Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Segal insists it’s too “difficult” to answer how she justifies attacking ABC’s Gaza coverage, when just 4 of “literally thousands” Ombudsman complaints are actually substantiated.🙄 Pathetic Then attacks ombudsman’s “standards”, wants her personally endorsed standards. Dangerous

57,691 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

How soft their parenthood is… 🤌🏻 #MilkLove #มิ้ลค์เลิฟ #MUVMUV 🙋🏻‍♀️: The mascot of Milklove is called… 💚: MUVMUV ka 🙋🏻‍♀️: How did you feel the first time you both met her? And before that, did you ever imagine what kind of personality MUVMUV might have? How did your feelings change before and after meeting her? 💚: For me, I felt excited at first. Personally, I really like mascots. I once dreamed of being inside them, and I actually had that experience once and really enjoyed it. (Being inside a mascot,) it felt like I didn’t have to think about anything serious and could just live in the moment. 💚: And when it comes to meeting MUVMUV, before that I never really thought about what she would be like or what kind of person she would grow into. I see her as a child, a child that we (💚💖) should protect at the proper level we can. So, she (🧡) can be herself freely, but if it’s in a way that causes trouble for others, then I may need to gently guide her. 💖: Exactly… I felt excited too when I first met MUVMUV. From a drawing, she became a keychain doll, and then turned into a mascot who can walk and even run. Personally, I find her very cute. And if she wants to do something, she can just do it. I just remind her to greet adults and to bow her head when meeting elders because everyone sees her as our child. Yes, she is just a kid, so we want to raise her to grow up gentle.

ɴᴋ 🐈‍⬛🌱

51,584 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

If she hits 30, still unattached, it’s ‘standards reevaluation time’. This is a largely UNCONSCIOUS PROCESS in unattached older women where they confront a few things: 1️⃣ All prior attempts to rope down the men they REALLY wanted have failed. 2️⃣ More and more of the men they really want have disappeared from the dating market, removed (i.e., snapped up) by other women. 3️⃣ They’re also getting less attention from men than they did when younger, hence are ‘less competitive’. These realizations prompt a ‘standards reevaluation’ that always sounds largely the same from girl to girl: • “I feel like I’m growing up.” • “I’m becoming more mature.” • “I’ve realized certain things I used to like (i.e., bad boy qualities) are maybe not so great.” • “I’m realizing things I used to overlook (i.e., nice guy qualities) are actually pretty attractive.” This doesn’t actually mean she finds nice guys ‘sexy’ now. It means she tried competing in the Big Leagues for the sexiest, most desirable men, but other girls snapped those men up. Reality is forcing her to rethink her standards a little bit. Ultimately, she’s responding to her own repeated attempts to rope down her most desired kinds of guys, but that failed: ❌ Guys who kept dating her / sleeping with her but put off anything serious. ❌ Guys who cheated on her (perhaps repeatedly) and wouldn’t go exclusive. ❌ Guys who promised marriage over the horizon but continually delayed & finally broke up. Humans, just like animals, learn from repeated attempts and their levels of success and failure. A woman who ropes down a desirable guy in her 20s and gets him to commit & marry her learns she is very desirable to desirable men. Meanwhile, a woman who is unable to get commitment from guys like this in her 20s enters a period of reflection, then reevaluation, culminating in ‘matured’ (i.e., reduced) mating standards. None of this is really conscious. The kind of talk you hear from the woman in this video is about as conscious as it gets. But it is ADAPTIVE, because it pushes unattached women to reduce their standards to a level that hopefully is still high enough to land a quality mate, but not so exclusive it shuts them off from the mates they are actually capable of securing commitment from.
1:22

Sensitive content

If she hits 30, still unattached, it’s ‘standards reevaluation time’. This is a largely UNCONSCIOUS PROCESS in unattached older women where they confront a few things: 1️⃣ All prior attempts to rope down the men they REALLY wanted have failed. 2️⃣ More and more of the men they really want have disappeared from the dating market, removed (i.e., snapped up) by other women. 3️⃣ They’re also getting less attention from men than they did when younger, hence are ‘less competitive’. These realizations prompt a ‘standards reevaluation’ that always sounds largely the same from girl to girl: • “I feel like I’m growing up.” • “I’m becoming more mature.” • “I’ve realized certain things I used to like (i.e., bad boy qualities) are maybe not so great.” • “I’m realizing things I used to overlook (i.e., nice guy qualities) are actually pretty attractive.” This doesn’t actually mean she finds nice guys ‘sexy’ now. It means she tried competing in the Big Leagues for the sexiest, most desirable men, but other girls snapped those men up. Reality is forcing her to rethink her standards a little bit. Ultimately, she’s responding to her own repeated attempts to rope down her most desired kinds of guys, but that failed: ❌ Guys who kept dating her / sleeping with her but put off anything serious. ❌ Guys who cheated on her (perhaps repeatedly) and wouldn’t go exclusive. ❌ Guys who promised marriage over the horizon but continually delayed & finally broke up. Humans, just like animals, learn from repeated attempts and their levels of success and failure. A woman who ropes down a desirable guy in her 20s and gets him to commit & marry her learns she is very desirable to desirable men. Meanwhile, a woman who is unable to get commitment from guys like this in her 20s enters a period of reflection, then reevaluation, culminating in ‘matured’ (i.e., reduced) mating standards. None of this is really conscious. The kind of talk you hear from the woman in this video is about as conscious as it gets. But it is ADAPTIVE, because it pushes unattached women to reduce their standards to a level that hopefully is still high enough to land a quality mate, but not so exclusive it shuts them off from the mates they are actually capable of securing commitment from.

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

54,631 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Lie detector results are in, and yes — that too was a lie. 🙄 Meghan has an iPhone. She’s had more than a few over the years. And there is absolutely no way that Siri, as she claims, is “not on my phone at all.”🐂💩 Siri isn’t a fancy extra you can take or leave; it’s baked into iOS. You can silence it, restrict it, or kid yourself it’s gone, but it isn’t. Even “disabling” Siri doesn’t actually disable it. Anyone with an iPhone knows that. Apple’s own support pages are littered with people asking why they can’t delete Siri outright. The answer is the same every time: because you can’t. Then she insists she doesn’t have “location services on her phone.” Again, nonsense. Just like Siri, location services are part of the device. You can limit them, you can switch them off for certain apps, but you cannot remove them. They’re hard-wired into the thing. So, once again, Meghan overshares — this time gesturing at her iPhone while wittering on about how the confetti text effect could be her flower sprinkles. And then, in her latest interview, she tries to sound quaint and “old-fashioned” by claiming she doesn’t use AI. The result? She only proves the opposite: she can’t even manage a simple explanation without tripping over something demonstrably false. She’s forever demanding that others “tell the truth” about her, yet she can’t seem to manage it herself on the smallest of details — Siri and GPS included. Meghan says wearing pantyhose made her feel “inauthentic.” No, Meghan — the only thing inauthentic here is you. #MeghanMarkleIsALiar #MeghanMarkleIsTheProblem #MeghanMarkleIsInauthentic #iPhoneFacts #SiriIsAlwaysThere #StopLyingMeghan #TechTruth #Oversharing #AuthenticityCheck #TruthMatters #BloombergMarkled

HRH Lady J 👑

124,625 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

#JanJingjing #แจนจิงจิง jan keeps making fun of jingjing’s niche sense of humor 55555555 🎤: (jjj is a pair some have been searching for because they are not the typical ‘polar opposites’ type) 🦊: well, it’s true. we have many things that are very similar, except for sense of humor, really 🐯: 😠 please! 🦊: today… 🐯: wait!! how many times are we going to talk about this? in how many interviews are we going to talk about this? 🦊: no, it’s… 🐯: it’s embarrassing!!! i’m embarrassed 🦊: i’ll let you show us an example, do you want that? do you dare? 🐯: i’m embarrassed! look at the people surrounding 🦊: so she tends to… the thing that isn’t the same is how we understand and make jokes (i.e., sense of humor). her jokes might be too niche. i don’t get them, and people around us also don’t get it. it might only reach a specific group. it’s niche. it’s jokes that are niche. mine are mainstream jokes, so they are easier to understand 🐯: actually, no on understands my jokes 🦊: she doesn’t whine/complain, but she just admits it 🎤: (did you expect any reactions/ratings after your joked) 🐯: as soon as i finished the joke, i turned to p’jan, who’s like, “huh what did you say?” so i learned that [my jokes are like] “what’s this? what kind of joke is this?” 🎤: so it’s not the first time, and it won’t be the last 🐯: actually, i’m someone who likes to say whatever comes to mind. i am not actually trying to make jokes. i just keep talking, but it sounds like a joke 🦊: you meant it to be a joke! she was trying to make a joke 🐯: not true~ 🎤: what if people don’t laugh? 🐯: p’jan laugh for me!! 🦊: i like people who try hard, you know? 555 🐯: p’~ honestly, the more we talk, the worse it sounds 🦊: no~ but her jokes are very pure. they don’t go through much thinking. it’s like she thinks of it… she wants to say something, she just says it. so yeah, it’s endearing~~

²²

16,680 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat