, yet we decided that only the territory controlled by the government in Western Germany was covered by Article 5. We could do exactly the same with Ukraine and say: “You join NATO and Article 5 only covers that part of Ukraine controlled by the government in Kyiv.”

Former Denmark PM and NATO Secretary General, Rasmussen: The most effective and cheapest way to guarantee security of Ukraine is to invite Ukraine to join NATO. Ukraine is a provider of European security, the strongest and most battle-tested military power in Europe right now. There might be arguments about how we can deal with a new member that is at war with Russia. But we have a precedent: when we allowed Germany into NATO back in 1955, the whole of Germany formally joined NATO, yet we decided that only the territory controlled by the government in Western Germany was covered by Article 5. We could do exactly the same with Ukraine and say: “You join NATO and Article 5 only covers that part of Ukraine controlled by the government in Kyiv.”

Kate from Kharkiv

21,899 views • 2 months ago

The Biggest Threat in the World is NATO NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS NATO Has Been Encircling Russia Since the Nineties The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War Ukraine Was Becoming a de FACTO Member of NATO Putin said, quote, "We are categorically opposed to Ukraine joining NATO because this poses a threat to us, and we have arguments to support hall." He then made it clear that he recognized that Ukraine was becoming a de FACTO member of NATO. The United States and its allies, he said, quote, "Continue to pump the current Kiev authorities full of modern types of weapons." End of quote. He went on to say that if this was not stopped, Moscow, quote, "Would be left with an anti-Russia armed-to-the-teeth. This is totally unacceptable." Putin's logic should be manifestly clear to Americans in the audience who have long understood, I'm sure, that we have a Monroe Doctrine, which stipulates that no great power is allowed to place any of its military forces in the Western hemisphere.

The Biggest Threat in the World is NATO NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS NATO Has Been Encircling Russia Since the Nineties The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War Ukraine Was Becoming a de FACTO Member of NATO Putin said, quote, "We are categorically opposed to Ukraine joining NATO because this poses a threat to us, and we have arguments to support hall." He then made it clear that he recognized that Ukraine was becoming a de FACTO member of NATO. The United States and its allies, he said, quote, "Continue to pump the current Kiev authorities full of modern types of weapons." End of quote. He went on to say that if this was not stopped, Moscow, quote, "Would be left with an anti-Russia armed-to-the-teeth. This is totally unacceptable." Putin's logic should be manifestly clear to Americans in the audience who have long understood, I'm sure, that we have a Monroe Doctrine, which stipulates that no great power is allowed to place any of its military forces in the Western hemisphere.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

38,092 views • 11 months ago

Ukraine is going to be European, become a member of the EU, and join NATO - Finnish President Alexander Stubb "What were Russia's strategic aims in this war? One was to deny Ukraine's independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity. Failure. Number one: Ukraine is going to be European. It's going to become an EU member state and, eventually, a NATO member state."

Ukraine is going to be European, become a member of the EU, and join NATO - Finnish President Alexander Stubb "What were Russia's strategic aims in this war? One was to deny Ukraine's independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity. Failure. Number one: Ukraine is going to be European. It's going to become an EU member state and, eventually, a NATO member state."

Anton Gerashchenko

142,477 views • 1 month ago

President Macron: When we speak about security guarantees, we speak about the whole security of the European continent and this is why we are all united here with Ukraine on this matter... And in order to have such a long-standing peace for Ukraine and for the whole continent, we do need the security guarantees. And the first one is clearly a credible Ukrainian army for the years and decades to come. And the second one is our own commitments, all of us. You can be sure that Europeans are very lucid about the fact that they have their fair share in the security guarantees for Ukraine, but their own security is clearly at stake in this situation.

President Macron: When we speak about security guarantees, we speak about the whole security of the European continent and this is why we are all united here with Ukraine on this matter... And in order to have such a long-standing peace for Ukraine and for the whole continent, we do need the security guarantees. And the first one is clearly a credible Ukrainian army for the years and decades to come. And the second one is our own commitments, all of us. You can be sure that Europeans are very lucid about the fact that they have their fair share in the security guarantees for Ukraine, but their own security is clearly at stake in this situation.

Anton Gerashchenko

287,043 views • 1 year ago

This war and the threat posed by Russia is not only an existential threat to Ukraine, but a major challenge to the security we value so greatly. Ireland stands with Ukraine now and into the future.

This war and the threat posed by Russia is not only an existential threat to Ukraine, but a major challenge to the security we value so greatly. Ireland stands with Ukraine now and into the future.

Micheál Martin

31,026 views • 9 months ago

An aggressive Russia is a threat not only to Ukraine but to all of us. By securing Ukraine’s victory and providing Ukraine with solid security guarantees, we ensure the security of Europe as well.

An aggressive Russia is a threat not only to Ukraine but to all of us. By securing Ukraine’s victory and providing Ukraine with solid security guarantees, we ensure the security of Europe as well.

Margus Tsahkna

33,860 views • 9 months ago

Jared Kushner says he's still only "technically" serving in a "volunteer" capacity, but at the same time he's administering the governance of Gaza, organizing Article 5-style "security guarantees" for Ukraine, and handling the Iran war. What an incredible "volunteer" portfolio!

Jared Kushner says he's still only "technically" serving in a "volunteer" capacity, but at the same time he's administering the governance of Gaza, organizing Article 5-style "security guarantees" for Ukraine, and handling the Iran war. What an incredible "volunteer" portfolio!

Michael Tracey

415,954 views • 4 months ago