Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨 SECURITY WARNED. NO.10 IGNORED. STARMER OWNED THIS. 🚨 This is no longer speculation. This is confirmed reporting. According to Sky News, UK security services explicitly raised concerns about appointing Peter Mandelson as U.S. Ambassador. Those concerns were formally flagged. They were escalated. They were known. And yet Downing... Street pressed ahead anyway. This is the moment **Keir Starmer’s premiership becomes untenable. Let’s be absolutely clear about what this means: • Security services warned about Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein • They insist they did their job and “ran it up the flagpole” • Number 10 overrode the warnings for political reasons • The appointment then collapsed in public disgrace • Mandelson was fired only after the exposure became impossible to contain This wasn’t an intelligence failure. It was a political decision. Sky’s reporting raises devastating questions: Who in No.10 made the final call? Why were security warnings dismissed? Did Starmer know — or was he shielded by his own Chief of Staff? If he did know, why did he proceed? If he didn’t, why is he not in control of his own government? Either scenario is catastrophic. The security services are now openly dismayed — not because they failed, but because they’re being blamed after being ignored. Meanwhile, MPs are described as “slack-jawed” at a Downing Street operation that has lost two senior figures in a week and defended Mandelson even after Epstein links were public — only to reverse course hours later. This is not a minor scandal. This is judgment failure at the very top of government. A Prime Minister who ignores security advice on sensitive diplomatic appointments —or who allows his inner circle to do so— cannot be trusted with the national interest. Starmer now owns this decision. He owns the override. He owns the consequences. And Britain is entitled to ask: If security warnings can be brushed aside this easily, who is really running the country?show more

Jim Ferguson

430,303 subscribers

85,588 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Юмор Новости и политика Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 STARMER ADVISED — AND IGNORED IT This just escalated. According to Sky News, the Prime Minister was explicitly advised to complete security vetting before appointing Peter Mandelson. That advice came from Simon Case. It was not followed. Now the defence is: “I wasn’t told he failed vetting.” But the bigger question is now unavoidable: Why was the appointment pushed through without clearance in the first place? This shifts everything. From a breakdown in communication… to a decision at the top. All eyes now on Keir Starmer in the Commons.

🚨 STARMER ADVISED — AND IGNORED IT This just escalated. According to Sky News, the Prime Minister was explicitly advised to complete security vetting before appointing Peter Mandelson. That advice came from Simon Case. It was not followed. Now the defence is: “I wasn’t told he failed vetting.” But the bigger question is now unavoidable: Why was the appointment pushed through without clearance in the first place? This shifts everything. From a breakdown in communication… to a decision at the top. All eyes now on Keir Starmer in the Commons.

Jim Ferguson

24,788 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 SECURITY BREACH AT THE TOP — GOVERNMENT IN CHAOS The Prime Minister was not informed that a key ambassadorial appointment had FAILED security vetting. Let that sink in. A senior diplomatic role… A failed clearance… And Downing Street didn’t know. Now the fallout begins: The Foreign Office’s top civil servant is OUT. Senior MPs are openly furious. And inside Westminster, the language is turning toxic: “Something smells…” “Stretches credibility to breaking point…” “Could be terminal…” This is no longer a minor oversight. This is a breakdown in the chain of command at the highest level of government. Because if the Prime Minister isn’t being told critical security information…or was he? Who is in control? And what else isn’t being disclosed? With elections just weeks away, pressure is building fast. Calls for resignation are no longer whispers. They’re getting louder.

🚨 SECURITY BREACH AT THE TOP — GOVERNMENT IN CHAOS The Prime Minister was not informed that a key ambassadorial appointment had FAILED security vetting. Let that sink in. A senior diplomatic role… A failed clearance… And Downing Street didn’t know. Now the fallout begins: The Foreign Office’s top civil servant is OUT. Senior MPs are openly furious. And inside Westminster, the language is turning toxic: “Something smells…” “Stretches credibility to breaking point…” “Could be terminal…” This is no longer a minor oversight. This is a breakdown in the chain of command at the highest level of government. Because if the Prime Minister isn’t being told critical security information…or was he? Who is in control? And what else isn’t being disclosed? With elections just weeks away, pressure is building fast. Calls for resignation are no longer whispers. They’re getting louder.

Jim Ferguson

36,470 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Keir Starmer clearly flustered at #PMQs Kemi Badenoch, "We know there will be a cover because this implicates Keir Starmer and his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney" "Who is a protege of Peter Mandelson" "The Prime Minister chose to inject Mandelson's poison into the heart of his government on the advice of Morgan McSweeney" "His catastrophic lack of judgment, telling us now that he did know, has harmed the special relationship, it has endangered National Security, compromised our diplomacy, and it has embarrassed our nation" "After all of this, does he have the same full confidence in Morgan McSweeney that he had in Peter Mandelson" Keir Starmer, "Morgan McSweeney is a central part of my team, he helped me change the Labour party and win an election" "Of course I have confidence in him"

Keir Starmer clearly flustered at #PMQs Kemi Badenoch, "We know there will be a cover because this implicates Keir Starmer and his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney" "Who is a protege of Peter Mandelson" "The Prime Minister chose to inject Mandelson's poison into the heart of his government on the advice of Morgan McSweeney" "His catastrophic lack of judgment, telling us now that he did know, has harmed the special relationship, it has endangered National Security, compromised our diplomacy, and it has embarrassed our nation" "After all of this, does he have the same full confidence in Morgan McSweeney that he had in Peter Mandelson" Keir Starmer, "Morgan McSweeney is a central part of my team, he helped me change the Labour party and win an election" "Of course I have confidence in him"

Farrukh

132,815 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 🧵 BOMBSHELL. Holy… After initially refusing to answer twice. After a 3rd question (5:11 below) Keir Starmer has CONFESSED he was made aware of Peter Mandelson's ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein at the time he appointed him US ambassador. Starmer then goes on to keep saying that Mandelson lied to him. So… he just took his word for it. With no thorough investigation (bar an obviously feeble attempt by the security committee, as Kemi said, it was in Google) and then made him Ambassador to the United States? And then spoke highly of him TWICE at the Dispatch box? Even though he now admits that he was made aware of the relationship. It’s also EXTREMELY concerning to National Security that the Security committee also just… took Mandelson’s word for it. Again, as Kemi said, it was on bloody google! All in all, the fact Starmer has now confessed he knew about the relationship between Mandelson and Epstein post-Epstein conviction and pre-appointment of Mandelson to Ambassodor is SHOCKING All details MUST be released to the public immediately. There MUST be a public I have also added two other questions on Mandelson/Epstein in the thread below by Ed Davey and another MP that I think are also important in my opinion.

🚨 🧵 BOMBSHELL. Holy… After initially refusing to answer twice. After a 3rd question (5:11 below) Keir Starmer has CONFESSED he was made aware of Peter Mandelson's ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein at the time he appointed him US ambassador. Starmer then goes on to keep saying that Mandelson lied to him. So… he just took his word for it. With no thorough investigation (bar an obviously feeble attempt by the security committee, as Kemi said, it was in Google) and then made him Ambassador to the United States? And then spoke highly of him TWICE at the Dispatch box? Even though he now admits that he was made aware of the relationship. It’s also EXTREMELY concerning to National Security that the Security committee also just… took Mandelson’s word for it. Again, as Kemi said, it was on bloody google! All in all, the fact Starmer has now confessed he knew about the relationship between Mandelson and Epstein post-Epstein conviction and pre-appointment of Mandelson to Ambassodor is SHOCKING All details MUST be released to the public immediately. There MUST be a public I have also added two other questions on Mandelson/Epstein in the thread below by Ed Davey and another MP that I think are also important in my opinion.

Kosher

32,064 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This MUST be the end….Keir Starmer, in fact the whole government should not be able to survive this. Not content with blatantly lying when they claimed they did not know the extent of Mandelsons relationship with Epstein, it now turns out that he FAILED the security vetting. The government claim that Starmer and in fact NO ministers were aware that he failed the vetting and that some mysterious “officials” in the foreign office overruled the failed vetting and passed him anyway. How believeable is that….not even slightly. Would some civil servant or lowly MP sign off on the most important diplomatic appointment in the country without even consulting their political bosses….and if they did it means our so called elected representatives are not in charge and not running the country. Either way they MUST GO. Either Starmer or the foreign secretary at the time of both must resign tomorrow.

This MUST be the end….Keir Starmer, in fact the whole government should not be able to survive this. Not content with blatantly lying when they claimed they did not know the extent of Mandelsons relationship with Epstein, it now turns out that he FAILED the security vetting. The government claim that Starmer and in fact NO ministers were aware that he failed the vetting and that some mysterious “officials” in the foreign office overruled the failed vetting and passed him anyway. How believeable is that….not even slightly. Would some civil servant or lowly MP sign off on the most important diplomatic appointment in the country without even consulting their political bosses….and if they did it means our so called elected representatives are not in charge and not running the country. Either way they MUST GO. Either Starmer or the foreign secretary at the time of both must resign tomorrow.

John Hannam

22,783 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I say to the Government: no more evasions, no more excuses, and no more terminal inexactitude from that Dispatch Box. The House deserves better. The country expects better. This was an appointment that should never have been made. The Government pushed the Peter Mandelson appointment through anyway, and now they are scrambling for excuses. They say the system failed. It did not. They ignored it. The facts were already in the public domain. The Cabinet Secretary advised them to pause and wait for proper clearance. Sensible advice. Responsible advice. They ignored that too. Instead, they rushed it through, put the King in the firing line, secured agrément, and hoped it would hold. It did not. That is not due process, that is recklessness. And today we learned something even more serious: despite not being cleared, he had access to highly sensitive material. That should concern every Member of this House. So the question is simple: why? Why push this through against the evidence, against advice, and against common sense? The Prime Minister owns this. This was his decision, and it has failed.

I say to the Government: no more evasions, no more excuses, and no more terminal inexactitude from that Dispatch Box. The House deserves better. The country expects better. This was an appointment that should never have been made. The Government pushed the Peter Mandelson appointment through anyway, and now they are scrambling for excuses. They say the system failed. It did not. They ignored it. The facts were already in the public domain. The Cabinet Secretary advised them to pause and wait for proper clearance. Sensible advice. Responsible advice. They ignored that too. Instead, they rushed it through, put the King in the firing line, secured agrément, and hoped it would hold. It did not. That is not due process, that is recklessness. And today we learned something even more serious: despite not being cleared, he had access to highly sensitive material. That should concern every Member of this House. So the question is simple: why? Why push this through against the evidence, against advice, and against common sense? The Prime Minister owns this. This was his decision, and it has failed.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

60,962 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 THE WARNINGS WERE IGNORED. NOW PEOPLE ARE DEAD. “The Jewish community is furious and devastated.” Those aren’t activist words. They’re the words of grief — and rage — after months of ignored warnings. For over a year, Jewish leaders, security officials, and even Australia’s own intelligence chief warned that a terror attack was inevitable. They pleaded for protection. They begged for action. They were dismissed. An official antisemitism report was delivered to the Prime Minister four months ago. It was never implemented. A national antisemitism summit produced concrete recommendations. They were ignored. Meanwhile, hatred escalated in plain sight — on streets, on campuses, online — unchecked. Now a Jewish Hanukkah event is attacked. Families. Children. Elderly. Targeted deliberately. Methodically. With rifles. With intent. With no escape plan. This was not random violence. This was predictable failure. And the fury you’re hearing now is not political theatre. It is the sound of a community realising it was left exposed — despite repeated warnings — by those sworn to protect it. History will ask a simple question: Why was nothing done when everything was known?

🚨 THE WARNINGS WERE IGNORED. NOW PEOPLE ARE DEAD. “The Jewish community is furious and devastated.” Those aren’t activist words. They’re the words of grief — and rage — after months of ignored warnings. For over a year, Jewish leaders, security officials, and even Australia’s own intelligence chief warned that a terror attack was inevitable. They pleaded for protection. They begged for action. They were dismissed. An official antisemitism report was delivered to the Prime Minister four months ago. It was never implemented. A national antisemitism summit produced concrete recommendations. They were ignored. Meanwhile, hatred escalated in plain sight — on streets, on campuses, online — unchecked. Now a Jewish Hanukkah event is attacked. Families. Children. Elderly. Targeted deliberately. Methodically. With rifles. With intent. With no escape plan. This was not random violence. This was predictable failure. And the fury you’re hearing now is not political theatre. It is the sound of a community realising it was left exposed — despite repeated warnings — by those sworn to protect it. History will ask a simple question: Why was nothing done when everything was known?

Jim Ferguson

178,629 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨🇬🇧 Top UK Politicians today on TV talking about a Conspiracy "Why's that Conspiracy? What Conspiracy?" "We're drifting into Conspiracy" Why? Because Keir Starmer appointed the 'Prince of Darkness' aka Peter Mandelson and then lied about his knowledge & extent of the relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Now after an inquest Government phones are now miraculously getting lost & stolen (Including Starmers Chief of Staff McSweeney who was also Mentored by Mandelson) into what was know in connection to Mandelson, Starmer, & Epstein. Conspiracies are simply coincidences - and this is another obvious cover-up.

🚨🇬🇧 Top UK Politicians today on TV talking about a Conspiracy "Why's that Conspiracy? What Conspiracy?" "We're drifting into Conspiracy" Why? Because Keir Starmer appointed the 'Prince of Darkness' aka Peter Mandelson and then lied about his knowledge & extent of the relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Now after an inquest Government phones are now miraculously getting lost & stolen (Including Starmers Chief of Staff McSweeney who was also Mentored by Mandelson) into what was know in connection to Mandelson, Starmer, & Epstein. Conspiracies are simply coincidences - and this is another obvious cover-up.

Concerned Citizen

17,443 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

#Migrant #Arrested #Charged #Remanded!! Last year, women and families in Southampton stood up and protested because they were concerned about their safety. They were intimidated, silenced, mocked, and accused of overreacting for daring to speak out. Today, those warnings have been realised. An Ethiopian national housed at the very hotel they were protesting about has been charged and remanded in custody for a serious sexual assault on a female staff member. This is not racism. This is not hysteria. This is not speculation. This is a real victim, a real crime, and a real danger that was repeatedly flagged and deliberately ignored. When legitimate concerns are dismissed for political convenience, it is women who suffer the consequences. When communities are told to stay quiet, harm is allowed to happen. This is exactly what people were warning about and it will not be the last if nothing changes. #OperationOverlord 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

#Migrant #Arrested #Charged #Remanded!! Last year, women and families in Southampton stood up and protested because they were concerned about their safety. They were intimidated, silenced, mocked, and accused of overreacting for daring to speak out. Today, those warnings have been realised. An Ethiopian national housed at the very hotel they were protesting about has been charged and remanded in custody for a serious sexual assault on a female staff member. This is not racism. This is not hysteria. This is not speculation. This is a real victim, a real crime, and a real danger that was repeatedly flagged and deliberately ignored. When legitimate concerns are dismissed for political convenience, it is women who suffer the consequences. When communities are told to stay quiet, harm is allowed to happen. This is exactly what people were warning about and it will not be the last if nothing changes. #OperationOverlord 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

Danny Tommo

12,427 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Speaking in the Standards in Public Life statement today. Everything is about the Prime Minister’s judgment right now, and this looks a lot like smoke to me. The concerns surrounding Lord Mandelson were not hidden; they were well known through years of public discussion. He was dismissed twice from Government office for impropriety. He later appeared on Mr Deripaska’s yacht at a time when the European Union was deliberating on aluminium taxation; again raising serious questions of propriety. All of this leads to a simple and unavoidable question: why him? We are told the vetting was insufficient, yet it need not have been had proper diligence been undertaken. Ultimately, this comes back to the Prime Minister’s personal judgment, his decision to override the warning signs and determine, for reasons known only to himself, that this individual should represent the United Kingdom as ambassador to the United States. That is the central issue before us, and it is one that demands clear answers.

Speaking in the Standards in Public Life statement today. Everything is about the Prime Minister’s judgment right now, and this looks a lot like smoke to me. The concerns surrounding Lord Mandelson were not hidden; they were well known through years of public discussion. He was dismissed twice from Government office for impropriety. He later appeared on Mr Deripaska’s yacht at a time when the European Union was deliberating on aluminium taxation; again raising serious questions of propriety. All of this leads to a simple and unavoidable question: why him? We are told the vetting was insufficient, yet it need not have been had proper diligence been undertaken. Ultimately, this comes back to the Prime Minister’s personal judgment, his decision to override the warning signs and determine, for reasons known only to himself, that this individual should represent the United Kingdom as ambassador to the United States. That is the central issue before us, and it is one that demands clear answers.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

32,797 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Linus Kaikai: Security forces saluting the body of Raila Odinga is ironic. The man lying there has had a checkered history and a very difficult relationship with the security services in Kenya. He was not well treated at all by them. A lot of them were prepared in a manner to say this is your enemy; that is the relationship Raila has had with the security forces for a long time. Let this be a reminder to the security forces that as Kenyans, we are equal

Linus Kaikai: Security forces saluting the body of Raila Odinga is ironic. The man lying there has had a checkered history and a very difficult relationship with the security services in Kenya. He was not well treated at all by them. A lot of them were prepared in a manner to say this is your enemy; that is the relationship Raila has had with the security forces for a long time. Let this be a reminder to the security forces that as Kenyans, we are equal

Citizen TV Kenya

243,625 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Stephen Flynn, "The most important truth in this entire process is the Prime Minister of the UK chose to ignore the victims of Jeffrey Epstein" "When he made the political choice to put Peter Mandelson in as the UK's most senior diplomat, in the USA" "We have since seen Mandelson be investigated for misconduct in public office and we have of course no learned through the media that he failed the security vetting" "The PM blames all of this on the judgment of others" "But I'm interested in his judgment" "Does he believe himself to be gullible, incompetent, or both"

Stephen Flynn, "The most important truth in this entire process is the Prime Minister of the UK chose to ignore the victims of Jeffrey Epstein" "When he made the political choice to put Peter Mandelson in as the UK's most senior diplomat, in the USA" "We have since seen Mandelson be investigated for misconduct in public office and we have of course no learned through the media that he failed the security vetting" "The PM blames all of this on the judgment of others" "But I'm interested in his judgment" "Does he believe himself to be gullible, incompetent, or both"

Farrukh

41,334 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨SKY NEWS PUTS STARMER ON THE SPOT AND CALLS OUT HIS BS: “WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU ON MANDELSON VETTING SCANDAL!” 🤯 Starmer’s Furious Act Over Mandelson Vetting Scandal Falls Flat 🤨 Sky News put Keir Starmer firmly on the spot over the Peter Mandelson ambassador scandal. Prime Minister once again doing his best “I’m innocent and I’m FURIOUS” impression over the Mandelson scandal. Yeah course you are Keir, we believe you 🙃 The man is out here claiming it’s “unforgivable” and “staggering” that he wasn’t told Mandelson failed security vetting. Oh please. Does he really believe he’s convincing ANYONE that he didn’t know? He’s delusional! Of course he f*cking knew! Sky News basically said it to his face: “Are you really expecting us to believe that a senior civil servant, off his own back, without any sort of direction about the importance of Peter Mandelson being Ambassador, unilaterally overruled security vetting to approve a political appointment?” Starmer’s nervous robot response? Just repeated the same line like a broken record: “I was not told that he had failed security vetting. No minister or No 10 was told…” The reporter put it to him that he’s been prime minister for 2 years now and it sounds like he doesn’t have a grip on his government, but the robot just kept glitching, repeating the exact same talking points. He knows he’s lying, we know he’s lying, and he knows we know he’s lying. 🤥

🚨SKY NEWS PUTS STARMER ON THE SPOT AND CALLS OUT HIS BS: “WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU ON MANDELSON VETTING SCANDAL!” 🤯 Starmer’s Furious Act Over Mandelson Vetting Scandal Falls Flat 🤨 Sky News put Keir Starmer firmly on the spot over the Peter Mandelson ambassador scandal. Prime Minister once again doing his best “I’m innocent and I’m FURIOUS” impression over the Mandelson scandal. Yeah course you are Keir, we believe you 🙃 The man is out here claiming it’s “unforgivable” and “staggering” that he wasn’t told Mandelson failed security vetting. Oh please. Does he really believe he’s convincing ANYONE that he didn’t know? He’s delusional! Of course he f*cking knew! Sky News basically said it to his face: “Are you really expecting us to believe that a senior civil servant, off his own back, without any sort of direction about the importance of Peter Mandelson being Ambassador, unilaterally overruled security vetting to approve a political appointment?” Starmer’s nervous robot response? Just repeated the same line like a broken record: “I was not told that he had failed security vetting. No minister or No 10 was told…” The reporter put it to him that he’s been prime minister for 2 years now and it sounds like he doesn’t have a grip on his government, but the robot just kept glitching, repeating the exact same talking points. He knows he’s lying, we know he’s lying, and he knows we know he’s lying. 🤥

J Stewart

152,161 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This is important. Someone in the crowd confessed to the shooting immediately after it happened, despite not having a weapon? Why? Does this mean they were a decoy, and this was a joint operation? They have now apprehended multiple people, yet the shooter is still at large. An eyewitness claims that the shot was fired immediately after someone asked Charlie Kirk about trans violence and that he believes there were several people in on it. Did they wait for this specific question? The FBI and Kash Patel need to get to the bottom of this horrific crime as soon as possible. They cannot be allowed to get away with this.

This is important. Someone in the crowd confessed to the shooting immediately after it happened, despite not having a weapon? Why? Does this mean they were a decoy, and this was a joint operation? They have now apprehended multiple people, yet the shooter is still at large. An eyewitness claims that the shot was fired immediately after someone asked Charlie Kirk about trans violence and that he believes there were several people in on it. Did they wait for this specific question? The FBI and Kash Patel need to get to the bottom of this horrific crime as soon as possible. They cannot be allowed to get away with this.

Green Lives Matter

713,754 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 NEW: Tyrus just NAILED IT on Pete Hegseth absolutely smoking the Dems on The Hill: “The only thing I disagree with him on is when he was fighting back and said ‘who are you cheering for?’ I think the question shoulda been ‘who are you speaking for?’” “Who is coming up with this idea, why is America’s success so enraging to other Americans who were elected to support our troops?” “That’s what blows my mind. The fact that they clearly did not know whom they were going after because they’re not qualified to do what they do. So when they went at him, they didn’t realize this guy was born in this.” “From his early life, he wanted to be a solider. He was a soldier, he came back and he went thru hard times, found redemption, he’s got a strong family. Now he’s in a position where he’s protecting the men who walk the same trail he did.” “So for them to say anything to him, they’re vastly unqualified, uneducated and not charming at all,” says Tyrus

🚨 NEW: Tyrus just NAILED IT on Pete Hegseth absolutely smoking the Dems on The Hill: “The only thing I disagree with him on is when he was fighting back and said ‘who are you cheering for?’ I think the question shoulda been ‘who are you speaking for?’” “Who is coming up with this idea, why is America’s success so enraging to other Americans who were elected to support our troops?” “That’s what blows my mind. The fact that they clearly did not know whom they were going after because they’re not qualified to do what they do. So when they went at him, they didn’t realize this guy was born in this.” “From his early life, he wanted to be a solider. He was a soldier, he came back and he went thru hard times, found redemption, he’s got a strong family. Now he’s in a position where he’s protecting the men who walk the same trail he did.” “So for them to say anything to him, they’re vastly unqualified, uneducated and not charming at all,” says Tyrus

TV News Now

447,481 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 WOW! Tyrus says it PERFECTLY on the Congressional Democrats viciously attacking Sec. Pete Hegseth: "The only thing I disagree with him was he said, 'who are you cheering for?' And I think the question should have been: 'who are you SPEAKING FOR? Who are they? Who is telling coming up with this ideas?'" "Why is America's success so enraging to other Americans that were elected to support our troops?" "That's what blows my mind. The fact that they clearly did not know whom they were going after because they're not qualified to do what they do." "So when they went at him, they didn't realize that this guy was born in this, molded by it!" "From the time he was his life, he wanted to be a soldier. He was a soldier. He came back." "He went through hard times. He found redemption. He's got a strong family. He's got a great wife. And now he's in a position to where he is protecting the men who walked the same trails he did." "So for them to say anything to him, they are vastly unqualified, uneducated, and not charming at all." h/t TV News Now Tyrus

🚨 WOW! Tyrus says it PERFECTLY on the Congressional Democrats viciously attacking Sec. Pete Hegseth: "The only thing I disagree with him was he said, 'who are you cheering for?' And I think the question should have been: 'who are you SPEAKING FOR? Who are they? Who is telling coming up with this ideas?'" "Why is America's success so enraging to other Americans that were elected to support our troops?" "That's what blows my mind. The fact that they clearly did not know whom they were going after because they're not qualified to do what they do." "So when they went at him, they didn't realize that this guy was born in this, molded by it!" "From the time he was his life, he wanted to be a soldier. He was a soldier. He came back." "He went through hard times. He found redemption. He's got a strong family. He's got a great wife. And now he's in a position to where he is protecting the men who walked the same trails he did." "So for them to say anything to him, they are vastly unqualified, uneducated, and not charming at all." h/t TV News Now Tyrus

Eric Daugherty

26,972 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Breaking News🇬🇧: Starmer Caught Asking For No Mandelson Vetting. "The Prime Minister made NO stipulation at all that he wanted Peter Mandelson VETTED..he was IMMEDIATELY given security clearances at various levels on a case by case basis. The overriding goal was to have Madelson's appointment in place before the inauguration of President Trump on the 20th of January 2025 in any event". At a Foreign Affairs Select Committee meeting in Westminster today, the man PM Sir Keir Starmer SACKED for not conducting the correct security checks, admits to the world that Starmer directed him NOT to do so. After this initial disclosure PM Starmer's position is completely untenable.

Breaking News🇬🇧: Starmer Caught Asking For No Mandelson Vetting. "The Prime Minister made NO stipulation at all that he wanted Peter Mandelson VETTED..he was IMMEDIATELY given security clearances at various levels on a case by case basis. The overriding goal was to have Madelson's appointment in place before the inauguration of President Trump on the 20th of January 2025 in any event". At a Foreign Affairs Select Committee meeting in Westminster today, the man PM Sir Keir Starmer SACKED for not conducting the correct security checks, admits to the world that Starmer directed him NOT to do so. After this initial disclosure PM Starmer's position is completely untenable.

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

46,432 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

“The Prime minister deeply regrets ever having made that appointment but he made it at the time because he didn’t know these things” Steve Reed is lying. The Prime Minister has already admitted that he knew about Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. To now claim it was a “rational appointment” and doubling down on the “we-were-lied-to” narrative is as disgraceful as it is embarrassing. Cabinet Ministers should be resigning out of principle, not propping up Starmer’s rotten premiership. This Government line will not hold.

“The Prime minister deeply regrets ever having made that appointment but he made it at the time because he didn’t know these things” Steve Reed is lying. The Prime Minister has already admitted that he knew about Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. To now claim it was a “rational appointment” and doubling down on the “we-were-lied-to” narrative is as disgraceful as it is embarrassing. Cabinet Ministers should be resigning out of principle, not propping up Starmer’s rotten premiership. This Government line will not hold.

Ben Obese-Jecty MP

36,690 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад