Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Selective outrage is killing real accountability. Why has this become the norm? Whenever serious cases emerge, the conversation quickly shifts to labels like Islamophobia or communal narratives. But what about the actual crimes? In the Nashik IT case, reports indicate planned targeting through WhatsApp groups, identifying vulnerable individuals and...

13,575 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

There was a point in my conversation with Andrew Bridgen (Andrew Bridgen) where everything slowed down and the weight of what was being discussed became very real. This is a disgusting subject. It’s horrifying. And it’s exactly why it rarely gets talked about. Andrew speaks about child abuse and child trafficking into the UK and about how quickly the shutters come down when these issues are raised. Not debate. Not investigation. Silence. He goes further and explains something most people instinctively reject because it’s so hard to process. That at the very highest levels of power, child abuse and trafficking function as a form of sacrifice and as a binding mechanism. A glue that holds corruption together. Something so dark and compromising that it ensures silence, loyalty, and control among the most powerful people in the world. For most decent people, even contemplating this feels impossible. And that inability to imagine it is part of why it continues. It protects those involved. Andrew talks about having seen evidence. About how deeply disturbing it is. About the fact that even police officers investigating child abuse are limited in how long they can work on these cases because of the psychological damage it causes. This is not said lightly. And it’s not said for shock value. Posting this is not comfortable. Talking about it is not safe. Even sharing this conversation carries risk. But pretending these things don’t exist doesn’t make them go away. It only protects the structures that allow them to continue. If there are subjects that are truly forbidden, truly untouchable, then we should be asking why. And who benefits from that silence.

Digby Furneaux

18,654 views • 5 months ago

What really strikes me about this case of a man from Ghana who was living with a Zimbabwean woman in England, and who ended up living on private land in a forest in Scotland, is how the media is treating it as entertainment. It is not entertainment. It is tragic. This is clearly a case of mental illness and mental health distress. These are people who need assistance and proper care. We should not treat them as a spectacle. We should not reduce their situation to something for public amusement. In any country with a functioning system, this man would be in hospital receiving the support and treatment he clearly requires, not being paraded in front of cameras. Even British newspapers have reported on this, and one has to question whether the tone would have been the same if this were a white Anglo-Saxon man living with a white Anglo-Saxon woman, calling themselves king and queen while living in the bush. It is difficult to believe it would have been handled in this way. There would have been more empathy, more sensitivity, more focus on care rather than spectacle. It is deeply troubling that this same standard is not applied to black people. It is equally concerning that some Africans themselves are consuming and sharing this as entertainment. This is not entertainment. This is a human being in distress who needs help. It is painful to watch someone clearly struggling with mental health being treated in this manner. We must respond with compassion, empathy, and humanity when people are going through such circumstances.

Hopewell Chin’ono

96,372 views • 2 months ago