Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Selective Democracy...!!

🇮🇳 𝓐 𝓙 ☀️

3,549 subscribers

53,416 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

15 Yorum

Deepak Bhasin profil fotoğrafı

Deepak Bhasin2 yıl önce

How true this person can be … he’s got the art to put facts so cleanly & effectively

VOZ profil fotoğrafı

VOZ1 yıl önce

"The Democratic Party's actions had left many U.S. citizens feeling humiliated. Signs of a Trump victory were proclaimed well before Biden withdrew from the race. The voters had had enough." 📝 @KarinaLMariani

Crish Bhatia 🇮🇳 profil fotoğrafı

Crish Bhatia 🇮🇳2 yıl önce

🤡🤡

🇮🇳 𝓐 𝓙 ☀️ profil fotoğrafı

🇮🇳 𝓐 𝓙 ☀️2 yıl önce

Hypocrite clowns.

Jasvinder Singh profil fotoğrafı

Jasvinder Singh2 yıl önce

Last line 👌👏👏👏👏 @ARanganathan72

Maverick007 profil fotoğrafı

Maverick0072 yıl önce

Destroyed the opposite side in a minute

🇮🇳 राधेश्याम🚩 profil fotoğrafı

🇮🇳 राधेश्याम🚩2 yıl önce

Quotes of @ARanganathan72

supersk🇮🇳 profil fotoğrafı

supersk🇮🇳2 yıl önce

This is true and you will not find any congress man answers this questions

CricketChuckle profil fotoğrafı

CricketChuckle2 yıl önce

you stand against them is very good but why are you not against the centre' s dictatorship professors were forcefully retired after the age of 50 years despite they have 10 more years of job left then there is perosn on 75 years is going to take oath as pm of india in his 3 term.

🇮🇳 Nitish 🇮🇳 profil fotoğrafı

🇮🇳 Nitish 🇮🇳2 yıl önce

💚 🥭 MC 😤🤬

CricketChuckle profil fotoğrafı

CricketChuckle2 yıl önce

you can't utter a word against the ruling regime and for that the reason is everyone not knows here but for me it is not new and i know the reason .

CricketChuckle profil fotoğrafı

CricketChuckle2 yıl önce

for every manipur you came up with sandeshkhali despite knowing that the people suffered in both the incidents but no you and your andhbhakts continously promoting and saying that sandeshkhali bhi to hua are bhai dono jgh bolo n manipur pe bhi aur sandeshkhali me bhi

CricketChuckle profil fotoğrafı

CricketChuckle2 yıl önce

everyone knows about this anand ranganathan ji that in bengal democracy is in danger so just answer me who will take responsibility and action against them who will take action against mamta banarjee bjp is in center for more than 10 years is it not their fault also ??

CricketChuckle profil fotoğrafı

CricketChuckle2 yıl önce

the centre has power to impose president rule if the state govt can't protect their people but pm is busy in capturing pictures and also wanted the people to died so that their propaganda will run and people divide into the religion

Lopa Mitra profil fotoğrafı

Lopa Mitra2 yıl önce

Dear @dhruv_rathee where are you

Benzer Videolar

Dr Allan Boesak: Democracy is, are people getting what they deserve? The "Defend our Democracy" were vocal with Zuma but defend & protect Ramaphosa. Nobody should be allowed to do so much harm to the country & people and not be called to account. It's selective indignation!

Dr Allan Boesak: Democracy is, are people getting what they deserve? The "Defend our Democracy" were vocal with Zuma but defend & protect Ramaphosa. Nobody should be allowed to do so much harm to the country & people and not be called to account. It's selective indignation!

Izwe Lethu

118,836 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

"If Malami can be arrested, why is Bello Matawalle with a 70bn EFCC case sitting in the cabinet, and Yahaya Bello untouched? Democracy cannot survive with this level of selective justice." Dr Najaatu Muhammad

"If Malami can be arrested, why is Bello Matawalle with a 70bn EFCC case sitting in the cabinet, and Yahaya Bello untouched? Democracy cannot survive with this level of selective justice." Dr Najaatu Muhammad

ADC Vanguard

140,231 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

BIG BREAKING 🚨 TMC MP Sayani Ghosh slams the BJP during debate on the no-confidence motion against the Lok Sabha speaker. She alleges that LoP Rahul Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav, and Abhishek Banerjee are not allowed to speak in the house, while the speaker always give priority to the BJP's blue-eyed boy. Democracy or Selective Democracy 🤨

BIG BREAKING 🚨 TMC MP Sayani Ghosh slams the BJP during debate on the no-confidence motion against the Lok Sabha speaker. She alleges that LoP Rahul Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav, and Abhishek Banerjee are not allowed to speak in the house, while the speaker always give priority to the BJP's blue-eyed boy. Democracy or Selective Democracy 🤨

Priya Purohit

58,583 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Trump indictment undermines democracy because if a law is going to be enforced, it should be enforced equally and fairly across the board. The selective use of govt institutions and law enforcement to go after political or personal opponents, undermines the very essence of the rule of law, which is the foundation for our democracy.

Trump indictment undermines democracy because if a law is going to be enforced, it should be enforced equally and fairly across the board. The selective use of govt institutions and law enforcement to go after political or personal opponents, undermines the very essence of the rule of law, which is the foundation for our democracy.

Tulsi Gabbard 🌺

1,643,211 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

It’s interesting that the interventionist “we-need-to-spread-democracy” crowd has absolutely nothing to say about Azerbaijan steamrolling & displacing 120,000 Armenian Christians from Nagorno-Karabakh. That makes their selective outrage a lot less compelling in other instances.

It’s interesting that the interventionist “we-need-to-spread-democracy” crowd has absolutely nothing to say about Azerbaijan steamrolling & displacing 120,000 Armenian Christians from Nagorno-Karabakh. That makes their selective outrage a lot less compelling in other instances.

Vivek Ramaswamy

496,029 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The #EU can write 2022 Report on Human Rights + Democracy in the world without mentioning the daily persecution + slaughter of #Palestinians by the Apartheid State of #Israel - And not a mention of Western supported Genocide in #Yemen - Why are we so selective in our criticism..?

The #EU can write 2022 Report on Human Rights + Democracy in the world without mentioning the daily persecution + slaughter of #Palestinians by the Apartheid State of #Israel - And not a mention of Western supported Genocide in #Yemen - Why are we so selective in our criticism..?

Mick Wallace

215,277 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

“They banned the bat, the symbol of the PTI, then they banned the batsman. The American ambassador needs to visit Imran Khan in prison and make sure that he lives to tell the tale of how he was wrongfully imprisoned through selective prosecution.” - Congressman Brad Sherman Congressman Brad Sherman addressing Assistant Secretary of State Donald Lu during the #CongressionalHearing on State of Democracy in Pakistan. #PakistanUnderFascism

“They banned the bat, the symbol of the PTI, then they banned the batsman. The American ambassador needs to visit Imran Khan in prison and make sure that he lives to tell the tale of how he was wrongfully imprisoned through selective prosecution.” - Congressman Brad Sherman Congressman Brad Sherman addressing Assistant Secretary of State Donald Lu during the #CongressionalHearing on State of Democracy in Pakistan. #PakistanUnderFascism

PTI

390,291 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Democracy shouldn’t be selective. Why lecture the world about it while bulldozing it in Kashmir? Our orchards and farmlands, sustaining families for decades, are being seized for railways we never agreed to. How is this ‘development’ when it tramples rights? Revoking Article 370 took away our autonomy. Now, land grabs threaten to erase our roots. How many more layers of loss must Kashmiris endure before this exploitation ends?

Democracy shouldn’t be selective. Why lecture the world about it while bulldozing it in Kashmir? Our orchards and farmlands, sustaining families for decades, are being seized for railways we never agreed to. How is this ‘development’ when it tramples rights? Revoking Article 370 took away our autonomy. Now, land grabs threaten to erase our roots. How many more layers of loss must Kashmiris endure before this exploitation ends?

Office of Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi

39,902 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Rajdeep Sardesai is out here crying that West Bengal didn’t have a “level playing field” because central forces were deployed for fair polling. So Rajdeep Sardesai wanted the usual TMC musclemen to roam free, loot booths, and let people die like in every past election? Is that your idea of democracy? What a shameful, tone-deaf take from a senior journalist. Indians are done with this selective blindness.

Rajdeep Sardesai is out here crying that West Bengal didn’t have a “level playing field” because central forces were deployed for fair polling. So Rajdeep Sardesai wanted the usual TMC musclemen to roam free, loot booths, and let people die like in every past election? Is that your idea of democracy? What a shameful, tone-deaf take from a senior journalist. Indians are done with this selective blindness.

BALA

216,708 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The political persecution of Derek Blighe The specter of political persecution in Ireland demands fearless scrutiny from a media that should guard democracy, not shield those in power. When voices critical of government policy or political opponents are marginalized or censored, the public is denied essential checks and balances. If journalism is to truthfully serve the people, it must illuminate abuses, defend legitimate dissent, and demand accountability, rather than normalize a climate where power acts with impunity. Too often, essential scrutiny is buried beneath spin and selective reporting, leaving the impression that the state operates as a dictatorship rather than a democracy. This erodes trust, undermines civil liberties, and signals a chilling effect on those who challenge authority. The media must pursue transparency, verify claims rigorously, and elevate diverse perspectives to ensure the government remains answerable to the people. Elon Musk Not Elon Musk Conor McGregor

The political persecution of Derek Blighe The specter of political persecution in Ireland demands fearless scrutiny from a media that should guard democracy, not shield those in power. When voices critical of government policy or political opponents are marginalized or censored, the public is denied essential checks and balances. If journalism is to truthfully serve the people, it must illuminate abuses, defend legitimate dissent, and demand accountability, rather than normalize a climate where power acts with impunity. Too often, essential scrutiny is buried beneath spin and selective reporting, leaving the impression that the state operates as a dictatorship rather than a democracy. This erodes trust, undermines civil liberties, and signals a chilling effect on those who challenge authority. The media must pursue transparency, verify claims rigorously, and elevate diverse perspectives to ensure the government remains answerable to the people. Elon Musk Not Elon Musk Conor McGregor

Captain Kieran Kelly

98,206 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Meet Anita Chhiba The “Diet Paratha” influencer who claims to celebrate South Asian culture but pushes a very selective agenda. Her page markets itself as a vibrant hub for desi creativity, diaspora stories, and “community.” Yet it conveniently platforms pro-Pakistan and pro-Bangladesh narratives while staying silent or soft on issues that matter to millions of Indians. And now? She’s openly cheering on violent protests, openly wishing Indian protesters would storm and burn down Parliament – exactly like the chaos that engulfed Nepal’s parliament. Sitting comfortably in the UK, she’s egging on “activists” to cross every red line while real Indians face the consequences. Classic armchair radicalism – use Indian culture and food nostalgia to build your brand, then cheer for its institutions to burn. This is not “South Asian representation.” This is hypocrisy wrapped in paratha aesthetics. When your “culture page” starts sounding like anti-India echo chambers and glorifies violence against the world’s largest democracy, the mask slips. True community doesn’t call for arson on Parliament. It builds, doesn’t destroy. Call out the selective “woke” brigade.

Being Political

21,643 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

🚨🇭🇺🇵🇱 WOW! Magyar Péter's First Official State visit to Poland meeting Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk. "Your historic victory in Hungary is a historic return to Europe, to integrity, true democracy and return to 'rule of law'." For reference Donald Tusk ordered the rapid police-backed takeover of public media (TVP headquarters surrounded, channels pulled mid-broadcast) and later targeted private opposition outlets shortly after taking power. Actions widely criticized as undemocratic power grabs and selective "rule of law." It showcases in the EU the double standards of what leader is democratic and which is not. Donald Tusk suffers zero sanctions for his actions as he is loyal to the EU and Ursula.

🚨🇭🇺🇵🇱 WOW! Magyar Péter's First Official State visit to Poland meeting Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk. "Your historic victory in Hungary is a historic return to Europe, to integrity, true democracy and return to 'rule of law'." For reference Donald Tusk ordered the rapid police-backed takeover of public media (TVP headquarters surrounded, channels pulled mid-broadcast) and later targeted private opposition outlets shortly after taking power. Actions widely criticized as undemocratic power grabs and selective "rule of law." It showcases in the EU the double standards of what leader is democratic and which is not. Donald Tusk suffers zero sanctions for his actions as he is loyal to the EU and Ursula.

Based Hungary 🇭🇺

28,482 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The health of a republic depends not only on elections being held, but on citizens trusting that institutions act fairly, transparently, and without discrimination. When people believe that voter registration, identity verification, or access to essential rights can be affected by administrative errors or arbitrary decisions, confidence in democracy inevitably weakens. A democracy must ensure that every eligible citizen has a genuine opportunity to vote and that any disputes are resolved quickly, transparently, and with due process. If bureaucratic procedures become so burdensome that they interfere with fundamental rights or essential public services, the state risks appearing more punitive than protective. Institutions derive their legitimacy from public trust, and that trust depends on fairness, accountability, and equal treatment under the law—not on selective or inconsistent application of rules. The strength of a constitutional republic is measured not by how efficiently it exercises power, but by how carefully it safeguards the rights and dignity of every individual, especially when mistakes occur. Protecting civil liberties, ensuring prompt remedies, and maintaining institutional neutrality are indispensable for preserving democratic legitimacy and the rule of law.

The health of a republic depends not only on elections being held, but on citizens trusting that institutions act fairly, transparently, and without discrimination. When people believe that voter registration, identity verification, or access to essential rights can be affected by administrative errors or arbitrary decisions, confidence in democracy inevitably weakens. A democracy must ensure that every eligible citizen has a genuine opportunity to vote and that any disputes are resolved quickly, transparently, and with due process. If bureaucratic procedures become so burdensome that they interfere with fundamental rights or essential public services, the state risks appearing more punitive than protective. Institutions derive their legitimacy from public trust, and that trust depends on fairness, accountability, and equal treatment under the law—not on selective or inconsistent application of rules. The strength of a constitutional republic is measured not by how efficiently it exercises power, but by how carefully it safeguards the rights and dignity of every individual, especially when mistakes occur. Protecting civil liberties, ensuring prompt remedies, and maintaining institutional neutrality are indispensable for preserving democratic legitimacy and the rule of law.

Ashok Dadhwal

13,045 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

The selective outrage is impossible to miss. Rahul Gandhi, who today speaks the language of protest and democratic rights, had a very different view in 2011 during Anna Hazare’s anti-corruption movement. In Parliament, he warned: “A process divorced from the machinery of an elected government that seeks to undo the checks and balances created to protect the supremacy of Parliament and this House sets a dangerous precedent for our democracy… Today, the proposed law is against corruption. Tomorrow, it may be directed toward something that is far less universally heralded. It may attack the plurality of our society and our democracy.” Back then, Rahul Gandhi effectively portrayed a mass protest as a threat to democracy. Today, he invokes democracy to defend another protest. Which Rahul Gandhi should India believe? And while the Congress lectures others on compassion, let us not forget the midnight police crackdown on Baba Ramdev’s peaceful protest at Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan in June 2011 under the UPA government. Tear gas, lathicharge and force were used against sleeping protesters. Rajbala, a 51-year-old woman participating in the protest, suffered catastrophic spinal injuries that left her paralysed. After months of battling for her life, she succumbed to those injuries. Contrast that with the present case. Sonam Wangchuk was shifted to a hospital following directions of the High Court to safeguard his health during an indefinite fast. There was no midnight lathicharge, no violent dispersal, and no attempt to crush dissent through brute force. If Rahul Gandhi wishes to invoke the values of truth and non-violence, he must first explain the Congress party’s own record instead of indulging in political amnesia.

The selective outrage is impossible to miss. Rahul Gandhi, who today speaks the language of protest and democratic rights, had a very different view in 2011 during Anna Hazare’s anti-corruption movement. In Parliament, he warned: “A process divorced from the machinery of an elected government that seeks to undo the checks and balances created to protect the supremacy of Parliament and this House sets a dangerous precedent for our democracy… Today, the proposed law is against corruption. Tomorrow, it may be directed toward something that is far less universally heralded. It may attack the plurality of our society and our democracy.” Back then, Rahul Gandhi effectively portrayed a mass protest as a threat to democracy. Today, he invokes democracy to defend another protest. Which Rahul Gandhi should India believe? And while the Congress lectures others on compassion, let us not forget the midnight police crackdown on Baba Ramdev’s peaceful protest at Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan in June 2011 under the UPA government. Tear gas, lathicharge and force were used against sleeping protesters. Rajbala, a 51-year-old woman participating in the protest, suffered catastrophic spinal injuries that left her paralysed. After months of battling for her life, she succumbed to those injuries. Contrast that with the present case. Sonam Wangchuk was shifted to a hospital following directions of the High Court to safeguard his health during an indefinite fast. There was no midnight lathicharge, no violent dispersal, and no attempt to crush dissent through brute force. If Rahul Gandhi wishes to invoke the values of truth and non-violence, he must first explain the Congress party’s own record instead of indulging in political amnesia.

Amit Malviya

37,699 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

President Trump just summed up the hypocrisy of modern Democrats in one brutal line by pointing out how the same people screaming “Jim Crow 2.0” about voter laws in mostly red southern states stay completely silent about heavily white, overwhelmingly blue New England states running elections under systems that are often even stricter. That’s why this hit so hard online. Trump exposed what millions of Americans already believe: for the political establishment, the outrage is never really about “democracy.” It’s about power and control. For years Democrats and media activists tried painting southern states as evil or racist anytime they passed voter ID laws, tightened ballot rules, or changed election procedures, while conveniently ignoring similar policies in deep blue states because those states vote the “correct” way politically. Trump’s point landed because it cut straight through the selective outrage and double standards people are exhausted from hearing every election cycle. The reason reactions exploded is because Americans are getting tired of being lectured by elites who apply completely different standards depending on who controls a state. One side gets branded dangerous and anti democracy for wanting election security, while the other side gets praised as defenders of democracy doing many of the same things. Trump has always been effective at taking complicated political hypocrisy and turning it into one sharp line regular people instantly understand, and this was another example of exactly that. 🤡

President Trump just summed up the hypocrisy of modern Democrats in one brutal line by pointing out how the same people screaming “Jim Crow 2.0” about voter laws in mostly red southern states stay completely silent about heavily white, overwhelmingly blue New England states running elections under systems that are often even stricter. That’s why this hit so hard online. Trump exposed what millions of Americans already believe: for the political establishment, the outrage is never really about “democracy.” It’s about power and control. For years Democrats and media activists tried painting southern states as evil or racist anytime they passed voter ID laws, tightened ballot rules, or changed election procedures, while conveniently ignoring similar policies in deep blue states because those states vote the “correct” way politically. Trump’s point landed because it cut straight through the selective outrage and double standards people are exhausted from hearing every election cycle. The reason reactions exploded is because Americans are getting tired of being lectured by elites who apply completely different standards depending on who controls a state. One side gets branded dangerous and anti democracy for wanting election security, while the other side gets praised as defenders of democracy doing many of the same things. Trump has always been effective at taking complicated political hypocrisy and turning it into one sharp line regular people instantly understand, and this was another example of exactly that. 🤡

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

20,799 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

#ManipurViolence #Kuki_Lives_Matter Rubber bullets for the majority Meitei community and live bullets for the minority Kuki community—where is the law, where is justice? An innocent Kuki civilian, who was part of a peaceful protest in KMC Kuki Village, was shot dead by central forces. This tragedy highlights the extreme and disproportionate force used against its own citizens in a democratic country like India. Such actions against peaceful protesters, and the killing of an innocent civilian, deepen divisions and erode trust in the government. In a democracy, the law should protect all its citizens equally, yet this selective violence shows a blatant disregard for justice and human rights. Where is the accountability for this senseless loss of life? Where is the commitment to equality under the law? गृहमंत्री कार्यालय, HMO India SpearCorps.IndianArmy President of India PMO India Vishwajeet Singh Tribal Army

#ManipurViolence #Kuki_Lives_Matter Rubber bullets for the majority Meitei community and live bullets for the minority Kuki community—where is the law, where is justice? An innocent Kuki civilian, who was part of a peaceful protest in KMC Kuki Village, was shot dead by central forces. This tragedy highlights the extreme and disproportionate force used against its own citizens in a democratic country like India. Such actions against peaceful protesters, and the killing of an innocent civilian, deepen divisions and erode trust in the government. In a democracy, the law should protect all its citizens equally, yet this selective violence shows a blatant disregard for justice and human rights. Where is the accountability for this senseless loss of life? Where is the commitment to equality under the law? गृहमंत्री कार्यालय, HMO India SpearCorps.IndianArmy President of India PMO India Vishwajeet Singh Tribal Army

Official KSO Shillong

10,573 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

JNU Has Crossed a Dangerous Line: When elected student leaders shout slogans about digging graves of the PM and Home Minister, it is no longer dissent. In the national capital, outside hostels at night, this reflects intent, not protest. JNU is known for ideas and debate, not threats and violent imagery disguised as politics. Disagreeing with a Supreme Court decision is every citizen’s right. But disagreement has a constitutional method. Argue the judgment, question the reasoning, approach legal forums. Abusing individuals while hiding behind institutions weakens the argument and exposes frustration, not principle. Political parties must stop justifying this as youthful anger. Accountability cannot be selective. Criticise the correct authority, keep facts straight, and respect democratic boundaries. India allows dissent because it trusts maturity. When that trust is misused, democracy itself pays the price. Jai Hind.

JNU Has Crossed a Dangerous Line: When elected student leaders shout slogans about digging graves of the PM and Home Minister, it is no longer dissent. In the national capital, outside hostels at night, this reflects intent, not protest. JNU is known for ideas and debate, not threats and violent imagery disguised as politics. Disagreeing with a Supreme Court decision is every citizen’s right. But disagreement has a constitutional method. Argue the judgment, question the reasoning, approach legal forums. Abusing individuals while hiding behind institutions weakens the argument and exposes frustration, not principle. Political parties must stop justifying this as youthful anger. Accountability cannot be selective. Criticise the correct authority, keep facts straight, and respect democratic boundaries. India allows dissent because it trusts maturity. When that trust is misused, democracy itself pays the price. Jai Hind.

Praffulgarg

16,251 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

What is happening in the name of SIR across Bengaluru, Hubballi, and many parts of Karnataka is a complete mockery of the electoral process. Instead of mandatory door to door verification by BLOs, people are being herded together like a public gathering and voter verification is being reduced to a farce. This is not SIR. This is an organised subversion of the very purpose for which SIR exists. The Karnataka Congress government appears more interested in protecting its vote bank than protecting the sanctity of electoral rolls. When individual verification is abandoned and mass exercises are encouraged, suspicions of facilitating illegal or dubious entries become inevitable. Democracy cannot function on political convenience, selective scrutiny, and appeasement. The Election Commission must act without delay, cancel every such compromised SIR exercise conducted across Karnataka, and order a fresh, transparent, and strictly rule based verification process. The people of Karnataka deserve clean voter rolls, not an electoral circus orchestrated for partisan gains.

What is happening in the name of SIR across Bengaluru, Hubballi, and many parts of Karnataka is a complete mockery of the electoral process. Instead of mandatory door to door verification by BLOs, people are being herded together like a public gathering and voter verification is being reduced to a farce. This is not SIR. This is an organised subversion of the very purpose for which SIR exists. The Karnataka Congress government appears more interested in protecting its vote bank than protecting the sanctity of electoral rolls. When individual verification is abandoned and mass exercises are encouraged, suspicions of facilitating illegal or dubious entries become inevitable. Democracy cannot function on political convenience, selective scrutiny, and appeasement. The Election Commission must act without delay, cancel every such compromised SIR exercise conducted across Karnataka, and order a fresh, transparent, and strictly rule based verification process. The people of Karnataka deserve clean voter rolls, not an electoral circus orchestrated for partisan gains.

Arvind Bellad

35,968 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

The way foreign media is suddenly obsessed with covering every breath of this so-called " Cockroach Janta Party" movement complete with dramatic drone shots, teary interviews, and instant "democracy in danger" headlines, has me 100% convinced. This isn't organic outrage. This is a scripted, well-funded operation. Look at the pattern: Selective outrage, amplified narratives, timed leaks, and an ecosystem that activates the moment any anti-India angle appears. Western outlets that barely noticed farmer suicides, temple recoveries, or border tensions are now laser-focused on "protests" involving the same set of usual suspects. Why the sudden love for "cockroach Janta"? Because this isn't a people's movement. It's a destabilisation project. Foreign entities, think tanks, NGOs, foundations with a history of colour revolutions elsewhere, have poured in money, strategy, and narrative control for years. They fund the activists, the lawyers, the media amplifiers, and the opposition ecosystem that provides the local faces. The goal is simple: Keep India unstable, divided, and distracted from becoming a true global power. They tried it with Anna Hazare, then "India Against Corruption" which later exposed itself. They tried it with CAA protests, farm laws, and every election cycle. Now it's this. India's democracy is messy, loud, and argumentative, that's our strength. But when foreign money and foreign cameras start directing the orchestra, it stops being dissent and becomes hybrid warfare. We saw this playbook in other countries. It ends the same way, chaos, economic damage, and weakened sovereignty.

The way foreign media is suddenly obsessed with covering every breath of this so-called " Cockroach Janta Party" movement complete with dramatic drone shots, teary interviews, and instant "democracy in danger" headlines, has me 100% convinced. This isn't organic outrage. This is a scripted, well-funded operation. Look at the pattern: Selective outrage, amplified narratives, timed leaks, and an ecosystem that activates the moment any anti-India angle appears. Western outlets that barely noticed farmer suicides, temple recoveries, or border tensions are now laser-focused on "protests" involving the same set of usual suspects. Why the sudden love for "cockroach Janta"? Because this isn't a people's movement. It's a destabilisation project. Foreign entities, think tanks, NGOs, foundations with a history of colour revolutions elsewhere, have poured in money, strategy, and narrative control for years. They fund the activists, the lawyers, the media amplifiers, and the opposition ecosystem that provides the local faces. The goal is simple: Keep India unstable, divided, and distracted from becoming a true global power. They tried it with Anna Hazare, then "India Against Corruption" which later exposed itself. They tried it with CAA protests, farm laws, and every election cycle. Now it's this. India's democracy is messy, loud, and argumentative, that's our strength. But when foreign money and foreign cameras start directing the orchestra, it stops being dissent and becomes hybrid warfare. We saw this playbook in other countries. It ends the same way, chaos, economic damage, and weakened sovereignty.

Being Political

15,057 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Fabian Watch🇬🇧🌹: "Ed Miliband's primary task is to deindustrialize the UK before 2030. He is a very dangerous man, who will oversee the end of manufacturing in the country, saddling Brits and businesses with the highest energy prices in the Western World, destroying any and all investor confidence". Miliband's father, Ralph Miliband was a prominent Marxist eventually becoming a leading Marxist lecturer, sociologist and academic in this dystopian totalitarian ideology. Fabian fundamentalists are constantly denying they represent an elitist managerial class that favours "governance by intellectuals and experts" over grassroots democracy. Fabian ideology embraced eugenics as a "scientific" tool for state planning. Leading socialists like Sidney and Beatrice Webb, George Bernard Shaw, and H.G. Wells believed that state control over selective human breeding was necessary to eliminate poverty, prevent "racial degeneration," and maximize the nation’s social efficiency. We see the traitorous filth destroying our country on a daily basis and pledge never to give them the dystopian future Miliband and his Fabian/Labour friends have in their sights.

Fabian Watch🇬🇧🌹: "Ed Miliband's primary task is to deindustrialize the UK before 2030. He is a very dangerous man, who will oversee the end of manufacturing in the country, saddling Brits and businesses with the highest energy prices in the Western World, destroying any and all investor confidence". Miliband's father, Ralph Miliband was a prominent Marxist eventually becoming a leading Marxist lecturer, sociologist and academic in this dystopian totalitarian ideology. Fabian fundamentalists are constantly denying they represent an elitist managerial class that favours "governance by intellectuals and experts" over grassroots democracy. Fabian ideology embraced eugenics as a "scientific" tool for state planning. Leading socialists like Sidney and Beatrice Webb, George Bernard Shaw, and H.G. Wells believed that state control over selective human breeding was necessary to eliminate poverty, prevent "racial degeneration," and maximize the nation’s social efficiency. We see the traitorous filth destroying our country on a daily basis and pledge never to give them the dystopian future Miliband and his Fabian/Labour friends have in their sights.

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

38,286 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce