Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Selection commissioner “Gyanesh Ko Mar” defending delhi university for not showing mogliji’s degree! (Kaagaz nahi dikhayenge!) Content - Narundar

16,900 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

As the azaan echoes through Old Delhi and the sky turns amber, Neha Bharti begins her real work. For the past three Ramadans, she has served free iftar every single day outside Gate No. 3 of Jama Masjid, making sure no one nearby breaks their fast hungry. While others head home, Neha and her family step out with food prepared in their own kitchen, feeding nearly 300 to 350 people daily across all 30 days of Ramadan, welcoming anyone in need regardless of religion. Her mother, father, and brothers cook beside her. Friends help pack and distribute. What began with personal savings slowly grew into a community effort. Donations followed, from money to rice, fruits, and dates. Strangers turned into supporters. A Delhi University graduate, Neha also runs an NGO called Raah, providing free books to children in need. For her, service does not end with a meal. It continues with opportunity. Credits : i_am_neha_bharti | raah_ngo | | iamneha_bharti on IG #Ramadan #JamaMasjid #Delhi #Iftar [Ramadan, iftar, Jama Masjid Delhi, Neha Bharti] Disclaimer: The reproduced video or photo content is used under the fair dealing provisions of Section 52(1)(B) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, which permits the use of copyrighted material for the purpose of reporting current events, teaching, research and news. Our sole objective is to inform the public, not to exploit the creator's identity or content. We do not claim ownership of the material, full credit is attributed to the original creator or artist. Should you still wish to request the removal of the content, we'd be happy to assist you at [email protected] - The Better India

The Better India

14,443 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨BUSTED: Erika Kirk's ENTIRE College Story is a LIE —NO Double Major, NO Summa Cum Laude AND Her and Tyler Bowyer KNEW Each Other Since 2012! 😱 In Tonight's "Bride of Charlie" Episode: Candace Owens Just Proved Erika Kirk & Tyler Bowyer Knew Each Other Since 2012 at Arizona State University – And Erika Lied About Her Entire Degree! Candace drops receipts: Erika Kirk (née Frantzve) claims on LinkedIn & bios: Graduated ASU 2012 Summa Cum Laude with a double major in Political Science and International Relations/Foreign Affairs. Official ASU 2011-2012 Academic Catalog Archive: No such degree existed — no bachelor's in International Relations or Foreign Affairs. Only Political Science was offered. She graduated with a single major, no double. Spring 2012 Commencement Program: Erika listed as a regular graduate — ZERO honors (not Summa, not Magna, not even Cum Laude). Tyler Bowyer? Graduated the same year from ASU with Cum Laude honors. They were on campus together — meaning they knew each other years before Tyler's claimed "first meeting" at the 2015 Trump rally. But it gets deeper: Tyler Bowyer was directly appointed by Gov. Jan Brewer as Student Representative to the Arizona Board of Regents in 2011 — bypassing the normal selection process (usually a panel vote). Highly unusual "backroom wheeling and dealing" for a student. Candace: These two (and their families) were deeply politically connected long before Charlie Kirk. Military/intel ties from Operation Enduring Freedom, unusual appointments, credential lies — this screams placement as handlers to control Charlie and TPUSA from the start. Why fabricate an entire academic record? Integrity in a billion-dollar org? Donors deserve truth. FOLLOW Candace Owens and watch tonight's episode linked below for the full breakdown and documents. Timeline doesn't lie — what else are they hiding? Drop your theories below 👇🔥 RT if this series is blowing your mind!

Project Constitution

141,674 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

A British university student is facing prosecution after comparing a Keffiyeh worn by a pro-Palestinian activist to a “tea towel” during Freshers’ Fair at Royal Holloway. 20-year-old Brodie Mitchell told the President of the Friends of Palestine Society, Huda El-Jamal, that her keffiyeh looked like a “tea towel” after she called him a “wannabe Jew” because he was defending Israel and mocked him for not wearing a Jewish “hat”. In a classic case of double standards on campus, Brodie was handed a nine-week suspension the following day “for alleged conduct that could be considered hate speech”. He was told his comments were “Islamophobic”, “racist”, and “anti-Palestinian” and was barred from campus and forced to leave his student accommodation. Surrey Police have now confirmed they have sent a file to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a charging decision — meaning Brodie could face prosecution for saying El-Jamal’s headscarf looked like a “tea towel”. Meanwhile, she faced no disciplinary action and continued her studies as normal. Welcome to two-tier Britain. The case could be the first of many, given the Government’s decision to publish an official definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” and encourage universities to embed it in their speech policies. The definition is already being used to silence legitimate criticism of Islam. The Free Speech Union is supporting Brodie. With our help, he has been allowed back on campus, but under conditions that dictate who he can speak to and what he’s allowed to say. With our support, Brodie is taking Royal Holloway to the High Court, arguing he was unfairly forced to miss seven weeks of teaching, potentially delaying completion of his degree. We’ve also provided him with a top-notch criminal legal team in case the CPS decides to prosecute him. His own university, Royal Holloway, is spending nearly three-quarters of a million pounds defending its actions. At a recent hearing, it initially said its total costs could be as high as £734,000, with the risk that Brodie will have to pay them if he loses. In other words, the university is trying to scare him into dropping the case. But we’ve got his back. Welcome to the reality of free speech on English university campuses. In the absence of the complaints scheme that was legislated for in the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act being activated by Bridget Phillipson – she has delayed doing so for 18 months now – these are the ruinous costs facing students who want to stand up for their right to free speech. On this week’s episode of the FSU Podcast, Brodie Mitchell (Brodie Mitchell) shares his story with Connie Shaw. The full episode is available on the FSU YouTube channel (link in first reply).

The Free Speech Union

168,138 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The Supreme Court order on stray dogs in Delhi is nothing but a death sentence for every single stray on every single street in the national capital - and each one of us needs to raise our voice against it to #SaveDelhiDogs. Listen, I’m not some animal rights activist. I think every single stray dog needs to be vaccinated, sterilised, and released into safe surroundings. Those who bite humans should be rehabilitated or put into a shelter. But how on EARTH and WHY are you putting EVERY SINGLE STREET DOG in Delhi in a shelter? Pehle toh aapke paas shelter nahi hai, aur order implement ABHI honi hai. What is the government doing? Releasing them into the forest! Into the ridge! How the hell will they survive? What is worse, they have absurd rules - you cannot adopt any dog that has been put into a shelter. So what will a puppy who has been picked up from the street today do? Live the rest of his life in a sarkari prison? The Supreme Court is correct to worry about a rise in rabies cases. But the solution is not this ABSURD, IMPRACTICAL, and INHUMAN plan to throw all our street dogs into poorly managed, poorly built shelters in the middle of nowhere. GLOBAL examples have shown that there is only ONE solution to this problem: vaccinate, sterilise, and release. Why does the government not want to follow SUPREME COURT RULINGS directing the MCD to carry out sterilisation drives? With all due respect to the Supreme Court, today’s verdict is not based in legal precedent nor in common sense or scientific fact. Aur toh aur, it goes against laws put in place by Parliament because of leaders like Maneka Sanjay Gandhi ji. This is a classic case of judicial overreach by a judiciary that has forgotten that it cannot invent the law. Finally, baat rahi of long term solutions. Most strays were once pets bought from sasta breeders who don’t care about animals. What happens when the dog that Dimple Aunty bought for her son’s birthday is thrown onto the streets one year later? When he mates with another dog abandoned by another careless owner and has kids on the street? How many dogs will you keep transferring to these shelters - and for how long? Look at the condition of the gaushalas constructed by this government. Look at the failed policy of trying to send monkeys to shelters. Jo gay ko sambhal nahi paaye, jo Dilli mein bandaron ki samasya ka hal dhoondh nahi sake, woh kutton ki kya izzat karenge? MCD ki incompetence ki keemat hamare strays kyun bhare? Rekha Gupta ji, reconsider your decision. You still have time. We can work together to ensure Delhi’s streets are safe for dogs AND humans.

Anish Gawande

875,519 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr